I partly blame American movies. Shitty 80s productions like Revenge of the Nerds convinced those people that they deserved that thot gussy even if it was out of their league.
In general dudes shoot themselves in the foot when they value attractiveness so much they'll blind themselves to every other measurement of compatibility.
Eh, women are just now starting to bring more to the table than their bodies. Admittedly mostly because they literally weren't allowed to bring anything else before but you can't expect guys to change over night. And still no fat chicks.
It's pretty fucking weird. Then again, they probably just want to believe a fantasy.
Kind of feel sorry for the poor fucking bastards really. I mean...go to the gym. Work out. Eat well. It isn't exactly as if this information is kept secret or something.
It's chicks that pretend not to, and complain about being a "trophy wife" and unfulfilled later in the divorce like they didn't know what they were getting into from the jump.
The other problem is that the way divorce law works now, the contract doesnt work any more. Like you marry a chick, and you expect her to fuck you. That's the bargain. But now she gets to decide that it isn't working for her and leave, and then she takes half your shit with her.
I think that's happening more with the normalization of prenups but you can't really blame dudra who got married 20 years ago and the norm was that they'd stay together until she successfully killed him by cooking all his meals with a whole stick if butter.
My point is that if you married a girl who is hot but only into you for your money you are either a John who sucks at math or a full on retard. The guys that thought these women wouldnt be able to fuck them over because of social norms fall into the full on retard category.
Yeah those guys should have gotten a good prenup. These days you don't even need a relationship to have children as surrogates provide an opportunity for single men to have children outside a relationship.
Or just married someone who loved them for more than their money. That girl might not have been as hot though so instead they fucked up their whole lives for a status symbol.
I think pretty much the majority of dudes if given the choice between marriage and just staying bf/gf forever, would choose the latter. But eventually the girl gets antsy about "commitment" and society combines to guilt/shame you into "doing the right thing".
So either you get married and risk getting fucked later if she changes her mind, or you lose her and everyone calls you an irresponsible man-child who can't commit. Either way, not good.
Even if you marry someone on your income level, stuff changes. You have kids, both of you look at the price of daycare and figure out that it's cheaper for one of you (usually her) to stay home with the kids. Or she starts to feel the pinch of juggling that old "work-life" balance and decides to focus more on family.
It's kind of well known that women tend to prioritize family more than work. It's mostly a socialization thing, although the simple biology of pregnancy probably plays in a little. If one of you is gonna be medically sidelined for a few months, it's easier to stretch that into a couple of years.
And that's if we're talking equal pay. Beyond thay, you have to ask yourself who these ugly but stable beta dudes are attracting. "Strong female who don't need no man"? Naw, she's probably gonna wait for the dude who has everything; looks, money, charm, everything. So the uggos gotta get the ones who really NEED that husband who can pay for shit.
Yeah but you guys can't even get paternity tests without a court order "for the stability of French families". And if that's not a vote of no-confidence in the fidelity of French women, I don't know what is.
You can have one be done to establish or contest paternity.
It's not something that rando can do on their own, yes, because we consider that DNA is private, and thus the father (or not father) cannot use the DNA of the kid as he want.
It's more complex than that and depends on the state, but yeah that's the general rule.
Which is why everyone should get a pre-nup. Thats how you split the assets. If course, even then if you have a particularly sympathetic judge they can throw out the prenup. And guess who tends to get more "sympathy" in those situations?
The thing is, the system was designed the way it was back when most wives were housewives, and letting the husband just walk off meant having a broke ass homeless woman ending up on the welfare rolls. Literally that's in the decisions, that there is a societal benefit in not having broke people sucking up taxpayer money that their ex should be paying for.
Lol, if "here" is the UK, the law is the same there.
The takeway isn't that a pre-nup is worthless. It's that it, like any contract, has limits and woe betide the poor bastard who fucks up and writes a contract that isn't enforceable. Which, in the case of a pre-nup, tends to be intepreted as anything that fucks over the wife too much.
