ed always did seem like a chick to me. mainly because he isn't funny even though he tries really hard. also because he posts stupid emoji like a teenage girl. i always figured ed was actually a 15 year old girl.
Wtf no. Incels don't say that. Their main gripes are an average looking dude has to put in a shit ton of effort just to attract a boring woman. And women prefer to date much higher than their looksmatch
Then fucking call him out. To be a true incel, you have to max out your looks, and if you can't get any women then only can you call yourself an incel. Keep calling him a lazy volcel until he fixes himself
the blackpill states that women date up in terms of looks. if you're average and you date average women or women who are ugly, that doesn't debunk it. incels also claim that while men who are under 8/10 can get gfs, the girls will cuck them with chad, because girls can fuck up and out of their league easier than men.
debunking the black pill means that you would look ugly or average, and have actual attractive girlfriends. the blackpill is a reaction to the idea that women care more about confidence and personality than men do, and they instead state that women care mostly about looks for sexual and romantic attraction, and that it's easier for a woman to punch up than it is for a man.
you don't look super ugly, plus this is a bad angle, most people are not looking directly up your nostrils if you talk to them in real life. maybe you're super handsome from a regular angle. not that i believe the blackpill but this doesn't debunk it.
also all the foids you pull could be average and/or ugly.
i agree that plenty of incels look average or even some look kinda good looking. some of them are circus freaks though.
but i still don't think your pic debunks the blackpill. only an ugly looking dude pulling hot girls can debunk it. i have no idea how actually attractive the girls you pull are, you could be mostly dating below your league for all we know, which would fall in line with blackpill theories.
there is no way that all incels are attractive. if you're attractive as a dude, you're not incel, it's not even possible. i know because i've always been retarded with women , and grew up with social anxiety. i still lost my virginity at age 20 because a girl saw my pic on my friends phone and said she wanted to hook up with me. other girls at parties threw themselves at me.
if you're attractive, you literally can't be incel, so i don't believe any incel is above a 5/10.
i don't believe in the blackpill , but i do believe people mostly date in their own league. chicks care about looks as much as men, attractive girls usually date attractive guys. but you can be an attractive dude and not be chad, chad is just the most attractive dude that exists, but there are obviously different levels of attractive. you can be a 6-7/10 as a dude, and bang 6s and 7s, but you probably won't fuck 9s and 10s or get relationships with them. it's also obviously easier to fuck/date below your league that within it, or above it.
i just believe people mostly people end up with people around their own level of attractiveness. i don't believe the PUA theories that ugly and average dudes can date models if they have confidence or whatever, since i've never seen a first hand example of that in real life.
so i believe the blackpill is like 50% true. it's true, but incels exaggerate it by a wide margin. if people are used to being able to get partners of a certain level of attractiveness, they usually don't like to "downgrade" by settling for less, so hot chicks are less likely to date completely average dudes. average and ugly people end up dating each other simply because at some point they realise they have to settle or get nothing at all.
so maybe i believe in the brownpill, not quite as intense as the blackpill, but this is what i've observed in reality.
The data incels spam doesn't even line up with this.
Women on dating websites believe 70% of men to be below average, or believe themselves to be too attractive for most men, yet they still contact them anyway.
yes, that stupid study gets posted EVERYTIME this topic comes up.
there are many more studies besides that which one which exist out there, and many of them contradict that study. secondly, it's simply possible that most of the men on okcupid in that particular study were just ugly.
i've seen several studies that show that mostly attractive people end up in relationships together, and people who are ugly/average end up together. it's also what i've observed in reality. also, women find me attractive and say so quite alot, but there is fucking way in hell that i'm top 30% of all men everywhere, so i really doubt that you have to be top 30% for women to find you attractive.
i'm like a 6, 7 at best, and that's good enough for lots of women.
what multiple dating websites? i've only seen the okcupid one linked over and over and over and over. never even seen any other dating site studies besides that one.
i still wouldn't use dating sites as a good example because studies have shown that when women have way more options, they get way pickier.
women have thousands of men to choose from on dating sites, so their standards suddenly sky rocket. just because a girl is super picky about who is attractive online, doesn't mean she applies the same standards to me if i was to approach her in a bar.
basically the more options you give people, the more picky they become. it's entirely possible that out in the real world women aren't that picky, but on dating sites when they are looking at 1000 of men's photos, they suddenly are.
still, dating sites =/= real life. keep in mind that also on dating sites women have nothing to judge men on besides photos. studies show that personality traits, posture, body language and various other things influence how attractive women find men, so women could be finding lots of men attractive in real life, but not find those same men attractive if all they have to judge them on are some shitty photos.
this is all fairly complex and dating site studies aren't the be all and end all.
