And what's Spicer going to say, "Oh yeah, it's all legit!" First of all, he's not even one of the 10, and you can tell Trump wouldn't let him in on it. And second of all, if he did say that, it would just make tons of people bombard him with more questions about it, which he really knows nothing about. This is top level Military Intel at the highest level of Classified Clearance.
She’s got more likes the Retweets. There are some funny as shit responses but she didn’t get ratioed. My personally favorite.
DAMN RIGHT MILLIE YOU NO HOW TO OWN THOSE LIBRALS THEY ARE SO DUM FACEBOOK IS PUBLIC BECAUSE I OPEN MY PHONE AND ITS THERE IN PUBLIC AND NOW IMMA TAKE SOME SELFIES WITH GUNS IN MY PANTS AND TAKE A COUPLE OF TOOTS OF COCAINE OFF THE STREET WITH A STRAW TO OWN THOSE PESKY LIBS!
if Alex wants to start gayfrogstube.com to host his own videos, he can.
No.
We should collectively decide that he's gone too far, and he needs to be "deplatformed" as you kids like to say.
90% of what he says is complete horseshit, he's endangering his own health, mentally and physically, the health of those people who believe the worst of what he says, and inciting people to have thoughts and beliefs that are grossly out of line with reality, and contributing to those people's lives and their loved ones to be much more miserable than it needs to be or should be.
But Republicans got rid of net neutrality, so they should be in favor of ISPs doing whatever they want, even if it means banning Alex Jones websites. He would have to lay his own wire lol, or just go back to crank mailers.
We forced businesses to open their doors to the blacks, now we must take that next step in the civil rights struggle and force them to open then to the klansman. Only then will we be truly free.
What she said on Twitter was stupid, but you're right about the hypocrisy from the left. It's also funny to compare this to the gay cake thing, and to their position on corporations in general (corporations not being people and therefore not having the exact same rights, vs. the argument that a corporation has 1st amendment rights).
There's also their stance on monopolies being bad.
They also usually love antitrust protections. The Shermon antitrust act is quite succinct. A "conspiracy" it says, ironically, which limits trade is illegal. Several companies conspiring together to prevent a crazy guy from selling crazy might be ruled illegal.
And if course, there's that supreme court case from a century ago where an entire town was owned by an oil company. The company put up "No solicitation" signs and tried to keep Mormons from going door-to-door. The company's arguments will sound very familiar: "we're not violating your freedom of religion because we're not the government- you're free to be Mormon anywhere you like, just not on our property." The court sided with the Mormons and prevented the company from kicking them out.
There's a chance a court would side with Jones based on the precedent above, or based on antitrust, or any number of other reasons. And if the tech companies were owned by right wingers and if they were censoring the left, these arguments would be all over the media.
I'm not able to actually argue for the things I believe, so instead, I will allude to an argument, but keep it vague enough to be meaningless.
Sorry to hear that buddy. If that situation ever changes, please let me know.
I know. I know that you're not retarded, but I'm correct in my assessment of you as someone who cannot defend the things he believes. You desperately want to say, "here's why you're wrong ____" and fill in the blank with something meaningful. But you can't, and that bothers you. So instead, you're doing this fake quote thing.
It's normal to believe things very strongly. It's human nature. But what you ought to be able to do, on reaching adulthood, is go further than simple belief - you ought to be able to give a reason for the things you believe.
It's also very common to be defensive when someone highlights your failure to go further than simple belief. It's common, but that's no excuse. You ought to strive for more.
It's only when you choose to remain in that childish state, where you feel that you're right but don't test your beliefs exposing them and defending them - that's the only real failure.
The mistake you're making here is assuming that my critique of the far left is a result of my personal politics.
I'm a liberal on many issues. I'm pro-choice, I'm in favor of universal basic income (have you heard of this guy? He makes a very compelling case), universal healthcare, strong environmental regulations, and yes, breaking up monopolies. Had the government not broken up AT&T for example, I firmly believe we would still all be using rotary phones that don't unplug from the wall.
On other issues, I'm conservative. For example, I'm big on the right to bear arms and freedom of speech (which is hilarious that this now makes me literally hitler). But the point is, you shouldn't read the post above as me saying, "here's a list of things that I disagree with."
Rather, you should read it as me pointing out what I see as hypocrisy. I really do believe that if these companies leaned right, and if they were banning leftists, there would be wall-to-wall media coverage making the case that they're monopolies that need to be broken up. Remember MicroSoft's antitrust case? At the time, MS was seen as being a standard evil corporation (which translates to, right-wing). So they got no love from the media. It's a really strange contrast to what's going on now. These companies are seen as staunchly left-leaning, so they're getting support.
