/r/CringeAnarchy breaks down and signals the end of society as California sexEd class tells students about the gays.

106  2018-04-23 by McFluffTheCrimeCat

206 comments

/u/The_Saltlife has a cameo in there somewhere to.

Sure do soyboy

While this soy bs is gayer than Sam Hyde I do agree it is called pork roll

Thank you!

/u/The_SaltLife wrote:

And online schools. All of which are viable alternatives.

IMAGINE BEING THIS RETARDED

I am not sure which is more cringey, the litany of erroneous assumptions you splayed out or the act of calling upon the student archetype with the intent of derision. Anti-intellectualism, check. src

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, removeddit.com, archive.is

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

holy shit sam hyde was right. parents in california can't pull their kids out of a class that tells them to shove fruit up their asses.

The bill said age-appropriate, m8. Because teens are being taught propper sex ed instead of possibly endangering themselves (they're going to fuck regardless, m8.), obviously that means that primary schoolers will be taught to shove carrots up their bussies.

I'm not leaving what "age-appropiate" means up to the globohomo-industrial complex.

See, but their going by average mental age and maturity not accounting for the diminished mental age and maturity of fuckwits like LSU, Whiteymcwhatever and whatever cancertransplants from voat are clinging to the drama undercarriage.

There's never an appropriate age to learn anything by if you're dumb enough.

holy shit sam hyde was right. parents in california can't pull their kids out of a class that tells them to shove fruit up their asses.

It doesn't tell them that retard. It tells them that some fruits can be used as dildos and explains how to use them as such safely. Also you realize way more teen girls are going to use something as dildos than teen boys right?

imagine being ok with your teenage son or daughter being taught how to use dildos in school

libtards always trying to tempt me to turn gay

It all started when they put chemicals in the water that turns the freaking frogs gay.

Do you understand that?

To be fair that actually turned out to thing.

It wasn't making them gay, it was making them female. Like it changed their development.

Maybe they can for once tempt you to become tall?

And then transgender. I'm so triggered I'm literally shaking.

stupid sexy flanders

In 2040 young kids (under 10) will be forced to watch graphic interracial homo porn in schools (black man fucking white bois asshole of course). If you try say no as a parent there will be severe consequences. I guarantee you this. Screencap this, find a printer and print it out. Put it into your wallet and come back to me when you find that Whitey was right.

when you are so retarded people initially think you are a parody account

What's so retarded about it? It's 22 years in the future. Do you see which direction things are pointing right now?

Milko lives don't matter.

What's so retarded about it?

I first noticed the retardation in the following line kids (under 10) will be forced to watch graphic interracial"

You think that we don't want the extinction of the milko race by miscegenation?

that's the most boring kind of extinction

In 2040 there will be no more white bois

You're a good guy

black man fucking white bois asshole of course

This isn't true. Black dick is only compatible with black bussy.

sounds good to me

Why are you so triggered?

this is great news, now kids will learn about bussy much earlier!

Fresh bussy on the market.

Ah yes, because a screenshot of reallytruenews.com.net with the name of the website cropped out is not clickbait, and even if true the fringe people involved are obviously representive of sex ed teachers and leftists in general.

lol triggered

Inshallah

If you're sending your kids to indoctrination camps in post-2010, then your kid honestly deserves to be a homosexual.

Bussy > gussy,

im not finnish

Ill finnish all over your face tbh

It works. Take this guy.

https://youtu.be/L_Fqn2HJ1gk

10 years ago: "relax bigots, it's not like they're gonna come into elementary schools and tell the kids that that they should overdose on estrogen and cut their dicks off."

iirc There's a 1000 ways to day episode featuring a women masturbating with a carrot.

1000 ways to die was some freaky shit man

Ok, hold up. I know you're naive, but you've never heard about girls putting vegetables in their gussy? Ask anyone who works in an ER, that shit is surprisingly common. Honestly, it's a good tip to roll a condom around it so it doesnt cause problems when it breaks.

And you should read the source, by the way. It is not aimed at gay people alone. It is aimed at teens in general.

elementary school.

