how so? that subreddit activally bans and censors topics about bitcoin, allows things to break the rules is they support 'btc-c0re' and removes things that don't breakk rules if they say something blockstream doesn't approve of.
I know, but your post was implying that buttcoin is the new r/bitcoin, which is not true as no one on r/buttcoin likes crypto.
But now that you explained what you said, I can see what you mean. There's indeed more legitimate discussions about bitcoin on r/buttcoin than there are on r/bitcoin.
Shouldn't be hard to clone some alt coin from the source, probably would need to work out something special for mining since nobody is going to do it realistically. I'm just not sure what you would do with it from there other than make a tipbot and give it away.
People with strong opinions on bitcoin vs bitcoin cash are morons, ethereum and 2nd/3rd gen cryptos are the future and bitcoin and it's old ass tech will die.
Yeah the paper in my wallet is crunching five fucking gigahashes a second to try and figure out what protein folding made it possible for you to be this fucking retarded
yeah I'm sure no energy was expended in the logging and paper production process and that printing takes absolutely no energy. Transporting those dollars to banks for them to be distributed is done by just dumping them outside of the processing center for the wind to blow them there. And then no energy is spent getting that money sent from point of sale locations to a bank to turn the dollars into usable digital currency. no processing power is used to convert those paper bills into account, it's just one guy hand counting all the bills and recording balances on a paper ledger.
And all that is ignoring the thing I said first, proof of stake exists and is one of the many reasons my original comment said bitcoin and bcc are both trash with an expiration date. But you're the same brainless bread as the btc and bcc shills that get their opinions fed to them by some circlejerk and literally brings nothing to the table besides some canned sound bites crafted by people with agendas.
A conversion from dollars to digital currency uses one or two computes. Every transaction in bitcoin uses as much electricity as a house does in a week.
His argument is basically that because dollars and cents uses some energy, that’s basically the same as the massive energy use of all the cryptocrappencies. It’s like they don’t know that two different numbers exist.
No, my argument is that energy consumption isn't unique to crypto and that there are alternatives to bitcoin that use less energy than fiat but that argument is ignored because you morons are completely ignorant of any facet of this discussion beyond blindly repeating crypto=bitcoin=energy consumption=bad.
>continues to argue against proof of work and only addresses one of many legs of the paper money energy consumption as the entire amount of energy consumed.
You seriously can't come up with any arguments if this conversation doesn't stay on the rails can you? You can't address any topics beyond bitcoin(which I've disavowed) takes up a lot of energy due to archaic design limitations.
imagine being a brainlet that doesn't know about proof of stake.
The fact that people have to learn a lot of shitty concepts to use cryptocurrencies just show it's uselessness.
imagine believing fiat currencies don't take a massive amount of energy and processing power to maintain.
The cost to make a $100 bill is about $0.132, while a the cost to mine a single bitcoin ranges from $531-26,170. Plus fiat a transaction doesn't need of electricity and internet.
You don't need to know anything about proof of stake to use crypto, just like you don't need to know anything about central banking to use fiat. But if you don't know anything about how cryptos work you're unqualified to have an opinion. Almost all fiat transactions are done over the internet.
And keep arguing against bitcoin, it shows the absolute limit of your knowledge on the topic has been fed to you by people with an agenda and you have no breadth of knowledge on the subject.
/u/noisylettuce Sorry if I'm misunderstanding this crypto stuff, but isn't the sidebar speaking against Bitcoin Cash (the centrally controlled version of Bitcoin)? It's condemning the moderators for trying to break the functionality of btc (regular bitcoin), which would force people to upgrade to Bitcoin Cash, right?
You are forgiven for misunderstanding given that the text on their sidebar is badly worded. The phrasing is so tortuous because it is so partisan.
What they are doing is condemning the main bitcoin for in their eyes forcing them to use a minority fork, when main bitcoin folks didn't opt to change over to the new system that allows larger blocks. They then link to a sub and a FAQ that advocates for bitcoin cash.
74 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-04-11
Now with added cancer!
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-04-11
Agreed <3
1 TheRootinTootinPutin 2018-04-11
-/u/noisylettuce
A touch on the crazy side, yeah?
-/u/Doctor_Buttsac
Don't fall in love with shills, doctor.
Also, /u/cojoco is a national treasure, and I won't see his good name sullied as a shill.
1 TheRootinTootinPutin 2018-04-11
/u/aqouta crypto drama, come on in and join the party
1 aqouta 2018-04-11
Thanks dawg.
