I can only confidently guarantee that the prostitute you end up making tender love to (lol) will shower longer than she usually does after your 5 shameful minutes of disappointing her
Sorry to seriouspost, but why can't these people just be wiped from the face of the Earth already?
Even as a reviewer, he seemed awful.
/u/DubiousMerchant please nail your bussy to a tree, as another poster here said, if all """journalists""" reviewed like TB cancergate wouldn't have been a thing.
As long as you don't play video games to have fun, TB's reviews were great. If you play video games just to make sure they turn on and off, he had you covered.
I'm kinda taking the piss, but [seriousface] mechanics are not the entirety of a game's fun. Soulsborne fun is at least 40% determined by level design amd atmosphere.
if all """journalists""" reviewed like TB, then BideoGate wouldn't have been a thing. He was one of the best reviewers out there as far as being objective about scoring.
I remember when some shithead indie developer started shitting on TB on Twitter for some reason, so TB said he wouldn't do a video on the game because his view was soured and he would be biased against the game because of the insults.
However you feel about him, he was definitely a cut above the scumbags in the industry.
The word you're looking for is literally, which has been used as an intensifier for over four hundred years - as long as modern English has existed. Replacing it with figuratively or metaphorically is incorrect. Stop letting retards change your grammar.
He was one of the best reviewers out there as far as being objective about scoring.
Sure, in the sense that he wasn't as awful as the average. He still was not as good as some older publications, all the objectivity in the world doesn't make up for the lack of content about gameplay.
Having sliders and options is good, but it's not the whole deal. That doesn't help TB being ass at games and using a fire weapon against the flaming boss of flames (which is red, covered in fire, and displays a "resists fire damage" message under his healthbar) while complaining about how tanky the enemies are.
1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 1:22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth. 1:23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day. 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. 1:30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. 1:31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. 2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. 2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. 2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made. 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, 2:5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. 2:6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. 2:8 And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed. 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil. 2:10 And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.
From what I understand was that a woman named Zoe Quinn had sex with game reviewers to get positive feedback on her game. People were angry about her doing this and also because she had a boyfriend. A lot of people said this was slut shaming or that they were hating her because she was a woman. Something like that.
Its what happens when you have a large fanbase on the internet period. It isn't a matter of cultivation, its a matter of when you have a million followers its not unreasonable to imagine 500 of them are shitheads, whatever your topic or behavior and however you try to get them to act.
/u/SirFreire, I like how your reasonable take gets downvoted by the deranged harpies of Ghazi. You should get out before you are turned to their Borgish ways, famalam.
Nice job punishing the only person there who's not cowardly disgracing the name of a young cancer victim based on the actions of unassociated Twitter trolls, you spineless fucking cunt.
And of course you do it under the guise of stopping 'concern trolling', aka SJW dog whistle of the month, conveniently right after that same user destroyed your poisonous, hateful reasoning and exposed you as the embarrassment that you are. If there was any justice in the universe, the cancer in TBs ass would've transferred through the ether and directly into your fat fucking face.
Yes, that lolcow in particular really seems to take the monotonous stupidity of ghazi very seriously. Wishing cancer on her seems like an unnecessary compliment, given the absolute state of her behaviour.
Not satisfied with weaponizing minorities in the ironically named #notyourshield, they're literally using the memory of a dead person for their own gain. Neat.
Not content with merely being a vessel of sickening irony overflowing with bile, /u/Bloo_Driver cannot stop at just telling minorities what they should and shouldn't do and moves on to using the unburied corpse of a man he openly despises to pear-clutch about human decency on said man's behalf.
/u/wholetyouinhere every single culture on this earth has given moral weight to respect of the dead for a reason, and is not because they were simpletons that coudnt understand the enlightened logic and reason of neckbeards like yourself
Why would you respect a dead person that was awful in life? Does death magically make, say, Andrew Breitbart not an awful person the world is better without?
What an odd thing to say. The comment I made in the linked thread wasn't about TB. It was about the social prohibition against speaking ill of the dead, which I don't buy into. So it's doubly strange that you're trying to impress upon me how important Totalbiscuit was -- I paid no attention to the guy, and I don't know much about him. I don't particularly care either.
I also don't buy into fame or the hierarchy it desperately struggles to confer in western societies. The only thing that matters to me about a person is how they live their lives, and how they treat other people. Fame is utterly meaningless to me. So it makes no sense to me that you're trying to insult me based on how many people "think about me" -- I couldn't care less about that. I care what those closest to me think, and if it's negative, I try to become a better person.
You are right, it was more you endorsing the hate jerk done by Ghazi over a dead guy that did fuck all to them. Ghazi users are delusional and unhinged and play it nice and loose with reality and facts.
I'm not sure how I endorsed any hate jerk. The tenor of the thread was "Please guys, let's not disrespect this guy. He just died!" I mildly pushed back against that sentiment in what turned out to be a lively discussion involving conflicting viewpoints. Which dumps a bit of water on the whole "hate jerk" depiction.
