Depending on who you ask, yes. If someone doesn't like trans people generally they will say that if a guy fucks a transwoman, he's actually fucking a guy, so he's gay. However, if someone sees a transwoman as a woman, they'd consider him straight.
Interestingly the reverse is also true, if a guy fucks a transman, the first group would say that he's gay, while the second group would say straight.
So depending on who you ask, I suppose. A lot of people who are interested in transmen/women exclusively tend to identify themselves as pansexual because that label indicates that they are interested in trans people.
Zoophilia is consensual by default as body language is consent for animals. Negative reactions indicate lack of consent and continuing then makes it abuse. Much like if you pet an animal it's not automatically assault like it would be if you did it to a human without permission, but continuing to do shit that they don't like makes it abuse and you'll probably get bitten.
We are African, and we happened to be in America. We're not American. We are people who formerly were Africans who were kidnapped and brought to America. Our forefathers weren't the Pilgrims. We didn't land on Plymouth Rock. The rock was landed on us. We were brought here against our will. We were not brought here to be made citizens. We were not brought here to enjoy the constitutional gifts that they speak so beautifully about today.
It's not really being pushed by the LGBT community though.
It won't take long before it becomes a full fledged letter.
Two years ago I would say this was ridiculous and hysterical, but then Trump became president. So I'm no longer willing to have faith in the intelligence of the American people.
It's not acceptance, is pointing out the difference between a paedophile and a child molester. One already acted upon their impulses and is a criminal, a paedophile is someone with a mental disease that should receive psychiatric help to restrain those impulses.
The issue comes when you start grouping paedophiles and child molesters together, paedophiles won't feel safe to seek help if they are instantly seen as criminals, which results in many not seeking treatment and maybe eventually acting upon their feelings. See it as, "normalising" bipolar disorder so that people are able to seek help instead of letting their lives get destroyed by it.
Mate you need to chill cause being outraged by a comment and calling them a SJW is kinda ironic.
Nothing I said was promoting paedophilia, all I said is that there's a difference between a mental disease and a crime, and unless you allow people with the condition to seek help without societal reproductions, the crimes will just keep happening in the dark without us being able to stop them. And it's even worse in this particular case since many paedophiles were themselves abused as children, and it becomes a cycle of abuse.
It's the same argument for decriminalising drug use (same argument, not the same situation...), since it allows drug addicts to seek help without being afraid of being arrested for consuming drugs.
Outrage =/= SJW. The outrage isn't the bad part about being an sjw, which you'd know if you weren't one.
That is literally promoting pedophilia. You can't cure them, and "helping them" doesn't work.
The excuse that they were abused as children is to a large degree shown to be wrong. There's only a weak correlation there, and there's no evidence of any causation.
People cans top doing drugs. Can't stop being pedophiles.
What do you want to do then? Kill everyone with paedophilia sexual tendencies? Ignore the issue and push it into the dark again so nobody talks about it and abuse keeps happening?
And again, nothing I'm saying is "promoting" it, you are arguing that by telling people that it's a mental disorder and we should be open to allowing these people to seek treatment without criminal repercussions (if they haven't committed a crime yet obviously) is promoting the disease. People with the disorder will still be there whether you want it or not, ignoring it doesn't solve shit, nothing I'm saying is going to make people go "well I like to fiddle kids and the tv man told me I can seek help for it, so I guess it's ok for me to fiddle some kids now".
Sorry I'm not twelve so I don't fully understand the intricacies of internet memes.
Ah yes. "hurr durr, anyone who's not a child can't understand the basic definitions of groups on the internet". Great excuse for being a mouthbreather.
That's literally not true.
That's fucking hilarious. You genuinely linked a German nutjob, who's a pedo-apologist, and even he didn't say it actually works, lmao. He just "hopes it can help".
And again, nothing I'm saying is "promoting" it, you are arguing that by telling people that it's a mental disorder and we should be open to allowing these people to seek treatment without criminal repercussions (if they haven't committed a crime yet obviously) is promoting the disease.
Yes, because it attempts to create acceptance for the disorder in society. Unless your attempt at fixing them is locking them away permanently, it ain't gonna fix shit. More acceptance and openness for them is simply dangerous.
