It is "An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements"
He talks about how some of those movements were created and influenced by Jews and how they served mostly Jewish interests. Examples are immigration, freud''s psychoanalysis, boas school of athropology, change in immigration laws, communism etc.
Yeah, once they ruined eastern Europe they emigrated to US and pushed for creation of Israel where they murdered tens of thousands innocent Palestinians and displaced hundreds of thousands of people.
Oh weird how this other MDE homo showed up to support the book he never heard of and they both decided that they are maybe interested in some incel fanfic about how the jews made them failures.
I don't know what I love more, your butthurt downvoting or your """ironic""" raging homosexuality. Isn't you trying to get your dick sucked by dudes 24/7 exactly what the jews want?
If this is how you try to convince people of radical pseudoscientific bullshit, no wonder you fell for it in the first place. Fuck off illiterate cuck.
No, but it does work on your girlfriend. She usually just go down on her knees as suck my Dick for 10-20 minutes straight and then drink my seen and go give you goodnight kiss.
No, but it does work on your girlfriend. She usually just go down on her knees as suck my Dick for 10-20 minutes straight and then swallow cum and go give you goodnight kiss.
No, it's not. even Jews at r/Judaism were talking 4 days ago how a book is dangerous to them because no one really denied the arguments in the book and every response to the book was a strawman.
The conclusion was to get adl or someone else to disprove it.
But so far no one else did.
You don't believe me? Search post from last few days on r/Judaism by writing "culture of critique"
This book is really scientific with real claims taken from real academic literature - how can you even compare it to protocols?
I mean it is such a stupid claim that there is no way someone who have read it would compare both of those.
And if you haven't read it don't even respond - read it first and then I will happily talk about the book with you :)
Stopped reading. Yes it is. Stop denying this shit, it's embarrassing. You're an internet neo-nazi reading Jewish conspiracy theories and pretending they're something else.
How can you reject a work for being anti-semitic xD
Dude, you haven't read the book and those who criticised the book haven'the read it either. There was only one academic review of the book.
And even the jew admits that the review was strawmanny
HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHHAHAHAH xD
The problem is i never actually see these arguments being refuted by anyone, i only see people attacking strawmen, not actually understanding the argument, or just calling people anti-semitic and leaving it at that. There has been oneacademic refutation of Macdonald’s work, but fell a little flat as it was strawmanny and was rebutted rather thoroughly by macdonald himself.
So currently there are no serious rebuts to modern sources of anti-semitism, only strawmen and ad hominems, which personally feels a little lazy and unhelpful to tackle anti-semitism and its sources, and that to me is the most frightening thing.
I like how you keep trying to invoke /r/judaism as if they're some authority on shit like this, it's hilarious.
Anyone making arguments about how "Jews control the government" is not a valid source of information. It's paranoid delusion. Nobody credible entertains this bullshit because it's not worth entertaining.
Literally the instant you see someone make in an argument like this they are to be dismissed. In the same way if someone walks up and claims there's a lizard base on the moon they are to be dismissed.
And even the jew admits that the review was strawmanny
This right here reveals what you are. You're an internet neo-nazi. every bit as uneducated as the original, every bit as stupid as the original.
In the same way for example, a white Christian owning a media company doesn't mean the white race owns said media company.
That's 100% not true. Media companies are run owner''s and manager/editor/whatever''s perspective.
Different owner/editor/ceo means reporting will be different and will promote different values and beliefs.
Strawman, adhominem and personal attacks. I think if we were to dismiss somebody claims we should start with your on the basis of them being very emotional and unprofessional.
Your book is about conspirations when my book is about ingroup preferances.
But okay, I will read yours and you will read mine. What's the deadline?
Is your book about in group preference and political and intelektual movements viewed from evolutionary perspective?
My book is about how the brain works. The foibles found within the human brain, human story archetypes. The book is about why people like you believe the things you do, and why humans believe anything at all.
When (doesn't have to be exact) do you plan to read it?
Sometime in the next 2 days probably, it's very light reading and I read a few books a week.
I get books mostly from library or my bookstore - there was study about how you retain more information from physical books, but probably it won't be in my libraries so I will download ebook
From what I've read in this book, which isn't that far, the guy seems to really miss the point as to why Jews tend to favor the policies they do.
When you look at the broad historical context, and the fact Jews have been the go to scapegoat in western Christian society for any number of disasters, even the black plague, most Jews believing the things they believe isn't shocking and it isn't evidence to support the views that are oh so common on MDE.
When you look at the broad historical context, and the fact Jews have been the go to scapegoat in western Christian society for any number of disasters, even the black plague, most Jews believing the things they believe isn't shocking
Exactly, it is their evolutionary strategy.
and it isn't evidence to support the views that are oh so common on MDE.
