/r/Gendercritical objects to law-abiding male citizens

92  2018-05-17 by [deleted]

119 comments

We can submit quotes?

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, removeddit.com, archive.is*

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

Men do like to give the impression that the only thing holding them back from being savage beasts is the law.

They love to have their cake and eat it too, given how often they simultaneously insist that men are the 'rational' and 'less emotional' sex.

Petulant twats, just makes you wanna punch them.

/u/lmaotitle, no one's stopping you from doing this, so feel free to go ahead.

Except the law, of course.

and my dick if you know what i mean

Please explain

nigga finna dab on some hoes

I don't follow the law, only feminist morality

Kek

Everyone loves to have their cake and eat it too.

Aww, I see I touched a nerve, so much so that you decided to directly reference me. Do you have a crush? lol

You folks should hope on someone else's dick.

should hope on someone else's dick

Your feminine penis just so happens to pique my interests.

It doesn't really work in your 20s though. I'm almost 28 (September 13) and so for me that would be 21. Which seems like a child to me. I think the youngest woman I could date without feeling super creepy would be like 23/24.

Wanker

You are back. Come here for a hug, pedo.

says he isn't a pedo

posts anime

You're lucky we live in a post-ironic society

howtopronounceephebophile.vid

Thinking teenagers can be attractive is really not the same as being a pedo though. I mean who doesn't like Japanese highschool girls dressed up in a sailor fuku, I assume nobody, I haven't asked but I'm sure that's the case.

Ok you win. Japanese highschoolers in sailor Fukus are an innate desire of the human race since the dawn of time.

this but unironically

I mean that's really just a subset of the Catholic schoolgirl fetish, except for weebs

Sailor outfit adds that masculine aspect that really nohomos my homo, if you know what I mean

21

pedo

🤔

fugg

depressed christmas cake teachers, desperate for a boyfriend, love, and marriage who drink themselves to sleep every night, slowly destroying their liver and succumbing to crippling alcoholism.

Not really waifu material, for me at least.

This is the real crime here. Kuroi-sensei best grill.

Not liking Christmas Cakes is just objectively bad taste.

Why are people these days so shallow about age in relationships? Admittedly, I prefer someone closer to my age, but if I get along with somebody and feel a connection to them (or if they at least have a nice ass) I am totally willing to go lower.

I'm not single but I'm at an age where significantly higher is starting to get wrinkly but significantly lower is a bunch of insufferable college students. Neither choice is really that appealing.

Why are people these days so shallow about age in relationships?

Because they are adult children

Loser. I dated a 27 year old like a month after my 18th birthday. It was fun. Concern about "muh power imbalances" is a spook.

The age/2+7 rule says 21 is good to go for a 28 year old!

The age 18 rule makes more sense tbqh

I thought it was just age/2.

This is some weird thing I see on reddit all the goddamn time. Whenever someone casually mentions an older guy dating a woman in her early 20s, there's a fucking mad rush of dudes to proudly proclaim that they "just couldn't date a girl that young" and "need someone close to my own age." It's like they're trying to show off to the cat lady demographic of reddit.

Not only that but you have the cat ladies REEEEEEEEEEEEEE'ING about how it's fucked up if you date or bump uglies with someone younger.

It's so hilarious when that shit comes up in r/datingoverthirty

it's just neckbeards trying to say to m'ladies that they are gentlemens.

imagine being so deluded that you think someone in their early 20s is a literal child compared to you in your late 20s. everyone in their 20s is stupid, who cares.

also the only dudes who virtue signal that they wouldn't fuck hot girls in their prime, can't do it anyway, and are just convincing themselves that the experience would be horrible.

yikes

Absolutely problematic

Could someone unironically explain to me the main point of that post?

It's just a thread full of people who are acting like they can't comprehend that people would do things if those things were legal. They act like that because it makes them look like they're on some inhuman moral level that's way above everyone else.

I can't believe the law is the only thing stopping some men from robbing banks.

TY😜

I can't believe the law is the only thing stopping some men from robbing banks.

Maybe not you, but I'd be robbin' the fuck outta banks if it weren't against the law...

I know. Everyone would. Even the idiots in that thread would if they ever left their homes.

When I see comments like these, it makes me wonder why no one in the Purge films ever do this, but instead settle on a free-for-all deathmatch in the streets.

