I am not sure which is more cringey, the litany of erroneous assumptions you splayed out or the act of calling upon the student archetype with the intent of derision. Anti-intellectualism, check. src
The touch doesn't need to be unwanted. In fact you can want it so bad you go put special make-up on for him, ans realize he has a gf but do it anyways because.. and I quote "whatever, I'm still gonna fuck you, dick too bomb".
I keep hearing people talking about how he has lied under oath. NPR was literally listing the shit he wrote in his yearbook and referring to fucking urban dictionary a couple days ago.
Blatant stuff. I have no connection to Yale, the witnesses who were there say that it didn’t happen, the drinking age was 18, etc. It's got to be a strategy, I just don't know what it is.
It would be considered sexual assault, or attempted rape. Hell people have definitely been convicted of sexual assault for much lighter touches than jumping on a girl and holding her down while you grope her and forcibly remove her clothing.
My favourite is how they try to make out that some slut who fucked so many guys they referred to each other as her 'alumnus' is deserving of some kind of respect.
Hot take: women will never be congratulated for fucking loads of dudes because, as much as people may try to convince you otherwise, women hate sluts more than men do.
Lol, a major Canadian movie personality slapped a girl while they were making out. He was acquitted, but no joke most of the country still believes he's a rapist, even though he wasn't ever even accused of that.
(Because sexual assault is a wide net, but when anyone says it, they just assume rape).
This his legit the best radical centrist take because it pisses everyone off. The #MeToo's are mad for not believing her and the conservautists are mad because Kavvy gets the boot.
Have you seen the latest polls in some senate races? Democrats fucked themselves hard. I hope they have fun with a third conservative justice after RBJ dies
Wow you picked two senators were who already already viewed as the most vunerable and were already trailing behind before the entire thing with Kavanaugh to prove your point.
You are a fucking moron as usual, the leftoids literally won't give a shit who believes what as long as they achieve their actual goal, none of them ever actually gave a fuck about Ford's story, Ford included.
Lol never stop being a retard. Women have been reeeing about the necessity of believing women throughout the whole Ford thing. To them, not believing a "survivor" makes you literal scum.
Women have been reeeing about the necessity of believing women throughout the whole Ford thing. To them, not believing a "survivor" makes you literal scum.
Lol at you thinking this in any way contradicts or disproves anything I've said.
TBH we just need to do away with highly empathetic mayo gussy. Used to be liberal men were the 'pay me a fair wage and Ill stop protesting and kicking the fucking shit out of the scabs youve hired to replace me' and women voted more conservative because 'we cant have the men going out to coffee bars and golf clubs because then who can we nag and drain of resources?'
The the NuLiberal women grew out their armpit hair and soyed the blokes up and now its all 'Im a non-gender conforming, female presenting intersectional feminist with BPD and a distinct desire for polyamourous relationships with men who I can nag and extract resources from'
Try not to be a complete idiot, leftists know that no matter what, a conservative is being confirmed. This particular one is just a detestable, squealing authoritarian swine. Kindly tell the other nascar-americans to just let it happen quickly so we can get over it
You remember gorsuch? 1/10th of the outrage about him cause there wasn't anything to get mad about beyond his court record, which 90% of burgers don't have the capacity to understand
This but unironically. I'd be Catholic if the Conciliar Movement of the 15th century was still going. Tell that Italian pope to haul his spaghetti ass up into the Alps and give some fucking answers to his flock.
Ever since Kennedy, the Vatican has been in direct control of the presidency. It's only a matter of time before us Catholics supercede the Jews. We'll be the ones calling the shots.
And I would say it becomes even weaker when you cant even say when or where the incident happened, oh and it happened 36 years ago. Just because it is considered "evidence" doesnt mean that it is necessarily good evidence.
This has been gone over multiple times, and apparently people are too busy drooling into their cheerios to get it.
Testimony is only evidence if it can be substantiated. Ie If someone accuses someone of something, the police are sent out to investigate, a police investigation is the means by which we establish that what the accuser says is at last possible. If you reach that point, a further investigation takes place which can include the arrest of the accused, attempts to collect physical evidence, and finding witnesses who can corroborate the accuseds testimony.
Tldr individual testimony with no corroborating evidence is not evidence of anything besides someone belief.
It's a job appointment, not the court of law. I absolutely agree that the current evidence against him would in no way justify taking away his liberty. But people are allowed to take it into account in choosing whether or not to appoint him.
Testimony is evidence btw. Otherwise people would not bother to bring in Mark Judge's negative account.
Yes of course it is evidence. But when literally your only evidence is one persons testimony on something that occurred at an unknown date 36 years ago, you are going to need a hell of a lot more to prove it happened.
Do you think it would be right for your boss to fire you on a whim? Do you think it would be right for someone to show up and accuse you of something at your job interview, that can not be proven, with nothing but their word?
