You're not fooling anyone, anything remotely critical of markets and capitalism is relentlessly downvoted here. Hillary Clinton shitlibs are right wing too.
A socialist almost won a major party primary for president of the United States. Breathe. Checkmate commies, posted in r/drama! LOL You people are so stupid.
Classic capitalism is doomed to fail as automation increases. The goal of automation is always to lower productions costs by having to employ fewer people, either due to the efficiency of the production process increasing, requiring less supervison or due to machines becoming able to perform tasks that were previously performed by humans.
Long term, this will lead to a reduction in available jobs in all sectors. Historically, due to automation in farming, a lot of jobs in the first sector, resource gathering were lost. Whereas in the 1500s, you would have had to employ dozens of people to farm a field by hand, you're now able to do it with just a couple of people and machines. Similar things happened in the mining industry, etc. although there is was largely counteracted by demand of ores rising, leading to more mining overall happening.
Luckily, a lot of those people were able to move into jobs in the second sector, resource processing. This sector contains the classic factory blue collar jobs. This is the sector that is currently most affected by automation, as lots of tasks previously only possible by humans can now be handled by machines. These machines do not need to exceed or even approach human intelligence, because the tasks performed by the average worker in this sector is - no offense - fairly simplistic. There are currently ongoing efforts to migrate lost jobs in the second sector into the third sector.
The third sector is services. This includes everything from serving food to creating software. Automation is currently not affecting this sector too much, due the average tasks in this sector being too complex for a machine to handle (yet) and due to people largely prefering service industries with direct customer contact to be handled by people. However, advances in AI technology have already replaced jobs in this sector and are likely to continue and culture is shifting to people becoming more acceptable of being serviced by machines instead of humans (i.e. chatbots, ordering on screen) due to it often being more efficient.
The danger here is that a fourth sector has yet to be invented, so there is no place workers in the third sector will be able to migrate due to if large amounts of jobs are lost due to automation. This will also have an effect on businesses of all sectors, as demand is largely determined by how many people are able to afford a product. As more people become unemployed due to automation, demand for products will go down due to more people being unable to afford them. This will overall lower income of corporations.
The only solution to this problem will be to make fundamental changes to our economic system. The system can no longer work if only people who work are wealthy enough to purchase products. Therefore, people will either be given a universal basic income, that will give them enough spending power to keep the economy - and themselves - alive without working or prices of products will drop drastically, to the point where people will be able to afford them without work.
I think it's funny that you think your little r/drama sub is anything to anyone but your stupid little group of followers. I get entertainment out of it.
In Mussolini's government the state held ultimate power over everything, including corporations. In our current government private corporations are above the state, they will not allow anyone unfriendly to their interests to be in power. It's slightly different but the outcome is the same. Hillary has talked about droning whistle blowers and starting wars with major countries. I'd say she's pretty damn similar to Mussolini, but when you're an idiot and you don't know anything you won't realize that.
You don't understand what the corporate state is. Corporations in Fascist corporatism isn't referring to businesses, but incorporated interest-groups of everyone involved in an industry, from the CEOs down to the consumers, similar to a guild system.
You'd know this if you got your knowledge of Fascism from proper sources or basic reading of Fascist literature, instead of the shitposts of communist NEETs on chapo.
What facts did you present? All I see is screeching about legal electioneering activities. Does Hillary have blackshirts? Will she end elections? Restore the Monarch and declare the Monarch an Emperor? Commit some ethnic cleansing in North Africa?
You know that corporatism, fascism, and mercantilism are separate things right?
Fascism is just a system of top down power, typically coming from a dictator. Look up the word. The only difference is the source of absolute power is corporate America and high finance who are above the state.
often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
See where it says often race, meaning not 100% of the time. Exalting nation absolutely without any doubt. Reignighting the cold war, US centered ultra hawkish foreign policy.
