Bill Gates is not a workhorse, he's an owner and a clever investor.
Jesus Christ, imagine not believing Bill Gates isn't a workhorse. His work ethic was insane from pretty much the minute he was born and he's beyond brilliant. It's not like he inherited some giant company, he did all the initial work.
Bill gates had access to highly efficient computers (in his university) when no one else did, he was born to a rich highly educated family, etc etc... I'm not saying he didn't work hard, but many people who do don't get shit for it.
Nobody is using Marx's shit to establish socialism you idiot. We know times have changed, hell he didn't even know there would be a middle class. That doesn't make our shit invalid. That's like saying because some dumb guy likes capitalism your argument for it is wrong.
Not really. The boss is likely smarter and harder working than those under him/her
/u/donkeveryflop it's not about working smarter or harder. It's about how well he can manage his company. It takes intelligence but it also takes leadership skills that are taught to them. You're right about everything else.
Pretty sure when he dropped out of college he didn’t have thousands of software engineers working for him. That’s the difference between someone that smart and that driven and the average person. It takes a special person to be able to do what he did. There’s a reason why he made it to the top. The average person doesn’t have his intelligence or his work ethic.
i thought you were saying that his employees need him more than he needs them. they can just go work for any of the other thousands of tech companies in america. he needs to attract/keep talent
as smart as the dude is, it takes more than one super smart guy to run a successful company
The vast majority of Bill Gates income comes from rent as a product of owning Microsoft, not income provided to him as a reward for his talents. Actually he doesn't do anything but subsist off of rent these days.
Almost everyone busts their ass. Work ethic isn't unusual or special. The difference between have and have-nots is almost entirely determined by where the starting line is and whether or not you're lucky enough to have someone give you a boost.
A dirt poor worker in some factory working himself to death will never make more than the corporate boss who sits around with his inherited money doing nothing. Stop lying to yourself. You capitalists are so naive...
No shit, but that doesn't mean everyone's outcome in life is mostly or even heavily determined by their starting point. It's obviously a mix of both, but in the US, nothing is stopping you but yourself from striking it rich. Capital and investment are pretty easy to come by and the internet makes starting businesses or new ideas easier than ever. I did it at 24 after pitching investors and never looked back.
Most people work hard. You have no examples or logical patterns or evidence to say anything. You are just repeating your thesis. You obviously are a victim of the survivor bias too.
the corporate boss who sits around with his inherited money doing nothing
This is a cartoonish view of the world. Management in the US is extremely stressful and cutthroat. The difference between a great and average CEO can mean billions for a company.
corporate boss who sits around with his inherited money doing nothing
Corporate managers work incredibly long hours. Its much more stressful and competative than an assembly line worker, and the difference between a good one and bad one means millions/billions more for the company.
It's more of the unfortunate fact that while hard work does not mean getting rich, getting rich* and staying so means hard work. Whether it be through legitimate leadership/management or illegitimate bribery and crime. This applies to both capitalist and socialist societies.
Nobody likes gulags. Nobody likes stalin. Stalin ruined the ussr. The gulags were a product of dictatorship. And no, communism being instable was not the reason a dictator like Stalin could come into power. It was because the government and by extention country was attacked politically on all sides.
The modern socialist movement speaks fairly highly of him, and denounces all criticism of him as counter-revolutionary.
The gulags were a product of dictatorship
And filled entirely with people who were accused of crimes against communism.
communism being instable was not the reason a dictator like Stalin could come into power
No, a ruler like Stalin could come into power because Lenin had already created repressive mechanisms Stalin could make use.
It was because the government and by extention country was attacked politically on all sides.
Funny how every attempt at communism seems to blame its inevitable failure on "attacks from outside forces" which usually amounts to "Uh yeah... we won't accept your currency because your price controls don't reflect its true value, so no goods for you"
But I'm sure this was all sufficient reason for Stalin to play musical chairs with murderous henchmen who he then had murdered and replaced with other murderers. And I don't know about you, but when someone criticizes capitalism, I rape and murder young women then bury them in my front yard, Beria style.
Didn't you here no one every falls down ever. No one in the history of the universe has had a good start in life but found themselves unable to succeed in any measurable way. nope once you have money, you're always money. And as we all know celebrities never lose battles to depression in spite of the support around them....nope, never happens...
