I'm not American, but from reading the
Wikipedia entry on Waco it seems pretty obvious Koresh and the kooks Jonestowned everyone when shit hit the fan. Is the prevailing opinion in the US that the ATF is responsible for the fire?
It's another one of those issues where it depends on what your politics are. If you think the Branch Davidians did nothing wrong, you almost definitely are also a Trump loyalist, live in a red state, and are probably poor (but I already said live in a red state)
They were definitely kooks. The ATF, though, blind fired automatic rifles into a church full of innocent people like the reverse of the Valentines Day Massacre. Both can be true. They can be a crazy religious cult, and the ATF can act with reckless disregard for human life.
How are people still coming down against the ATF there?
I get that a peaceful solution is preferable, but that whole thing could have been averted if the civilians involved had watched a white people version of this.
Yeah. Like why didn't the ATF have a teleportation device to safely beam the kids out of the barricaded cult compound full of heavily armed fanatics? We ought to be holding government agencies up to high standards like that.
Yeah, that's called a hostage situation. Those are hard and often end up with dead hostages anyway. However being all like "it was the terrorists who shot the hostages, they are to blame, what's your problem?" is known as going full retard.
Yes. It’s common in most law enforcement groups to have a dedicated dog handler for entering a premises. No knock raids include a “shoot the dog,” step.
The ATF, to inspire law enforcement everywhere, said fuck that and said “you guys. Only job is shoot the dogs, then help with the raid. DOG FIRST.”
Which is why gun owners make morbid reality jokes about “bye pupper” if someone posts a questionable picture, comment, or story. Bc the feds will shoot the dog while serving a warrant.
What I don't understand is why this whole problem is not solving itself via gun nuts putting evolutionary pressure on the US law enforcement until all no-knock raiders are out and politely knocking raiders reign supreme?
I mean, the way they talk about it, any no-knock raided gun nut should be able to take out at least a couple of policemen, having the home advantage and everything. What happens next, whether they will be killed or proven not guilty under the castle doctrine is not even important.
My working theory is that this shit happens in two parallel universes. In one universe the police successfully raid drug dealers and sometimes random people, mostly black, who might have a handgun they stashed away and only bring out to drug dealing stuff.
In the other slice of a multiverse there are gun nuts who are mostly white and who the police talk politely to and never even think about trying to raid them, no matter how silly they are, see that Bundy folks.
Because nobody wants to eat lead in the course of service, which is kinda interesting because the no-knock raids are promoted using the same logic, except that this logic only works when the target usually doesn't shoot back apparently. Which is kinda self-stultifying.
Well in an evolutionary sense the cops made it illegal to fight back or be held accountable.
They are not liable for shooting your dog. You however are liable for shooting them, EVEN if they got the address wrong and ran into the wrong house, shot the dog, and you went “hang on a tick, fuck that noise,” and shot back.
Now if logic prevailed and law abiding gun owners could defend themselves legally from the police, then yes I think the police would be much more, “ok, baby steps, ask him nicely if we can look around.”
Reality is that no knock raids are because they have cool toys and want to play with them. And fuck you plebs who don’t want to deal with that.
They are not liable for shooting your dog. You however are liable for shooting them, EVEN if they got the address wrong and ran into the wrong house, shot the dog, and you went “hang on a tick, fuck that noise,” and shot back.
That sort of presumes that when there's a no-knock raid and they shot your dog, you're pretty sure that it is in fact a no-knock raid and not a burglary, and that you wouldn't be shot anyways.
OTOH I think that I just answered my own question. A burglary wouldn't have all those fireworks and shooting dogs (unless it's in a rural place, which is why that shit doesn't happen there), so if you hear someone loudly breaking in and shooting your dog, that must be the police and lying on the ground submissively increases your chances of survival.
There are probably very few libertarians who would shoot the police nevertheless, not even hoping much to survive or to be acquitted if they survived, to promote a more pro-social behavior from the police at the cost of their own lives.
Exactly. If people blast the door in and shoot the dog, it’s a good chance it’s law enforcement. Right or wrong you are fucked, so let them shoot the dog, hit the floor, and hope no one panic squeezes the trigger while pointing the gun at your head.
I mean you've got that school resource officer standing outside the school during the whole shooting when Columbine was one of the biggest reasons we have cops in schools in the first place. These guys are fucking jokes when the danger isn't some black dude on meth at the park.
I hope so, it would be so sweet if the government's actual plan was just to kill them all. Gotta give them a high five in that case. I think they're too big of pussies for that though. :(
The R&D dept gobbled the whole budget (they're developing a special dog killing bullet that also performs reasonably well against brainwashed preteen girls). The hardest part is that the top brass requested the round be incendiary too.