The book wasn't written by mde and the most radical claims are written by people who read Mein Kampf or are memeing, not the People who read "Culture of Critique"
I mean: Sam Hyde is Jewish comedian and he pushed for jokes that Jews support 6 thousand years old Talmud conspiracy to opress goyim.
But again - that's not what the book is about.
There is quite a big chance that you way agree with some claims in the book, the book is actually pretty objective
But this isn't really correct. There's a difference between an evolutionary strategy unique to Jewish people and Jewish people, due to a history of oppression, being pushed in certain directions.
Black Americans for example. There's a reason why black people tend to be so common in various social justice movements. It isn't an evolutionary strategy, it's because of history.
Ethnic identity tends to be important to many people. It's why my mother, after learning her family was polish, dived right in and started talking about Slavic oppression. Believing that something unjust happened to her people changed the way she viewed the world.
This wasn't an evolutionary strategy.
In the case of Jews, take the example of Hollywood. Due to economic discrimination that was present across the entire western world for a number of years, Jews were primarily confined to certain occupations.
There's a book called "the movie moguls" that goes into more detail here, but this article goes over some of it:
Having either been born in America or come from Europe in their childhood or youth, most of the moguls could be classified as second-generation American Jews, from poor or modest-income families. They were exceptionally industrious and ambitious, and, interestingly, quite a few came to the motion picture industry from various retail trades, particularly the garment industry. Zukor and Loew, for example, began as furriers, Fox and Laemmle as clothing merchants, Goldwyn as a glove salesman. Control was enterprisingly gained over theaters and, later, over studios, linking distribution and production.
The creation of the two industries was not utterly dissimilar. Both in clothing and motion pictures Jewish entrepreneurs, starting from a mass distribution base, created mass production industries for garments and entertainment. With daring and finesse, they organized innumerable individual skills (of sewing or photographing) for the vast market of voiceless consumers.
This was not an evolutionary strategy but the natural conclusion of economic discrimination across the entire western world for a number of years.
You confine Jews to certain professions, and when economic liberalization started taking place, those professions they were confined to happened to be compatible with what was going on in Hollywood.
Yes and no. There are different processes that took place at the same time. Those are both genes, culture, situation etc.
Jews have also extremely high in group preference and it is quite common for Jews to say that the west needs open borders, diversity, multiculturalism but when asked about Israel they won't answer or say no.
They feel safe in multicultural societies because they learn that non-diverse societies tend to be less tolerant towards Jewish behaviour whether real or imaginary. That's also why tolerance became a thing in 20th century.
Before ithis word wasn't used as much and you didn't feel the need to be tolerant and suddenly 20th century the word is being used.
As for blacks - the reason why they in social justice movements is because Jews started those movement's and pushe'd blacks in.
The blacks didn't actually benefit from that. Their quality of life is even worse. Single motherhood is worse than in the sixties, youth unemployment too.
Civil rights movements were pushed by the Jews.
Feminism too BTW.
On Wikipedia there is 2 times more feminists that were Jewish than every type of feminists (by religion)
And atheists feminists are also in huge part Jewish.
Why?
Because conflict men - women and blacks - whites benefit them much more than a conflict Jews - goyim.
,+ of course in group preferance that makes them more likely to promote movements lead by Jews and that makes them more likely to accept college admissions from Jewish to be students
I am Polish and it would be easier for me to explain that in Polish if you speak Polish.
But if you don't I still have interestin fact that is related to polishness.
Have you heard about act.447?
It got voted in us parliament.
This act tells that Poles have to pay around 65 billion dollars to the Jewish organisations as a something we may call ww2 reparations.
Jews have also extremely high in group preference and it is quite common for Jews to say that the west needs open borders, diversity, multiculturalism but when asked about Israel they won't answer or say no.
Everyone has extremely high in group preference. It's called being a human. This is again, trying turn traits that are present in all humans into some uniquely Jewish trait.
They feel safe in multicultural societies because they learn that non-diverse societies tend to be less tolerant towards Jewish behaviour whether real or imaginary. That's also why tolerance became a thing in 20th century.
And again, the same thing. Most people that aren't in the majority push for more diversity because less diverse societies are less tolerant towards any outsider or minority. This is a truth that is universal, yet somehow, it's being claimed a unique Jewish trait.
Before ithis word wasn't used as much and you didn't feel the need to be tolerant and suddenly 20th century the word is being used.
Can you think of any major events in the 20th century that might have caused something like this? I wonder what could have caused society as a whole to maybe realize archaic prejudice isn't good.
As for blacks - the reason why they in social justice movements is because Jews started those movement's and pushe'd blacks in.
