The key thing to remember about the UK is that everyone is racist but simultaneously everyone is terrified about being called racist (it is basically cognitive dissonance to the max). This Rowan O'Connell is probably a virtue signaller by day and has had his cover blown.
uhh not sure about that dude. People in the Uk are just more civil, yeah there are racisits in the UK not denying that, but it's not like America where you know it's okay to be racist.
I'm not saying it exists, but generally English whites > Americucks. Probably because they have had a longer history with Asians. I dunno. I have never had an issue but I have only visited.
That is because in the UK (which is more than just England also includes the Scottish who are very racist the welsh likewise, and the Northern Irish who are drunks) people are not openly racist.
Yet if you go on social media you will see a huge amount of racism because people think (stupidly) they are somewhat protected there.
Also why are you talking about whites? All people of different colours are racist in the UK. The Arabs don't particularly care for the blacks and the chinese make lots of racist comments.
'Thinking racism = white people in 2018'.
Take Anthony Joshua with his black supremacist comments or Amir Khan with his homophobia. It is somewhat of a national hobby in the UK for some idiot to virtue signal and they have old comments resurface.
Again I am not denying there is racism, and you have to take what you see on the internet with a grain of salt.
Yes all people are racist. I am not white, so I am comparing whites from there vs America. I also don't really understand your comment, why can't I talk about them? What are you even on about?
Generally i find europeans to be of a better breed. I think we can agree, now not all americans are like that. Some of them are quite all right, but most are not. This is the main point.
Ever heard of the idea of 'fronting'? It is a concept by which people have a public and a private 'front'. The private 'front' is their true self, the public front is the charade they put on (virtue signalling if you will).
You will find very few people in the UK expressing racism openly but that does not mean they think it privately. And occasionally the mask slips so as to speak.
What people are saying on the internet is often their true self, it is what they really think but are afraid to express in public. Where people like Amir Khan mess up (and get caught) is they mistake social media as being private and have an expectation of privacy when it is really public.
One of the greatest jokes in human history is how Europeans think of themselves. No freedom of expression, no separation between church and state, barely functional bureaucratic republics, 'civilized.'
Besides the techno and liberated pussy their is no redeeming quality.
So? Have you seen america? Conservitive bible thumping fagoots on and on about the dumbest shit. Here's a question for you. What the fuck have conservatives contributed? What have they made? What have they advanced? Unrelated I hope lauren southern gets her shiksha pussy fucked by a pack of muslims. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.
The Problem for O'Connell is he used the 'M' word as in Coolest _ _ _ _ _ _ in the jungle. This is a basically considered a polite way of saying the 'N' word in the UK.
Too much development in the sub continent leading to pajeets having access to western knowledge/education and realizing the shouldn't settle for less. The muzzie pajeets were an explosive uneducated bunch so the britbongs started gas lighting and turned them against each other to the point where a United India won't exist and come into greater power. Partition happened and fast forward into current year, we have "bobs n vagene" comments as their national exports.
Actually the real problem lied in virtue-signalling. When Britain originally took control over India after Clive of India (title somewhat redundant) made them tap, the Brits tolerated India's quaint little customs like Sati (whereby a widow would be burnt alive on her husband's funeral pyre).
However, come the Victoria period and the idea of the 'white man's burden', the Brits basically realised the Indians were savages and should be taught not to be.
Thus become a lot of religious lecturing and trolling the Indians by saying their traditional customs were shit.
Then the infamous Indian Mutiny began whereby Indians and Muslims were told a lie that the British had covered their gun barrels in pork fat.
The Indians rebelled (except for the Sikhs since they were pretty chill and were playing a waiting game), they got put back in their box and the British carried out epic mass executions. These included tying people to the front of cannons and firing them.
After this period the Indians basically had a sulk until the inter-war years after WW1 when Britain was at their weakest. The Indians had tantrums including the Amritsar massacre and Winston Churchill deliberately causing a mass famine (wonder if Gary Oldman will mention that).
This continued until the 1930's whereby Prime Ministers such as Stanley Baldwin (also known for getting into trouble as a youth by sending porn to his friends) basically thought Britain should just let the Indians get on with turning their country into a shithole.
WW2 (one of the only sequels to be better than the original) interrupted and there were tensions. Gandhi admired Hitler (who in return thought Gandhi should be executed) and the Hindu's didn't want to intervene to help Britain. However, the Muslims (for the first and only time in the existence of their faith, the good guys) realised that a free India and Hindi Majority would kill all of them, helped Britain out.
