It's shit like this that makes my life worse as a Eurasian because even if you look amazing you're still a subhuman because Asian women happily marry guys who look like they've been in industrial accidents over an Asian guy. It makes Asian looking males look like the worst fucking losers on earth. The guy is absolutely offensive to look at. Like his face literally makes my stomach churl because he's so ugly. I'd even be mad if he had a white girlfriend People feel they have the liberty to say of course your dad is white. Because white guys see shit like this where some fucking quasimodo looking freak can get Asian girls and they use it as ammo as to how shittyy asian guys are...

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, removeddit.com, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

That thread was a fucking wreck. I can't believe how much responsibility and agency some people want to strip from women.

I feel like this is where feminists show their true colors. They sound more like lobbying groups for women who wanted disproportionately advantageous rights to themselves instead of equalitarianism.

sound like

Yeah because that is exactly what they are.

It's little more than femdom.

you wish. so many guys have these femdom society fantasies with dix in their hands while talking about feminism, clearly being closet submissives.

Well, to be fair, even if we ignored judging feminism on it's actions, it's not like the name didn't give it away.

-ism

a suffix indicating a doctrine, system, or body of principles and practices

Feminism is literally an ideology that revolves around female supremacy. It's in the name.

Not too dissimilar from EA Sports - if you know what I mean.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greentext/comments/8fau8h/anon_likes_a_girl/

And then everyone clapped! 👏👏👏

Fraudulent and latent homosexual

Is people hooking up at bars, clubs, and parties one long socially accepted rape-fest to you? Just want to make sure I'm understanding you. [-13]

I think it's a pretty stupid idea but generally they go in with some kind of idea of the night they wanna have. [+13]

/u/PelagianEmpiricist with the casual victim-blaming. SMDH

I mean, sure, if that's what you want.

Next your gonna tell me Harvey Weinstein's victims knew what they were getting themselves into. Misogynists are so predictable...

I always knew it wound be a lawn gnome that would make my sphincter pucker in fear of shaken feminism

#TheFutureIsFemale

But is she naked? I can fap to thst

Wow, you misogynists really don't think women are useful for anything besides fulfilling your sexual desires.

It's true. Right now I'm just hoping you're a sexy lady gnome.

Gussy🤢🤢🤢

Shit I'm not meme savvy enough to know what that means

They can also be useful for making sandwiches and fetching a beer.

do u have any friends

https://i.imgur.com/hbeS72W.jpg

"lesbians"

Is there a stereotype of a 'lesbian' that they need to conform you to address the issue at hand? Women who hook up with drunk guys or drunk girls are rapists. Literally 75-80% of my female friends are rapists.

Given that the issue at hand was addressed by me in the original thread saying "I'm not sure because I haven't enough evidence to come to a strong conclusion", I figure shitposting is all that's merited.

I figure shitposting is all that's merited.

Oh you will fit in great here.Welcome to the /r/drama community.

Awwww you guuuuuys ❤️

It's very simple. You are asserting that consent can not be given while intoxicating. It is a laughably self-evident fact that sober women having sex with drunk men happens all the time, which, under said definition of rape, makes those women rapists. This is obvious to anyone with two brain cells to rub together, however you retards refuse to admit it. You know it's true, though, so you keep deflecting with these lame attempts at jokes. Why? What is the point?

blackout girl cannot rape. blackout boy can rape. lesbians and trans.... ?

thanks, law and society, for being "clear" on things.

Who are you to say they're not? Not all lesbians wear doc martins and have fashy haircuts.

Your comment is v v problematic for non gender non conforming lesbian women.

Yeah they are too pretty

Just wondering, if the anon in that story decided to lie unmoving in the bed, would he still be committing rape?

The same question goes for /u/MuellHaufen:

Solid logic. Drunk girl comes onto you, you go along with it, you're raping her? Holy shit.

Why don't you go familiarise yourself with consent, my guy.

Don't drag me back into that, I deleted my comments because I was tired of explaining (the apparently difficult concept) to people that if someone is drunk, everything else does not matter, they cannot consent.

Just don't fucking rape people, kids.

can you answer my question tho

Nah, not getting into it.

😞

Yup, sorry.

Nice incel spinoff of SRD, by the way, real classy.

I think it's a pretty stupid idea

Am I understanding this correctly? This person thinks going to parties, clubs, or bars to have fun with your friends is a 'pretty stupid idea'?

Isn’t everyone’s idea of fun arguing angrily with people on reddit??

HEY FUCK YOU BUDDY 😠😠☠😠☠☠☠😠

MOTHER FUCKER

Srdines don't have friends, they communicate with other smug people, that's it.

When you grandstand so much you forget your past...smh

they post on srd soooo

Funny how SRDines argue about sex so much considering they never get any.

Wrong again. Ever hear of Tulpas? Bye felicia

When you wanna fuck but your tulpa think you too beta.

They're male feminists. They've probably raped more girls than you've ever talked to.

u/que-hegan can you find anything else that being drunk would be an excuse. I.E. I shot a guy but I was shit faced so I'm free to go. If a woman can't concent if she's drunk then a dude cant rape if he's drunk as both are not in their right mind.