We lock up every other group of psychopath who admits to wanting to hurt other people, why is this group an exception?
There's no such thing as a non-abusive paedophile. There are just pre- and post-abuse paedophiles. If you let them go freely they will eventually hurt a child.
People with the disorder will still be there whether you want it or not, ignoring it doesn't solve shit,
Ignoring it doesn't solve shit. Execution or permanent seclusion from society does.
nothing I'm saying is going to make people go "well I like to fiddle kids and the tv man told me I can seek help for it, so I guess it's ok for me to fiddle some kids now".
Lmao, you have no fucking idea what you're talking about. These fucks are literally making child sex dolls for the pedos and handing them out in attempts to soothe them. Of course, that just escalates the sexualisation of children in their minds and makes them more likely to commit abuse against kids.
And, as mentioned several times. This is just the first fucking step. First the concept of a paedophile who doesn't commit abuse and is just cursed with a horrible disease and is doomed to live with that his whole life, but totally won't diddle any kids, is brought up as a concept in society to attract sympathy for these poor people. Then the next step of acceptance comes, then the next, then the next.
Was this one of the events where the community decided cops were not welcome to be there? Kinda amusing, I've seen people saying in the comments that Pride organizers should have asked the cops to remove them.
Advocating violence against evil hateful cunts is unisex
We're for throwing rocks at evil men too, Nazis, KKK and other such hate groups. Or are you suggesting that we shouldn't treat TERFs equally to other hate groups because they're women?
The leftist strategy of initiating violence is retarded, bait your enemies into violence and make sure to record it so that you look like the good guys. Jesus Christ these idiots make it so easy for them.
Literally impossible to calm Trudeau down once he's gotten started, best thing to do is just not get him started in the first place. That means no short skirts in the workplace, long sleeves, nothing that would trigger his wayward gaze.
You can't commit genocide against a group of people that is only defined by a shared crossdressing hobby. They aren't a fucking genos so you can't cide them.
I know you guys like to shit on TERFs but you have to understand that a majority of the lesbian transwomen are really just autogynephillic men and are nothing like the qt traps you guys jerk off to. They intrude on the lesbian community with male entitlement, literal dicks, and gross behavior.
I understand this but you must realize that it is a small price to pay (well I'm not paying anything for it, lol) for the off-chance that some of those who transition do become qt traps for me to jerk off to. Nothing personal.
I jack off to the thought of being a woman a lot, I wouldn't dream of chopping my dick off. What the hell would I jack off to the thought of being a woman with? If you look at your dick and are like "Yeah, I don't need that", IMO that's pretty much proof enough for me.
that's a strange thing really and i have found it confusing hearing that from men. I masturbate too.. But it's never about being anything beyond a more attractive version of myself. Trying to be something else just breaks the immersion and appeal to me. narcissistic as that may sound.
The more mainstream ones generally have more nuance, but TERFdom as a whole are their own worse PR nightmare. I have even seen them talk of male animals and otherwise normal reproductive born women with genetic conditions as agents of the patriarchy.
If TERFs Kept the heat up but called their targets Autogynephiles, rather than going after all trans.. they would have likely won by now. But given most are fat old dykes who are nothing like the young attractive lesbians targeted by transvestite troons; this is just a continuation of their misandric crusade started by second wave feminism in the 1970s.
155 comments
1 BussyShillBot 2018-07-07
YOU ARE ALL ALREADY DEAD 💀💀. YOU JUST DONT KNOW 🤔 IT YET.
WE OUTNUMBER YOU. WE REMEMBER YOU. NO 😣 ONE 1️⃣ HAS FORGOTTEN. NO 😣 ONE 1️⃣ HAS FORGIVEN.
Enjoy the time ⌚ you have 🈶 left 👈. JUSTICE 👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️ IS 🈶 COMING. Tick ✅✅ tock.
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 911roofer 2018-07-07
Sapient
1 BigPriceToupee 2018-07-07
"I am the September Eleven!"
"I will always be the September Eleven"
1 Thulean-Dragon 2018-07-07
Good tbh.