I don't care how credible she sounds, without ANY other evidence to back up what she is saying, it is totally wrong to deny him the appointment based on the allegations.
Do you think its right if you go to hire someone and 4 people come out of the woodwork to say yeah he's a scummy pervert to be like "NOPE NO EVIDENCE HE'S HIRED", especially after he begins screaming at you when you ask if it's true about beer and calendars?
As much as you moronic noeliberals want it to happen, most people are not interested in turning every facet of human existence into a corporate blame and tell-tale culture
Except not all 4 of them are accusing him of the same thing? Also my point wasn't that it happened, it's that Kavanaugh has shown throughout this whole thing that he really should not be on the Supreme Court. Evading questions, lying under oath, becoming belligerent, blaming the Clintons. He's nit stable, definitely unfit for the HIGHEST COURT IN THE US.
What? I'm not the same guy you were responding to, I'm just pointing out why he was going on about polygraph tests. Ford took a polygraph and released the results, but polygraph tests are unreliable and basically inadmissible. People hear that she passed a lie detector test and that sounds like solid evidence to laymen.
Yeah, but the guy said she knew and taught others how to fake passing it, implying that it would have registered false if she didn't know how to do that
I'm just refuting the bullshit narrative that the mainstream media was shilling. They all touted her passing lie detector tests, with zero-critical thinking, as is their habit.
If someone warns you about a baby sitter, that they get handsy with the kids, and then three other parents tell you similar complaints, maybe pick another of the 10 babysitters you know of. You don't need to see photographic evidence of molestation not to be an idiot.
The situation clearly changes when you replace the job of "babysitter" with the job of "guy who takes part in deciding a ton of important shit", especially when the people in charge of filling that position could change in the next month if you can but delay the hiring process in the meantime.
Seems to me, the more important the decisions being made, the more careful one should be about not being an idiot and hiring a likely offender. Plus, it's their fault for picking a dud; McConnell and others advised against this nominee in the first place. I don't want to be saddled with a poor choice because they can't deal with their mistakes.
As all of the lefty shills have been pointing out, this isn't a trial. They're not wrong. If you proclaim your innocence but blatantly lie about stupid shit, it's not a good look.
As all of the lefty shills have been pointing out, this isn't a trial.
They certainly seem to be very proud to be pointing that out, and I'm not quite sure why - I never claimed this was a trial.
The "I believe" bullshit is just as relevant here.
I don't just believe someone by default - taking a position in an accusation this extreme without concrete evidence, just based on: "I kind of feel that this happened" is the ultimate sign of the idiot.
They certainly seem to be very proud to be pointing that out,
Huh, you're asking them about their emotional state?
I don't just believe someone by default
Seems like you are. Just a different someone.
"I kind of feel that this happened" is the ultimate sign of the idiot.
Right, and you may have run across those people on Reddit. That's what this sub is all about. But then there are people who watched the testimonies and have a pretty good non-feels idea about who is more likely telling the truth about the incident and who made disqualifying lies under oath.
hang on whos a strongman what are you talking about
but yeah anyone who rages at trump is insecure af, thats why theyre adopting a herd mentality and trying to get on what they perceive to be the winning team to avoid being socially ostracized
its not like any anti trump people actually understand why they think they hate him, its just a blind rage because of the tv
If you don't actually understand why people think Trump is retarded, then you're probably retarded. Socially retarded at the very least. Not because you don't follow the crowd but instead, because you think crass behavior and pathological dishonesty are fitting characteristics for anyone holding the office of president( you know: the nation's leader, negotiator, commander in chief of the armed forces)
Also.
Who's a strongman
You're also politically retarded with a memory of a goldfish.
Trump has praised strongmen like Mao and Putin for the grasp they have on their respective countries. Trump is a demagogue and wannabe strongman. 2+2=4
What if I don't believe Ford but I don't want Kavanaugh confirmed because I don't want a Conservative supreme court majority to set this country back for the next 50 years.
MLK and RFK assasinations, thousands of young men dying for nothing in rice patties, US citizens getting pummeled on the streets of Chicago, leading to Nixon. Great times.
Constant posts to CA & Mens Rights. Instantly assumes anyone who isn't super conservative is a liberal and finds a way to condescendingly call them a loser because of your identity politics bullshit.
Probably someone practicing debating online, arguing for points the don't hold to see which argument gets the most upvotes/downvotes. It's a new thing among university students atm.
Yeah, that's what it is. It couldn't possibly be the fact that a CTH retard has no scruples and thinks the rules only apply to the people outside his tribe.
They go to the mattresses for liberal mayo comedians because that's what they imagine themselves to be. Can you imagine what sort of horrific crimes they'd forgive of Robin Williams?
I take wholly contradictory viewpoints all the time, I can veer from neoliberal center right to full on tankie depending on my mood and current amphetamine blood levels.
