Im saying that yes, youre not gay if youve never acted on it. Youre a total fag, but not gay. You have to literally commit the act to earn the adjective, or else my murderer comparison would be apt as well.
I like to think my studies into human development counteract the stupid sensationalist shit you spewed out in an attempt to justify your crackpot theories via gender.
Sorry are you blathering on about some evopsych bullshit when I'm talking biology or are you in some other social science trying to justify your six-figure student debt
Anyway feel free to link us to your substantial oeuvre
I took biology and what you’re blithering on about isn’t even in the course lmao
I’ve taken psych, human growth, & A&P. Currently on my way to get my AS. Gender starts to become very clear from age 2 onward. Look at the Dr. Money documentary and see what happens when you put gender “on a spectrum”.
I'm very familiar with Dr. Money's story but what he did is more akin to what we do to kids now--telling them what their gender/sex is, that it's unchangeable, and that they should be raised a certain way. His giant fuckup actually provided tons of support for transgenderism despite your inability to grasp that.
What does "gender" even mean in this context? It seems like whenever people make biological sex and gender separate entireties, "gender" ends up meaning "gender roles" and stereotypes about gender, which just seems really fucking backwards to me.
Why not just have biological sex for practical reasons where sexual dimorphism makes a difference, and let people do and choose what they want regardless of gender without trying to fit it into two discrete categories?
Attractive AMWF couple strongly indicates Silicon Valley or at the very least affluent California so there's a good chance both her and boy are God's chosen people.
37 comments
1 v_is_one_person 2018-04-01
archive
1 BloweyJoeyMumi 2018-04-01
/u/dilfmagnet please expand on your views in that thread pls
1 dilfmagnet 2018-04-01
Gender reveal parties are kinda dumb and biological sex isn't that simple.
Haha I wondered if this was gonna show up on r/drama though
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-04-01
Let's hope it doesn't.
1 BloweyJoeyMumi 2018-04-01
I was more curious about the "you can be gay without ever having sex" part.
Can I be a murderer without killing someone? 🤔🤔🤔
1 dilfmagnet 2018-04-01
So until you have sex you don’t have a sexual orientation?
1 BloweyJoeyMumi 2018-04-01
Pretty much? Kids arent gay or straight. Asexuals arent gay or straight...virgins arent suave chads either.
Im just curious.
1 dilfmagnet 2018-04-01
You can have romantic and sexual feelings towards people without fucking them. I realized I was gay, then had sex with a dude.
1 BloweyJoeyMumi 2018-04-01
Im not sure if desire and/or lust fall in with sexual orientation; at least during the formative years immediately preceding losing ones virginity.
Doesnt really matter. Just curious.
1 dilfmagnet 2018-04-01
Then what the hell do you think sexual orientation even is, and why do you assume I’m talking solely about formative years?
1 BloweyJoeyMumi 2018-04-01
Im saying that yes, youre not gay if youve never acted on it. Youre a total fag, but not gay. You have to literally commit the act to earn the adjective, or else my murderer comparison would be apt as well.
1 dilfmagnet 2018-04-01
Oh sorry I would not have wasted my time explaining if I knew you were a dipshit
1 BloweyJoeyMumi 2018-04-01
How dare you
1 dilfmagnet 2018-04-01
That was harsh. I’m sure you’re probably good for something, like buffing my hog
1 BloweyJoeyMumi 2018-04-01
A sexually deviant gay person???? Well I never.
Im shocked, frankly.
1 dilfmagnet 2018-04-01
If you think blowjobs are sexually deviant, oh brother
1 BloweyJoeyMumi 2018-04-01
Sorry, dadfucker. Im a bit of a prude.
1 shallowm 2018-04-01
If you want to murder someone, you would be murderous, not a murderer.
Are you actually arguing that people aren't heterosexual until they have heterosexual intercourse?
1 shallowm 2018-04-01
Are you actually arguing that people aren't heterosexual until they have heterosexual intercourse?
1 BloweyJoeyMumi 2018-04-01
Yes. Like tadpoles.
1 PM_ME_UR_SUSPICIONS 2018-04-01
You can be anything you want if you put your mind to it.
1 PracticalOnions 2018-04-01
It is if you take human growth and development & basic Anatomy and Physiology.
1 dilfmagnet 2018-04-01
Oh cool another dumb motherfucker who can’t read
1 PracticalOnions 2018-04-01
I like to think my studies into human development counteract the stupid sensationalist shit you spewed out in an attempt to justify your crackpot theories via gender.
1 joe579003 2018-04-01
I mean look at their username, they simply can't be rational about this because their orientation is such a enormous part of their identity.
1 dilfmagnet 2018-04-01
Sorry are you blathering on about some evopsych bullshit when I'm talking biology or are you in some other social science trying to justify your six-figure student debt
Anyway feel free to link us to your substantial oeuvre
1 PracticalOnions 2018-04-01
I took biology and what you’re blithering on about isn’t even in the course lmao
I’ve taken psych, human growth, & A&P. Currently on my way to get my AS. Gender starts to become very clear from age 2 onward. Look at the Dr. Money documentary and see what happens when you put gender “on a spectrum”.
1 dilfmagnet 2018-04-01
I'm very familiar with Dr. Money's story but what he did is more akin to what we do to kids now--telling them what their gender/sex is, that it's unchangeable, and that they should be raised a certain way. His giant fuckup actually provided tons of support for transgenderism despite your inability to grasp that.
1 allwordsaredust 2018-04-01
What does "gender" even mean in this context? It seems like whenever people make biological sex and gender separate entireties, "gender" ends up meaning "gender roles" and stereotypes about gender, which just seems really fucking backwards to me.
Why not just have biological sex for practical reasons where sexual dimorphism makes a difference, and let people do and choose what they want regardless of gender without trying to fit it into two discrete categories?
1 LightUmbra 2018-04-01
XX = female
XY = male
Anything else = anomaly
1 high_brow_tranny 2018-04-01
LightUmbra = little bitch
1 LightUmbra 2018-04-01
Why would you comment on a day old post?
1 high_brow_tranny 2018-04-01
Lol cus I knew you’d still read it. Good question though, little bitch
1 88shawking 2018-04-01
Yeah it's actually pretty fucking simple. You clearly haven't read the article or you don't understand the context.
1 dilfmagnet 2018-04-01
Let me know your favorite line in the article that disproves what I'm saying
1 88shawking 2018-04-01
No. Its pretty clear. No point in arguing with an idiot.
Why don't you think of some reasons and I'll let you know if you are on the right track?
1 Thulean-Dragon 2018-04-01
https://img.fireden.net/v/image/1507/40/1507408558370.png
1 irlalt 2018-04-01
Attractive AMWF couple strongly indicates Silicon Valley or at the very least affluent California so there's a good chance both her and boy are God's chosen people.
1 Coats_Unbuttoned 2018-04-01
The good news is that he’ll become a hapa and eventually wind up stabbing hem all to death.
1 irlalt 2018-04-01
>Not knowing this meme
1 Coats_Unbuttoned 2018-04-01
spamming your hapaganda on this blessed subbie
💁🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
1 cimarafa 2018-04-01
It’s possible, but her face is pretty goyisch.
1 DoubleCheekedUp 2018-04-01
True, her nose isn't hooked enough and her body doesn't look like a overstuffed bag of gefilte fish.