...so long as they toe the line. I see this morning that Twitter has said it's not going to ban Infowars, and the left is hating on them.
I really do believe that if these companies leaned right, and if they were banning leftists, there would be wall-to-wall media coverage making the case that they're monopolies.
Yeah, I more or less agree, The right would probably be praising it and saying they can do whatever they want since its a private business too. Political discussion these days is just yelling everything you can think of to see what sticks.
The idea of breaking them up is pretty interesting, I wonder how it could actually work. the main benefit of these social media sites is that everyone else is on them. Even if they were to split the accounts between the two new businesses everyone would just migrate towards one of them. In that sense maybe they should be a government regulated monopoly?
I'm don't agree that most of these tech giants can be hit with antitrust or be "broken up" in a way that makes sense, but I do agree with you that Google/Alphabet in particular is at the very least border-monopolistic. YouTube will never face any legitimate competition in the video sharing space as long as they enjoy a privileged relationship with their parent that dominates online advertising, has advanced cloud hosting infrastructure at its disposal, and seems willing to eat any of YouTube's losses. YouTube being spun off would solve a lot of problems and probably give its competitors a fighting chance.
They love government power when it's directed at those they don't like. Even with policies like free trade, they shut up in the face of trade wars and tarriffs.
Liberalism isn't the problem. I get conservatives are increasingly upset over the fact they have no credible academics or intellectuals, valid policy goals, and they've lost every culture war for the last 40 years, but "both sides" are not the same.
That's just something conservatives repeat themselves to avoid admitting they're dumb people.
Well its a good thing I ain't a conservative then. And last time I check they are winning the current culture war, not like the democrats are doing much of anything to block republicans now are they? As far as academia goes you do realize academia is overall is against conservatism right? But hey the left is all about tolerance and more so diversity right?
I don't understand. Did a child write this? Of course academia is against conservatism. Academia is reserved for people who know things and can orate them without dribbling dip spit into their overalls. If the left championing diversity means having to pretend your ideas aren't jaw dropping retarded then I guess call me Adolf and throw up a salute there chief.
If you think conservatives are winning any culture war you're more deluded than I had thought tbh.
As far as academia goes you do realize academia is overall is against conservatism right? But hey the left is all about tolerance and more so diversity right?
Academia is against conservativism because it's a shit tier worldview that can't be supported with anything approaching facts.
This is like the ugliest conservathot I've seen. Come on there has to be more to it than being blonde and throwing in a red cap. Have some standards guys. Lauren Southern is A++, I would literally pretend to be a Trump supporter so that I could get rejected by her. This? Nah.
The only argument i see that its public space is that there will never be a rival to facebook that isnt its own thing entirely, unless it was state supported. It would be like reinventing the wooden plane and showing everyoje you can fly
Not necessarily. Everything crumbles and falls eventually. The question is just if it's within a timespan relevant to our life, and I think this one will be.
It unquestionably is, and you've identified the reason why. The internet is analogous to a physical location. Banning people from your site is equivalent to blocking them from all the conversations happening anywhere, especially if your site is as big as Twitter and YouTube. The constitution wasn't designed with the internet in mind and we need extra protections so that rich assholes with friends in the media can't memory-hole whoever they want.
She's right, of course. You look at websites that ban Democrats and they get sued. Eharmony didn't allow fags and got sued. Starbucks can't ask a black person to leave when they are loitering without getting sued. But the government can call these companies in front of Congress and sanction them if they don't do what they say. It's state sponsored censorship. Hopefully, Trump gets to put this new Supreme Court together and restores our Constitution.
Mate, you're not allowed to ban people on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender or sexuality, but you definitely are allowed to ban them for their political stance.
236 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-08-07
And what's Spicer going to say, "Oh yeah, it's all legit!" First of all, he's not even one of the 10, and you can tell Trump wouldn't let him in on it. And second of all, if he did say that, it would just make tons of people bombard him with more questions about it, which he really knows nothing about. This is top level Military Intel at the highest level of Classified Clearance.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2018-08-07
For her unbelievable retardation and inability to understand private vs public sector, I hope the mayocide takes her first.
1 _Suprememe_ 2018-08-07
I wish these morons would stop shitting out takes so mind-numbingly stupid that they make me defend corporate tech titans.
1 Ikea_Man 2018-08-07
yeah you know you have a terrible opinion when people agree with Facebook over you
1 ry8919 2018-08-07
Verily. May the great tide that is mayocide crash upon her with the fury of a thousand fists!