According to the bill it is about age-appropriate instruction. Show me examples of 5th graders being shown how to stuff a carrot in their ass and Ill agree it is weird, but nowhere in the bill does it say that this has to be taught in every year.

Even the Daily Caller isn't making this shitty argument.

age-appropriate instruction.

The clowns who run these classes are also declaring 3-year old toddlers "openly gay".

He, on his own, showed interest in those things.

Oh yeah, you'll sure convince me with a picture of an article.

Also in the bill:

The bill would instead require school districts to ensure that all pupils in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, receive comprehensive sexual health education and HIV prevention education, as specified.

Ah yes, because a screenshot of reallytruenews.com.net with the name of the news source cropped out is 1000% true and accurate. Even if it were, apparently you think that fringe views lexpressed by idiots on Twitter are representative of sex ed teachers in general.

What's it like to be so obviously retarded?

it's tough, but I get the good parking and retard money

Damn, that sounds sweet.

https://i.redd.it/cg5iqk95wit01.png

Lol I'd bet anything that's either fake or from a clickbait site

it is.

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

 If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

No, they did not make it legal to intentionally infect people with AIDS> They somewhat reduced the penalty for doing so, in light of medical advances making it no longer a death sentence.

Even ignoring how deeply it impacts the quality of life of the victims of the degenerate -- each AIDS infection causes >1$M dollars in medical costs.

What's the penalty in California for stealing a million dollars from the state?

Goalpost moving, eh?

Do you know what the penalty is in California if you steal a million dollars?

Actually it's more like robbery than theft.

Goalpost moving, eh? Also, that's kind of irrelevant. What I'm saying is that a decrease in penalty is justified because stealing a million dollars is morally better than killing someone. Sure, the law may be inconsistent, but a decrease in penalty is justified due to a decrease int he severity of the crime.

a decrease in penalty is justified because stealing a million dollars is morally better

you forgot about the part where the AIDS-rapist fucks up his victims whole life beyond the financial cost.

And the penalty for infecting someone with AIDS is now far less than that.

It's just a slap on the wrist.

No, it is not just a slap on the wrist, and no, that's still a decrease in serverity of crime from what amounts to murder,

So what is the punishment for intentionally infecting someone with AIDS in California?

20 hours community service?

Nah, 6 months jail. I don't agree with it no longer being a felony, but neither is it a slap on the wrist.

no longer being a felony

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

there we have it folks, directly from the horse's mouth!

So? It's a misdemeanor, not a felony. Transmitting SARS and Ebola is also a misdemeanor is Cali.

Transmitting Ebola is also a misdemeanor in California.

So you could intentionally infect a whole movie theater full of Californians with Ebola, and you'd get at most 6 months in jail???

The law's not that clear with regards to that. I don't have legal training, so I can't really tell you whether that would be the case. Terrorism charges start getting involved then, however.

even if you try and give a single person Ebola attempted murder or murder also gets involved.

Yup. That's how it should be with AIDS as well.

In San Francisco they can now infect whole middle schools with full-blown GRID, and it's not even a felony? LMFAO

You do realize that intentionally infecting someone with aids isn't actually going to result in 6 months prison time, right? It's probable that you'll end up sued by the victim, and when you start doing things like your example terrorism and other crimes get involved.

Also, it's telling that you call it GRID.

It's mostly gays, and people who have sex with black men.

GRID

God damn you're a retarded edge lord. It's hasn't been GRID in fucking years because it's now known to have nothing to do with being gay

It's hilarious waatching you people say stupid shit like this because you have no clue what you're talking about.

You know public health experts for years have said removing the stigma from HIV will reduce infection rates, correct?

Why are you in favor of higher HIV rates?

Do you have a source on that crock of bs?

A source for what?

Why do you think the law was signed?

It's the same situation with drug addiction. It needs to be treated as a public health issue, not a criminal issue. When people are afraid they'll be arrested, it discourages them from getting tested.

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/744369

Yeah... Your source is stuck behind a paywall. Good try. It's hilarious waatching you people say stupid shit like this because you have no clue what you're talking about.

You know public health experts for years >>have said removing the stigma from HIV will >>reduce infection rates, correct?

