I think there is a resurgence of anti-MDEgeneracy because at this point in time /r/Drama has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. /r/Drama is not going to be the radical centrists they once were in the last century. MDEgenerates are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for /r/Drama to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and MDEgenerates will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, /r/Drama will not survive.
Srsly, the dude went into the ghetto of this city (can't remember it's name), then sat on the sidewalk shouting racist epithets at passerbys wearing a Nazi armband. Like what were you expecting bro?
50 years ago he would've gotten a lot worse than that.
I don't know. But usually when people wander around the streets muttering crazy shit at random people (showing total disregard for their own safety) it's because they're schizophrenic. Or otherwise mentally ill.
No u is not a rebuttal.
It's not "no u" at all. I'm just pointing out how perhaps you've made a mistake by characterizing this race as "tough but fair" as opposed to just uninhibited in violence.
That's an amazingly retarded webpage. You're seriously arguing that logical fallacies aren't a thing.
The most troubling aspect of logical fallacies is their use in suppressing uncomfortable ideas and viewpoints, and this can happen whether they are invoked correctly or not.
Also, it's common knowledge that your mom's a slut. I won't post proof because it's common knowledge.
You're only able to write this, and to imagine that it is making a point, because you implicitly rely on the common knowledge that you don't (wouldn't) even know who my mom is. That has to be already known, for your smug attempt at a point to make any sense.
So you see, you can't make any kind of point without relying on common knowledge. It's impossible.
Therefore idiots like you can always demand proof of things -- there will always be something to play dumb about -- and think you're making a point. Meanwhile, you're actually just saying dumb things in public. Real clever!
You already do know it's true though. You wouldn't say something like "dindu stats" if you weren't already familiar.
you have to back it up with evidence
That's not the way the world works. You asked for proof in a rude way, that indicated you wouldn't listen, and even that you're familiar with the information.
There is no way that I would ever show you evidence of anything if you asked like that, unless you first apologized. The fact that you already know is not even the only reason I don't satisfy your request.
Anyone who knows what kind of retarded statistics I use must agree with me.
See, there you go.
However, I'm not familliar with the particular retarded stats u use, and therefore need you give your evidence so I can refute it. Elsewise nod ebate can take place.
You keep using that word... you don't seem to understand what it means.
Is asking retards online to mind your hurt feelings not fragillity?
Is asking retards online to mind your hurt feelings not fragillity?
Asking for things does sound fragile. Telling people you won't do what they ask is quite different.
Man, you need basic shit explained to you a lot. Do you think it's clever to be stupid in this way all the fucking time? I don't get it. Are you legitimately incapable of making this kind of distinction?
I'm not familliar with the particular retarded stats u use, and therefore need you give your evidence so I can refute it. Elsewise nod ebate can take place.
There's no need to debate the fact that niggers are more violent than whites. It is a well-known fact. I can show you a video where the nigger-in-chief Obama himself acknowledges the fact. It is common knowledge.
The only argument to be had is over why the niggers are so violent. Is it their genes? Is it because they are so oppressed by white supremacy? Is it dey culta?
In the context of this thread it doesn't matter because I didn't rely on why they're more violent, only that they're more violent.
You don’t have to have a college degree to serve. You don’t have to make your subject and verb agree to serve. You only need a heart full of grace. A soul generated by love.
What do you think it means to say that they're more violent?
I think it means that black people are intrinsically more violent than whites, independent of environmental factors, which is not synonymous with higher rates of violent crime.
I think it means that black people are intrinsically more violent than whites, independent of environmental factors,
LOL "more violent" doesn't mean "intrinsically more violent," that's why you need to add the word "intrinsically."
You literally used the phrase "more violent" within your definition of "more violent," and just added a bunch of conditionals to it.
Blacks are more violent means that they are more violent, like if you're in a situation where you're trusting a black guy not to be violent, that's more dangerous than a situation where you're trusting a white guy not to be violent. Which is what we were talking about.
"OMG not intrinsic though!" has absolutely no relevance to that situation. It has no relevance to this context.
If you didn't mean intrinsically more violent (which is what you were implying), then what's the point? You might as well say that poor people are more violent, or that men are more violent; technically true but it means jack shit.
OMFG you forgot what this conversation was about? Really?
