Pit bulls are cowards who prey on the weak, if they're disappearing good.

We can find other ways to destroy toddlers than these vile disgusting cruel cowards.

/u/EndTorture, we frankly are shocked, simply shocked you take such a disgusting stance towards both innocent animals and children.

Pit bulls are cowards who prey on the weak, if they're disappearing good. We can find other ways to destroy toddlers than these vile disgusting cruel cowards.

I did not say any of that, comments like these show that you all know you are trolls who twist people's words. I know you are trolls, you know you are trolls.

you reek of soy milk, clean yourself

GRILL ALL VEGANS

By the way, I am just pointing out this title is also false. I would never advocate someone buy bloody corpse "food" at the grocery store.

GRILL ALL VEGANS

You are all sadist trolls.

THE WEAK SHOULD FEAR THE tRONG

Common misconception there, the red steak fluid isn’t actually blood.

So there is actually no bloody meat at the grocery store.

, the red steak fluid isn’t actually blood.

Whatever you want to call it, "corpse and corpse fluid", it doesn't really matter. Technically it's not pure blood.

we support humanely dispatching vegans before grilling.

... Trolls.

It’s not blood at all. Not that I’m opposed to the taste of blood. Heart is delicious. I’m just clarifying the facts.

Trolls generally eat goats, not vegans. They also toy with their prey from what I’ve heard, which again, we don’t do. We’re humane.

I don't know or care what percentage of corpse fluid is blood. Unless it's 0.00% blood, I don't care if people call it blood.

Trolls also eat Christians and children who wander away.

we support humanely dispatching vegans before grilling.

... Trolls.

But I thought that vegans were OK with eating manflesh (ethically obtained of course)? Is I understand it, it's like sex: animals inherently can't consent so all sex with them is rape and immoral, but sex with consenting humans is OK.

What’s wrong with blóðmör, why you gotta be so ethnocentric

You are all sadist trolls.

Some of us are masochist trolls. plz come to my house & slap my ass with a tofurkey, slut.

What do you mean? He did quote you. It's kind of weird to on the one hand be against hunting, but on the other be for the killing of pit bulls... Because seriously, there are way more dangerous animals in the wild than pit bulls.

If you didn't say that then why did he quote you saying it? 🤔🤔🤔

Vegans are the true soyboys. They're weak as hell because their bodies lack tons of protein.

B-but muh beans and nuts!

Seriously, if I wanted to gobble nuts there’re a couple of bars downtown that serve that purpose much better.

We need to make it legal to hunt vegans. They are basically prey anyways. And I bet that soy diet makes for tender meat.

That's the guy from the /r/PublicFreakout thread.

/u/EndTorture

https://blog.nature.org/science/2013/08/22/too-many-deer/

Again, even if that was true, there are compassionate ways to deal with animal population control. But "too many deer?" (as your article asks) has no argument that anything I said was wrong.

What are the compassionate ways on controlling the deer population?

Provide them with condoms, duh. Obviously the soyboy vegans would do the prepping of the stag with a complementary warmup session on their bussies for extra compassion points.

Simple, reintroduce wolf population so they ripped apart and eaten alive like nature intended instead of a quick bullet death

First "deer overpopulation" is not a scientific concept, it's just some arbitrary figures people make up.

But if deer population was "overpopulation", as hunters always pretend, a better way than cruel tinydicked killers shooting them would be a form of birth control, eg in feed that the deer eat.

/obvious

/obvious

/obvious

dude you're a complete fucking moron. do you really not know what will happen if animal populations aren't kept in check? maybe you should take some biology classes or something when you get into high school.

here's a start.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Matthew_Island

In 1944, 29 reindeer were introduced to the island by the United States Coast Guard to provide an emergency food source. The Coast Guard abandoned the island a few years later, leaving the reindeer. Subsequently, the reindeer population rose to about 6,000 by 1963[6] and then died off in the next two years to 42 animals.[7] A scientific study attributed the population crash to the limited food supply in interaction with climatic factors (the winter of 1963–64 was exceptionally severe in the region).[1] By the 1980s, the reindeer population had completely died out.[2] Environmentalists see this as an issue of overpopulation.

if animal populations aren't kept in check?

Funny, I didn't advocate that. Why don't you try reading what I actually wrote? I wrote there's many compassionate ways to control animal populations, eg b.c. feed, reducing edible trash, etc.

First "deer overpopulation" is not a scientific concept, it's just some arbitrary figures people make up.

First "deer overpopulation" is not a scientific concept, it's just some arbitrary figures people make up.

That's 1) true and 2) only part of what I've said. I've also wrote there's many compassionate ways to control animal populations, eg b.c. feed, reducing edible trash, etc.

so you support starving them to death, how "compassionate" of you

You're spinning this.

For deer? No I spoke of feed. For rats? While BC feed could be useful here too, you need to reduce biological trash anyways or something will eat it. And BC feed it's not the only way to reduce rat population. If we slowly lessen biological trash then young rats won't find new places to spawn, some could be caught/moved to some rural place. etc etc.

We can find a compassion solution to all animal population problems.

, reducing edible trash

you literally said taking away a food source is a compassionate way of keeping the population down, i.e. starving them to death, that's not spin that's what you said

maybe you should round them all up and put them in "compassion camps" while you starve them. then you start gassing them when they're too weak to stand

i.e. starving them to death,

I'm not convinced rats would not be suddenly starved to death if we slowly reduced bio waste, each generation might have less babies. But other options are moving them to a rural place or BC food chips.

Health class too!!!

It is true. They over eat their food supply and die of horrible starvation in the winter or spread horrible terminal prions like chronic wasting disease and die of necrosis, insanity, and pneumonia.