For anyone reading this, archive.is is probably the highest trafficked archiving site on reddit, and only receives few donations per week (and definitely not enough to run on donations alone). If you can, you can support the creator on Liberapay in order to make sure we have this service for the future.
based on a casual observation pulled from my ass, you seem to be emotionally invested in his confirmation. care to comment why it matters so much Kavabrah gets a seat as opposed to some other less-rapey judge?
/u/Alexlincoln2 is a pretty good drama poster because he doesn't take anything posted here serious. But this Kavabrewbrah Judge Raep stuff seems to have put a real stick up his ass and I want to know why
If you're not constantly serious posting you're a milquetoast faggot that thinks not having opinions makes you above it all when it really just makes you uninteresting.
Not emotionally really. If this was a democrat (for instance the Keith Ellison accusers also lack evidence) I'd feel the same way. Moving from a preponderance of evidence standard based on a presumption of innocence to a males are always guilty (as senator Hirono stated) would ruin all future appointments. It's not kavanaugh thays at risk, I feel the Republicans will side with him to the end at this point. It's the system of government itself that I feel is at risk. I hope the FBI report, as narrow as it can be at this point owing to the politicization of this case is effective in ending this nightmare.
That's not what he was saying, though. He was making the point that his principles are consistent, not "lul demos are hypocrites and would do the same".
I know it's hard to believe some people have principles in this day and age, but it do.
he should have been constantly bitching about Merrick Garland for the past few years, but it's only when Kavabrah got held up he started to whine about principles .
You can't claim "both sides are bad" when you only REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE when the side you don't like uses underhanded tactics
Merrick Garland didn't get a vote by a Republican controlled Senate. If you want the option of not bringing a nominee to a vote, then go get control of the Senate. Or I guess you could just accuse all trump nominees of raping babies to cure their aids. Either way.
if you seriously think /r/politics are 'playing the both sides card' you're more retarded than anyone else here. they froth at the mouth at that line of thinking.
and it's funny because it's not even a cringey trope, it's true. if you have the correct number of chromosomes you should be able to see fucktardery comes from all walks of life. the dems can't seem to stop spiraling down the hole of 'social progression' and the reps can't seem to stop getting caught doing egregious shit and being religious as fuck
these dipshits impeached a sitting Pres because he got a consensual blowjob from an adult after not finding the smoking gun in the real estate deals they investigated.
and Kavadrunk was right there demanding it be investigated.
But now we cant investigate RAPE because it will imperil future bla blas?
Please, if you could be so kind, point out in the above comment where I said it shouldn't be investigated. My bussy has a stick up its ass which prevents me from finding it, but I'm sure you can find it.
you realize that Trump has been all over the media insisting this is all lies, right?
why when Trump insists all these people are lying before he's even heard there testimony thats okay. But when one senator listens to testimony and decides its believable that somehow is risking the very system of gov we all believe in?
That's wrong as well. The difference is simple. Doing something wrong and it failing is far less destructive than doing something wrong and it works. Now, as I said, if evidence does come up that could prove kavanaugh did sexually assault ford, or, much more likely, that he simply perjured himself, then by all means, impeach kavanaugh.
It should be noted that the official reason Clinton was impeached was for perjury, which he was disbarred for. If you can prove that Kavanaugh was lying, please impeach him.
these dipshits impeached a sitting Pres because he got a consensual blowjob from an adult after not finding the smoking gun in the real estate deals they investigated
This was only possible because of Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick and ..... fuck it I just realized "Broad" is her name and I feel uncomfortable :-(
Clinton's original rise to fame was literally a version of Trump ... like v0.35 or something. Back in his 1992 first Democratic presidential primary, his affair with Gennifer Flowers came was unveiled. He survived the scandal, and it won him that coveted thing that Trump needed - name recognition, and air time. Over the course of whenever, several more have happened from vary angles. One of them is literally right now twittering shit about Clinton.
Because of these, Clinton earned a reputation as a lech and Republicans locked onto their one fake Christiany thing they pound on - sexual morality.
The impeachment was simply a continuation of "GET CLINTON" from the original 1992 scandal.
