This was already posted.

u/danidv

loli, which I remind is a body type so it has absolutely no relation to age

🤔🤔🤔

A body type that only children have.

Achallt she's 900 years.old

You've obviously never seen Marina Nagasawa. Many different jav stars have that body type and they are adult women, stop spreading misinformation.

Jesus Christ pedo neckbeards have no shame.

22 years old woman Pedo

Pick one.

I didn't call you a pedo for liking her. I called you a pedo because you're running around the internet pretending loli isn't modeled after children. Deep down you know the truth, even if you don't want to admit it to yourself.

So you're telling me that if you drew this girl as a cartoon in a sexual situation that wouldn't be lolicon?

And if it isn't, how would you distinguish it from such if she has the body you say only a child can have when she is an adult?

When reduced to a cartoon a random character does NOT have an age. There is no way at first glance that anyone would know that a cartoon of Marina Nagasawa was in fact of her if they did not know her and know her age, but it is in fact still in their eyes lolicons while also being art of an adult. But you see I like her and I like that she is someone my age I can relate to as a human being while simultaneously having a body I find attractive, if she were a child she would be unrelatable.

Pedos like children because they have brains that haven't developed yet and can be taken advantage of, they are predators who who seek power over those who have none. Lolicons like an image aesthetic, that's why they seek out cartoons and anime and in general tell pedos to fuck off w/ some cement shoes.

Most loli art has a very colorful and bright appeal, the are always happy, smiling, baiing some sort of cake or cookie and falling asleep under the heated table. It's a glossy world of cat ears and healing headpats in a world declining birth rates, mental illness, and rampent social issues. It's no wonder that a lot of nerds are addicted to the idilic world of anime in general.

I like women who have a certain body type and I like seeing that replicated in cartoons. With the stories I read the lolis can be sexualized, they can make their own concious choices they are autonomous beings. A child is not a loli, a child can NOT be a sexual being or make their own overreaching choices about life or sex and for people to compare the two or suggest otherwise is a real danger, once again comparing fiction to reality is the real slippery slope.

Now this IS discounting the small part of the loli comminty who read stories about lolis who cannot consent, or violence t stories about lolis, but these people are really far and few between and if it's anything to go off of, people's reaction to Geiger Counter means that most loli doujinshi readers and anime watchers really despise that sort of content. They seek a more pure and healing experience that really does mimic the standard sort of escapism we see from really any sort of nerd group when dissected enough.

All I'm saying is you don't have to BE young to have a very youthful body in appearance, And the phenomenon can be seen on many different popular porn websites to back up my claim. If you drew any of the girls in those xxxtrasmall or "tiny teen" porn videos as exaggerated anime girls they'd all be considered lolis. "Loli" is NOT tied to age. It's tied to aesthetic. And I'm fine being a teen lover, until they raise the age of consent from 18 to something else and I'm grizzled and my old and my tits are swanging I'm going to keep fighting the good porno fight.

Violet Evergarden is 14. Wtf Japan.

Now i understand why people are mad she’s in Battlefield 5

I just searched two hentai that have obvious lolis and they were still there, so I think just the tag got removed. Half of the "loli" tag on HentaiHaven was 17.5 year olds with DD tits anyway so it's no loss to remove it as a tag.

Reminder that if you spend more than 15 minutes whacking it a day, you're a sick freak.

It takes me 20mons to come

Acceptable

NOOOOOOOOOO oh wait I'm not horribly addicted to scary porn.

I want to see a court case where someone tries the 667 year old vampire excuse. Either it gets overturned or the idiot goes to jail; both scenarios are good for dramacoin.

Noone normal would use this argument. If someone actually is atracted to little girls, would it not be better if he just fapped to drawings? It is not like he will rape children just like wiolent videogames do not make you violent.