Lol? So now anyone that ever tries to fight for more civil rights and equality was in reality pushed there by the Jews. It isn't that some black people look at history, realized their people weren't treated so fairly, and maybe still aren't treated fairly, it's that the Jews made them do it.
The blacks didn't actually benefit from that. Their quality of life is even worse. Single motherhood is worse than in the sixties, youth unemployment too.
Wait, to be clear here, you believe that black quality of life today is worse than it was before the civil rights movement? Because according to empirical data, you're wrong in every way possible. The quality of life for black Americans has improved across the board.
This is a claim so absurd, so detached from reality, I'm starting to suspect you aren't very informed on any of these subjects and are just repeating things you want to be true, because they justify an underlying prejudice.
Civil rights movements were pushed by the Jews.
Ok? The civil rights movement was an objectively good thing. You will not fine a single sane person claiming the civil rights movement wasn't good.
Feminism too BTW.
Again - early feminism was an objectively good thing. If there really is some Jewish plot, you aren't doing a very good job of explaining why this plot is bad.
"but they gave the blacks civil rights.'
"but they gave women civil rights."
What?
Because conflict men - women and blacks - whites benefit them much more than a conflict Jews - goyim.
??
This act tells that Poles have to pay around 65 billion dollars to the Jewish organisations as a something we may call ww2 reparations.
the return to the rightful owner of wrongfully seized or transferred property, including religious or communal property, or the provision of comparable substitute property or the payment of equitable compensation to the rightful owner;
Why do you have a problem with this?
the use of the Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art and the Terezin Declaration in settling claims involving publicly and privately held movable property;
Why do you have a problem with this?
the restitution of heirless property to assist needy Holocaust survivors; and
I am going to sleep now. Read the book, we will talk about it later, but quick response about act.447.
The law isn't about giving property to the people or their heir it is about giving property that belong to the state, because heirless property don't belong to organisation's - it belongs to the state regardless of religion, ethnicity of said person.
But instead we need to pay money for the building's and property that were mostly destroyed by the Germans to the Jewish organisations just because the people that died were Jewish.
Why are we responsible for holocaust survivors?
And why we have to change the law to accommodate only one group of people while everybody else gets ignored and don't get the same privlidge?
Why Jews should have special laws and why should they be omitted from the our laws?
I am going to sleep now. Read the book, we will talk about it later, but quick response about act.447.
I am reading the book, but as I said - the person is making wild conclusions about things that don't really stand up to scrutiny. I've started to see why nobody has bothered writing out some in depth response to it. Because the things he's saying are questionable in the first place.
For example - he talks about Lindbergh and seems to be trying to paint a narrative in which this person was unfairly attacked. From what I've read so far, he's not pointed out that Lindbergh, from a historical perspective, was completely delusional.
Entering world war 2 was, in fact, in the interest of America, everyone in America, Jew or not. It was in the best interest of the world as a whole.
Hitler was engaged in a war of world conquest. He wasn't going to stop after Europe, not that letting him take Europe would be any more acceptable.
The law isn't about giving property to the people or their heir it is about giving property that belong to the state, because heirless property don't belong to organisation's - it belongs to the state regardless of religion, ethnicity of said person.
It's about giving stolen property back to the people it was stolen from in some form. The state, unlawfully, took these things from people. You don't seem to be capable of looking at this in a nuanced way.
I didn’t say that you fucking retard. Holy fuck way to take atrocious reading comprehension and run with it it so far you are pinging me to unrelated threads.
Your pings are the only ones that bother me tbh. I don’t Ben like it when I’m browsing and accidentally read your posts, much less be notified to one and have shoved in my inbox dry.
You read articles about mindfulness - you must take drugs
Man, how can I respect you when you are such a low IQ retard.
P.S. You really got triggered if you go through my posts just to try to respond to me and don't feel like such a little pathetic cuck 10 minutes after I stopped responding to your disgusting and sad whining :)
Comedy show subreddit. But also you must hate and fear Jews, and acknowledge that they are G-d's will made human, also they control all other people like cattle. Also Jews are scary and mean. Ironic comedy tho. We must stop Jews
If you want to start to suspect the actual (((truth))) Philip José Farmer's Strange Relations is dangerously close if you translate it through the 5 chosen languages back to english.
I'll read Culture of Critique if I ever suffer a severe frontal lobe injury that activates a masochism+autism kink
The book isn't attacking Jews. It is more of an explanation of Jewish behavior - first two books were praised by Jews. Third wasn't because it described intelectual and political movements that are hurtful to non-Jews because that''s a part of Jewish evolutionary strategy.
I am in the best tribe and apparently Jewess are aware of that - that''s why you all pray on Aryan men :P
I'll read culture of critique, if you read Franz Fanon's "Black skin, white masks". You might need to (have) read some Sartre, Heidegger and Kierkegaard to properly understand it though.