Remember when Democrats willingly ignored (continue to ignore) Bill Clinton’s continuous litany of sexual assaults, trashing the victims as dumb lying sluts and calling the Republicans prudes for finding anything wrong with it. Judith Butler said “it’s good to have a president who’s alive below the waist.” Every single feminist and Democrat who defended Bill Clinton (all of them) is a scum sack hypocrite.
Didn't Billy boy actually get accused of raping some lady, and Hillary helped cover it up? But like, as a grown ass man, not as a 17 year old grabbing a titty?
Moving from a preponderance of evidence standard based on a presumption of innocence to a males are always guilty (as senator Hirono stated) would ruin **all** future appointments on both sides.
I appreciate the fact that in your "future", women are disallowed from serving on SCOTUS.
He has no right to that seat at all. Supreme Court Justices should be held to a higher standard since that seat is for life. Dems were even angrier about the Gorsuch seat since they saw it as "stolen" and no rape accusations came out against him. Repubs should pick someone less rapey and move on.
if you think he's actually rapey you must be a committed /r/politics poster on an alt, there is no other reason for you to think so besides having an extreme anti-daddy complex
No, the variety of investigation, a background check, is being performed again. This isn't a criminal investigation owing to it not being an allegation based around a federal crime (say, interstate rape) or occurring at a federal institution.
Yes it is true; however, artificial ones are put in surgically. The artificial tear ducts have to be used sparingly because they look odd compared to human tear ducts
112 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-09-29
For anyone reading this, archive.is is probably the highest trafficked archiving site on reddit, and only receives few donations per week (and definitely not enough to run on donations alone). If you can, you can support the creator on Liberapay in order to make sure we have this service for the future.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-09-29
For the 6th time
1 Assy-McGee 2018-09-29
For the 1st time xxxDDDDDDDDDDDD
1 Assy-McGee 2018-09-29
based on a casual observation pulled from my ass, you seem to be emotionally invested in his confirmation. care to comment why it matters so much Kavabrah gets a seat as opposed to some other less-rapey judge?
1 alot_the_murdered 2018-09-29
Personally I just want to see the /r/politics meltdown continue uninterrupted through the midterms.
1 Assy-McGee 2018-09-29
/u/Alexlincoln2 is a pretty good drama poster because he doesn't take anything posted here serious. But this Kavabrewbrah Judge Raep stuff seems to have put a real stick up his ass and I want to know why
1 Chin_Up_Chick 2018-09-29
well, I guess that would make sense you're concerned with someone else's asshole, assy mcgee.
1 WorkingMessage3 2018-09-29
If you're not constantly serious posting you're a milquetoast faggot that thinks not having opinions makes you above it all when it really just makes you uninteresting.
1 Assy-McGee 2018-09-29
/r/SubredditDrama loves people like you. go post there plz thnx
1 WorkingMessage3 2018-09-29
no u
1 Assy-McGee 2018-09-29
I would but I'm banned. You go do it in my stead
1 Whaddaulookinat 2018-09-29
What finally got you assy?
1 Assy-McGee 2018-09-29
I advocated for white genocide facetiously, but because SRDine mods can't into humour, took me at face value
1 Whaddaulookinat 2018-09-29
They didn't understand it would be a slow, peaceful, and fun endeavour?
1 [deleted] 2018-09-29
[removed]
1 GandalftheChromatic 2018-09-29
It does though
1 WorkingMessage3 2018-09-29
Nuh uh!
1 GandalftheChromatic 2018-09-29
Uh huh!
1 22333444455555666666 2018-09-29
this is the most true thing i've read all day
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-09-29
Not emotionally really. If this was a democrat (for instance the Keith Ellison accusers also lack evidence) I'd feel the same way. Moving from a preponderance of evidence standard based on a presumption of innocence to a males are always guilty (as senator Hirono stated) would ruin all future appointments. It's not kavanaugh thays at risk, I feel the Republicans will side with him to the end at this point. It's the system of government itself that I feel is at risk. I hope the FBI report, as narrow as it can be at this point owing to the politicization of this case is effective in ending this nightmare.
