Such a dumb fucking idea though... I mean Reddit is basically the same concept as Pravda (such a CLEVER and IRONIC name XD) isn't it? Elon's website is going to be visited by (presumably) everyday, normal people with unchecked biases, not academic, neutral professionals. Just look at how Reddit discussions turn out: threads are brigaded by ideological opponents, comments are downvoted not because they're uninformative, but because that person disagrees, etc.. mob rule can eat my unwiped ass
They don't lie, the just make a biased selection of facts to confirm/rebuke: if a fact truthfully puts liberals in bad light or conservatives in good light, it's often deemed "not noteworthy enough". Meanwhile really small and insignificant thingies in the opposite direction, like "Obama said something nice to veterans" or "Bush made a blunder" make it.
Similarly, a story that is partially true will often get a partial truthfulness credit if it's not along the lines ("legendary"), but full credit ("true") if it's the desired narrative, the respective articles either underlining the discrepancies as "making it too far from truth" or dismissing as "not significant enough to influence the result" according to personal opinions of the authors.
Personally, I wonder how often they take a story that exists in several mutations and pick the least faithful retelling to be able to slap "false" on it.
The snopes article on Samantha Bee being in favor of keeping her upper-westside public school free of filthy minority poors is incredibly slanted.
It calls the claim false, but when you read the article they source that's exactly what they're saying, they're just using the same coded language anti-busing advocates used.
And they will pick any small inaccuracy to slap a big red "FALSE" on anything not along the party lines. Actually, since we don't know how the original submissions look like, it's possible the inaccuracies aren't accidental.
Yeah, as OP's overblown example says, this is their modus operandi: the stories contain bigger or smaller inaccuracies. The decision whether given inaccuracy makes the story 'false' or 'partially true' is entirely political and discrepancies over which the mark 'false' is assigned are sometimes ridiculous. "Did Trump predict Brexit 3 days before it happened?" False! (He predicted it a month before it happened!)
no, im saying snopes business model is lying by strawman
nobody ever accused hillary of pouring corrosive acid on anything, they accused her of deleting files
the page admits she deletes files, but only after the big FALSE rating and completely misrepresenting the context
people dumb enough to trust snopes to make a judgement for them often dont read further than they need to for confirmation bias to kick in, and propaganda successful
its really really low level though and kind of a running joke
In this case the strawman was the direct Trump quote about expensive acid washing and you are mad they didn't apply the special daddy defense squad de-retardation procedure to his confused ramblings before discussing it.
you can try and make all the memes you like, but because theyre not based on real easy to absorb facts and rather your assertions they dont stick in regular peoples minds
the type of person that reads snopes sees trump make a statement, panics, and then runs to snopes so they can have a cat lady tell them "nuh uh trump lied!"
Not to break the sacred state of radical centrism, but I've been convinced Politifact is bullshit. I've seen the exact same statement said by two different people (one good, and one bad) and given wildly different ratings.
I mean we a know this which is why this is gonna be fucking hilarious. Tbf tho Musky is just bad cause of all the bad press Tesla is getting because autopilot killing people apparently isn't his fault.
You often see his tweets on /r/quityourbullshit where journalists just straight up lie or repeat completely unfounded narrative or some other kind of ineptitude. Journalists of all stripes on all tiers are a fucking joke.
I told an Elon fanboy the other day that I’m skeptical of Pravda and that it doesn’t absolve us of critically processing articles we come across even if Pravda somehow works. They responded saying there’s nothing wrong with Elon wanting poll-based press and that I should rest assured. And that there’s no point in encouraging critical reading because most people don’t do it.
Read the details faggot. He plans on addressing bot accts, brigades, etc. I’m glad someone is taking on the msm, Elon I hardly a right wing figure, but he sees how much the media lies to create narratives. Anyone that thinks the msm is unbiased and a good read is a complete ass wagon dolt.
The problem is the people, he is going to give people the right to vote on that, T_D retarded faggots are going to suck Fox News off, while SJW's are going to do the same with CNN.
The details are non existent, this idea is retarded
Nah read the details and quit being an apathetic fgt. He’s trying to do something rather than sit around and complain like the rest of us. You don’t think he realizes the potential flaws? Dudes pretty sharp iirc
Can’t fail any worse than snopes, poltifact, etc.. I implore him to do it right, I’m sure there were nay saying cunts like you saying the same shit about p2p Wikipedia before it launched. Dudes way smarter than you or me
He can buy any team money can buy to come up with viable methods to do so. Have you seen his OpenAI team's Dota2 A.I. experience? It quite literally changed the game forever. Link
As far as I know Dota2 was the only mainstream game they tackled that really got attention. They do have a tool for solving old school games though. Link
I always publicly declare my intention to invest in deeply flawed business plans whenever anyone calls my Hyperloop idea stupid. That's how I show them that I'm an alpha businessman!
Lib journalists should probably just do what the republicans accuse them of. Just make up a whole bunch of shit throwing Rs under the bus. Who gives a fuck.
I mean Reddit is basically the same concept as Pravda (such a CLEVER and IRONIC name XD) isn't it?
Yup, and does anyone else remember the stage Reddit went through where it was absolutely, totally, completely positive that sites like RT were totally good places to get news from?
yes, lets assume their financial situation has reversed entirely, instead of considering that maybe its not worth writing the same article over and over years in a row to confirm the same thing
much like the news doesnt report things that have been the same for 5 years repeatedly (maybe american news)
I mean Reddit is basically the same concept as Pravda (such a CLEVER and IRONIC name XD) isn't it?
Is this some sort of mass social media LARPing with daddy Musk as the GM? He tweeted about some day dreaming idea and everyone is jumping down his throat for it like it's reality. Is it going to be like reddit? Who the fuck knows? Maybe we should wait until he makes something before writing papers on why it doesn't work.
It depends what it looks like. If it was like a prediction market that tracked reporters predictions or something like that, maybe it could be a good thing?
Elon, like the vast majority of people, has no clue what he's talking about when he starts talking about areas not in his wheelhouse. This rant against journos is just his way of taking out frustration getting called out for being an anti union boy.
Im a big Munsk fanboy but the news website is such a terrible idea. Its gonna get swamped with people with personal vendettas rather than any real factual issues.
Of course the SRDines here think this is true terrible idea. Getting their buddies in the news to flat-out lie abour those who disagree with them is SOP for the sjw.
actual newspapers are owned by the exact same people as cable news and every other form of american news media, what kind of diverse opinions do you think exist in there
You're not listening. Cable news is filled with hour after hour of talking heads. News papers do have opinion sections, but you are getting much more actual reporting. Reporting on facts. Reporting on what actually happened. Cable news is filled with analysis of those facts, which will be tilted and twisted in any which direction.
