a lot of them are the alt-right mirror images of our tankie edgelord teens, and a lot of people there are broken, toxic people and their parasites who exploit and humiliate them for sociopathic fun
A hoax paper for the Journal of Poetry Therapy describes monthly feminist spirituality meetings, complete with a* “womb room,” *and discusses six poems, which Mr. Lindsay *generated by algorithm *and lightly edited.
I wish this was the post instead of the living cancer of the anti-SJW clickbait YouTube video. I didn't have to watch through a thousand Patreon begs. I just had to go incognito.
the paper claims dog parks are “petri dishes for canine ‘rape culture’ ” and issues “a call for awareness into the different ways dogs are treated on the basis of their gender and queering behaviors, and the chronic and perennial rape emergency dog parks pose to female dogs.”
I have two degrees in the humanities, and I somehow managed to avoid the stereotypical humanities professor. I feel like most, if not all, of the profs I had were pretty great and would be able to sniff out bullshit like this.
The only professor I had who was overtly political during lectures was actually a biology professor, and everybody would get extremely annoyed by his tangents, because it wasted class time. At the same time though he was very anti-islam, because he was a gay former Muslim, and refused to go by his first of Mohammed.
If he's a citizen of another country, he'd have to change his name in that country as far as I know and some countries don't allow you to change your name at will.
For example in Belgium you need to have a 'good reason' to change your name or it may get rejected.
This is why people just flat-out don't trust academia.
The bullshit of the soft 'sciences' is destroying faith in the hard ones. Experts clearly aren't expert in anything but sniffing their own asses, and the people in charge of the whole thing are so overly biased that they accept obvious nonsense so long as they find it flattering.
You can't do better academia with this things. The whole thing is gilled of bias, fuck it might even require bias. This is not just a thing on the left, back in the 50s social scientist swore up and down how horror comics wete gonna lead to the downfall of society yet here we are.
in the 50s social scientist swore up and down how horror comics wete gonna lead to the downfall of society
​
Those social scientists did succeed in killing comics, you have to give it to them
​
Had it not been for that campaign, comics would most likely not be the superhero monoculture that they are today in the US (and that is increasing infecting Europe too, which largely kept out of this idiocy until the end of the 20th century). Movies would be in better shape too, and people wouldn't be such zombies...
There are hundreds of universities publishing tens of thousands of papers. Most of them are not going to be very good, and it has developed into an issue of incompetent individuals being awards degrees they would not have earned if held to a proper academic standard.
Keep in mind that you are not allowed anymore to state the basic biological fact that there are two sexes in Homo sapiens...
And in most STEM departments you have diversity quotas when it comes to hiring and promotions, which are having major negative impact on the morale of the people working there.
Making a case that women are currently being unfairly advantaged in academic hiring practices and being banned for that viewpoint != "You can't even say there are two genders!!!1!!"
Mr. Boghossian doesn’t have tenure and expects the university will fire or otherwise punish him. Ms. Pluckrose predicts she’ll have a hard time getting accepted to a doctoral program. Mr. Lindsay said he expects to become “an academic pariah,” barred from professorships or publications.
Yet Mr. Lindsay says the project is worth it: “For us, the risk of letting biased research continue to influence education, media, policy and culture is far greater than anything that will happen to us for having done this.”
Yeah that's garbage though. They're playing the outrage game. If they want professorships in feminism and anti-racism (a real thing) then I bet they won't get it. If they want professorships in a real academic field they probably will.
That's because they published to trash journals. They'll essentially publish anything as long as you pay. Everybody I know would be glad to see these burn.
This is more comparable to the Sokal affair, but Sokal didn't actually publish in a field that's close to his own. I mean, when their original hoax got rejected, they instead set out to write papers that looked like the real thing. That's pretty deceptive.
Of course it's deceptive, but it's not like they reporting fake science with fake numbers and experiments though. This shit is all masturbatory hogwash to begin with.