If we believe Ford, Kavanaugh lied under oath during his job interview. Let's just confirm Judge Judy and retire on the skyrocketing value of DramaCoin.
Liberals: Pizzagate is an insane dangerous conspiracy from the alt-right! "The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yours?)" is totally normal language used in totally normal conversation!
Also liberals: Devil's Triangle referred to three-way sex even back in the 80s! What's that? Another student has "lost Devil's Triangle" on written under them in the year book? That's coded language meaning they touched dicks!
Well if you believe Kavanaugh assaulted her idk if you'd want him confirmed lol. Only way this works is if you believe this is a case of mistaken identity
207 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-10-03
I am not sure which is more cringey, the litany of erroneous assumptions you splayed out or the act of calling upon the student archetype with the intent of derision. Anti-intellectualism, check. src
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 shaneoffline 2018-10-03
P ez
She was raped, simply by someone else, but she deeply believes it was Kdog.
1 wwyzzerdd 2018-10-03
Have we moved from groping to rape? Or is everything just rape now?
1 transoceanicdeath 2018-10-03
now? everything was rape in like 2016.
1 Mikeavelli 2018-10-03
This comment is rape.
1 jubbergun 2018-10-03
Only because they said 2016 and not Current Year 01.
1 banananutbranmuffin 2018-10-03
Any unwanted touch can be construed as rape now, that's where the goal post are and also, these goal post can be moved at someone's discretion
1 carnivoreinyeg 2018-10-03
The touch doesn't need to be unwanted. In fact you can want it so bad you go put special make-up on for him, ans realize he has a gf but do it anyways because.. and I quote "whatever, I'm still gonna fuck you, dick too bomb".
Then turn around and call it a rape.
1 umar4812 2018-10-03
Nice meta
1 bigberthaboy 2018-10-03
Man what did anyone expect to gain with that article, it's like controlled opposition tier
1 unrulyfarmhand 2018-10-03
Most people don't even know that it wasn't rape. Honestly impressive optics by liberal media.
1 wwyzzerdd 2018-10-03
I'll give them credit for actually learning from others.
If you repeat a lie enough it becomes the truth.
1 nybbas 2018-10-03
I keep hearing people talking about how he has lied under oath. NPR was literally listing the shit he wrote in his yearbook and referring to fucking urban dictionary a couple days ago.
1 jubbergun 2018-10-03
Proving once again that we are truly living in the dankest of all possible timelines.
1 schabadoo 2018-10-03
Because he lied about basic shit, just stupid easily verifiable petty facts. Still can't figure out his angle.
1 nybbas 2018-10-03
What did he lie about?
1 schabadoo 2018-10-03
Blatant stuff. I have no connection to Yale, the witnesses who were there say that it didn’t happen, the drinking age was 18, etc. It's got to be a strategy, I just don't know what it is.
1 seenten 2018-10-03
Be as retarded as your constituents and they'll love you
1 RecallRethuglicans 2018-10-03
That he didn't organize gang rape parties
1 grungebot5000 2018-10-03
have you seriously never heard of a devil’s triangle?
that shit is from, like, the 1890s
1 watermark02 2018-10-03
It would be considered sexual assault, or attempted rape. Hell people have definitely been convicted of sexual assault for much lighter touches than jumping on a girl and holding her down while you grope her and forcibly remove her clothing.
1 Aivias 2018-10-03
My favourite is how they try to make out that some slut who fucked so many guys they referred to each other as her 'alumnus' is deserving of some kind of respect.
Hot take: women will never be congratulated for fucking loads of dudes because, as much as people may try to convince you otherwise, women hate sluts more than men do.
1 carnivoreinyeg 2018-10-03
Lol, a major Canadian movie personality slapped a girl while they were making out. He was acquitted, but no joke most of the country still believes he's a rapist, even though he wasn't ever even accused of that.
(Because sexual assault is a wide net, but when anyone says it, they just assume rape).
1 wwyzzerdd 2018-10-03
Lucy bangs the dumbest guys.
1 egotisticalnoob 2018-10-03
Everything is rape.
1 wwyzzerdd 2018-10-03
<User was raped by this post>
1 Kilo_G_looked_up 2018-10-03
This but unironically.
1 icefourthirtythree 2018-10-03
No, we believe Kavanaugh and we confirm Ford.
1 ironicshitpostr 2018-10-03
The true centrist would confirm them both.
1 demotecontrol 2018-10-03
A true centrist would rape Kavanaugh and confirm Ford.
1 high_side 2018-10-03
Bussy, lmao
1 WorldStarCroCop 2018-10-03
this but unironically
1 erlaps 2018-10-03
Y tho, he didnt rape anyone tho
1 demotecontrol 2018-10-03
The reality is that everybody needs a little bit of a rape every now and then.