Gays are old hat and trannies are insufferable.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-07
But TERFs are worse because they think dick is worse than gussy.
1 headasplodes 2018-07-07
Dude gussy lmao
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-07
Dude dude gussy lmao lmao.
1 redmugofcoffee 2018-07-07
very radcent of you to post this in every fucking r/drama thread
1 SnapshillBot 2018-07-07
Yes we've established that you aren't very bright, no need to tell me you also have trouble reading paragraphs, I assumed it was so already.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2018-07-07
Why is it LGBT? Trans isn’t a sexual orientation.
1 Power_Incarnate 2018-07-07
It's long past LGBT, it's now LGBTTQQIAAP
1 zergling_Lester 2018-07-07
* LGBTTQQIAAPF
1 PseudonymIncognito 2018-07-07
LGBTQWTFOMGBBQ
1 pozzedshill 2018-07-07
LGBTEDITHPIAF
1 DistortedLines 2018-07-07
Lmao 3 different iterations of the same comment, imagine being this desperate for karma
1 mcslibbin 2018-07-07
Jesus christ shut /r/drama down
1 DistortedLines 2018-07-07
It's all our newfriends
1 mcslibbin 2018-07-07
I once did that bit and somebody here got mad at me for trying to "deplatform" their autism
1 Slaanesh_0 2018-07-07
Aksychually its LGBTQQIBRAAAP
1 MechaChiroptera 2018-07-07
ra ta ta
1 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2018-07-07
LGBTQQIBBBBBBBBBRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
snnnnniiiiiiffffffffffff...oh yes my dear....sssnnnnnnnnnnnniiiiiiiiffffffff....quite pungent indeed
1 PUBLIQclopAccountant 2018-07-07
GALAGALAGAGAHAGAHAHAGALALALAG
1 AlwaysFeral 2018-07-07
I'm just going to say "Big Gay".
1 CIA__ 2018-07-07
For you.
1 imnotagayboy 2018-07-07
Why do you hate 2s people?
1 SomeoneOnThelnternet 2018-07-07
It is if you identify as it being it.
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2018-07-07
So you can be a part of it if you only fuck trans people?
1 MechaChiroptera 2018-07-07
Yeah now I'm curious
1 Justinat0r 2018-07-07
Depending on who you ask, yes. If someone doesn't like trans people generally they will say that if a guy fucks a transwoman, he's actually fucking a guy, so he's gay. However, if someone sees a transwoman as a woman, they'd consider him straight.
Interestingly the reverse is also true, if a guy fucks a transman, the first group would say that he's gay, while the second group would say straight.
So depending on who you ask, I suppose. A lot of people who are interested in transmen/women exclusively tend to identify themselves as pansexual because that label indicates that they are interested in trans people.
1 MacAndShits 2018-07-07
Also, B implies there are 2 genders, which isn't the case
1 MechaChiroptera 2018-07-07
There's more?
1 nanonan 2018-07-07
It's a spectrum, with women on one side, men on the other and freaks who need electroshock in the middle.
1 KingWayneX 2018-07-07
!redditsilver
1 Mao_Zedong_Thot 2018-07-07
I'm bigenderal
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-07-07
Drag queens were a pretty important part of the whole LGBT movement, tho
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2018-07-07
That’s not trans
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-07-07
Both pretend to be gussy, tho.
1 Thulean-Dragon 2018-07-07
Yeah but they do it for fun. Half of them aren't even gay.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-07-07
Pretty sure trans don't do it for a job.
1 MargarineIsEvil 2018-07-07
They're on the trannie shit list now though.
1 Wopitikitotengo 2018-07-07
Can't wait for tranny/drag queen urban warfare tbqh
1 YoHeadAsplode 2018-07-07
To quote a friend, "it's like blackface for women"
1 MargarineIsEvil 2018-07-07
Meh, I'm a woman and I find it entertaining.
1 PhysicsIsMyMistress 2018-07-07
Does it need to be?
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2018-07-07
Yes.
