The thesis must clearly point out that real freedom for women is possible only through slave labor. The inspirable connection between the social and subhuman position of the woman, and private pussy in the means of production, must be strongly brought out. That will draw a clear and ineradicable line of distinction between our policy and turdwave feminism. And it will also supply the basis for regarding the woman question as a part of the social question, of the slavers’ problem, and so bind it firmly to the post-apocalyptic survival struggle and the revolution. The enslaving women’s movement must itself be a mass movement, a part of the general mass movement. Not only of the enslaving men, but of all the non-female exploited and oppressed, all the victims of the Wasteland or any other surviving society. In that lies its significance for the puss struggles of the meninists and for its historical creation – slave society ….We must win over to our side the millions of toiling women in the shanty towns and whore houses. Win them for our penises and in particular for the Mad Max transformation of society. There can be no real mass enslavement without women.

/u/pizzashill irl

HOLY SHIT A DOX

MODSMODSMODSMODS

The gut hang of the one with the purple bandanna 🤢

That one guy in the crowd with a deadpan look though. Seems like he was regretting being packed tightly with the qts around him at that moment.

Page 3 of English newspapers used to be the page with titties on it but the uppity femoids put an end to that :(

The solution is legalized prostitution and sex robots. Remove market value = remove the power. Shore things up by socially discouraging white knighting, beta buxxing, and simpery. Steadily advance with the goal of reversing female suffrage, outlaw alimony and child support, create legal opt-out for fatherhood. Top it all off with fat-shaming, slut-shaming, and make titty streaming heavily taxed.

☝🏿☝🏿☝🏿

Do you have the double D’s for a page 3?

A final solution?

Is the problem logistical? This site can help: https://www.thoughtco.com/passenger-capacity-of-transit-2798765

Bus Rapid Transit (at grade)

90 passengers per vehicle * 15 vehicles per hour = 1,350 passengers per hour per direction. This number suggests a maximum daily ridership of around 20,000, which is what the Los Angeles Metro Orange Line is averaging.

Bus Rapid Transit (grade-separated)

90 passengers per vehicle * 30 vehicles per hour = 2,700 passengers per hour per direction. Note that by lengthening the platforms at bus rapid transit stations to provide more than one space where a bus can stop, you can add more vehicles and thus more capacity.

Light Rail Transit (at grade)

90 passengers per vehicle * 3 vehicles per train * 15 vehicle sets per hour = 4,050 passengers per hour. This number suggests a maximum daily ridership of around 60,000.

Light Rail Transit (grade-separated)

90 passengers per vehicle * 3 vehicles per train * 30 vehicle sets per hour = 8,100 passengers per hour.

Subways

100 passengers per vehicle * 10 vehicles per train * 30 vehicle sets per hour = 30,000 passengers per hour. This number suggests a maximum daily ridership of around 450,000. The Bloor line in Toronto has a daily ridership of almost 500,000, while the Yonge line, which is really two lines, Yonge and University-Spading, has a ridership of over 700,000.

A final solution for the femoid problem? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)