1 erlaps 2018-10-03
Its not rape if i want it OwO
1 officerkondo 2018-10-03
Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
1 cmakk1012 2018-10-03
ew
1 allwordsaredust 2018-10-03
What month is it okay to like capeshit?
1 cmakk1012 2018-10-03
NO MONTH
🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢
🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
1 jmz_199 2018-10-03
I'd take "cape shit" over using emojis like this any day
1 papanojohns 2018-10-03
nice comedy chevrons, friend :)
1 cmakk1012 2018-10-03
newforces can’t trifriend :)
1 wwaalleess 2018-10-03
Good meme 😂
1 Momruepari 2018-10-03
THANOS CAR
THANOS CAR
THANOS CAR
THANOS CAR
THANOS CAR
THANOS CAR
THANOS CAR
1 officerkondo 2018-10-03
I have seen 14,000,605 levels of irony.
1 Pizzashillsghost 2018-10-03
No, we let Ford and Kavanaugh mud wrestle in an area and then we confirm Hulk Hogan.
1 high_side 2018-10-03
No, we drag the hearings out for another year or so. Unless you don't like rape drama and nationally televised spergouts.
1 Plexipus 2018-10-03
My Ford gets 30 mpg, what does your Kavanaugh get
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-10-03
It it really the radical centrist take when half the Republicans are saying exactly that? 🤔
1 high_side 2018-10-03
Alcoholics need their minority hire tho.
1 seenten 2018-10-03
True, there's been a hole there since Scalia
1 wow___justwow 2018-10-03
Republicans are paying her lip service because calling women who cry about rape attempts lying whores isn't in right now.
1 cruelandusual 2018-10-03
No, we can not care about Ford and not confirm Kavanaugh because he's a shrill, red faced, crying little bitch, and also a papist.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-10-03
This his legit the best radical centrist take because it pisses everyone off. The #MeToo's are mad for not believing her and the conservautists are mad because Kavvy gets the boot.
1 high_side 2018-10-03
But the radical centrists will be happy...
1 BusyMushroom 2018-10-03
It doesn't really piss everyone off because a lot of conservatives would prefer someone else
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-10-03
They'll still be buttmad that the Dems "won"
1 BusyMushroom 2018-10-03
Have you seen the latest polls in some senate races? Democrats fucked themselves hard. I hope they have fun with a third conservative justice after RBJ dies
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-10-03
What do you think the scare quotes are for?
1 jakl13 2018-10-03
in what specific senate races? most republicans are getting bootyblasted rn
1 AgainstSpez 2018-10-03
Dem senator Heidi Heitkamp's polls have tanked since the Kavanaugh bru-haugh-haugh unfolded; and Joe Donnelly's comfortable lead has collapsed
1 CherryKirsche 2018-10-03
Wow you picked two senators were who already already viewed as the most vunerable and were already trailing behind before the entire thing with Kavanaugh to prove your point.
1 AgainstSpez 2018-10-03
There are only so many senate elections in this political cycle, and they are all in states that are Leans Republican.
Besides, you asked a question, I answered
1 nmx179 2018-10-03
You are a fucking moron as usual, the leftoids literally won't give a shit who believes what as long as they achieve their actual goal, none of them ever actually gave a fuck about Ford's story, Ford included.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-10-03
Lol never stop being a retard. Women have been reeeing about the necessity of believing women throughout the whole Ford thing. To them, not believing a "survivor" makes you literal scum.
1 nmx179 2018-10-03
Lol at you thinking this in any way contradicts or disproves anything I've said.
1 Aivias 2018-10-03
TBH we just need to do away with highly empathetic mayo gussy. Used to be liberal men were the 'pay me a fair wage and Ill stop protesting and kicking the fucking shit out of the scabs youve hired to replace me' and women voted more conservative because 'we cant have the men going out to coffee bars and golf clubs because then who can we nag and drain of resources?'
The the NuLiberal women grew out their armpit hair and soyed the blokes up and now its all 'Im a non-gender conforming, female presenting intersectional feminist with BPD and a distinct desire for polyamourous relationships with men who I can nag and extract resources from'
1 DAM1313 2018-10-03
Try not to be a complete idiot, leftists know that no matter what, a conservative is being confirmed. This particular one is just a detestable, squealing authoritarian swine. Kindly tell the other nascar-americans to just let it happen quickly so we can get over it
1 nmx179 2018-10-03
LMAO pretending there's a conservative who leftoids aren't going to scream is a "detestable blah de blah hate hate bitch whine moan"
1 Feminism2012 2018-10-03
Like gorsich.
1 nmx179 2018-10-03
Gorsuch wasn't the swing vote to overturn Roe, you moron.
