Wait till /u/SirBrendantheBold finds out that some women have sex for straight cash. Not sure whether he’ll swap mass starvation for a chance at getting laid.
Well this is an odd thread. Hello everyone, I'm the betaboy cuck who doesn't like people being forced to sell their bodies just to avoid homelessness. This is appropriately dramatic.
So let's get a couple things set up from the start. First I was homeless when I was young which makes me particularly sensitive to the subject (I know, I'm such a bitch). Secondly, I was very successful in my sex life and it always happily involved consent. It's not very nice to suggest that I'm a rapist virgin. Thirdly, I am happily married to a wonderful partner who supports me and regularly makes me both loved and beautiful (lol, gay). Stereotypes can be fun; they're also stupidly inaccurate.
My response wasn't to 'some instances'. My response is to a system that despite having such apparant abundance manufactures conditions of scarcity to such a degree as to extort young people into selling their bodies as commodities. It is not an experience, criticism, or problem isolated to sex work. It is simply a dynamic that was crystalized at that particular moment at that particular activity within the system of capitalism.
As to the constantly stated argument that all communists love famine and repression, even poisoning the well on a rebuke of this, I am not a Stalinist. That is one variant of Marxist thought and one not particularly popular outside of edgy online communities. I am what is called an anarcho-communist or libertarian-socialist. We take after the Marxist tradition and writers like Kropotkin in rejecting the party line or authoritarian transitions equally alongside capitalism. The anarchists of Catalonia during the Spanish Civil War were not authoritarian and neither was the Free State of Ukraine (our actual history).
Or, y'know, keep pretending that I am literally Stalin.....hope I've given you enough ammo to 'throw shade'. Enjoy yourself, homies.
This does not compute. While I do love the estrogen of soy I can't help but worry no Islamist will literally fuck my wife unless I also identify as a cuck. The beta-boy is obviously to remind them that I will not resist their sharia law.
I am against jobs that happen not because the person has chosen to do them but because they were compelled by desperation by them. As I said, sex work is not unique but it particularly ugly. Someone grinding twelve hour days away in shit conditions for shit pay is also pretty awful.
Capitalism has existed for roughly 200 years. Why are people so convinced that we won't work without it? We work to provide and for respect. Money becomes a symbolic incentive for this but hardly the sole embodiment of it. There have been countless different market and non-market arrangement, including anarcho-communism, and not once have we stopped working. If anything, capitalism is unique in that it requires a labour surplus and unemployment to function. We do what we've always done, build houses and produce goods because we need them. The only difference is there won't be a capitalist monopoly siphoning off the 'surplus value' of our toil.
We take after the Marxist tradition and writers like Kropotkin in rejecting the party line or authoritarian transitions equally alongside capitalism. The anarchists of Catalonia during the Spanish Civil War were not authoritarian and neither was the Free State of Ukraine (our actual history).
So you dream of one day being brutally stomped on by your nearly-indistinguishable rival communists instead of just massacring kulaks?
That has been a distinct historical trend... Which is why most communists hate what we call tankies (USSR apologists who deny anything bad ever happened there).
We are however very easy to distinguish. We don't want a vanguard party or centralized state; we don't want gulags; and we don't want the state to replace the capitalist model. We want workers to own factories and firms in cooperative and democratic systems, in which voting labourers can both elect and replace leadership while critical decisions of operation are left to direct democracy. These models already exist and have been demonstrated to have high levels of productivity without any 'boss.
No, we do not want to murder kulaks. 'Remember Kronstadt' is a common phrase for our side of Marxism. Our enemy is the 8 people who own more wealth than the bottom half of the world combined, or the 2000 people who own half of the world's wealth combined. We don't resent free enterprise; we celebrate it. What we do resent is theft of the value of our labour.
There are a couple major advantages. First, we advocate the dissolution of federal and state governments, relying exclusively on municipal. Municipal governments are much more intimately connected and also don't have nearly as much grandstanding or circus. Trade unions facilitate networks of support and markets between the municipal/communal/firm production.
Anarchism also relies on limitations of power (naturally). We don't acknowledge the right of any government or representation to create laws or actions that harm others. While a community leader may organize collective endeavours like road maintenance, it certainly doesn't include the right to suddenly ban gays or Muslims. Otherwise, so long as you're not hurting anyone, there is no right for the community to infringe on you.