And this is the way to go for Maduro. They need to nationalize as much as possible from the economy. This way they would be less exposed to that exchange rate mechanism.
44 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-05-22
You're not shit next to me. My genes are just light years superior to yours and I don't even need to look at you.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 AgentGotse 2018-05-22
Some highlights:
Janitors and CEOs are equally smart.
Is nationalisation actually helping Venezuela? Yes, because Marx said some shit some time ago.
1 Fletch71011 2018-05-22
Jesus Christ, imagine not believing Bill Gates isn't a workhorse. His work ethic was insane from pretty much the minute he was born and he's beyond brilliant. It's not like he inherited some giant company, he did all the initial work.
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
Bill gates had access to highly efficient computers (in his university) when no one else did, he was born to a rich highly educated family, etc etc... I'm not saying he didn't work hard, but many people who do don't get shit for it.
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
Yeah he doesn't do shit honestly. He was born into the right situation. You should probably get rid of that double negative though.
1 real_human__bean 2018-05-22
Remember, do not down vote the lolcows, even when they're retarded teenagers 💁🙅💁
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
*preteens
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
Nobody is using Marx's shit to establish socialism you idiot. We know times have changed, hell he didn't even know there would be a middle class. That doesn't make our shit invalid. That's like saying because some dumb guy likes capitalism your argument for it is wrong.
1 Wegwerf540 2018-05-22
Are you calling Marx dumb?
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
More or less
1 Wegwerf540 2018-05-22
Lol
Socialists calling the founding ideologist of their ideals moronic.
What a time to be alive
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
Calling Marx the Father of socialism means you don't know shit about history. There were socialist societies thousands of years beforw him.
1 AgentGotse 2018-05-22
Absolutely disgusting ableism. How can you possibly dismantle capitalism when you are perpetuaning oppression yourself?
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2018-05-22
/u/donkeveryflop it's not about working smarter or harder. It's about how well he can manage his company. It takes intelligence but it also takes leadership skills that are taught to them. You're right about everything else.
1 no_maps_no_plans 2018-05-22
wonder how long it runs until they run out of grain to process.
or it gets looted by the workers.
1 lua_x_ia 2018-05-22
It's easy to run a working machine. But to service that machine when it breaks?
1 noobthrowthisaway 2018-05-22
/u/donkeveryflop
whats ol billy betabux gonna do without the tens of thousands of software engineers he employs?
1 donkeveryflop 2018-05-22
Pretty sure when he dropped out of college he didn’t have thousands of software engineers working for him. That’s the difference between someone that smart and that driven and the average person. It takes a special person to be able to do what he did. There’s a reason why he made it to the top. The average person doesn’t have his intelligence or his work ethic.
1 noobthrowthisaway 2018-05-22
i thought you were saying that his employees need him more than he needs them. they can just go work for any of the other thousands of tech companies in america. he needs to attract/keep talent
as smart as the dude is, it takes more than one super smart guy to run a successful company
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
You don't know anything about collective monopolies do you?
1 noobthrowthisaway 2018-05-22
You gonna explain or...
1 watermark02 2018-05-22
The vast majority of Bill Gates income comes from rent as a product of owning Microsoft, not income provided to him as a reward for his talents. Actually he doesn't do anything but subsist off of rent these days.
1 nanonan 2018-05-22
You're just jealous that every single employee at microsoft is more successful and talented than you.
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
Even the janitor?
1 nanonan 2018-05-22
Especially.
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
That went right over your head didn't it?
1 nanonan 2018-05-22
Ditto.
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2018-05-22
https://www.glassdoor.com/Hourly-Pay/Microsoft-Janitor-Hourly-Pay-E1651_D_KO10,17.htm
Looks well above average for janitorial positions.
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
Yeah
1 crudehumourisdivine 2018-05-22
1 Raven0520 2018-05-22
Try GULAG-Os, now with almost as much nutritional value as the box they come in!
1 Orsonius 2018-05-22
for tankies anything can be socialist if you just want it hard enough
1 Fletch71011 2018-05-22
This is what socialists actually believe.
1 LightUmbra 2018-05-22
Work hard enough and grain will appear.
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
A dirt poor worker in some factory working himself to death will never make more than the corporate boss who sits around with his inherited money doing nothing. Stop lying to yourself. You capitalists are so naive...