1 DAM1313 2018-10-03
You remember gorsuch? 1/10th of the outrage about him cause there wasn't anything to get mad about beyond his court record, which 90% of burgers don't have the capacity to understand
1 nmx179 2018-10-03
There isn't anything to get mad at Kavanaugh for other than
his court record
the delusions of a crazy bitch
If Gorsuch has been post-#metoo some crazy bitch would have come out of the woodwork for him, too.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-10-03
Lol you think Ford doesn't care?
1 Redactor0 2018-10-03
This. Every vote to confirm Kavanaugh is a vote for superstition, Jesuitical terror, and Roman supremacy.
1 SigmaWhy 2018-10-03
The Council of Nicaea was a TOTAL SHAM
1 demotecontrol 2018-10-03
Council of Trent intensifies
1 cmakk1012 2018-10-03
lmfao
1 Megazor 2018-10-03
The 4th crusade was an inside job to destabilize Byzantium
1 The_DHC 2018-10-03
Vatican III when
1 Redactor0 2018-10-03
This but unironically. I'd be Catholic if the Conciliar Movement of the 15th century was still going. Tell that Italian pope to haul his spaghetti ass up into the Alps and give some fucking answers to his flock.
1 Phantom_Engineer 2018-10-03
Arius was right.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-10-03
You just know he's gonna do everything he can to protect the pedo priests too
1 high_side 2018-10-03
Is he not evangelical?
1 jubbergun 2018-10-03
Stop trying to make it sound metal.
1 cuteman 2018-10-03
Believe it or not it's largely a Portuguese conspiracy
1 grungebot5000 2018-10-03
well it certainly explains a lot
1 cuteman 2018-10-03
Truly sit Ulrich
1 ApugalypseNow 2018-10-03
I don't want no eye-talian pope tellin mah Supreme Court how to vote.
1 BigDaddy_Delta 2018-10-03
But she has a vocal fry, so screw her
1 umar4812 2018-10-03
Honestly that is the worst. She goes from a normal voice to a fucking 12 year old's voice.
1 d4ddyd54m4 2018-10-03
Pretty common in the white female specimens
1 wewladin 2018-10-03
NO MORE CATHOLICS IN OUR COURTS!!!!
1 Gigletes 2018-10-03
Kavanaugh is a papist? Where's an angry Swede when you need one...
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-10-03
All the best justices are Catholic.
1 grungebot5000 2018-10-03
what about Judge Dredd
1 Momruepari 2018-10-03
Ever since Kennedy, the Vatican has been in direct control of the presidency. It's only a matter of time before us Catholics supercede the Jews. We'll be the ones calling the shots.
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2018-10-03
The Papists were in control since they let the (((Hibernians))) in.
1 SoldierofNod 2018-10-03
Did you know he likes beer?
1 Sips_enthusiast 2018-10-03
>not respecting gods chosen representative on earth and leader of the one true faith
Seamus, we've got another protestant. Get the fertilizer
1 hyledog 2018-10-03
Ford raped Kavanaugh’s hand with her pussy
1 error404brain 2018-10-03
I don't believe Ford but I believe Kavanaugh raped people because he was a frat boy.
Also Kavanaugh is getting confirmed regardless of wether he was guilty or not.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-10-03
I miss Brutus
1 dopamineway 2018-10-03
😂😂😂 you guys
1 gaynazifurry4bernie 2018-10-03
Why don't we just force Ford to grope Kav-daddy?
1 YoMothaFlippin 2018-10-03
What's the deal with "Believing"?
I don't give a fuck about what people believe or shouldn't believe - it's about evidence.
And there is no fucking evidence for this extraordinary claim.
1 pullancur 2018-10-03
Exactly. I'm the most skeptical about political stuff
1 jallopsmith 2018-10-03
Yeah but he's a republican
1 high_side 2018-10-03
😭
1 nybbas 2018-10-03
I keep hearing "I saw her testimony and I absolutely believe her".
Ok cool, so? Good thing "they really seemed to be telling the truth" isn't all it takes to prove someone did something.
1 Silented 2018-10-03
Testimony is evidence sweaty.
1 nybbas 2018-10-03
go on.
1 Singulaire 2018-10-03
Witness testimony is literally a form of "evidence" in legal jargon. It's considerably less strong than "material evidence" such as a video recording.
1 nybbas 2018-10-03
And I would say it becomes even weaker when you cant even say when or where the incident happened, oh and it happened 36 years ago. Just because it is considered "evidence" doesnt mean that it is necessarily good evidence.
1 Pro_Extent 2018-10-03
Yeah, so are fingrprints on a murder weapon but that alone isn't enough to convict.
A successful criminal conviction requires multiple points of evidence to paint a picture that can be believed beyond reasonable doubt.
1 Lvl100SkrubRekker 2018-10-03
This has been gone over multiple times, and apparently people are too busy drooling into their cheerios to get it.
Testimony is only evidence if it can be substantiated. Ie If someone accuses someone of something, the police are sent out to investigate, a police investigation is the means by which we establish that what the accuser says is at last possible. If you reach that point, a further investigation takes place which can include the arrest of the accused, attempts to collect physical evidence, and finding witnesses who can corroborate the accuseds testimony.