I hate trying to navigate shit like this, because it's one of the few times where there's absolutely no way whatsoever for me to know for sure what really happened.
Neither side is going to tell it straight. The zealot patriotism of American media at the time, and the fact that no sane person who values there career is going to speak up for a cult that just hosted a siege, means the news reports would be riding that official narrative dick hard.
There's no more reliability in the other side of the story, either, because it's a cult after all - they're just as manipulative and narrative-bending as any government G-man group is.
So as an outsider, what story can I trust? Pretty much none of them. I more or less have to go with my gut.
I hate this. It's stories like these where this "post-truth" problem has been brewing, and now it's come to haunt us.
Can you blame Americans for not trusting the CIA and FBI? MKultra, black sites, assassinations, the war on drugs, toppled governments, operation paperclip, McCarthyism, the list goes on.
While I believe that the FBI investigation of trump is legitimate and that in 2018 their (known) actions have been justified, I can absolutely understand why any American would think I'm utterly naive for EVER trusting ANY American intelligence community, period. They have consistently shown that they can't be trusted and Americans have every reason to fear a deep state.
People who think the American paranoia that allowed trump to win is stupid are incredibly sheltered. Every single iota of that fear was justified by past experience.
The zealot patriotism of American media at the time, and the fact that no sane person who values there career is going to speak up for a cult that just hosted a siege, means the news reports would be riding that official narrative dick hard.
Did you actually watch news reports on it at the time? It was pretty much exactly the opposite of that. It was still the post-Watergate era when journalists were competing to find government scandals or anything they could blow out of proportion to look like a scandal. Media coverage was hostile to the ATF. The Republicans took every opportunity to blame Janet Reno for it. And if you really want to understand the media's reaction to Waco, you have to put it in the context of a series of events early in Clinton's presidency, including Travelgate and the fiasco in Somalia, that made his administration look incompetent and untrustworthy.
Can you blame Americans for not trusting the CIA and FBI?
No. But I do blame Americans for trusting every goddamn cult leader, drug dealer, and Russian defector more than the CIA and FBI. You can't pretend that a massive bipartisan conspiracy by the government agencies and all the bodies overseeing them is just as likely as Jim Jones v2.0 burning the compound down himself.
People who think the American paranoia that allowed trump to win is stupid are incredibly sheltered. Every single iota of that fear was justified by past experience.
It would be if they didn't have goldfish tier memories.
Fucking hell, I knew government hiring was shit but whoever the fuck thought that the special ed student should be put in charge of social media should be fired
The ATF is an organization that helps out thousands of young men who were too retarded to get into the FBI become special agents. Show some goddamn respect
93 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-03-01
Now with added cancer!
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 scatmunchies 2018-03-01
The Branch Davidians had it coming, and exterminating them is one of the few things Clinton did right.
1 siskonaut 2018-03-01
Unironically this.
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
ATF did nothing wrong.
1 gaynazifurry4bernie 2018-03-01
RIP Puppers
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-03-01
They didn't go far enough
1 JasonJewnova 2018-03-01
First non-retarded thing you've ever said
1 choriposting 2018-03-01
I'm not American, but from reading the Wikipedia entry on Waco it seems pretty obvious Koresh and the kooks Jonestowned everyone when shit hit the fan. Is the prevailing opinion in the US that the ATF is responsible for the fire?
1 jesse0 2018-03-01
It's another one of those issues where it depends on what your politics are. If you think the Branch Davidians did nothing wrong, you almost definitely are also a Trump loyalist, live in a red state, and are probably poor (but I already said live in a red state)
1 watermark02 2018-03-01
I believe that the government set the fire and I think it's awesome. Nothing quite like the smell of red state tards cookin' in the morning.
1 c3534l 2018-03-01
They were definitely kooks. The ATF, though, blind fired automatic rifles into a church full of innocent people like the reverse of the Valentines Day Massacre. Both can be true. They can be a crazy religious cult, and the ATF can act with reckless disregard for human life.
1 MantisTobogganMD_PHD 2018-03-01
Is that what you call Branch Davidians?