I mean, I'd agree if this wasn't 2018. Everyone has access to social media and dating websites.
yeah they do, but i'm not quite sure how the psychology works. are they just super picky while in the moment and seeing 1000s of different options, then as soon as they log off and they are in a bar with only 30 good looking dudes , suddenly less picky again, or... have those dating apps somewhat permanently warped them? i don't know, i have no evidence either way.
i know that the girls that i've scored with from real life interactions are all pretty hot. my ex was pretty fucking smoking and i didn't meet her on a dating app. the girls i manage to get on dating apps are typical much less attractive, and the hotter girls never give me a chance on there.
but i've been using dating apps exclusively since i broke up with my ex, so i can't compare how hot the girls i can get IRL, to dating app girls. maybe it has permanently fucked the dating scene forever and i no longer have any ability to get girls that hot at all these days, idk.
too many questions left unanswered, but for now, i don't really use dating sites as evidence of dating as a whole. fact is, lots of people still do hook up in clubs and bars, and meet their relationship partners in places other than online, it still happens and it still prevalent.
but wait, i lost track of your point. your original point was that women don't only go for chad, but you're using dating sites as evidence that they literally only find 20-30% of men attractive, which supports the theory that they only go for chad.
i completely am lost as to what your point is now.
where does it prove that? women almost never send the first message, literally any dating site proves that women get 5000 messages a week if they are hot, while hot men get like 60 tops.
sure, the okcupid study showed that women did send messages to men they didn't think were attractive, but there are two problems with using that to prove that women date down.
one, they didn't control for income of the male. they might have just been messaging the averaging looking dudes who looked wealthy. secondly, women are still receiving 5000% more messages than men.
showing what men women actually responded to and agreed to meet for a date would prove if they date down or not, but the data doesn't show that part, it just shows women messaging men they don't find attractive, but once again, women are still just not sending the first messaging and only responding to messages they get 90% of the time.
where does it prove that? women almost never send the first message, literally any dating site proves that women get 5000 messages a week if they are hot, while hot men get like 60 tops.
Did you not watch the video I linked? Even the cupid data says women are msging guys they believe below them.
like i said from personal experience, mostly only ugly women send the first message, and secondly, most men are spamming messages to 100s of girls and getting 3 responses.
so few women even send a first message that i'm baffled at how you can use that to prove they date down on dating sites.
the water mark is of some program that is used with a webcam, do doesn't mean it's fake or not him. it's no different than when you record things using certain programs and it puts an obnoxious logo down the bottom.
Why do people automatically associate swords with autism? I have a vast sword collection, mostly Asian and Old Norse blades which seem to be the main issues, and I don't understand how this makes me autistic. I'm a virgin, yes, but swords actually make me MORE likely to get laid. I have had countless conversations with cute, cute girls in my classes about the weapons I own. I have been able to speak to women for the first time because they want to know about my Viking Sword, or my latest Bamboo handled Katana. I dream of meeting a girl called Anya so I can say "I own a Katana but I want a cute Anya", that is when I will lose my virginity. But I'm not autistic. I buy these swords to use as often as I can. I have many friends.
75 comments
1 le_epic_xd 2018-07-09
Yummy π
1 SnapshillBot 2018-07-09
Providing a Safe Spaceβ’ from SRD since 2009!
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 TheEquimanthorn 2018-07-09
I know there's plenty more r/drama roasties to fit in to a potential image but this was the best I could find so I had to limit it to 4.
Also can someone please tag the depicted people in this thread, I don't know the others well enough to tag them.
u/pizzshill and /u/ed_butteredtoast hope you enjoy this autistic work of art!
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-07-09
U want me to tag u/normie_girl, u/aliceunknown, and u/PowerOfJerkOffMagic? No, I won't, this post is borderline harassment.
1 TheEquimanthorn 2018-07-09
Thanks sugar tits π
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-07-09
Mods! I am being SEXUALLY HARASSED
1 normie_girl 2018-07-09
Bahaha god i hope my bf doesn't see this.
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
your bf browses drama? lol what a loser !!
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-07-09
Me: No U π Also me: π€Wait, No Me π’
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
i accepted my fat as a loser long ago tho.
1 ItsSugar 2018-07-09
You're giving /u/normie_girl way too much credit.
1 aqouta 2018-07-09
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-07-09
https://i.imgur.com/aks7kxV.png
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
ed always did seem like a chick to me. mainly because he isn't funny even though he tries really hard. also because he posts stupid emoji like a teenage girl. i always figured ed was actually a 15 year old girl.