And I'd remind you that you're speaking to an unhinged and delusional Ghazi user right now. I know it's easier to paint a group with a broad brush, since it makes it easier to write them off. But it is funny how those labels break down in one-on-one conversations. It's almost as if they are inaccurate and misleading. But what do I know?
The tenor of that thread was to be polite? Since when is Ghazi ever polite to people that don't jerk hard enough with them?
Please don't play up how Ghazi isn't crazy. The fucking mod stickies insulting the entire subscriber base as disgusting racists is peak lolcow and if you are still around Ghazi in 2018 you deserve the broad brush.
I can tell by the way that you respond to conflict with pseudo-intellectual bullshit that you're a meek, timid person.
The dude was a vidoegame critic. How fucked up do you have to be to make that into a political position? He never killed anyone, never manipulated the stock market to his advantage, and never made a dollar off the backs of third world laborers.
Have some perspective. Not respecting cultural norms doesn't make you smart or edgy. It makes you an unlikeable loner.
It's amazing how much you think you know about other people based on text on a screen. You don't know fuck-all. What you call "conflict" I call dumb people being stupid on the internet. It's meaningless to me. What did you want me to do? Throw a hissy fit? Try to intimidate people via text?
And I don't know how many times I have to say this, but I don't know much about TB, I'm not a fan, and I don't really care.
Judging by your response I think I was spot on. If its meaningless to you, why did you even respond? Is it because the only thing in your life you can take even the smallest amount of pride in is your internet persona?
I'm summoned here because this sub is upset that I don't have enough respect for the dead, and your response is to demonstrate that you don't care about respect for the dead in the first place. Sooooo... why am I here again?
Hey man, you convinced me there earlier and I agree with you totally. Awful people shouldn't be respected, hence why I'll be dropping nasty ones on your grave.
1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 1:22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth. 1:23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day. 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. 1:30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. 1:31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. 2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. 2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. 2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made. 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, 2:5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. 2:6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. 2:8 And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed. 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil. 2:10 And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.
What do you mean "you people"? Are you talking to me, or do you think I can summon the minds of 16,000 people inside of my head and somehow offer a consensus view? As to your bizarre thoughts on sex offenders, I can't even venture a reply, since it makes no sense.
Unless it's a joke, which would be even stranger. That's such a specific percentage.
Are you talking to me, or do you think I can summon the minds of 16.000 people...
Why not? You all think identically, and in the rare event that you don’t, you ban anyone who steps out of line.
Also gotta love the ghazi cocksuckers desperate appeals to be taken at individual face value, when the only reason they’d ever visit a place like ghazi in the first place would be to revel in anonymous groupthink and group bullying.
This comment coming from someone who thinks going through someone's post history is an argument isn't really rich, more indicative of how thick the average yank is.
What's really funny here, aside from the fact that you keep altering your comment, is that you started the first iteration of this comment by taking me to task for going through your comment history... Then you went through my comment history, posted the results, and deleted what you said earlier about how going through comment histories is a bad thing. (Also you deleted your comment calling me a "yank" after you figured out I'm not even American LOL)
Also, not that you care, but TorontoAnarchy isn't an anarchist sub and I don't moderate it. It's a Toronto sub with no posting rules, where literally every member is a moderator -- that's the joke.
You are a stupid person who does stupid things. Try to be less stupid in the future.
When you make a comment insulting someone for engaging in a certain behaviour, then you engage in that same behaviour, and edit your comment to remove all mention of it, that's really all I need to know.
You couldn't care less about proving or disproving anything, you use words solely as a means to cause pain -- while your own internal contradictions and confusion don't matter, and integrity or consistency clearly mean nothing to you.
I'm aware there are people in this World who don't deserve much respect in death, but I can't think of anything TB ever did that would make a slow death to a wasting disease seem a fitting and deserved end...
mostly people complain he was vaguely pro-gg ("he must be a misogynistic harasser!!!"), that he made an other kind joke ("transphobe!!!!"), that he threw someone out of a con for a trap joke ("omg SJW!!!"), or that he told someone to get cancer once (ignoring the fact he apologised like six years ago). Note how two of those contradict each other, and none are actually really noteworthy in the first place.
Sometimes you'll find someone a little smarter who'll bring up that he used to (sometimes purposefully, sometimes not) get his fans to dogpile people. Which he also apologised for, predictably.
You'll also find people mixing up the "sending fans after people" and the "vaguely pro-gg" to make "he literally sent trolls after people/women/anti-ggers because he's a gger!!!". Needless to say, this never happened.
I actually agree with you. I don't really know who TotalBiscuit is, so I can't speak for him in particular, but I don't know why people here are moralizing over "respecting the dead". On top of death suddenly not making people sacrosanct from criticism, there's a certain group on this sub that will go "ya empathy is for faggots kys" and then virtue signal about things like respecting TotalBiscuit's memory.
Death doesnt make a bad person suddenly a good one
No one said that
Now no need to mention how TB wasnt a bad person, everyone with half a brain knows that. But what death does however is create a time were people ought to shut the fuck up about the wrongs of this person who wont ever be able to defend themselves and to make up for their wrongs and vices.