1 westofthetracks 2018-03-01
yes, but also that everyone there was fucking crazy and definitely needed to be dealt with, the gubermint just botched it hardcore
1 POZLOADS0 2018-03-01
https://mobile.twitter.com/TEN_GOP88/status/969091075183906816/photo/1
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-03-01
Is it just me or does this dude look like Brad Pitt with a fake mustache?
https://imgur.com/a/bIlKU
u/ed_butteredtoast plz approve imgur link
1 imguralbumbot 2018-03-01
Hi, I'm a bot for linking direct images of albums with only 1 image
https://i.imgur.com/sTrcnLX.jpg
Source | Why? | Creator | ignoreme
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-03-01
*SMACK*
Bad bot
1 Butch_Patterson 2018-03-01
I'm seeing Ashton Kutcher
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-03-01
Heh I see it too now
1 Butch_Patterson 2018-03-01
"HEY WACO YOU GOT PUNKED!"
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-03-01
I thought there was a 3 in there somewhere
1 Butch_Patterson 2018-03-01
Could be, I only watch the highest quality European crime dramas
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-03-01
CSI: Londonistan ?
1 Butch_Patterson 2018-03-01
So much better than CSI: Paristantinople
1 KingWayneX 2018-03-01
I kinda see the first boss from the IT crowd
1 Butch_Patterson 2018-03-01
So not the sex pants one?
1 nomad1c 2018-03-01
i thought it was the guy from Narcos
1 Socrates2x 2018-03-01
How are people still coming down against the ATF there?
I get that a peaceful solution is preferable, but that whole thing could have been averted if the civilians involved had watched a white people version of this.
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
Yeah those kids who burned alive should really have been made aware of how to behave.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-03-01
From Twitter
1 Death_Trolley 2018-03-01
You’re not supposed to barricade them in your kooky cult clubhouse, either
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
Also you're not supposed to fuck them (in theory) but some of those 13yo are pretty darn hot.
1 Socrates2x 2018-03-01
Yeah and you know what makes them even hotter? Gasoline.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-03-01
Isn't it weird how we hold government agencies to a higher standard than doomsday cults?
1 watermark02 2018-03-01
Retards lit fire to their own compound.
1 Redactor0 2018-03-01
Yeah. Like why didn't the ATF have a teleportation device to safely beam the kids out of the barricaded cult compound full of heavily armed fanatics? We ought to be holding government agencies up to high standards like that.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-03-01
Yeah, that's called a hostage situation. Those are hard and often end up with dead hostages anyway. However being all like "it was the terrorists who shot the hostages, they are to blame, what's your problem?" is known as going full retard.
1 JasonJewnova 2018-03-01
This is why you discipline your crotch spawn with a hot iron rod
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
Burning your kids is the only true way to teach them fire is bad once and for all.
1 Socrates2x 2018-03-01
If you make the ATF come get you, they’re bringing an ass kicking with them.
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
They shoot your dog, your kids, and burn your house. That'll teach you for not welding that muzzle device properly on your 15.9 inches gun!
1 DaYooper 2018-03-01
You know David Koresh ordered the fire set right?
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
He was a gud boi he dindu nuffin. Those 12yo girls seduced him, brainwashed him, then started the fire.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-03-01
How is a ceazy asshole setting fire to his own building the ATF's fault?
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
Found the ATF shill. Kill many doggos today?
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-03-01
Black Jerry Seinfeld is hilarious
1 InsaneHuckleberry 2018-03-01
Don’t forget the ATF has a literal “dog team” for raids and entries, whose sole job is to kill the dogs.
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
/r/dogfree
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-03-01
Don't forget r/childfree too
1 ruddgullitonashed 2018-03-01
Gotem
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
The ATF is a godsend for hateful redditors.
1 InsaneHuckleberry 2018-03-01
There’s no /r/fatfree though!
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
Used to be, kind of. Got shoahed though.
1 Cycloptichorn 2018-03-01
[It's still here](r/keto), they're just more subtle about it
1 OniTan 2018-03-01
/r/childfree
1 rewind45 2018-03-01
Are... Are you serious?
1 shallowm 2018-03-01
I don't think it's a specific unit ready to go at any time, it was just a team that was responsible for warding off or killing the dogs specifically during the Waco siege.
1 InsaneHuckleberry 2018-03-01
Yes. It’s common in most law enforcement groups to have a dedicated dog handler for entering a premises. No knock raids include a “shoot the dog,” step.
The ATF, to inspire law enforcement everywhere, said fuck that and said “you guys. Only job is shoot the dogs, then help with the raid. DOG FIRST.”
Which is why gun owners make morbid reality jokes about “bye pupper” if someone posts a questionable picture, comment, or story. Bc the feds will shoot the dog while serving a warrant.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-03-01
What I don't understand is why this whole problem is not solving itself via gun nuts putting evolutionary pressure on the US law enforcement until all no-knock raiders are out and politely knocking raiders reign supreme?