You make the mistake of overestimating people in the media. They're fucking retarded. I work at a newspaper and the level of stupidly and incompetence would astound you.
WSJ does excellent reporting, as does NYT and the Boston Globe basically started the whole priests fucking kids scandal.
But let's be real here, as MDEfugee you only want to see stories about muh white genocide and consider any outlet that doesn't report on your delusions to be fake and owned by "the exact same (((people))) who own all the media".
That was bad, but they have done really good reports on quite a few subjects such as social security disability fraud - including finding a judge where people seeking benefits had a 100% win rate -, 1MDB scandal was broken by them, and companies illegally backdating stock options come to mind.
You can report on facts alone and still be biased by picking which facts to report on. It's staggering to me how so many people think that just because an article is 100% filled with true and cold facts, that it must be 100% unbiased.
literally every american outlet is propaganda lol, anyone taking them seriously at all is a rube
just google any mention of white supremacy or white nationalism since 2016, considering its not a real thing that exists in any real meaningful capacity
just google any mention of white supremacy or white nationalism since 2016, considering its not a real thing that exists in any real meaningful capacity
I dunno dude, the fact that they are organized enough to stage rallies and have their members in the office of the executive branch seems like a pretty meaningful capacity to me.
consider who exactly was in power at this time, which media organisations side with them politically, and what possible reasoning there is for disseminating propaganda to americans domestically
and then have a look at whats in the news
dont worry though theyre definitely not lying to you, thatd be dishonest
I dunno dude, the fact that they are organized enough to stage rallies
citation needed, i dont believe tiki torch parades filled with fbi members or random car crashes count tbh
Wow, thats interesting. Could you tell me what about this article is fabricated?
hard to tell because of the paywall, but from what i can tell its just a filler article about a sports team
would it be better if i said any actual news reporting they do is biased to the point of being useless, because of their association with the cia?
because i feel like youre just looking for wording to pick at
Its kind of funny that youve suddenly stopped talking about white nationalists
isnt "white nationalism" just what you guys call white supremacy nowadays? because being white and nationalist isnt inherently a bad thing, or very descriptive
Oh, so its a conspiracy because reasons. I see.
no its a conspiracy because thats pretty much all the fbi does nowadays apart from talking shit about trump and misappropriating funds
creating and funding honeypots to catch irrelevant groups of rednecks after encouraging them
for instance did you know the kkk is pretty much run by the fbi now?
would it be better if i said any actual news reporting they do is biased to the point of being useless
Perhaps you could provide an example of this? Since apparently you are so familiar with WaPo's reporting that you don't even know how to defeat their paywall Ive got to say, Im kind of skeptical if you actually read any of their reporting and instead it seems like you're just mindlessly parroting conspiracy theories.
isnt "white nationalism" just what you guys call white supremacy nowadays?
No. Seriously, how could you rant about this stuff without knowing the distinction?
no its a conspiracy because thats pretty much all the fbi does nowadays apart from talking shit about trump and misappropriating funds
omg whose sockpuppet are you because lol My money is on AA.
Perhaps you could provide an example of this? Since apparently you are so familiar with WaPo's reporting that you don't even know how to defeat their paywall
i dont read propaganda
Im kind of skeptical if you actually read any of their reporting and instead it seems like you're just mindlessly parroting conspiracy theories.
lol dont you think russia hacked an election still
No. Seriously, how could you rant about this stuff without knowing the distinction?
im asking you to make a point though, i aready know full well white nationalism doesnt actually mean anything when you say it
omg whose sockpuppet are you because lol My money is on AA.
thats a cool way to back out of a discussion without admitting youre wildly outclassed
I don't think anyone old enough to have lived through that shit has forgotten Judith Miller and her ilk. Trying to claim that she was a government propagandist put in place by the State Dept and/or CIA however is a bit freaking much.
It's absolute morons like you that are destroying the public's ability to have any kind of meaningful discussions about anything important with your baseless fear mongering. Every american media outlet is a lying propaganda outfit? really? Judgeing by your "fbi agent" comment there I bet you have no problem believing whatever retarded youtube documentary shows up in your recommended feed. You are no different than anyone else, buck-o: A lost sheep drowning in misinformation and spin. At least whn CNN fucks me they give me a reach around.
The worst part about absolute thickies like you is that you're so dumb you think you have the whole world figured out, so you can never learn. You read about the smith mundt repeal and now, since you are so clever, you have figured out the entirety of the american media landscape, and anything they write, anything challenging that comes out of the whole fucking institution and be ignored and dismissed. Haven't you heard of Smith mundt dawg? Everything is a lie.
Fuck you, moron. PM me your address so I can fly to your house and beat you up.
It's absolute morons like you that are destroying the public's ability to have any kind of meaningful discussions about anything important with your baseless fear mongering.
fucking lol the public doesnt have any meaningful discussion specifically because its stifled by propaganda disseminated by the government
omg muh russia and stormy daniels amirite
Judgeing by your "fbi agent" comment there I bet you have no problem believing whatever retarded youtube documentary shows up in your recommended feed.
hilarious, do you not believe honeypots exist or something
At least whn CNN fucks me they give me a reach around.
lol no
The worst part about absolute thickies like you is that you're so dumb you think you have the whole world figured out, so you can never learn.
weird how ive been right about everything then huh, must be a fluke
You read about the smith mundt repeal and now, since you are so clever, you have figured out the entirety of the american media landscape, and anything they write, anything challenging that comes out of the whole fucking institution and be ignored and dismissed. Haven't you heard of Smith mundt dawg? Everything is a lie.
so, confirmed youd never heard of it and were unaware obama made it law that its cool to lie to you lol
anything challenging that comes out of the whole fucking institution and be ignored and dismissed.
lol no the entire institution itself can be ignored
if you read american media youre automatically below the threshold of intelligence needed to have a real conversation
Fuck you, moron. PM me your address so I can fly to your house and beat you up.
lol nobody pro american media can ever beat anyone up who are you fooling
Jesus christ. the memes have infected your brain, dude. I'm leaving for work right now but could you do me a favor and type this reply again, but this time write it like a fucking human and not an AI trained on 4chan comments, ok? I'll catch up with you in a few.