One book for one book. It wouldn't be very fair if I had to read 5 for you reading one.
I meant that there's a difference between reading a book and actually understanding what is being said and skimming a book quickly without grasping its concepts
Its philosophy, they build on ideas. Heidegger shouldn't be too bad for someone on the right-wing anyway. I'm not telling you to read the complete works of those authors just that their ideas are used in the book and a quick summary of them might help you understand it.
What is the deadline?
No deadline, I'm busy as fuck but I'll read some before going to sleep or on planes
125 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-06-01
I can take a 9-inch dildo up my butt, because I'm an adult and I solve my own problems
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Comments include people saying that Jews believe Jesus is boiling in cum
1 InspiringShitpost 2018-06-01
Boiled cum is a cocktail mixer around here.
1 GuillotinesNOW 2018-06-01
Literally my fetish.
1 556x44 2018-06-01
what even is this "Culture of Critique" book anyways, and why are they obsessed with it? asking for a friend
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
It is "An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements"
He talks about how some of those movements were created and influenced by Jews and how they served mostly Jewish interests. Examples are immigration, freud''s psychoanalysis, boas school of athropology, change in immigration laws, communism etc.
1 Matues49 2018-06-01
Yes, communism -especially in the forms it took under Stalin and Mao- helped serve... Jewish interests.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
You know that major Jews that pushed Stalin into position of power were Jewish?
And that first politiburo was majority Jewish?
And that both Lenin and Marx were of Jewish organ?
And that majority of leaders in communist-socialist revolution in Germany were Jewish?
But yeah, let''s pretend Jews weren't behind communism and spreading of communism
1 Matues49 2018-06-01
Did you know that the last politiburo was majority Slav?
And that both every USSR leader since Stalin was of Slavic organ?
And that the majority of leaders in post 1945 communist-socialist states in Eastern Europe were Slavs?
Really make you think.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Yeah, once they ruined eastern Europe they emigrated to US and pushed for creation of Israel where they murdered tens of thousands innocent Palestinians and displaced hundreds of thousands of people.
1 Matues49 2018-06-01
Yeah, them Joose and their Generalplan Ost really brought Easten Europe to its keens.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Yeah, keep lying to yourself little boy. One day you will believe that Jews weren't behind communism
1 Matues49 2018-06-01
Concession accepted.
1 AntifaSarqueefian 2018-06-01
You can't murder a Palestinian.
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-06-01
so it's the book version of that "the Jews did this" meme.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
People who have read "Culture of Critique" know what is inside :)
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-06-01
Is it mostly passive aggressive tautologies like that one?
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
haha, gay xD
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-06-01
It’s like an analog Ed
1 556x44 2018-06-01
thanks - my friend will appreciate this!
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
No problem brother :)
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-06-01
Oh weird how this other MDE homo showed up to support the book he never heard of and they both decided that they are maybe interested in some incel fanfic about how the jews made them failures.
1 556x44 2018-06-01
naaahhhh :)
I'm a superstar not a failure >:(
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-06-01
Neat.
1 SupaDupaFlyAccount 2018-06-01
So it's just a modern day version of the protocols of the elders of zion. Seems like a waste of time to read.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
No, the book is fantastic and it is so worth reading that people are reading it
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-06-01
You are literally retarded.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
My penis 3==========> ○ Your lips
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-06-01
shown at actual size
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Kiss it and make it bigger faggot
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-06-01
tempting but it looks like you're about maxed out there buddy
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Yesterday it got bigger in your lips - BTW. stop talking and get to work
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-06-01
I don't know what I love more, your butthurt downvoting or your """ironic""" raging homosexuality. Isn't you trying to get your dick sucked by dudes 24/7 exactly what the jews want?
1 Al_Shakir 2018-06-01
1 SupaDupaFlyAccount 2018-06-01
Yeah but the people reading it seem to be rural fentanyl users. Why would I want to read the same garbage that they read?
1 positiveandmultiple 2018-06-01
If this is how you try to convince people of radical pseudoscientific bullshit, no wonder you fell for it in the first place. Fuck off illiterate cuck.
1 GuillotinesNOW 2018-06-01
It's essentially the most up-to-date printing of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
No, it is literally not.
1 GuillotinesNOW 2018-06-01
I'm going to tell my Ashkenazi bull to run his giant uncut cock up into your wife's guts until he impregnates her with his superior chosen seed.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Giant 4 inch penis xD
1 Bot_Metric 2018-06-01
4.0 inch = 10.2 centimetres
I'm a bot. Downvote to 0 to delete this comment.
| Info | PM | Stats | Remove_from_this_subreddit Beta | Support_me |
1 556x44 2018-06-01
sounds big when you put it that way
1 Matues49 2018-06-01
Reevaluate your life.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Hów does my penis taste in your lips?