Lol they're pre-cultivating outrage incase one of these losers doesn't get an amazing position in an academic environment that is already heavily competitive.
It’s funny, but it’s not just an “underwater basket weaving” thing. There were a group of computer science professors a few years back who made an algorithm that generated absolute bullshit CS papers and got those published too.
Note that these are not "marginal journals" as some will claim
Hypatia is indeed the leading feminist philosophy journal, and they got two papers there...
Most of the other journals are top in their "fields" too -- I have done some research on these topics in the past, and you get a pretty good idea about journal rankings from following the citations trees.
Which is not to say that there aren't many marginal feminist journals -- there are hundreds of them. But that hardly a reason to feel good about the state of things...
86 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-10-03
leave that place it isn't worth it
a lot of them are the alt-right mirror images of our tankie edgelord teens, and a lot of people there are broken, toxic people and their parasites who exploit and humiliate them for sociopathic fun
just a really bad community all around
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2018-10-03
http://archive.is/BRph3
Article on them
1 PM_SUCCUBUS_EROTICA 2018-10-03
I hope this article is a troll. If not this is horrifying.
1 RollBread 2018-10-03
It is not, and it is not that surprising given that bad research seems to be a running theme of the last ten years.
1 Chromosome-21 2018-10-03
😂😂😂holy shit
1 odintal 2018-10-03
Hilarious and sad at the same time.
1 cavides 2018-10-03
1 GadolBoobies 2018-10-03
Jesus, they even called it "My Struggle'?
1 captainktainer 2018-10-03
I wish this was the post instead of the living cancer of the anti-SJW clickbait YouTube video. I didn't have to watch through a thousand Patreon begs. I just had to go incognito.
1 SignalEvent 2018-10-03
It's a conspiracy
1 Sojir 2018-10-03
It's not available in my country. What is the jist ?
1 32624647 2018-10-03
The writers for The Onion will have to be put on suicide watch if they catch a glimpse of this.
1 GeneralExtension 2018-10-03
This has been done before, if not on this scale.
1 BigDaddy_Delta 2018-10-03
More money must be funneled to this research
1 fsdgfhk 2018-10-03
1 songthatendstheworld 2018-10-03
oh god that's hysterical
1 RollBread 2018-10-03
It won an award if I remember correctly.
1 pitterpatterwater 2018-10-03
Have they forgotten Sokal?
1 -Mopsus- 2018-10-03
I have two degrees in the humanities, and I somehow managed to avoid the stereotypical humanities professor. I feel like most, if not all, of the profs I had were pretty great and would be able to sniff out bullshit like this.
The only professor I had who was overtly political during lectures was actually a biology professor, and everybody would get extremely annoyed by his tangents, because it wasted class time. At the same time though he was very anti-islam, because he was a gay former Muslim, and refused to go by his first of Mohammed.
1 RollBread 2018-10-03
Couldn't he just change his name?
1 -Mopsus- 2018-10-03
I suppose he could, but he just went by his middle name.
1 LordAndSaviorHaskell 2018-10-03
If he's a citizen of another country, he'd have to change his name in that country as far as I know and some countries don't allow you to change your name at will.
For example in Belgium you need to have a 'good reason' to change your name or it may get rejected.
1 ThatDamnedImp 2018-10-03
This is why people just flat-out don't trust academia.
The bullshit of the soft 'sciences' is destroying faith in the hard ones. Experts clearly aren't expert in anything but sniffing their own asses, and the people in charge of the whole thing are so overly biased that they accept obvious nonsense so long as they find it flattering.
1 bigberthaboy 2018-10-03
What's to take seriously? Giant journals make money selling people's research, that's a non starter imo
1 nithingpole 2018-10-03
There is literally zero financial incentive for any of this to change.
1 EvanHarper 2018-10-03
this isn't even really "the soft sciences," it's a more specific subset
1 MagicHoudini 2018-10-03
Found the STEMcuck
1 Multra 2018-10-03
Ummm excuse me shitlord it's STEAM now.