1 noisylettuce 2018-04-11
I never said that. You are a liar.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-04-11
Luckily I caught your ninja edit. Nice try, /u/noisylettuce
1 noisylettuce 2018-04-11
BCashers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn1VxaMEjRU
1 Re_LE_Vant_UN 2018-04-11
😨😱
1 Torgard 2018-04-11
/u/noisylettuce, confirmed Oingo Boingo fan
1 zcc0nonA 2018-04-11
So you claim
1 camouflage365 2018-04-11
You're a mentally ill piece of shit
1 dr_gonzo_13 2018-04-11
Shill loser cunt delete your account
1 shitpost953 2018-04-11
yea but the nation :/
1 LightUmbra 2018-04-11
Somalian national treasure
1 OkThatsProblematic 2018-04-11
He is the Captain now
1 cojoco 2018-04-11
Your cheque is in the mail.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-04-11
Seeing as all of us are too lazy to create DramaCoin, I say we make WASA WASA WASA BEEEETCONNNNNEEEEECCCCTTTT the official cryptocurrency of /r/drama
1 cojoco 2018-04-11
/r/buttcoin exists to serve your crypto humour needs.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-04-11
Implying I don't farm buttcoin for drama material
1 zcc0nonA 2018-04-11
I thought buttcoin was officially renamed r\bitcoin thesedays?
1 Splendidisme 2018-04-11
Oh look it’s the mod in question continuing to push his agenda.
1 POST_BUSSY 2018-04-11
You couldn't be more wrong
1 zcc0nonA 2018-04-11
how so? that subreddit activally bans and censors topics about bitcoin, allows things to break the rules is they support 'btc-c0re' and removes things that don't breakk rules if they say something blockstream doesn't approve of.
https://medium.com/@johnblocke/a-brief-and-incomplete-history-of-censorship-in-r-bitcoin-c85a290fe43
1 POST_BUSSY 2018-04-11
I know, but your post was implying that buttcoin is the new r/bitcoin, which is not true as no one on r/buttcoin likes crypto.
But now that you explained what you said, I can see what you mean. There's indeed more legitimate discussions about bitcoin on r/buttcoin than there are on r/bitcoin.
1 -Steve_French- 2018-04-11
How much does shilling a scam pay, and where an I sign up?
1 zcc0nonA 2018-04-11
I have no idea, the mods of r\bitcoin pissed off a lot of people and I am one so here I am showing others how full of censorship they are
1 automatic_chuck 2018-04-11
LOL GAY.
1 imnotagayboy 2018-04-11
Surely there's at least one user here with some technical competency, or motivation?
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-04-11
There is, just no one with technical competency and motivation
1 4354523031343932 2018-04-11
Shouldn't be hard to clone some alt coin from the source, probably would need to work out something special for mining since nobody is going to do it realistically. I'm just not sure what you would do with it from there other than make a tipbot and give it away.
1 SPEZ_AKBAR 2018-04-11
There was an altcoin generator at some point.
1 buttcoinbuttcoin 2018-04-11
Pls no responsibility makes my bussy quiver.
1 N0ahface 2018-04-11
/u/xNotch
1 allendrio 2018-04-11
well considering he posts here he def doesnt have the latter at the moment, he probably pays someone to be motivated for him anyways.
1 GadolBoobies 2018-04-11
Some say he's a mod here.
Others say, you know...no he isn't.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-04-11
Yes, but it take work and time and doesn't provide dosh.
So why would anyone do it?
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-04-11
https://i.imgur.com/LgEbHSp_d.jpg
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-04-11
Fair enough.
1 aqouta 2018-04-11
Any moron could create an ethereum token named drama, it probably already exists but isn't traded for obvious reasons.
1 SageKnows 2018-04-11
Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
1 AnnArchist 2018-04-11
its bussycoin and it comes out next week. paypal me for ico access.
1 aqouta 2018-04-11
People with strong opinions on bitcoin vs bitcoin cash are morons, ethereum and 2nd/3rd gen cryptos are the future and bitcoin and it's old ass tech will die.
1 TheRootinTootinPutin 2018-04-11
Ethereum's contracts are super cool imo. Cryptokitties were also awesome. I hope ETH goes places, just not the bottom of the market xd
1 Capital_Rope 2018-04-11
Buy ETH and ChainLink.
1 _Suprememe_ 2018-04-11
This is the only guy who gets it.
1 automatic_chuck 2018-04-11
Let me explain something:
FIAT MONEY>USELESS WASTE OF ENERGY AND PROCESSING POWER
1 aqouta 2018-04-11
>imagine being a brainlet that doesn't know about proof of stake.
>imagine believing fiat currencies don't take a massive amount of energy and processing power to maintain.
1 gerradp 2018-04-11
Yeah the paper in my wallet is crunching five fucking gigahashes a second to try and figure out what protein folding made it possible for you to be this fucking retarded
1 aqouta 2018-04-11
yeah I'm sure no energy was expended in the logging and paper production process and that printing takes absolutely no energy. Transporting those dollars to banks for them to be distributed is done by just dumping them outside of the processing center for the wind to blow them there. And then no energy is spent getting that money sent from point of sale locations to a bank to turn the dollars into usable digital currency. no processing power is used to convert those paper bills into account, it's just one guy hand counting all the bills and recording balances on a paper ledger.
