It having liberal in the name does not mean its liberalism as commonly understood in America; classical liberalism is a synonym for libertarianism, which it is ideologically the same as.
He's not stupid. It's the opposite, he's really, really, really, smart.
He knows his audience is basically rightwingers with massive egos only at this point and tries to pander them to them as hard as possible for dem patreon shekels.
By being basically right wing while pretending to be a centrist, he grants moral superiority and free ego boost to himself and his audience, by letting them think that "We're compromising, intellectuals, we see the best of both", without actually challenging them on anything and risking losing his fame and money.
Basically, he makes them feel special so they flock around him.
That's exactly why he took it. A rightwinger following a centrist feels like they're enlightened and above the mold, like they are smarter and they can compromise.
He gives his audience smart boy points by labeling himself a centrist instead of a rightwinger because that they he can pretend to be above it all.
It's the classic "Both sides are bad, but the most important thing is I found a way to be superior to both."
He's a criminal mastermind, just like in Harry Potter when Emperor Voldemort tricks all the little Hufflepuffs into believing his lies about the Elves.
A lot of right-wingers like to pretend they're centrist or "classical liberal."
I once had a guy tell me he was a "real liberal" unlike me, he was a "classical liberal" as he argued in favor of protectionism and pushed right-wing conspiracies.
Classical liberalism isn't really related to liberalism in its modern political context; its like thinking libertarians are liberals because they sound similar.
the definition of the word liberal is someone who believes in individual rights, limited government, and free market economics (which includes private property). This describes both libertarians and liberals in the colloquial sense of the word (at least in America). The only differnce between liberals and libertarians is how free they think the market should be.
In America specifically "liberal" refers to people who want all the free shit like in socialism, but they also want all the degeneracy that socialism usually forbids.
stuff that feels good while you do it, but harms you (in ways you may only realize much later. Or maybe never, because you don't know what you're missing.)
"A Good Time"
a good night of drinking, and a hangover
a good few weeks dating deadbeat Tyrone, and 20 years single motherhood.
a good month of crack, and a lifetime of addiction.
ten years on the cock carousel, your remaining years bitter and sad.
twenty years wasted playing video games / redditing instead of learning anything useful, and a shit life in all other aspects
Yes I've heard all about what you guys are against, but very little of what you're actually for. By all means tell me more about your Leave it to Beaver fantasy of a bygone America that never actually existed
Didn't escape my notice that when you're talking about DEGENERACY you have a bunch of specific examples but when you talk abut what you're for its a bunch of vague, almost worthless platitudes.
You do realize that from her perspective some hardcore feminist SJW type could consider herself as ticking off every one of those boxes so long as she ended up with a long term boyfriend and children right?
some hardcore feminist SJW type could consider herself as ticking off every one of those boxes so long as she ended up with a long term boyfriend and children right?
"Um, you see I don't know, I don't have a position on climate change, I haven't done enough research, well obviously non-mandmade climate change is a thing, but is there enough research to say on made? I just don't know why climate changes. It's a very complicated and very hard subject that requires a lot of research, I haven't studied it so I just can't know, I don't know why it's happening, I could potentially believe that it's humans, but it's very big and I don't know, it's just too hard, and I see things from both sides, you see it's hard, and I'm not a scientist."
It gives him a reason to say something in a hour that he could just as easily say in 5 minutes. Which, I assume, leads to more YouTube bucks. Though I'm not sure if he's still monetized.
If he said that I guess you could call him right wing. Was the US a right wing country in the 1800's? Most people would say the early US embodies liberalism. IMO rightwing is fascism.
The US was conservative by our standards, although not by those of its time. Tbh your views are the result of trying to categorize police by a single-axis scale instead of viewing economic and sociopolitical views as separate.
"Um, you see I don't know, I haven't done enough research, well obviously non-mandmade climate change is a thing, but is there enough research to say on made? I just don't know why climate changes. It's a very complicated and very hard subject that requires a lot of research, I haven't studied it so I just can't know, I don't know why it's happening, I could potentially believe that it's humans, but it's very big and I don't know, it's just too hard, and I see things from both sides, you see it's hard, and I'm not a scientist."
On a scale of 0-10, where 0 is Hutu anger in 1994 Rwanda and 10 is absolutely devoted love, anyone who is outside a 4-6 when it comes to their feelings on Sargon should be ground into dust and spread over topsoil.
67 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-06-07
This is why we need mayocide.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 normie_girl 2018-06-07
Yep.
1 normie_girl 2018-06-07
Zoom admits to the crime: 8:20
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-06-07
😴😴😴
1 normie_girl 2018-06-07
wrong
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-06-07
Can't spell Incel without u
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
What id on't udnerstand is why Sargon pretends to eb centrist while mostlya greeing with conservatists/alt-right.