In most US states, a marriage acts like a partnership: everything you earn during the marriage is considered property of both partners. Such states are known as "community property" states.
The other problem is that the way divorce law works now, the contract doesnt work any more. Like you marry a chick, and you expect her to fuck you. That's the bargain. But now she gets to decide that it isn't working for her and leave, and then she takes half your shit with her.
This just in, men like slender women with big tits and asses. Men outraged that fatties and flat chests might find out and... oh wait, men work to support themselves.
Itโs kinda dumb because itโs not like any woman thinks to herself โthis guy is pretty stable and seems like long term relationship material... but heโs tall and handsome so NOPE!โ
Surprise! Science proves people want stable qualities in a long term partner. If someoneโs not โwokeโ to that โproblemโ already, they should really be pissed at themselves.
What bugs is me is people throwing around "AFBB" all the time like it's some revelation. Like, no shit some dude who lets himself get walked on is getting cleared out. It's funny that they use that mentality against women when the same "beta" dudes are probably fucked over just as hard by other dudes.
I believe he is referring to the fact that in France it is illegal for a man to get a paternity test without a court order. Subject to a year in prison and โฌ15,000 fine.
ARTICLE 226-25
(Act no. 1992-1336 of 16 December 1992 Articles 361 and 373 Official Journal of 23 December 1992 into force 1 March 1994; Act no. 1994-653 of 29 July 1994 Article 8 Official Journal of 30 July 1994; Ordinance No. 2000-916 of 19 September 2000 Article 3 Official Journal of 22 September into force 1 January 2002; Act no.2004-801 of 6 August 2004 Article 14 Official Journal of 7 August 2004)
The study of the genetic characteristics of a person for purposes other medical purposes or scientific research, or their study for medical purposes or scientific research without having obtained the person's prior consent pursuant to the conditions set out under article 16-10 of the Civil Code, is punished by one year's imprisonment and a fine of โฌ15,000.
I believe he is referring to the fact that in France it is illegal for a man to get a paternity test without a court order in order to preserve the peace within French families.
What? The law just states that you can't make someone take a DNA test without consent or a court order.
Is it legal to subject someone to a DNA test without consent in the states?
So in the states you can just take your kid and do a DNA test without the mother knowing? In civil law countries you actually have to dispute the paternity in court and then get your DNA test
So in the states you can just take your kid and do a DNA test without the mother knowing?
Yes (it has to be court-ordered to stand up in a court of law though), if you do it in France you can get up to a year in prison and a fine of โฌ15,000.
I thought it was a crime in the states too. You have the right to have ownership of your body so no one can test your shit without consent, not even a child. If you go to court you'll get it anyway but you can't just do it willy nilly
They probably have teams of moderators specialized in various STEM branches. They still have to figure out wether a biology, psychology or cosmology post is accurate or not: when you consider that 1500 is a reasonable number.
I'm pretty sure they don't moderate every single comment individually. Something that's pretty common on reddit is posting personal anecdotes (and memey responses) that are related to the OP in the comments. That's against the rules on /r/science, but most commenters don't bother reading the rules. These comments then get replies, and the moderators nuke the anecdote and the entire comment chain that stemmed from it. That's why you always see entire comment chains nuked there.
There is also the risk of splinters from wielding them. Mammoth tusks, on the other hand, are smooth and splinter-free and have an ergonomic grip that is pleasing to hold in your hand.
Can we stop accusing our ancestors of rape? Ancient women were down to fuck so much so that they evolved to be loud during sex to attract other males to fight thwir current mate and let the winner finish.
Whom'st'd've thonk that someone getting into a long term partnership would prefer financial stability over physical characteristics (which decline in quality over time) ๐ค
Definitely a HARD TO SWALLOW ๐ฉ blackpill for the betafag normies reading this.
I want to see a study which shows the correlation of media consumption (video games, anime, porn, etc) versus the amount of bussy they get. I wonder if there is a surprising conclusion on that study.
