Well after knowing about her past actions he still dated her and more...so even though law likes these are outdated to a point in modern USA...he is a retarded doll, because he knew all about her.
he did just date her you numpty, he was engaged to her and had 2 kids. He was the one that cancelled the wedding and tossed them all out of his house so he could go bang models.
She was never married. She had a kid with Matt Leinart at the end of college right as he got drafted to the Cardinals. She got waaaaay less in child support from him than blake, it was 15k a month.
Well he's made like 60+ mil over his football career so I think he can afford the 3.5 mil total child support he will pay over the 18 years his kid is growing up
Lol I guess Blake is now happy that he isn't younger, because when he retires 3 years from now he will be able to ask for a downgrade...still, in current state, 55 million in 18 years...those are some rich kids...and boy, Kardashian's are some expensive ladies.
It's 3 mil a year, dude makes 35 mil a year. The reason these laws exist are to provide consequences for people like Blake Griffin who kicked his fiance and kids out his house on a whim so he could bang Kendell Jenner. This isn't some case of some bullshit alimony decision, dude tossed his family out of his house to bang some young pussy. Fuck him
And he doesn't need 35 million a year. She had a substantial part in giving the freedom to pursue his career choice (wiping not only his ass, but also the asses of his two children while he's tired from playing sperts). The money she's receiving is a pittance compared to what he will earn throughout his lifetime.
I’m not sure if you’re trolling or if I am missing some sarcasm. Over the next generation the number of mixed race marriages will increase in North America dramatically and the average skin complexion will become a little darker. That doesn’t bother me at all. My children are mixed race so they will grow up in a less divided world than we have now.
Nobody will replace me, I will get old and die. When I die, the country I live in (Canada) will be more multicultural than the country I was born in. I like that. I like Canada’s position on immigration and I think we also need to increase our population to over 100 million to be better positioned to deal with the whims of our southern neighbour on things like trade. The best and probably only way of getting to that number is immigration.
So much for freedom. He should be allowed to bang some young pussy if he wants without being fined. He should give her enough to support the kids not so she can just sit on her ass all day
he still has the freedom to do what he wants, freedom doesn't mean you have 0 responsibility. He had the freedom to not propose and have kids with this woman. He also had the freedom to turn down Kendell Jenner hoe'ing, act like a man, and take care of his family. If you fail at your societal responsibilities there are consequences. This isn't some case of some instagram hoe winning the jackpot, this fuck up is all on Blake
Are you a teenager? Do you know what proportional means? It is proportional, the kids are getting less than 10% of what he makes every year. Most people who walk out on their family actually end up paying a much higher % of their wage to child support
Damn you have a goldfish brain. I thought you were all for a proportional system 2 posts ago? I wouldn't worry about it too much my little friend, you will never make the kind of money that lands child support payments like this, nor will you ever get your dick touched. I wouldn't stress on it too much
Are you getting angry because people see how corrupt this system is. All it does is enable women to be lazy greedy and selfish. And of course I won't make 30 million a year is that meant to be an insult?Don't worry you'll never marry a man that makes that much so when your man does cheat on you I'm guessing you'll find another way to fleece him
Well since i'm a straight man that's married, yes I agree I will not marry a man that makes that much. I'm only getting bothered cause you fucking idiots see a big ass number, get yourselves all worked up in a tizzy, and never actually educate yourselves on the situation or the laws behind it.
They didnt get married though. That's like punishing someone for breaking a contract they planned on signing but never did. You have to be insane or a golddigger to think 238k a month is fair
Do you realize that child support and alimony are 2 different things right? You don't suddenly get to abandon your kids because you didn't get married...
The headline made me angry at first, but then I read up on the case and she honestly made a substantial amount of sacrifices in order to facilitate his career choice and then he throws it away first chance he gets to chase an instagram thot. Tbh the ex-wife deserves every single dollar.
I love how you're all up in a tizzy about someone paying child support for their kids here and then will turn around and go rant about "lazy dead beat black fathers" in your little MDE circlejerk
That's not how any of this works. If she was the one cheating on him she'd still get the kids and the child support.
The loophole is that the more kids you have the smaller the share of child support per kid. If Blake really wants to stick it to his first baby mama, he should go around impregnating every random girl until he has 100 kids and his first baby mama is going getting 2% of the child support.
Yeah sure the courts are going to give custody to the man with a career and not the mom who already stayed home with the kids for their early years, because of alleged cheating he probably couldn't even prove.
Of course some men think they can game the system by getting custody, avoiding child support and instead hiring 10 full time nannies (still way cheaper than the child support Blake has to pay). Then the courts screw them over and they become embittered r/mensrights posters.
They're supposed to be enough money to support the child, and perhaps the parent in the capacity that they might need to hire babysitters/etc since they might not be a stay at home parent.
They're absolutely not supposed to be punitive. Furthermore, he didn't even marry this woman.
I know he didn't marry her, that's why he is not paying alimony. Currently the law is a % of the non-custodial parent's income. The logic is that now that the kid is missing out on life with said parent, they should not be punished for this and miss out on the resources of the parent.
lol not having $258,000 a months spent on you is punishment? He should be required by law to be there at all times for the child too, because the child's being punished and missing out on the love and attention of a parent. God forbid a child experience change in their lifetime.
No they are not, they are a consequence of having kids and not being in a relationship with the other parent of the child/children. For someone that’s so preachy about others being educated you really don’t know what you are talking about. She could have walked out on him and he would still be paying child support.
Child support is not punitive, it is to support the children financially.
Is that 8500 a year? If so that's hilariously fucked up. Costs a hell of a lot more than that to raise a kid if you want to give them a decent life. Not that I would expect anything less from Texas
If it is anything like Brendan Fraser, then this guy is fucked. To this day, Brendan Fraser (who has not had any film role for years now) is still ordered to pay 50K per month in alimony to his ex. Most people in the U.S. don't even make 50K per year.
Canada is fucked too. Dave Foley owes 17k a month in child support because he was doing NewsRadio at the time, but now he's not. Don't think k he can really go back because they'll arrest him.
Ah the Kids in the Hall guy right? I remember seeing some videos with him talking about it in interviews. How the court just would not hear it and wouldn't get it reduced. I always liked that dude so it sucked to hear.
no not really. this ain't 1900, anybody can get a job. maybe it makes sense in the scenario where one parent has been out of the workforce for 20 years and can't get a job to continue their livestyle, but that's frankly as uncommon these days as being rich is.