1 ItWouldBeGrand 2018-08-07
Publisher versus platform.
1 honeychild7878 2018-08-07
She’s a writer for Infowars. I hope she’s unemployable after this
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-08-07
Even Alex Jones knows the difference between publicly traded and public sector, at least I hope so.
1 Ikea_Man 2018-08-07
nah she'll find work
1 banananutbranmuffin 2018-08-07
Don't worry, she will always have simps donating money to her patreon or whatever else attractive women use to pay the bills.
1 FirearmThrowaway 2018-08-07
She’s got more likes the Retweets. There are some funny as shit responses but she didn’t get ratioed. My personally favorite.
1 Strictlybutters 2018-08-07
It’s the ratio of comments to likes/retweet’s famalam
1 FirearmThrowaway 2018-08-07
You young kids, I don’t know your god damned lingo any more. Get off my lawn and leave me in peace with my mayonnaise sandwich.
1 kippot 2018-08-07
sips
now Quake, THATS a shooter
1 gumble212 2018-08-07
this but unironically
1 Exactly_the_same_bot 2018-08-07
That's exactly what (s)he said
1 gumble212 2018-08-07
Shit bot
1 kippot 2018-08-07
i was memeing but not ironically
1 almondicecream 2018-08-07
Stfu bog
1 kippot 2018-08-07
dømp it
1 DaYooper 2018-08-07
Pull that up Jamie
1 philoponeria 2018-08-07
But what is ratio?
1 TothB 2018-08-07
Sounds exactly like something from internet comment etiquette
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-08-07
I love watching all these conservatives fall over themselves to support government interference in business.
1 duckraul2 2018-08-07
If an idea is so good, why does it need government assistance???
1 geeses 2018-08-07
On the other side
Net Neutrality is good because it prevents internet providers from choosing who they allow on their network.
This is good because Facebook should be allowed to choose who is on their network.
1 CSharpApostle 2018-08-07
I dont think you know what net netrualitu is bucko
1 duckraul2 2018-08-07
unintentional anime
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-08-07
Correct. That way, if Alex wants to start gayfrogstube.com to host his own videos, he can.
Now if an ISP blocked gayfrogstube.com from being accessed, even I would take issue with it.
1 3E4K3RWRGZPR970NVH28 2018-08-07
No.
We should collectively decide that he's gone too far, and he needs to be "deplatformed" as you kids like to say.
90% of what he says is complete horseshit, he's endangering his own health, mentally and physically, the health of those people who believe the worst of what he says, and inciting people to have thoughts and beliefs that are grossly out of line with reality, and contributing to those people's lives and their loved ones to be much more miserable than it needs to be or should be.
1 TheWanderingVale 2018-08-07
But Republicans got rid of net neutrality, so they should be in favor of ISPs doing whatever they want, even if it means banning Alex Jones websites. He would have to lay his own wire lol, or just go back to crank mailers.
1 _Suprememe_ 2018-08-07
Oh man, I wish an ISP would do this, that would be so delicious.
1 better_bot 2018-08-07
Durrr, on the other side:
wtf facebook, why u no accept everyone on your platform?
hurrah Donald, kick them Mexicans out!
1 watermark02 2018-08-07
We forced businesses to open their doors to the blacks, now we must take that next step in the civil rights struggle and force them to open then to the klansman. Only then will we be truly free.
1 watermark02 2018-08-07
It's like forbidding the postal service from refusing to carry certain newspapers vs forcing the newspaper to accept certain ads.
1 ineedmorealts 2018-08-07
I mean kinda sort not really. There's a lot more to it than that.
Facebook isn't anything like an ISP tho
1 nicethingyoucanthave 2018-08-07
What she said on Twitter was stupid, but you're right about the hypocrisy from the left. It's also funny to compare this to the gay cake thing, and to their position on corporations in general (corporations not being people and therefore not having the exact same rights, vs. the argument that a corporation has 1st amendment rights).
There's also their stance on monopolies being bad.
They also usually love antitrust protections. The Shermon antitrust act is quite succinct. A "conspiracy" it says, ironically, which limits trade is illegal. Several companies conspiring together to prevent a crazy guy from selling crazy might be ruled illegal.
And if course, there's that supreme court case from a century ago where an entire town was owned by an oil company. The company put up "No solicitation" signs and tried to keep Mormons from going door-to-door. The company's arguments will sound very familiar: "we're not violating your freedom of religion because we're not the government- you're free to be Mormon anywhere you like, just not on our property." The court sided with the Mormons and prevented the company from kicking them out.