I mean, the way they talk about it, any no-knock raided gun nut should be able to take out at least a couple of policemen, having the home advantage and everything. What happens next, whether they will be killed or proven not guilty under the castle doctrine is not even important.
My working theory is that this shit happens in two parallel universes. In one universe the police successfully raid drug dealers and sometimes random people, mostly black, who might have a handgun they stashed away and only bring out to drug dealing stuff.
In the other slice of a multiverse there are gun nuts who are mostly white and who the police talk politely to and never even think about trying to raid them, no matter how silly they are, see that Bundy folks.
Because nobody wants to eat lead in the course of service, which is kinda interesting because the no-knock raids are promoted using the same logic, except that this logic only works when the target usually doesn't shoot back apparently. Which is kinda self-stultifying.
1 InsaneHuckleberry 2018-03-01
Well in an evolutionary sense the cops made it illegal to fight back or be held accountable.
They are not liable for shooting your dog. You however are liable for shooting them, EVEN if they got the address wrong and ran into the wrong house, shot the dog, and you went “hang on a tick, fuck that noise,” and shot back.
Now if logic prevailed and law abiding gun owners could defend themselves legally from the police, then yes I think the police would be much more, “ok, baby steps, ask him nicely if we can look around.”
Reality is that no knock raids are because they have cool toys and want to play with them. And fuck you plebs who don’t want to deal with that.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-03-01
That sort of presumes that when there's a no-knock raid and they shot your dog, you're pretty sure that it is in fact a no-knock raid and not a burglary, and that you wouldn't be shot anyways.
OTOH I think that I just answered my own question. A burglary wouldn't have all those fireworks and shooting dogs (unless it's in a rural place, which is why that shit doesn't happen there), so if you hear someone loudly breaking in and shooting your dog, that must be the police and lying on the ground submissively increases your chances of survival.
There are probably very few libertarians who would shoot the police nevertheless, not even hoping much to survive or to be acquitted if they survived, to promote a more pro-social behavior from the police at the cost of their own lives.
1 InsaneHuckleberry 2018-03-01
Exactly. If people blast the door in and shoot the dog, it’s a good chance it’s law enforcement. Right or wrong you are fucked, so let them shoot the dog, hit the floor, and hope no one panic squeezes the trigger while pointing the gun at your head.
And pray no one flash bangs the baby’s crib.
1 MinorityFragility 2018-03-01
It worked so well for Andrew Finch
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-03-01
Imagine seriousposting this garbage on /r/drama
1 InsaneHuckleberry 2018-03-01
Yeh bub, I know some folks who got no knocked....over a wrong address.
http://www.businessinsider.com/9-horrifying-botched-police-raids-2012-2#police-break-a-guys-arm-and-laugh-at-him-turns-out-he-isnt-a-drug-dealer-2
Imagine being a Trumpette.
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-03-01
Your friend should have gone 200% dorner afterword
1 InsaneHuckleberry 2018-03-01
Not a cop. And not black.
You really don't do Daddy's cause any good when you try to justify police fucking up.
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-03-01
Cop breaks your daughters arm and your friend pussies out and doesn't even hunt down a few of the cops family members execution style?
What a pussy
1 InsaneHuckleberry 2018-03-01
I know right? They're just not as manly and tough as you.
Keep yourself safe when the flashbang goes off.
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-03-01
I don't sell drugs from my house, so pretty sure I don't have to worry about that, friendo
1 westofthetracks 2018-03-01
he posted, not ten comments down from an article about a no-knock raid at the wrong address.
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-03-01
Yes but I bet that guy sold drugs. I don't. No need for me to worry
1 zergling_Lester 2018-03-01
Huh, when did /pol/ weaponize literal retardation?
1 snappleteadrink 2018-03-01
I mean you've got that school resource officer standing outside the school during the whole shooting when Columbine was one of the biggest reasons we have cops in schools in the first place. These guys are fucking jokes when the danger isn't some black dude on meth at the park.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-01
woah
1 watermark02 2018-03-01
Why does virtually every warrant have to be a no-knock warrant anyway?
1 POZLOADS0 2018-03-01
"Oh hey how's it going what's your name what do you do?", "Well my names Tom and I work for the ATF and my job is to kill dogs."
1 InsaneHuckleberry 2018-03-01
Tom doesn’t have many friends. He tried to befriend cat people but they’re crazy. And cat people.
1 jaredschaffer27 2018-03-01
Wow, in terms of public relations, this is like Rain Man level autism.