62 comments
1 StingAuer 2018-07-17
/u/ShoePidgeon You're either a troll or just a dipshit, either way you need to shut the fuck up.
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
U mad bro?
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-07-17
π΄π΄π΄
1 bG9sIG5pY2UgdHJ5Cg 2018-07-17
Is that room clean yet?
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Have you gotten laid by any lobsters today?
1 bG9sIG5pY2UgdHJ5Cg 2018-07-17
They won't put out. Selfish IMO.
1 ffbtaw 2018-07-17
Sorry, you aren't high enough in the dominance hierarchy. π€·
1 bG9sIG5pY2UgdHJ5Cg 2018-07-17
I polish my carapace regularly and I don't even have any ectoparasites!
1 Wimzer 2018-07-17
Why the fuck didnβt you say βshellfish IMOβ?
1 bG9sIG5pY2UgdHJ5Cg 2018-07-17
I was giving them an obvious opening but they didn't even take a swing at it. Why do I even bother?
1 Bronafide 2018-07-17
/u/ShoePidgeon can be our new /u/prince_kropotkin
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Posted in r/drama, checkmate commies.
1 le_epic_xd 2018-07-17
Is that the best you've got?
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Ouch, I'm so offended, r/drama hurts my feels so bad I don't know what to do about it. I'm utterly broken up inside. yall are mean.
1 dootwiththesickness 2018-07-17
/u/shoepidgeon is definitely obsessed with HRC in a way that only aut-rightists are.
This fucking guy probably thinks Lee Kuan Yew-senpai was a fash as well.
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Posted in r/drama, checkmate commies!
1 dootwiththesickness 2018-07-17
Youβre repeating yourself
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
I know, it bears repeating because of how funny it is that you think anyone would be insulted by your little echo chamber for capitalism.
1 dootwiththesickness 2018-07-17
Iβm genuinely curious. Do you consider Lee Kuan Yew fascist?
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
I don't know much about the politics if Singapore, other than I wouldn't want to prosecuted for chewing gum or forgetting to flush a public toilet.
1 dootwiththesickness 2018-07-17
Well, if you forget to flush a public toilet youβre a disgusting ape whose parents mustβve really fucked up.
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Posted in r/drama, checkmate commie!
1 archdukef4gg0talt 2018-07-17
comeback status: epic
fash status: bashed
to the gulag with me
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
'u should care what my right wing buddies think' ha ha I don't, make as many posts about me as you want. Waste your keystrokes.
1 archdukef4gg0talt 2018-07-17
πππ
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
You're not fooling anyone, anything remotely critical of markets and capitalism is relentlessly downvoted here. Hillary Clinton shitlibs are right wing too.
1 archdukef4gg0talt 2018-07-17
πππ
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
LOL that you think people can't see through your little safe space for capitalism. Enjoy your delusion.
1 archdukef4gg0talt 2018-07-17
LOL that you think you can learn philosophical concepts from the dictionary
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Nooooooo Hilary Clinton is not fash! Fash is racism! LOL
1 archdukef4gg0talt 2018-07-17
πππ
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Emojis! You're a genius, totally good at mocking people. NOT! LOL
1 archdukef4gg0talt 2018-07-17
what's next, take my wife? πππ
maybe the aristocrats? πππ
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
More emojis!
1 archdukef4gg0talt 2018-07-17
πππ
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Emojis again!
1 archdukef4gg0talt 2018-07-17
πππ
1 shitpersonality 2018-07-17
Clean your room!
1 yourdeadwife 2018-07-17
the world?
reality?
anyone with a triple digit iq over the age of 17?
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
There are people who disagree with your views, just not in your echo chamber. Breathe.
1 yourdeadwife 2018-07-17
You sure throw around the word "people" lightly
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
A socialist almost won a major party primary for president of the United States. Breathe. Checkmate commies, posted in r/drama! LOL You people are so stupid.
1 yourdeadwife 2018-07-17
Ted Cruz?