There's a chance a court would side with Jones based on the precedent above, or based on antitrust, or any number of other reasons. And if the tech companies were owned by right wingers and if they were censoring the left, these arguments would be all over the media.
1 siempreloco31 2018-08-07
1 nicethingyoucanthave 2018-08-07
1 siempreloco31 2018-08-07
1 nicethingyoucanthave 2018-08-07
Wait! No! That just makes you look stupid!
1 siempreloco31 2018-08-07
1 nicethingyoucanthave 2018-08-07
I know. I know that you're not retarded, but I'm correct in my assessment of you as someone who cannot defend the things he believes. You desperately want to say, "here's why you're wrong ____" and fill in the blank with something meaningful. But you can't, and that bothers you. So instead, you're doing this fake quote thing.
1 siempreloco31 2018-08-07
1 nicethingyoucanthave 2018-08-07
The thing is, you're never going to learn to defend yourself unless you try. You could try it here - shit, you could create an alt and try it!
Unless you make an effort to learn to defend yourself, all you're ever going to be able to do is hide behind these rhetorical straw men.
Have courage! I promise to be gentile with you.
1 siempreloco31 2018-08-07
1 nicethingyoucanthave 2018-08-07
It's normal to believe things very strongly. It's human nature. But what you ought to be able to do, on reaching adulthood, is go further than simple belief - you ought to be able to give a reason for the things you believe.
1 siempreloco31 2018-08-07
1 nicethingyoucanthave 2018-08-07
It's also very common to be defensive when someone highlights your failure to go further than simple belief. It's common, but that's no excuse. You ought to strive for more.
1 siempreloco31 2018-08-07
1 nicethingyoucanthave 2018-08-07
It's only when you choose to remain in that childish state, where you feel that you're right but don't test your beliefs exposing them and defending them - that's the only real failure.
1 banhminobanhyou 2018-08-07
Le debate me on r/drama
Fuck off retard
1 nicethingyoucanthave 2018-08-07
calm down Francis
1 Furious_Anteater 2018-08-07
You don't think monopolies are bad?
1 nicethingyoucanthave 2018-08-07
The mistake you're making here is assuming that my critique of the far left is a result of my personal politics.
I'm a liberal on many issues. I'm pro-choice, I'm in favor of universal basic income (have you heard of this guy? He makes a very compelling case), universal healthcare, strong environmental regulations, and yes, breaking up monopolies. Had the government not broken up AT&T for example, I firmly believe we would still all be using rotary phones that don't unplug from the wall.
On other issues, I'm conservative. For example, I'm big on the right to bear arms and freedom of speech (which is hilarious that this now makes me literally hitler). But the point is, you shouldn't read the post above as me saying, "here's a list of things that I disagree with."
Rather, you should read it as me pointing out what I see as hypocrisy. I really do believe that if these companies leaned right, and if they were banning leftists, there would be wall-to-wall media coverage making the case that they're monopolies that need to be broken up. Remember MicroSoft's antitrust case? At the time, MS was seen as being a standard evil corporation (which translates to, right-wing). So they got no love from the media. It's a really strange contrast to what's going on now. These companies are seen as staunchly left-leaning, so they're getting support.
...so long as they toe the line. I see this morning that Twitter has said it's not going to ban Infowars, and the left is hating on them.
1 Furious_Anteater 2018-08-07
Yeah, I more or less agree, The right would probably be praising it and saying they can do whatever they want since its a private business too. Political discussion these days is just yelling everything you can think of to see what sticks.
The idea of breaking them up is pretty interesting, I wonder how it could actually work. the main benefit of these social media sites is that everyone else is on them. Even if they were to split the accounts between the two new businesses everyone would just migrate towards one of them. In that sense maybe they should be a government regulated monopoly?
1 _Suprememe_ 2018-08-07
I'm don't agree that most of these tech giants can be hit with antitrust or be "broken up" in a way that makes sense, but I do agree with you that Google/Alphabet in particular is at the very least border-monopolistic. YouTube will never face any legitimate competition in the video sharing space as long as they enjoy a privileged relationship with their parent that dominates online advertising, has advanced cloud hosting infrastructure at its disposal, and seems willing to eat any of YouTube's losses. YouTube being spun off would solve a lot of problems and probably give its competitors a fighting chance.
1 SoldierofNod 2018-08-07
They love government power when it's directed at those they don't like. Even with policies like free trade, they shut up in the face of trade wars and tarriffs.
1 NormanImmanuel 2018-08-07
>ratio'd
You should take further security measures, OP.