1 Matues49 2018-06-01
Are your parents looking for you somewhere?
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-06-01
Does this line work for you when you're hitting on your twelve year old niece?
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
No, but it does work on your girlfriend. She usually just go down on her knees as suck my Dick for 10-20 minutes straight and then drink my seen and go give you goodnight kiss.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-06-01
It's like reading erotica written by a virgin
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Yet, it is your and your gf''s life.
Bitch.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-06-01
Yeesh. You're not even good at shitposting.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Not as good at shit posting as your gf is at suckling my Dick and giving you goodnight kiss :)
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-06-01
Where are you from, retard? I can tell by your shit English, it's not anywhere civilized.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
I am in different places on different days, yesterday I was in your girlfriend, today I am in your mom.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-06-01
I'm guessing some sort of filthy Slav
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Did you assume it from the taste of my cum?
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-06-01
No, that doesn't even make sense.
I'm right about the dumb, filthy Slav thing, aren't I?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Pollack? Romanian?...Serb?
1 GuillotinesNOW 2018-06-01
You post things I normally only hear when I run across a 14 year old on a vidya voice chat.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Are you not embarrassed to play video games with 14 years olds. What type of bugman would even admit that.
1 GuillotinesNOW 2018-06-01
That's because all he does is agendapost against your people. He doesn't have practice with the bantz.
1 El_Guerito_Grande 2018-06-01
Sweetie, Jews are dick snippers.
1 GuillotinesNOW 2018-06-01
I feel like a tard. I don't know how I spaced on that.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-06-01
Ewwww, do I have to knock up his inbred shiksa?
1 El_Guerito_Grande 2018-06-01
The answer is yes USURIED.com.il
1 GuillotinesNOW 2018-06-01
We all must make sacrifices to eliminate the disgusting caucasian from the US.
Only 56% left to go!
1 ChaddingTater 2018-06-01
Can hobbits even be bulls? Is the bar really that low now?
Cucks these days...
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-06-01
Don't kinkshame guillotinesNOW
1 ChaddingTater 2018-06-01
How badly do you wish you were the superior sephardi Chad?
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-06-01
I guess being dumber can make life seem simple
1 ChaddingTater 2018-06-01
> Tfw I put all my character pounts into STR and CHR 😎💪
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-06-01
^ closet nerd confirmed
1 ChaddingTater 2018-06-01
🤓😇
Would you like this dreamy nerd to teach you the art of flap-slapping? Me and /u/subpoutine are doing some private tutoring but I can double up
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-06-01
This sounds like a trap
1 ChaddingTater 2018-06-01
Ye, the gut kind
1 pizzashill 2018-06-01
I mean, it is. It's exactly what the protocols were, except updated for modern times and hidden by a veil of pseudoscience.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
No, it's not. even Jews at r/Judaism were talking 4 days ago how a book is dangerous to them because no one really denied the arguments in the book and every response to the book was a strawman.
The conclusion was to get adl or someone else to disprove it.
But so far no one else did.
You don't believe me? Search post from last few days on r/Judaism by writing "culture of critique"
This book is really scientific with real claims taken from real academic literature - how can you even compare it to protocols?
I mean it is such a stupid claim that there is no way someone who have read it would compare both of those.
And if you haven't read it don't even respond - read it first and then I will happily talk about the book with you :)
1 pizzashill 2018-06-01
Stopped reading. Yes it is. Stop denying this shit, it's embarrassing. You're an internet neo-nazi reading Jewish conspiracy theories and pretending they're something else.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
How can you reject a work for being anti-semitic xD
Dude, you haven't read the book and those who criticised the book haven'the read it either. There was only one academic review of the book.
And even the jew admits that the review was strawmanny
HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHHAHAHAH xD
https://www.reddit.com/r/Judaism/comments/8mwabf/i_feel_the_need_to_expose_this_community_to_the/
1 pizzashill 2018-06-01
I like how you keep trying to invoke /r/judaism as if they're some authority on shit like this, it's hilarious.
Anyone making arguments about how "Jews control the government" is not a valid source of information. It's paranoid delusion. Nobody credible entertains this bullshit because it's not worth entertaining.
Literally the instant you see someone make in an argument like this they are to be dismissed. In the same way if someone walks up and claims there's a lizard base on the moon they are to be dismissed.
This right here reveals what you are. You're an internet neo-nazi. every bit as uneducated as the original, every bit as stupid as the original.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Where do I make such claim?
What if I said Jews control 5 our of 6 major social media platform.
Google, YouTube, reddit, Facebook, instagram
And what if Wikipedia says that I am right.
Should such claim be dismissed regardless of the fact that I am right?