So some rando with the name Stan Lee got his account verified by twitter as the comic book guy, and nobody doubts it until he says something the mob disagrees with? Hmmmmmm not buying it
I feel bad for this elderly-ass man who recently got his twitter set up and has jumped smack-dab into the middle of an obnoxious screeching ideological shitshow.
Does anyone else feel Christmassy - looking at that sweet old man and his sweater? Cozy up near the fire in a nice comfy chair, read the first chapter of Mein Kampf and just finger yourself raw. Lovely season.
When trump says fake news he is against free speech and a lair, when Musk say it its for humanity good. We are not forgotten the backlash against TopGear and the lawsuit Musk lost twice over there review. He is no different than a dictator using his army to silence people, instead of military he use lawyers.
Pravda is a Russian broadsheet newspaper, formerly the official newspaper of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, when it was one of the most influential papers in the country with a circulation of 11 million.
It was a fucking joke to make a point lmao he was gonna name it after a Soviet ministry that used to edit newspapers in Russia so they don't say anything too risky lol
259 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-05-27
Gay porn is a genre that cuts across all demographics and the stigma that you have to be gay to enjoy it needs to come to an end right now.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2018-05-27
First article for Pravda right here.
1 Stuntman119 2018-05-27
((("Stan Lee")))
1 BobTehCat 2018-05-27
((([[[{{{<<<"""Stan Lee""">>>}}}]]])))
1 COINTELPROxShareBlue 2018-05-27
Such a dumb fucking idea though... I mean Reddit is basically the same concept as Pravda (such a CLEVER and IRONIC name XD) isn't it? Elon's website is going to be visited by (presumably) everyday, normal people with unchecked biases, not academic, neutral professionals. Just look at how Reddit discussions turn out: threads are brigaded by ideological opponents, comments are downvoted not because they're uninformative, but because that person disagrees, etc.. mob rule can eat my unwiped ass
1 newcomer_ts 2018-05-27
Found (((one))).
And that’s why Reddit is golden...
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-05-27
This is what fentanyl does to you.
1 JebusChrist69 2018-05-27
Reddit generally tends to be young and inexperienced compared to the general public.
1 dildosaurusrex_ 2018-05-27
And the users of Pravda are going to be... what?
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-05-27
The sane, but but blockchain.
1 MegaSeedsInYourBum 2018-05-27
So instead of imaginary internet points you get imaginary money. I can't see anyway that could turn out badly.
1 skivian 2018-05-27
And much like that scam that u/gallowboob is whoring himself out for, literally no one but the employees will ever see any money.
1 SpaceDog777 2018-05-27
Comment karma as well?
1 Captain-Turtle 2018-05-27
pravda will probably be filled with annoying kids who wank off elon musk
1 Karlore473 2018-05-27
yeah compared to um, media outlets aimed at older people like cnn and foxnews.
1 ErictheRedding 2018-05-27
...yeah, that’s what he’s saying.
1 scatmunchies 2018-05-27
Your mom tends to be old, nasty and skankulous compared to the general public.
1 pizzashill 2018-05-27
Seriously disagree about the ideological part. Like over 50% of the country thinks reality is rigged against them.
The only people that care enough to go rate news stories are old conservatives.
People that I'm amazed can even tie their own shoes.
1 JebusChrist69 2018-05-27
As if the intelligentsia is supposed to be less ideological. Educated people are the most propagandized group of people, almost by definition.
1 pizzashill 2018-05-27
Factually incorrect. That's just something the uneducated say because they have an inferiority complex.
It's why conservatives spend so much time attacking education.
1 JebusChrist69 2018-05-27
I have a degree in poly sci from a top public school, am overly obsessed with politics, and your words scream "ignorant" to me.
1 pizzashill 2018-05-27
Then you're an example of a stupid person that happens to be educated.
The idea that education doesn't help resist propaganda is outright absurd.
There's a reason, for example, one of the first things an authoritarian does, after attacking the media, is try to co-opt the education system.
1 JebusChrist69 2018-05-27
Or, maybe, you're a young, inexperienced person who has very little clue about how the world works.
1 pizzashill 2018-05-27
No. You're like one of those people that claims "street smarts" is equal to education.
Like you're basically saying 2+2=5 right now. In no universe are the more educated more vulnerable to stuff like this, it makes no rational sense.
1 Plexipus 2018-05-27
Equating "salt of the earth common sense" with actual higher education is one of the main reasons the US is the giant shitshow it is
1 TheFallenHero 2018-05-27
Literally multiple sites already exist to do this, Snopes, Fullfact, etc
1 ArttuH5N1 2018-05-27
But Musk can't control the truth there
1 SonyXboxNintendo11 2018-05-27
"Truth".
1 ArttuH5N1 2018-05-27
Well, yeah, that was the implication
1 ahbslldud 2018-05-27
They check actual facts, but do they allow regular flaming morons to vote on what's actually true? Checkmate, atheists.
1 73696D756C6174696F6E 2018-05-27
Yes, they're called reporters. Look at this Politifact article.
1 ahbslldud 2018-05-27
DADDY DEFENSE FORCE ASSEMBLE 😤😤😤😤😤
1 73696D756C6174696F6E 2018-05-27
Can I be the red one?
1 oss_spy 2018-05-27
You aren't allowed to be a republican here. Radical centrism means not being republican.
1 Bisoromi 2018-05-27
You picked THAT out of any other example you could have given to defend your pappy? Come on man try again you can do better if you really try.
1 modsarethebest 2018-05-27
it's hilarious you think politifact is engaged in fact-checking
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
imagine even remotely trusting any of those companies
1 vjaY619 2018-05-27
Preach. Seeing brainless liberals cite politifact articles as absolute truth hurts my almonds. It's like the ministry of truth for them.
1 Imgur_Lurker 2018-05-27
https://i.redd.it/af2wlx3w5g011.png
1 HivemindBuster 2018-05-27
People who think snopes is bad are flat earthers or similar brainlets/lunatics.
1 UniversityDaniel 2018-05-27
Snopes occasionally misrepresents the truth to favor their political opinions
1 HivemindBuster 2018-05-27
Do they though?
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-05-27
Better check Snopes to be sure
1 sharfpang 2018-05-27
They don't lie, the just make a biased selection of facts to confirm/rebuke: if a fact truthfully puts liberals in bad light or conservatives in good light, it's often deemed "not noteworthy enough". Meanwhile really small and insignificant thingies in the opposite direction, like "Obama said something nice to veterans" or "Bush made a blunder" make it.