Show me a source that actually says this.

Why are you in favor of high HIV rates?

Nice ad miseracordium right here.

Yeah... Your source is stuck behind a paywall. Good try. It's hilarious waatching you people say stupid shit like this because you have no clue what you're talking about.

No, it's not behind a paywall.

Show me a source that actually says this.

You were already shown one, but i'll gladly put you in the dirt again.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/25450663/aep_2003_15_1.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1524494132&Signature=00QkevC8gFRw8TeNh4TIxoqhvug%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DInterventions_to_reduce_HIV_AIDS_stigma.pdf

Stigma and discrimination relating to HIV/AIDS (AIDS stigma) undermine public health efforts to combat the epidemic (Malcolm et al., 1998; UNAIDS, 2002; UNAIDS, 2000). AIDS stigma negatively affects preventive behaviors (e.g., condom use), HIV test-seeking behavior, care-seeking behavior on diagnosis, quality of care provided to HIV-positive patients, and perception and treatment of persons living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA) by communities, families, and partners (Gerbert, Macquire, Bleeker, Coates, & McPhee, 1991; Herek & Glunt, 1988; Herek, 1990; Macintyre, Brown & Sosler, 2001; Malcolm et al., 1998; Muyinda, Seeley, Pickering & Barton, 1997). One of the most surprising elements of AIDS stigma is its ubiquitous nature even where the epidemic is widespread and affecting so many people, such as in sub-Saharan Africa.Therefore, as many in the HIV/AIDS community note, decreasing AIDS stigma is a vital step in stemming the epidemic (Cameron, 2000; Goldin, 1994; Malcolm et al., 1998; UNAIDS, 2000b). Given this situation, it is critical that interventions that effectively reduce AIDS stigma be identified and implemented.

1

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Arjan_Bos/publication/23488383_Fear_of_Stigmatization_as_Barrier_to_Voluntary_HIV_Counselling_and_Testing_in_South_Africa/links/555339a708ae980ca606fd97.pdf

2

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3834870/

3

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/lamont/files/destigmatization_and_health_lamont_clair_daniel.pdf

4

https://prevention.ucsf.edu/library/stigma/

Should we keep going?

Nice ad miseracordium right here.

If someone is against policies to reduce the spread of HIV, what are they?

You know what? I read the articles and it's something that I haven't seen before. I take it back. Obviously I'm not against lowering HIV rates, but I couldn't rectify tour statement with what I thought was true. Thank you for bringing that to my attention.

That's a false dilemma. Totally ridiculous. People who intentionally infect their victims have to be punished. You can reduce the stigma of HIV at the same time.

That's why those "public health" experts are probably just activist bug chasers.

Why are you in favor of higher HIV rates?

Increases the chances of you getting ir

Giving someone Ebola is also a misdemeanor in California, is their an pro-Ebola agenda at work too?

It seems like California has a thing for psychos, who infect their victims with deadly diseases.

ven ignoring how deeply it impacts the quality of life of the victims of the degenerate

How does it feel to be a REEEEEEEEEtard?

each AIDS infection causes >1$M dollars in medical costs.

Hey retard, do you know why they changed the law? What am I saying of course you don't that would require you to question things. They changed the law because a bunch of people (mainly sex workers) were infected with HIV and refused to get tested because if they did they would be required to inform people they had HIV, which would mean no one would fuck them which would mean they'd go deeper into poverty.

The change in the law allows people like sex workers to get tested and treatment which helps to reduce the spread of HIV (Because it's rather hard to pass on if the person who has it is on their meds)

Hey retard, do you know why they changed the law?

lawmakers with a fetish for bugchasing or for pozzing negholes.

a bunch of people (mainly sex workers) were infected with HIV and refused to get tested because if they did they would be required to inform people they had HIV,

And now those degenerates, who knowingly infected thousands with AIDS, are off the hook! Good job California!

Instead the state should have introduced mandatory HIV testing for prostitutes, and punish not getting tested regularly to the same extent as they used to punish intentionally infecting people.

Yeah. Lawmakers with a fetish for bug-chasing or for pozzing negholes.

