However they don't seem to understand that this will just hurt the business. If you have a sign that says no gays then just don't buy from them. That's why this is allowed, the only possible outcome is that you make yourself look bad, possibly.
How retarded are you exactly? The supreme court didn't overturn civil rights law holy shit.
In the baker case it was argued that they might rule in his favor because he's an artist but the only reason they overturned the state ruling was because the state called his religious beliefs abhorrent and acted like little shits.
The Supreme Court actually was going to rule discrimination in private businesses unconstitutional, but the 1964 civil rights act ruled the issue moot. I think this confuses a lot of people into thinking that the issue had nothing to do with the constitution. Look, if a business bans black people from a venue, who are they going to call to throw the black people out when they refuse? The police. So the state would in that insurance effectively be endorsing discrimination. There's no way to allow it without implicit state approval. It's sort of like how people used to try to enforce segregation by putting clauses in the deed to their house forbidding people from selling it to a black person, the state ultimately would've had to be the one to step in and enforce that provision, and its enforcement would violate the constitution.
11 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-06-08
Now with added cancer!
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 AggressionSsb 2018-06-08
Haha gay
However they don't seem to understand that this will just hurt the business. If you have a sign that says no gays then just don't buy from them. That's why this is allowed, the only possible outcome is that you make yourself look bad, possibly.
1 pizzashill 2018-06-08
yeah, everyone knows how your way worked out pre-civil rights era.
1 I_DRINK_TO_FORGET 2018-06-08
How retarded are you exactly? The supreme court didn't overturn civil rights law holy shit.
In the baker case it was argued that they might rule in his favor because he's an artist but the only reason they overturned the state ruling was because the state called his religious beliefs abhorrent and acted like little shits.
1 watermark02 2018-06-08
The Supreme Court actually was going to rule discrimination in private businesses unconstitutional, but the 1964 civil rights act ruled the issue moot. I think this confuses a lot of people into thinking that the issue had nothing to do with the constitution. Look, if a business bans black people from a venue, who are they going to call to throw the black people out when they refuse? The police. So the state would in that insurance effectively be endorsing discrimination. There's no way to allow it without implicit state approval. It's sort of like how people used to try to enforce segregation by putting clauses in the deed to their house forbidding people from selling it to a black person, the state ultimately would've had to be the one to step in and enforce that provision, and its enforcement would violate the constitution.
1 SethRichOrDieTryin 2018-06-08
r/AsAJudge
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-06-08
I like when r/drama tries to be r/AsAchristian lol
1 coooger 2018-06-08
Imagine how nice a no niggers allowed movie theater would be
1 SmellyFarts123 2018-06-08
you are all gay, so there
1 Gtyyler 2018-06-08
/u/ibzl post your gavel.
1 automatic_chuck 2018-06-08
Law is boring.