Similarly, a story that is partially true will often get a partial truthfulness credit if it's not along the lines ("legendary"), but full credit ("true") if it's the desired narrative, the respective articles either underlining the discrepancies as "making it too far from truth" or dismissing as "not significant enough to influence the result" according to personal opinions of the authors.
Personally, I wonder how often they take a story that exists in several mutations and pick the least faithful retelling to be able to slap "false" on it.
1 ArttuH5N1 2018-05-27
Can you give examples?
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
They said Daddy lies! Bias! Bias!
1 Manifest 2018-05-27
The snopes article on Samantha Bee being in favor of keeping her upper-westside public school free of filthy minority poors is incredibly slanted. It calls the claim false, but when you read the article they source that's exactly what they're saying, they're just using the same coded language anti-busing advocates used.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
snopes is literally just a paid politics poster and his wife with trump derangement syndrome
OMG TRUMP SAID HILLARY ACID WASHED HER SERVER
PANTS ON FIRE RATING HILLARY DID NOT IN FACT USE CORROSIVE ACID TO WIPE HER SERVER SHE USED A SOFTWARE
LIES LIES LIES TRUMPS A LIAR
and then you nod and agree like "hmm what an introspective thought piece"
1 HivemindBuster 2018-05-27
They have thousands and thousands of articles substantially debunking insane bullshit that people like you eat up.
1 sharfpang 2018-05-27
And they will pick any small inaccuracy to slap a big red "FALSE" on anything not along the party lines. Actually, since we don't know how the original submissions look like, it's possible the inaccuracies aren't accidental.
Yeah, as OP's overblown example says, this is their modus operandi: the stories contain bigger or smaller inaccuracies. The decision whether given inaccuracy makes the story 'false' or 'partially true' is entirely political and discrepancies over which the mark 'false' is assigned are sometimes ridiculous. "Did Trump predict Brexit 3 days before it happened?" False! (He predicted it a month before it happened!)
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
lol nothing theyve done is substantial, its literally all opinion and hearsay and misinterpreting peoples words deliberately
1 HivemindBuster 2018-05-27
You have no idea what you're talking about.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
snopes is considered a joke by most of the internet, the only people that take it seriously are the types that post on politics and voted hillary
specifically because its funded by the same people
1 HivemindBuster 2018-05-27
No it isn't, it's only considered a joke by far right chantards because it consistently debunks their bullshit.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
lol this is what progressive reddit users actually believe
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-05-27
So, if I follow you here, because Trump says insanely retarded things you think Snopes is bad?
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
is that how you interpret that article is it lol
this is why snopes exists, because dudes like you also exist
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-05-27
"Daddy was only pretending to be retarded!"
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
no, im saying snopes business model is lying by strawman
nobody ever accused hillary of pouring corrosive acid on anything, they accused her of deleting files
the page admits she deletes files, but only after the big FALSE rating and completely misrepresenting the context
people dumb enough to trust snopes to make a judgement for them often dont read further than they need to for confirmation bias to kick in, and propaganda successful
its really really low level though and kind of a running joke
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-05-27
In this case the strawman was the direct Trump quote about expensive acid washing and you are mad they didn't apply the special daddy defense squad de-retardation procedure to his confused ramblings before discussing it.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
imagine seriously trying to claim trump meant literal acid after weeks of talking about deleting files
this is why people say youre dishonest
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-05-27
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
you can try and make all the memes you like, but because theyre not based on real easy to absorb facts and rather your assertions they dont stick in regular peoples minds
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-05-27
👌🏿😂😂😂😂
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
So, even in your overblown example, they tell the truth while holding Trump accountable for Inna curate statements? Lmao.
Monsters!
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
youre not really aware of how propaganda works are you
how many people do you think read past a headline
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
People who check Snopes in the first place do so specifically because they aren't looking for clickbait, you gigantic mong.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
no theyre looking for affirmation
the type of person that reads snopes sees trump make a statement, panics, and then runs to snopes so they can have a cat lady tell them "nuh uh trump lied!"
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
You have to be spectacularly retarded to think Snopes is in the same camp as American cable new channels. Lmfao.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
nah its literally worse, sometimes cable news is wrong by accident
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2018-05-27
Lollllllll
1 modsarethebest 2018-05-27
that's what makes it so hilarious
you actually drink the koolaid
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
Snopes says drinking bleach is bad for you. Maybe you should disregard their warning because, you know, Snopes.
1 modsarethebest 2018-05-27
why do you suck at logic so bad
I say A=>B
you act as if I said B=>A
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
Why are you seriousposting in /r/Drama?
If you want to take anything seriously, maybe it should be the bleach option.
1 modsarethebest 2018-05-27
why are you seriousposting in /r/drama?
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
WhY aRe YoU sErIoUsPoStInG iN /r/DrAmA?
Are you legitimately retarded, or just German?
1 Fletch71011 2018-05-27
Snopes is generally believed to have a small liberal bias which is fairly apparent in some of its political fact checking.
That's why you use multiple sites and sources. Every site is biased in some way.
1 gutterdice 2018-05-27
snopes was ok when it stuck to urban legends.
1 ErictheRedding 2018-05-27
Imagine remotely believing in anything.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
i have a strong belief that trump derangement syndrome should be roundly mocked at any given opportunity
1 ErictheRedding 2018-05-27
Defined by what you don’t believe. Lame.
1 shallowm 2018-05-27
tds sufferers do literally nothing to this sub and by extension you, theyve never even mentioned it lol
the feelings toward them are 100% on you
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
tds sufferers post here the most dude
anyone that complains about trump or elon musk or peterson or chans or mde is pretty much the same thing, its all just faggotry
it tells me people arent experienced at the internet
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-05-27
Not to break the sacred state of radical centrism, but I've been convinced Politifact is bullshit. I've seen the exact same statement said by two different people (one good, and one bad) and given wildly different ratings.
1 WistopherWalken 2018-05-27
I mean we a know this which is why this is gonna be fucking hilarious. Tbf tho Musky is just bad cause of all the bad press Tesla is getting because autopilot killing people apparently isn't his fault.
1 oss_spy 2018-05-27
He's an idiot. Anyone who seriously believes in the Hyperloop is also an idiot.
1 zenicaone 2018-05-27
I will believe in hyperloop too, when I get few billions from government.
until that happens ....
LOLOLOLOL HYPERLOOP OMG WHAT KIND OF IDIOT BELIEVES IN HYPERLOOP.