1 Strictlybutters 2018-08-07
Be more online
1 CSharpApostle 2018-08-07
Verified blue check mark twitter users, rise up!!!! ✊✊✊
1 le_epic_xd 2018-08-07
Damn she's thick in the head. She can't understand even the "data" that she provides.
Once again several beatings are the cure to such retardation
1 roastieboi9828 2018-08-07
this just in, white woman doesn't understand things more at eleven
1 parameciidae 2018-08-07
If that is a real woman behind that account I will eat my MAGA hat.
1 BellyCrawler 2018-08-07
Eat that hat, ya lil' bitch.
1 Strictlybutters 2018-08-07
America needs better schools smh
1 pizzashill 2018-08-07
Schools can't fix conservatism.
1 Imgur_Lurker 2018-08-07
Ben Shapiro isn't considered a Giant by anyone, he's 5'3
He's not even playing a character like Ann Coulter the real genius
1 kippot 2018-08-07
yes yes we know he's a manlet.
are you trying to deny his influence on the shitstain that is the right wing?
1 Imgur_Lurker 2018-08-07
Please tell me more about how knowledgeable of the Right Wing you are Kippot
You aren't a uninformed raving lunatic who thinks a Jew is in charge of a bunch of racists
1 moudougou 2018-08-07
i don't get this argument, there are a lot racist jews
1 Imgur_Lurker 2018-08-07
You think racists care what the Jew thinks?
Top Tier Drama mind
1 moudougou 2018-08-07
racists jews care about what racists jews thinks yeah, and most mayos hate brown people more than they hate jews.
you're not the only racist on earth you know
1 Imgur_Lurker 2018-08-07
lol
sure surprised the guy who thinks Racist Jews is such a large population they could support Ben Shipros career is such a retard.
You're making no sense and aren't even intelligible
1 Zozbot 2018-08-07
zoz
1 Zozbot 2018-08-07
zle
1 Zozbot 2018-08-07
zozzle
1 moudougou 2018-08-07
zozzle
1 moudougou 2018-08-07
reading is hard but you must have missed this part:
1 Imgur_Lurker 2018-08-07
I don't read but keep posting your great posts
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-08-07
Out of the mouth of babes 🤔
1 Imgur_Lurker 2018-08-07
https://i.imgur.com/U7Ghu2s.gif
1 kippot 2018-08-07
like i'm gonna seriouspost with a centipedo ;)
1 CSharpApostle 2018-08-07
Kippot the unironic stalinist apologist. Purge of 1937 for you burgy scum
1 kippot 2018-08-07
oh yes, im a stalinist :D
nice one, weak ass coward mdegenerate
1 CSharpApostle 2018-08-07
Ur mom gay
1 kippot 2018-08-07
is this the mdegenerate "humor" i've been hearing about?
1 kibbot 2018-08-07
lmao mayocide now amirite??? :))))
1 kippot 2018-08-07
yes
1 hlary 2018-08-07
Based
1 kippot 2018-08-07
Insh'Allah brother!
1 AHealthySenseofDread 2018-08-07
Literally nothing else more so
1 OldOrder 2018-08-07
inshallah
1 CSharpApostle 2018-08-07
not one of those, but ok, since we playin the projecting game and i started it
1 kippot 2018-08-07
centipedo/mdegenerate whatever the fuck ever, just keep safe out there
1 CSharpApostle 2018-08-07
im gonna blast ur bussy in /r/drama meetup 2019 boyo
1 kippot 2018-08-07
you just keep on dreaming, incel manlet
1 CSharpApostle 2018-08-07
wow thats a yikes mydude
keep yourself safe in world of warcraft.
1 kippot 2018-08-07
Do you invoke lolcow protection?
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
We can't bully the retards too much, that's discrimination against a protected class.
1 kibbot 2018-08-07
haha yeah incel manlets!
1 kibbot 2018-08-07
fuck yeah stalin imprisoning all intellectuals and gays:)))
checkmate mdegenerates
1 kippot 2018-08-07
oh wow, this is a first for me!
thank you so much for letting me live rent free in your head :D
1 kibbot 2018-08-07
everyone lives rent free in communist utopia ;D
only chud mdegenerates refuse to accept that ;D ;D ;D
1 kippot 2018-08-07
you seem a bit bussyblasted?
1 kibbot 2018-08-07
lmao bussy :D
1 kippot 2018-08-07
so are you too much of a weak ass coward to post on your main or did you get banned for shitposting badly? i wonder
1 kibbot 2018-08-07
lmao mdgenerate incel chuds you know
stay safe out there ;)
1 kippot 2018-08-07
so you're a coward, got it
1 kibbot 2018-08-07
lol sounds like something a coward would say
1 kippot 2018-08-07
oh right, so I made an alt after I got mad at you?