I was pointing out how the guy in the video made the fatal mistake of trusting a nog not to chimp out. Look how he holds out his hand, as if to reason with the beast. He is clearly lacking in appropriate caution, he should already be on guard when in such close proximity to that thing.
95 comments
1 kippot 2018-07-17
Inb4 mayo fragility
1 TheEquimanthorn 2018-07-17
Videos like this keep MDEfugees in the confines of their own home when it comes to LARPing, and that's a good thing.
1 EasySchmitty 2018-07-17
Disgusting. /r/drama must remain radical centrist, which means turning away MDEgenerates and Chapo babbies.
1 Boring_normie 2018-07-17
The MDE influx is the greater problem, so allying with Chapo momentarily to drive out the MDE incels makes sense doesn't it?
1 EasySchmitty 2018-07-17
Then you get an influx of Chapofugees. There’s already been at least two or three shitting up threads with seriousposts along with the DDF.
1 rationalhuckleberry 2018-07-17
Fuck that. No CTH, no MDE.
Out out out with them all.
1 somegurk 2018-07-17
A few are fine but only the most bountiful.
1 Boring_normie 2018-07-17
Four of our mods are regulars there.
1 Yiin 2018-07-17
name names
1 Boring_normie 2018-07-17
pimm, shitpost, donnius, serial
1 Yiin 2018-07-17
They're the good type of commie from what I've seen
1 cat--facts 2018-07-17
Did you know? Approximately 40,000 people are bitten by cats in the U.S. annually.
u/Yiin, you subscribed here. To unsubscribe from cat--facts reply, "!cancel".
Not subscribed? Reply "!meow" to start your subscription!
1 shitpost953 2018-07-17
I really only go there when there are threads about them
1 shallowm 2018-07-17
imo we should just get DP'ed by both
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-07-17
Ed's alt and Ed are commie scum, didn't you know?
1 kippot 2018-07-17
/u/captainpriapism stop posting on ur alt
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-07-17
K Ed
1 kippot 2018-07-17
Rent free /u/ed_butteredtoast
1 lolyougotreallymad 2018-07-17
You talk about your male friend an awful lot.
How do you pay the rent?
😘🍆💦🤤
1 DistortedLines 2018-07-17
OUT OUT OUT
1 jaja10 2018-07-17
(((allying with chapo)))
1 Boring_normie 2018-07-17
But chapo hates israel!
1 jaja10 2018-07-17
you aren't thinking woke enough. Israel is merely a distraction, while the real work is carried out from within. trust me this is totally correct
1 Matthew94 2018-07-17
End yourself.
1 EarnestNoMeta 2018-07-17
nah bish
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-17
Yeah, we get it, you're totally centrist.
1 kippot 2018-07-17
Your opinions are worth nothing, mdegenerate
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-17
Fuck off retard jew
1 kippot 2018-07-17
Hey now, your veil is dropping 😉
1 RichEvansSextape 2018-07-17
Wanting to turn away homegrown drama milk makes you part of the problem.
1 I_DRINK_TO_FORGET 2018-07-17
But it isn't home grown. Its imported, fake, and full of soy.
1 Mikeavelli 2018-07-17
No...
Let them fight.
1 better_bot 2018-07-17
He moved on him like a bitch.
1 I_live_in_a_trashcan 2018-07-17
I’m sure that’ll help change that guys opinion /s
1 Fr33_Lax 2018-07-17
Well it'll certainly change his opinion about dressing up like a nazi.
1 Strictlybutters 2018-07-17
https://m.imgur.com/t/funny/CoWZ05t
1 jaja10 2018-07-17
blumpf supporters RESIGNED 😂 😂 😂
1 DistortedLines 2018-07-17
Scared whyboi?
1 jaja10 2018-07-17
😂
1 BeerusandChampa4ever 2018-07-17
It's wypipo. Get your nomenclature correct, mayo.
1 ihaztacos 2018-07-17
BOOM HEADSHOT !
1 UniverseInH 2018-07-17
White dude committing a hate crime and black dude committing a regular crime. Why is this supposed to be exciting, again?
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-17
Par for the course
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2018-07-17
Howdy!