1 MagicHoudini 2018-10-03
What’s the A? are you sucking GabeN’s dick and I wasn’t invited?
1 Velxon 2018-10-03
The A in STEAM stands for art no joke
1 MagicHoudini 2018-10-03
I hoped it was autism
Also 🤢🤢🤢
1 cmakk1012 2018-10-03
Disgusting, what an insult to artists
1 NormanImmanuel 2018-10-03
Prof. Sidles pls go
1 error404brain 2018-10-03
Their total misunderstanding of how science work ?
1 wiking85 2018-10-03
More their ignoring of it and becoming a cult of buzz words that they don't even understand.
1 error404brain 2018-10-03
Not sure if you are talking about academia or the tard complaining about it.
1 wiking85 2018-10-03
Why not both
1 error404brain 2018-10-03
Nice 😎
1 habsdan37 2018-10-03
The answer to bad academia is better academia. You don’t abandon the whole project because of a few morons.
1 wiking85 2018-10-03
I though the solution was wholesale abandoning higher education whilst popping the student loan bubble?
1 TheRootinTootinPutin 2018-10-03
This, but unironically
1 wiking85 2018-10-03
Who says I was being ironic?
1 TareTiri 2018-10-03
You can't do better academia with this things. The whole thing is gilled of bias, fuck it might even require bias. This is not just a thing on the left, back in the 50s social scientist swore up and down how horror comics wete gonna lead to the downfall of society yet here we are.
1 habsdan37 2018-10-03
I suggest you research how the scientific method works. The only corrective for bad science is better science.
1 MooseHeckler 2018-10-03
Or bussy science?
1 gkm64 2018-10-03
​
Those social scientists did succeed in killing comics, you have to give it to them
​
Had it not been for that campaign, comics would most likely not be the superhero monoculture that they are today in the US (and that is increasing infecting Europe too, which largely kept out of this idiocy until the end of the 20th century). Movies would be in better shape too, and people wouldn't be such zombies...
1 nithingpole 2018-10-03
Comics died because entertainment moved on and there's more fun for less dollars with other stuff
1 Medibee 2018-10-03
So why is manga going strong
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2018-10-03
Yeah, manga generally has a far more diversified portfolio of genres.
1 nithingpole 2018-10-03
It's not. Sales have been going down for years
1 transoceanicdeath 2018-10-03
maybe they did
1 youcanteatbullets 2018-10-03
Measurements of flaccid penises are perfectly valid 'soft science'. This stuff is just garbage opinion which they call science for some reason.
1 transoceanicdeath 2018-10-03
no, because they use the technique where they press the ruler all the way against the pubic bone, which is clearly cheating. exposed length or GTFO
1 bittah_prophet 2018-10-03
Shut up, it’s the only way I can get to six inches.
1 RollBread 2018-10-03
This problem os seeping into hard scoence too.
There are hundreds of universities publishing tens of thousands of papers. Most of them are not going to be very good, and it has developed into an issue of incompetent individuals being awards degrees they would not have earned if held to a proper academic standard.
1 wiking85 2018-10-03
FTFY
1 gkm64 2018-10-03
The hard science are suffering from it too.
Keep in mind that you are not allowed anymore to state the basic biological fact that there are two sexes in Homo sapiens...
And in most STEM departments you have diversity quotas when it comes to hiring and promotions, which are having major negative impact on the morale of the people working there.
1 i_wish_i_was_dead___ 2018-10-03
lmao, sure thing buddy retard
1 LolFinland 2018-10-03
A physicist was just fired for telling the truth about women in sciences
1 Blinwar 2018-10-03
Making a case that women are currently being unfairly advantaged in academic hiring practices and being banned for that viewpoint != "You can't even say there are two genders!!!1!!"
1 transoceanicdeath 2018-10-03
i literally can't see the difference
1 shallowm 2018-10-03
a
1 diggity_md 2018-10-03
TWO SCOOPS TWO GENDERS when you own a libtard epic style 😂😎😂
1 shallowm 2018-10-03
imagine actually caring about a small subset of academia that only retards care about
coincidence??