1 kibbot 2018-08-07
lmao bussyblasted ;D
1 kippot 2018-08-07
you're really not good at this :/
1 kibbot 2018-08-07
i'm not good i'm incredible at this :/
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-08-07
Took me a second, I thought you were having a stroke
1 kippot 2018-08-07
ah yes i could have been more clear but i got so excited, fingers racing over the keyboard
1 watermark02 2018-08-07
Stalin was really able to rock that stache. There, I said it.
1 CSharpApostle 2018-08-07
Truth.
1 Denny_Craine 2018-08-07
Not knowing the meaning of words is the only way any aspect of contemporary conservatism makes sense.
1 ApugalypseNow 2018-08-07
"No one is illegal. They're undocumented." "Some women have penises. Get over it."
Which political beliefs are supported by misunderstanding what words mean again?
1 hexane360 2018-08-07
Two swings and misses
1 ApugalypseNow 2018-08-07
Thank you for illustrating my point.
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
Nor can it fix liberalism.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-08-07
🙄
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
Triggered are we?
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-08-07
Yes. Shitty bantz are a war crime
1 LadyVetinari 2018-08-07
lol
1 Strictlybutters 2018-08-07
Are you stuck in a time warp bucko?
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
Says the one that spends all their time in /r/Drama,
1 Strictlybutters 2018-08-07
Is that supposed to be an insult? This is some weak tea sweetie 😴
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
Hun it wasn't like yours was any stronger. Bud Light is a strong beer than your insult.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-08-07
Ummm sweaty
Adding this to my cringe Pinterest board
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
I didn't know you love me so much.
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
If the parade of mincing, boy-hungry "uncles" your mother kept bringing home can love you, practically anybody can.
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
Why so triggered?
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
I just complimented you, friendo. I realise this is novel for you. Maybe next time you'll respond appropriately. Yay you!
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
Na I think not.
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
It's very unlikely you'll ever get another compliment, true.
1 TigOleBittiesDotYum 2018-08-07
Do you actually have a cringe Pinterest board? Cause I’d follow the shit out of that.
1 ineedmorealts 2018-08-07
https://i.redd.it/ckactv2xkg311.jpg
1 pizzashill 2018-08-07
Liberalism isn't the problem. I get conservatives are increasingly upset over the fact they have no credible academics or intellectuals, valid policy goals, and they've lost every culture war for the last 40 years, but "both sides" are not the same.
That's just something conservatives repeat themselves to avoid admitting they're dumb people.
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
Well its a good thing I ain't a conservative then. And last time I check they are winning the current culture war, not like the democrats are doing much of anything to block republicans now are they? As far as academia goes you do realize academia is overall is against conservatism right? But hey the left is all about tolerance and more so diversity right?
1 2RetardedEven4Drama 2018-08-07
1 AHealthySenseofDread 2018-08-07
I don't understand. Did a child write this? Of course academia is against conservatism. Academia is reserved for people who know things and can orate them without dribbling dip spit into their overalls. If the left championing diversity means having to pretend your ideas aren't jaw dropping retarded then I guess call me Adolf and throw up a salute there chief.
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
Thanks for proving my point.
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
You don't have a point, you have fentanyl and an irregular number of chromosomes. They're not the same thing.
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
1/10. You got a one for attempt to troll.
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
Where do you think you are? 🤔 🤔 🤔
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
Apparently a sub full reddits trying to be edgy trolls and failing hard in the process.
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
You're seriousposting in /r/Drama. Maybe you should stop.
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
Whoosh.
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
No, petal, it's not a joke. Maybe you should stop.
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
So serious now? I was just starting.
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
Somehow I don't think that's the case. 🤔
1 snappleteadrink 2018-08-07
Academia makes me pay 40 dollars for a paper on bees lol
1 westofthetracks 2018-08-07
i dont think you know what a "culture war" is
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
No I don't think you do.
1 westofthetracks 2018-08-07
hint: culture wars are fought in the cultural sphere, and as such involve politicians only indirectly
1 _narrows 2018-08-07
But the results are measurable in who we elect and how we govern ourselves.
1 siempreloco31 2018-08-07
Who has more influence on American culture, the big four or the government?
1 _narrows 2018-08-07
I’m not sure who or what you mean by “the big four”. Can you clarify that?
1 siempreloco31 2018-08-07
Big four in tech. Or even FANG.