And all that is ignoring the thing I said first, proof of stake exists and is one of the many reasons my original comment said bitcoin and bcc are both trash with an expiration date. But you're the same brainless bread as the btc and bcc shills that get their opinions fed to them by some circlejerk and literally brings nothing to the table besides some canned sound bites crafted by people with agendas.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2018-04-11
You like yours medium rare?
1 aqouta 2018-04-11
And paid for in Ethereum or IOTA preferable.
1 giroth 2018-04-11
PoS blows, how can people not see it's going to immediately lead to inequality problems of which the world already has plenty
I like using electricity/computing power as the tie back to the real world
1 aqouta 2018-04-11
Being able to gain a small amount of interest for locking up your currency is not a new concept.
1 giroth 2018-04-11
Infidel, the Prophet outlawed usury long ago
1 gerradp 2018-04-11
A conversion from dollars to digital currency uses one or two computes. Every transaction in bitcoin uses as much electricity as a house does in a week.
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/ywbbpm/bitcoin-mining-electricity-consumption-ethereum-energy-climate-change
Christ, you are a fucking idiot. Great argument you drooling lemming fuckwit
1 Manannin 2018-04-11
His argument is basically that because dollars and cents uses some energy, that’s basically the same as the massive energy use of all the cryptocrappencies. It’s like they don’t know that two different numbers exist.
1 aqouta 2018-04-11
No, my argument is that energy consumption isn't unique to crypto and that there are alternatives to bitcoin that use less energy than fiat but that argument is ignored because you morons are completely ignorant of any facet of this discussion beyond blindly repeating crypto=bitcoin=energy consumption=bad.
1 aqouta 2018-04-11
>continues to argue against proof of work and only addresses one of many legs of the paper money energy consumption as the entire amount of energy consumed.
You seriously can't come up with any arguments if this conversation doesn't stay on the rails can you? You can't address any topics beyond bitcoin(which I've disavowed) takes up a lot of energy due to archaic design limitations.
1 automatic_chuck 2018-04-11
The fact that people have to learn a lot of shitty concepts to use cryptocurrencies just show it's uselessness.
The cost to make a $100 bill is about $0.132, while a the cost to mine a single bitcoin ranges from $531-26,170. Plus fiat a transaction doesn't need of electricity and internet.
1 aqouta 2018-04-11
You don't need to know anything about proof of stake to use crypto, just like you don't need to know anything about central banking to use fiat. But if you don't know anything about how cryptos work you're unqualified to have an opinion. Almost all fiat transactions are done over the internet.
And keep arguing against bitcoin, it shows the absolute limit of your knowledge on the topic has been fed to you by people with an agenda and you have no breadth of knowledge on the subject.
1 automatic_chuck 2018-04-11
LOL GAY.
1 AnnArchist 2018-04-11
lmao.
1 freet0 2018-04-11
lol idiot
gold>made up bullshit valueless paper
1 Neronoah 2018-04-11
Milton Friedman would mock you for saying this.
1 automatic_chuck 2018-04-11
SHOPLIFTING>GOLD
1 giroth 2018-04-11
And tokens built on top of ETH and similar have massive potential (see the Golem mainnet launch).
Also, fuck you for making me seriouspost
1 aqouta 2018-04-11
Imagine actually caring if your mods are unprofessional.
1 cojoco 2018-04-11
That's one of most reddit's most endearing features.
1 AnnArchist 2018-04-11
I just cant.
1 patapatapatapata 2018-04-11
Imagine hating shills and making a sub to point it out and also shill
1 HydroDragon 2018-04-11
Projection is a hell of drug apparently, very addictive.
1 GadolBoobies 2018-04-11
I'm never unprofessional to you guys.
1 Capital_Rope 2018-04-11
Actually, OP in that thread might just be the shill. Very shady.
1 patapatapatapata 2018-04-11
Shills shilling shills
1 shallowm 2018-04-11
/u/noisylettuce Sorry if I'm misunderstanding this crypto stuff, but isn't the sidebar speaking against Bitcoin Cash (the centrally controlled version of Bitcoin)? It's condemning the moderators for trying to break the functionality of btc (regular bitcoin), which would force people to upgrade to Bitcoin Cash, right?
1 SandorClegane_AMA 2018-04-11
You are forgiven for misunderstanding given that the text on their sidebar is badly worded. The phrasing is so tortuous because it is so partisan.
What they are doing is condemning the main bitcoin for in their eyes forcing them to use a minority fork, when main bitcoin folks didn't opt to change over to the new system that allows larger blocks. They then link to a sub and a FAQ that advocates for bitcoin cash.