1 Assy-McGee 2018-09-29
Al Franken got booted from the Senate by his own party for less
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-09-29
Indeed
1 Assy-McGee 2018-09-29
Don't do "le both sides are ebil!"like some /r/politics poster then
1 grungebot5000 2018-09-29
well i think he’s saying booting al franken is evil
1 Zeriell 2018-09-29
That's not what he was saying, though. He was making the point that his principles are consistent, not "lul demos are hypocrites and would do the same".
I know it's hard to believe some people have principles in this day and age, but it do.
1 Assy-McGee 2018-09-29
he should have been constantly bitching about Merrick Garland for the past few years, but it's only when Kavabrah got held up he started to whine about principles .
You can't claim "both sides are bad" when you only REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE when the side you don't like uses underhanded tactics
1 take_a_dumpling 2018-09-29
Merrick Garland didn't get a vote by a Republican controlled Senate. If you want the option of not bringing a nominee to a vote, then go get control of the Senate. Or I guess you could just accuse all trump nominees of raping babies to cure their aids. Either way.
1 Zeriell 2018-09-29
Ask yourself which is worse: not getting a chance at a vote you know you will lose, or sabotaging a nomination that is otherwise a sure thing.
The Merrick Garland stuff would have been a good justification if somehow Democrats otherwise had the votes to confirm him, but they didn't.
1 PM_ME_UR_SUSPICIONS 2018-09-29
No u
1 escebar_ortez 2018-09-29
if you seriously think /r/politics are 'playing the both sides card' you're more retarded than anyone else here. they froth at the mouth at that line of thinking.
and it's funny because it's not even a cringey trope, it's true. if you have the correct number of chromosomes you should be able to see fucktardery comes from all walks of life. the dems can't seem to stop spiraling down the hole of 'social progression' and the reps can't seem to stop getting caught doing egregious shit and being religious as fuck
1 Bluest_waters 2018-09-29
for hover hands
HOVER FUCKING HANDS !
fucking unreal
1 cmakk1012 2018-09-29
ooh this post is far too serious for this sub, you run the risk of developing lolcowism if you keep this up
1 Prysorra2 2018-09-29
That's probably an even better example for the Republitards.
1 Bluest_waters 2018-09-29
GIMME A FUCKING BREAK!
these dipshits impeached a sitting Pres because he got a consensual blowjob from an adult after not finding the smoking gun in the real estate deals they investigated.
and Kavadrunk was right there demanding it be investigated.
But now we cant investigate RAPE because it will imperil future bla blas?
fuck off
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-09-29
Please, if you could be so kind, point out in the above comment where I said it shouldn't be investigated. My bussy has a stick up its ass which prevents me from finding it, but I'm sure you can find it.
1 Bluest_waters 2018-09-29
you said the sytem of gov is at risk if this is investigated
or maybe its at risk some other fucking way?
1 [deleted] 2018-09-29
[removed]
1 Bluest_waters 2018-09-29
you realize that Trump has been all over the media insisting this is all lies, right?
why when Trump insists all these people are lying before he's even heard there testimony thats okay. But when one senator listens to testimony and decides its believable that somehow is risking the very system of gov we all believe in?
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-09-29
That's wrong as well. The difference is simple. Doing something wrong and it failing is far less destructive than doing something wrong and it works. Now, as I said, if evidence does come up that could prove kavanaugh did sexually assault ford, or, much more likely, that he simply perjured himself, then by all means, impeach kavanaugh.
1 Bluest_waters 2018-09-29
wtf are you talking about?
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-09-29
On what point?
1 froibo 2018-09-29
Niggas going to jail if he lied. You can't impeach a judge.
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-09-29
You can impeach a supreme court justice, it's happened before to samuel chase. After impeachment he would go to jail yes
1 froibo 2018-09-29
Interesting, havn't heard of that before.
1 CherryKirsche 2018-09-29
Lol, that was weak.
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-09-29
It should be noted that the official reason Clinton was impeached was for perjury, which he was disbarred for. If you can prove that Kavanaugh was lying, please impeach him.