Personally, I'm not convinced that TB was anything other than the usual human being-- some flaws, some strengths. Which is the first time I've said anything substantive about them man, anywhere -- which is interesting, because nearly every single upset /r/drama user that has replied to me in this thread has taken the issue of TotalBiscuit up with me, personally, based on the fact that I commented in the linked thread. I'm getting the impression that the more vocal users of this sub are not good with reading comprehension or nuance.
And I hear what you're saying, but I don't agree. Which is why I made the initial comment. If you know the person, or their friends/family, you're at the funeral, you're writing the obituary, sure, it's only natural to be tactful. If you're a stranger on an anonymous web forum, and someone has done something horrible in life that contradicts the outpouring of support, by all means say it. I don't think TB is necessarily the right person to take that to heart with, but my point is that unquestioning respect shouldn't be automatic. It depends on the person and the actions in question.
Look dude, talking shit about the dead is usually something people reserve for literal mass murderes. I am saying that there are good reasons for this. Is just a matter of moral intuition and you want to tackle this from a consequentialist pov.
But even from a consequentialist pov is not a good idea. You might be creating additional harm to those who loved him and end up finding the stupid shit people say about him online.
I partly agree, and partly do not. Not very dramatic, but that's all I can say.
I have to say, I'm more than a little surprised to see this ideal being upheld by so many users in a subreddit that overlaps hard with Reddit's reactionary communities, where "free speech" is a non-negotiable way of life. Reactionary politics and silent reverence for the dead are two things I did not think compatible. If some bland internet gaming celeb with a mildly left-leaning audience dies some day soon, I'll have to check back -- I'm sure everyone here will be super respectful.
All I know about this guy is that he was a big figure for GamerGate, had a tendency to say bigoted things, was ironically fond of telling people to "get cancer" as an insult and knowingly used his large fanbase to attack women in or adjacent to the industry.
Man, TB is an absolute drama machine. Even dead, he continues to booty blast people. As he already said when he was living https://mobile.twitter.com/totalbiscuit/status/984907055743021056?lang=en it's incredible amazing. I pray to god that I don't have to be/work with someone as righteous as self centered as ghazi posters
I wanna just violently jerk it to how terrible these pieces of shit are, but I don't really have room to talk given that this headline makes me kek joyfully every time I run across it.
I love that half of them call him harasser and on twitter they call him a nazi, while other groups think he is an SJW for that whole "are traps gay" thing.
So why is TB even in the same conversation as margret thatcher? He never wielded political power, held the public trust, or ordered military action. How dumb are you to waste that kind of mental energy on criticizing a dead games journalist?
If you were mature, you'd wait for a while before bringing him up again, but you want to be an edgelord and cash in on the attention speaking ill of the dead gives you.
I'm not going to post in that garbage sub, but I invite you to re-read my posts and learn reading comprehension, and see that I was actively telling people not to be so zealous in their criticism of John Bain, and calling for nuance. Thanks for your garbage input though.
“I won’t be posting the garbage sub where people are actually free to speak freely. I’m going to stay here in my self inflicted gulag-for-cunts, nyanya.
He’s probably a thirty five year old adult man too. Haha.
Eh, no, because the man's dead, has no way to make amends and the only thing that bringing up the bad things he did mere days after his passing does is make the person doing it look hateful and add pain to a grieving widow who lost her husband far too young to a horrible wasting death. There's a period of time where people want to focus on the good things someone who passed did. Its part of the grieving process and something everyone needs to do. Shitting on the dude days after his death is only going to make enemies and it isnt likely to convince anyone who wasn't already convinced. Especially since most of those receipts are 3+ years old and people have already brought up the one from years back about him wishing cancer on someone that had been apologized for and amends made with the target (who was pissed it was brought up and viewed the matter as settled). Its unproductive if you really want people to be better.
I’m constantly baffled by what Jim Sterling sees in him to consider him such a valuable friend considering some of his actions. Even now over on Jim’s subreddit they’re busy lionizing him like he never did anything wrong and it’s WEIRD. My personal stance is “he’s dead, not much he can do now” but I sit and look at his fans (and even people who didn’t care about him) doing this stuff and I’m just baffled...
you are defending a guy who doxxes and harasses people. Has his little minions doxx and harass children.
151 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-05-28
I can only confidently guarantee that the prostitute you end up making tender love to (lol) will shower longer than she usually does after your 5 shameful minutes of disappointing her
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2018-05-28
Sorry to seriouspost, but why can't these people just be wiped from the face of the Earth already?
/u/DubiousMerchant please nail your bussy to a tree, as another poster here said, if all """journalists""" reviewed like TB cancergate wouldn't have been a thing.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-05-28
You don't deserve to live.
1 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2018-05-28
LynchMeDaddyGate
1 Cdace 2018-05-28
Dinogate is about ethics in dinosaur 🦖 journalism
1 Wimzer 2018-05-28
Please never leave
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-05-28
Where did the spinosaurus touched you fam ?