Like 30%of American mother's are still SAHMs. Yes they can get a job, but their earning potential has been permanently impacted if they've spent any notable amount of time out of the work force. Courts base the duration and income from alimony on these factors.
the general intent of spousal support is to enable the receiver to transition from married to single without getting stuck in the poor house. i'm fine with that to be honest, except in cases where the receiver is capable of working and making a decent life for themselves, and isn't doing so. that happens, a lot, and almost always the wife.
duration of spousal is a weird thing, and does differ state by state. in CA, if you've been married less than 10 years, it's half the length of the marriage. if over 10 years, it's unlimited, unless financial situations change (get a good job, marry a rich person, etc.). unlimited spousal is bad, though at least it's tax deductable for the giver.
also in California, the amount is determined by Dissomaster ( algorithm) unless you fall into some fairly rare categories, like being stinking rich. you can diverge from the calculated amounts, but they're really the way it goes for most people.
sounds about right to me. that should be long enough for anyone to get their shit together. then again you do have to live in Tejas, which is its own punishment.
Did the court use your current wage as assitant fries manager, or do they look at your potential earnings as assistant night manager when they decided how much your boyfriend pays?
they used my salary at separation date, yes. "potential earnings" -- what you're referring to here is imputing earnings, which the court can do in situations where, say, someone takes a $20k job to try to avoid spousal/child support (where they were previously making $150k a year or something). When under a spousal/child support order, having your income drop is a bad thing, as the instant suspicion is that you're trying to lower your income in order to lower the total $$ of your order.
tbh i wished i had made minimum wage, fuckin support order would have been like a hundred bucks a month. the actual one was much, much larger -- but all gone now!
nah they aged out. unlike shitholes like Oregon, California only stipulate support until 18 (or 19 if they're still in high school or something). Oregon requires till they reach 21, which is insane and ridiculous, but that's Oregon for you.
lol 3 years of law school it took to teach you that basic truth? sheesh you millennials have surely slipped
see my other post about "female attorney / female judge" -- best advice I can give. besides catching your ex in financial malfeasance, that's useful too (trust me, i know)
The psychology of gender as it relates to bias and favorability from judges in family law cases in highly complex. A female judge may be more likely to award lower maintenance in general, but may also be less sympathetic to an individual defendant. And vice versa. It is much more beneficial to track the individual judge's record.
Same with the lawyer, except much more so since competence, skill and experience far outweighs minor issues of whether the judge likes your lawyer.
At least that's what my profs told me. I wasn't exactly editor of the law review so take anything i say with a massive grain of salt.
yeah i mean that's all basic human psychology stuff really. and yeah it's totally complex -- you can have a shit day in court just because the judge missed her coffee that morning, or because he got into a fight with his wife last night. or was up snorting lines until 20 mins before court.
the worst is a family court judge, new to the bench, who is out to be a crusader and protect the poor, poor womenfolk. that's when you're fucked.
Appeals are a thing. If the judge is absolutely a shit heel, a competent lawyer will preserve the record for appeal and then get another, higher, judge to curtail the stupidity.
dammit i wrote this nice, informational response, and then hit some fucking button and poof! there it went into the ether
summary though (since i'm entirely too lazy to type out anything approximating what I did before):
appeals are all fine and dandy except:
Most family court litigants are pro se and those guys are a bunch of insane fuckups who always miss deadlines and file objections like "Judge X was raciss! I wanna new trial!" -- deadline for filing a family court appeal in california is 60 days from the date of final judgement I do believe
You are not guaranteed an appeal, regardless of the quality of your objection, and most appeals fail. The success rate, I've been told by family court attorneys in California, is usually around 5%. if you're pro se, it's effectively zero.
Appeals are time-consuming (1-2 years), expensive, and harrowing, meaning most people won't or can't deal with them
Even if you do get an appeal, your chances are not that good. i mean if you got something really egregious, like serious procedural violations or malfeasance or the judge called you a "worthless wetback bastard" from the bench, yeah maybe. If it's just that they disliked your sorry ass and that influenced (silently) their finding for the other party, within the guidelines, yeah no. so unless you have some actual beef about something like admissability of evidence, or obvious procedural errors, you're out of luck.
Plus, anything that annoys a judge can fuck your case in a heartbeat -- I've seen it happen. Interrupting the judge, staring at him, cursing in open court, asking dumbshit questions like "have you read my brief, your honor?" etc. all these things can, and will contribute to the verdict, regardless of what's in the transcript.
And of course having a good attorney comes into it, that's so simple it should never even be mentioned. My first family law attorney, when i started talking to them, was like $150 an hour. I quickly switched to a $450/hr guy and it was night and fucking day.
Agreed to all of that. My point is simply that as a litigant in family court instead of picking whichever female lawyer looks nice, and praying for a female judge, you are probably better off finding the most competent and experienced lawyer you can afford; who will presumably know which judge isn't a scumbag.
258k per month until the kid hits 18 years old. Damn, I've not seen a guy get fucked this hard by family court since Brendan Frasier.
This is why some rich guys get vasectomies and prenuptial agreements before they stick their dick in those hoes. I bet this guy is wishing he had worn a rubber instead of going in raw. That pussy ain't worth 258k per month.
I think she's got another baby from an NFL player she gets child support from. If so that's just impressive hustle. Probably makes more than the other guy at this point.
Child support goes directly to the parent with more custody. The court doesn't hand a check to a six year old, and it also doesn't enforce rules on how that money is spent.
I wouldn't really mind this if women were required to prove it was spent on the children or if the father was able to spend the money on housing, food, clothes, education and toys/entertainment for the children himself. But you can guarantee the $258K a month is not going all to the kids. They will end up with a small portion of that.
Just remove the "women" part. Why can't we require any government mandated funds to be allocated and audited. If the government gives out welfare, people who receive it should easily be able to show how they spent it, and Mother's and Ex Wives receiving alimony should be held to that standard as well.
If you get X amount to spend on the Child, you should be forbidden from spending it on yourself.
depends on the state I would assume, but at least in California there is no man/woman stipulation about who gets paid. it's based on a calculator (well for us normal people at least) which isn't sex-based, but rather income based.
that being said, of course there's still discrimination against men in the courts. protip: get a female lawyer, get a female judge if you're . a man. they're much less likely to get all "awwwww a girl here have some money sweetie" than men are.
I was talking about this specific case IDK why I said women instead of the woman, but now it's properly gender neutralized. Though in general it's still going to be the women who get the children.