1 HBlight 2018-05-27
You often see his tweets on /r/quityourbullshit where journalists just straight up lie or repeat completely unfounded narrative or some other kind of ineptitude. Journalists of all stripes on all tiers are a fucking joke.
1 Narsil098 2018-05-27
And this tweets are almost always "no u".
1 HBlight 2018-05-27
That is often enough for calling someone out on their bullshit when their bullshit is about you.
1 gyrotur 2018-05-27
I dont trust any of those type of websites, fuck even Wikipedia makes me uncomfortable.
1 AbnormalAbno 2018-05-27
But you're gonna trust daddy elon's site?
1 some_shitty_person 2018-05-27
I told an Elon fanboy the other day that I’m skeptical of Pravda and that it doesn’t absolve us of critically processing articles we come across even if Pravda somehow works. They responded saying there’s nothing wrong with Elon wanting poll-based press and that I should rest assured. And that there’s no point in encouraging critical reading because most people don’t do it.
Still rustles my jimmies /angryrant
1 soylent_absinthe 2018-05-27
It should. Check out /r/WikiInAction and you'll realize that Jimmy's "Free Encyclopedia" is actually just a gigantic political circlejerk.
Maybe all those fucking professors that wouldn't accept any wiki citations were on to something...
1 Dropperneck 2018-05-27
Read the details faggot. He plans on addressing bot accts, brigades, etc. I’m glad someone is taking on the msm, Elon I hardly a right wing figure, but he sees how much the media lies to create narratives. Anyone that thinks the msm is unbiased and a good read is a complete ass wagon dolt.
1 AbnormalAbno 2018-05-27
How? By banning bots?
The problem is the people, he is going to give people the right to vote on that, T_D retarded faggots are going to suck Fox News off, while SJW's are going to do the same with CNN.
The details are non existent, this idea is retarded
1 Dropperneck 2018-05-27
Nah read the details and quit being an apathetic fgt. He’s trying to do something rather than sit around and complain like the rest of us. You don’t think he realizes the potential flaws? Dudes pretty sharp iirc
1 AbnormalAbno 2018-05-27
Potential flaws? The whole thing is fucking flawed in it's entirety.
That's why I want it to go through, it's going to be such a mess it's going to backfire to the point of being hilarious.
Keep on funding rockets and kill-cars elon, politics is not your thing.
1 Dropperneck 2018-05-27
Can’t fail any worse than snopes, poltifact, etc.. I implore him to do it right, I’m sure there were nay saying cunts like you saying the same shit about p2p Wikipedia before it launched. Dudes way smarter than you or me
1 grungebot5000 2018-05-27
oof
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
Lmao. The guy bitches about Snopes. I don't imagine "fact" is in his vocabulary.
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2018-05-27
Snopes isn't unbiased...
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
Republicans never called Snopes biased when their leadership relied on fact as a basis for their policy, lol.
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2018-05-27
? Ok
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
So you're conceding the point that Republicans think Snopes is biased because nothing they say is factual? 🤔 🤔 🤔
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2018-05-27
? No
1 tfdidido 2018-05-27
worst thing that happens is that it doesnt work
but honestly something should be tried
spanish media is a fucking joke too dude, and i think it wasnt as bad in the past thag it is nowadays
1 AbnormalAbno 2018-05-27
Something should be tried? Yes.
Not this though, at least give it some thought lol
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
That's never stopped Elon "Hyperloop" Musk before!
1 RedPillDessert 2018-05-27
Oy.
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
Someone call the Department of Redundancy Department.
1 RedPillDessert 2018-05-27
Watching you guys meme against milliondollarextreme would be interesting haha.
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
I'm trying to cut down on the amount of time I spend mocking people with the wrong number of chromosomes, tho.
1 RedPillDessert 2018-05-27
Wait we haven't started yet!
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
MDE OUT OUT OUT 👉 👉 👉
/u/Ed_ButteredToast, take it from here.
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
Yeah since thats totally a trivial and easy thing to do.
1 Dropperneck 2018-05-27
And bc something isn’t easy then it shouldn’t be tried. #Fucking millenials
1 vjaY619 2018-05-27
"The science is settled dude. Don't question it!!"
1 Dropperneck 2018-05-27
^ this
1 vjaY619 2018-05-27
He can buy any team money can buy to come up with viable methods to do so. Have you seen his OpenAI team's Dota2 A.I. experience? It quite literally changed the game forever. Link
1 grungebot5000 2018-05-27
did they do it with any actual games or just MOBAs
1 vjaY619 2018-05-27
As far as I know Dota2 was the only mainstream game they tackled that really got attention. They do have a tool for solving old school games though. Link
Pretty interesting work.
1 SethRichOrDieTryin 2018-05-27
yeah show me an AI that can play telltale games as well as me and then I'll be impressed
1 grungebot5000 2018-05-27
these two sentences don’t seem to have anything to do with each other
1 -Mopsus- 2018-05-27
If you think the website is going to be anything other than partisan bullshit then you're a fucking moron.
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
So does reddit. Lmao.
1 Dropperneck 2018-05-27
Apathy is so cool and not gay at all!
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-27
I always publicly declare my intention to invest in deeply flawed business plans whenever anyone calls my Hyperloop idea stupid. That's how I show them that I'm an alpha businessman!
1 quantum_darkness 2018-05-27
Apathy is cool. fight me.
1 siempreloco31 2018-05-27
Lib journalists should probably just do what the republicans accuse them of. Just make up a whole bunch of shit throwing Rs under the bus. Who gives a fuck.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
lol people that defend american media are hilarious
its trash
1 Minimum_T-Giraff 2018-05-27
but but fox news did something bad.
1 Ace4929 2018-05-27
Two things can be true at the same time. The media absolutely is garbage. But so is Musk’s idea
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
the instant hostile synchronized reaction from the jewiest parts of the media makes me think its a good idea tbh
even a literal rothschild started trying to go at him for it
must be doing something right
1 NormanImmanuel 2018-05-27
That's the point, though. It's so trash it's unfixable.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
if there was a first step itd be some system of holding them accountable though, which is why the outrage is confusing to me
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
Yup, and does anyone else remember the stage Reddit went through where it was absolutely, totally, completely positive that sites like RT were totally good places to get news from?
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
rt is literally no worse than any american outlet
being owned by a billionaire subservient to people in the government is no different than being state owned
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
I found one!
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
can you explain how its worse in a way that isnt directly quoted from an american outlet
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55izx6rbCqg
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
thats just a womans life story and then her saying its funded by the government, we all knew that
so is the bbc and abc
why is a government news service worse than one privately owned by billionaires?