1 Cdace 2018-05-28
In my gaming ethics
1 -OrganisedChaos- 2018-05-28
Was Dinogate the whole thing with Brontosaurus?
1 Cdace 2018-05-28
It is about the incident with these voluptuous raptors
1 -OrganisedChaos- 2018-05-28
My Eyes.
1 DannyLee90 2018-05-28
🤔🤔🤔
1 myshl0ng 2018-05-28
That's racist
1 HailSanta2512 2018-05-28
gatekeepinggate 🙄
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2018-05-28
As long as you don't play video games to have fun, TB's reviews were great. If you play video games just to make sure they turn on and off, he had you covered.
1 Awayfone 2018-05-28
But what kind of sliders does it have? That what I care about
1 saddertadder 2018-05-28
FOV
SLIDERS
ARE
IN
THIS
GAME
10/10
1 I_DRINK_TO_FORGET 2018-05-28
He had some insight into game mechanics also if you watched further than the 5 minute mark.
You know, the thing that determines if a game is fun.
1 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2018-05-28
I agree - skipping the first part of the video showcasing settings made for better quality videos.
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2018-05-28
I'm kinda taking the piss, but [seriousface] mechanics are not the entirety of a game's fun. Soulsborne fun is at least 40% determined by level design amd atmosphere.
1 Capital_Rope 2018-05-28
I remember when some shithead indie developer started shitting on TB on Twitter for some reason, so TB said he wouldn't do a video on the game because his view was soured and he would be biased against the game because of the insults.
However you feel about him, he was definitely a cut above the scumbags in the industry.
1 Grammar-Bolshevik 2018-05-28
.. Would you say he was, a paragon of video game journalism?..
1 nanonan 2018-05-28
More like the antithesis of video game journalism.
1 carthoris26 2018-05-28
The word you're looking for is literally, which has been used as an intensifier for over four hundred years - as long as modern English has existed. Replacing it with figuratively or metaphorically is incorrect. Stop letting retards change your grammar.
1 jasos-2005 2018-05-28
whooosh
1 SethRichOrDieTryin 2018-05-28
this is figuratively a bad comment
1 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2018-05-28
Admins are retards confirmed.
1 old_grumpy_grandpa 2018-05-28
Sure, in the sense that he wasn't as awful as the average. He still was not as good as some older publications, all the objectivity in the world doesn't make up for the lack of content about gameplay.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2018-05-28
You could get a perfect score from TB just by including a bunch of bullshit video options that do literally nothing
1 IsADragon 2018-05-28
Well we can all tell you're not a pc gamer. Half the fun is toggling the sliders for max fov and frame rate
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2018-05-28
U fukn nerf
1 old_grumpy_grandpa 2018-05-28
Having sliders and options is good, but it's not the whole deal. That doesn't help TB being ass at games and using a fire weapon against the flaming boss of flames (which is red, covered in fire, and displays a "resists fire damage" message under his healthbar) while complaining about how tanky the enemies are.
1 jimmahdean 2018-05-28
This sounds like Path of Exile to me, where enemy resistances literally don't matter.
1 old_grumpy_grandpa 2018-05-28
It was shadow warrior 2 I think.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2018-05-28
Gamergate was always going to be a thing because those filthy females are still trying to get their harpy claws on our safe space
1 HydroDragon 2018-05-28
Is any place you find a group of incels really a safe space?
1 theevilmango 2018-05-28
1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 1:22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth. 1:23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day. 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. 1:30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. 1:31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. 2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. 2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. 2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made. 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, 2:5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. 2:6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. 2:8 And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed. 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil. 2:10 And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.
1 HydroDragon 2018-05-28
Now that is some fucking spam, can I get some eggs with that?
1 _pennwolf 2018-05-28
You mean literally, we need something like bullyhunters for SJWs exceptnot fake and gay
1 LSU_Coonass 2018-05-28
This may be true but I fucking hated his voice. So I didn’t watch much of his shit.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-05-28
Anyone with an opinion regarded gamergate should be banned from the internet.
1 PurpleIcy 2018-05-28
Explain to me what gamergate is.
1 Capital_Rope 2018-05-28
Rapists vs. non-rapists
1 PurpleIcy 2018-05-28
So who's the rapist?
1 lifesbrink 2018-05-28
Trick question, both sides are.
1 KalebCS 2018-05-28
Provably wrong.
1 Ewindal 2018-05-28
Sarah Nyberg iirc
1 PurpleIcy 2018-05-28
Thanks for nightmare fuel.
1 ComedicSans 2018-05-28
Rapists vs Incels, you mean.
1 xoiz 2018-05-28
Current rapists vs future rapists.
1 SwiftyNiftyShitfy360 2018-05-28
From what I understand was that a woman named Zoe Quinn had sex with game reviewers to get positive feedback on her game. People were angry about her doing this and also because she had a boyfriend. A lot of people said this was slut shaming or that they were hating her because she was a woman. Something like that.