You are a walking billboard for why we need mayocide

And now those degenerates, who knowingly infected thousands with AIDS, are off the hook!

No, if you knowingly pass on HIV it's 6 months in jail and you can be sued for the cost of any medical bills. It's the exact same as if you passed on Ebola.

/u/ineedmorals (fitting user name haha) sorry to tell you, whypipo are the race that is by far the most accepting of sexual deviants -- and it's only thanks to (((early childhood education))) brainwashing them.

if you knowingly pass on HIV it's 6 months in jail

that's nothing!

If you hack off someone's foot and steal a million dollars, you go to prison for many years.

AIDS has a bigger impact on the life of your victims than losing a foot.

you can be sued for the cost of any medical bills

hahahaha as if they had any money.

You are literally illiterate. Take another look at their username and reevaluate your attempt at a sick burn.

sounds like you need morals as well HAHAHAHAHA

they did not make it legal

no longer a felony

And now a misdemeanor. Like SARS and Ebola is in California.

How do you manage to breathe

eta: “What if you don’t have time or money to buy sex toys?” the guide reads on page C-51. “Cucumbers, carrots, and bananas (with the peel) make great dildos. Just remember to use a condom!”

That's just sensible advice though and it's not like the kids weren't sodomizing themselves with groceries before anyway.

Why on earth would you put a condom on a vegetable?

Guess it's more sanitary and also if it should break.

Haven't you heard about the current romaine lettuce recall? I don't want no e coli in my bussy.

eta: “What if you don’t have time or money to buy sex toys?” the guide reads on page C-51. “Cucumbers, carrots, and bananas (with the peel) make great dildos. Just remember to use a condom!”

You realize they've been telling girls this for years right?

and see where that got us!

A lot less women had to go to the ER because they got a Cucumber stuck in their pussy?

They should be hurt doing so and should be denied treatment for their disorder as punishment.

wtf on you on about?

Anyone engaging in morally unfit behavior should be denied medical treatment as punishment.

Oh look a retard

Waaaaaaaaaah

Oh no, my delicate sensibilities :(((((((((

🍌🥒🥕🍆

Never change, /r/CringeAnarchy

Yes, I hope CA keeps exposing degenerate left.

If you think photoshopped articles and screenshots of reallytruenews.com.net with the publication name cropped out are exposing the degenerate left, you don't deserve to experience the pleasure of having your bussy massaged.

If you think photoshopped articles and screenshots of reallytruenews.com.net with the publication name cropped out

Who cares, reality is always more degenerate. It's almost like leftists use so called "fake news" as guidelines.

I'm right because reasons.

Noncentrists_IRL.

Well he's right that's stupid yes it should be a felony to intentionally infect someone with Aids you bug chasing weirdo. I just wish he wasn't right because he's a fucking loser

Why you gotta be such a bully >:(

what do you mean I'm wrong! Well it's probably true anyway shut up libcuck

gotem

What the fuck are you even trying to say?

Hitler did nothing wrong.Slippery slope is real.

poz

zle

It's almost like

Literally everyone who says this needs to go into the ovens.

No exceptions.

What the fuck is up with the recent influx of CA and MDE retards?

Milkos thinking that we're being ironic.

oh thats really funny people think we agree with them thats always the funniest WAIT DON'T GO YOUR DRAMA SUSTAINS US.

The fuck is up with rejects who got downvoted in SRD migrating here?

I mean he has a point there. Username aside obviously.

Still funny

oh definitely, I'd post to /r/facepalm if u cant murderbywords it

I thought that shit was hilarious

Oh I was already banned. Just a shame I can't post it there..

50% if not more of the comments are literally calling OP out on his bullshit and explaining that there is nothing about this to freak out about. For all the shit CA usually gets they are acting surprisingly mature about this

whatever fag

Fag? Really? What are you? 12?

ur mums 12

12 inches in my pants, maybe. Now bend over.

Oh let me guess, this entire sub is just full of 12 year olds who think they are the best because all they can do is troll in the internet? Cute.

Why did you choose the cringe anarchy lifestyle? Please explain.