1 dramasexual 2018-07-09
normie girl is a man tho
1 TheEquimanthorn 2018-07-09
Yeah probably true tbh
1 mcslibbin 2018-07-09
They're all men that is the joke
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-07-09
Alice's penis is huge
1 alphetasauce 2018-07-09
But she does have some nice knockers. I can't remember where I saw them though.
1 ason 2018-07-09
K H A Z A R M I L K I E S
1 dramasexual 2018-07-09
oh sorry I'm autistic
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
The only man there is Ed, lol.
1 mcslibbin 2018-07-09
....and you, presumably ?
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
Well yeah, I am as well.
1 mcslibbin 2018-07-09
It didnt even occur to you
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
I assumed you were talking about the females in the picture tbh. I assumed it was automatically known I'm male.
1 mcslibbin 2018-07-09
where
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
normie girl, pojom, alice.
1 slimabob 2018-07-09
Where?
1 normie_girl 2018-07-09
You're just jealous of my enornous wang
1 dramasexual 2018-07-09
Gussies have more nerve endings π
1 normie_girl 2018-07-09
The bussy has the most though
1 dramasexual 2018-07-09
Also the most poop tho t b h.
1 normie_girl 2018-07-09
True that's why you always wipe front to back
1 dramasexual 2018-07-09
discusting
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-09
Lol not cleaning nice and deeply with water.
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
To be fair I only have 1 roastie.
1 moudougou 2018-07-09
lol gay
1 parameciidae 2018-07-09
wtf are you doing posting selfies to /r/braincels?
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
I'm on a quest to debunk incel science.
1 parameciidae 2018-07-09
πππ
1 PM-ME-YOUR-UNDERARMS 2018-07-09
You will fail. Miserably. Do not fight the blackpill. It is futile
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
I think I've personally debunked it considering I pull foids and am mediocre looking.
1 PM-ME-YOUR-UNDERARMS 2018-07-09
You're an average looking dude. How tf do you call yourself and incel?
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
Ok, but in incel science, the only men that can pick up women are chads.
1 PM-ME-YOUR-UNDERARMS 2018-07-09
Wtf no. Incels don't say that. Their main gripes are an average looking dude has to put in a shit ton of effort just to attract a boring woman. And women prefer to date much higher than their looksmatch
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
They constantly spam "this is what is required to date in 2018" and post pics of male models.
Also, almost all of the incel pics I've seen have been "average" looking dudes.
I don't even put in that much effort.
1 PM-ME-YOUR-UNDERARMS 2018-07-09
Those average looking people aren't incels.
Then fucking call him out. To be a true incel, you have to max out your looks, and if you can't get any women then only can you call yourself an incel. Keep calling him a lazy volcel until he fixes himself
1 parameciidae 2018-07-09
I mean, you can't understand how people get stuck griping about women?
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
Not really.
1 parameciidae 2018-07-09
Then why did you do so much of it?
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
Oh are we playing the "I don't understand satire" game?
1 parameciidae 2018-07-09
So, you never had a crazy ex who made you get a sausage in the middle of the night?
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
I've had a crazy ex, I just don't care that much.
1 parameciidae 2018-07-09
π€¨
1 shallowm 2018-07-09
maleoids
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
the blackpill states that women date up in terms of looks. if you're average and you date average women or women who are ugly, that doesn't debunk it. incels also claim that while men who are under 8/10 can get gfs, the girls will cuck them with chad, because girls can fuck up and out of their league easier than men.
debunking the black pill means that you would look ugly or average, and have actual attractive girlfriends. the blackpill is a reaction to the idea that women care more about confidence and personality than men do, and they instead state that women care mostly about looks for sexual and romantic attraction, and that it's easier for a woman to punch up than it is for a man.
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
The women I date aren't ugly though.
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
even i believe you, you'd still have to post pics of you with these women to prove it to incels.
1 ItsSugar 2018-07-09
Since /u/Board_Gaming felt too threatened by your picture I'm gonna have to ask you to prove your claim here.
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
https://imgur.com/a/MydILec
1 imguralbumbot 2018-07-09
Hi, I'm a bot for linking direct images of albums with only 1 image
https://i.imgur.com/ww2xDOB.jpg
Source | Why? | Creator | ignoreme | deletthis
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
you don't look super ugly, plus this is a bad angle, most people are not looking directly up your nostrils if you talk to them in real life. maybe you're super handsome from a regular angle. not that i believe the blackpill but this doesn't debunk it.
also all the foids you pull could be average and/or ugly.
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
They aren't ugly lol.