1 Soundfat 2018-07-17
Alright now somebody post the video of Kekzilla sleeping that limp wristed Antifag
1 Magehunter_Skassi 2018-07-17
I think there is a resurgence of anti-MDEgeneracy because at this point in time /r/Drama has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. /r/Drama is not going to be the radical centrists they once were in the last century. MDEgenerates are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for /r/Drama to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and MDEgenerates will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, /r/Drama will not survive.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
This is what happens when you trust blacks to stay calm and peaceful.
1 watermark02 2018-07-17
Srsly, the dude went into the ghetto of this city (can't remember it's name), then sat on the sidewalk shouting racist epithets at passerbys wearing a Nazi armband. Like what were you expecting bro?
50 years ago he would've gotten a lot worse than that.
1 TransexualWiener 2018-07-17
that mother fucker never saw die hard 3.
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-17
I miss the 90's when black and white protagonists would come together to disrespect women.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
Obviously he's some mental case. Of course I expect the chimpout, what I'm saying is that he didn't, and that was his fatal mistake.
1 BeerusandChampa4ever 2018-07-17
So black people are so fragile words trigger them into violence?
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
Talk shit get hit.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
Guy was probably a literal schizophrenic with no idea what is going on around him.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
How do you know?
No u is not a rebuttal.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
I don't know. But usually when people wander around the streets muttering crazy shit at random people (showing total disregard for their own safety) it's because they're schizophrenic. Or otherwise mentally ill.
It's not "no u" at all. I'm just pointing out how perhaps you've made a mistake by characterizing this race as "tough but fair" as opposed to just uninhibited in violence.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
Knocking out someone nattering at u isn't a race thing, it's a human thing.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
Crime statistics show otherwise.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
Post DINDU STATS pls.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
You can look it up yourself.
Of course, those statistics only confirm what every person who interacts with them can observe directly.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
Lol le rational alt righter going "educate yourself".
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
No, like I said, you already know. You've already seen this data. It's common knowledge.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
Lol le personal disbelief fallacy. Post stats or fuck off.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
I'm talking about you, not talking about my own beliefs.
Also, you don't understand what a fallacy even is.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
Lol. "Everyone knows that" isn't an argument, m8. Personal incredulity fallacy, m8.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
Exactly. That's why it can't be a fallacy.
You really need to learn what a fallacy is.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
A fallacy is any non sequitur.
Saying an argument is wrong because you personally don't believe it is a non sequitur.
Stop trying to look rational and intellectual, m8.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
Quite right.
I didn't say that, of course.
Here, read this: https://laurencetennant.com/bonds/bdksucks.html
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
That's an amazingly retarded webpage. You're seriously arguing that logical fallacies aren't a thing.
Like imagine being this fragile.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
That's not what it's arguing.
Here read this one: https://laurencetennant.com/bonds/adhominem.html
(It explains what is ad hominem as well as what isn't.)
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
That is exactly what its arguing. Its arguing that logical fallacies don't matter, and its wrong to dismiss arguments because they're fallacious.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
I never claimed to have presented any evidence. I even went so far as to explain why I didn't. That's why it's not a fallacy.
You should read the link and learn, then you wouldn't keep on saying stupid shit for the rest of your life.
https://laurencetennant.com/bonds/adhominem.html
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
Amazing.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
No. We've seen this shit already. It's common knowledge.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
So, you're claiming that your argument is correct because of common knowledge? that's a textbook case of personal incredulity fallacy.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
Nope. I'm claiming that the reason I won't post it is that it's common knowledge.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
Kay, so your claims have no evidence. Goodbye.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
Alright I'm about to blow your mind here.
You're only able to write this, and to imagine that it is making a point, because you implicitly rely on the common knowledge that you don't (wouldn't) even know who my mom is. That has to be already known, for your smug attempt at a point to make any sense.
So you see, you can't make any kind of point without relying on common knowledge. It's impossible.
Therefore idiots like you can always demand proof of things -- there will always be something to play dumb about -- and think you're making a point. Meanwhile, you're actually just saying dumb things in public. Real clever!
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
Things accepted by both involved parties can be treated as common knowledge.
However, when you make a claim like "Blacks are more predisposed to crime", you have to back it up with evidence.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
You already do know it's true though. You wouldn't say something like "dindu stats" if you weren't already familiar.