Also I like how no one gives a shit about starting a family. Guess why America and Canada is outsourcing it's baby making the third world. The mayocide chemicals placed in the Tap Water have worked.
Shared interests and goals work better in a business relationship. But social attraction is also essential if you want long term relationship along with it.
Besides, its already a known saying to don't do business with friends and family so you have to put that into consideration.
133 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-06-04
No wonder you have an army of pretentious neckbeard losers following you around
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 TheSolarian 2018-06-04
Science confirms alpha fucks, beta bucks.
Precisely no one surprised, thots outraged that the beta bucks might wake up to the problem.
1 Kahina91 2018-06-04
It's only a problem if you're not getting any
1 TheSolarian 2018-06-04
Plenty of thots out there who fuck up the beta buck angle, definitely.
1 siskonaut 2018-06-04
This pretty much happens to guys who get women out of their league by means other than seduction. In their case, what the fuck did they expect?
1 YameteOniichanItai 2018-06-04
I partly blame American movies. Shitty 80s productions like Revenge of the Nerds convinced those people that they deserved that thot gussy even if it was out of their league.
1 siskonaut 2018-06-04
In general dudes shoot themselves in the foot when they value attractiveness so much they'll blind themselves to every other measurement of compatibility.
1 aqouta 2018-06-04
Eh, women are just now starting to bring more to the table than their bodies. Admittedly mostly because they literally weren't allowed to bring anything else before but you can't expect guys to change over night. And still no fat chicks.
1 Scopejack 2018-06-04
In defence of Revenge of the Nerds the nerd in question did have to rape the girl before she saw his inner beauty.
1 menvaren 2018-06-04
16 Candles as well.
1 TheSolarian 2018-06-04
It's pretty fucking weird. Then again, they probably just want to believe a fantasy.
Kind of feel sorry for the poor fucking bastards really. I mean...go to the gym. Work out. Eat well. It isn't exactly as if this information is kept secret or something.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-06-04
Naw, dudes know what's up.
It's chicks that pretend not to, and complain about being a "trophy wife" and unfulfilled later in the divorce like they didn't know what they were getting into from the jump.
The other problem is that the way divorce law works now, the contract doesnt work any more. Like you marry a chick, and you expect her to fuck you. That's the bargain. But now she gets to decide that it isn't working for her and leave, and then she takes half your shit with her.
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-06-04
If these rich uggo dudes actually do know what's up then they should either stop signing that contact or stop bitching about it later.
1 aqouta 2018-06-04
I think that's happening more with the normalization of prenups but you can't really blame dudra who got married 20 years ago and the norm was that they'd stay together until she successfully killed him by cooking all his meals with a whole stick if butter.
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-06-04
My point is that if you married a girl who is hot but only into you for your money you are either a John who sucks at math or a full on retard. The guys that thought these women wouldnt be able to fuck them over because of social norms fall into the full on retard category.
1 ChromeGhost 2018-06-04
Yeah those guys should have gotten a good prenup. These days you don't even need a relationship to have children as surrogates provide an opportunity for single men to have children outside a relationship.
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-06-04
Or just married someone who loved them for more than their money. That girl might not have been as hot though so instead they fucked up their whole lives for a status symbol.
1 ChromeGhost 2018-06-04
You say that as if humans wonโt continue to behave vapid and foolishly.
1 SuitableHippo999 2018-06-04
Even uggos don't love uggos. It's just that they don't have any other option.
1 menvaren 2018-06-04
There is no other way to cook meals you Philistine.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-06-04
It's damned if you, damned if you don't.
I think pretty much the majority of dudes if given the choice between marriage and just staying bf/gf forever, would choose the latter. But eventually the girl gets antsy about "commitment" and society combines to guilt/shame you into "doing the right thing".
So either you get married and risk getting fucked later if she changes her mind, or you lose her and everyone calls you an irresponsible man-child who can't commit. Either way, not good.
1 JamesRobotoMD 2018-06-04
Why is everyone marrying these broke ass bitches?
