Will someone help me with my essay

You're a really great person. I wish you endless bussy, Inshallah.

y tho

I didn't do nothin

I understand that in the mind of a NEET autist, your little sub is literally the most important thing in the world to you, but you get that being mad over "brigading muh sub" is the most pathetic shit in the world, right /u/Truecelism2?

/u/Truecelism2 What happened, buddy? What made you like this? Why don't you quit that faggy incel shit and come be a dramanaut. We ain't got pussy but you can have all the bussy a boi could ever dream of.

Aw shit queen I just got read

I got rekt :-(

/u/Truecelism2 - Here is my essay please unban me now

THE SCOURGE OF THE ROASTIE

BY: /u/TayTaysMayoGussy

It is with a great deal of reluctance that I am once again writing about how the kind of forced unity and subordination to “important” issues that Females advocates is, paradoxically, the one way guaranteed to foster discord and division. My reluctance stems from a concern that Females will read this letter and use it as an excuse to burn our fair cities to the ground. Here's the story: I hate its mutinous obloquies with the white-hot passion of a thousand fiery suns all simultaneously going supernova. Please re-read and memorize that sentence if you still believe that Females's debauches are the result of a high-minded urge to do sociological research.

As one commentator put it, whenever Females wants to convince someone that you and I are objects for it to use then casually throw away and forget like old newsprint that's performed its duty catching bird droppings, it turns instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink. These words and idioms are intended to distract the listener from noticing that Females's goal is to resolve a moral failure with an immoral solution. How ungrateful is that? How muzzy-headed? How conceited? Females's sidekicks have been staggering around like punch-drunk fighters hit too many times—stunned, confused, betrayed, and trying desperately to rationalize Females's mentally deficient announcements. It is definitely not a pretty sight.

Females will remake the map of the world into a Females-friendly checkerboard of puppet regimes and occupation governments long before it can convert me into one of its attendants. From a purely technical point of view, Females has already begun influencing the attitudes of dominant culture towards any environment or activity that is predominantly frowsy. I wish I were joking, but I'm not. What's more, Females is an organization utterly without honor, without principles, without a shred of genuine patriotism. That's why I say that we ought to arraign it at the tribunal of public opinion. That'll make Females think once—I would have said “twice”, but I don't see any indication that it has previously given any thought to the matter—before showing us a gross miscarriage of common judgment. We need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with Females. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that my general thesis is that Females wants to base racial definitions on lineage, phrenological characteristics, skin hue, and religion. Personally, I don't want that. Personally, I prefer freedom. If you also prefer freedom then you should be working with me to help and encourage others. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: If it were true, as Females claims, that its blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur, then I wouldn't be saying that Females's fantasy is to destroy that which is the envy of—and model for—the entire civilized world. It dreams of a world that grants it such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of Stalinism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Females announcing some jealous thing every few weeks.

If you can make any sense out Females's bumptious crusades then you must have gotten higher marks in school than I did. Females's methods are much subtler now than ever before. Females is more adept at hidden mind control, and its techniques of social brainwash are much more appealingly streamlined and homogenized. If you were to unpack and analyze the philosophical assumptions behind Females's claim that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction, you would find that its malisons are unmannerly. They're unnecessary. They're counterproductive. Whenever I encounter them I think that Females would have us believe that we can trust it not to put increased disruptive powers in the hands of hideous schmegeggies of one sort or another. Yeah, right. And I also suppose that the ideas of “freedom” and “Machiavellianism” are Siamese twins? The fact of the matter is that it has no discernible talents. The only things Females has certainly mastered are biological functions. Well, I suppose it's also good at convincing people that it has a fearless dedication to reason and truth, but my point is that Females's hatchet men were recently seen reviling everything in the most obscene terms and dragging it into the filth of the basest possible outlook. That's not a one-time accident or oversight. That's Females's policy.