Tldr individual testimony with no corroborating evidence is not evidence of anything besides someone belief.
1 watermark02 2018-10-03
It's a job appointment, not the court of law. I absolutely agree that the current evidence against him would in no way justify taking away his liberty. But people are allowed to take it into account in choosing whether or not to appoint him.
Testimony is evidence btw. Otherwise people would not bother to bring in Mark Judge's negative account.
1 nybbas 2018-10-03
Yes of course it is evidence. But when literally your only evidence is one persons testimony on something that occurred at an unknown date 36 years ago, you are going to need a hell of a lot more to prove it happened.
Do you think it would be right for your boss to fire you on a whim? Do you think it would be right for someone to show up and accuse you of something at your job interview, that can not be proven, with nothing but their word?
I don't care how credible she sounds, without ANY other evidence to back up what she is saying, it is totally wrong to deny him the appointment based on the allegations.
1 jakl13 2018-10-03
Do you think its right if you go to hire someone and 4 people come out of the woodwork to say yeah he's a scummy pervert to be like "NOPE NO EVIDENCE HE'S HIRED", especially after he begins screaming at you when you ask if it's true about beer and calendars?
1 Aivias 2018-10-03
As much as you moronic noeliberals want it to happen, most people are not interested in turning every facet of human existence into a corporate blame and tell-tale culture
1 jakl13 2018-10-03
how many buzzwords can i fit into a comment. PC Outrage Tell-tale neolib neocon cuck snowflake culture bussy lmao
1 Aivias 2018-10-03
One. Neoliberal. Which perfectly encapsulates the political opinions of 99.99% of modern liberals.
1 YoMothaFlippin 2018-10-03
1 person accusing someone of something that occurred at an unknown date 36 years ago with little to no concrete evidence = worth zero.
Now multiply the number of people by 4.
4 people accusing someone of something that occurred at an unknown date 36 years ago with little to no concrete evidence = 4x0.
1 jakl13 2018-10-03
Except not all 4 of them are accusing him of the same thing? Also my point wasn't that it happened, it's that Kavanaugh has shown throughout this whole thing that he really should not be on the Supreme Court. Evading questions, lying under oath, becoming belligerent, blaming the Clintons. He's nit stable, definitely unfit for the HIGHEST COURT IN THE US.
1 NefariousTyke 2018-10-03
I like you.
1 489031573147892 2018-10-03
I guess you didn't hear about her exboyfriend. She slutted it up in Hawaii, charged his credit card, and lied about her fear of flying.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-10-03
Lie detector tests don’t work, retard. Aside from that, they’re basically inadmissible, so where did you get all these ideas?
1 ExtraSluttyOliveOil 2018-10-03
Polygraph tests aren't reliable, yeah. But her passing a polygraph test was like the first thing that came out after the accusation.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-10-03
Whaaaat? Using a known unreliable method to discredit a troublesome witness? Clearly there’s no way trump would let that happen!
1 ExtraSluttyOliveOil 2018-10-03
What? I'm not the same guy you were responding to, I'm just pointing out why he was going on about polygraph tests. Ford took a polygraph and released the results, but polygraph tests are unreliable and basically inadmissible. People hear that she passed a lie detector test and that sounds like solid evidence to laymen.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-10-03
Yeah, but the guy said she knew and taught others how to fake passing it, implying that it would have registered false if she didn't know how to do that
1 489031573147892 2018-10-03
You don't really understand polygraph tests. They are prone to false-positives, not false-negatives. Educate yourself dipshit.
1 489031573147892 2018-10-03
I'm just refuting the bullshit narrative that the mainstream media was shilling. They all touted her passing lie detector tests, with zero-critical thinking, as is their habit.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-10-03
So you don’t have one?
1 489031573147892 2018-10-03
wtf are you asking me
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-10-03
I'm saying you don't have a point or a source and you hate all those beta-orbiter-cucks MDEFUGEES GET OUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
1 Aivias 2018-10-03
It shrieked for the billionth time, continuing in its oath to remain retarded until the die its bones disappeared into dust...
1 ztoundas 2018-10-03
Good thing he's not being sentenced or charged, then huh?
1 slugulon 2018-10-03
yOu DoNt NeEd EvIdEnCe OuTsIdE oF a CoUrT
Ascending my almonds to a level never thought possible
1 ztoundas 2018-10-03
If someone warns you about a baby sitter, that they get handsy with the kids, and then three other parents tell you similar complaints, maybe pick another of the 10 babysitters you know of. You don't need to see photographic evidence of molestation not to be an idiot.
1 high_side 2018-10-03
I like it, that's too much text to retype in spongebobcase so he's out of rebuttals.