Capital and state are inseparable. This is why, in America, voter opinion has a null influence on policy and law while the positions of the 1% have near total. Democracy in capitalism is fundamentally perverted. That isn't a failing of democracy but the society it is enshrined within.
First, we advocate the dissolution of federal and state governments, relying exclusively on municipal.
If Municipal fucks me over who do I go to?
and also don't have nearly as much grandstanding or circus.
How do you know that?
Trade unions facilitate networks of support and markets between the municipal/communal/firm production.
Who decides the most efficient mode of transport?
We don't acknowledge the right of any government or representation to create laws or actions that harm others.
And what exactly does the municipal and the trade union do?
While a community leader may organize collective endeavours like road maintenance, it certainly doesn't include the right to suddenly ban gays or Muslims.
Guy hates gays, says the road to a predominantly gay community doesnt need roads maintenance.
Otherwise, so long as you're not hurting anyone, there is no right for the community to infringe on you.
My response is to a system that despite having such apparant abundance manufactures conditions of scarcity to such a degree as to extort young people into selling their bodies as commodities.
People have always sold their bodies as commodities. When you engage in any type of labor you're literally selling your body. Women have traded sex for security and social status since time immemorial. The big objection here is that we've entered post-feminism and rather than wrap that exchange in all the cultural and romantic trappings that made it palatable some people don't care if others are offended and have boiled the exchange down to its most basic essence: you fuck me and I give you something.
If a woman doesn't want to trade her ass for a roof over her head she can always go to a shelter, get a job and save some money, and once stable rent her own space for cash. That involves a bit of hardship and difficulty, but I'm not being "exploited" because I'm trading my labor for cash, and neither is anyone else. Anyone who decides to take the relatively easy route of laying back and spreading their legs to get what they want is making their own choices. If they have other options, and they do, they aren't being exploited for their bodies any more than they're exploiting the people they end up sleeping with for their property.
I like communism better, because those capitalist bitches might not even fuck you once a month in exchange for expensive rent in a big city. Communist bitches will do it for a head of cabbage or a loaf of bread, no questions asked.
Lavrentiy Pavlovich Beria (Russian: Лавре́нтий Па́влович Бе́рия, IPA: [ˈbʲerʲiə], Georgian: ლავრენტი პავლეს ძე ბერია, Lavrenti Pavles dze Beria, IPA: [bɛriɑ]; English: ; 29 March 1899 – 23 December 1953) was a Soviet politician of Georgian ethnicity, Marshal of the Soviet Union and state security administrator, chief of the Soviet security and secret police apparatus (NKVD) under Joseph Stalin during World War II, and promoted to deputy premier under Stalin from 1941. He later officially joined the Politburo in 1946.
Beria was the longest-lived and most influential of Stalin's secret police chiefs, wielding his most substantial influence during and after World War II. He simultaneously administered vast sections of the Soviet state and acted as the de facto Marshal of the Soviet Union in command of NKVD field units responsible for barrier troops and Soviet partisan intelligence and sabotage operations on the Eastern Front during World War II. Beria administered the vast expansion of the Gulag labor camps and was primarily responsible for overseeing the secret detention facilities for scientists and engineers known as sharashkas.
He attended the Yalta Conference with Stalin, who introduced him to U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt as "our Himmler".
I guess I won't tell them about the Bulgarian woman I dated who lost her virginity to the local Commissar so that her parents wouldn't lose their house. The good news is that he didn't make her do anal until her birthday when she turned 14.
Probably would have made a better point if they said that societal pressure to move out in order to better find a mate really can put you behind the eight ball financial wise, as staying home to save money/pay debt is the more logical financial move. But these guys are spergs so
Imagine being such a dense and stupid ideologue you shoehorn your ideological lens when viewing basic human behavior. Newflash, sex is basic human behavior that occurs for resources under any fucking system, if you don't think women were fucking in the USSR or any other economic system in order to acquire resources, you are genuinely retard.
"Isn't, that, like, prostitution? Gross!" Stacy thought to herself as she clicked the upvote button with derision. I have more self-respect than to ever do that, she concluded and picked up her phone at the sound of a notification. Her eyes lit up. Chad's taking me out to dinner tonight, and he even bought me a new cocktail dress!
The female is immunized against all dangers: one may call her a thot, roastie, slut, it all runs off her like water off a raincoat. But take off her makeup and you will be astonished at how she recoils, how injured she is, how she suddenly shrinks back: "I've been found out."
