Pizzshill and his harem of r/drama foids. The Staceys can't resist this Chad! (FAN ART)

107  2018-07-09 by TheEquimanthorn

75 comments

Khazar milkers

Yummy πŸ˜‹

Providing a Safe Spaceβ„’ from SRD since 2009!

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, archive.is

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

I know there's plenty more r/drama roasties to fit in to a potential image but this was the best I could find so I had to limit it to 4.

Also can someone please tag the depicted people in this thread, I don't know the others well enough to tag them.

u/pizzshill and /u/ed_butteredtoast hope you enjoy this autistic work of art!

U want me to tag u/normie_girl, u/aliceunknown, and u/PowerOfJerkOffMagic? No, I won't, this post is borderline harassment.

Thanks sugar tits πŸ˜‰

Mods! I am being SEXUALLY HARASSED

Bahaha god i hope my bf doesn't see this.

your bf browses drama? lol what a loser !!

Me: No U 😁 Also me: πŸ€”Wait, No Me 😒

i accepted my fat as a loser long ago tho.

You're giving /u/normie_girl way too much credit.

ed

ed always did seem like a chick to me. mainly because he isn't funny even though he tries really hard. also because he posts stupid emoji like a teenage girl. i always figured ed was actually a 15 year old girl.

normie girl is a man tho

Yeah probably true tbh

They're all men that is the joke

Alice's penis is huge

But she does have some nice knockers. I can't remember where I saw them though.

K H A Z A R M I L K I E S

oh sorry I'm autistic

The only man there is Ed, lol.

....and you, presumably ?

Well yeah, I am as well.

It didnt even occur to you

I assumed you were talking about the females in the picture tbh. I assumed it was automatically known I'm male.

females in the picture

where

normie girl, pojom, alice.

Where?

You're just jealous of my enornous wang

Gussies have more nerve endings 😎

The bussy has the most though

Also the most poop tho t b h.

True that's why you always wipe front to back

discusting

Wiping with paper.

Lol not cleaning nice and deeply with water.

To be fair I only have 1 roastie.

lol gay

wtf are you doing posting selfies to /r/braincels?

I'm on a quest to debunk incel science.

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜†πŸ˜‚

You will fail. Miserably. Do not fight the blackpill. It is futile

I think I've personally debunked it considering I pull foids and am mediocre looking.

You're an average looking dude. How tf do you call yourself and incel?

Ok, but in incel science, the only men that can pick up women are chads.

Wtf no. Incels don't say that. Their main gripes are an average looking dude has to put in a shit ton of effort just to attract a boring woman. And women prefer to date much higher than their looksmatch

They constantly spam "this is what is required to date in 2018" and post pics of male models.

Also, almost all of the incel pics I've seen have been "average" looking dudes.

I don't even put in that much effort.

Those average looking people aren't incels.

Then fucking call him out. To be a true incel, you have to max out your looks, and if you can't get any women then only can you call yourself an incel. Keep calling him a lazy volcel until he fixes himself

I mean, you can't understand how people get stuck griping about women?

Not really.

Then why did you do so much of it?

Oh are we playing the "I don't understand satire" game?

So, you never had a crazy ex who made you get a sausage in the middle of the night?

I've had a crazy ex, I just don't care that much.

🀨

maleoids

the blackpill states that women date up in terms of looks. if you're average and you date average women or women who are ugly, that doesn't debunk it. incels also claim that while men who are under 8/10 can get gfs, the girls will cuck them with chad, because girls can fuck up and out of their league easier than men.

debunking the black pill means that you would look ugly or average, and have actual attractive girlfriends. the blackpill is a reaction to the idea that women care more about confidence and personality than men do, and they instead state that women care mostly about looks for sexual and romantic attraction, and that it's easier for a woman to punch up than it is for a man.

The women I date aren't ugly though.

even i believe you, you'd still have to post pics of you with these women to prove it to incels.

am mediocre looking.

Since /u/Board_Gaming felt too threatened by your picture I'm gonna have to ask you to prove your claim here.

Hi, I'm a bot for linking direct images of albums with only 1 image

https://i.imgur.com/ww2xDOB.jpg

Source | Why? | Creator | ignoreme | deletthis

you don't look super ugly, plus this is a bad angle, most people are not looking directly up your nostrils if you talk to them in real life. maybe you're super handsome from a regular angle. not that i believe the blackpill but this doesn't debunk it.

also all the foids you pull could be average and/or ugly.