1 NeoModerateOne 2018-05-28
All it really was was some guy writing a blog post about how badly his girlfriend treated him.
Turns out she was sucking lots of journo cock, adn they put on their white armor.
1 PurpleIcy 2018-05-28
Only a woman would do that so they aren't wrong, they were hating her because she was a vermin.
1 CaesarCzechReborn 2018-05-28
Well hello There General Kenobi.
1 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2018-05-28
/u/SirFreire, I like how your reasonable take gets downvoted by the deranged harpies of Ghazi. You should get out before you are turned to their Borgish ways, famalam.
1 shallowm 2018-05-28
>implying that /r/GamerGhazi isn't mostly maleoids
1 trapochaphouse 2018-05-28
I bet there's massive overlap between ghazi and menslib.
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2018-05-28
1 MozzerDozzer 2018-05-28
Marpies
1 PossibleYoung 2018-05-28
zz
1 MagicHoudini 2018-05-28
The age of soy has begun
1 ZeitgeistNow 2018-05-28
On that note
/u/Caelrie
Nice job punishing the only person there who's not cowardly disgracing the name of a young cancer victim based on the actions of unassociated Twitter trolls, you spineless fucking cunt.
And of course you do it under the guise of stopping 'concern trolling', aka SJW dog whistle of the month, conveniently right after that same user destroyed your poisonous, hateful reasoning and exposed you as the embarrassment that you are. If there was any justice in the universe, the cancer in TBs ass would've transferred through the ether and directly into your fat fucking face.
1 murloughmun 2018-05-28
Yes, that lolcow in particular really seems to take the monotonous stupidity of ghazi very seriously. Wishing cancer on her seems like an unnecessary compliment, given the absolute state of her behaviour.
1 LemonScore 2018-05-28
Not content with merely being a vessel of sickening irony overflowing with bile, /u/Bloo_Driver cannot stop at just telling minorities what they should and shouldn't do and moves on to using the unburied corpse of a man he openly despises to pear-clutch about human decency on said man's behalf.
1 Pepperglue 2018-05-28
No u, u/Bloo_Driver, I am #notyourshield.
1 COMMUNIST_WARRIOR 2018-05-28
Imagine caring this much about a dead man who reviewed children's toys that you literally write essays about how evil he was.
/u/oxochx, you have autism. Please seek help.
1 Spheros 2018-05-28
Imagine caring about Battlefield.
1 Matthew1J 2018-05-28
What help is there to be found? (Asking for a friend)
1 Morgoff 2018-05-28
/u/HamsPics Randomly calling one a sex offender? It's because he's on a government register. Why always OK with sex offenders if they're on your team?
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-05-28
If #metoo has taught us anything, it's because they're ALL sex offenders.
1 ahbslldud 2018-05-28
Right? So now he didn't rape that little girl because he criticized le ebin bideo jame man on twitter? Nice to see their priorities are in line.
1 siskonaut 2018-05-28
"Randomly"
1 PossibleYoung 2018-05-28
zz.? what is zz.reddit.com?
1 throwaway172992 2018-05-28
zoz
1 A7thStone 2018-05-28
zle
1 xoiz 2018-05-28
zle
1 Sc0ttyDoesntKn0w 2018-05-28
They make it seem like it’s so hard to just be quiet and move on with your life without dancing on the grave of someone you dislike.
Why can’t ghazi and Kia just hate fuck each other and get over it already.
1 Destirigon 2018-05-28
Because both are too ugly for the other to consider them a potential partner.
1 Singulaire 2018-05-28
I mean, as much as I hate ghazelles, I still wouldn't wish on them the abject misery of having sex with me.
1 RakeNI 2018-05-28
Because ghazi would probably claim rape afterwards
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-05-28
Ahhh "le gamerghazi" different side, yet equally retarded. Twats, you sound like those alt right kiatards you so much hate.
1 tfdidido 2018-05-28
/u/allcopsrbastards do you even know what the word reactionary means kid?
1 tfdidido 2018-05-28
/u/wholetyouinhere every single culture on this earth has given moral weight to respect of the dead for a reason, and is not because they were simpletons that coudnt understand the enlightened logic and reason of neckbeards like yourself
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
Why would you respect a dead person that was awful in life? Does death magically make, say, Andrew Breitbart not an awful person the world is better without?
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-05-28
When you die, no one will hate you. They won't think about you at all.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
This is probably true, actually. That's true of most people. What is the point you're trying to make?
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-05-28
That people actually gave a shit about TB while alive and dead.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
What an odd thing to say. The comment I made in the linked thread wasn't about TB. It was about the social prohibition against speaking ill of the dead, which I don't buy into. So it's doubly strange that you're trying to impress upon me how important Totalbiscuit was -- I paid no attention to the guy, and I don't know much about him. I don't particularly care either.