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
Well, for a start in one case the service maintains its editorial independence.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
not really if theyre owned by a billionaire with personal feelings and a stake in what happens, which is always the case
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
Can you provide any examples of billionaire news outlet owners interfering in a new services editorial process?
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
lol what do you think theres gonna be footage of them taking over the news desk and ranting
these people own and run these businesses at a loss specifically so they have a way to manipulate public opinion
same with social media
for example youtube exists to further googles bosses politics, theres no other reason
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
lol certainly couldnt exist to make money for the shareholders? nope nope nope, its a conspiracy!!!!
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
fucking lol dude it runs at a loss how do you think that makes money
nobody else can afford to make the equivalent and lose money as fast as google does with it, thats the point
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
Really? Could you provide a source for this?
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
sure
https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=7868311&page=1
https://www.itproportal.com/2015/02/26/youtube-still-loss-leader-google/
https://www.businessinsider.com.au/youtube-still-doesnt-make-google-any-money-2015-2?r=US&IR=T
https://www.reddit.com/r/youtube/comments/593tgc/reminder_google_runs_youtube_at_a_loss/?st=jhpw6acy&sh=316b6380
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
All of these articles are from 2015. Did you seriously just post a wall of shit you found via Google without bothering to read it or check the date?
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
there are no newer articles, but the fact that theyre demonetizing everyone and cutting back would suggest that perhaps it hasnt gotten better
its not a small amount they were losing then and it was literally their business plan to have exclusive access to user data above money
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
I wonder why!
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
yes, lets assume their financial situation has reversed entirely, instead of considering that maybe its not worth writing the same article over and over years in a row to confirm the same thing
much like the news doesnt report things that have been the same for 5 years repeatedly (maybe american news)
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
Lets not. Big assumptions and leaps in logic are what lead people off into conspiracy theory crazy town. Lets just stick to facts.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
it was sarcasm, because your post was literally assuming that the trend completely stopped and reversed for some reason
1 TheRealRosieOdonnell 2018-05-27
Rupert Murdoch for one.
1 quantum_darkness 2018-05-27
Sure. If you think that when people own your politicians and your media means "independence" then sure.
1 my__name__is 2018-05-27
Is this some sort of mass social media LARPing with daddy Musk as the GM? He tweeted about some day dreaming idea and everyone is jumping down his throat for it like it's reality. Is it going to be like reddit? Who the fuck knows? Maybe we should wait until he makes something before writing papers on why it doesn't work.
1 gcz77 2018-05-27
It depends what it looks like. If it was like a prediction market that tracked reporters predictions or something like that, maybe it could be a good thing?
1 aef823 2018-05-27
It could go 50/50 either.
It'll either end up like ratemyprofessor or rottentomatoes.
1 szatkus 2018-05-27
Can you explain what is Pravda?
Not the word, because it's similar in my language, but what is going on in this drama?
1 Destirigon 2018-05-27
People say the same thing about wikipedia. Most of the time it's still correct.
1 Bisoromi 2018-05-27
Elon, like the vast majority of people, has no clue what he's talking about when he starts talking about areas not in his wheelhouse. This rant against journos is just his way of taking out frustration getting called out for being an anti union boy.
1 nanonan 2018-05-27
Pick one.
1 _pennwolf 2018-05-27
1 gyrotur 2018-05-27
Im a big Munsk fanboy but the news website is such a terrible idea. Its gonna get swamped with people with personal vendettas rather than any real factual issues.
1 TherapyFortheRapy 2018-05-27
So, just like the news itself, then?
Of course the SRDines here think this is true terrible idea. Getting their buddies in the news to flat-out lie abour those who disagree with them is SOP for the sjw.
1 SpotNL 2018-05-27
It says a great deal about yourself when you think of opinion pieces about people when you think about news.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
thats all american news is now
1 cbs5090 2018-05-27
No. No it's not. Turn off cable news for a little while and read actual newspapers. There are tons that focus solely on real reporting.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
actual newspapers are owned by the exact same people as cable news and every other form of american news media, what kind of diverse opinions do you think exist in there
1 cbs5090 2018-05-27
You're not listening. Cable news is filled with hour after hour of talking heads. News papers do have opinion sections, but you are getting much more actual reporting. Reporting on facts. Reporting on what actually happened. Cable news is filled with analysis of those facts, which will be tilted and twisted in any which direction.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
every piece of american media ive ever seen has been equally terrible
can you direct me to something you consider a good example
1 cbs5090 2018-05-27
Every piece? Then you clearly aren't paying attention or are too bias to even consider reason. Have a good one.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
so you cant show me something you consider valid?
1 MargarineIsEvil 2018-05-27
You make the mistake of overestimating people in the media. They're fucking retarded. I work at a newspaper and the level of stupidly and incompetence would astound you.
1 HivemindBuster 2018-05-27
Except infowars, who are the true arbiters of objective news, right?
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
no alex jones is very obvious controlled opposition that for some reason refuses to entertain any negative ideas about zionism or jews
also hes probably just bill hicks
1 HivemindBuster 2018-05-27
Imagine not liking Alex Jones only because he's not nazi enough.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
no i dont like him because his sponsors want to steer conversation
he yells and gets red in the face and talks shit and then slips tiny bits of truth in there to discredit everything by association
1 cheeZetoastee 2018-05-27
WSJ does excellent reporting, as does NYT and the Boston Globe basically started the whole priests fucking kids scandal.
But let's be real here, as MDEfugee you only want to see stories about muh white genocide and consider any outlet that doesn't report on your delusions to be fake and owned by "the exact same (((people))) who own all the media".
1 Li1ght 2018-05-27
Hard to support WSJ after how far they overreached with pewdiepie
1 cheeZetoastee 2018-05-27
That was bad, but they have done really good reports on quite a few subjects such as social security disability fraud - including finding a judge where people seeking benefits had a 100% win rate -, 1MDB scandal was broken by them, and companies illegally backdating stock options come to mind.
1 KittehDragoon 2018-05-27
There's your mistake.
1 modsarethebest 2018-05-27
due to the novelty (by WSJ standards) of youtube celebs, they misfired.
one of those rare cases where the underestimate the reach of their target, and his ability to defend himself and survive the attack.
1 Riencewind 2018-05-27
Who?
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
and the past decade has done nothing but undo any goodwill the informed parts of the public had toward the press in the first place
there is genuine animosity toward reporters
no i just want people to stop being scared of minorities to the point youre just self flagellating
you cant be edgy if youre scared of one particular minority, thats the opposite of edgy
1 cheeZetoastee 2018-05-27
have you considered that the public is just retarded and voicing it via retarded mediums?