I love Chad, actually. I love the way his muscles crunch, the way oil trickles down his glistening abs, his chiseled features, his powerful jaw, his predatory eyes. I love it when he lets me feel his sweaty chest and broad forearms after a workout, and the firm, dominant handshake he gives when I pass along my fake business card-- anything for an excuse to indulge in the texture of his gently calloused hands.
Sometimes, I'll tuck my cock between my legs and play dressup, making sure Chad's a bit drunk at a party, watching him like a hawk. I can follow him home or into the bathroom for a night to feel what it's like to be Stacy, just for a little while. He's never figured out my secret.
Sure, and have at it. But the entire thing becomes compromised/muddied/twisted by the environment that compels women/men who specifically don't like it to do it anyways
Dont you think that sex is just like any other part of life?
I mean, many times we have to do things we dont want in other to get something we want. I dont see how socialism would change that basic human fact. I dont see it as a bad thing at all. We are still going to trade sex for something, even if that something is no longer a material thing.
I mean sure, I dont want to go home for christmas, but I still do it to not offend my family. Am I not consenting to go home for christmas? is there anything morally wrong here?
in which landlords are offering “free” accommodation in exchange for sexual acts - **and I want to find out how big the problem is for a BBC Three documentary.**
come on the editor had to know what they were doing here
86 comments
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2018-03-06
Wow capitalism is awful
But that's not real communism
1 mutecharlatan 2018-03-06
Those deaths was nazi propoganda..you know, if you take CTH word for it.
1 comebepc 2018-03-06
Actually at least 20 million
1 ThenTheGorursArrived 2018-03-06
China's famine alone crosses the 20 million mark, by lowest estimates.
1 Greekball 2018-03-06
Give or take, communism has directly lead to the death of about 100m people. Especially if we include later commie regimes like NK and now Venezuela.
1 comebepc 2018-03-06
TL;DR: communism is another reason why we need mayocide
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-06
but it’s all asians and spaniards
1 comebepc 2018-03-06
It was invented by a mayo
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-06
eh? yeah i guess
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-06
hey now, only like 30 million of those are actually attributable to communism
the rest are just attributable to Communists. or bad weather
1 Chukril 2018-03-06
Wait till /u/SirBrendantheBold finds out that some women have sex for straight cash. Not sure whether he’ll swap mass starvation for a chance at getting laid.
1 jubbergun 2018-03-06
The funny thing is /u/SirBrendantheBold holding an opinion on what could ruin an act they've never engaged in personally.
1 SirBrendantheBold 2018-03-06
Well this is an odd thread. Hello everyone, I'm the betaboy cuck who doesn't like people being forced to sell their bodies just to avoid homelessness. This is appropriately dramatic.
So let's get a couple things set up from the start. First I was homeless when I was young which makes me particularly sensitive to the subject (I know, I'm such a bitch). Secondly, I was very successful in my sex life and it always happily involved consent. It's not very nice to suggest that I'm a rapist virgin. Thirdly, I am happily married to a wonderful partner who supports me and regularly makes me both loved and beautiful (lol, gay). Stereotypes can be fun; they're also stupidly inaccurate.
My response wasn't to 'some instances'. My response is to a system that despite having such apparant abundance manufactures conditions of scarcity to such a degree as to extort young people into selling their bodies as commodities. It is not an experience, criticism, or problem isolated to sex work. It is simply a dynamic that was crystalized at that particular moment at that particular activity within the system of capitalism.
As to the constantly stated argument that all communists love famine and repression, even poisoning the well on a rebuke of this, I am not a Stalinist. That is one variant of Marxist thought and one not particularly popular outside of edgy online communities. I am what is called an anarcho-communist or libertarian-socialist. We take after the Marxist tradition and writers like Kropotkin in rejecting the party line or authoritarian transitions equally alongside capitalism. The anarchists of Catalonia during the Spanish Civil War were not authoritarian and neither was the Free State of Ukraine (our actual history).
Or, y'know, keep pretending that I am literally Stalin.....hope I've given you enough ammo to 'throw shade'. Enjoy yourself, homies.