After WW2 some people such as Enoch Powell (a genius who was noted for being one of the first contemporaries to say that maybe Britain didn't need so many immigrants) thought Britain could keep the Empire. That didn't work out though so they let the Indians get on with becoming as you so sensitively put it pajeets and washed their hands of the situation.
American wasn't a 3rd world country but it didn't have a military-industrial complex. Americans for a long time (really up until WW2) disliked the ideas of standing armies as they viewed these as being anathema to freedom and a route to tyranny.
Americans preferred the idea of a 'rifle by the fireside' that you could use to defend yourself against InjunsNative Americans Amerindians. And then put down and get on with trying not to starve.
Which wasn't how the British Empire generally made its money. It is a nice, even romantic idea to think of British toffs coming grabbing diamonds from some poor tribesman and then running off. Some such as Cecil Rhodes did a bit of this but no mostly they did not.
The British Empire generally made its money through trade (forced trade yes but trade). India was ideal because it was a huge market for fabrics and thus allowed industrial mill towns in Britain a place to sell their wares.
Also if you were in control of an area you have to support it. This meant having military garrisons place there and stopping local disputes (or playing them to your advantage).
Take slavery for instance. If you take the Eric Williams (black marxist) thesis that slavery became increasingly unprofitable because of the logistics and the fact that unlike with the poor workers you had to keep slaves healthy and fit (and provide homes to them). Slavery was a natural resource in the coloniser mindset and yet it became better over time to employ poorly paid workers rather than slaves.
Britain in the second half of 19th century was addicted to free trade. Which was why it didn't put huge tariffs on good like Germany and Britain did. It overreached itself mostly it made the railways to transport goods which were then used against it.
Actually it was caused by free capitalism. In the Victorian age the America-China relationship of today was mirrored in the British-America relationship there. British companies manufactured in America for low low costs because it was so expensive to make goods in the hyperpower.
The UK delegated its economic base throughout its empire, and then when Europe committed suicide in the name of God, King and Country via WW1 and "God, King and Country but in Black Leather* in WW2 they no longer had the military or naval power to sustain their Empire, and promptly collapsed.
The police in the UK it seems just make up the laws to do whatever they want, so they don't have to act on child grooming epidemics in Rotherham (afraid of being called racist), but they can arrest someone for mocking a footballer who had a heart attack.
Several council members were afraid of accusations of racism. The polices motivation was more like "LOL those dumb pakis can do what they want to their spawn".
That's way oversimplifying the sex scandal. I think classism probably played a bigger role than police being afraid of being called racist. I think you're giving too much weight to some after the fact rationalizations.
The victims were treated like shit that's for sure. The reason I said class played a part is because the cops treated some of the victims like lower class skanks who were running around with older men. If you're interested in this case, read the Jay Report. Don't read it if you don't feel like getting enraged, though.
94 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-03-04
Your condescending, contradictory bullshit isn't attractive to anyone except your frothing, basement-dwelling, virgin army.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 EntireWish 2018-03-04
The key thing to remember about the UK is that everyone is racist but simultaneously everyone is terrified about being called racist (it is basically cognitive dissonance to the max). This Rowan O'Connell is probably a virtue signaller by day and has had his cover blown.
1 LemonScore 2018-03-04
No, only white people are. Racism is endorsed if you're an immigrant.
1 StingAuer 2018-03-04
Source?
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-03-04
His immigrant derangement syndrome.
1 LemonScore 2018-03-04
Wow, that recent thread really fucked your ass so bad that it's still vibrating even now?
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-03-04
I'm sorry man. You seem upset.
Lolol
1 micronenis 2018-03-04
Are you projecting, Ed?
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-03-04
🐴♻️️👟
1 micronenis 2018-03-04
Ed, you have to communicate using words. Using only pictographs is anti-social and it's bad for your condition.
1 jackthebutholeripper 2018-03-04
🤜👌
1 LemonScore 2018-03-04
A recent example: the British Labour party appointing a lunatic tranny that hates whites to a political position.
1 StingAuer 2018-03-04
Source?
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-03-04
You mean white ppl right
1 EntireWish 2018-03-04
Nah even black people get arrested for calling transgenders (almost a race if on themselves) geezer.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4190064/Entrepreneur-hauled-court-hate-crimes.html
1 jackthebutholeripper 2018-03-04
can you actually do time in the UK for calling someone names? or is it just like a civil court thing. either way, that is fucked
1 EntireWish 2018-03-04
It would come under hate speech.