I also don't buy into fame or the hierarchy it desperately struggles to confer in western societies. The only thing that matters to me about a person is how they live their lives, and how they treat other people. Fame is utterly meaningless to me. So it makes no sense to me that you're trying to insult me based on how many people "think about me" -- I couldn't care less about that. I care what those closest to me think, and if it's negative, I try to become a better person.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-05-28
You are right, it was more you endorsing the hate jerk done by Ghazi over a dead guy that did fuck all to them. Ghazi users are delusional and unhinged and play it nice and loose with reality and facts.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
I'm not sure how I endorsed any hate jerk. The tenor of the thread was "Please guys, let's not disrespect this guy. He just died!" I mildly pushed back against that sentiment in what turned out to be a lively discussion involving conflicting viewpoints. Which dumps a bit of water on the whole "hate jerk" depiction.
And I'd remind you that you're speaking to an unhinged and delusional Ghazi user right now. I know it's easier to paint a group with a broad brush, since it makes it easier to write them off. But it is funny how those labels break down in one-on-one conversations. It's almost as if they are inaccurate and misleading. But what do I know?
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-05-28
The tenor of that thread was to be polite? Since when is Ghazi ever polite to people that don't jerk hard enough with them?
Please don't play up how Ghazi isn't crazy. The fucking mod stickies insulting the entire subscriber base as disgusting racists is peak lolcow and if you are still around Ghazi in 2018 you deserve the broad brush.
1 SuperObviousShill 2018-05-28
I can tell by the way that you respond to conflict with pseudo-intellectual bullshit that you're a meek, timid person.
The dude was a vidoegame critic. How fucked up do you have to be to make that into a political position? He never killed anyone, never manipulated the stock market to his advantage, and never made a dollar off the backs of third world laborers.
Have some perspective. Not respecting cultural norms doesn't make you smart or edgy. It makes you an unlikeable loner.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
It's amazing how much you think you know about other people based on text on a screen. You don't know fuck-all. What you call "conflict" I call dumb people being stupid on the internet. It's meaningless to me. What did you want me to do? Throw a hissy fit? Try to intimidate people via text?
And I don't know how many times I have to say this, but I don't know much about TB, I'm not a fan, and I don't really care.
1 SuperObviousShill 2018-05-28
Judging by your response I think I was spot on. If its meaningless to you, why did you even respond? Is it because the only thing in your life you can take even the smallest amount of pride in is your internet persona?
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
Okay, then. How should I have reacted to the "conflict" in this thread?
Serious question -- what should I have done? What, in your eyes, is the correct response when someone calls you out on reddit?
1 SuperObviousShill 2018-05-28
Conjecture that the other person is a homosexual, and demand they rate pictures of your cock.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
Okay thanks. I'll note that in the future, for my files.
Also, what specifically is bad about meek people?
1 SuperObviousShill 2018-05-28
Nothing, if they're nice. Arrogant blowhards who are actually too scared to back up the shit they talk are quite another thing.
1 murloughmun 2018-05-28
You evidently know fuck all, as evidenced by the absolute horseshit flowing out of your tiny brain.
1 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2018-05-28
Then hush and listen to those with livid experiences.
1 saddertadder 2018-05-28
YIKES
ya fukken dense, kid
1 wulf-focker 2018-05-28
Good point. When you die one day, I'll take a nice runny dump on your grave.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
So, to recap:
I'm summoned here because this sub is upset that I don't have enough respect for the dead, and your response is to demonstrate that you don't care about respect for the dead in the first place. Sooooo... why am I here again?
1 wulf-focker 2018-05-28
Hey man, you convinced me there earlier and I agree with you totally. Awful people shouldn't be respected, hence why I'll be dropping nasty ones on your grave.
1 lifesbrink 2018-05-28
lololool
1 Morgoff 2018-05-28
The idea is to get people on ghazi to come on here and spout some stupid shit.
Then everyone makes fun or just abuses them because you're all insufferable twats.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
Wow. Mission accomplished.
1 theevilmango 2018-05-28
1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 1:22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth. 1:23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day. 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. 1:30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. 1:31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. 2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. 2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. 2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made. 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, 2:5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. 2:6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. 2:8 And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed. 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil. 2:10 And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
I understand.
1 GenitalGesticulation 2018-05-28
Why do you people shit on people with different opinions like they're the devil when at least 60% of ghazi users are sex offenders?
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
What do you mean "you people"? Are you talking to me, or do you think I can summon the minds of 16,000 people inside of my head and somehow offer a consensus view? As to your bizarre thoughts on sex offenders, I can't even venture a reply, since it makes no sense.
Unless it's a joke, which would be even stranger. That's such a specific percentage.
1 Capital_Rope 2018-05-28
What doesn't make sense about the fact that you're all a bunch of sex offenders?
1 GenitalGesticulation 2018-05-28
Ghazi poster (you people) are holier than thou over dumb pseudo-political video game opinions yet many of you are actual, real sex offenders.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
Okay.
1 niczar 2018-05-28
Admitting your degenerate nature is a good first step, I commend you for it.
1 murloughmun 2018-05-28
Why not? You all think identically, and in the rare event that you don’t, you ban anyone who steps out of line.