1 LSDawson 2018-03-06
post bussy
1 pepperouchau 2018-03-06
"Soy-fed leftoid" is the preferred nomenclature around here
1 SirBrendantheBold 2018-03-06
This does not compute. While I do love the estrogen of soy I can't help but worry no Islamist will literally fuck my wife unless I also identify as a cuck. The beta-boy is obviously to remind them that I will not resist their sharia law.
1 Going_up_the_Country 2018-03-06
So are you against all jobs, or is sex super special for some reason?
1 SirBrendantheBold 2018-03-06
I am against jobs that happen not because the person has chosen to do them but because they were compelled by desperation by them. As I said, sex work is not unique but it particularly ugly. Someone grinding twelve hour days away in shit conditions for shit pay is also pretty awful.
Capitalism has existed for roughly 200 years. Why are people so convinced that we won't work without it? We work to provide and for respect. Money becomes a symbolic incentive for this but hardly the sole embodiment of it. There have been countless different market and non-market arrangement, including anarcho-communism, and not once have we stopped working. If anything, capitalism is unique in that it requires a labour surplus and unemployment to function. We do what we've always done, build houses and produce goods because we need them. The only difference is there won't be a capitalist monopoly siphoning off the 'surplus value' of our toil.
1 preserved_fish 2018-03-06
Um.
1 lickedTators 2018-03-06
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-03-06
I refuse to do any sort of work. Please hand me the means to continue living at my current level of comfort.
1 niczar 2018-03-06
So all jobs. Got it.
1 SirBrendantheBold 2018-03-06
All jobs in a capitalist market arrangement, yes.
1 niczar 2018-03-06
So what you're saying is, prostitution is no worse than being a high-paid executive.
Got it.
1 SirBrendantheBold 2018-03-06
That is not what I said. I think you're being silly. You are, you are being silly!
1 niczar 2018-03-06
You got it.
1 ConsoleWarCriminal 2018-03-06
So you dream of one day being brutally stomped on by your nearly-indistinguishable rival communists instead of just massacring kulaks?
1 SirBrendantheBold 2018-03-06
That has been a distinct historical trend... Which is why most communists hate what we call tankies (USSR apologists who deny anything bad ever happened there).
We are however very easy to distinguish. We don't want a vanguard party or centralized state; we don't want gulags; and we don't want the state to replace the capitalist model. We want workers to own factories and firms in cooperative and democratic systems, in which voting labourers can both elect and replace leadership while critical decisions of operation are left to direct democracy. These models already exist and have been demonstrated to have high levels of productivity without any 'boss.
No, we do not want to murder kulaks. 'Remember Kronstadt' is a common phrase for our side of Marxism. Our enemy is the 8 people who own more wealth than the bottom half of the world combined, or the 2000 people who own half of the world's wealth combined. We don't resent free enterprise; we celebrate it. What we do resent is theft of the value of our labour.
1 Wegwerf540 2018-03-06
The average person is fucking retarded and a Trumptard that doesn't believe in climate change.
Why would I want to live in such a world?
1 SirBrendantheBold 2018-03-06
There are a couple major advantages. First, we advocate the dissolution of federal and state governments, relying exclusively on municipal. Municipal governments are much more intimately connected and also don't have nearly as much grandstanding or circus. Trade unions facilitate networks of support and markets between the municipal/communal/firm production.
Anarchism also relies on limitations of power (naturally). We don't acknowledge the right of any government or representation to create laws or actions that harm others. While a community leader may organize collective endeavours like road maintenance, it certainly doesn't include the right to suddenly ban gays or Muslims. Otherwise, so long as you're not hurting anyone, there is no right for the community to infringe on you.
Capital and state are inseparable. This is why, in America, voter opinion has a null influence on policy and law while the positions of the 1% have near total. Democracy in capitalism is fundamentally perverted. That isn't a failing of democracy but the society it is enshrined within.
1 Wegwerf540 2018-03-06
If Municipal fucks me over who do I go to?
How do you know that?
Who decides the most efficient mode of transport?
And what exactly does the municipal and the trade union do?
Guy hates gays, says the road to a predominantly gay community doesnt need roads maintenance.
1 jubbergun 2018-03-06
People have always sold their bodies as commodities. When you engage in any type of labor you're literally selling your body. Women have traded sex for security and social status since time immemorial. The big objection here is that we've entered post-feminism and rather than wrap that exchange in all the cultural and romantic trappings that made it palatable some people don't care if others are offended and have boiled the exchange down to its most basic essence: you fuck me and I give you something.