Oh a creepy stalker mra is crying that men have to pay child support. Virgincel fools lol. So you can’t do math dummy? Is it your tiny balls that make you incapable of understanding? Haha loser.
What? Speak English idiot. Are you seriously trying to say use cats like some 90’s era stereotype of women? No you aren’t an mra at all lol. How old are you 60? Stfu gray pube fool.
Grindr is for men you dumb soybrained loser. You are more POC than me? Lol. Is it a contest? Hilarious. Lesbians fuck a lot don’t you know, why you are so scared of us? Cause you are too fat to catch any woman so you can rape her, I’m sure you’ll just keep jacking ur tiny button to gay for pay porn accounts. Maybe try grindr, I hear male on male sex is fun. Try it beta bottom.
Grindr is gender inclusive you twat..and even if it's for men..you look like one so it's your only choice to get laid...but you won't - gay men have standarts.
Keep lying to yourself - you are out of shape and you haven't seen even your own pussy since 9/11.
And is that😡 supposed😡😡😡 to be an insult😳???😂😂?😤?😒 Just FYI, I'm 6'2🙂🤔🤔, 195 lbs, 10% body fat.😐😐😐 Broad shoulders💪💪, very defined😳, powerful 😤😤back 💦😏😏😏(deadlift PR of 505 lbs), chest hair🐒🐒, full thick💦💦🍆 beard,😱😱 veiny 🍆forearms💪💪🍆🍆, protruding 😁😁and defined jawline😵😱😳😳, and the majority of my 😝wardrobe is made up of dress shirts. 🎩 😎 👞👞.
I'm an Instagram girl's 👧👧😏😏wet dream💦💦, and I still turn that shit down since I have better options throwing themselves at me😏😏😏 nearly every time I💪💪💪😂😂🍆💦💦 go out in public.😎😎
You going to announce to GC that men should pay a reasonable percentage of child support to earnings ratio and peepee pants men get mad when you point that out? Haha yeah try that, link me tho, it will be hilarious.
Yes ma’am I linked the whole thread. It’s really funny how triggered all the soyboys are. And I looked back at it, it was you. I’d love it if they tried to retaliate b/c I hurt the man feelz of troll men mad that paying less than 10% of your yearly salary makes men cry. Not sure what you mean by they hate me, but the GC community is really not that big so this will be fun to watch play out.
You know what, I actually kinda agree with you, the punishment for having sex with a women should be being fined half your income. That aways society would be more productive.
Especially when they have sons like you that claim their only function in life is to provide sex for men as brood mares, or not be given an equivalency of child support to earnings. She must think so highly of you that you say this online.
So if you troll me on a man-post crying this fool is paying less than 10% of his salary for childsupport, it somehow translates to your not paying 10% of your 35,000 a year salary for child support? Haha. Ok.
the funniest part is that it was men who came up with these laws in the first place. these rules were put in place when women didnt work.
Which was when exactly??? Newsflash: women have always worked. Maybe the the rules were put in place when middle- & upper-class women didn't work, but that is an entirely different statement.
Men came up with these laws back in the day a husband could beat his wife with a fucking broom stick. Feminists removed all the traditionalism on their own side but carved out the parts that benefited them.
Here is what grinds my gears. In what universe is 258k the amount to raise a child for a month? If I went to a bank and tried to take out a mortgage of this caliber I would need to undergo a shitton of scrutiny to confirm that I could actually pay it back and the property is actually worth what it is listed for. Somehow a court can come to the conclusion, "yep, this is what child care costs and he will be able to pay it until the child are grown up."
221 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-08-03
This is not the time or place for another black-dick joke
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 myshl0ng 2018-08-03
He looks like a retarded doll
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
Well after knowing about her past actions he still dated her and more...so even though law likes these are outdated to a point in modern USA...he is a retarded doll, because he knew all about her.
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
he did just date her you numpty, he was engaged to her and had 2 kids. He was the one that cancelled the wedding and tossed them all out of his house so he could go bang models.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
I was talking about her first husband, who also pays ungodly amount of alimony to her.
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
She was never married. She had a kid with Matt Leinart at the end of college right as he got drafted to the Cardinals. She got waaaaay less in child support from him than blake, it was 15k a month.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
Is he as famous and well paid as Blake Griffin? Or is 15k a pocket change for him?
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
Well he's made like 60+ mil over his football career so I think he can afford the 3.5 mil total child support he will pay over the 18 years his kid is growing up
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
Lol I guess Blake is now happy that he isn't younger, because when he retires 3 years from now he will be able to ask for a downgrade...still, in current state, 55 million in 18 years...those are some rich kids...and boy, Kardashian's are some expensive ladies.
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
haha yah they are. A seriously expensive romp with a Jenner. Blake's dumb tho, everyone knows Caitlyn gives the best head
1 a_cute_grill 2018-08-03
258k a month? dude is that baby required to drink liquid gold to survive or what?
1 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2018-08-03
They're upgrading it with cybernetics early and training it to dribble young.
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
It's 3 mil a year, dude makes 35 mil a year. The reason these laws exist are to provide consequences for people like Blake Griffin who kicked his fiance and kids out his house on a whim so he could bang Kendell Jenner. This isn't some case of some bullshit alimony decision, dude tossed his family out of his house to bang some young pussy. Fuck him
1 GadolBoobies 2018-08-03
These laws are specifically to provide the child with financial support.
This child (by which I mean the mother) doesn't need 3 million a year.
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
luckily for you, you'll never have to worry about these laws you little mongrel
1 Pablopubes 2018-08-03
Respect the hustle in this thread fam. 👊👊💪💪
1 snappleteadrink 2018-08-03
He got one neutral toned reply u fuckin pleb
1 Pablopubes 2018-08-03
I do not respect your hustle fam. Soft and sluggish 👎👎👎👏👏👏
1 OnicoBoy94 2018-08-03
And he doesn't need 35 million a year. She had a substantial part in giving the freedom to pursue his career choice (wiping not only his ass, but also the asses of his two children while he's tired from playing sperts). The money she's receiving is a pittance compared to what he will earn throughout his lifetime.
1 OnicoBoy94 2018-08-03
and he doesnt need 35 million
1 Peetrius 2018-08-03
COMMIE OUT
1 riemann1413 2018-08-03
how much money do you make
1 Peetrius 2018-08-03
I'm a professional poker player, so I lose money for a living.