5 out 6 social media's are run by Jews. Better?
Want to check out CEOS and owners of those social media's?
Prove me wrong honey? :)
Let's do a little experiment. You will read "Culture of Critique" and I will read any political/informational book you will choose. Karl Popper? Marx?
Are you open to a challenge?
1 pizzashill 2018-06-01
The books you're citing make this point.
I'd say you're a dumb person because a jew controlling a company doesn't mean the Jewish race controls them.
In the same way for example, a white Christian owning a media company doesn't mean the white race owns said media company.
That depends on the point you try to make. If you state the fact that Jews happen to be at the head of these companies, yes, that's a fact.
If you try to use that fact to then lend credibility to your delusions about Jewish world dominance, then yes, you are to be dismissed.
Ok, here's the book I want you to read:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/03/books/review/suspicious-minds-by-rob-brotherton.html
See above.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
No, literally book isn't about that
That's 100% not true. Media companies are run owner''s and manager/editor/whatever''s perspective.
Different owner/editor/ceo means reporting will be different and will promote different values and beliefs.
Strawman, adhominem and personal attacks. I think if we were to dismiss somebody claims we should start with your on the basis of them being very emotional and unprofessional.
Your book is about conspirations when my book is about ingroup preferances.
But okay, I will read yours and you will read mine. What's the deadline?
1 pizzashill 2018-06-01
The books make this point.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Is your book about in group preference and political and intelektual movements viewed from evolutionary perspective?
I doubt it.
http://www.angelfire.com/rebellion2/goyim/je1.pdf
When (doesn't have to be exact) do you plan to read it?
And just out of curiosity: Are you Jewish?
1 pizzashill 2018-06-01
My book is about how the brain works. The foibles found within the human brain, human story archetypes. The book is about why people like you believe the things you do, and why humans believe anything at all.
Sometime in the next 2 days probably, it's very light reading and I read a few books a week.
No.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Okay, I will for a link to your book or physical copy in library as soon as I will finish Evola ( I have 172 pages left) :)
1 pizzashill 2018-06-01
Uh, who does that. Just download it.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
I get books mostly from library or my bookstore - there was study about how you retain more information from physical books, but probably it won't be in my libraries so I will download ebook
1 pizzashill 2018-06-01
From what I've read in this book, which isn't that far, the guy seems to really miss the point as to why Jews tend to favor the policies they do.
When you look at the broad historical context, and the fact Jews have been the go to scapegoat in western Christian society for any number of disasters, even the black plague, most Jews believing the things they believe isn't shocking and it isn't evidence to support the views that are oh so common on MDE.
But I'll keep reading.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Exactly, it is their evolutionary strategy.
The book wasn't written by mde and the most radical claims are written by people who read Mein Kampf or are memeing, not the People who read "Culture of Critique"
I mean: Sam Hyde is Jewish comedian and he pushed for jokes that Jews support 6 thousand years old Talmud conspiracy to opress goyim.
But again - that's not what the book is about.
There is quite a big chance that you way agree with some claims in the book, the book is actually pretty objective
1 pizzashill 2018-06-01
But this isn't really correct. There's a difference between an evolutionary strategy unique to Jewish people and Jewish people, due to a history of oppression, being pushed in certain directions.
Black Americans for example. There's a reason why black people tend to be so common in various social justice movements. It isn't an evolutionary strategy, it's because of history.
Ethnic identity tends to be important to many people. It's why my mother, after learning her family was polish, dived right in and started talking about Slavic oppression. Believing that something unjust happened to her people changed the way she viewed the world.
This wasn't an evolutionary strategy.
In the case of Jews, take the example of Hollywood. Due to economic discrimination that was present across the entire western world for a number of years, Jews were primarily confined to certain occupations.
There's a book called "the movie moguls" that goes into more detail here, but this article goes over some of it:
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-in-hollywood-1930-1950/
This was not an evolutionary strategy but the natural conclusion of economic discrimination across the entire western world for a number of years.
You confine Jews to certain professions, and when economic liberalization started taking place, those professions they were confined to happened to be compatible with what was going on in Hollywood.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Yes and no. There are different processes that took place at the same time. Those are both genes, culture, situation etc.
Jews have also extremely high in group preference and it is quite common for Jews to say that the west needs open borders, diversity, multiculturalism but when asked about Israel they won't answer or say no.
They feel safe in multicultural societies because they learn that non-diverse societies tend to be less tolerant towards Jewish behaviour whether real or imaginary. That's also why tolerance became a thing in 20th century.
Before ithis word wasn't used as much and you didn't feel the need to be tolerant and suddenly 20th century the word is being used.
As for blacks - the reason why they in social justice movements is because Jews started those movement's and pushe'd blacks in.