They aren't ugly lol.

i agree that plenty of incels look average or even some look kinda good looking. some of them are circus freaks though.

but i still don't think your pic debunks the blackpill. only an ugly looking dude pulling hot girls can debunk it. i have no idea how actually attractive the girls you pull are, you could be mostly dating below your league for all we know, which would fall in line with blackpill theories.

I mean, they're attractive. Which is why I bring this up.

there is no way that all incels are attractive. if you're attractive as a dude, you're not incel, it's not even possible. i know because i've always been retarded with women , and grew up with social anxiety. i still lost my virginity at age 20 because a girl saw my pic on my friends phone and said she wanted to hook up with me. other girls at parties threw themselves at me.

if you're attractive, you literally can't be incel, so i don't believe any incel is above a 5/10.

i don't believe in the blackpill , but i do believe people mostly date in their own league. chicks care about looks as much as men, attractive girls usually date attractive guys. but you can be an attractive dude and not be chad, chad is just the most attractive dude that exists, but there are obviously different levels of attractive. you can be a 6-7/10 as a dude, and bang 6s and 7s, but you probably won't fuck 9s and 10s or get relationships with them. it's also obviously easier to fuck/date below your league that within it, or above it.

i just believe people mostly people end up with people around their own level of attractiveness. i don't believe the PUA theories that ugly and average dudes can date models if they have confidence or whatever, since i've never seen a first hand example of that in real life.

so i believe the blackpill is like 50% true. it's true, but incels exaggerate it by a wide margin. if people are used to being able to get partners of a certain level of attractiveness, they usually don't like to "downgrade" by settling for less, so hot chicks are less likely to date completely average dudes. average and ugly people end up dating each other simply because at some point they realise they have to settle or get nothing at all.

so maybe i believe in the brownpill, not quite as intense as the blackpill, but this is what i've observed in reality.

The data incels spam doesn't even line up with this.

Women on dating websites believe 70% of men to be below average, or believe themselves to be too attractive for most men, yet they still contact them anyway.

yes, that stupid study gets posted EVERYTIME this topic comes up.

there are many more studies besides that which one which exist out there, and many of them contradict that study. secondly, it's simply possible that most of the men on okcupid in that particular study were just ugly.

i've seen several studies that show that mostly attractive people end up in relationships together, and people who are ugly/average end up together. it's also what i've observed in reality. also, women find me attractive and say so quite alot, but there is fucking way in hell that i'm top 30% of all men everywhere, so i really doubt that you have to be top 30% for women to find you attractive.

i'm like a 6, 7 at best, and that's good enough for lots of women.

Seems weird these studies you're talking about would conflict with data from multiple dating websites.

what multiple dating websites? i've only seen the okcupid one linked over and over and over and over. never even seen any other dating site studies besides that one.

Tinder for example. Some MGTOW actually did a good video on it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vqRbScCIPU

i still wouldn't use dating sites as a good example because studies have shown that when women have way more options, they get way pickier.

women have thousands of men to choose from on dating sites, so their standards suddenly sky rocket. just because a girl is super picky about who is attractive online, doesn't mean she applies the same standards to me if i was to approach her in a bar.

basically the more options you give people, the more picky they become. it's entirely possible that out in the real world women aren't that picky, but on dating sites when they are looking at 1000 of men's photos, they suddenly are.

still, dating sites =/= real life. keep in mind that also on dating sites women have nothing to judge men on besides photos. studies show that personality traits, posture, body language and various other things influence how attractive women find men, so women could be finding lots of men attractive in real life, but not find those same men attractive if all they have to judge them on are some shitty photos.

this is all fairly complex and dating site studies aren't the be all and end all.

i still wouldn't use dating sites as a good example because studies have shown that when women have way more options, they get way pickier.

I mean, I'd agree if this wasn't 2018. Everyone has access to social media and dating websites.

So women being this picky is the new "norm."