1 riemann1413 2018-08-03
i definitely believe you're a loser
1 OnicoBoy94 2018-08-03
you have to go back
1 tensaicanadian 2018-08-03
Your logic is suspect anyway, but Blake Griffin is mixed race.
1 reallyrunningnow 2018-08-03
One drop rule m8.
1 OnicoBoy94 2018-08-03
One drop rule, whitey. We will replace you
1 tensaicanadian 2018-08-03
I’m not sure if you’re trolling or if I am missing some sarcasm. Over the next generation the number of mixed race marriages will increase in North America dramatically and the average skin complexion will become a little darker. That doesn’t bother me at all. My children are mixed race so they will grow up in a less divided world than we have now. Nobody will replace me, I will get old and die. When I die, the country I live in (Canada) will be more multicultural than the country I was born in. I like that. I like Canada’s position on immigration and I think we also need to increase our population to over 100 million to be better positioned to deal with the whims of our southern neighbour on things like trade. The best and probably only way of getting to that number is immigration.
1 Pablopubes 2018-08-03
You are retarded for taking the time to write that out.
1 tensaicanadian 2018-08-03
Yeah I don’t really have a counterpoint for you. You’re probably correct.
1 OnicoBoy94 2018-08-03
i like your flair
1 Pablopubes 2018-08-03
Thanks Ric Flair is the best flair. Much better than /u/zachums pug
1 Zachums 2018-08-03
First of all how dare u
Also, I gave you the fucking idea for the Rick Flair flair.
1 Pablopubes 2018-08-03
🤔🤔🤔😉😉😉😏😏😏
1 riemann1413 2018-08-03
boo
1 OnicoBoy94 2018-08-03
you didn't take the bait in good faith
1 EternallyMiffed 2018-08-03
One day you shits will be hanging from a rope and I'll be laughing all the way to the bonfire
1 OnicoBoy94 2018-08-03
😂😂😂 We will replace you, cumskin 😂😂😂
1 Snowayne2 2018-08-03
OUT OUT OUT DIRTY IMMIGRANT
1 A4QualityPaper 2018-08-03
So much for freedom. He should be allowed to bang some young pussy if he wants without being fined. He should give her enough to support the kids not so she can just sit on her ass all day
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
he still has the freedom to do what he wants, freedom doesn't mean you have 0 responsibility. He had the freedom to not propose and have kids with this woman. He also had the freedom to turn down Kendell Jenner hoe'ing, act like a man, and take care of his family. If you fail at your societal responsibilities there are consequences. This isn't some case of some instagram hoe winning the jackpot, this fuck up is all on Blake
1 A4QualityPaper 2018-08-03
So the punishment should be proportional. 3 million a year is too much. His punishment should be divorce.
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
Are you a teenager? Do you know what proportional means? It is proportional, the kids are getting less than 10% of what he makes every year. Most people who walk out on their family actually end up paying a much higher % of their wage to child support
1 A4QualityPaper 2018-08-03
That's why the system doesn't work. The 3 million is not going to go to the kids. The majority is going to her
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
Damn you have a goldfish brain. I thought you were all for a proportional system 2 posts ago? I wouldn't worry about it too much my little friend, you will never make the kind of money that lands child support payments like this, nor will you ever get your dick touched. I wouldn't stress on it too much
1 A4QualityPaper 2018-08-03
I've gotten my dick touched though...
Are you getting angry because people see how corrupt this system is. All it does is enable women to be lazy greedy and selfish. And of course I won't make 30 million a year is that meant to be an insult?Don't worry you'll never marry a man that makes that much so when your man does cheat on you I'm guessing you'll find another way to fleece him
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
Well since i'm a straight man that's married, yes I agree I will not marry a man that makes that much. I'm only getting bothered cause you fucking idiots see a big ass number, get yourselves all worked up in a tizzy, and never actually educate yourselves on the situation or the laws behind it.
1 MadMaxMercer 2018-08-03
SRD GET OUT OUT OUT
1 A4QualityPaper 2018-08-03
Yeah you sound like a feminist. How much of her income is he getting? Or are women just precious creatures we need to protect?
1 gemininature 2018-08-03
It should be proportional but with a cap of like....idk, a reasonable amount that would sustain a child and nothing else
1 mrlala12321 2018-08-03
They didnt get married though. That's like punishing someone for breaking a contract they planned on signing but never did. You have to be insane or a golddigger to think 238k a month is fair
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
Do you realize that child support and alimony are 2 different things right? You don't suddenly get to abandon your kids because you didn't get married...
1 _Suprememe_ 2018-08-03
Knowing how fast NBA players tend to blow through their money, this decision might end up being the most beneficial for his kids in the long run.
1 riemann1413 2018-08-03
so what is fair when a guy makes $35mil
1 MadMaxMercer 2018-08-03
If a chick can abort her responsibility then why can't I? She wanted the kid, not me, let her pay for it.
1 OnicoBoy94 2018-08-03
The headline made me angry at first, but then I read up on the case and she honestly made a substantial amount of sacrifices in order to facilitate his career choice and then he throws it away first chance he gets to chase an instagram thot. Tbh the ex-wife deserves every single dollar.
1 clarkeff 2018-08-03
Ah yes, government-enforced morality, the feminists' favorite thing.
I think the popular dystopian tv show the Handmaid's Tale is about a world where the government doesn't adequately enforce moral standards, right?
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
I love how you're all up in a tizzy about someone paying child support for their kids here and then will turn around and go rant about "lazy dead beat black fathers" in your little MDE circlejerk
1 lm12btw 2018-08-03
Even if he was a perfect model citizen he'd still be paying the 3M per year though..
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-08-03
If he's smart, he'd put the money in a trust fund now and have it automatically pay his child support over the next 18 years.
1 atsteak 2018-08-03
That's not how any of this works. If she was the one cheating on him she'd still get the kids and the child support.
The loophole is that the more kids you have the smaller the share of child support per kid. If Blake really wants to stick it to his first baby mama, he should go around impregnating every random girl until he has 100 kids and his first baby mama is going getting 2% of the child support.
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
If she was the one cheating on him I bet he could have made a serious case in the courts for custody if he wanted to.
1 atsteak 2018-08-03
Yeah sure the courts are going to give custody to the man with a career and not the mom who already stayed home with the kids for their early years, because of alleged cheating he probably couldn't even prove.
Of course some men think they can game the system by getting custody, avoiding child support and instead hiring 10 full time nannies (still way cheaper than the child support Blake has to pay). Then the courts screw them over and they become embittered r/mensrights posters.