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
i agree that plenty of incels look average or even some look kinda good looking. some of them are circus freaks though.
but i still don't think your pic debunks the blackpill. only an ugly looking dude pulling hot girls can debunk it. i have no idea how actually attractive the girls you pull are, you could be mostly dating below your league for all we know, which would fall in line with blackpill theories.
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
I mean, they're attractive. Which is why I bring this up.
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
there is no way that all incels are attractive. if you're attractive as a dude, you're not incel, it's not even possible. i know because i've always been retarded with women , and grew up with social anxiety. i still lost my virginity at age 20 because a girl saw my pic on my friends phone and said she wanted to hook up with me. other girls at parties threw themselves at me.
if you're attractive, you literally can't be incel, so i don't believe any incel is above a 5/10.
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
i don't believe in the blackpill , but i do believe people mostly date in their own league. chicks care about looks as much as men, attractive girls usually date attractive guys. but you can be an attractive dude and not be chad, chad is just the most attractive dude that exists, but there are obviously different levels of attractive. you can be a 6-7/10 as a dude, and bang 6s and 7s, but you probably won't fuck 9s and 10s or get relationships with them. it's also obviously easier to fuck/date below your league that within it, or above it.
i just believe people mostly people end up with people around their own level of attractiveness. i don't believe the PUA theories that ugly and average dudes can date models if they have confidence or whatever, since i've never seen a first hand example of that in real life.
so i believe the blackpill is like 50% true. it's true, but incels exaggerate it by a wide margin. if people are used to being able to get partners of a certain level of attractiveness, they usually don't like to "downgrade" by settling for less, so hot chicks are less likely to date completely average dudes. average and ugly people end up dating each other simply because at some point they realise they have to settle or get nothing at all.
so maybe i believe in the brownpill, not quite as intense as the blackpill, but this is what i've observed in reality.
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
The data incels spam doesn't even line up with this.
Women on dating websites believe 70% of men to be below average, or believe themselves to be too attractive for most men, yet they still contact them anyway.
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
yes, that stupid study gets posted EVERYTIME this topic comes up.
there are many more studies besides that which one which exist out there, and many of them contradict that study. secondly, it's simply possible that most of the men on okcupid in that particular study were just ugly.
i've seen several studies that show that mostly attractive people end up in relationships together, and people who are ugly/average end up together. it's also what i've observed in reality. also, women find me attractive and say so quite alot, but there is fucking way in hell that i'm top 30% of all men everywhere, so i really doubt that you have to be top 30% for women to find you attractive.
i'm like a 6, 7 at best, and that's good enough for lots of women.
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
Seems weird these studies you're talking about would conflict with data from multiple dating websites.
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
what multiple dating websites? i've only seen the okcupid one linked over and over and over and over. never even seen any other dating site studies besides that one.
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
Tinder for example. Some MGTOW actually did a good video on it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vqRbScCIPU
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
i still wouldn't use dating sites as a good example because studies have shown that when women have way more options, they get way pickier.
women have thousands of men to choose from on dating sites, so their standards suddenly sky rocket. just because a girl is super picky about who is attractive online, doesn't mean she applies the same standards to me if i was to approach her in a bar.
basically the more options you give people, the more picky they become. it's entirely possible that out in the real world women aren't that picky, but on dating sites when they are looking at 1000 of men's photos, they suddenly are.
still, dating sites =/= real life. keep in mind that also on dating sites women have nothing to judge men on besides photos. studies show that personality traits, posture, body language and various other things influence how attractive women find men, so women could be finding lots of men attractive in real life, but not find those same men attractive if all they have to judge them on are some shitty photos.
this is all fairly complex and dating site studies aren't the be all and end all.
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
I mean, I'd agree if this wasn't 2018. Everyone has access to social media and dating websites.
So women being this picky is the new "norm."
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
yeah they do, but i'm not quite sure how the psychology works. are they just super picky while in the moment and seeing 1000s of different options, then as soon as they log off and they are in a bar with only 30 good looking dudes , suddenly less picky again, or... have those dating apps somewhat permanently warped them? i don't know, i have no evidence either way.
i know that the girls that i've scored with from real life interactions are all pretty hot. my ex was pretty fucking smoking and i didn't meet her on a dating app. the girls i manage to get on dating apps are typical much less attractive, and the hotter girls never give me a chance on there.
but i've been using dating apps exclusively since i broke up with my ex, so i can't compare how hot the girls i can get IRL, to dating app girls. maybe it has permanently fucked the dating scene forever and i no longer have any ability to get girls that hot at all these days, idk.
too many questions left unanswered, but for now, i don't really use dating sites as evidence of dating as a whole. fact is, lots of people still do hook up in clubs and bars, and meet their relationship partners in places other than online, it still happens and it still prevalent.