1 terminator755 2018-10-03
Yet Mr. Lindsay says the project is worth it: “For us, the risk of letting biased research continue to influence education, media, policy and culture is far greater than anything that will happen to us for having done this.”
F
1 youcanteatbullets 2018-10-03
Yeah that's garbage though. They're playing the outrage game. If they want professorships in feminism and anti-racism (a real thing) then I bet they won't get it. If they want professorships in a real academic field they probably will.
1 Mikeavelli 2018-10-03
The guys who [did the equivalent of this in a real field] did pretty well for themselves afterwards.
1 LordAndSaviorHaskell 2018-10-03
That's because they published to trash journals. They'll essentially publish anything as long as you pay. Everybody I know would be glad to see these burn.
This is more comparable to the Sokal affair, but Sokal didn't actually publish in a field that's close to his own. I mean, when their original hoax got rejected, they instead set out to write papers that looked like the real thing. That's pretty deceptive.
1 Patyrn 2018-10-03
Of course it's deceptive, but it's not like they reporting fake science with fake numbers and experiments though. This shit is all masturbatory hogwash to begin with.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-10-03
Lol they're pre-cultivating outrage incase one of these losers doesn't get an amazing position in an academic environment that is already heavily competitive.
1 Aivias 2018-10-03
Have you hear of our Lord and Saviour Professor Jordan B. Peterson?
1 serial_crusher 2018-10-03
It’s funny, but it’s not just an “underwater basket weaving” thing. There were a group of computer science professors a few years back who made an algorithm that generated absolute bullshit CS papers and got those published too.
1 LordAndSaviorHaskell 2018-10-03
It kinda is though. The journals affected in this case are at least somewhat respected. The CS journals were basically spam journals.
1 Chauncy_Prime 2018-10-03
Feminism started as a family values movement by bible bangers like Susan B Anthony.
Men are:
More likely to be the victim of a violent crime.
More likely to be murdered. People 15 and older %70> of murders are men.
More likely to attempt suicide.
More likely to commit suicide successfully.
More likely to die in the work place. %93 of deaths in the work place are men.
More likely to fail in school and not graduate.
More likely to not go to college
Women out achieve men academically.
1 cochnbahls 2018-10-03
Quit whining, you pussy.
1 ABigBigThug 2018-10-03
I know we're flooded with MRA types right now, but could you at least bother to include a joke in your serious post?
1 number_11310 2018-10-03
the joke is the link to his profile above the comment
1 Chauncy_Prime 2018-10-03
The joke is on women. Despite all of the mitigating circumstances men still run this shit.
1 shallowm 2018-10-03
lol men dum
1 Verdreht 2018-10-03
This is so perfect I unironically cannot even
1 gkm64 2018-10-03
Note that these are not "marginal journals" as some will claim
Hypatia is indeed the leading feminist philosophy journal, and they got two papers there...
Most of the other journals are top in their "fields" too -- I have done some research on these topics in the past, and you get a pretty good idea about journal rankings from following the citations trees.
Which is not to say that there aren't many marginal feminist journals -- there are hundreds of them. But that hardly a reason to feel good about the state of things...
1 UmmahSultan 2018-10-03
Sounds pretty marginal TBH.
1 gkm64 2018-10-03
Well yes, it's a marginal field.
Intellectually.
In terms of real-life policy, it is having massive impacts.
1 80BAIT08 2018-10-03
Any subs having a meltdown over this?
1 AgentGotse 2018-10-03
Some people in Ghazi don't understand why those papers should have been rejected in the first place
https://old.reddit.com/r/GamerGhazi/comments/9kxhzw/fake_news_comes_to_academia/e72srnb/
1 ffbtaw 2018-10-03
Reminder that:
60% of econ studies replicate compared to
50% of pysch studies
and...
36% of sociology studies.