This is a nice post and all, but I'm guessing that the only reason anyone is even arguing about this because these people believe 3D is superior to 2D.
Lol wut? China is licensing the IP from the IP owner. That's the opposite of stealing.
I see Intel and AMD going to Trump concerning this.
Lol wut? Why would they do that? Just because you're obsessed with dear daddy donnie doesn't mean everyone else is. Besides what the fuck could Trump even do? Make some empty "deal" like he did with NK?
u/fluxstate
AMD is actually letting China loophole the tariffs. AMD is the bad guy here
1) The traffics are retarded
2) China already can and does produce CPU for it's domestic market
3) Producing something that another country won't sell you for a decent price because the leader of that country doesn't understand the basics of international trade isn't a loophole, it's just common sense. No one wants they IT sector to be at the mercy of a rambling fat man who doesn't understand international trade
I may actually boycott AMD over this
Lol no you won't. Unless you're going to move to arm chips (many of which are made in china) or just use old ass intel x86 cpus, you'll be giving AMD money
this is some low low shit that hurts American interests at the cost of helping the Chinese
How? How does letting China licensing the IP they need to produce x86-64 cpus hurt America?
So who you gonna buy chips from? Qualcomm? LMFAO.
AMD, if they stop trying to move manufacturing overseas at the cost of national security and blue collar American union jobs.
Oh my fucking god, these chips are for the CHINESE MARKET. Not the American market. They aren't shipping American jobs anywhere, they're shipping Chinese jobs to China.
Jesus fucking christ, can we please stop this shit?
the whole reason for the trade tariffs was to stop china from abusing our IP, now AMD IS LETTING THEM!
Lol. They aren't letting china abuse anything, they're licensing some IP to china. And yea this is what happens when you put retarded tariffs on other countries, they move as much as they can in house, like everyone said they would.
AMD can become the bad guy here, really quick, if they don't put a stop to this shit
Lol not AMD, intel or China give a shit what you think.
A lot of companies have gotten screwed over signing contracts with Chinese companies who quickly abandon the contracts at the first opportunity and take their IP. However really this is the company in questions fault for signing the contract in the first place. Often they go back into the US all butthurt and massively exaggerate about how China "stole" from them when they just got played in fully legal fashion.
China is many things but the government is plain speaking and honest. It's the citizens who do the infringement. The government will probably keep a careful eye on it to prevent damaging relations with AMD
13 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-07-09
This is a nice post and all, but I'm guessing that the only reason anyone is even arguing about this because these people believe 3D is superior to 2D.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 ineedmorealts 2018-07-09
u/BucDan
Lol wut? China is licensing the IP from the IP owner. That's the opposite of stealing.
Lol wut? Why would they do that? Just because you're obsessed with dear daddy donnie doesn't mean everyone else is. Besides what the fuck could Trump even do? Make some empty "deal" like he did with NK?
u/fluxstate
1) The traffics are retarded
2) China already can and does produce CPU for it's domestic market
3) Producing something that another country won't sell you for a decent price because the leader of that country doesn't understand the basics of international trade isn't a loophole, it's just common sense. No one wants they IT sector to be at the mercy of a rambling fat man who doesn't understand international trade
Lol no you won't. Unless you're going to move to arm chips (many of which are made in china) or just use old ass intel x86 cpus, you'll be giving AMD money
How? How does letting China licensing the IP they need to produce x86-64 cpus hurt America?
Oh my fucking god, these chips are for the CHINESE MARKET. Not the American market. They aren't shipping American jobs anywhere, they're shipping Chinese jobs to China.
Lol. They aren't letting china abuse anything, they're licensing some IP to china. And yea this is what happens when you put retarded tariffs on other countries, they move as much as they can in house, like everyone said they would.
Lol not AMD, intel or China give a shit what you think.
1 watermark02 2018-07-09
A lot of companies have gotten screwed over signing contracts with Chinese companies who quickly abandon the contracts at the first opportunity and take their IP. However really this is the company in questions fault for signing the contract in the first place. Often they go back into the US all butthurt and massively exaggerate about how China "stole" from them when they just got played in fully legal fashion.
1 UmmahSultan 2018-07-09
Yeah it's not really the Chinese company's fault. It's your fault for trusting a Chinese company.
1 Nerdlinger 2018-07-09
LOL. K.
1 aqouta 2018-07-09
What the fuck is an x86-64 cup suposed to mean?
1 ineedmorealts 2018-07-09
A x86-64 cpu is a Central processing unit that uses the x86-64 instruction set
1 aqouta 2018-07-09
I thought we all just called that x86
1 ineedmorealts 2018-07-09
x86 is 23 bit only, x86-64 is 64 bit
1 aqouta 2018-07-09
I thought the whole point of x86 is that it ran both.
1 ineedmorealts 2018-07-09
nope
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-07-09
x86 mean that they are compatible with chip intel 8086. The very first 8086 was 16 bit.
So yes the -64 is needed.
1 none_to_remain 2018-07-09
It's the one AMD came up with that beat Itanium.