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
id argue anyone who paid attention to the mouthpieces of random ass billionaires with agendas wasnt too aware in the first place
1 adnzzzzZ 2018-05-27
You can report on facts alone and still be biased by picking which facts to report on. It's staggering to me how so many people think that just because an article is 100% filled with true and cold facts, that it must be 100% unbiased.
1 Strictlybutters 2018-05-27
Do they still use stone tablets in boogan land?
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
another classic australian joke from a person who knows literally nothing about anywhere but where they were born
1 Strictlybutters 2018-05-27
You’re 100% right I know absolutely nothing about Australia and I’d like to keep it that way
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
doing a good job so far
imagine thinking thats insulting though lol dont you call other people nationalists
1 brianpv 2018-05-27
LOOK IN THE MIRROR.
1 quantum_darkness 2018-05-27
It also says a great deal when you think that news agencies do not craft a narrative by reporting only selected issues and in certain spotlight.
1 SpotNL 2018-05-27
Good thing I didnt say anything like that.
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
Which news outlets do you feel are swamped with people with a personal vendetta rather than actual journalists reporting the news?
1 Snowayne2 2018-05-27
I mean, basically all his ideas are utter shit.
1 agareo 2018-05-27
It'll literally be le 4chin army upvoting white supremacist journalist and downvoting everything else
1 hyledog 2018-05-27
Lol if Andrew Anglin becomes a top Pravda reporter I’ll be ecstatic
1 comebepc 2018-05-27
Good idea
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
as opposed to the media just calling everyone white supremacists and giving them zero recourse
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
Which media outlet do you feel is doing this?
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
literally every american outlet is propaganda lol, anyone taking them seriously at all is a rube
just google any mention of white supremacy or white nationalism since 2016, considering its not a real thing that exists in any real meaningful capacity
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
Im curious, how do you define propaganda?
I dunno dude, the fact that they are organized enough to stage rallies and have their members in the office of the executive branch seems like a pretty meaningful capacity to me.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
lying to the public to push an agenda via media
its perfectly legal in america since the smith mundt repeal in 2012
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith%E2%80%93Mundt_Act
http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/14/u-s-repeals-propaganda-ban-spreads-government-made-news-to-americans/
https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1203&context=nulr
https://www.businessinsider.com.au/us-domestic-propaganda-officially-aired-2013-7
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130715/11210223804/anti-propaganda-ban-repealed-freeing-state-dept-to-direct-its-broadcasting-arm-american-citizens.shtml
consider who exactly was in power at this time, which media organisations side with them politically, and what possible reasoning there is for disseminating propaganda to americans domestically
and then have a look at whats in the news
dont worry though theyre definitely not lying to you, thatd be dishonest
citation needed, i dont believe tiki torch parades filled with fbi members or random car crashes count tbh
who is this in reference to
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
Wow, so can you provide an example of a main stream outlet, lets say.... WaPo, doing this?
Oh wow, I hadnt heard of the FBI being involved at Charlottesville. Could you provide a source?
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
lol almost everything they post is fabricated
washington post is owned by jeff bezos, who also has a 600 million dollar contract with the cia via aws
dont worry though the cia never did any propaganda did they
nearly every "white supremacy" group in the us is a honeypot, its an incredibly unpopular ideology thats been hyped up by the media
you dont think that tiki torch shit was incredibly convenient? lol
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
Wow, thats interesting. Could you tell me what about this article is fabricated?
Its kind of funny that youve suddenly stopped talking about white nationalists, you know, the groups that are currently seeing an upswing in activity.
Oh, so its a conspiracy because reasons. I see.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
hard to tell because of the paywall, but from what i can tell its just a filler article about a sports team
would it be better if i said any actual news reporting they do is biased to the point of being useless, because of their association with the cia?
because i feel like youre just looking for wording to pick at
isnt "white nationalism" just what you guys call white supremacy nowadays? because being white and nationalist isnt inherently a bad thing, or very descriptive
no its a conspiracy because thats pretty much all the fbi does nowadays apart from talking shit about trump and misappropriating funds
creating and funding honeypots to catch irrelevant groups of rednecks after encouraging them
for instance did you know the kkk is pretty much run by the fbi now?
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
Perhaps you could provide an example of this? Since apparently you are so familiar with WaPo's reporting that you don't even know how to defeat their paywall Ive got to say, Im kind of skeptical if you actually read any of their reporting and instead it seems like you're just mindlessly parroting conspiracy theories.
No. Seriously, how could you rant about this stuff without knowing the distinction?
omg whose sockpuppet are you because lol My money is on AA.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
i dont read propaganda
lol dont you think russia hacked an election still
im asking you to make a point though, i aready know full well white nationalism doesnt actually mean anything when you say it
thats a cool way to back out of a discussion without admitting youre wildly outclassed
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
Then how do you know its propaganda?
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
its cia funded and jeff bezos is untrustworthy
would you read breitbart or dismiss it based on who owns it
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
So, youre theory is that WaPo is CIA funded because the CIA contracts with Amazon for web services? Am I understanding this correctly?
I actually have read Brietbart! As an advocate of free thinking I read news from all over the place rather than just repeating what Im told!
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
yes, the cia exists to fuck people over, its evil
nothing theyve ever done is altruistic or genuine or announced properly
they gave money to jeff bezos and then all his articles said what they wanted to say
again, obama made this practice perfectly legal in 2012 on purpose
im sure thats a real sentiment
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
Could you provide an example of one of these articles that you feel is influenced by the CIA?
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2018-05-27
Wow, so the dude you're talkin to is a retard but have you really forgotten the lead up to the Iraq war and let's say... the NYTs already?
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-05-27
I don't think anyone old enough to have lived through that shit has forgotten Judith Miller and her ilk. Trying to claim that she was a government propagandist put in place by the State Dept and/or CIA however is a bit freaking much.
1 modsarethebest 2018-05-27
remember...
1 HivemindBuster 2018-05-27
Why the fuck are you mde morons upvoting this lunatic flat earther tier conspiritard, please leave this sub. reeee
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
the tiki torch march wasnt real, change my mind
1 HivemindBuster 2018-05-27
Is Richard Spencer an fbi plant? Prove it.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
nah hes just an opportunist trying to ride a meme train and something for liberals to hold up and point at
the fact that hes the worst thing that people can come up with kinda indicates to me that white supremacy isnt as prevalent as people think
1 HivemindBuster 2018-05-27
... was the rally organised by FBI plants or not? If the latter, provide any evidence whatsoever for it, or retract your inane claim.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
yeah probably, most other ones are
the leader of the kkk was fbi for a while lol
i mean do you have any evidence whatsoever about it being organised by anyone else?