1 Bluest_waters 2018-09-29
ah yes, perjury regarding being questioned about consensual sex with an adult.
you know whe else committed perjury and the Repubs somehow didn't give a fuck?
Kavadrunk
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/17/did-brett-kavanaugh-give-false-testimony-under-oath/?utm_term=.4fac0422e76f
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-09-29
Hey man, I know you want a gotcha moment here, but did you actually read the politifacts article you linked, it says Durbin is in the wrong here.
1 Bluest_waters 2018-09-29
its wapo about kavadrunk
wtf are you talking about?
1 nybbas 2018-09-29
Read what he said again. Read the two words after politifacts and before you.
He is saying the article you linked is counter to your point.
1 VidiotGamer 2018-09-29
You can agree that both a) they shouldn't have been investigating his blow jobs and b) he shouldn't have lied under oath.
It's not that hard to be logically consistent, give it a try some time.
1 nybbas 2018-09-29
Did you even read that article? It is literally saying the opposite of what your point is.
1 Prysorra2 2018-09-29
This was only possible because of Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick and ..... fuck it I just realized "Broad" is her name and I feel uncomfortable :-(
1 Bluest_waters 2018-09-29
?
those 2 had nothing to do with the impeachment thingy
1 Prysorra2 2018-09-29
Clinton's original rise to fame was literally a version of Trump ... like v0.35 or something. Back in his 1992 first Democratic presidential primary, his affair with Gennifer Flowers came was unveiled. He survived the scandal, and it won him that coveted thing that Trump needed - name recognition, and air time. Over the course of whenever, several more have happened from vary angles. One of them is literally right now twittering shit about Clinton.
Because of these, Clinton earned a reputation as a lech and Republicans locked onto their one fake Christiany thing they pound on - sexual morality.
The impeachment was simply a continuation of "GET CLINTON" from the original 1992 scandal.
1 xcallmesunshine 2018-09-29
Ya Bill must be like "wtf" right now
1 HavnFunOnTheInternet 2018-09-29
Remember when Democrats willingly ignored (continue to ignore) Bill Clinton’s continuous litany of sexual assaults, trashing the victims as dumb lying sluts and calling the Republicans prudes for finding anything wrong with it. Judith Butler said “it’s good to have a president who’s alive below the waist.” Every single feminist and Democrat who defended Bill Clinton (all of them) is a scum sack hypocrite.
1 MG87 2018-09-29
What about what about what about
1 nybbas 2018-09-29
Didn't Billy boy actually get accused of raping some lady, and Hillary helped cover it up? But like, as a grown ass man, not as a 17 year old grabbing a titty?
1 SmurfPrivilege 2018-09-29
I appreciate the fact that in your "future", women are disallowed from serving on SCOTUS.
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-09-29
Hmm, that is a mistake on my part. I was pointing out am example of believing the accuser that was more specific than my fear.
1 GasTheBlues 2018-09-29
We can only hope.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-09-29
He has no right to that seat at all. Supreme Court Justices should be held to a higher standard since that seat is for life. Dems were even angrier about the Gorsuch seat since they saw it as "stolen" and no rape accusations came out against him. Repubs should pick someone less rapey and move on.
1 better_bot 2018-09-29
Which is what every sane person has been saying since America elected a reality tv star to the highest office in the land.
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-09-29
You aren't wrong,
1 Punished_Eva 2018-09-29
if you think he's actually rapey you must be a committed /r/politics poster on an alt, there is no other reason for you to think so besides having an extreme anti-daddy complex
1 Assy-McGee 2018-09-29
no thanks
1 Strictlybutters 2018-09-29
Wait,Her allegation was investigated 6 times?
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-09-29
No, the variety of investigation, a background check, is being performed again. This isn't a criminal investigation owing to it not being an allegation based around a federal crime (say, interstate rape) or occurring at a federal institution.
1 Strictlybutters 2018-09-29
Right, it isn’t a criminal investigation because rape isn’t a federal crime. But unlike the previous background investigations (which are usually mere formalities) this one is limited in scope to the, "current credible allegations," according to the statement from the Senate committee. That classification would fall under "any kind of allegation where there are witnesses that can be interviewed and any kind of information that can be gathered to determine whether the allegations are true or false," which the FBI hasn’t specifically investigated before.