I did not. They were on r/all and I wanted to see how much they were going to freak out over the article posted and was pleasantly surprised at how many comments called the OP an idiot. I am not subscribed to CA, I do not post in their and I tend to ignore them when they reach the front page

Intersting. How much you're afraid of the jews?

Not one bit

How is your goy bussy?

My what now?

Dear, /u/AnnArchist the Great. Ban this goy please.

The upvotes though.

Definitely a valid point

This is the case for every CA post that hits /r/all.

u/Mechanical-one

And no one is shocked that california is trying to force being faggots on kids.

Yes because as we all know being taught about homosexuality and how to engage in homosexual sex = being forced to be gay. And heterosexual sex ed is trying to force gays to be straight

u/Akhaian

Two men having sex is inherently dangerous.

No it's not.

If one of them is promiscuous it's more dangerous than shooting up

No it's not

They pass diseases around to each other at insane rates.

Do you just not understand how sex works? Here let me explain it. The reason that gay men have a higher rate of HIV transfer than other groups is largely owning to the lack of condom use (Which classes like this help with) and the fact that many gay men engage in anal sex. Condom-less anal sex with a women is just as likely to pass on HIV as with a man, something you'll know when you finally take health class next year

u/SMGB_NeonYoshi

LGBT activists are the biggest degenerates of the world.

The r/CringeAnarchy poster said, failing to see the irony.

And you gave a whopping 0 citations to your statements.

Classic stuff.

And you gave a whopping 0 citations to your statements.

I didn't bother because

1) None of the people I responded to did either

2) Because you're all a bunch of "feels > reals" retards who wouldn't believe anything I cited anyway

How are we "Feels > reals" in any way?

You unironically used the word degenerates

And you unironically use /r/drama so i wouldnt talk lol

yeah hating gays is definitely on the same level as that lol

NO U

No you both

Right-wing retards are the most "feels > reals" people out there lmao.

Agree to disagree I guess...

See? Again disagreeing with FACTS because of your FEELS.

Hint: A sub where people think not being college educated is a good thing (because university = evil leftist indoctrination) doesn't attract the brightest minds.

You have demonstrated no citations or evidence for your claims. Not a single claim you have made you have proven to be a "fact".

So no, I am not disagreeing with facts because of my feelings.

"Not a single claim" of my 1 claims was properly sourced, wew.

Facts are facts, whether I show evidence or not. 3000 years ago the earth was already round although none had proven it yet.

And I'm sure you apply similar rigor to claims your own side makes and not just to those you don't like 😚

Does you merely stating it to be a fact make it a fact? If so, what gives you that power and deprives me of that same power?

I'd say you seem too dense to not be a troll, but then again you unironically post on CA.

Facts are true whether I state them or not. However, since you're evidently pretty stupid your "facts" are much more likely to be wrong.

I am not arguing on whether or not a fact is true. I am arguing on whether or not what you have said is a fact.

Currently, your argument is "Republicans being reals over feels is a a true statement. It is a true statement because it is a fact. It is a fact because it is a true statement." Which is looped logic.

Why are you people always so eager to demonstrate your piss poor understanding of logic?

Currently, your argument is

No, I never made an argument to begin with.

At least you didn't cry "That's an ad hominem!!1!1!" when I called you stupid, so you seem to at least be smarter than the average right-wing retard. Which doesn't say much, but I guess it's something.

By the way, did you know that logic is a subfield of philosophy? And isn't philosophy just leftist indoctrination (postmodernism!1!!!1). Why do you like it so much?

1!

1! = 1

1!

1! = 1

1!!!

1!!! = 1

"Why are you people always so eager to demonstrate your piss poor understanding of logic?"

Your not even explaining why our understanding of logic is "piss "poor"...

"No, I never made an argument to begin with."

The definition of argument (appropriate to this situation) is: "a reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading others that an action or idea is right or wrong."

You made the reasoning that Republican ideas are wrong because they are 'reals over feels' people. When asked for evidence to defend this you made the second reasoning that it was a fact, and that facts are true even when there is no evidence supporting them.

This is more than one point of reasoning aiming for the same goal, thus making it a set. And because it is a set of reasonings aiming to persuade, then it is an argument.