1 HivemindBuster 2018-05-27
It's called occam's razor, your claim is absurdly far-fetched.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
im sure you apply that idea evenly and without bias right
the kkk has been irrelevant for the better part of half a century
1 PM_ME_UR_SUSPICIONS 2018-05-27
Lol, fucking idiot Australian.
1 jaja10 2018-05-27
le 56% man
1 CheeseburgerNecktie 2018-05-27
What are your thoughts on black people
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
take em or leave em tbh, im in a good enough neighborhood that it doesnt really come up
1 RichEvansSextape 2018-05-27
Because newfag, this isn't fucking SRD and we appreciate crazy people making homegrown drama we can mock them for in our own sandlot.
1 80BAIT08 2018-05-27
> actually using the downvote feature in drama.
1 HivemindBuster 2018-05-27
MDE morons are downvoting anyone who disagrees with this flat earther.
1 PJmath 2018-05-27
It's absolute morons like you that are destroying the public's ability to have any kind of meaningful discussions about anything important with your baseless fear mongering. Every american media outlet is a lying propaganda outfit? really? Judgeing by your "fbi agent" comment there I bet you have no problem believing whatever retarded youtube documentary shows up in your recommended feed. You are no different than anyone else, buck-o: A lost sheep drowning in misinformation and spin. At least whn CNN fucks me they give me a reach around.
The worst part about absolute thickies like you is that you're so dumb you think you have the whole world figured out, so you can never learn. You read about the smith mundt repeal and now, since you are so clever, you have figured out the entirety of the american media landscape, and anything they write, anything challenging that comes out of the whole fucking institution and be ignored and dismissed. Haven't you heard of Smith mundt dawg? Everything is a lie.
Fuck you, moron. PM me your address so I can fly to your house and beat you up.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
fucking lol the public doesnt have any meaningful discussion specifically because its stifled by propaganda disseminated by the government
omg muh russia and stormy daniels amirite
hilarious, do you not believe honeypots exist or something
lol no
weird how ive been right about everything then huh, must be a fluke
so, confirmed youd never heard of it and were unaware obama made it law that its cool to lie to you lol
lol no the entire institution itself can be ignored
if you read american media youre automatically below the threshold of intelligence needed to have a real conversation
lol nobody pro american media can ever beat anyone up who are you fooling
1 PJmath 2018-05-27
Jesus christ. the memes have infected your brain, dude. I'm leaving for work right now but could you do me a favor and type this reply again, but this time write it like a fucking human and not an AI trained on 4chan comments, ok? I'll catch up with you in a few.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
yeah what you should do to be a smart person is watch american media and believe everything it says
get really angry with russia and hate yourself
t. faggot
1 DRUMPF_HUSSEIN_OBAMA 2018-05-27
So things will be balanced out a bit, at least.
1 TrueBlue98 2018-05-27
Balanced, as all things should be
1 grungebot5000 2018-05-27
hey, they invite them on
1 cintril 2018-05-27
as it should be
1 _pennwolf 2018-05-27
So real news?
1 abraham_pimpin 2018-05-27
https://imgur.com/HUqx9pG Musk Defense Force out in full force today
1 DammitEd 2018-05-27
So some rando with the name Stan Lee got his account verified by twitter as the comic book guy, and nobody doubts it until he says something the mob disagrees with? Hmmmmmm not buying it
1 Karlore473 2018-05-27
or the 100 year old man who has stated he doesnt run his accounts in the past isn't the one posting all of his generic canned tweets.
1 kilo73 2018-05-27
Jesus Christ. Talk about getting defensive.
1 Riencewind 2018-05-27
Frankly this whole debacle undercut my belief in Musk's other ideas.
1 xoiz 2018-05-27
Nice concern trolling, fuckboy.
1 Riencewind 2018-05-27
Oh. Are you in love?
1 ahbslldud 2018-05-27
I feel bad for this elderly-ass man who recently got his twitter set up and has jumped smack-dab into the middle of an obnoxious screeching ideological shitshow.
1 sevgee 2018-05-27
He's on twitter since 2009...
1 ahbslldud 2018-05-27
Oh really? For some reason I thought he just got on.
1 captainpriapism 2018-05-27
man bugs are gonna be torn between supporting marvel and getting real outraged att his huh
1 TriggeredNiggard 2018-05-27
Maybe bugs will educate themselves on the fact that Stan Lee is a parasitic hack fraud.
1 DuBBle 2018-05-27
Does anyone else feel Christmassy - looking at that sweet old man and his sweater? Cozy up near the fire in a nice comfy chair, read the first chapter of Mein Kampf and just finger yourself raw. Lovely season.
1 saddertadder 2018-05-27
0 to 100 real quick.
1 PM_me_GOODSHIT 2018-05-27
I think it's a great idea. More drama for us to feed on.
1 ZogJhones 2018-05-27
Good. The media is full of liars with an agenda
1 MargarineIsEvil 2018-05-27
The Musk Meltdown is my favourite drama in years. So many types of people I hate are chimping out over this.
1 zeldaisaprude 2018-05-27
First elon, then freeman, now stan lee. I can't wait until the day reddit turns on tom hanks.
1 HBlight 2018-05-27
Oh what did Freeman do?
Aside take a nap while some inept PR people pretended to be him for an AMA.
1 Sasukefan99 2018-05-27
He got #metoo'd
1 Commies_Suck 2018-05-27
What would those faggots be without fake news? What would they be without op eds predicting the end of the world?
1 doorbook 2018-05-27
When trump says fake news he is against free speech and a lair, when Musk say it its for humanity good. We are not forgotten the backlash against TopGear and the lawsuit Musk lost twice over there review. He is no different than a dictator using his army to silence people, instead of military he use lawyers.
1 73696D756C6174696F6E 2018-05-27
Hmmm
1 cuteman 2018-05-27
And then people mass report Stan Lee.
Stan Lee's impressions get throttled by Twitter and later Facebook.
1 thats_a_bit_pathetic 2018-05-27
It was a fucking joke to make a point lmao he was gonna name it after a Soviet ministry that used to edit newspapers in Russia so they don't say anything too risky lol