1 PhysicsIsMyMistress 2018-07-07
Why
1 OnionBits 2018-07-07
Because mental illness isn't sexuality, sweaty
1 mcslibbin 2018-07-07
counterpoint: straight people
1 OnionBits 2018-07-07
This. I admit defeat, you are correct. Gas the breeders
1 PhysicsIsMyMistress 2018-07-07
Who says it has to be about sexuality?
1 MoonCricketJamFace 2018-07-07
LGBT. ONE OF THOSE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHERS.
1 PhysicsIsMyMistress 2018-07-07
Well the actual term isn't LGBT the term is Gender and Sexual Minorities
1 OnionBits 2018-07-07
1 PhysicsIsMyMistress 2018-07-07
Imagine being surprised that terms change as time goes on.
1 OnionBits 2018-07-07
Hang on I'll imagine it....
Nope still retard
1 PhysicsIsMyMistress 2018-07-07
Okay person who thinks nuclear physics is still called atomic physics
1 OnionBits 2018-07-07
Imagine comparing the advancement of science to faggots getting bored
1 PhysicsIsMyMistress 2018-07-07
Uh what that's not advancement of science that's just a name being changed
1 OnionBits 2018-07-07
Okay you're right, I'm glad we agree on my previous point :6)
Check m8, mentally ill individual
1 PhysicsIsMyMistress 2018-07-07
You're a sorry excuse for a troll.
1 KingWayneX 2018-07-07
WORDS MEAN SOMETHING!!!!!!
1 MoonCricketJamFace 2018-07-07
Then they’d put GSM everywhere not LGBT.
1 lordtyp0 2018-07-07
No it isn't.
1 SlowFatHusky 2018-07-07
Putting a rainbow on products and selling them for much more money?
1 watermark02 2018-07-07
Transexuality is a disorder of the body, not the mind.
1 OnionBits 2018-07-07
1 whenweriiide 2018-07-07
Man, visitors to this sub sure seem to have issues with body temperature regulation
1 ineedmorealts 2018-07-07
Historic reasons. Trans people get lumped in with homo and bi sexual as evil sexual deviants.
1 die_rattin 2018-07-07
So do pedos and zoos but for some reason they don’t get included
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2018-07-07
Those aren’t consensual
1 UserUnknown2 2018-07-07
That's what I love about how dumb the argument is.
It's like every time it gets brought up it just shows that the person arguing is oblivious to how consent works
1 heavenlytoaster 2018-07-07
Says the non-vegan
1 PUBLIQclopAccountant 2018-07-07
Then the pony intelligence research is far behind schedule! Where is my fully-sentient pony waifu?
1 DeathByDragonDildo 2018-07-07
Zoophilia is consensual by default as body language is consent for animals. Negative reactions indicate lack of consent and continuing then makes it abuse. Much like if you pet an animal it's not automatically assault like it would be if you did it to a human without permission, but continuing to do shit that they don't like makes it abuse and you'll probably get bitten.
1 lordtyp0 2018-07-07
Found the animal fucker.
1 DeathByDragonDildo 2018-07-07
No(t yet).
1 AlphaOmegaSith 2018-07-07
Fuck off Aluzky
1 imnotagayboy 2018-07-07
It's bestiality, then.
1 Eskain 2018-07-07
SHUT FUCK THAT DOLPHIN LOVED ME
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2018-07-07
You know, I might consider dolphins an exception mostly because they are intelligent violent rapists by nature.
1 Roughed_Grouse 2018-07-07
So fucking a dolphin is like being a straight woman?
1 imnotagayboy 2018-07-07
They also have an estimated IQ of around 70. Dolphins are the niggers of the sea.
1 Malc0lm_X 2018-07-07
We are African, and we happened to be in America. We're not American. We are people who formerly were Africans who were kidnapped and brought to America. Our forefathers weren't the Pilgrims. We didn't land on Plymouth Rock. The rock was landed on us. We were brought here against our will. We were not brought here to be made citizens. We were not brought here to enjoy the constitutional gifts that they speak so beautifully about today.
1 imnotagayboy 2018-07-07
Niggers?
1 MLK-Junior 2018-07-07
I have decided to stick with love. Hate is too great a burden to bear.
