You can't be racist against white people

57  2018-06-28 by reasonabley

45 comments

Lolis are for headpats and feed them healthy food, not for lewd.

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - Outline

I am a bot for archiving links. Contact for info or issues
Click if this site does not work in Outline.com

It's shit like this that makes my life worse as a Eurasian because even if you look amazing you're still a subhuman because Asian women happily marry guys who look like they've been in industrial accidents over an Asian guy. It makes Asian looking males look like the worst fucking losers on earth. The guy is absolutely offensive to look at. Like his face literally makes my stomach churl because he's so ugly. I'd even be mad if he had a white girlfriend People feel they have the liberty to say of course your dad is white. Because white guys see shit like this where some fucking quasimodo looking freak can get Asian girls and they use it as ammo as to how shittyy asian guys are...

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, archive.is*

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

True.

Fuck white people.

Waipipo ams da debil n sheeit

white

people

You can't be racist enough against white people*

rent free in PoC heads

Brick seems cool.

I liked him in Anchorman

Of course you cant.

No you can. Its just a good thing.

You can't be racist against nonhumans.

Can we stop calling them people? It artificially elevates these beasts.

Um, where's the lie, sweaty?

Going to have to put the dog down now.

Take it out back and ol' yeller it.

> No, doggo, this is prejudice not racism.

Why do SJWs love playing word games?

Becauses it's one of the few games that doesn't take physical effort and they can win.

Anyone who does this is an idiot, the proper way is to say that whites aren't people and so they can't be discriminated against.

It's what people do when they're losing an argument.

SJWs

dae sjws xd

What do you call them. The left?

that's more accurate than a gamergate autism-level acronym

But it's not just "the left."

Like, most of "the left" aren't going to fight for things like fat acceptance. That's what SJW's do.

It's an accurate word, do you have an alternative?

I don't feel the need to label groups of people I disagree with.

Ok

Nigger loving pansy ass fags

Because by redefining words they can set up a bait and switch. They believe white people can't be discriminated against, they can't say that cause it's not true, so by changing the definition of the word used for discrimination based on race to not include white people they can imply white people are never victims of discrimination without having to actually make the untennable argument explicitly

"It's not racism, it's just a racially motivated attack! Gosh we wouldn't want to compare it with something bad like racism"

You can be racist towards anything that has nipples.

Typical square nippled mf

Whew, my anime husbandos are safe.

Can you retards stop using archive.is like this? It's for archiving and backups, not avoiding giving them ad revenue.

Disagree... I enjoy that they stick it to the ad budget.

Twitter's UI is so retarded the archive link is better

They deleted the tweet.

Can you fuck off?

No bby.

Lmao it isn't racism because black people have no institutional power. Because you know, when 2 people are in a room and one has a knife that totally matters

Are these real people? I don't fucking get how one could be so retarded.

I don't fucking get how one could be so retarded.

Sign up for a liberal arts degree at your local university and enjoy the ride.

Even if you’re STEM, your breadth coursework will give you a taste

people like this are all over twitter.

lol mayos just mad their going out of style faster than boomers

akshually my sociology book defines racism as twitter+privilege, so see a black person attacking somebody on a bus can never be racist because there's no tweets involved.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the debate in academic sociology just about whether sociology itself has moved beyond discussions of interpersonal racism? And whether "racism" should be used as a shorthand for institutionalized racism or whatever in an academic context? If that's the case, these pseudointellectuals really need to shut the fuck up since Twitter is not an academic setting. Not to mention the debate isn't even settled in academia. Either way, "correcting" the standard definition of racism used by millions of English speakers is what happens when people with lukewarm IQs think their BAs from Bumfuck University automatically make them enlightened.