1 alot_the_murdered 2018-08-03
Child support payments are not supposed to be punitive.
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
they are a consequence of walking out on your family tho
1 alot_the_murdered 2018-08-03
That's not what punitive means.
They're supposed to be enough money to support the child, and perhaps the parent in the capacity that they might need to hire babysitters/etc since they might not be a stay at home parent.
They're absolutely not supposed to be punitive. Furthermore, he didn't even marry this woman.
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
I know he didn't marry her, that's why he is not paying alimony. Currently the law is a % of the non-custodial parent's income. The logic is that now that the kid is missing out on life with said parent, they should not be punished for this and miss out on the resources of the parent.
1 neutralvoter 2018-08-03
lol not having $258,000 a months spent on you is punishment? He should be required by law to be there at all times for the child too, because the child's being punished and missing out on the love and attention of a parent. God forbid a child experience change in their lifetime.
1 schoolboystirner 2018-08-03
/u/JumbledFun is a local idiot don't waste time on him.
1 tensaicanadian 2018-08-03
No they are not, they are a consequence of having kids and not being in a relationship with the other parent of the child/children. For someone that’s so preachy about others being educated you really don’t know what you are talking about. She could have walked out on him and he would still be paying child support. Child support is not punitive, it is to support the children financially.
1 reallyrunningnow 2018-08-03
Upvoted to increase dramacoin.
1 tensaicanadian 2018-08-03
That’s not at all what child support laws are for. They are to provide financial support for the child. It’s right there in the name, “child support.”
1 MadMaxMercer 2018-08-03
Do I sense some angst in your comment? Who hurt you?
1 MotorButterscotch 2018-08-03
Something something enforced monogamy
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-08-03
Nah. In plenty of other states there's a cap on the mandatory amount.
In Texas, i believe the cap is currently set so that they only count up to $8550 of your income as elegible for child support calculations.
Precisely because punishing spouses for ending the marriage is NOT the goal of child support in a state that supports No Fault divorce.
1 JumbledFun 2018-08-03
Is that 8500 a year? If so that's hilariously fucked up. Costs a hell of a lot more than that to raise a kid if you want to give them a decent life. Not that I would expect anything less from Texas
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-08-03
8550 a month. Sorry, i should have clarified.
1 Honk4Tits 2018-08-03
Thats fucking ridiculous, I would be curious if there is a way to have that reduced.
1 ZiggyZippy 2018-08-03
If it is anything like Brendan Fraser, then this guy is fucked. To this day, Brendan Fraser (who has not had any film role for years now) is still ordered to pay 50K per month in alimony to his ex. Most people in the U.S. don't even make 50K per year.
1 banhminobanhyou 2018-08-03
Canada is fucked too. Dave Foley owes 17k a month in child support because he was doing NewsRadio at the time, but now he's not. Don't think k he can really go back because they'll arrest him.
1 ArlenBilldozer 2018-08-03
That Dave Foley situation legit pisses me off every time I see it. That guy is truely getting fucked.
1 mmzero 2018-08-03
Ah the Kids in the Hall guy right? I remember seeing some videos with him talking about it in interviews. How the court just would not hear it and wouldn't get it reduced. I always liked that dude so it sucked to hear.
1 Osterion 2018-08-03
Alimony law makes sense for 99% of people. It's only with the super rich that doesn't work as intended.
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-08-03
no not really. this ain't 1900, anybody can get a job. maybe it makes sense in the scenario where one parent has been out of the workforce for 20 years and can't get a job to continue their livestyle, but that's frankly as uncommon these days as being rich is.
1 Osterion 2018-08-03
Like 30%of American mother's are still SAHMs. Yes they can get a job, but their earning potential has been permanently impacted if they've spent any notable amount of time out of the work force. Courts base the duration and income from alimony on these factors.
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-08-03
the general intent of spousal support is to enable the receiver to transition from married to single without getting stuck in the poor house. i'm fine with that to be honest, except in cases where the receiver is capable of working and making a decent life for themselves, and isn't doing so. that happens, a lot, and almost always the wife.
duration of spousal is a weird thing, and does differ state by state. in CA, if you've been married less than 10 years, it's half the length of the marriage. if over 10 years, it's unlimited, unless financial situations change (get a good job, marry a rich person, etc.). unlimited spousal is bad, though at least it's tax deductable for the giver.
also in California, the amount is determined by Dissomaster ( algorithm) unless you fall into some fairly rare categories, like being stinking rich. you can diverge from the calculated amounts, but they're really the way it goes for most people.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-08-03
Yeah, Cali sucks major balls when it comes to divorce.
In Texas, spousal maintenance is only available for 3 years.
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-08-03
sounds about right to me. that should be long enough for anyone to get their shit together. then again you do have to live in Tejas, which is its own punishment.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
He probably has other type of wealth, hence 50k.
1 Feanorfanclub 2018-08-03
At what point is it just good business sense to hire an assassin?
1 jko831 2018-08-03
After ~50 days
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-08-03
Yeah, do NOT get divorced in Cali.
Many other states have slowly reduced or gotten rid of alimony.
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-08-03
this is a child support order, so nothing to do with alimony.
and as i mentioned above, both alimony and child support are sex-neutral in california.
source: am divorced in California AMA bitches
1 GreatnessPersonified 2018-08-03
Did the court use your current wage as assitant fries manager, or do they look at your potential earnings as assistant night manager when they decided how much your boyfriend pays?
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-08-03
they used my salary at separation date, yes. "potential earnings" -- what you're referring to here is imputing earnings, which the court can do in situations where, say, someone takes a $20k job to try to avoid spousal/child support (where they were previously making $150k a year or something). When under a spousal/child support order, having your income drop is a bad thing, as the instant suspicion is that you're trying to lower your income in order to lower the total $$ of your order.
tbh i wished i had made minimum wage, fuckin support order would have been like a hundred bucks a month. the actual one was much, much larger -- but all gone now!
1 GreatnessPersonified 2018-08-03
How did you get rid of the kid?
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-08-03
nobody lives forever bby
nah they aged out. unlike shitholes like Oregon, California only stipulate support until 18 (or 19 if they're still in high school or something). Oregon requires till they reach 21, which is insane and ridiculous, but that's Oregon for you.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-08-03
I know this is a child support order. The guy i was replying to mentioned an anecdote about alimony in Cali.
And yeah it's theoretically "sex neutral" but we all know who is more likely to get fucked.