1 suckysucky_5dolla 2018-07-17
should have been bernie
1 bG9sIG5pY2UgdHJ5Cg 2018-07-17
Please share your π¦special juiceπ¦ with me comrade
1 cheeZetoastee 2018-07-17
said the user who is certain that the revolution will work this time.
1 TheRobidog 2018-07-17
Let's test this out:
Classic capitalism is doomed to fail as automation increases. The goal of automation is always to lower productions costs by having to employ fewer people, either due to the efficiency of the production process increasing, requiring less supervison or due to machines becoming able to perform tasks that were previously performed by humans.
Long term, this will lead to a reduction in available jobs in all sectors. Historically, due to automation in farming, a lot of jobs in the first sector, resource gathering were lost. Whereas in the 1500s, you would have had to employ dozens of people to farm a field by hand, you're now able to do it with just a couple of people and machines. Similar things happened in the mining industry, etc. although there is was largely counteracted by demand of ores rising, leading to more mining overall happening.
Luckily, a lot of those people were able to move into jobs in the second sector, resource processing. This sector contains the classic factory blue collar jobs. This is the sector that is currently most affected by automation, as lots of tasks previously only possible by humans can now be handled by machines. These machines do not need to exceed or even approach human intelligence, because the tasks performed by the average worker in this sector is - no offense - fairly simplistic. There are currently ongoing efforts to migrate lost jobs in the second sector into the third sector.
The third sector is services. This includes everything from serving food to creating software. Automation is currently not affecting this sector too much, due the average tasks in this sector being too complex for a machine to handle (yet) and due to people largely prefering service industries with direct customer contact to be handled by people. However, advances in AI technology have already replaced jobs in this sector and are likely to continue and culture is shifting to people becoming more acceptable of being serviced by machines instead of humans (i.e. chatbots, ordering on screen) due to it often being more efficient.
The danger here is that a fourth sector has yet to be invented, so there is no place workers in the third sector will be able to migrate due to if large amounts of jobs are lost due to automation. This will also have an effect on businesses of all sectors, as demand is largely determined by how many people are able to afford a product. As more people become unemployed due to automation, demand for products will go down due to more people being unable to afford them. This will overall lower income of corporations.
The only solution to this problem will be to make fundamental changes to our economic system. The system can no longer work if only people who work are wealthy enough to purchase products. Therefore, people will either be given a universal basic income, that will give them enough spending power to keep the economy - and themselves - alive without working or prices of products will drop drastically, to the point where people will be able to afford them without work.
Downvote away, fellow r/drama users!
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-07-17
π΄π΄π΄
1 TheLordHighExecu 2018-07-17
Even your left-wing buddies think you're wrong. Stop before you unite the political spectrum in making fun of your grasp of political science.
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Sad that so many in CTH defend Hillary Clinton, she is disgusting scum. But hey, a lot of people are weak minded.
1 TheLordHighExecu 2018-07-17
Ahh, you got me for a second. You used to troll /r/neoliberal too, right?
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Yeah I used to mess with those retarded kids.
1 TheLordHighExecu 2018-07-17
Glad you got to spend time with your peers
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Ouch, right in the feels.
1 archdukef4gg0talt 2018-07-17
cth is too right wing if ya ask me
1 DistortedLines 2018-07-17
Oh my god you're still here ππ
1 Agenda_Poster 2018-07-17
Glob me with your commie cummies daddy π¦π
1 diggity_md 2018-07-17
A never ending fountain of tard cum, for our enjoyment
1 saddertadder 2018-07-17
No drama here just an idiot or baitpost
1 archdukef4gg0talt 2018-07-17
πππ
1 TheHeroReditDeserves 2018-07-17
ShoePidgeon just does not learn. People try to help him. They tell him "stop being a lolcow" and he just can not stop.
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
I think it's funny that you think your little r/drama sub is anything to anyone but your stupid little group of followers. I get entertainment out of it.