1 Fletch71011 2018-05-22
No shit, but that doesn't mean everyone's outcome in life is mostly or even heavily determined by their starting point. It's obviously a mix of both, but in the US, nothing is stopping you but yourself from striking it rich. Capital and investment are pretty easy to come by and the internet makes starting businesses or new ideas easier than ever. I did it at 24 after pitching investors and never looked back.
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
Most people work hard. You have no examples or logical patterns or evidence to say anything. You are just repeating your thesis. You obviously are a victim of the survivor bias too.
1 subpoutine 2018-05-22
Lol the absolute irony of a socialist saying this
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
You are just proving my point lol...
1 subpoutine 2018-05-22
I'm mocking you for demanding evidence while adhering to an ideology whose praxis has shunned all econometric accountability.
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
Still proving my point.. You have no data to suggest that...
1 ucstruct 2018-05-22
This is a cartoonish view of the world. Management in the US is extremely stressful and cutthroat. The difference between a great and average CEO can mean billions for a company.
1 ucstruct 2018-05-22
Corporate managers work incredibly long hours. Its much more stressful and competative than an assembly line worker, and the difference between a good one and bad one means millions/billions more for the company.
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2018-05-22
It's more of the unfortunate fact that while hard work does not mean getting rich, getting rich* and staying so means hard work. Whether it be through legitimate leadership/management or illegitimate bribery and crime. This applies to both capitalist and socialist societies.
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
Fuck off
1 TheLordHighExecu 2018-05-22
The very state of socialist rhetoric
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
No I meant as in you are obviously trolling.
1 TheLordHighExecu 2018-05-22
I'm not even the same guy big brain
1 SuperObviousShill 2018-05-22
Capitalists are naive? And yet communists don't believe the gulag archipelago
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
Nobody likes gulags. Nobody likes stalin. Stalin ruined the ussr. The gulags were a product of dictatorship. And no, communism being instable was not the reason a dictator like Stalin could come into power. It was because the government and by extention country was attacked politically on all sides.
1 SuperObviousShill 2018-05-22
The modern socialist movement speaks fairly highly of him, and denounces all criticism of him as counter-revolutionary.
And filled entirely with people who were accused of crimes against communism.
No, a ruler like Stalin could come into power because Lenin had already created repressive mechanisms Stalin could make use.
Funny how every attempt at communism seems to blame its inevitable failure on "attacks from outside forces" which usually amounts to "Uh yeah... we won't accept your currency because your price controls don't reflect its true value, so no goods for you"
But I'm sure this was all sufficient reason for Stalin to play musical chairs with murderous henchmen who he then had murdered and replaced with other murderers. And I don't know about you, but when someone criticizes capitalism, I rape and murder young women then bury them in my front yard, Beria style.
1 TheLordHighExecu 2018-05-22
Yeah, Russia sure was attacked on all sides by their dozen imperial puppets and buffer states
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
I did not mean physucally. Geography has nothing to do with this. Fuck off
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
I didn't mean attacked physically doofus.
1 ironicshitpostr 2018-05-22
Wrong, I love gulags, and as a (((radical centrism))) I believe all extremists should be tossed into one by helicopter.
1 Selfawarenesshere 2018-05-22
Didn't you here no one every falls down ever. No one in the history of the universe has had a good start in life but found themselves unable to succeed in any measurable way. nope once you have money, you're always money. And as we all know celebrities never lose battles to depression in spite of the support around them....nope, never happens...
/u/ OmnipotentEntity
(I hope you can hear my eyeballs rolling round their sockets as you read this)
1 JoeFalchetto 2018-05-22
Sweet baby Milton Friedman.
1 sooth_ 2018-05-22
they'll poof the inflation away
1 westofthetracks 2018-05-22
dayyym capitalism RESIGNED 😂😂😂😂
1 Ultrashitposter 2018-05-22
Now if only they had some food to put into it
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
Wow, you added tons to this conversation.
1 Ultrashitposter 2018-05-22
thanks
1 Spinnis 2018-05-22
Shut the up
1 AsianKKKAbortsGuns 2018-05-22
Jesus fucking Christ.
They don’t even understand what the core problem is.
1 sooth_ 2018-05-22
hey there's no toilet paper in stores, but at least there are people who can affort some cereal for a hyperinflated price!
1 agenderphobe 2018-05-22
I thought that Venezuela wasn't "real socialism", why would /r/socialism care about a state capitalist country?