Source: 3 years of law school and a couple internships focusing mostly on family law.
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-08-03
lol 3 years of law school it took to teach you that basic truth? sheesh you millennials have surely slipped
see my other post about "female attorney / female judge" -- best advice I can give. besides catching your ex in financial malfeasance, that's useful too (trust me, i know)
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-08-03
The psychology of gender as it relates to bias and favorability from judges in family law cases in highly complex. A female judge may be more likely to award lower maintenance in general, but may also be less sympathetic to an individual defendant. And vice versa. It is much more beneficial to track the individual judge's record.
Same with the lawyer, except much more so since competence, skill and experience far outweighs minor issues of whether the judge likes your lawyer.
At least that's what my profs told me. I wasn't exactly editor of the law review so take anything i say with a massive grain of salt.
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-08-03
yeah i mean that's all basic human psychology stuff really. and yeah it's totally complex -- you can have a shit day in court just because the judge missed her coffee that morning, or because he got into a fight with his wife last night. or was up snorting lines until 20 mins before court.
the worst is a family court judge, new to the bench, who is out to be a crusader and protect the poor, poor womenfolk. that's when you're fucked.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-08-03
Not really.
Appeals are a thing. If the judge is absolutely a shit heel, a competent lawyer will preserve the record for appeal and then get another, higher, judge to curtail the stupidity.
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-08-03
dammit i wrote this nice, informational response, and then hit some fucking button and poof! there it went into the ether
summary though (since i'm entirely too lazy to type out anything approximating what I did before):
appeals are all fine and dandy except:
And of course having a good attorney comes into it, that's so simple it should never even be mentioned. My first family law attorney, when i started talking to them, was like $150 an hour. I quickly switched to a $450/hr guy and it was night and fucking day.
1 LongPostBot 2018-08-03
Mommy is soooo proud of you, sweaty. Let's put this sperg out up on the fridge with all your other failures.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-08-03
Agreed to all of that. My point is simply that as a litigant in family court instead of picking whichever female lawyer looks nice, and praying for a female judge, you are probably better off finding the most competent and experienced lawyer you can afford; who will presumably know which judge isn't a scumbag.
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-08-03
we should just do it like our ancestors did -- trial by combat. god would never let the unworthy survive.
1 Scubadivingismylife 2018-08-03
Check his IMDb.
1 ZiggyZippy 2018-08-03
258k per month until the kid hits 18 years old. Damn, I've not seen a guy get fucked this hard by family court since Brendan Frasier.
This is why some rich guys get vasectomies and prenuptial agreements before they stick their dick in those hoes. I bet this guy is wishing he had worn a rubber instead of going in raw. That pussy ain't worth 258k per month.
1 schoolboystirner 2018-08-03
I think she's got another baby from an NFL player she gets child support from. If so that's just impressive hustle. Probably makes more than the other guy at this point.
1 SchrodingerIsAlive 2018-08-03
Yeah but what about the mom? She needs to be able to have money too?! Otherwise she'll have to work.
1 CulturalYogurt 2018-08-03
Child support goes directly to the parent with more custody. The court doesn't hand a check to a six year old, and it also doesn't enforce rules on how that money is spent.
1 TSwizzlesNipples 2018-08-03
LOL there aren't any rules to enforce.
1 YameteOniichanItai 2018-08-03
99% of athletes are retards, falling for shit like this, lol.
1 Matthew1J 2018-08-03
I wouldn't really mind this if women were required to prove it was spent on the children or if the father was able to spend the money on housing, food, clothes, education and toys/entertainment for the children himself. But you can guarantee the $258K a month is not going all to the kids. They will end up with a small portion of that.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
They are in other countries...just saying.
1 BoringNormalGuy 2018-08-03
Just remove the "women" part. Why can't we require any government mandated funds to be allocated and audited. If the government gives out welfare, people who receive it should easily be able to show how they spent it, and Mother's and Ex Wives receiving alimony should be held to that standard as well.
If you get X amount to spend on the Child, you should be forbidden from spending it on yourself.
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-08-03
depends on the state I would assume, but at least in California there is no man/woman stipulation about who gets paid. it's based on a calculator (well for us normal people at least) which isn't sex-based, but rather income based.
that being said, of course there's still discrimination against men in the courts. protip: get a female lawyer, get a female judge if you're . a man. they're much less likely to get all "awwwww a girl here have some money sweetie" than men are.
1 Matthew1J 2018-08-03
I was talking about this specific case IDK why I said women instead of the woman, but now it's properly gender neutralized. Though in general it's still going to be the women who get the children.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-08-03
Better yet just live in a state where child support gets capped so you don't have to worry about this ridiculous bullshit.
1 JohnGalt316 2018-08-03
she just got her 18 year 55.7 million dollar contract
better than anything she could get from the WNBA
1 StudntRdyTeachrApear 2018-08-03
Burn it all down
1 ArlenBilldozer 2018-08-03
White bitches: Not. Even. Once.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
He makes 3 million a month. It should be 1.5million.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
Lol, nice bait.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Oh a creepy stalker mra is crying that men have to pay child support. Virgincel fools lol. So you can’t do math dummy? Is it your tiny balls that make you incapable of understanding? Haha loser.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
Mra, lol they are just as pathetic as you lasses.
Also - I can do math, can you do law ya legbeard?. Go pet one of your million cats or post on lchat.
I'm gonna have a guess that you have zero success even among other butches
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
What? Speak English idiot. Are you seriously trying to say use cats like some 90’s era stereotype of women? No you aren’t an mra at all lol. How old are you 60? Stfu gray pube fool.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
From the looks of it my english is better than your, how old are you 35 and alone?
Lol, I take some shit back...butches dating you? Lol that's a far away dream of yours.
Not even a pre everything transwoman would consider you attractive in any way possible you troll.
Get your land manatee license out of your ass and post it on grindr.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Grindr is for men you dumb soybrained loser. You are more POC than me? Lol. Is it a contest? Hilarious. Lesbians fuck a lot don’t you know, why you are so scared of us? Cause you are too fat to catch any woman so you can rape her, I’m sure you’ll just keep jacking ur tiny button to gay for pay porn accounts. Maybe try grindr, I hear male on male sex is fun. Try it beta bottom.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
Grindr is gender inclusive you twat..and even if it's for men..you look like one so it's your only choice to get laid...but you won't - gay men have standarts.