I'm not wasting any of my time caving in skulls when I could raid every home in Beverly Park without legal repercussions.

First, reeing about laws being an expression of a people's culture and morals, and that men would have the to temerity to say so. Then the last paragraph suddenly jumps from men defending tradition and rule of law, to men being dogs only collared by the law.

Relatively reasonable, I'd say.

TY😘

Imagine being a man AND having money too. Then you have full immunity and power to rape and murder young girls.

wew lass

wew trash. seriously that sub is a collective of human garbage

SERIOUS POSTERS OUT OUT OUT

Zoop Zoop

Men really are inferior in so many ways, it's just mind-boggling that humanity at large cannot recognize it and acknowledge it.

Oi /u/lairacunda, whether society realizes it or not is of no importance. What matters is who controls the power to make change. If you want that powerً, you're welcome to try and wrest it from men's (genetically stronger and more aggressive) hands.

Who are these people kidding? Lesbian separatism is literally "GAMERS RISE UP" for Veronica's delusional female admirers.

Lesbian separatism is literally "GAMERS RISE UP" for Veronica's delusional female admirers.

That's an hot take I can get behind.

Not a hot take and neither are they. If they were not they wouldn't be bitching about men on Reddit like obese cat ladies.

like obese cat ladies.

As if they aren't actually obese cat ladies?

I had a typo.

Not a hot take

Yes, we are aware, you don't understand what banter is.

I just needed a reason to work hot in.

Yes, we are aware, you don't understand what banter is.

We live in a soxiety

Men are so inferior they're in charge of most massive corporations and relevant countries

Men are so inferior all it takes is politicized nagging to make them commit suicide.

Techincally true tho

That settles it then, as soon as i get rich first thing i'll do is turn into Ted Bundy.

My nigga Rousseau finna dab on these fools

r/gendercritical - “Morality extends beyond ideological genealogies”

Foucault dabs

/u/xNotch how it feel my dude?

i do?

alright time to have some fun.

Who has time to read that when there's all this rapin' to do?

I mean, I'm just a man so I can't control myself and I was born a rape machine or whatever.

u/throwaway949508

stating essentially that it's okay to rape (his words were "have sex with") a 16 year old as an adult man where age of consent laws in state were at 16 years old for girls (as opposed to 18 in other states) because it's legal.

If it's legal and consensual it's not rape

u/scienceisarealthing

Women can never hate men as much as they hate us

Lol most men (The vast majority in fact) don't hate women, you just think they do because you love being the victim.

as a thought experiment, imagine what men would do if it was the purge & laws no longer existed.

Hunt and murder other men?

u/dizzyOnQTrain

Men have low emotional intelligence.

Where as terfs just have low intelligence

If it's legal and consensual it's not rape

That's where you're wrong! If it's something they consider immoral then it's rape. Raping raper!

They do not get what consent is sadly.

u/scienceisarealthing

I hate women more than I probably should, but I couldn't even hold my own in a bizarro-world version of GC

She kind of makes a good point

That Saudi Arabia has the right idea about women?

DO 👏 NOT 👏 DOWNVOTE 👏 THE 👏 😂🐮

am not a lolcow

but u were downvoted

Or, just maybe, laws reflect the culture and beliefs of the population.

u/scienceisarealthing

imagine what men would do if it was the purge & laws no longer existed.

I think you would be highly disappointed. The purge was a retarded movie because it ignores what would actually happen; people would just shoot anyone trying to murder-rape because most people think murder-rape is kind of a dick move. There's a reason why those are basically the first rules any society establishes.

I mean, generally they would have to stay back to ... you know... protect the majority of women who cannot defend themselves.

They ignore thousands of years of philosophical debate about ethics in order to make these dumb generalisations. It's so fucking dumb. Not even offensive, just really dumb.

Replace "men" with "black people" and GenderCritical turns into coontown

imagine what men would do if it was the purge & laws no longer existed.

https://i.imgur.com/yjVn1qg.jpg

/u/apocalomnibus

I think there's a not-insignificant percentage of law-abiding men out there who would rape children if the legislation legalizing it were passed tomorrow.

/u/Voomsplan

I think given entirely free reign, most men would fuck little girls. Theyre sick, disgusting beasts and I frankly pity heterosexual women.