1 Warbring3r 2018-10-03
So you’re saying he’s going to rape Ginsburg?
1 grungebot5000 2018-10-03
Ginsburg is too kinky to be raped
1 ztoundas 2018-10-03
what else is there?
1 Han55512 2018-10-03
The situation clearly changes when you replace the job of "babysitter" with the job of "guy who takes part in deciding a ton of important shit", especially when the people in charge of filling that position could change in the next month if you can but delay the hiring process in the meantime.
1 ztoundas 2018-10-03
Seems to me, the more important the decisions being made, the more careful one should be about not being an idiot and hiring a likely offender. Plus, it's their fault for picking a dud; McConnell and others advised against this nominee in the first place. I don't want to be saddled with a poor choice because they can't deal with their mistakes.
1 watermark02 2018-10-03
Witness testimony is evidence
1 high_side 2018-10-03
As all of the lefty shills have been pointing out, this isn't a trial. They're not wrong. If you proclaim your innocence but blatantly lie about stupid shit, it's not a good look.
1 YoMothaFlippin 2018-10-03
They certainly seem to be very proud to be pointing that out, and I'm not quite sure why - I never claimed this was a trial.
The "I believe" bullshit is just as relevant here.
I don't just believe someone by default - taking a position in an accusation this extreme without concrete evidence, just based on: "I kind of feel that this happened" is the ultimate sign of the idiot.
1 high_side 2018-10-03
Huh, you're asking them about their emotional state?
Seems like you are. Just a different someone.
Right, and you may have run across those people on Reddit. That's what this sub is all about. But then there are people who watched the testimonies and have a pretty good non-feels idea about who is more likely telling the truth about the incident and who made disqualifying lies under oath.
1 YoMothaFlippin 2018-10-03
I have absolutely no fucking idea what you're talking about.
Like at all.
This entire comment, I don't understand it.
1 high_side 2018-10-03
Half of it is your own words, so...
1 cattypakes 2018-10-03
eyewitness testimony is literally evidence you faggot retard
1 cuteman 2018-10-03
Pseudo religious dogma.
Ever seen a purple hair fatty start speaking in tongues on campus? I have.
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-03
i just want to know why the woman looks like a deflated balloon personally
1 Tobans 2018-10-03
No, you always want to know why everyone is always making fun of daddy. Lbr.
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-03
its clearly because youre insecure and dont know much about politics lol why would anyone be confused about that
1 Tobans 2018-10-03
Oh, I'm insecure, yet you attach your identity to corrupt strongmen and demagogues. Rlly boils the ol' noodle 🤔🤔
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-03
hang on whos a strongman what are you talking about
but yeah anyone who rages at trump is insecure af, thats why theyre adopting a herd mentality and trying to get on what they perceive to be the winning team to avoid being socially ostracized
its not like any anti trump people actually understand why they think they hate him, its just a blind rage because of the tv
people are basically lemmings
1 Tobans 2018-10-03
If you don't actually understand why people think Trump is retarded, then you're probably retarded. Socially retarded at the very least. Not because you don't follow the crowd but instead, because you think crass behavior and pathological dishonesty are fitting characteristics for anyone holding the office of president( you know: the nation's leader, negotiator, commander in chief of the armed forces)
Also.
You're also politically retarded with a memory of a goldfish.
Trump has praised strongmen like Mao and Putin for the grasp they have on their respective countries. Trump is a demagogue and wannabe strongman. 2+2=4
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-03
lol i understand perfectly, its because a lot of your countrymen are extremely susceptible to really low level propaganda
trump is barely even offensive, its just that jews hate him and they run the media you absorb so easily
and so you just basically repeat what they want without an ounce of critical thought
hashtag resist amirite
lol dude OMG HE SAID HE GRABBED A PUSSY #BASTA
yeah i dont actually hang on random words he said because im not a huge faggot and i only care about relatively important things
1 newsreporter111 2018-10-03
for real, the bitch is 50 yet her skin sags like a 90 year olds. Imagine how saggy her tits must be
1 I_love_racist_jokes 2018-10-03
What if I don't believe Ford but I don't want Kavanaugh confirmed because I don't want a Conservative supreme court majority to set this country back for the next 50 years.
1 Cassius40k 2018-10-03
This is highly likely the majority of people who are against Kav right now.
1 I_love_racist_jokes 2018-10-03
You're probably actually right
1 wow___justwow 2018-10-03
Believe Kavanaugh confirm Ford
1 Tobans 2018-10-03
Disbelieve Ford disbar Kavanaugh
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-10-03
The country was better 50 years ago
1 schabadoo 2018-10-03
MLK and RFK assasinations, thousands of young men dying for nothing in rice patties, US citizens getting pummeled on the streets of Chicago, leading to Nixon. Great times.
1 preserved_fish 2018-10-03
No one even died in Chicago, as they did in Newark, Detroit, DC, Watts, etc.