Keep lying to yourself - you are out of shape and you haven't seen even your own pussy since 9/11.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Grindr is for gay men, you knew that tho. Go get yourself some bussy. Someone will suck that needledick if you beg maybe.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
https://www.theverge.com/2017/11/28/16712376/grindr-update-app-gender-identity-lgbtq
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Google scholar lol.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
It's pinknews you idiot.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
You read penis news? Figures.
1 SimplyPoopy 2018-08-03
Would you shut up please.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Man feelz triggered
1 SimplyPoopy 2018-08-03
No you’re just really annoying and you have a really low IQ.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Men with low IQ’s are mad lol.
1 SimplyPoopy 2018-08-03
🤦♂️
1 subpoutine 2018-08-03
So you don’t own any cats? Not hearing a denial, sweaty.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
The compulsive masturbator is mad when his old ass tired insults are mocked. Stay mad virgin.
1 subpoutine 2018-08-03
The compulsive lesbian bed death sufferer is mad when her tired old brain mixes up users. Stay mad sugartits.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
LBD lol. Are you too ugly to get women? Stay salty needledick.
1 subpoutine 2018-08-03
So just how many cats do you have?
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
How many white pubes do you have?
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
I'd bet that you know a lot about masturbation than all of us.
Stay woke, not even your cats lick you darlin'.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
I don’t need cats, I get real women. I do know a lot about masturbation, just don’t have to practice it. Don’t be so jelly, it makes you uglier.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
You don't even get fake women. You literally too ugly for LCHAT and there are some ugly bitches there.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
What’s fake women? Like your mom? How do you know so much about LGBT+ you are creepy af also.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
I know more than you - Mr. reddit troll.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
You know more than me about what lol. Being a creepy troll is not something to brag about loser.
1 aqouta 2018-08-03
Lol imagine sticking it to men by being a political lesbian and getting butt mad when men just jack off instead.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Haha you can’t discern the difference between anger and mocking? Lol you sound smart lmao
1 aqouta 2018-08-03
1 subpoutine 2018-08-03
lol his girlfriend is actually pretty hot
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
His hairy white hand he named darlin’ doesn’t count.
1 broden 2018-08-03
He named her Georgina.
I mean, I named her Georgina.
1 subpoutine 2018-08-03
No, I’m serious. He’s posted pics of her in r/Drama before. Very cute, slim blonde girl. Good fencer too.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
That’s creepy af.
1 subpoutine 2018-08-03
oh lord, son in addition to being a dateless dyke with 10 cats, you’re also fat? 🤣
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Awe. I really triggered grandpa.
1 subpoutine 2018-08-03
And is that😡 supposed😡😡😡 to be an insult😳???😂😂?😤?😒 Just FYI, I'm 6'2🙂🤔🤔, 195 lbs, 10% body fat.😐😐😐 Broad shoulders💪💪, very defined😳, powerful 😤😤back 💦😏😏😏(deadlift PR of 505 lbs), chest hair🐒🐒, full thick💦💦🍆 beard,😱😱 veiny 🍆forearms💪💪🍆🍆, protruding 😁😁and defined jawline😵😱😳😳, and the majority of my 😝wardrobe is made up of dress shirts. 🎩 😎 👞👞.
I'm an Instagram girl's 👧👧😏😏wet dream💦💦, and I still turn that shit down since I have better options throwing themselves at me😏😏😏 nearly every time I💪💪💪😂😂🍆💦💦 go out in public.😎😎
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
You haven’t fucked since 1992 gramps.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
Ok, now I know 100% that you are a troll. Should I announce this to GenderCritical mod team? They hate people like you.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
You going to announce to GC that men should pay a reasonable percentage of child support to earnings ratio and peepee pants men get mad when you point that out? Haha yeah try that, link me tho, it will be hilarious.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
No, I'm gonna annouce to GC mods in their discord that you are a male troll.
Wanna try me
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Please do, it will be hilarious.
1 Zozbot 2018-08-03
zoz
1 Zozbot 2018-08-03
zle
1 Zozbot 2018-08-03
zozzle
1 subpoutine 2018-08-03
I wasn’t born by 1992, cat lady. I’m sensing some projection here. Getting a little up there, are we? 😉
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Grandpa is really selling this larp.
1 subpoutine 2018-08-03
I love older ladies 😍
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
We been know old man.
1 subpoutine 2018-08-03
Say what now?
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
Lol, you're not even a dyke, you are a dude from donaldo pretending to be one.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
I made this dicksucker is really mad. Damn.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
Lol, at least they get laid..unlike you.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
This dood is sad right now. Male tears abound.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
That’s what you say to all the women you can’t rape?
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
You're still here dude?
Ahhh you linked me to GC....I feel honored.
Ladies....if ya see this Lezzymclezface is a male troll in your safe space.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Right lol. The baby men of r/drama is a safe space for women. You got it missy!
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
Actually you linked the whole damn thread dude.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Yes ma’am I linked the whole thread. It’s really funny how triggered all the soyboys are. And I looked back at it, it was you. I’d love it if they tried to retaliate b/c I hurt the man feelz of troll men mad that paying less than 10% of your yearly salary makes men cry. Not sure what you mean by they hate me, but the GC community is really not that big so this will be fun to watch play out.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-08-03
Whatever dude.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Whatever is right ma’am
1 MozzerDozzer 2018-08-03
I don't think that the woman is a pro level athlete to be earning that much.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
I wish we could still ping retards so that we could have retarded arguments with people who actually believe this, and not poor trolls.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
None of the virgincels on this thread can do math, now they mad. This is really funny.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
You gotta get some better bait for me Mister
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Being math-capable is bait to dumb salty men. Ok miss.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
You gotta try a different angle fam, it's gonna be a no from me dawg on taking this bait.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
It’s not an “angle” it’s math lol.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
You know what, I actually kinda agree with you, the punishment for having sex with a women should be being fined half your income. That aways society would be more productive.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
So marriage and family creation is reduced to “having sex with a woman” don’t let this treasure go ladies. He seems like a real keeper lol.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
Yes, what other thing was she bringing to the table?
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Wow. Your Mom must be so proud at what she gave birth to and raised. What a gentleman.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
Ikr, mothers are incredibly biased to think good of their kids.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Especially when they have sons like you that claim their only function in life is to provide sex for men as brood mares, or not be given an equivalency of child support to earnings. She must think so highly of you that you say this online.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
idk, I feel like your assessment of my opinion is limited to the fact that so far I've only really been able to disparage women, and not men too.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Stick to the topic, you are just trolling at this point.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
Idk, I don't really see the value in relationship outside of exploitation of another human being.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
As long as the person exploited is female. Yeah got that. You made that very clear already.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
idk, I feel like both men and women enter relationships explicitly for exploitation of each other
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Maybe. Idc.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
Life sucks
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
For str8s? lol
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
You're back, how are you?