The blacks didn't actually benefit from that. Their quality of life is even worse. Single motherhood is worse than in the sixties, youth unemployment too.
Civil rights movements were pushed by the Jews.
Feminism too BTW.
On Wikipedia there is 2 times more feminists that were Jewish than every type of feminists (by religion)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Feminists_by_religion
And atheists feminists are also in huge part Jewish.
Why?
Because conflict men - women and blacks - whites benefit them much more than a conflict Jews - goyim.
,+ of course in group preferance that makes them more likely to promote movements lead by Jews and that makes them more likely to accept college admissions from Jewish to be students
I am Polish and it would be easier for me to explain that in Polish if you speak Polish.
But if you don't I still have interestin fact that is related to polishness.
Have you heard about act.447?
It got voted in us parliament.
This act tells that Poles have to pay around 65 billion dollars to the Jewish organisations as a something we may call ww2 reparations.
Think about that.
Do you think it is fair?
1 LadyVetinari 2018-06-01
Dude, just convert. It's getting weird
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Wtf, why are you stalking me with those comments?
1 LadyVetinari 2018-06-01
All part of the (((plan)))
1 pizzashill 2018-06-01
Everyone has extremely high in group preference. It's called being a human. This is again, trying turn traits that are present in all humans into some uniquely Jewish trait.
And again, the same thing. Most people that aren't in the majority push for more diversity because less diverse societies are less tolerant towards any outsider or minority. This is a truth that is universal, yet somehow, it's being claimed a unique Jewish trait.
Can you think of any major events in the 20th century that might have caused something like this? I wonder what could have caused society as a whole to maybe realize archaic prejudice isn't good.
Lol? So now anyone that ever tries to fight for more civil rights and equality was in reality pushed there by the Jews. It isn't that some black people look at history, realized their people weren't treated so fairly, and maybe still aren't treated fairly, it's that the Jews made them do it.
Wait, to be clear here, you believe that black quality of life today is worse than it was before the civil rights movement? Because according to empirical data, you're wrong in every way possible. The quality of life for black Americans has improved across the board.
This is a claim so absurd, so detached from reality, I'm starting to suspect you aren't very informed on any of these subjects and are just repeating things you want to be true, because they justify an underlying prejudice.
Ok? The civil rights movement was an objectively good thing. You will not fine a single sane person claiming the civil rights movement wasn't good.
Again - early feminism was an objectively good thing. If there really is some Jewish plot, you aren't doing a very good job of explaining why this plot is bad.
"but they gave the blacks civil rights.'
"but they gave women civil rights."
What?
??
What in the fuck are you talking about? as in:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/447
This is what it does:
Why do you have a problem with this?
Why do you have a problem with this?
Why do you have a problem with this?
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
I am going to sleep now. Read the book, we will talk about it later, but quick response about act.447.
The law isn't about giving property to the people or their heir it is about giving property that belong to the state, because heirless property don't belong to organisation's - it belongs to the state regardless of religion, ethnicity of said person.
But instead we need to pay money for the building's and property that were mostly destroyed by the Germans to the Jewish organisations just because the people that died were Jewish.
Why are we responsible for holocaust survivors?
And why we have to change the law to accommodate only one group of people while everybody else gets ignored and don't get the same privlidge?
Why Jews should have special laws and why should they be omitted from the our laws?
1 pizzashill 2018-06-01
I am reading the book, but as I said - the person is making wild conclusions about things that don't really stand up to scrutiny. I've started to see why nobody has bothered writing out some in depth response to it. Because the things he's saying are questionable in the first place.
For example - he talks about Lindbergh and seems to be trying to paint a narrative in which this person was unfairly attacked. From what I've read so far, he's not pointed out that Lindbergh, from a historical perspective, was completely delusional.
Entering world war 2 was, in fact, in the interest of America, everyone in America, Jew or not. It was in the best interest of the world as a whole.
Hitler was engaged in a war of world conquest. He wasn't going to stop after Europe, not that letting him take Europe would be any more acceptable.
It's about giving stolen property back to the people it was stolen from in some form. The state, unlawfully, took these things from people. You don't seem to be capable of looking at this in a nuanced way.
http://thehill.com/opinion/international/364798-time-is-of-the-essence-for-holocaust-survivors
Most of these people will be dead soon. It's about correcting a wrong.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-06-01
Or as /u/LSU_Coonass would say, mdefags are merely pretending to be retarded 😂😂😂😂😂
1 LSU_Coonass 2018-06-01
I didn’t say that you fucking retard. Holy fuck way to take atrocious reading comprehension and run with it it so far you are pinging me to unrelated threads.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-06-01
Where do you think you're commenting? Is this not r/drama? Pings shouldn't bother you tbh 😂😂😂
1 LSU_Coonass 2018-06-01
Your pings are the only ones that bother me tbh. I don’t Ben like it when I’m browsing and accidentally read your posts, much less be notified to one and have shoved in my inbox dry.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-06-01
and that's a good thing! 😂😂😂😂😂😂
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-06-01
This was a mistake for you to say
1 LSU_Coonass 2018-06-01
I’m so used to being honest irl I was probably too naïve on the internet
1 Thulean-Dragon 2018-06-01
Lol, I don't even check my pings, I just let the notifications build up into the hundreds.