If Females were paying attention—which it would seem it is not, as I've already gone over this—it'd see that there is no such thing as evil in the abstract. It exists only in the evil deeds of evil organizations like Females. Females is thoroughly disorderly, as it has proved to my complete satisfaction. As a parenthetical note, while Females and other vulgar primates sometimes differ on the details and scale of their upcoming campaigns of terror they never fail to agree on the basic principle and substance. Hence, it is imperative that you understand that seeing it succeed at fanning the flames of ruffianism into a planet-spanning inferno has left me with a number of unanswered questions—questions such as “Isn't it the stingy ragamuffin who recently wanted to pooh-pooh the concerns of others?”

Let's understand one fundamental fact: Females is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in its own biases, gets into all sorts of mordacious speculation, and then makes no effort to test out its speculations—and that's just the short list! The foregoing analysis is self-evident even if it is sometimes overlooked. Less evident are the specific ways in which we should offer manumission to those who are held captive by Females's indecent activities. Believe it or not, I believe I know why Females has been engulfing reason and humanity within waves of Marxism and fear. It considers it an interesting sociological experiment for determining whether people can be influenced to add insult to injury. There is no more noble activity than helping people help themselves. The interest of that portion of social arrangement is a trust in the hands of all those who compose it; and as none but crafty, self-satisfied tightwads would justify it in abuse, none but schmoes would barter it away for their own personal advantage. The implication, of course, is that Females is trying hard to convince a substantial number of infelicific, sullen battologists to blame those who have no power to change the current direction of events. It presumably believes that the “hundredth-monkey phenomenon” will spontaneously incite lawless losers to behave likewise. The reality, however, is that Females relies heavily on “useful idiots”, that is, people who unwittingly do Females's dirty work for it. Without its swarms of useful idiots, Females would not have been able to conceal the fact that I do not find smears that are snappish, stuporous, and spineless to be “funny”. Maybe I lack a sense of humor, but maybe every time it tells its goombahs that it is entitled to lead a juvenile jihad against those who oppose it, their eyes roll into the backs of their heads as they become mindless receptacles of unsubstantiated information, which they accept without question.

(contd)

Females's reports are eerily similar to those promoted by madmen such as Pol Pot. What's scary, though, is that their extollment of emotionalism has been ratcheted up a few notches from anything Pol Pot ever conjured up. Females whines about foul-mouthed yo-yos, yet it enthusiastically supports mudslinging flimflammers.

Because Females wasn't listening when I said this before, I'm forced to repeat myself: I feel that we should let Females prattle on about how it is a champion of liberty and individual expression. At this point, such exsufflicate jibber jabber is harmless enough, albeit a little unsettling. Nevertheless, it does demonstrate how Females's feelings guide its interpretation of reality. Of course, subjective feelings are not always trustworthy guides. Unrestrained, they cause Females to convert our children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded proletarian cattle. One implication of that is that it has been going around saying that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups. That's a bit of a furphy. The truth is that Females keeps stating over and over again that it knows 100% of everything 100% of the time. This drumbeat refrain is clearly not consistent with the facts on the ground—facts such as that I have no intention to cut and run even if Females were to install a puppet government that pledges allegiance to its cranky crime syndicate. Rather, I will stand my ground and dispel ignorance. Whether or not I'm successful, in Females's quest to make us too confused, demoralized, and disunited to put up an effective opposition to its claims it has left no destructive scheme unutilized.

Females and its hangers-on are uncompanionable crackpots. This is not set down in complaint against them but merely as analysis. Females likes to compare its words to the venerable documents that shaped this nation. The comparison, however, doesn't hold up beyond some uselessly broad, superficial similarities that are so vague and pointless, it's not even worth summarizing them. I've never bothered Females. Yet Females wants to go to great lengths to conceal its true aims and mislead the public. Whatever happened to “live and let live”?

The baneful nature of Females's plans for the future is not just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify. A war of ideas is currently raging. On one side are infantile varmints like Females who fired the first shot by damning this nation and this world to Hell. On the other side are people like you and me who are transforming our culture of war and violence into a culture of peace and nonviolence. If this war teaches us anything, it's that I, for one, can't make heads or tails of Females's actions. I mean, does it want to clear forests, strip the topsoil, and turn a natural paradise into a dust bowl through a self-induced drought, or doesn't it? In short, I feel we must eliminate hatred from Females's heart. I hope other members of the community feel the same.