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Did you go to court for your child support case?
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
No, I'll settle outside of court with my imaginary ex-wife on the child-support payments.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
While simultaneously defending greedy men? Sounds very male troll.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
stones who live in people shouldn't throw glass houses.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Oh you are a teen, I thought so, but that’s sad you are this bitter already.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
Tell me your life story. Go!
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
How will your teen brain conceptualize it?
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-08-03
Poorly, I'm not a teen, but obviously my intellect stopped growing after at most 13.
1 Mother_Jabubu 2018-08-03
And just like that, you got out trolled. Bigly
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
I got trolled? Haha I triggered all the men too fat and ugly to go to proud boy meetings if that’s possible. Who got trolled? Wot? Lol
1 Mother_Jabubu 2018-08-03
way to admit you fantasize about being broodmare for alt right Chads
1 soyboyoyoyoyong 2018-08-03
is this meant to be a coherent statement or did you have a stroke?
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Damn, these comments from the virgincel’s are just sad.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Just suck dick already, that stigma is long gone.
1 soyboyoyoyoyong 2018-08-03
lol back to back replies, are your hands shaking?
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
“Man rules” lol.
1 soyboyoyoyoyong 2018-08-03
wtf are you even babbling about, this isn't bantz it's just boring.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
So if you troll me on a man-post crying this fool is paying less than 10% of his salary for childsupport, it somehow translates to your not paying 10% of your 35,000 a year salary for child support? Haha. Ok.
1 SizeOfThisLad 2018-08-03
>I'm a big strong independent wymyn who don't need no gender roles
>Give me half your stuff lmfao
Pick one
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Both dumbass. Not your broodmare.
1 SizeOfThisLad 2018-08-03
>gender roles are only okay when the woman makes out ahead LMFAO
If you've ever wondered why so many people don't take you seriously, this would be why.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Yeah tell that to a 9 year old “bride” you scumbag.
1 SizeOfThisLad 2018-08-03
I'm not really sure what your point is here. I'm not a Muslim so I'm very much against child marriage fyi.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
I know math is difficult right?
1 SizeOfThisLad 2018-08-03
What
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
You don’t even understand the word. Math. Don’t cry.
1 SizeOfThisLad 2018-08-03
I'm just sitting here wondering how you got from alimony-->child marriage-->MATH. If you're trying to make a point you're being very obtuse about it.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
I’ll just keep triggering you with the word - math lol.
1 SizeOfThisLad 2018-08-03
Since I'm so dumb would you mind explaining whatever the hell your point is in a short, declarative sentence or two?
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Math! Lol.
1 SizeOfThisLad 2018-08-03
Thanks for confirming my suspicion you're an idiot.
1 d311h0p 2018-08-03
Where does childcare cost 1.5 million a month?
1 MozzerDozzer 2018-08-03
In the land of Sarkiseeniya.
1 IllustriousQuail 2018-08-03
To hit that amount, you'd basically have to hire Robert Downey Jr. as your nanny.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
1.5 million is half of his monthly salary, I said that already dumbass haha.
1 reallyrunningnow 2018-08-03
Guys, DO NOT DOWNVOTE HER. Because of the pingocide, we need people like her.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Guys, guys, we are lonely and pathetic, and talk to each other like we are on a video game hahaha.
1 reallyrunningnow 2018-08-03
Welcome honored guest.. Could I introduce you to Pizzashill?
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Awe. I love the Virgin-speak of underperforming men. Fun. Does your mom get child support for you?
1 reallyrunningnow 2018-08-03
Jeez did you just assume my gender?
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
What did you say ma’am? I mean sir? Xir? Xe? Xem?
1 reallyrunningnow 2018-08-03
Does that mean a bunch of scientologists will worship me? Also Pizzashill is our resident incel.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Omg you are now trying to mansplain it lol. Xenu you are a walking stereotype haha.
1 reallyrunningnow 2018-08-03
Rude.
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Xenu don’t cry. Your Dorito dust keyboard is showing.
1 reallyrunningnow 2018-08-03
Tsk. You really hate women, don't you? Are you sure you're not a "nice guy" pretending?
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
You seem real smart lol
1 reallyrunningnow 2018-08-03
Is that really your attempt at insulting me?
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
It’s an observable fact, you are a complete idiot.
1 reallyrunningnow 2018-08-03
... And you have the insult vocab of a 12 year old
1 double-happiness 2018-08-03
Which was when exactly??? Newsflash: women have always worked. Maybe the the rules were put in place when middle- & upper-class women didn't work, but that is an entirely different statement.
1 moudougou 2018-08-03
don't tell mde
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-08-03
they totally were. you think some housekeeper married to a sharecropped in Alabama in 1910 even could get a divorce? not bloody likely
1 Red_of_Head 2018-08-03
That’s what you get for cheating on your baby momma
1 poliwrath3 2018-08-03
how on earth do you still go raw with someone who is already collecting child support from another professional athlete?
1 cruelandusual 2018-08-03
Funny how quickly feminists start talking like anti-abortion zealots.
1 GadolBoobies 2018-08-03
This is the shit they're upvoting too.
Caroline Norton created the Tender Years Doctrine.
And it's modern feminists like NOW that are directly opposing reforming it.
Literally entirely feminisms fault. But they still blame men.
1 MXMXMO 2018-08-03
Men came up with these laws back in the day a husband could beat his wife with a fucking broom stick. Feminists removed all the traditionalism on their own side but carved out the parts that benefited them.
Strap your shit lads.
1 HailSanta2512 2018-08-03
Accountability and personal responsibility are the antithesis to feminism
1 Gtyyler 2018-08-03
Here is what grinds my gears. In what universe is 258k the amount to raise a child for a month? If I went to a bank and tried to take out a mortgage of this caliber I would need to undergo a shitton of scrutiny to confirm that I could actually pay it back and the property is actually worth what it is listed for. Somehow a court can come to the conclusion, "yep, this is what child care costs and he will be able to pay it until the child are grown up."
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
Are you talking to each other like a world of Warcraft session. Haha losers! Men are greedy and will defend other men in a group think? Shocker
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-03
In your mamas pussy