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-06-04
Even if you marry someone on your income level, stuff changes. You have kids, both of you look at the price of daycare and figure out that it's cheaper for one of you (usually her) to stay home with the kids. Or she starts to feel the pinch of juggling that old "work-life" balance and decides to focus more on family.
It's kind of well known that women tend to prioritize family more than work. It's mostly a socialization thing, although the simple biology of pregnancy probably plays in a little. If one of you is gonna be medically sidelined for a few months, it's easier to stretch that into a couple of years.
And that's if we're talking equal pay. Beyond thay, you have to ask yourself who these ugly but stable beta dudes are attracting. "Strong female who don't need no man"? Naw, she's probably gonna wait for the dude who has everything; looks, money, charm, everything. So the uggos gotta get the ones who really NEED that husband who can pay for shit.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-06-04
Burgers don't have separated money, like here ?
You are forced to put everything into the marriage ? Wtf.
1 SlowFatHusky 2018-06-04
Most marriage assets will be considered in a divorce. Even some assets you brought to the marriage prior (like a trust fund) may end up being divided.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-06-04
Pre nup are binding here in the superior democratic people commune of France.
1 parduscat 2018-06-04
Yeah but you guys can't even get paternity tests without a court order "for the stability of French families". And if that's not a vote of no-confidence in the fidelity of French women, I don't know what is.
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2018-06-04
TBF 100% of the population will probably fail it.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-06-04
You can have one be done to establish or contest paternity.
It's not something that rando can do on their own, yes, because we consider that DNA is private, and thus the father (or not father) cannot use the DNA of the kid as he want.
1 parduscat 2018-06-04
Why else would a man want the DNA of the kids he's caring for except to establish paternity?
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-06-04
Kinda beside the point, but one could imagine a racist refusing to take care of his kids because he has slavs genes for exemple.
1 parduscat 2018-06-04
So if I'm in France and a woman claims a kid is mine but I've got doubts, how hard is it for me to get a paternity test.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-06-04
Pretty easy. You just refuse and it goes to the judge that will give the order to have it done.
1 Leftist_Degenerate 2018-06-04
What is racist about that?
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-06-04
Careful to not cut yourself on your edge kiddo.
1 imaginarycreatures 2018-06-04
Mad science experiments come to mind, but I have to imagine that's a fairly small demographic.
1 Bluest_waters 2018-06-04
homebrew genetic experiments!
duh!
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2018-06-04
peoplefrog commune1 Leftist_Degenerate 2018-06-04
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-06-04
Don't make me dream, bby
1 Leftist_Degenerate 2018-06-04
Dream of a nuclear rocket called "Charles Martel".
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-06-04
>Jeanne au seeeeeeecooouuuuuuuuuuurs.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-06-04
It's more complex than that and depends on the state, but yeah that's the general rule.
Which is why everyone should get a pre-nup. Thats how you split the assets. If course, even then if you have a particularly sympathetic judge they can throw out the prenup. And guess who tends to get more "sympathy" in those situations?
The thing is, the system was designed the way it was back when most wives were housewives, and letting the husband just walk off meant having a broke ass homeless woman ending up on the welfare rolls. Literally that's in the decisions, that there is a societal benefit in not having broke people sucking up taxpayer money that their ex should be paying for.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-06-04
It's weird, here the pre nup are a legal binding agreement.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-06-04
Yes, and like any legally binding contract it has to be upheld by a court.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-06-04
Yeah, it's the case here. Weird af that it isn't the case in burger land.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-06-04
Lol, if "here" is the UK, the law is the same there.
The takeway isn't that a pre-nup is worthless. It's that it, like any contract, has limits and woe betide the poor bastard who fucks up and writes a contract that isn't enforceable. Which, in the case of a pre-nup, tends to be intepreted as anything that fucks over the wife too much.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-06-04
Tea drinkers laws are bullshit and not followed ? Another way in wich, us the gay mimes are superior.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-06-04
Yeah, French law on pre-nups is much stronger than UK law.
