I might be missing something, this is just some dude’s blog post. An interesting post, but I don’t see the drama. There’s one comment down in the comment section that looks mad but that’s it
And yeah this sub is hopelessly tech-illiterate I’m afraid though I appreciate the optimism
I admit it's not traditionnal drama, because we only have one side of the fucking moronic argument (>Imagining c++ will break backward compatibility lol), but it's still drama.
7 comments
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-05-16
/u/TheEquimanthorn
1 TheEquimanthorn 2018-05-16
What is it, I don't get it. 😔
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-05-16
Java street shitters have taken over and now they want equal to not verify the object but only the reference.
1 colonel-o-popcorn 2018-05-16
There isn’t any drama here, and also this is going to go way over the heads of most posters here
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-05-16
Fam, the drama over wether equal should verify the reference or the object is great.
Don't make me sad.
1 colonel-o-popcorn 2018-05-16
I might be missing something, this is just some dude’s blog post. An interesting post, but I don’t see the drama. There’s one comment down in the comment section that looks mad but that’s it
And yeah this sub is hopelessly tech-illiterate I’m afraid though I appreciate the optimism
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-05-16
I admit it's not traditionnal drama, because we only have one side of the fucking moronic argument (>Imagining c++ will break backward compatibility lol), but it's still drama.