1 jjj324 2018-07-07
This guys never seen a mare in estrus winking her pussy at you and pinning you against a wall with her rear.
1 JilaX 2018-07-07
Give it a couple of years. There's already some serious pedo-apologist shit being pushed. It won't take long before it becomes a full fledged letter.
1 watermark02 2018-07-07
It's not really being pushed by the LGBT community though.
Two years ago I would say this was ridiculous and hysterical, but then Trump became president. So I'm no longer willing to have faith in the intelligence of the American people.
1 JilaX 2018-07-07
The acceptance stuff and "non-molesting pedophiles" are being pushed hard currently.
That shit is coming right up, once they're done with trans.
1 SpikeReynolds 2018-07-07
It's not acceptance, is pointing out the difference between a paedophile and a child molester. One already acted upon their impulses and is a criminal, a paedophile is someone with a mental disease that should receive psychiatric help to restrain those impulses.
The issue comes when you start grouping paedophiles and child molesters together, paedophiles won't feel safe to seek help if they are instantly seen as criminals, which results in many not seeking treatment and maybe eventually acting upon their feelings. See it as, "normalising" bipolar disorder so that people are able to seek help instead of letting their lives get destroyed by it.
1 JilaX 2018-07-07
And here comes the sjw to promote pedophilia, right on time.
Next step is justifying the consent concept if the pedo identifies as a child, right?
1 SpikeReynolds 2018-07-07
Mate you need to chill cause being outraged by a comment and calling them a SJW is kinda ironic.
Nothing I said was promoting paedophilia, all I said is that there's a difference between a mental disease and a crime, and unless you allow people with the condition to seek help without societal reproductions, the crimes will just keep happening in the dark without us being able to stop them. And it's even worse in this particular case since many paedophiles were themselves abused as children, and it becomes a cycle of abuse.
It's the same argument for decriminalising drug use (same argument, not the same situation...), since it allows drug addicts to seek help without being afraid of being arrested for consuming drugs.
1 JilaX 2018-07-07
Outrage =/= SJW. The outrage isn't the bad part about being an sjw, which you'd know if you weren't one.
That is literally promoting pedophilia. You can't cure them, and "helping them" doesn't work.
The excuse that they were abused as children is to a large degree shown to be wrong. There's only a weak correlation there, and there's no evidence of any causation.
People cans top doing drugs. Can't stop being pedophiles.
1 SpikeReynolds 2018-07-07
Sorry I'm not twelve so I don't fully understand the intricacies of internet memes.
That's literally not true.
What do you want to do then? Kill everyone with paedophilia sexual tendencies? Ignore the issue and push it into the dark again so nobody talks about it and abuse keeps happening?
And again, nothing I'm saying is "promoting" it, you are arguing that by telling people that it's a mental disorder and we should be open to allowing these people to seek treatment without criminal repercussions (if they haven't committed a crime yet obviously) is promoting the disease. People with the disorder will still be there whether you want it or not, ignoring it doesn't solve shit, nothing I'm saying is going to make people go "well I like to fiddle kids and the tv man told me I can seek help for it, so I guess it's ok for me to fiddle some kids now".
1 JilaX 2018-07-07
Ah yes. "hurr durr, anyone who's not a child can't understand the basic definitions of groups on the internet". Great excuse for being a mouthbreather.
That's fucking hilarious. You genuinely linked a German nutjob, who's a pedo-apologist, and even he didn't say it actually works, lmao. He just "hopes it can help".
Yes, because it attempts to create acceptance for the disorder in society. Unless your attempt at fixing them is locking them away permanently, it ain't gonna fix shit. More acceptance and openness for them is simply dangerous.
We lock up every other group of psychopath who admits to wanting to hurt other people, why is this group an exception?
There's no such thing as a non-abusive paedophile. There are just pre- and post-abuse paedophiles. If you let them go freely they will eventually hurt a child.
Ignoring it doesn't solve shit. Execution or permanent seclusion from society does.
Lmao, you have no fucking idea what you're talking about. These fucks are literally making child sex dolls for the pedos and handing them out in attempts to soothe them. Of course, that just escalates the sexualisation of children in their minds and makes them more likely to commit abuse against kids.