If a woman doesn't want to trade her ass for a roof over her head she can always go to a shelter, get a job and save some money, and once stable rent her own space for cash. That involves a bit of hardship and difficulty, but I'm not being "exploited" because I'm trading my labor for cash, and neither is anyone else. Anyone who decides to take the relatively easy route of laying back and spreading their legs to get what they want is making their own choices. If they have other options, and they do, they aren't being exploited for their bodies any more than they're exploiting the people they end up sleeping with for their property.
1 keys_to_the_v_door 2018-03-06
dang ur terrible
1 jubbergun 2018-03-06
Pretty much, yeah, what did you expect to find here on /r/Drama?
1 keys_to_the_v_door 2018-03-06
mostlu terrible shit that i like reading
1 Thestateyest 2018-03-06
Reasonable and person aren’t words that apply to communists
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-06
when have anarchists ever lived long enough to mass-starve?
1 rockidol 2018-03-06
How many people died from poverty under capitalism?
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2018-03-06
A fraction of the number who died from legitimate starvation under communism?
1 3PPisForLosers 2018-03-06
Pretty sure if you die from poverty in America you actually died from retardation
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-03-06
I like communism better, because those capitalist bitches might not even fuck you once a month in exchange for expensive rent in a big city. Communist bitches will do it for a head of cabbage or a loaf of bread, no questions asked.
1 keys_to_the_v_door 2018-03-06
its definitely not real communsim, but definitely real capitalism kills a shitload anyway
1 Thestateyest 2018-03-06
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavrentiy_Beria
🤔
1 WikiTextBot 2018-03-06
Lavrentiy Beria
Lavrentiy Pavlovich Beria (Russian: Лавре́нтий Па́влович Бе́рия, IPA: [ˈbʲerʲiə], Georgian: ლავრენტი პავლეს ძე ბერია, Lavrenti Pavles dze Beria, IPA: [bɛriɑ]; English: ; 29 March 1899 – 23 December 1953) was a Soviet politician of Georgian ethnicity, Marshal of the Soviet Union and state security administrator, chief of the Soviet security and secret police apparatus (NKVD) under Joseph Stalin during World War II, and promoted to deputy premier under Stalin from 1941. He later officially joined the Politburo in 1946.
Beria was the longest-lived and most influential of Stalin's secret police chiefs, wielding his most substantial influence during and after World War II. He simultaneously administered vast sections of the Soviet state and acted as the de facto Marshal of the Soviet Union in command of NKVD field units responsible for barrier troops and Soviet partisan intelligence and sabotage operations on the Eastern Front during World War II. Beria administered the vast expansion of the Gulag labor camps and was primarily responsible for overseeing the secret detention facilities for scientists and engineers known as sharashkas.
He attended the Yalta Conference with Stalin, who introduced him to U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt as "our Himmler".
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source | Donate ] Downvote to remove | v0.28
1 lamb_der 2018-03-06
Nothing wrong with slavery, if you ask me.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-03-06
🤢
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-03-06
Pls stop using offensive and problematic terms. This is fucking wholesome family friendly area you dumb slut.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-03-06
I'm so sorry. I hope one day eventually you can find it in your heart to forgive me for this stupid and careless transgression.
1 sevgee 2018-03-06
gtfo nazi
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-03-06
reeeee
1 comebepc 2018-03-06
1 PM_ME_HAIRLESS_CATS 2018-03-06
semen contains up to 10 calories per average amount produced.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-03-06
1 Thhueros 2018-03-06
hey we aren't called cumskins for nothing
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-03-06
No that's just that wh*te color of mayo skin.
1 556x44 2018-03-06
umm are they saying this just to SPITE sex workers? WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK!?
1 OnlyRacistOnReddit 2018-03-06
I guess I won't tell them about the Bulgarian woman I dated who lost her virginity to the local Commissar so that her parents wouldn't lose their house. The good news is that he didn't make her do anal until her birthday when she turned 14.
1 ThenTheGorursArrived 2018-03-06
Get out oldfag.
1 OnlyRacistOnReddit 2018-03-06
No, you whippersnapper!
1 die_rattin 2018-03-06
That wasn't real Communism though
1 OnlyRacistOnReddit 2018-03-06
Of course it wasn't precious.
1 pepperouchau 2018-03-06
Gulag when?