If a woman's blackout drunk and about to pass out she can't really consent

Contra Doe v. Ohio State University (No. 2:15-cv-02830-JLG-CMV) (S.D. Ohio, Apr. 24, 2018) (denying defendant's motion for summary judgment on qualified-immunity grounds), wherein a federal court just ruled on this literally this week (link to the full opinion at bottom of article), holding that college defendants should be able to present expert evidence that (allegedly) blacked-out people could consent.

I am way too stupid and drunk to understand this but i am interested

please dumb it down

"Intoxicated" (i.e., drunk) people can consent to things. "Incapacitated" (i.e., stone-cold unconscious or darned close to it) can't. "Blacked-out" people are a maybe? Because they're walking around and talking even though they might not remember it the next day -- and it's not like humans come equipped with a "drunkenness meter" in the middle of their foreheads that their potential partners can consult to see if they are on solid legal ground if some hooking-up happens.

The actual case is pretty messed-up. A woman who failed her first year of med school got to re-take that year (I'm confused how that happens, but whatever). When she got back to school for her second try, she hooked-up with another med student after having ~6 drinks in 8 hours. They were cool all year until she failed medical school a second time and suddenly claimed at her expulsion meeting that she was failing because teh rapez (same as "Jackie" at UVA). OSU med school gave the woman a third try at retaking her first-year classes (b/c teh rapez) and kicked-out the guy while hiding the suspicious timing of these events and effectively barred him from ever working as a doctor in the US. Allegedly.

Intoxicated people can consent, I don't disagree. This case seems fucked up and she wasn't traumatized but even still, blacked out is iffy and at some point you can't comprehend what you're agreeing to

I find this pretty compelling, sufficient to make me reconsider my position about consent and insobriety. Thanks. I mean it.

Thanx captain

Hope the university administrators shit themselves

I think a drunken mandatory participation orgy would solve this dilemma. If nobody consents, that means EVERYBODY consents.

so a woman tries to force a man to have sex for thirty minutes after he tells her no repeatedly, and somehow the man is the rapist? peak srd

Only people with penises can rape! Except trannies, who are actually women.

TERFs beg to differ.

the man is the rapist? peak srd

ayy lmao what did you expect?

The man is always the rapist

It's so mind numbingly dumb when two SRDine "lawyers" try to argue the law in the comments. Bonus points when the one who actually seems to be a real lawyer is getting downvoted while someone who is arguing from wiki articles and is an expert in the law because they know "high level British judges" because they did some IT work for the courts once is getting upvoted.

I originally got banned from WorldNews years ago for arguing that with a mod.

They declared that it's illegal in the US to have sex with someone who's drunk and so I asked them to point out the law, as there is literally no law that states being drunk removes consent for sex.

They kept insisting it's true, tried to claim they meant the UK (again, literally no laws there either) and then banned me over it.

Bonus points when the one who actually seems to be a real lawyer is getting downvoted while someone who is arguing from wiki articles and is an expert in the law because they know "high level British judges" because they did some IT work for the courts once is getting upvoted.

This is literally every conversation about the law on reddit.

And why my lawyer ass now refuses to comment on anything law-related. There's always a sophomore community-college CS major out there who thinks that he has used Logic & Reason^TM to prove why all of constitutional law is wrong.

A question - what if drunk woman ask to have sex, you know with words, because a glass of wine or two can count as drunk to a SRDine?

If I'm drunk and I ping someone with a sentence that can be interpreted as "kys" am I still subjet to a ban? /u/snallygaster please advise.

probably. :(

np, /u/annoysthegoys assures me that if someone else does the pinging and the lolcows takes the bait, then I can swoop in and kyspost to my heart's content 😌

Just keep it safe

Sounds like a certain group of 'people' need a designated pinger.

If you kill someone drunk driving, you are responsible, even t hough you cannot consent to driving a car.

It really pisses me off when people point that out and feminists immediately jump to "nobody forced her into a car though! she was still raped while drunk while she consented to get in the car!"

Bitch, when the discussion is LITERALLY about whether or not you CAN consent while drunk.

You can be raped while drunk, as you can both give and deny consent.

It's like saying "we need to figure out whether or not she was raped first before we decide if he did it" and them screaming "I can't believe you want to question a rape victim!"

What kind of retard takes greentext stories this seriously?

ALL drunk sex is rape. It's so sad that people don't understand this.

/u/Therekrerf

So if someone takes a shot are they now unable to consent to sex? Is there a BAC threshold, like driving a car, or is there a sobriety test that we can use to determine if someone is sober enough to consent to sex?

Yes, it's that simple. Drunk = rape = many years in prison or, hopefully, the death penalty in certain states.

I notice you don't mention the treatment of the corpse. If you're happy to allow an internment in consecrated ground you're no better than a rape-apologist.

Corpses very rarely run away and so have no need to be interned.

Sardines are not real human beings

Prove me wrong

4Chan

It's actually 4-Chan.

This would never happen if it was Bussy.