The galaxy brains of Wikipedia Edition are having a brawl about Sarah Jeong, when (((oddly enough))) nothing in her Wikipedia page mentions the controversies as reported and spread not only on social medias, but also on actual worthwhile website like the BBC and co.
Mentions of gamergate are a given, also conspiracy theories to make her seem racist, etc...
Sarah Jeong is an American journalist specializing in law and technology topics. Jeong is a senior writer for The Verge and in September 2018 joins the editorial board of The New York Times. She was previously a contributing editor for Vice's Motherboard section.
Sarah Jeong is an American journalist specializing in law and technology topics. Jeong is a senior writer for The Verge and in September 2018 joins the editorial board of The New York Times. She was previously a contributing editor for Vice's Motherboard section.
Racism is the idea that people of a race are bad because their race makes them so. She criticizing people doing bad things while white, not people doing bad things because they white. Key difference.
lol o ok thanks for clarifying, guess i can say shit like "it's kind of sick how much joy i get out of being cruel to old black men" and it's not gonna be called racist.
My point is that context matters. Her being a person of color criticizing white people for their biased actions against poc is not the same thing as white peoples long history of putting down people of color.
it's bait. i'm not getting into a spergy internet 'debate' about race politics with some tard who argues against people saying "how about no one be racist to anyone, regardless of their own race/past" by justifying it with BUHBUHBUHT MUH OPPRESSION.
Hot take: Sarah Jeong is thoroughly addicted to the Mediocre White Cock and is working as an agent provocateur for the Mayocracy.
She's just given the DDF and the rest of the Fake News Crew the best piece of ammunition they could hope for. Literally any story coming from the NYT can now be dismissed as racist. Any suggestion that journalism is important is severely undermined. And, most importantly for us, every article from the NYT can now be turned into a racial slap fight.
Weev must have really laid the pipe. Usually the chicks I fuck swear off me, and sometimes my race, afterwards. This motherfucker is changing elections with his pale pecker.
So whoever controls the Weev peen controls the elections which means whoever controls the Weev peen controls the country and by extension the free world.
44 comments
1 ultimatewikibot 2018-08-05
Talk:Sarah Jeong
About | Leave me alone
1 BussyShillBot 2018-08-05
That entire subreddit is a cesspool. It's like a sewer that empties directly into a stagnant pond.
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 SnapshillBot 2018-08-05
Your condescending, contradictory bullshit isn't attractive to anyone except your frothing, basement-dwelling, virgin army.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 ChateauJack 2018-08-05
The galaxy brains of Wikipedia Edition are having a brawl about Sarah Jeong, when (((oddly enough))) nothing in her Wikipedia page mentions the controversies as reported and spread not only on social medias, but also on actual worthwhile website like the BBC and co.
Mentions of gamergate are a given, also conspiracy theories to make her seem racist, etc...
1 ultimatewikibot 2018-08-05
Sarah Jeong
Image
About | Leave me alone
1 Rainman99999 2018-08-05
So she is a failed lawyer. I want to beat her parents. What a disagree. Being a Korean myself this is so embarrassing.
1 a_cute_grill 2018-08-05
i know right? maybe next life...
1 Redactor0 2018-08-05
Aigoo aigoo aigoo... ๐
1 CSharpApostle 2018-08-05
Whats your top 5 kpop bands or youre not korean
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2018-08-05
BTS > other K-Pop bands
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2018-08-05
That explains why she's so pants on head retarded
1 ultimatewikibot 2018-08-05
Sarah Jeong
Image
About | Leave me alone
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-08-05
The problem with Wikipedia is that all the editors are the type of people who would spend hours editing Wikipedia.
1 MemoirsofCrime 2018-08-05
Reading Wikipedia discussions is one of the most souldestroying things a person can do.
1 TherapyFortheRapy 2018-08-05
Amazing how against drama this sub is when the drama is about a feminist behaving badly.
This sub is SRS3 at this point.
1 Going_up_the_Country 2018-08-05
Oh no, it's retarded.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2018-08-05
Fetch the double barrel, son, we gotta put him down
1 2RetardedEven4Drama 2018-08-05
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-08-05
...You do realzie hwo many threads there were about her, right?
1 jerkedpickle 2018-08-05
Oh no, itโs gay
1 911roofer 2018-08-05
I wish. Then we wouldn't be in danger of it reproducing.
1 SilverMars 2018-08-05
This subreddit is operating under like 7 levels of irony. Keep up famicom
1 InternalCartographer 2018-08-05
How retarded are you?
1 CSharpApostle 2018-08-05
Hello newb
1 ztoundas 2018-08-05
Imagine thinking she's actually racist.
1 ztoundas 2018-08-05
Imagine thinking she's actually racist.
1 d-amazo 2018-08-05
she is tho
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-08-05
You can't be racists against nonhumans.
1 d-amazo 2018-08-05
touche
1 ztoundas 2018-08-05
Racism is the idea that people of a race are bad because their race makes them so. She criticizing people doing bad things while white, not people doing bad things because they white. Key difference.
1 d-amazo 2018-08-05
lol o ok thanks for clarifying, guess i can say shit like "it's kind of sick how much joy i get out of being cruel to old black men" and it's not gonna be called racist.
1 ztoundas 2018-08-05
Depends on the context. Are you black?
1 d-amazo 2018-08-05
nope but sarah jeong isn't white, either, so what's your point?
if it's racist for me to say x thing about y race it is also racist for her to say x thing about z race.
1 ztoundas 2018-08-05
My point is that context matters. Her being a person of color criticizing white people for their biased actions against poc is not the same thing as white peoples long history of putting down people of color.
1 d-amazo 2018-08-05
lol dammit i took the bait again
1 ztoundas 2018-08-05
You know that wasn't bait.
1 d-amazo 2018-08-05
it's bait. i'm not getting into a spergy internet 'debate' about race politics with some tard who argues against people saying "how about no one be racist to anyone, regardless of their own race/past" by justifying it with BUHBUHBUHT MUH OPPRESSION.
1 ztoundas 2018-08-05
You ending your comment there with a strawman argument does not bode well for how great you even understand the issue in the first place.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-08-05
Dude, edgy jokes aren't racism.
1 d-amazo 2018-08-05
you're correct.
but a lot of her tweets weren't jokes, and there's so many of them that it's suspect. is that fair.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-08-05
Yeah, it's fair.
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-08-05
Hot take: Sarah Jeong is thoroughly addicted to the Mediocre White Cock and is working as an agent provocateur for the Mayocracy.
She's just given the DDF and the rest of the Fake News Crew the best piece of ammunition they could hope for. Literally any story coming from the NYT can now be dismissed as racist. Any suggestion that journalism is important is severely undermined. And, most importantly for us, every article from the NYT can now be turned into a racial slap fight.
Weev must have really laid the pipe. Usually the chicks I fuck swear off me, and sometimes my race, afterwards. This motherfucker is changing elections with his pale pecker.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2018-08-05
So whoever controls the Weev peen controls the elections which means whoever controls the Weev peen controls the country and by extension the free world.
Lads, we've got to our hands on that peen
1 weev 2018-08-05
Willing to consider any young women who are looking for a husband
1 Lezzymclezface 2018-08-05
So many while male tears screeching mayocide.
1 throwawayact69 2018-08-05
Is it that shocking that wikipedia has trouble with highly politicized garbage and that many articles are just trash?