1 OnlyRacistOnReddit 2018-03-06
I mean she was from a soviet block country, so she couldn't have really been that feminine right?
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-06
correct me if i’m wrong, but i don’t think the Soviet bloc was very anarchist
1 headasplodes 2018-03-06
Haha good one friendo
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-06
anarchists are Bizarro Commies. they look the same, but they’re VERY different
1 OnlyRacistOnReddit 2018-03-06
I don't think reddit anarchists are very anarchist. They like communism more than traditional anarchism.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-06
well that’s pretty gay, aren’t they at least ancoms
1 ChipChippersonAMA 2018-03-06
Probably would have made a better point if they said that societal pressure to move out in order to better find a mate really can put you behind the eight ball financial wise, as staying home to save money/pay debt is the more logical financial move. But these guys are spergs so
1 throwawayact69 2018-03-06
Imagine being such a dense and stupid ideologue you shoehorn your ideological lens when viewing basic human behavior. Newflash, sex is basic human behavior that occurs for resources under any fucking system, if you don't think women were fucking in the USSR or any other economic system in order to acquire resources, you are genuinely retard.
1 Magehunter_Skassi 2018-03-06
"Isn't, that, like, prostitution? Gross!" Stacy thought to herself as she clicked the upvote button with derision. I have more self-respect than to ever do that, she concluded and picked up her phone at the sound of a notification. Her eyes lit up. Chad's taking me out to dinner tonight, and he even bought me a new cocktail dress!
1 ConsoleWarCriminal 2018-03-06
The female is immunized against all dangers: one may call her a thot, roastie, slut, it all runs off her like water off a raincoat. But take off her makeup and you will be astonished at how she recoils, how injured she is, how she suddenly shrinks back: "I've been found out."
1 rockidol 2018-03-06
I don’t think you’re an expert on how women think
1 Magehunter_Skassi 2018-03-06
I love Chad, actually. I love the way his muscles crunch, the way oil trickles down his glistening abs, his chiseled features, his powerful jaw, his predatory eyes. I love it when he lets me feel his sweaty chest and broad forearms after a workout, and the firm, dominant handshake he gives when I pass along my fake business card-- anything for an excuse to indulge in the texture of his gently calloused hands.
Sometimes, I'll tuck my cock between my legs and play dressup, making sure Chad's a bit drunk at a party, watching him like a hawk. I can follow him home or into the bathroom for a night to feel what it's like to be Stacy, just for a little while. He's never figured out my secret.
1 K-town- 2018-03-06
Lmao
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-06
Unironically
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-06
stacy has something called “notes,” they don’t do the whole arrow thing
1 SoberProfessionally 2018-03-06
/u/SirBrendantheBold
You are against prostitution too brah?
I think to be consistent you would have to be against sex work too brah, otherwise I cant see the moral difference between prostitution and this
1 SirBrendantheBold 2018-03-06
Of course I'm against sex work. I don't resent prostitutes; desperation is desperation. It doesn't change the fact that it's awful.
1 Ricardo1701 2018-03-06
You are aware that some women do and like to it, right?
1 SirBrendantheBold 2018-03-06
Sure, and have at it. But the entire thing becomes compromised/muddied/twisted by the environment that compels women/men who specifically don't like it to do it anyways
1 SoberProfessionally 2018-03-06
Dont you think that sex is just like any other part of life?
I mean, many times we have to do things we dont want in other to get something we want. I dont see how socialism would change that basic human fact. I dont see it as a bad thing at all. We are still going to trade sex for something, even if that something is no longer a material thing.
I mean sure, I dont want to go home for christmas, but I still do it to not offend my family. Am I not consenting to go home for christmas? is there anything morally wrong here?
1 heavenlytoaster 2018-03-06
People enjoying things is oppressive to people who lack joy.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-06
well that was a misfire
1 SoberProfessionally 2018-03-06
meh
I have no problem when people are consistent actually
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-06
/u/SirBrendantheBold have you ever asked someone about this before? Most women can tell you that pretty much anything can ruin sex
1 SocialistEphebophile 2018-03-06
Commie tears improve sex, tho.
1 deere442 2018-03-06
lol from the article
come on the editor had to know what they were doing here
1 wolfsktaag 2018-03-06
if it werent for those damned capitalists, this internet anarchist would be drowning in pussy
the answer is clear: we must seize the means of reproduction