Libertarians calmly, and rationally, discuss the advantage of socialised healthcare.

16  2018-08-14 by God_Of_Sky

12 comments

I don't give a fuck how much you call your flimsy delusions "enlightenment." There is no amount of ceaseless self-deception that will make you accept the charred hellscape of being a miserable useless destitute fucking junkie piece of shit. You know what you are, and it is deeply ugly on every level.

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, removeddit.com, archive.is

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

You can either have socialized healthcare or you can have the right to be fat. Choose one.

Being fat and uneducated is a time honored American tradition! And I’ll be fucked raw before I let you commie libtards take that from me.

Does Canada not have a right to be fat? Geez I wonder how they do it up there because it's logically impossible?

Imagine willingly choosing a wildly inefficient system that will inevitably eat up like 90% of your nations GDP because of the mere possibility that some small fraction of your funds might go to fat people. When no modern insurance even charge more to fat people anyway and you're just retarded. God rightists are dumb as bricks.

Math is not your strong suit. If 90% of America's GDP were spent on health care, we would all have had liposuction and tummy tucks by now.

And some pretty sweet tits!

The government can NEVER take away my thiccness.

Other socialized healthcare systems follow a triage approach, which most Americans would not tolerate. It's not like we make low priority or elective surgery procedures wait with our socialized medicine (Medicare, Medicaid, state programs for children). Telling Americans to wait in line until funds/resources free up for their procedure or that they can't have the best drugs covered by the state would be a shit storm.

It's wild how often I see this stupid shit repeated lol.

The US "rations" healthcare as well, we just do it via the ability to pay. Many Americans, as in likely MOST Americans do not seek medical attention for most things because they can not afford it.

My favorite argument is when they say America is too big of a country to have universal healthcare. I mean Europe is literally twice as populated and somehow manages to do it, but for the American government it's utterly impossible for some reason.

I guess it makes sense considering how many right-wing nutjobs live there, but still.

It can be worse than the current system for individuals. I'm not sure why libtards ignore that. When you end up paying more for lesser services to cover other people, the individual is worse off. Why would they have lesser services? Not all services will be covered even if you need them. They attempt to maximize the benefit of everyone or at least those politically expedient to do so and the rest are required to pay more to take on for the team.

No healthcare = more mayocide.

I don't understand the problem.

Single payer healthcare, objectively, is superior and better for society than the current healthcare system.

I get conservatives tend to have poor cognitive ability and aren't so capable of thinking long-term, but yeah.

In regard to the totesmessenger bot crosspost link:

Honestly, that place just has the most self righteous smug tone to it. I can't stand it.