And, as mentioned several times. This is just the first fucking step. First the concept of a paedophile who doesn't commit abuse and is just cursed with a horrible disease and is doomed to live with that his whole life, but totally won't diddle any kids, is brought up as a concept in society to attract sympathy for these poor people. Then the next step of acceptance comes, then the next, then the next.
They're literally grooming the public .
1 corprethar 2018-07-07
Was this one of the events where the community decided cops were not welcome to be there? Kinda amusing, I've seen people saying in the comments that Pride organizers should have asked the cops to remove them.
1 DistortedLines 2018-07-07
Lol They'd call the cops the moment they start physically fighting each other.
1 ReBurnInator 2018-07-07
FTFY
1 Orsonius 2018-07-07
Implying they couldn't just beat up a bunch of terfs
1 lifesbrink 2018-07-07
Relevant: https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCynical/comments/8wt7a4/terfs_hijack_london_pride_and_lead_the_parade
1 Sojir 2018-07-07
Among the first comment goobergaber it is mentioned. It seems that the only group unaffected by it is ISIS and now I'm too scared to check ...
1 lifesbrink 2018-07-07
Didn't you know? ISIS was a gibbergafder plant
1 Sojir 2018-07-07
Everything makes sense now....the prophet Muhammad clearly spoke about restoring ethics in videogame journalism and banishing thots away from vidya.
1 dramasexual 2018-07-07
Hah! Awesome. Bongistan doing something right for once.
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2018-07-07
The only women allowed to look like men are us!!
1 DistortedLines 2018-07-07
I love that they make fun of trans women for not passing when they barely pass as humans.
1 ltedt 2018-07-07
r/gendercritical wins this one. Trannies btfo
1 Sojir 2018-07-07
I would say on suicide watch but that nothing out of the ordinary
1 ltedt 2018-07-07
it's 45% now
1 MechaChiroptera 2018-07-07
Is that 2 in 5? I'm bad at fractions
1 DalstonKingsland 2018-07-07
9 in 20
1 parduscat 2018-07-07
Is that an improvement?
1 Mircy 2018-07-07
The ones in GC don't actually go outside
1 charlesgrodinfan 2018-07-07
I guess this is what pooper meant by paradox of tolerance. no one had the stones to remove them from the parade
1 Mao_Zedong_Thot 2018-07-07
"Men with their stones removed unable to bar lesbians from gay public tantrum"
1 Sojir 2018-07-07
It was supposed to be lead by the mayor of London and the NHS :it doesn't get more gay than that.
1 Rusond 2018-07-07
#punch a TERF:
1 pozzedshill 2018-07-07
Everyone hates trannies. TERFs aren’t unique.
1 DistortedLines 2018-07-07
Lol
1 AGucciManeClone 2018-07-07
imagine unironically liking trannies
1 FuckElonMusk69 2018-07-07
Imagine unironically being angry about <.03% of the population
1 AGucciManeClone 2018-07-07
Quite vocal for 0.3%, no?
We should castrate all trannies and block them from internet access forever, they wouldn't be able to live without it
1 Mircy 2018-07-07
Everyone hates terfs also though
1 pozzedshill 2018-07-07
Only the ugly ones
1 Mircy 2018-07-07
Yeah, which is all terfs
1 pozzedshill 2018-07-07
Not all lesbians are ugly.
1 Mircy 2018-07-07
Not all lesbians are terfs, only bitter ones that hate men
1 pozzedshill 2018-07-07
Makes sense!
1 DistortedLines 2018-07-07
This but unironically
1 funkenstein_1 2018-07-07
The dissonance Is strong in this one...
1 FearOfBees 2018-07-07
I get to throw rocks at women? Awesome
1 carthoris26 2018-07-07
It's entertaining to see just how far people will push "this is a denial of basic human rights and outright genocide".
1 KingWayneX 2018-07-07
Is trans heritable now?
1 watermark02 2018-07-07
The leftist strategy of initiating violence is retarded, bait your enemies into violence and make sure to record it so that you look like the good guys. Jesus Christ these idiots make it so easy for them.