Also gotta love the ghazi cocksuckers desperate appeals to be taken at individual face value, when the only reason they’d ever visit a place like ghazi in the first place would be to revel in anonymous groupthink and group bullying.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
This comment is coming from a The_Donald user is so fucking rich I can only eat half a slice.
1 murloughmun 2018-05-28
This comment coming from someone who thinks going through someone's post history is an argument isn't really rich, more indicative of how thick the average yank is.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
What's really funny here, aside from the fact that you keep altering your comment, is that you started the first iteration of this comment by taking me to task for going through your comment history... Then you went through my comment history, posted the results, and deleted what you said earlier about how going through comment histories is a bad thing. (Also you deleted your comment calling me a "yank" after you figured out I'm not even American LOL)
Also, not that you care, but TorontoAnarchy isn't an anarchist sub and I don't moderate it. It's a Toronto sub with no posting rules, where literally every member is a moderator -- that's the joke.
You are a stupid person who does stupid things. Try to be less stupid in the future.
1 murloughmun 2018-05-28
LOL fuck off and suck a dick you unironically neomarxist faggot.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
I guess I touched a nerve.
1 murloughmun 2018-05-28
Calm down, male rapist, one post in the donald isn't a crime. Unlike being a fucking cretinous neomarxist smh
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
Yes, I'm clearly the one who needs to calm down here. As opposed to the guy who keeps editing his comments and shouting angry taboo words.
1 murloughmun 2018-05-28
Editing his comments! Yikes, what a gotcha. That's almost as bad as not thinking everything is reactionary and racist.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
When you make a comment insulting someone for engaging in a certain behaviour, then you engage in that same behaviour, and edit your comment to remove all mention of it, that's really all I need to know.
You couldn't care less about proving or disproving anything, you use words solely as a means to cause pain -- while your own internal contradictions and confusion don't matter, and integrity or consistency clearly mean nothing to you.
There's no better word for that than "stupid."
1 murloughmun 2018-05-28
Thanks for the psychoanalysis, doc. Wouldn't you be more at home over on ghazi, with the other crybaby fucks?
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
This attitude is going to make you miserable. And it's only going to get worse as you get older.
1 nomad1c 2018-05-28
so what did he do that was so awful?
1 ShitCommentBelow 2018-05-28
I'm aware there are people in this World who don't deserve much respect in death, but I can't think of anything TB ever did that would make a slow death to a wasting disease seem a fitting and deserved end...
1 nomad1c 2018-05-28
yeah i'm guessing it's gonna be something like "he didn't disavow someone ghazi doesn't like" or whatever
1 MontyDillo 2018-05-28
mostly people complain he was vaguely pro-gg ("he must be a misogynistic harasser!!!"), that he made an other kind joke ("transphobe!!!!"), that he threw someone out of a con for a trap joke ("omg SJW!!!"), or that he told someone to get cancer once (ignoring the fact he apologised like six years ago). Note how two of those contradict each other, and none are actually really noteworthy in the first place.
Sometimes you'll find someone a little smarter who'll bring up that he used to (sometimes purposefully, sometimes not) get his fans to dogpile people. Which he also apologised for, predictably.
You'll also find people mixing up the "sending fans after people" and the "vaguely pro-gg" to make "he literally sent trolls after people/women/anti-ggers because he's a gger!!!". Needless to say, this never happened.
1 Ewindal 2018-05-28
How is MovieBlob saying "TB is awful" any better than TB saying "MovieBlog says I'm awful"?
1 shallowm 2018-05-28
I actually agree with you. I don't really know who TotalBiscuit is, so I can't speak for him in particular, but I don't know why people here are moralizing over "respecting the dead". On top of death suddenly not making people sacrosanct from criticism, there's a certain group on this sub that will go "ya empathy is for faggots kys" and then virtue signal about things like respecting TotalBiscuit's memory.
1 tfdidido 2018-05-28
The difference my exploding friend is that we dont believe we are right, and we dont believe we are good people
1 shallowm 2018-05-28
this is a lie, you only need to look at the arguments here to see how invested everyone involved gets
sorry sweaty, we're not special anymore
1 tfdidido 2018-05-28
thats only pizzashill and the autistic company though
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
So you don't want to be a good person? You just want to spend your short time on life making other people's lives worse?
1 tfdidido 2018-05-28
nigga this is the internet and a small sub that nobody gives a fuck, chill the fuck out
if you see me murdering someone you can call me out
1 tfdidido 2018-05-28
Death doesnt make a bad person suddenly a good one
No one said that
Now no need to mention how TB wasnt a bad person, everyone with half a brain knows that. But what death does however is create a time were people ought to shut the fuck up about the wrongs of this person who wont ever be able to defend themselves and to make up for their wrongs and vices.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
Personally, I'm not convinced that TB was anything other than the usual human being-- some flaws, some strengths. Which is the first time I've said anything substantive about them man, anywhere -- which is interesting, because nearly every single upset /r/drama user that has replied to me in this thread has taken the issue of TotalBiscuit up with me, personally, based on the fact that I commented in the linked thread. I'm getting the impression that the more vocal users of this sub are not good with reading comprehension or nuance.