I mean, I'd agree if this wasn't 2018. Everyone has access to social media and dating websites.

yeah they do, but i'm not quite sure how the psychology works. are they just super picky while in the moment and seeing 1000s of different options, then as soon as they log off and they are in a bar with only 30 good looking dudes , suddenly less picky again, or... have those dating apps somewhat permanently warped them? i don't know, i have no evidence either way.

i know that the girls that i've scored with from real life interactions are all pretty hot. my ex was pretty fucking smoking and i didn't meet her on a dating app. the girls i manage to get on dating apps are typical much less attractive, and the hotter girls never give me a chance on there.

but i've been using dating apps exclusively since i broke up with my ex, so i can't compare how hot the girls i can get IRL, to dating app girls. maybe it has permanently fucked the dating scene forever and i no longer have any ability to get girls that hot at all these days, idk.

too many questions left unanswered, but for now, i don't really use dating sites as evidence of dating as a whole. fact is, lots of people still do hook up in clubs and bars, and meet their relationship partners in places other than online, it still happens and it still prevalent.

but wait, i lost track of your point. your original point was that women don't only go for chad, but you're using dating sites as evidence that they literally only find 20-30% of men attractive, which supports the theory that they only go for chad.

i completely am lost as to what your point is now.

also, doesn't all this stuff you've linked support the theory that girls only want chad? i thought you were trying to disprove the blackpill?

The thing I linked says that even though women believe themselves to be too good for most men, they still date them, meaning they date down.

where does it prove that? women almost never send the first message, literally any dating site proves that women get 5000 messages a week if they are hot, while hot men get like 60 tops.

sure, the okcupid study showed that women did send messages to men they didn't think were attractive, but there are two problems with using that to prove that women date down.

one, they didn't control for income of the male. they might have just been messaging the averaging looking dudes who looked wealthy. secondly, women are still receiving 5000% more messages than men.

showing what men women actually responded to and agreed to meet for a date would prove if they date down or not, but the data doesn't show that part, it just shows women messaging men they don't find attractive, but once again, women are still just not sending the first messaging and only responding to messages they get 90% of the time.

where does it prove that? women almost never send the first message, literally any dating site proves that women get 5000 messages a week if they are hot, while hot men get like 60 tops.

Did you not watch the video I linked? Even the cupid data says women are msging guys they believe below them.

like i said from personal experience, mostly only ugly women send the first message, and secondly, most men are spamming messages to 100s of girls and getting 3 responses.

so few women even send a first message that i'm baffled at how you can use that to prove they date down on dating sites.

The image is fucking watermarked

the water mark is of some program that is used with a webcam, do doesn't mean it's fake or not him. it's no different than when you record things using certain programs and it puts an obnoxious logo down the bottom.

Just googled it, I'm a retard

That facial hair doe.

Yeah my facial hair grows retarded after a day or two and I either let it grow out so it looks normal or I shave it.

I shave it 99% of the time.

How old are you?

Those lips 😡😘

Cameroid.com

Lolol

Yeah. Problem?

I legit thought that was a stock photo watermark, guess I lose this one πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

look at those eyes

you really don't sleep

just reddit

I naturally have them. I've been told it's because of allergies.

You look like you need coffee

u/qwep-mi is such a thing possible?

Nope. Debunking the blackpill is impossible. It would be similar to proving water isnt wet. You can avoid the question but you cant prove it wrong.

Debunking the black pill is extremely easy. This is why most people don’t go for it

Why is /u/aliceunknown Ben Shapiro's sister and damn those khazar milkers.

Why do people automatically associate swords with autism? I have a vast sword collection, mostly Asian and Old Norse blades which seem to be the main issues, and I don't understand how this makes me autistic. I'm a virgin, yes, but swords actually make me MORE likely to get laid. I have had countless conversations with cute, cute girls in my classes about the weapons I own. I have been able to speak to women for the first time because they want to know about my Viking Sword, or my latest Bamboo handled Katana. I dream of meeting a girl called Anya so I can say "I own a Katana but I want a cute Anya", that is when I will lose my virginity. But I'm not autistic. I buy these swords to use as often as I can. I have many friends.

It isn't the ownership of the sword that defines the weeb, it is the unironic belief that they could use it if they had to.

All the flavors of roastie and you still went for plain vanilla, smdh.

Nice fo'head Ed

u/aliceunkown is the hottest IRL though

Implying /u/pizzashiII weighs less than 300 lbs

kill whitey

whos the girl 2nd from the left

Abigail Shapiro, Ben Shapiro's hot Jewish sister.

KHAZAR MILKERS