1 fraustnaut 2018-06-07
He's really, really, really, really, really, stupid.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
Classical liberalism is literally just libertarianism for pseudointellectuals.
1 Daxx46 2018-06-07
You're in a safe space. You can call them retards here.
1 modsarethebest 2018-06-07
it's really just liberalism.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
It having liberal in the name does not mean its liberalism as commonly understood in America; classical liberalism is a synonym for libertarianism, which it is ideologically the same as.
1 modsarethebest 2018-06-07
How liberalism in America changed meaning is ridiculous.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
That's like calling people gay and then saying it has an older feaning lol.
1 modsarethebest 2018-06-07
In 90% of the world this is still the meaning of liberalism, Liberalismus, libéralisme,...
it's really only the US, where liberalism means "socialism + degeneracy".
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
Lol where do you think these idiots live?
Nice job using examples from different languages and areas.
It doesn't matter if fag means a different thing in Britain if I'm an American calling Americans fags.
1 modsarethebest 2018-06-07
sargon is British, the other guy is French AFAIK
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
Amend that to what audience do you think these people are speaking to.
1 modsarethebest 2018-06-07
world audience
America should just adapt to the way the rest of the world uses the word.
1 0192837465-TK1 2018-06-07
French Canadian.
1 broden 2018-06-07
Basque French Canadian.
1 Crusader_1096 2018-06-07
Are you retarded or do you always opine on things you know nothing about?
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
No u.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
That's like calling people gay and then saying it has an older meaning lol; technically correct but you're being misleading.
1 0192837465-TK1 2018-06-07
He's not stupid. It's the opposite, he's really, really, really, smart.
He knows his audience is basically rightwingers with massive egos only at this point and tries to pander them to them as hard as possible for dem patreon shekels.
By being basically right wing while pretending to be a centrist, he grants moral superiority and free ego boost to himself and his audience, by letting them think that "We're compromising, intellectuals, we see the best of both", without actually challenging them on anything and risking losing his fame and money.
Basically, he makes them feel special so they flock around him.
1 DepletedMitochondria 2018-06-07
"Centrist" is definitely one of those labels I've heard people take to sound smarter though
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
Yep; people see how smart centrism is and try to imitate it.
1 0192837465-TK1 2018-06-07
That's exactly why he took it. A rightwinger following a centrist feels like they're enlightened and above the mold, like they are smarter and they can compromise.
He gives his audience smart boy points by labeling himself a centrist instead of a rightwinger because that they he can pretend to be above it all.
It's the classic "Both sides are bad, but the most important thing is I found a way to be superior to both."
1 modsarethebest 2018-06-07
He's a criminal mastermind, just like in Harry Potter when Emperor Voldemort tricks all the little Hufflepuffs into believing his lies about the Elves.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
Feminists rekt.
1 pizzashill 2018-06-07
A lot of right-wingers like to pretend they're centrist or "classical liberal."
I once had a guy tell me he was a "real liberal" unlike me, he was a "classical liberal" as he argued in favor of protectionism and pushed right-wing conspiracies.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
Classical liberalism isn't really related to liberalism in its modern political context; its like thinking libertarians are liberals because they sound similar.
1 pizzashill 2018-06-07
No shit, they don't know what it is. It's just a fancy way of saying right-wing libertarian that doesn't actually hold libertarian views.
1 spookyguy109 2018-06-07
libertarians are liberals, technically.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
In the context of American politics, liberal is a general term for anyone who's economically and politically center-left.
1 spookyguy109 2018-06-07
the definition of the word liberal is someone who believes in individual rights, limited government, and free market economics (which includes private property). This describes both libertarians and liberals in the colloquial sense of the word (at least in America). The only differnce between liberals and libertarians is how free they think the market should be.
1 modsarethebest 2018-06-07
In America specifically "liberal" refers to people who want all the free shit like in socialism, but they also want all the degeneracy that socialism usually forbids.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
No, in America liberal refers to center-left political parties.
1 modsarethebest 2018-06-07
what do they campaign on? why do people vote for them?
free shit
degeneracy
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
Lol CringeAnarchy poster calling someone else a degenerate.
1 modsarethebest 2018-06-07
did I really write a comment in cringeanarchy once? omg how embarrassing!
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
Lol you're a regular user there.
1 modsarethebest 2018-06-07
where else did I post?
1 Plexipus 2018-06-07
Degeneracy, AKA "A Good Time"
1 modsarethebest 2018-06-07
stuff that feels good while you do it, but harms you (in ways you may only realize much later. Or maybe never, because you don't know what you're missing.)
a good night of drinking, and a hangover
a good few weeks dating deadbeat Tyrone, and 20 years single motherhood.
a good month of crack, and a lifetime of addiction.
ten years on the cock carousel, your remaining years bitter and sad.
twenty years wasted playing video games / redditing instead of learning anything useful, and a shit life in all other aspects
1 Plexipus 2018-06-07
Yes I've heard all about what you guys are against, but very little of what you're actually for. By all means tell me more about your Leave it to Beaver fantasy of a bygone America that never actually existed
1 modsarethebest 2018-06-07
for:
becoming the best person you can be, finding a purpose in life
contributing in a positive way to the people around you
happy and healthy family, raising children, taking care of your elders
1 Plexipus 2018-06-07
Didn't escape my notice that when you're talking about DEGENERACY you have a bunch of specific examples but when you talk abut what you're for its a bunch of vague, almost worthless platitudes.
