I don't give a fuck how much you call your flimsy delusions "enlightenment." There is no amount of ceaseless self-deception that will make you accept the charred hellscape of being a miserable useless destitute fucking junkie piece of shit. You know what you are, and it is deeply ugly on every level.

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, removeddit.com, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

The gender of peace strikes again.

The fat bitches are at it again.

The fuck did u/wiggletastic think he was going to get? In r/trollxchromosomes?

It is men, overwhelmingly, who police other men and keep them from harming women. But that's not going to please the crazy beeyotches as long as one woman suffers from the actions of one man. #YesAllMen indeed.

It is men, overwhelmingly, who police other men and keep them from harming women.

It's true that most police officers are men, but who is responsible for the laws against rape and other harm to women? Who makes sure that they are actually enforced? The measures that bring guys like this fucker to jail only exist in countries where women (the majority of the adult public) can vote.

So rape was okay before women could vote?

Of course! There were no laws against tape in Britain before women got the vote a hundred years ago.

Or - and I'm just spitballing here but work with me - perhaps there's a correlation between countries that police rape effectively and countries where they worked for women's suffrage, but one of these doesn't cause the other.

Of course, I can well believe that there's such a thing as women screaming ever louder for more to be done about rape, while expecting someone else to do the heavy lifting.

But was rape okay before women got the right to vote? Can you answer without being a defensive insecure weirdo?

There were no laws against rape in Britain before women got the vote a hundred years ago.

yes there were

Yes and no, you could rape your wife and the courts supported it because it was part of the marriage contract.

Which by definition meant it wasn't rape in the legal sense because the marriage contract was already a signed consent.

Ever hear of sarcasm?

no, what's that?

It's where I say something not intending it to be taken as literally true - and you can often tell by reading the rest of the post for context, if that's not too much effort.

not too sharp are you

No, otherwise I wouldn't make the basic mistake of arguing with a retard -- which is always a dumb idea, because they drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.

aww look at you getting all mad

no u, tardloaf

but who is responsible for the laws against rape

Men.

Who makes sure that they are actually enforced?

Men.

The measures that bring guys like this fucker to jail only exist in countries where women (the majority of the adult public) can vote.

Categorically untrue.

In western history, rape has been given the legal distinction of a crime going back at least to the dictatorship of Julius Caesar.

No one here is surprised that you're an agenda posting retard, but at least don't make up such a ludicrously unbelievable lie.

lol, that's not even close to true. Rape was illegal in the same way that theft was illegal-- it was the unlawful use of another man's property. But marital rape-- where a man is abusing what he sees as his own property--- was only made illegal in the UK in 1991.

I think you know that, though.

you can't seriously be trying to argue that men have any problem with rape based on principle.

Of course not, we all know that men are unemotional rape machines and certainly can never develop romantic or even benevolent feelings towards a femoid.

Of course not, we all know that men are unemotional rape machines

You heard it here first, folks, for the first time in Internet history, a wurstie is actually honest about this! Welcome to my hall of fame, VidiotGamer. :)

and certainly can never develop romantic or even benevolent feelings towards a femoid.

Wait, were you being sarcastic before? I believe that wursties can develop "romantic feelings" (get twitterpaited) but actual benevolent feelings? Benevolent sexism serves the primary function of keeping women from piping up about hostile sexism so I find it pretty unlikely that it's altruistically motivated.

Was this woman raped by her husband? Why are you mentioning this?

To make a point.

Irrelevant point, brainlet.

Women have been getting protected for thousands of years before they could vote. There were also laws before there was democracy.

I think the femoids on Twitter have a reasonable complaint that there are many aspects of society that are at odds with their ability to obtain self actualization. Sure, there are similar things that men have to deal with, but on the whole I will give them that one.

However, a lot of that is because of the biological imperative, the same imperative that makes it so that our entire society is built from the ground up to provide for the care, health and protection of femoids.

That's not saying that they get treated equally or better than men, it's just pointing out that we as a society are doing literally everything we can to protect them.

I think the femoids on Twitter have a reasonable complaint that there are many aspects of society that are at odds with their ability to obtain self actualization.

lol nah their standards are just way too high because theyve been told theyre special princesses all their lives

lol, no. Men kicked their wives around on the floor and thought it was their God given right to do. By law, it was their right to do so until women got the vote. If a man did this to any other man he'd be charged with assault. Also, think about what you're arguing here: Sure, it's almost entirely men who rape and kill and assault women, but men will sometimes help put other men for it, so it evens out. Talk about "dindus."

Most murder victims by a massive margin are men and it is usually committed by men. Does this mean men don't care about murder?

You realize criminals are a tiny percentage of humanity?

Feminism really is for brainlets.

Most murder victims by a massive margin are men

[Citation needed]

You realize criminals are a tiny percentage of humanity?

No they're not, but most men are now motivated by the law to avoid committing major crimes.

Rape has been illegal for thousands of years.

It really hasn't. In some parts of the world men still lawfully hang the victim for it.

Prove to me that you know the inner thoughts and drives of most men.

You are really proving your brainlet status if you don't realize that men are the primary victims of violence by an absurd ratio.

Prove to me that you know the inner thoughts and drives of most men.