If you believe this is a flaw in my logic on how what you have said would fit the dictionary definition of logic, or you believe the dictionary definition to be flawed, inform me.

"t least you didn't cry "That's an ad hominem!!1!1!" when I called you stupid, so you seem to at least be smarter than the average right-wing retard. Which doesn't say much, but I guess it's something."

Suppose for one second I did, what would be the problem with that?

"By the way, did you know that logic is a subfield of philosophy?"

No, I didn't. Interesting fact.

"And isn't philosophy just leftist indoctrination "

No. It's not.

"Why do you like it so much?"

Since it allows be to discern truth from lie and which ideas are superior and would help the world. Relying on it is what has made me a rightist.

1!

1! = 1

1!

1! = 1

Your not even explaining why our understanding of logic is "piss "poor"...

What an IMPRESSIVE observation Sherlock.

You made the reasoning that Republican ideas are wrong because they are 'reals over feels' people.

No, I didn't say that at all (although it's pretty true).

This is more than one point of reasoning aiming for the same goal, thus making it a set. And because it is a set of reasonings aiming to persuade, then it is an argument.

See, this is a perfect example of your piss poor understanding of logic:
The definition of an argument is pretty much the most basic thing in logic and you have no idea what it is.
An argument consists of premises that support a conclusion. This is what the colloquial definition you thought would be "appropriate in this situation" means by reasoning. I didn't make any arguments - in colloquial terms I didn't give any reasonings for my ideas - I just made a bunch of statements (ideas).
Example:

CA posters are stupid.
Stupid people are wrong on a lot of issues

Conclusion: CA posters are wrong on a lot of issues.

Now compare that to:

Right-wing retards are the most "feels > reals" people out there lmao.

See the difference?

And because it is a set of reasonings aiming to persuade,

Persuading you is certainly not my aim. I just think you are pretty entertaining.

Suppose for one second I did, what would be the problem with that?

Okay here's some FREE education for you. An ad hominem is a fallacious argument where a premise is just an insult and doesn't point to the conclusion at all.
Here's an exercise for the reader (you): Given the explanation of an argument above, why is "you're stupid as fuck" not an ad hominem? A more difficult question: Why is the argument I gave as an example above still not an ad hominem?

No, I didn't. Interesting fact.

I'll forgive this gross lack of education because you're still a child.

No. It's not.

A bunch of your buddies would disagree.

Since it allows be to discern truth from lie and which ideas are superior and would help the world. Relying on it is what has made me a rightist.

At least your naivety is adorable.

You named yourself after a gay Mongolian dinosaur for toddlers, you really have no basis to call other people degenerates

Are you referring to my user name?

Are you a furry? It's okay to come clean, this is a safe space.

No, and you didn't answer my question.

is neon yoshi your husbando? Either way, if you're a grown man who identifies with a gender queer cartoon velociraptor, you probably aren't vet well adjusted.

I came up with the name when I was like 10. So no.

So, a couple years ago?

Six.

Lmao you can't make this up

Lmao you can't make this up

To be fair, if you asked the average /r/CringeAnarchy user about their age, they'd probably actually make it up. Props to this one for telling the truth.

You're 16? No wonder you're such a complete retard who thinks he knows everything. For fucks sake you've likely literally not even taken anything but the most basic sex ed class

if you're 16 you should probably just shut the fuck up and concentrate on doing well in school since it sounds like you're very close to ending up a white trash weeb doing jack shit in his 20's

Citations are for losers, bussy-haters losers, and seriousposters losers.

Yes because as we all know being taught about homosexuality and how to engage in homosexual sex = being forced to be gay. And heterosexual sex ed is trying to force gays to be straight

So why exactly do kids need to know how to put cocks in their ass.

It serves no purpose other than making an attempt to push an end result.

Get your overly offended head of your ass you dumb fuck.

So why exactly do kids need to know how to put cocks in their ass.

Why do kids need to know how to put cocks in pussys? Because they're doing to do it anyway and it's best if they do it safely.

It serves no purpose other than making an attempt to push an end result.