You two are just one dick away from being male oppressor. I can smell the white woman priviledge off those comments.

and then we have this genius

/u/aslak123

Have you not seen the videos of dads being inches away from attacking perps in court. The law protects these people from being lyched and tortured, while it often fails to protect the children being abused.

The law is not a superhero going around literally stopping crimes before they happen.

I would love to mansplain in more detail how wrong you are but you would probably find some dumb excuse to not listen to me.

I never said the law was a superhero going around stopping crimes before they happening. Please do mansplain in more detail how i am wrong.

I was reffering to corruption btw, it's not like pedophiles actually don't get the book thrown at them.

You infer that it's wrong to not lynch and torture pedophiles on the street while also implying that the law (without even referring to a particular country) is a failure. You don't explain why. So I imagine it's because it doesn't magically shield children from harm.

Which is a nice thought but it's not possible. All the law can do is describe behaviours that should be punished. Like lynching and torture.

I was referring to corruption

No you didn't. and if you did, you were not very good at it.

No, i absolutely think lynching anyone is wrong. What i am saying is that it would happen was it not for the law. I said the law often fails. That does not mean that the law in its entirety is a failure. SpaceX often fail their launches to.

I was reffering to coruption, as well as a fair amount of other things, such as lack of evidence, the difficulty in getting children to speak up about abuse, secrecy, and the community protecting pedophiles by not working with police. The law often fails, but that does not mean its always the fault of the law.

Did you honestly think i said pedos deserve torture. If I had I might not have been banned from r/gendercritical.

I get what you were trying to say now. It's not a very well thought argument, but I still misconstructed it. Have fun.

Tbf lynching pedos wouldn't be wrong.

Until you do it to someone innocent.

No pedo is innocent.

A trial is the means society has come up with for judging a persons guilt or innocence. Skip that step because you're impatient for your little sadistic show and you're guaranteed to eventually kill someone innocent.

Fuck em, Ye

Fuck em, Ye

Demonstrate the proper techniques.

we can just start judging people's guilt/innocence by whether they get lynched, or not. Problem solved.

Yes obviously. I mean someone who is not a pedo....

We'll thoroughly check whether they have a history of watching anime or not

Please do mansplain in more detail how i am wrong.

You are wrong. I have a penis.

So do I.

feminine penis?

Then quit bitching.

Wew what a seriouspost

I said I would mainsplain and I am a man of my word.

I tried to keep it as pathetic as possible

Serious posters are the best at drumming up drama. Frankly I’m glad we have them

I think there's a not-insignificant percentage of law-abiding men out there who would rape children if the legislation legalizing it were passed tomorrow.

No duh, there is definitely a population of pedophiles or people who lean that way who'd give no qualms about screwing a child if it weren't for the law. Maybe 5% or so of men (or ~2/3 of redditors). Good thing we have the law right!

literally everyone who watches anime would rape kids IRL if it was legal.

/u/dizzyonqtrain hey, I actually learned in college that statistically white American men are pretty good at handling ambiguity in their lives because of the culture they insulate themselves into

How is this drama?

We just like to check up on our sistersub every once in a while

Sorry for my biological urge to mate with nubile vagina owning young women.

I know, right? TERFs being jelly of younger women is like a recurring theme there.

ANIME IS FOR PEDOS

ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS

ALL WHITES ARE RACIST

YOU MAY NOT LIKE IT BUT THIS IS WHAT PEAK FACT LOOKS LIKE

GenderCritical objects to male citizens

Ftfy

/u/lairacunda

Men really are inferior in so many ways, it's just mind-boggling that humanity at large cannot recognize it and acknowledge it. Women really should be in charge of society b/c we have an innate moral authority that men will never have.

Does it follow that there are ways men are superior to women? Is there no place for rigid order when building society?

Yes, I get that there are sadistic men, but i’m talking about regular men.

Their goal is to completely enslave women, which they have done before and are actively doing now, and I get it about reproduction. But there seems to be a real fear and hate for women. I don’t understand it.

She hates men but seeing from her comments she also gave birth (out of her vagina as she claims), so how does this work? is it hate fuck extreme? What if she gave birth to a boy, a future rapist and a slave owning misogynist by default?

It's simple, when her son grows up he's going to chop his dick off. That's if she doesn't commit infanticide before then

just imagine

/u/lairacunda If your moral rule leads to people like you being in charge, of what value is the rule?