1 TrueBlue98 2018-06-04
Thatโs not true but okay mate
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-06-04
Which part isn't true?
1 Leftist_Degenerate 2018-06-04
In most US states, a marriage acts like a partnership: everything you earn during the marriage is considered property of both partners. Such states are known as "community property" states.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-06-04
Uh. Weird. It need to be put in common here.
1 Leftist_Degenerate 2018-06-04
Wow, you can't even manage to be communist with your own family. Sad.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-06-04
The glorious united communities of the french Anarchy are not commie, unlike the much inferior burgerland, indeed.
1 XhotwheelsloverX 2018-06-04
What is a prenup
1 Nopepole 2018-06-04
๐ญ That's why I'm gonna keep cummin' in my onahole.
1 shallowm 2018-06-04
What is the answer to the Femoid Question?
It might be /r/MGTOWWOM, but I'm not sure.
1 TheSolarian 2018-06-04
Woo. That's some next tier degeneracy.
1 OniTan 2018-06-04
This just in, men like slender women with big tits and asses. Men outraged that fatties and flat chests might find out and... oh wait, men work to support themselves.
1 TheSolarian 2018-06-04
Boom tish.
1 Orsonius 2018-06-04
don't shame best chests
1 sevp 2018-06-04
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-06-04
Pedo or chestlet?
1 Orsonius 2018-06-04
what is a chestlet?
Im a dude btw. DFC is love and life
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-06-04
A member of the itty bitty titty committee. Since you're just a dude that likes flat chests though, we can just assume you're a kiddy diddler.
1 -absolutego- 2018-06-04
paging /u/YameteOniichanItai
1 YameteOniichanItai 2018-06-04
he's right, you know. small and cute, stay to lewd. plump and big, drop that chick.
1 SoSaltyDoe 2018-06-04
Itโs kinda dumb because itโs not like any woman thinks to herself โthis guy is pretty stable and seems like long term relationship material... but heโs tall and handsome so NOPE!โ
Surprise! Science proves people want stable qualities in a long term partner. If someoneโs not โwokeโ to that โproblemโ already, they should really be pissed at themselves.
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-06-04
obvious things are obvious, but with SCIENCE!
1 SoSaltyDoe 2018-06-04
What bugs is me is people throwing around "AFBB" all the time like it's some revelation. Like, no shit some dude who lets himself get walked on is getting cleared out. It's funny that they use that mentality against women when the same "beta" dudes are probably fucked over just as hard by other dudes.
1 heavenlytoaster 2018-06-04
Yeah but what kind of catchphrase is "alphas alpha betas beta"
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-06-04
how about RDAA?
as in "r/drama autistic alone"
1 LadyVetinari 2018-06-04
What's the problem?
1 TheSolarian 2018-06-04
Thots will crai.
1 siskonaut 2018-06-04
I like how this is somehow controversial.
1 butwomenarejustpeopl 2018-06-04
So surprising. Like cuckolding being legal in France.
1 Etsuko1 2018-06-04
Wut? Is it illegal in other countries?
1 ffbtaw 2018-06-04
I believe he is referring to the fact that in France it is illegal for a man to get a paternity test without a court order. Subject to a year in prison and โฌ15,000 fine.
ARTICLE 226-25
(Act no. 1992-1336 of 16 December 1992 Articles 361 and 373 Official Journal of 23 December 1992 into force 1 March 1994; Act no. 1994-653 of 29 July 1994 Article 8 Official Journal of 30 July 1994; Ordinance No. 2000-916 of 19 September 2000 Article 3 Official Journal of 22 September into force 1 January 2002; Act no.2004-801 of 6 August 2004 Article 14 Official Journal of 7 August 2004)
The study of the genetic characteristics of a person for purposes other medical purposes or scientific research, or their study for medical purposes or scientific research without having obtained the person's prior consent pursuant to the conditions set out under article 16-10 of the Civil Code, is punished by one year's imprisonment and a fine of โฌ15,000.