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
but wait, i lost track of your point. your original point was that women don't only go for chad, but you're using dating sites as evidence that they literally only find 20-30% of men attractive, which supports the theory that they only go for chad.
i completely am lost as to what your point is now.
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
also, doesn't all this stuff you've linked support the theory that girls only want chad? i thought you were trying to disprove the blackpill?
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
The thing I linked says that even though women believe themselves to be too good for most men, they still date them, meaning they date down.
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
where does it prove that? women almost never send the first message, literally any dating site proves that women get 5000 messages a week if they are hot, while hot men get like 60 tops.
sure, the okcupid study showed that women did send messages to men they didn't think were attractive, but there are two problems with using that to prove that women date down.
one, they didn't control for income of the male. they might have just been messaging the averaging looking dudes who looked wealthy. secondly, women are still receiving 5000% more messages than men.
showing what men women actually responded to and agreed to meet for a date would prove if they date down or not, but the data doesn't show that part, it just shows women messaging men they don't find attractive, but once again, women are still just not sending the first messaging and only responding to messages they get 90% of the time.
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
Did you not watch the video I linked? Even the cupid data says women are msging guys they believe below them.
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
like i said from personal experience, mostly only ugly women send the first message, and secondly, most men are spamming messages to 100s of girls and getting 3 responses.
so few women even send a first message that i'm baffled at how you can use that to prove they date down on dating sites.
1 uniqueguy263 2018-07-09
The image is fucking watermarked
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-09
the water mark is of some program that is used with a webcam, do doesn't mean it's fake or not him. it's no different than when you record things using certain programs and it puts an obnoxious logo down the bottom.
1 uniqueguy263 2018-07-09
Just googled it, I'm a retard
1 UnoriginalStanger 2018-07-09
That facial hair doe.
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
Yeah my facial hair grows retarded after a day or two and I either let it grow out so it looks normal or I shave it.
I shave it 99% of the time.
1 cuntdestroyer8000 2018-07-09
How old are you?
1 Osterion 2018-07-09
Those lips π΅π
1 uniqueguy263 2018-07-09
Lolol
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
Yeah. Problem?
1 uniqueguy263 2018-07-09
I legit thought that was a stock photo watermark, guess I lose this one π€·ββοΈ
1 eva_unit_hung 2018-07-09
look at those eyes
you really don't sleep
just reddit
1 pizzashill 2018-07-09
I naturally have them. I've been told it's because of allergies.
1 old_grumpy_grandpa 2018-07-09
You look like you need coffee
1 shitpost953 2018-07-09
u/qwep-mi is such a thing possible?
1 qwep-mi 2018-07-09
Nope. Debunking the blackpill is impossible. It would be similar to proving water isnt wet. You can avoid the question but you cant prove it wrong.
1 TheHeroNoOneAskedFor 2018-07-09
Debunking the black pill is extremely easy. This is why most people donβt go for it
1 VidiotGamer 2018-07-09
Why is /u/aliceunknown Ben Shapiro's sister and damn those khazar milkers.
1 GuillotinesNOW 2018-07-09
Why do people automatically associate swords with autism? I have a vast sword collection, mostly Asian and Old Norse blades which seem to be the main issues, and I don't understand how this makes me autistic. I'm a virgin, yes, but swords actually make me MORE likely to get laid. I have had countless conversations with cute, cute girls in my classes about the weapons I own. I have been able to speak to women for the first time because they want to know about my Viking Sword, or my latest Bamboo handled Katana. I dream of meeting a girl called Anya so I can say "I own a Katana but I want a cute Anya", that is when I will lose my virginity. But I'm not autistic. I buy these swords to use as often as I can. I have many friends.
1 KittehDragoon 2018-07-09
It isn't the ownership of the sword that defines the weeb, it is the unironic belief that they could use it if they had to.
1 RichEvansSextape 2018-07-09
All the flavors of roastie and you still went for plain vanilla, smdh.
1 Nopepole 2018-07-09
Nice fo'head Ed
1 Honk4Tits 2018-07-09
u/aliceunkown is the hottest IRL though
1 -Steve_French- 2018-07-09
Implying /u/pizzashiII weighs less than 300 lbs
1 sweetyellowknees 2018-07-09
kill whitey
1 SkaterMan 2018-07-09
whos the girl 2nd from the left
1 AssWizardOfSiberia 2018-07-09
Abigail Shapiro, Ben Shapiro's hot Jewish sister.
1 AssWizardOfSiberia 2018-07-09
KHAZAR MILKERS