1 jackthebutholeripper 2018-03-04
what a bunch of geezers
1 kane4life4ever 2018-03-04
uhh not sure about that dude. People in the Uk are just more civil, yeah there are racisits in the UK not denying that, but it's not like America where you know it's okay to be racist.
1 EntireWish 2018-03-04
No, they are not. It just a passive aggressive and hidden racism.
1 kane4life4ever 2018-03-04
I'm not saying it exists, but generally English whites > Americucks. Probably because they have had a longer history with Asians. I dunno. I have never had an issue but I have only visited.
1 EntireWish 2018-03-04
That is because in the UK (which is more than just England also includes the Scottish who are very racist the welsh likewise, and the Northern Irish who are drunks) people are not openly racist.
Yet if you go on social media you will see a huge amount of racism because people think (stupidly) they are somewhat protected there.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/jack-maynard-youtube-im-a-celebrity-get-me-out-of-here-racist-homophobic-tweets-axed-quits_uk_5a152661e4b09650540e32d8
Also why are you talking about whites? All people of different colours are racist in the UK. The Arabs don't particularly care for the blacks and the chinese make lots of racist comments.
Take Anthony Joshua with his black supremacist comments or Amir Khan with his homophobia. It is somewhat of a national hobby in the UK for some idiot to virtue signal and they have old comments resurface.
1 kane4life4ever 2018-03-04
Again I am not denying there is racism, and you have to take what you see on the internet with a grain of salt.
Yes all people are racist. I am not white, so I am comparing whites from there vs America. I also don't really understand your comment, why can't I talk about them? What are you even on about?
Generally i find europeans to be of a better breed. I think we can agree, now not all americans are like that. Some of them are quite all right, but most are not. This is the main point.
1 EntireWish 2018-03-04
Ever heard of the idea of 'fronting'? It is a concept by which people have a public and a private 'front'. The private 'front' is their true self, the public front is the charade they put on (virtue signalling if you will).
You will find very few people in the UK expressing racism openly but that does not mean they think it privately. And occasionally the mask slips so as to speak.
What people are saying on the internet is often their true self, it is what they really think but are afraid to express in public. Where people like Amir Khan mess up (and get caught) is they mistake social media as being private and have an expectation of privacy when it is really public.
1 kane4life4ever 2018-03-04
Europeans > Americans
1 SocialistEphebophile 2018-03-04
Purebloods > Muggles
1 kane4life4ever 2018-03-04
Bussy>Pussy
1 SocialistEphebophile 2018-03-04
Shit>Lube
1 kane4life4ever 2018-03-04
mineral oil>shit
1 SocialistEphebophile 2018-03-04
I’m still not gonna fuck your shit-pipe, dude
1 kane4life4ever 2018-03-04
I tried.
1 SocialistEphebophile 2018-03-04
No Means No.
1 kane4life4ever 2018-03-04
but enough no's turn into a yessssssss. (づ￣ ³￣)づ
1 SocialistEphebophile 2018-03-04
First no means no.
Second no means a beatdown.
Third no means shotgun.
1 LightUmbra 2018-03-04
Wew
1 imnotagayboy 2018-03-04
Most of them only came over about 50 years ago, and you've had black people for what, 200?
To be fair though ours came over voluntarily so there's a bit less tension. Would be nice if they stopped blowing up every so often though.
1 kane4life4ever 2018-03-04
lol What?
1 imnotagayboy 2018-03-04
Asians, 50 years ago, England. As opposed to black slaves, couple hundred years ago USA.
1 PotatoePizza 2018-03-04
One of the greatest jokes in human history is how Europeans think of themselves. No freedom of expression, no separation between church and state, barely functional bureaucratic republics, 'civilized.'
Besides the techno and liberated pussy their is no redeeming quality.
1 moofacemoo 2018-03-04
'There'.
Cannot help but notice that you posted your comment in a European language.
1 LightUmbra 2018-03-04
He's speaking American you tard
1 PotatoePizza 2018-03-04
The vast, vast majority of English speakers are not European.
1 SuperiorExcess 2018-03-04
It's literally just the UK doing this
1 kane4life4ever 2018-03-04
Eastern europe is a mess, but these countries recently came out of the fall of the USSR. It's going to take time.
1 PotatoePizza 2018-03-04
Your head of state is the head of the church and unelected, and you can get crushed by libel for speaking the truth.
1 kane4life4ever 2018-03-04
So? Have you seen america? Conservitive bible thumping fagoots on and on about the dumbest shit. Here's a question for you. What the fuck have conservatives contributed? What have they made? What have they advanced? Unrelated I hope lauren southern gets her shiksha pussy fucked by a pack of muslims. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.