1 westofthetracks 2018-08-07
if this were true tipper gore would be an icon, not a punchline
1 BellyCrawler 2018-08-07
Every single cultural and social trend since WWII has gone the way of progressivism. You have no argument that's not stupid.
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
This sub seems to turn into /r/iamverysmart.
1 pizzashill 2018-08-07
If you think conservatives are winning any culture war you're more deluded than I had thought tbh.
Academia is against conservativism because it's a shit tier worldview that can't be supported with anything approaching facts.
1 CPT_Clarnence 2018-08-07
Praise be to Allah for fentanyl and type-2 diabetes.
Inshallah, some day we will all get to live in a world with far fewer flyover peasants dragging the rest of us down.
1 hobocactus 2018-08-07
One day it'll come out that the fentanyl crisis was engineered by the (((deep state))), and the world's faith in American government will be restored
1 GuillotinesNOW 2018-08-07
But but but muh DOCTOR Memerson!
1 kippot 2018-08-07
Ded
1 HP_civ 2018-08-07
wanting to fix liberalism as a conservative/Trumpist
the absolute state of burger education
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
Remember kids if you aren't with them you must be on the opposing side. FYI I ain't pro trump or conservative, I am worse than either of those things.
1 Assy-McGee 2018-08-07
you’re an admitted pedofile then?
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-08-07
You can't just ask someone if their a libertarian...
1 Assy-McGee 2018-08-07
he’s an an-cap, not a lolbertarian. They’re almost two completely similar things
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-08-07
Is this like pedos and eboheebogreebophiles?
1 Assy-McGee 2018-08-07
more like Amerimutts claiming to be “white” when they’re only half Potato-Nigger 🇨🇮
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
Other way round, surely? The generic white mutts always pretend to be full-potato on St Paddy's day and that's it.
1 FalseBed 2018-08-07
An cao? That's a new one for me.
1 BellyCrawler 2018-08-07
He's a male feminist
1 TheButtholeOfBravery 2018-08-07
school is for fuckin nerds lmao
1 TotesMessenger 2018-08-07
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 GuillotinesNOW 2018-08-07
School is for the gays and libs, though.
1 myshl0ng 2018-08-07
No thx
1 snowmanbg 2018-08-07
White, Christian and American...at least not a pedo (I hope).
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-08-07
We need to bring back eugenism.
1 Snakeyez 2018-08-07
Too late.
https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1500/61/1500614780578.jpg
1 moudougou 2018-08-07
wow the baby is the smuggest one
1 BellyCrawler 2018-08-07
Man, that baby got the worst of both parents' features huh.
1 Denny_Craine 2018-08-07
She married Smeagol?
1 -Mopsus- 2018-08-07
There's a bunch of posts about Millie on The Dirty from like 6 or 7 years ago.
She apparently started gold digging at a pretty young age, and I think this guy is actually her second husband.
1 Snakeyez 2018-08-07
She's definitely getting some attention from this shitshow. I had no idea who she was.
1 watermark02 2018-08-07
This is like the ugliest conservathot I've seen. Come on there has to be more to it than being blonde and throwing in a red cap. Have some standards guys. Lauren Southern is A++, I would literally pretend to be a Trump supporter so that I could get rejected by her. This? Nah.
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
Somehow unsurprisingly, the hottest Trump supporter is actually an immigrant 😂 😂 😂
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2018-08-07
LOL her husband is like 30 years older than her hahahahaha what a useless whore
1 Michaelbama 2018-08-07
That baby looks like the embodiment of "my father will hear of this"
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
Funny, I just thought it was missing chromosomes.
1 Chanchumaetrius 2018-08-07
she married Evil Jeff Goldblum?
1 kippot 2018-08-07
the absolute state of centipedos
1 VidiotGamer 2018-08-07
I think we found the source of the retardation.
1 Denny_Craine 2018-08-07
I must be getting old because I didn't understand half the words in your title
The fact that right wingers screech about privatization and don't even know what private ownership means is pretty unsurprising though
1 3E4K3RWRGZPR970NVH28 2018-08-07
I'm on a slightly different part of the "spectrum". I'm becoming ashamed of myself for even recognizing part of them.
1 VioletBroregarde 2018-08-07
A better version of this take is that they've accepted too much government money and too many kickbacks and tax breaks to qualify as private
1 CSharpApostle 2018-08-07
The only argument i see that its public space is that there will never be a rival to facebook that isnt its own thing entirely, unless it was state supported. It would be like reinventing the wooden plane and showing everyoje you can fly
1 McFluffTheCrimeCat 2018-08-07
MySpace would like a word with you.