1 Etsuko1 2018-06-04
What? The law just states that you can't make someone take a DNA test without consent or a court order. Is it legal to subject someone to a DNA test without consent in the states?
1 ffbtaw 2018-06-04
Your own child? Yes.
1 Etsuko1 2018-06-04
So in the states you can just take your kid and do a DNA test without the mother knowing? In civil law countries you actually have to dispute the paternity in court and then get your DNA test
1 ffbtaw 2018-06-04
Yes (it has to be court-ordered to stand up in a court of law though), if you do it in France you can get up to a year in prison and a fine of โฌ15,000.
1 Etsuko1 2018-06-04
I thought it was a crime in the states too. You have the right to have ownership of your body so no one can test your shit without consent, not even a child. If you go to court you'll get it anyway but you can't just do it willy nilly
1 ffbtaw 2018-06-04
Seeing as chopping off foreskins is a-ok it's pretty clear the US doesn't care much for the bodily autonomy of babies.
1 Leftist_Degenerate 2018-06-04
Actually, you have to get the baby's consent before changing its diaper.
1 ffbtaw 2018-06-04
That's only in Australia.
1 shallowm 2018-06-04
/r/science nuking the comments isn't a new thing, it happens to pretty much every submission that garners a decent amount of comments.
1 Santata 2018-06-04
That sub has like 1500 moderators, like how the fuck? Do you need a moderator for every comment?
1 PierligBouloven 2018-06-04
They probably have teams of moderators specialized in various STEM branches. They still have to figure out wether a biology, psychology or cosmology post is accurate or not: when you consider that 1500 is a reasonable number.
1 carthoris26 2018-06-04
Except that's not why they remove the overwhelming majority of comments, it's always politically minded. Exhibit A: this post.
1 shallowm 2018-06-04
I'm pretty sure they don't moderate every single comment individually. Something that's pretty common on reddit is posting personal anecdotes (and memey responses) that are related to the OP in the comments. That's against the rules on /r/science, but most commenters don't bother reading the rules. These comments then get replies, and the moderators nuke the anecdote and the entire comment chain that stemmed from it. That's why you always see entire comment chains nuked there.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-06-04
Now, if someone would repost this to menslib....
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-06-04
And TrollX
1 LadyVetinari 2018-06-04
It has a lot of gif potential tbh
1 Ultrashitposter 2018-06-04
reeeeeeeeeeeee biotruths biotruths!!!!!
1 nomad1c 2018-06-04
this isn't even the first study to say this. they all say the same thing
it's weird that people have trouble accepting it when you can see it for your own eyes
1 Destirigon 2018-06-04
Study confirms what literally everyone knew since, uh.... the Stone Ages I guess? The guy with the most mammoth tusks got the girls.
1 _rs 2018-06-04
Thatโs because you use the tusks to knock them down and drag them to your cave, true, true...
1 Destirigon 2018-06-04
It's true. Mammoth tusks are 300% more efficient at knocking down the neighbour clan's females than wooden clubs. Mythbusters did an episode on that.
1 _rs 2018-06-04
Wooden clubs are not that smooth and can cut skin, yes, you donโt them to leave long term marks!
1 Destirigon 2018-06-04
There is also the risk of splinters from wielding them. Mammoth tusks, on the other hand, are smooth and splinter-free and have an ergonomic grip that is pleasing to hold in your hand.
1 aqouta 2018-06-04
Can we stop accusing our ancestors of rape? Ancient women were down to fuck so much so that they evolved to be loud during sex to attract other males to fight thwir current mate and let the winner finish.
Chads didn't need to incapacitate women.
1 I_FART_OUT_MY_BUTT69 2018-06-04
are you calling my grandma a slut you fucking bitch?
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2018-06-04
They still need the tusks to konk the males then.
1 retrend 2018-06-04
The saddest thing about it now most of the comments are deleted is the incels asking, what does 'warm' in this context mean.