Yes, that end result being few STIs being spread.

Get your overly offended head of your ass you dumb fuck.

He said, not realizing he was the offended one here

You sound offended

You think you'd try gay stuff if you were taught about it in school?

Not liking bussy

Peak faggotry my man.

You remind me a lot of the pearl-clutching evangelicals of the 90s.

It’s pretty funny actually.

How do you agendapost this hard about other people’s gay sex lol

Why are straight white men so fragile?

The reason that gay men have a higher rate of HIV transfer than other groups is largely owning to the lack of condom use (Which classes like this help with) and the fact that many gay men engage in anal sex.

You left out that gay men tend to be much more promiscuous than straight men.

The Dutch study of partnered homosexuals, which was published in the journal AIDS, found that men with a steady partner had an average of eight sexual partners per year.

and

Bell and Weinberg, in their classic study of male and female homosexuality, found that 43 percent of white male homosexuals had sex with 500 or more partners, with 28 percent having one thousand or more sex partners.

and

In their study of the sexual profiles of 2,583 older homosexuals published in the Journal of Sex Research, Paul Van de Ven et al. found that "the modal range for number of sexual partners ever [of homosexuals] was 101-500." In addition, 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent had between 501 and 1,000 partners. A further 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent reported having had more than one thousand lifetime sexual partners.

Basically if you are gay and can't get laid, then you are a sad little man.

Sometimes I wish I was gay

same tbh

yeah this is basically true if you are gay and can't get laid you really are honestly lying because most gays I meet have pretty low standards and going for fat heavy guys isn't considered weird because bears are a legit attraction.

serioulsy if you can't get laid as a gay guy how the fuck are you alive seriously we will fuck anything.

Bell and Weinberg, in their classic study of male and female homosexuality, found that 43 percent of white male homosexuals had sex with 500 or more partners, with 28 percent having one thousand or more sex partners.

So we should turn all the incels gay?

They'd still be incels.

Meh. I'm the most "le anti-sjw gamer xd" kind of person you can think of, but it's time for me to unsubscribe from CA.

Fuck that place. They have become the cringe.

yeah I mean I went there and the cringe was within tolerable limits but this oh honey no you went full on anti-sjw moron and decided to reach full on homophobia this is just the same kind of shit I used to hear when I was younger in texas.

CringeAnarchy is itself a source of cringe and they rarely ever notice.

I stopped going when they treated twerking as something new when the term twerk is new not the dance.

they lack self awareness and most importantly humor they do not get jokes are satire.

Because education is powerful and idiots are scared of it. Also, "If I ignore this tumor, it'll go away!"

but why do you know how many gay kids get tricked by pozzie scene fuckers, and older rapey daddies, and other horrible people because they don't understand anything why hurt your kid worse than ever.

Well, I'm sure if you were to ask one of the lovely edgetards over at CA, they'd say the gay kid deserved it "for being a fag degenerate". A lot of conservatives would probably agree on that.

great as if our suicide rate isn't high enough.

Sounds to me like you're a paid shariablue soros-cohen shill. What are you gonna do, do something ridiculous like call me a russian bot?

Also you're too offended by what's posted there, chill. Fucking California is literally forcing our kids to be gay look at this reactionary outrage-inducing post with no context.

A large portion of the stuff posted there isn't even cringe, it's just content for people to get outraged over. How is this "cringe"?

Also, here's a /r/CringeAnarchy user intimating that his wife kisses his children goodnight with his cum on her lips (instead of someone else's cum).

That last one is truly bizarre. That's a weird little world that motherfucker lives in.

Damn, that top comment actually made me chuckle a bit. Wtf I love CA now???

You are retarded if you think private schools participate in indoctrination. The only reason public schools get away with what they do is because most kids have no alternatives.

How could you possibly believe this? Aren't most private k12 schools religious? Or does dude just not mind the Christian indoctrination?

u/Akhaian can you please tell me about the inherent dangers of homo-sex? But do it, like, really slowly.

With all the "tap water" in schools, I am surprised there are any straight kids left.

What age kids are we talking here?

Good time to give a shit, fucko parents.