1 MOGGMENTUMLMAO 2018-07-07
Calm down Trudeau.
1 watermark02 2018-07-07
Literally impossible to calm Trudeau down once he's gotten started, best thing to do is just not get him started in the first place. That means no short skirts in the workplace, long sleeves, nothing that would trigger his wayward gaze.
1 Orsonius 2018-07-07
Good.
Terfs love to cry misogyny when they get btfo'd for their shitty behavior though. Still. Punch a Terf
1 Roughed_Grouse 2018-07-07
You can't commit genocide against a group of people that is only defined by a shared crossdressing hobby. They aren't a fucking genos so you can't cide them.
1 bozo_merkin 2018-07-07
In the U.S. and Canada the story is always that the trannies have taken over and banned the drag queens.
You win this round, Bongistan.
1 saint2e 2018-07-07
Pride parades being hijacked by hate groups is so 2016.
1 newcomer_ts 2018-07-07
If you find this controversial, you need a doctor. Not just one, a team, in Vienna or something.
1 bareballzthebitch 2018-07-07
Are traps gay?
1 a_thumb_in_my_bum 2018-07-07
Yes👏 You 👏 Are 👏 Gay 👏
1 loli_esports 2018-07-07
Billy harrington says yes
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2018-07-07
RIP ANIKI
1 howdotheyno 2018-07-07
I know you guys like to shit on TERFs but you have to understand that a majority of the lesbian transwomen are really just autogynephillic men and are nothing like the qt traps you guys jerk off to. They intrude on the lesbian community with male entitlement, literal dicks, and gross behavior.
1 newcomer_ts 2018-07-07
I think most of /r/drama agrees with TERFs in this regard, it’s just the their motivations are a bit different.
They see it as patriarchy, hard-on men hate while reasonable people know it’s just a mental disability.
1 J19XV25I70 2018-07-07
I understand this but you must realize that it is a small price to pay (well I'm not paying anything for it, lol) for the off-chance that some of those who transition do become qt traps for me to jerk off to. Nothing personal.
1 MargarineIsEvil 2018-07-07
They're like incels except everyone is scared of offending them.
1 astrometrics2 2018-07-07
Having a literal dick is kind of the point of being a trap
1 watermark02 2018-07-07
I jack off to the thought of being a woman a lot, I wouldn't dream of chopping my dick off. What the hell would I jack off to the thought of being a woman with? If you look at your dick and are like "Yeah, I don't need that", IMO that's pretty much proof enough for me.
1 Ironyno 2018-07-07
that's a strange thing really and i have found it confusing hearing that from men. I masturbate too.. But it's never about being anything beyond a more attractive version of myself. Trying to be something else just breaks the immersion and appeal to me. narcissistic as that may sound.
1 Ironyno 2018-07-07
The more mainstream ones generally have more nuance, but TERFdom as a whole are their own worse PR nightmare. I have even seen them talk of male animals and otherwise normal reproductive born women with genetic conditions as agents of the patriarchy.
If TERFs Kept the heat up but called their targets Autogynephiles, rather than going after all trans.. they would have likely won by now. But given most are fat old dykes who are nothing like the young attractive lesbians targeted by transvestite troons; this is just a continuation of their misandric crusade started by second wave feminism in the 1970s.
1 Mao_Zedong_Thot 2018-07-07
A giant inflatable Brianna Wu floating over London
1 r4chan-cancer 2018-07-07
ITT: MDE losers siding with TERFs.
Horseshoe theory strikes again.
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-07-07
TERFs are /ourgals/
1 astrometrics2 2018-07-07
1 pozzedshill 2018-07-07
Cis gets this, according to /u/mircy
https://old.reddit.com/user/Mircy/comments/8wqzdv/cis_gets_this/
1 Mircy 2018-07-07
I'm dating a cis lol
I just love snuff
1 pozzedshill 2018-07-07
🤢
1 loli_esports 2018-07-07
Based and red pilled
1 WakandanPrincess 2018-07-07
Amazon bonds are Wakandan. A man who makes himself not-a-man is white people nonsense.
1 Feanorfanclub 2018-07-07
1 allanmes 2018-07-07
lol