1 wwyzzerdd 2018-06-04
I'm not dead yet!
1 glasscarpet 2018-06-04
If you dumb shits ever wonder why you are labelled as 'right wing', refer to this post.
1 EternallyMiffed 2018-06-04
1 boyoyoyoyong 2018-06-04
Noticing things is politically incorrect
1 EternallyMiffed 2018-06-04
Political correctness is indeed a war on noticing things. Pure coincidences, if you will.
1 Nopepole 2018-06-04
KEEP YO EYES CLOSED SHITLORD
1 saint2e 2018-06-04
Reality has a right wing slant.
1 SoSaltyDoe 2018-06-04
Sure. But using the term โalpha fucks beta cucksโ unironically puts you in that camp.
1 LadyVetinari 2018-06-04
You sound like a beta
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-06-04
more like an omega. you know, fetal alcohol drip to ensure lowered intelligence for working in the salt mines.
1 dongas420 2018-06-04
I really miss those days when the act of posting study results from respected scientific journals meant you had a left-wing bias.
1 Fletch71011 2018-06-04
Agreeing with a non-controversial, peer-reviewed study is right-wing now? I thought reality had a liberal bias?
1 ragnathorn 2018-06-04
Literally a link to someone else's post
1 aqouta 2018-06-04
No u.
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-06-04
you suck at shitposting
1 shallowm 2018-06-04
being woke about femoids isn't "right wing"
1 ssclanker 2018-06-04
Lmaoo they literally deleted a comment talking about the deleted comments and the good work the mods were doing.
1 boyoyoyoyong 2018-06-04
The best thing is this level of thotery is tax payer funded
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-06-04
Whom'st'd've thonk that someone getting into a long term partnership would prefer financial stability over physical characteristics (which decline in quality over time) ๐ค
Definitely a HARD TO SWALLOW ๐ฉ blackpill for the betafag normies reading this.
1 TheFallenHero 2018-06-04
Shut up cuck
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-06-04
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
1 sevp 2018-06-04
๐ด๐ด๐ด
1 Nopepole 2018-06-04
I'd take a hot thot over a hot meal any day if the week.
Your body will only go to shit if you let it, or you're a mayo.
1 Chicup 2018-06-04
Why not both?
As a degenerate myself it's rather obvious that women look at boytoys differently than LTR.
It's not even the beta thing in most cases, it's different criteria.
1 Thulean-Dragon 2018-06-04
Lmao, we needed a 'study' to show this?
Funny how much basic human behavior suddenly became "problematic" and had to be re-proven by actual experts.
1 Orsonius 2018-06-04
Advocating for post scarcity economy too weed out sugar daddies
Advocating for genetic engineering of babies to eradicate manlets
what will women do if men are all equally physically attractive and money no longer exists?
will they WGTOW?
1 broden 2018-06-04
heh....nice one kid....
1 Gtyyler 2018-06-04
I want to see a study which shows the correlation of media consumption (video games, anime, porn, etc) versus the amount of bussy they get. I wonder if there is a surprising conclusion on that study.
Also I like how no one gives a shit about starting a family. Guess why America and Canada is outsourcing it's baby making the third world. The mayocide chemicals placed in the Tap Water have worked.
1 hlary 2018-06-04
What about shared interests and goals?
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-06-04
Hah!
1 Leftist_Degenerate 2018-06-04
There aren't any, unless you marry a bi slut.
1 hlary 2018-06-04
thats wrong on multiple accounts your honor
1 tritter211 2018-06-04
Shared interests and goals work better in a business relationship. But social attraction is also essential if you want long term relationship along with it.
Besides, its already a known saying to don't do business with friends and family so you have to put that into consideration.
1 Anarcho_Autism 2018-06-04
Lol no shit. Most stable, agreeable dudes get the impulsive narcissist's leftovers. Everyone knows this.
1 movielover2018 2018-06-04
What a surprise!
1 Pastelitomaracucho 2018-06-04
Red pilled confirmed