1 TheHeroReditDeserves 2018-07-17
Better but I can still smell the serious post/salt on that comment. One more layer of irony and you will be right where you need to be.
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
But you posted in r/drama, how could I not be hurt. It's like the ultimate weapon against feels.
1 TheHeroReditDeserves 2018-07-17
Perfect now go find a MDGfugee and let the lolcow become the farmer.
1 cheeZetoastee 2018-07-17
Stuff I don't like is fascism, and the more I don't like it the more fascist it is.
1 ironicshitpostr 2018-07-17
This, but unironically
1 Agenda_Poster 2018-07-17
All whites are fascist got it
1 NardDogAndy 2018-07-17
This confirms my theory that The Big Bang Theory is literally Hitler.
1 grungebot5000 2018-07-17
more like a literal Hitler clone
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Translation, "I don't know anything about fascism so I will make a stupid comment in r/drama, I like pretending"
1 cheeZetoastee 2018-07-17
Said the guy that thinks Hillary is literally Mussolini
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
In Mussolini's government the state held ultimate power over everything, including corporations. In our current government private corporations are above the state, they will not allow anyone unfriendly to their interests to be in power. It's slightly different but the outcome is the same. Hillary has talked about droning whistle blowers and starting wars with major countries. I'd say she's pretty damn similar to Mussolini, but when you're an idiot and you don't know anything you won't realize that.
1 TheLordHighExecu 2018-07-17
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Would you deny that it's a similar setup? A corporate state?
1 People_Reading 2018-07-17
You don't understand what the corporate state is. Corporations in Fascist corporatism isn't referring to businesses, but incorporated interest-groups of everyone involved in an industry, from the CEOs down to the consumers, similar to a guild system.
You'd know this if you got your knowledge of Fascism from proper sources or basic reading of Fascist literature, instead of the shitposts of communist NEETs on chapo.
1 cheeZetoastee 2018-07-17
and yet you call others idiots.
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Glib response with no facts. LOL That's supposed to prove you have half a brain in your head? Try harder shit stain.
1 cheeZetoastee 2018-07-17
What facts did you present? All I see is screeching about legal electioneering activities. Does Hillary have blackshirts? Will she end elections? Restore the Monarch and declare the Monarch an Emperor? Commit some ethnic cleansing in North Africa?
You know that corporatism, fascism, and mercantilism are separate things right?
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
Fascism is just a system of top down power, typically coming from a dictator. Look up the word. The only difference is the source of absolute power is corporate America and high finance who are above the state.
1 cheeZetoastee 2018-07-17
Mirriam-webster disagrees with you.
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
No it doesn't, I read it just last night.
often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
1 cheeZetoastee 2018-07-17
And what part of Hillary's platform had exalting nation and race?
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
See where it says often race, meaning not 100% of the time. Exalting nation absolutely without any doubt. Reignighting the cold war, US centered ultra hawkish foreign policy.
1 cheeZetoastee 2018-07-17
these goalposts are moving so fast not even Vinatieri could score on them.
1 TheRobidog 2018-07-17
So if you take out everything except the nation above individual part, you can argue that Hillary is fascist, got it.
1 rhyme-ocerus 2018-07-17
How old are you?
1 ShoePidgeon 2018-07-17
32
1 lachute18 2018-07-17
jesus christ lmao
1 ThunderCock_Chad 2018-07-17
π΄π΄π΄
1 ObnoxiousFactczecher 2018-07-17
I'm not fond of fashionists either.
1 grungebot5000 2018-07-17
wtf i love CTH now
also they interviewed Mike Reiss so I listened to that and I didnβt wanna kill myself
is CTH actually good?
1 Chronicopia420 2018-07-17
Lol u/shoepidgeon of course you posted this
1 Osterion 2018-07-17
I got into an argument with CTH users yesterday who were defending fascist imperial Japan, so go figure.