1 Aivias 2018-10-03
Nixon wasnt that bad
1 Sips_enthusiast 2018-10-03
This but unironically
1 watermark02 2018-10-03
This country was better 500 years ago
Pure pristine wilderness with nary a mayo in sight
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-10-03
Ew but all the bugs
1 jubbergun 2018-10-03
Then at least you're honest, unlike the /r/politics crowd.
1 high_side 2018-10-03
Then you're bad at identifying a liar.
1 nmx179 2018-10-03
this guy Believes Women
1 high_side 2018-10-03
HUR DUR HE'S BIASED!
1 ThatDamnedImp 2018-10-03
Then start winning elections, dumbass.
1 I_love_racist_jokes 2018-10-03
Constant posts to CA & Mens Rights. Instantly assumes anyone who isn't super conservative is a liberal and finds a way to condescendingly call them a loser because of your identity politics bullshit.
OUT OUT OUT
1 lifesbrink 2018-10-03
How about since they both sound like dumb shits we throw them off a cliff and be done with it.
1 high_side 2018-10-03
1 papanojohns 2018-10-03
So is the mayocide still on or nah?
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-10-03
Kav is firmly anti-mayocide and will do his best to prevent it, making it extra important that he's kept off the court
1 watermark02 2018-10-03
The supreme court cannot stop the mayocide
Nothing can
Mayocide is literally a law of nature
1 jubbergun 2018-10-03
If you want to see true radical centrism, check out this CTH user disagreeing with himself:
https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/7i1s0q/senator_franken_to_resign_on_thursday/dqvjhth/
https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/9k5zx1/cmv_the_accusation_of_kavenaugh_should_not_affect/e6wnzac/
1 ThaThug 2018-10-03
Probably someone practicing debating online, arguing for points the don't hold to see which argument gets the most upvotes/downvotes. It's a new thing among university students atm.
1 jubbergun 2018-10-03
Yeah, that's what it is. It couldn't possibly be the fact that a CTH retard has no scruples and thinks the rules only apply to the people outside his tribe.
1 preserved_fish 2018-10-03
They go to the mattresses for liberal mayo comedians because that's what they imagine themselves to be. Can you imagine what sort of horrific crimes they'd forgive of Robin Williams?
1 watermark02 2018-10-03
I take wholly contradictory viewpoints all the time, I can veer from neoliberal center right to full on tankie depending on my mood and current amphetamine blood levels.
1 seenten 2018-10-03
...did you dig 10 months in to their post history?
1 jubbergun 2018-10-03
Search engines are a thing, you know.
1 newsreporter111 2018-10-03
Ford must've done a lot of drugs and drinking when she was young. Her skin is so wrinkly and saggy and she isn't even 60
1 high_side 2018-10-03
Third day on reddit and you've found the asshole! We should play devil's triangle.
1 newsreporter111 2018-10-03
I'm down for it bby
1 high_side 2018-10-03
If we believe Ford, Kavanaugh lied under oath during his job interview. Let's just confirm Judge Judy and retire on the skyrocketing value of DramaCoin.
1 skidmarklicker 2018-10-03
Liberals: Pizzagate is an insane dangerous conspiracy from the alt-right! "The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yours?)" is totally normal language used in totally normal conversation!
Also liberals: Devil's Triangle referred to three-way sex even back in the 80s! What's that? Another student has "lost Devil's Triangle" on written under them in the year book? That's coded language meaning they touched dicks!
1 watermark02 2018-10-03
You can do that. That is truly a course of events that a human being could plausibly take.
1 cuteman 2018-10-03
This isn't the victory they wanted but it's the defeat democrats can accept so that they stop losing on this particular issue.
The polls week on week and month on month are going to be interesting.
1 coldfirerules 2018-10-03
So were doing retarded memes now?
1 dumbwaeguk 2018-10-03
Or we can question both and wait until definitive evidence comes in. Oh shit, I hope that's not too radical.
1 WorldStarCroCop 2018-10-03
Or just don't believe either
1 TipsMeme 2018-10-03
D E V I L S T R I A N G L E
E
V
I
L
S
​
T
R
I
A
N
G
L
E
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
#FFFF
1 Hua_D 2018-10-03
Jewish democrat communists posting anti American Bolshevism on Reddit, who could have ever seen that gigantic nose coming.
https://www.reddit.com/r/dogswithjobs/comments/9l4x91/z/e74i4ub
Just a highlight from this anti-Semite's posts.
1 TipsMeme 2018-10-03
|>
&
​
Hand rubbing intensifies
​
1 Chin_Up_Chick 2018-10-03
Well if you believe Kavanaugh assaulted her idk if you'd want him confirmed lol. Only way this works is if you believe this is a case of mistaken identity
1 ThatDamnedImp 2018-10-03
ITT: Democrats REEEEing.