You do realize that from her perspective some hardcore feminist SJW type could consider herself as ticking off every one of those boxes so long as she ended up with a long term boyfriend and children right?
1 modsarethebest 2018-06-07
could be.
1 Plexipus 2018-06-07
Allow me to introduce you to Degeneracy's distant cousin, Moral Relativism. She's single ;)
1 spookyguy109 2018-06-07
1 pizzashill 2018-06-07
No shit. They aren't real libertarians. They're right-wing nationalists that don't want to admit it.
1 NationalismIsFun 2018-06-07
Nationalists tend to be the kind of people who shout their belief from rooftops. It's not a particularly subtle ideology
1 Neronoah 2018-06-07
Because of the golden mean fallacy.
1 0192837465-TK1 2018-06-07
It was hillarious watching one of sargon's recent videos where he spends like 30 seconds pussyfooting around climate change in response to an off cuff to avoid pissing off his rightwinger audience.
"Um, you see I don't know, I don't have a position on climate change, I haven't done enough research, well obviously non-mandmade climate change is a thing, but is there enough research to say on made? I just don't know why climate changes. It's a very complicated and very hard subject that requires a lot of research, I haven't studied it so I just can't know, I don't know why it's happening, I could potentially believe that it's humans, but it's very big and I don't know, it's just too hard, and I see things from both sides, you see it's hard, and I'm not a scientist."
1 imnotagayboy 2018-06-07
lmao
1 Snowayne2 2018-06-07
What I don't understand is why there are people that consider Sargon an intellectual.
1 imaginarycreatures 2018-06-07
It gives him a reason to say something in a hour that he could just as easily say in 5 minutes. Which, I assume, leads to more YouTube bucks. Though I'm not sure if he's still monetized.
1 Snowayne2 2018-06-07
But he doesn't do a good job appearing smart.
1 imaginarycreatures 2018-06-07
To enough people, saying a lot of words looks exactly the same as being smart.
1 she_sucks_me 2018-06-07
Sargon does not support the white ethnostate therefore he is not rightwing.
1 Tiepilot789 2018-06-07
No but in his talk with Andrew Anglin he said he wouldn't oppose laws to slowly remove non-whites living in a country.
He's opposed to violence which the alt right considers the best strategy.
1 she_sucks_me 2018-06-07
If he said that I guess you could call him right wing. Was the US a right wing country in the 1800's? Most people would say the early US embodies liberalism. IMO rightwing is fascism.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-06-07
The US was conservative by our standards, although not by those of its time. Tbh your views are the result of trying to categorize police by a single-axis scale instead of viewing economic and sociopolitical views as separate.
1 Feanorfanclub 2018-06-07
LIBERALISTS
1 AlohaWarrior34 2018-06-07
Jean Francois "Rape a Potato For the Ethnostate" Garipley.
1 imnotagayboy 2018-06-07
Did we get a confession why he wanted to get a retard pregnant? Was it for some weird experiment?
1 newcomer_ts 2018-06-07
This is rappers dissing each other but with finer language and less violence implied.
Still, grown men acting like petty children…
1 0192837465-TK1 2018-06-07
It was hillarious watching one of sargon's recent videos where he spends like 30 minutes pussyfooting around climate change to avoid pissing off his rightwinger audience.
"Um, you see I don't know, I haven't done enough research, well obviously non-mandmade climate change is a thing, but is there enough research to say on made? I just don't know why climate changes. It's a very complicated and very hard subject that requires a lot of research, I haven't studied it so I just can't know, I don't know why it's happening, I could potentially believe that it's humans, but it's very big and I don't know, it's just too hard, and I see things from both sides, you see it's hard, and I'm not a scientist."
1 lurker093287h 2018-06-07
Can somebody who isn't a nazi give me a quick rundown on this one please.
1 GuillotinesNOW 2018-06-07
Ain't nobody with half a brain watching 20 minutes of that retard.
1 jaredschaffer27 2018-06-07
On a scale of 0-10, where 0 is Hutu anger in 1994 Rwanda and 10 is absolutely devoted love, anyone who is outside a 4-6 when it comes to their feelings on Sargon should be ground into dust and spread over topsoil.
1 NationalismIsFun 2018-06-07
I'm usually around a 4 but occasionally dip down toward a 3, might be time to break out the ole woodchipper