And I hear what you're saying, but I don't agree. Which is why I made the initial comment. If you know the person, or their friends/family, you're at the funeral, you're writing the obituary, sure, it's only natural to be tactful. If you're a stranger on an anonymous web forum, and someone has done something horrible in life that contradicts the outpouring of support, by all means say it. I don't think TB is necessarily the right person to take that to heart with, but my point is that unquestioning respect shouldn't be automatic. It depends on the person and the actions in question.
1 tfdidido 2018-05-28
Look dude, talking shit about the dead is usually something people reserve for literal mass murderes. I am saying that there are good reasons for this. Is just a matter of moral intuition and you want to tackle this from a consequentialist pov.
But even from a consequentialist pov is not a good idea. You might be creating additional harm to those who loved him and end up finding the stupid shit people say about him online.
1 wholetyouinhere 2018-05-28
I partly agree, and partly do not. Not very dramatic, but that's all I can say.
I have to say, I'm more than a little surprised to see this ideal being upheld by so many users in a subreddit that overlaps hard with Reddit's reactionary communities, where "free speech" is a non-negotiable way of life. Reactionary politics and silent reverence for the dead are two things I did not think compatible. If some bland internet gaming celeb with a mildly left-leaning audience dies some day soon, I'll have to check back -- I'm sure everyone here will be super respectful.
1 tfdidido 2018-05-28
" i dont get it why cant i talk trash about the guy who died of cancer at 33? he said mean words online from time to time "
My fucking god this is worse than peak r/atheism and cb together
1 GenitalGesticulation 2018-05-28
And they're getting their bussies in a wad over "calling some random guy a sex offender" when he is AN ACTUAL REGISTERED SEX OFFENDER.
1 PoorLilMarco 2018-05-28
I'm pretty sure only one of those things are true /u/DubiousMerchant
1 ltedt 2018-05-28
Man, TB is an absolute drama machine. Even dead, he continues to booty blast people. As he already said when he was living https://mobile.twitter.com/totalbiscuit/status/984907055743021056?lang=en it's incredible amazing. I pray to god that I don't have to be/work with someone as righteous as self centered as ghazi posters
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-05-28
I think everybody involved in this drama are total retards. Case closed!
1 ahbslldud 2018-05-28
I wanna just violently jerk it to how terrible these pieces of shit are, but I don't really have room to talk given that this headline makes me kek joyfully every time I run across it.
1 NeadStork 2018-05-28
The people being harassed deserve it tbh.
1 telandrias 2018-05-28
Responding to reddit comments is harassment so fuck dead people the thread.
1 saint2e 2018-05-28
The cognitive dissonance is astounding.
1 LSDawson 2018-05-28
Internet squabbles are serious shit, no playin' ho
1 Bronafide 2018-05-28
A few days ago I was giving them credit for not being total trash human beings, oh well ghazi gonna ghazi
1 Awayfone 2018-05-28
They literally have civility as a rule. I guess it is good that can admit there are usually a bunch of petty harpies
1 znaXTdWhGV 2018-05-28
i'd trade every one of their lives for his in an instant
1 RakeNI 2018-05-28
I love that half of them call him harasser and on twitter they call him a nazi, while other groups think he is an SJW for that whole "are traps gay" thing.
TB. Nazi, SJW, Misogyist. LUL 7
1 MontyDillo 2018-05-28
the evil misogynistic transphobe gamergater
the evil she who threw someone out of a con for transphobia and has railed against his Audience for it multiple times
one and the same.
tribalism is depressing.
1 SuperObviousShill 2018-05-28
/u/darryshan
So why is TB even in the same conversation as margret thatcher? He never wielded political power, held the public trust, or ordered military action. How dumb are you to waste that kind of mental energy on criticizing a dead games journalist?
If you were mature, you'd wait for a while before bringing him up again, but you want to be an edgelord and cash in on the attention speaking ill of the dead gives you.
1 SuperObviousShill 2018-05-28
/u/darryshan
Nah, I think we should talk here where everyone can see it. I promise you that you won't be banned, and your comments won't be removed.
1 murloughmun 2018-05-28
“I won’t be posting the garbage sub where people are actually free to speak freely. I’m going to stay here in my self inflicted gulag-for-cunts, nyanya.
He’s probably a thirty five year old adult man too. Haha.
1 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2018-05-28
Unlike in that shithole you call Ghazi, /u/darryshan.
1 SuperObviousShill 2018-05-28
Reasonable opinion at -4 and sinking.
1 NeoModerateOne 2018-05-28
/u/Oharrier91
you are defending a guy who doxxes and harasses people. Has his little minions doxx and harass children.
1 Hammer_of_truthiness 2018-05-28
/u/caelrie continues being a completely reprehensible "human" being, ripping on a man a short few days after his painful death to cancer smDh.