Uhh how could I prove that?

men are the primary victims of violence by an absurd ratio.

Something tells me that you wouldn't describe the rate at which men are the perpetuators of violence as absurd, even though it's much higher. Probably because you don't see that as any problem.

Prove to me that you know the inner thoughts and drives of most men.

Uhh how could I prove that?

I don't know, yet you were the dumb cunt that stated it as a matter of fact that you do know it.

Something tells me that you wouldn't describe the rate at which men are the perpetuators of violence as absurd, even though it's much higher. Probably because you don't see that as any problem.

I literally said in prior comments that men commit most of the violence. You are too stupid for anything other than menial tasks.

I don't know, yet you were the dumb cunt that stated it as a matter of fact that you do know it.

I mean, I can judge by their actions that men aren't constantly thinking about how much they don't want to commit violence.

I literally said in prior comments that men commit most of the violence.

You didn't say it was absurd though.

You are too stupid for anything other than menial tasks.

I'm LOLing at the image in my head of you saying this. Like you have some fantasy going on in your head where you're my boss or whatever. Pretty sure you and I are both NEETs, sweetie.

Well at least you admit to being a NEET which surprised literally no one.

Violence is committed by a very tiny subset of society and yet you think you are a mind reader for all of humanity.

I have literally no wish to ever be your boss. I would hate my life with having to deal with idiots like you on a daily basis.

Something tells me that you wouldn't describe the rate at which men are the perpetuators of violence as absurd, even though it's much higher. Probably because you don't see that as any problem.

Something tells me that you wouldn't describe the speed at which you shift goalposts as absurd, either. Probably because you don't see that as any problem. (You may have meant "perpetrators" btw. Literacy. Work towards it.)

I was gonna respond but then I realized that you're Australian. Of course you sympathize with the perp, you share his criminal mind. You're not worth the thumb movements it would take to respond to you.

I'm not Australian, idiot. Australia is where we sent our criminals to.

Username is Gil

Nope, you're Australian.

Nope, I'm a Tolkien geek and it is Sindarin-Elvish for "Star-harp".

Incidentally I posted over in the Melbourne thread that the perp deserved to rot in hell, but don't let facts confuse your pretty little head.

Harp Star is a Japanese Thoroughbred racehorse... So you're a horse girl

That's a step down from Australian. I think we're done here.

(http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/InsaneTrollLogic)[I'm inclined to agree].

Most murder victims by a massive margin are men

[Citation needed]

Got your citation right here, dumbfuck

According to the data given by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, worldwide, 78.7% of homicide victims are male, and in 193 of the 202 listed countries or regions, males were more likely to be killed than females.

thought it was their God given right to do

The vast majority of people who have had wives didn't believe in God.

Wait, let me guess. You believe in the debunked “rule of thumb” myth.

No, there was definitely not any kind of limit to the instrument a man could use or to what extent he could beat his wife. Some law book I found on Google books for New York in the early 1900s specified "not to the point that he kills his wife." You're an idiot if you think women have ever been protected from domestic abuse until very recently (and even now only in certain places).

There were also laws before there was democracy.

Hell to the yes. The Law of Moses even allowed that if a young girl was raped in a field out of town then the blame lay wholly with the man because she cried for help and there was no-one to hear. Note the law presumed conclusively that she did cry for help and didn't even need to ask anything else to rule her innocent of blame.

Admittedly some of the other stuff in Leviticus and so on looks primitive to 21st-century sensibilities but on this particular one you have to give it points for trying, at least.

That's TwoX, which has plenty of different types of users from when it was a default

If you know about mass rapes committed by militaries then you'll realize that anyone who thinks that the vast majority (or a majority at all) of men are intrinsically motivated to refrain from commiting crimes like this is hopelessly naive.

Or - and this will be troubling, but bear with - how men selected for aggression behave after a period of life or death struggle to women who aren't of their own tribe, culture or nation, doesn't generalize to how most men behave under ordinary circumstances to women who are.

It's like saying men want deep down to rape other men because it happens in prison.

This guy doesn't want to stick his dick into another man's hairy shithole.

FAG

ALERT

I mean, men want sex. That’s just a manifestation of that under extreme circumstances.

yeah because soldiers who have been in constant warfare and had their minds warped slowly over time by extremely violence , is a good way to prove how the average man in society thinks.

by the way i'm going to judge all women by the handful of crazy ones that accuse men of rape for revenge, cause that is totally logical.

how many women have used atomic weapons in times of war?

checkmate

you know that a woman was one of the leading people in nuclear science right? i only know it cause one of the few impressive women throughout history.

Why don't they blame autism?

Can we do the same by race, or is it only by gender?

that depends, which race?

Any nonwhite one?

Telling them keep up the good work?

Not many of them do any work TBH

What I always find funny about post like this, whenever someone asks what making this a men's issue actually means as far as what men should do, the response is always some 'r/IAmVeryBadAss $100% everyone clapped Albert Einstein' type story as an example.

The answer is for men to throw themselves into the cogs until they stop turning. Same as usual.

This is a shitty agenda post reflective of an SRDine mindset. Keep yourself safe immediately.

It attracted the fighting into the comments section.

One generation plants the tree, another gets the shade.