That's not the way the world works. You asked for proof in a rude way, that indicated you wouldn't listen, and even that you're familiar with the information.
There is no way that I would ever show you evidence of anything if you asked like that, unless you first apologized. The fact that you already know is not even the only reason I don't satisfy your request.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
If I did I wouldn't be asking u to prove it.
I'm familliar with the retarded stats people use; I just want to know which particular retarded stats u use so I can refute them properly.
Imagine being this fragile.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
I don't believe that.
See, there you go.
You keep using that word... you don't seem to understand what it means.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
However, I'm not familliar with the particular retarded stats u use, and therefore need you give your evidence so I can refute it. Elsewise nod ebate can take place.
Is asking retards online to mind your hurt feelings not fragillity?
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
Asking for things does sound fragile. Telling people you won't do what they ask is quite different.
Man, you need basic shit explained to you a lot. Do you think it's clever to be stupid in this way all the fucking time? I don't get it. Are you legitimately incapable of making this kind of distinction?
There's no need to debate the fact that niggers are more violent than whites. It is a well-known fact. I can show you a video where the nigger-in-chief Obama himself acknowledges the fact. It is common knowledge.
The only argument to be had is over why the niggers are so violent. Is it their genes? Is it because they are so oppressed by white supremacy? Is it dey culta?
In the context of this thread it doesn't matter because I didn't rely on why they're more violent, only that they're more violent.
YOU ALREADY KNOW THEY ARE MORE VIOLENT.
1 MLK-Junior 2018-07-17
You don’t have to have a college degree to serve. You don’t have to make your subject and verb agree to serve. You only need a heart full of grace. A soul generated by love.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
Lol mayo fragility.
Retard, your claim was that blacks are more predisposed to violence, not that blacks have higher crime rates.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
They have higher rates of violent crime. They're more violent.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
Aha, ambiguous terminology.
What do you think it means to say that they're more violent?
I think it means that black people are intrinsically more violent than whites, independent of environmental factors, which is not synonymous with higher rates of violent crime.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
LOL "more violent" doesn't mean "intrinsically more violent," that's why you need to add the word "intrinsically."
You literally used the phrase "more violent" within your definition of "more violent," and just added a bunch of conditionals to it.
Blacks are more violent means that they are more violent, like if you're in a situation where you're trusting a black guy not to be violent, that's more dangerous than a situation where you're trusting a white guy not to be violent. Which is what we were talking about.
"OMG not intrinsic though!" has absolutely no relevance to that situation. It has no relevance to this context.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
If you didn't mean intrinsically more violent (which is what you were implying), then what's the point? You might as well say that poor people are more violent, or that men are more violent; technically true but it means jack shit.
1 MelissaClick 2018-07-17
OMFG you forgot what this conversation was about? Really?
I was pointing out how the guy in the video made the fatal mistake of trusting a nog not to chimp out. Look how he holds out his hand, as if to reason with the beast. He is clearly lacking in appropriate caution, he should already be on guard when in such close proximity to that thing.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
Lol wure fragile af.
1 BeerusandChampa4ever 2018-07-17
They weren't the one triggered to violence over words
1 BeerusandChampa4ever 2018-07-17
Black people were just rioting in Chicago over a black guy getting shot after trying to draw a gun on cops.
Who is fragile?
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-07-17
Who is upset over a Reddit comment?
1 RockyCoon 2018-07-17
We should build a wall to keep them out.
1 COMMUNIST_WARRIOR 2018-07-17
this but unironically and in real life but non-violently
1 DistortedLines 2018-07-17
lol MDE fragility
1 BeerusandChampa4ever 2018-07-17
Or people tried of this Tumblr bullshit
1 Onarde135 2018-07-17
Don't get banned now. Some might see this as inciting violence. 😳
1 watermark02 2018-07-17
This was not in the least bit justified and should not be tolerated in any free society. Now that that's through...
sigh unzips
1 myshl0ng 2018-07-17
My borders are open. MDE is welcome. Get used to it, bigots.
1 kippot 2018-07-17
You need to go back
1 myshl0ng 2018-07-17
I'm a reddit citizen. No borders.
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2018-07-17
I just realized. Antifags wouldn't be so bad at bashing fash if they weren't all mayos.