1 Alexlincoln2 2018-09-29
True.
1 wow___justwow 2018-09-29
surprisingly accurate summary, for a retard
1 Alicesnakebae 2018-09-29
Can the crybaby beat Hilary's record
1 MooseHeckler 2018-09-29
They both are crybabies.
1 JackalJonesIV 2018-09-29
https://i.imgur.com/ZsJXm4y.gif
1 MooseHeckler 2018-09-29
Ok one is a killer cyborg from the future the other is a rapist.
1 grungebot5000 2018-09-29
there we go
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-09-29
Fam she didn't cry during her hearings like a little bitch
1 MooseHeckler 2018-09-29
Still frightening and untrustworthy.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-09-29
She is many things, but crybaby is not one of them. I don't think Hillary is capable of feelings.
1 MooseHeckler 2018-09-29
She is however capable of insider trading.
1 MissionNobody 2018-09-29
I'd like to make a trade to get access to her insides ca 1962 if you catch my drift ;)
1 MooseHeckler 2018-09-29
Ayy Lamo.
1 preserved_fish 2018-09-29
She was much better-looking than any of Bill's floozies, or at least the ones who came out publicly. I guess you can take the boy out of Arkansas...
1 MissionNobody 2018-09-29
I'm not American, but I assume Arkansas boys are high-T?
1 preserved_fish 2018-09-29
For thicc trashy women, but not bougie WASPs, apparently.
1 MissionNobody 2018-09-29
I wouldn't say no to miss Lewinsky though. She's so sweet :)
1 preserved_fish 2018-09-29
She had a certain thing going on, but it wasn't exactly what I'd describe as "pretty."
1 MissionNobody 2018-09-29
What's the kind of pussy you'd prefer to grab then, Mr President?
1 preserved_fish 2018-09-29
A friend of mine was a staffer on Clinton's 1996 campaign, and scuttlebutt was that he was schtupping Sharon Stone, who was on the trail with him.
1 Tyestor 2018-09-29
ah yes, Hillary before the lizardmen flayed her and started wearing her skin.
1 Zykium 2018-09-29
It's the lizard blood.
1 NAGOLACOLA 2018-09-29
The Reptilians don’t have tear ducts.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-09-29
Don't be ableist pls 🦎
1 uniqueguy263 2018-09-29
/u/Cdace can u confirm
1 Cdace 2018-09-29
Yes it is true; however, artificial ones are put in surgically. The artificial tear ducts have to be used sparingly because they look odd compared to human tear ducts
1 Fnhatic 2018-09-29
She did cry on November 8th.
1 wow___justwow 2018-09-29
wow your toxic masculinity is dangling
1 VidiotGamer 2018-09-29
Please, lizard people don't have tear ducts.
1 MooseHeckler 2018-09-29
True
1 redblaze17 2018-09-29
Magic 8 ball says yes.
1 The_DHC 2018-09-29
Should have nominated 6ix9ine smdh
1 LightUmbra 2018-09-29
Yikes
1 bigberthaboy 2018-09-29
Ur old
1 Bluest_waters 2018-09-29
here's my idea
Bill Cosby is in a bit of legal trouble but still beloved. Trump pardons him, Kavadrunk steps down, and Trump nominate Cosby!
boom !
everybody wins
1 Assy-McGee 2018-09-29
I don't know where you came from, but you need to go back
1 grungebot5000 2018-09-29
this would actually be a best-case scenario
which makes it impossible
1 JustLions 2018-09-29
No written decisions, just Dr. Huxtable making a sandwich and sitting down with the appellant and respondent to work if out.
Justice, at last.
1 BussyShillBot 2018-09-29
Eat shit
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-09-29
It's over for incels
1 PM_ME_HAIRLESS_CATS 2018-09-29
Dude bussy lmao
1 westofthetracks 2018-09-29
if theyd just let trump nominate judge judy like he wanted to none of this would be happening now
1 MG87 2018-09-29
Betrayed by Daddy himself