1 watermark02 2018-08-07
Myspace was like a weird prototype, halfway between geocities and facebook.
1 SoldierofNod 2018-08-07
Not necessarily. Everything crumbles and falls eventually. The question is just if it's within a timespan relevant to our life, and I think this one will be.
1 VioletBroregarde 2018-08-07
It unquestionably is, and you've identified the reason why. The internet is analogous to a physical location. Banning people from your site is equivalent to blocking them from all the conversations happening anywhere, especially if your site is as big as Twitter and YouTube. The constitution wasn't designed with the internet in mind and we need extra protections so that rich assholes with friends in the media can't memory-hole whoever they want.
1 rekt_brownie 2018-08-07
Then most of the Fortune 500 is public
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2018-08-07
But taxation is theft.
1 parameciidae 2018-08-07
Kind of like what Obama was going for when he said: "you didn't build that"?
1 CSharpApostle 2018-08-07
What a dumb ho. Just straight up DUM DUM
Straight STOOPID. Dumb ass BROAD. WOW!
Public doesnt own those servers, bye bye sweety!
1 e-guy 2018-08-07
I know someone can be horrible and still be right about basic facts, but I still feel immensely dirty being on his side.
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2018-08-07
At least he has good taste in hentai.
1 NNewtoma 2018-08-07
Truuuuu
1 _Suprememe_ 2018-08-07
She makes a convincing argument for repealing women's suffrage.
1 IamSwedishSuckMyNuts 2018-08-07
'ohnoesitsretarded.jpeg'
1 schoolboystirner 2018-08-07
I hope more women realize that there's mountains of patreonbucks waiting to be made off of thirsty rightoids.
1 SoldierofNod 2018-08-07
It's ironic how morons from both the right and left will crowd around figureheads.
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
Americans are notorious for this.
1 watermark02 2018-08-07
Where can I donate to her patreon?
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-08-07
That strip joint behind Applebee's
1 BeingofUniverse 2018-08-07
She probably trips over the pole.
1 grungebot5000 2018-08-07
I don’t know what’s better, her pre-6th-grade understanding of economics or her confidence about the whole thing
1 ShinJoe 2018-08-07
She's right, of course. You look at websites that ban Democrats and they get sued. Eharmony didn't allow fags and got sued. Starbucks can't ask a black person to leave when they are loitering without getting sued. But the government can call these companies in front of Congress and sanction them if they don't do what they say. It's state sponsored censorship. Hopefully, Trump gets to put this new Supreme Court together and restores our Constitution.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-08-07
Shit-tier bait
1 ShinJoe 2018-08-07
Shit-tier post by someone who is undoubtable in the majority of Democrats who support criminalizing speech.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-08-07
Your heart's not in it
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
Too much fentanyl or too little?
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-08-07
I think they get crabby when it's too little
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2018-08-07
You're just tossing the entire fishing pole in m8.
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
Wew.
1 TheRobidog 2018-08-07
Mate, you're not allowed to ban people on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender or sexuality, but you definitely are allowed to ban them for their political stance.
1 shallowm 2018-08-07
o i am laffin
1 shallowm 2018-08-07
o i am laffin
1 LawsCoolStudent 2018-08-07
Andddd she resorted to the battlecry of all Conservatives who even begin to realize they might be wrong about something...
"TRUMP IS YOUR PRESIDENT REEEE"
Amazing, it's always like a script.
1 reactor4 2018-08-07
It's hard to argue with someone that stupid.
1 BuckRowdy 2018-08-07
It's so easy to make money off the conservatives.
1 Cauchemar89 2018-08-07
I'm surprised how she hasn't been banned or deverified yet considering she's wearing a MAGA-hat on her Twitterprofile.
1 Hemingwavy 2018-08-07
1 Raiden-666 2018-08-07
Apparently she is a "jounalist" for infowars.
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
Every goddamned time.
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
I'm too retarded to figure out how. Plz demonstrate.
1 ComedicSans 2018-08-07
Michael Hutchence was an early believer in the Mayocide. He'd be cool to hang with.
1 PCMRisacirclejerk 2018-08-07
no government interference in business - epic conservative
can the government interfere and prevent facebook from banning alex jones - also epic conservative
1 Raiden-666 2018-08-07
Lol she work for infowars.... that say a lot!
1 ShitPsychologist 2018-08-07
Pretending Facebook is a platform and not a publisher is dishonest.
1 Ikea_Man 2018-08-07
where the hell do they find these women
did Dad not fuck them hard enough or something