1 scatmunchies 2018-06-01
Nice use of the diaeresis.
1 LSU_Coonass 2018-06-01
Heh, diarrhea.
1 scatmunchies 2018-06-01
Do you work for this guy? You seem really dedicated to getting people to read his books, even asking how to shill in German (subtle, btw).
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
I like the book and we may even say that "Culture of Critique" is my highest passion in life.
I wake up - I think about Culture of Critique"
I tak shower - I think about Culture of Critique"
I eat breakfast - I think about Culture of Critique"
I go classes - I think about Culture of Critique"
I go to work - I think about Culture of Critique"
I meet up with my friends - I think about Culture of Critique"
I meet up with my gf - I think about Culture of Critique"
I have sex with my gf - I think about Culture of Critique"
I go to sleep - I think about Culture of Critique"
That''s my hobby, passion and even the meaning of my life :)
1 scatmunchies 2018-06-01
Gay and fake
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-06-01
Tell us more about your struggles with being a useless junkie and how hippie granola shit helps you
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Man, how can I respect you when you are such a low IQ retard.
P.S. You really got triggered if you go through my posts just to try to respond to me and don't feel like such a little pathetic cuck 10 minutes after I stopped responding to your disgusting and sad whining :)
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-06-01
Okay junkie 😉
1 LadyVetinari 2018-06-01
hahahah le ebic
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
You could read a book and thenjoy you would be smarter.
1 LadyVetinari 2018-06-01
Other than books about how Jews are better than you, what would you recommend?
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
You look scared, everything alright?
1 LadyVetinari 2018-06-01
Foiled again! Clever goy
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
My dear jewess. I think you are smart and open minded people. What would you say for a little book-reading challenge?
You will read the "Culture of Critique" and I will read political/academic/informational book of your choice? Marx? Karl Popper? Somebody else?
What do you think about such idea?
1 LadyVetinari 2018-06-01
Humanities books are for fags
Also lol you dont see the deeper (((design))) behind Culture of Critique, poor goy, so easily led astray
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Kikess please.
You are an adult (probably 25-35 yo person) and your nickname is literal reference to the discoworld. Don't come at with ad fagem argument :P
You can choose non-humanities book
1 LadyVetinari 2018-06-01
If you want to start to suspect the actual (((truth))) Philip José Farmer's Strange Relations is dangerously close if you translate it through the 5 chosen languages back to english.
I'll read Culture of Critique if I ever suffer a severe frontal lobe injury that activates a masochism+autism kink
I'm sorry you born in the wrong tribe 😢
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
The cover looks like degeneracy.
The book isn't attacking Jews. It is more of an explanation of Jewish behavior - first two books were praised by Jews. Third wasn't because it described intelectual and political movements that are hurtful to non-Jews because that''s a part of Jewish evolutionary strategy.
I am in the best tribe and apparently Jewess are aware of that - that''s why you all pray on Aryan men :P
https://www.reddit.com/r/CringeAnarchy/comments/7nlxfb/jewish_woman_with_a_high_iq_tries_to_hit_on_an/
1 LadyVetinari 2018-06-01
I'm not Jewish weirdo
1 LadyVetinari 2018-06-01
P.s. it's a hate crime to link me to a cringe anarchy thread. Reported.
1 JohnBlind 2018-06-01
I'll read culture of critique, if you read Franz Fanon's "Black skin, white masks". You might need to (have) read some Sartre, Heidegger and Kierkegaard to properly understand it though.
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
One book for one book. It wouldn't be very fair if I had to read 5 for you reading one.
But I can read that book.
What is the deadine?
1 JohnBlind 2018-06-01
I meant that there's a difference between reading a book and actually understanding what is being said and skimming a book quickly without grasping its concepts
Its philosophy, they build on ideas. Heidegger shouldn't be too bad for someone on the right-wing anyway. I'm not telling you to read the complete works of those authors just that their ideas are used in the book and a quick summary of them might help you understand it.
No deadline, I'm busy as fuck but I'll read some before going to sleep or on planes
1 ChadRight 2018-06-01
Okay, then when are you planning to read it?
It have around 600 pages, but is quite interesting read. I read it in 4-8 days I think
1 ardu- 2018-06-01
The Israel Lobby
The International Jew