1 PotatoePizza 2018-03-04
On that we can agree!
1 kane4life4ever 2018-03-04
so hard right now.
1 geraldodelrivero 2018-03-04
do you have a license to make reddit comments?
1 kane4life4ever 2018-03-04
It was revoked for being autistic.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-03-04
1 EntireWish 2018-03-04
The Problem for O'Connell is he used the 'M' word as in Coolest _ _ _ _ _ _ in the jungle. This is a basically considered a polite way of saying the 'N' word in the UK.
1 EarnestNoMeta 2018-03-04
why the self censorship? you can say monkey here. unless you are afraid the crown is going to drag you into court?
1 EntireWish 2018-03-04
I don't live the UK. It was more to just leave certain things to the imagination.
1 hlary 2018-03-04
oh shit that was from tyler the creator? now i dont if he was being ironic or not
1 newfagalt 2018-03-04
This sort of shit is the reason Britain lost their empire.
1 EntireWish 2018-03-04
Actually profit was. Keeping control of shithole countries within Africa no longer was sustainable.
1 newfagalt 2018-03-04
I was referring to the only part of their empire that actually matters
1 EntireWish 2018-03-04
India? This was regarded as the 'Jewel in the Crown' as it provided important trade and connections with the rest of the Empire.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-03-04
Too much development in the sub continent leading to pajeets having access to western knowledge/education and realizing the shouldn't settle for less. The muzzie pajeets were an explosive uneducated bunch so the britbongs started gas lighting and turned them against each other to the point where a United India won't exist and come into greater power. Partition happened and fast forward into current year, we have "bobs n vagene" comments as their national exports.
Goddamn the Brits were smart and slimy!!
1 EntireWish 2018-03-04
Actually the real problem lied in virtue-signalling. When Britain originally took control over India after Clive of India (title somewhat redundant) made them tap, the Brits tolerated India's quaint little customs like Sati (whereby a widow would be burnt alive on her husband's funeral pyre).
However, come the Victoria period and the idea of the 'white man's burden', the Brits basically realised the Indians were savages and should be taught not to be.
Thus become a lot of religious lecturing and trolling the Indians by saying their traditional customs were shit.
Then the infamous Indian Mutiny began whereby Indians and Muslims were told a lie that the British had covered their gun barrels in pork fat.
The Indians rebelled (except for the Sikhs since they were pretty chill and were playing a waiting game), they got put back in their box and the British carried out epic mass executions. These included tying people to the front of cannons and firing them.
After this period the Indians basically had a sulk until the inter-war years after WW1 when Britain was at their weakest. The Indians had tantrums including the Amritsar massacre and Winston Churchill deliberately causing a mass famine (wonder if Gary Oldman will mention that).
This continued until the 1930's whereby Prime Ministers such as Stanley Baldwin (also known for getting into trouble as a youth by sending porn to his friends) basically thought Britain should just let the Indians get on with turning their country into a shithole.
WW2 (one of the only sequels to be better than the original) interrupted and there were tensions. Gandhi admired Hitler (who in return thought Gandhi should be executed) and the Hindu's didn't want to intervene to help Britain. However, the Muslims (for the first and only time in the existence of their faith, the good guys) realised that a free India and Hindi Majority would kill all of them, helped Britain out.
After WW2 some people such as Enoch Powell (a genius who was noted for being one of the first contemporaries to say that maybe Britain didn't need so many immigrants) thought Britain could keep the Empire. That didn't work out though so they let the Indians get on with becoming as you so sensitively put it pajeets and washed their hands of the situation.
1 throwawayact69 2018-03-04
Jokes on you, pajeets will be a superpower by 2030
1 nanonan 2018-03-04
So Australians for the cricket players and New Zealand for the rugby team?
1 PotatoePizza 2018-03-04
Meaning India?
You know before WW1 America was a 3rd world country.
1 ArtisticSky 2018-03-04
American wasn't a 3rd world country but it didn't have a military-industrial complex. Americans for a long time (really up until WW2) disliked the ideas of standing armies as they viewed these as being anathema to freedom and a route to tyranny.
Americans preferred the idea of a 'rifle by the fireside' that you could use to defend yourself against
InjunsNative AmericansAmerindians. And then put down and get on with trying not to starve.1 PotatoePizza 2018-03-04
It was a slave state without infrastructure that was based on the conquest of 'empty' lands by essentially Cossaks.
It was third world for the time.
1 backltrack 2018-03-04
You sure? They have a fuck ton of natural resources.