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
Even rain man had some basic empathy.
1 TheEnglishman28 2018-03-01
Kmart sucks
1 Rith2 2018-03-01
Reminder the branch dividians poured gasoline all over the place and there are recordings of them being told to do so
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
Fake news.
1 watermark02 2018-03-01
I hope so, it would be so sweet if the government's actual plan was just to kill them all. Gotta give them a high five in that case. I think they're too big of pussies for that though. :(
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
I'd vote for a government with that kind of balls. "Those fuckers have been annoying us for too long, burn them".
1 rewind45 2018-03-01
And this ladies and gentlemen is why you invest at least some of your budget in a PR department.
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
The R&D dept gobbled the whole budget (they're developing a special dog killing bullet that also performs reasonably well against brainwashed preteen girls). The hardest part is that the top brass requested the round be incendiary too.
1 Kgalindo7 2018-03-01
Top kek
1 InsaneHuckleberry 2018-03-01
Needs to sprinkle crack on the perpetrator.
1 hlary 2018-03-01
a bit of foam around the mouth will do the trick
1 PlasticTurd 2018-03-01
I hate trying to navigate shit like this, because it's one of the few times where there's absolutely no way whatsoever for me to know for sure what really happened.
Neither side is going to tell it straight. The zealot patriotism of American media at the time, and the fact that no sane person who values there career is going to speak up for a cult that just hosted a siege, means the news reports would be riding that official narrative dick hard.
There's no more reliability in the other side of the story, either, because it's a cult after all - they're just as manipulative and narrative-bending as any government G-man group is.
So as an outsider, what story can I trust? Pretty much none of them. I more or less have to go with my gut.
I hate this. It's stories like these where this "post-truth" problem has been brewing, and now it's come to haunt us.
Can you blame Americans for not trusting the CIA and FBI? MKultra, black sites, assassinations, the war on drugs, toppled governments, operation paperclip, McCarthyism, the list goes on.
While I believe that the FBI investigation of trump is legitimate and that in 2018 their (known) actions have been justified, I can absolutely understand why any American would think I'm utterly naive for EVER trusting ANY American intelligence community, period. They have consistently shown that they can't be trusted and Americans have every reason to fear a deep state.
People who think the American paranoia that allowed trump to win is stupid are incredibly sheltered. Every single iota of that fear was justified by past experience.
1 Redactor0 2018-03-01
Did you actually watch news reports on it at the time? It was pretty much exactly the opposite of that. It was still the post-Watergate era when journalists were competing to find government scandals or anything they could blow out of proportion to look like a scandal. Media coverage was hostile to the ATF. The Republicans took every opportunity to blame Janet Reno for it. And if you really want to understand the media's reaction to Waco, you have to put it in the context of a series of events early in Clinton's presidency, including Travelgate and the fiasco in Somalia, that made his administration look incompetent and untrustworthy.
No. But I do blame Americans for trusting every goddamn cult leader, drug dealer, and Russian defector more than the CIA and FBI. You can't pretend that a massive bipartisan conspiracy by the government agencies and all the bodies overseeing them is just as likely as Jim Jones v2.0 burning the compound down himself.
1 Matthew94 2018-03-01
Their
1 POZLOADS0 2018-03-01
It would be if they didn't have goldfish tier memories.
https://youtu.be/jFOBvCxx3qo
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-03-01
"This is highly insensitive and extremely distasteful."
The battle cry of the modern woman. Dammit I wish we could ping twitter users from here, get that hooker to come on down and defend her offense
1 InsaneHuckleberry 2018-03-01
I think we’d have too much autism.
Ever notice how Twitter tards phone a friend? You’ll hook one lolcow and get fifty.
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-03-01
you're saying that like it's a bad thing
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-03-01
Fucking hell, I knew government hiring was shit but whoever the fuck thought that the special ed student should be put in charge of social media should be fired
1 InsaneHuckleberry 2018-03-01
It’s one of their special interns, Donny.
They’re letting him try out different spots in the government. He said he likes to tweet so they gave him the ATFs handle for a day.
1 watermark02 2018-03-01
My biggest issue with Waco is that people survived. Come on ATF, you can do better than that.
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
Exactly. If the building is on fire you know the only survivors will be coming out of the doors and windows. You barely need to aim to shoot them.
1 92nd 2018-03-01
The ATF is an organization that helps out thousands of young men who were too retarded to get into the FBI become special agents. Show some goddamn respect
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-01
Their motto is "at least you didn't have to join ICE".
1 KingWayneX 2018-03-01
prison guard < state patrol < sheriff < city copy