1 EntireWish 2018-03-04
Which wasn't how the British Empire generally made its money. It is a nice, even romantic idea to think of British toffs coming grabbing diamonds from some poor tribesman and then running off. Some such as Cecil Rhodes did a bit of this but no mostly they did not.
The British Empire generally made its money through trade (forced trade yes but trade). India was ideal because it was a huge market for fabrics and thus allowed industrial mill towns in Britain a place to sell their wares.
Also if you were in control of an area you have to support it. This meant having military garrisons place there and stopping local disputes (or playing them to your advantage).
Take slavery for instance. If you take the Eric Williams (black marxist) thesis that slavery became increasingly unprofitable because of the logistics and the fact that unlike with the poor workers you had to keep slaves healthy and fit (and provide homes to them). Slavery was a natural resource in the coloniser mindset and yet it became better over time to employ poorly paid workers rather than slaves.
Britain in the second half of 19th century was addicted to free trade. Which was why it didn't put huge tariffs on good like Germany and Britain did. It overreached itself mostly it made the railways to transport goods which were then used against it.
1 PotatoePizza 2018-03-04
Actually it was caused by free capitalism. In the Victorian age the America-China relationship of today was mirrored in the British-America relationship there. British companies manufactured in America for low low costs because it was so expensive to make goods in the hyperpower.
The UK delegated its economic base throughout its empire, and then when Europe committed suicide in the name of God, King and Country via WW1 and "God, King and Country but in Black Leather* in WW2 they no longer had the military or naval power to sustain their Empire, and promptly collapsed.
1 ArtisticSky 2018-03-04
You said exactly what OP said earlier down the page but your version is worse.
1 PotatoePizza 2018-03-04
Nah its the opposite, bitch.
1 ArtisticSky 2018-03-04
Your version is less humorous and less intelligent (much like your mom, just trying to get your level).
1 newcomer_ts 2018-03-04
Mocking death is unacceptable human behaviour which ever way you cut it.
However, to be called to court over it is a bit much even by British sellout standards.
1 watermark02 2018-03-04
LOL @ dead people
1 wwaalleess 2018-03-04
Jesus dude hopefully you aren't in the UK
1 Talonek 2018-03-04
No, I live in Clapistan, where you're allowed to have fun
1 EntireWish 2018-03-04
The police in the UK it seems just make up the laws to do whatever they want, so they don't have to act on child grooming epidemics in Rotherham (afraid of being called racist), but they can arrest someone for mocking a footballer who had a heart attack.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/mar/27/student-jailed-fabrice-muamba-tweets
1 watermark02 2018-03-04
Several council members were afraid of accusations of racism. The polices motivation was more like "LOL those dumb pakis can do what they want to their spawn".
1 parameciidae 2018-03-04
That's way oversimplifying the sex scandal. I think classism probably played a bigger role than police being afraid of being called racist. I think you're giving too much weight to some after the fact rationalizations.
1 EntireWish 2018-03-04
The authorities in Rotherham branded the victims themselves 'racist'. They were complete cowards by any stretch of the imagination.
1 parameciidae 2018-03-04
The victims were treated like shit that's for sure. The reason I said class played a part is because the cops treated some of the victims like lower class skanks who were running around with older men. If you're interested in this case, read the Jay Report. Don't read it if you don't feel like getting enraged, though.
1 crefakis 2018-03-04
Wtf are you on about, police don’t make laws
1 I_DRINK_TO_FORGET 2018-03-04
Kid was most likely drugged out of his goddamn mind and ODed in a cell like he deserved. 🤔
1 Matues49 2018-03-04
Mayos completely BTFO
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-03-04
Lollllll the whiteys are going to pay! No more privilege for you cumskins REEEEEEEEE
1 comebepc 2018-03-04
And there'll be absolutely no privilege in the campus
1 backltrack 2018-03-04
Christ
1 GoGoGadgetRetard 2018-03-04
😏😏😏
1 backltrack 2018-03-04
Hey. Mean.
1 GoGoGadgetRetard 2018-03-04
What's he gonna do, use his super retard strength to come after me? He's dead.
1 backltrack 2018-03-04
Drama is supposed to be CRYPTO hate. This isn't crypto
1 GoGoGadgetRetard 2018-03-04
This but ironically
1 Buy_ 2018-03-04
but what about the first amendment?
oh wait lol
1 GoblinThief 2018-03-04
does anyone have a link to the thread this guy commented in?
1 shallowm 2018-03-04
removeddit link
1 imnotagayboy 2018-03-04
He was killed by global warming?