About like 30 to 45 minutes ago I beat the fuck outta my dick so goddamn hard that I can't even feel my left leg, my left leg has went totally numb and my dick has also went totally numb to the point where it feels fucking weird when I take a piss.
Conservatives when a baker refuses to make a cake for a gag couple: Private businesses have a right to refuse service to whoever they want.
Conservatives when a private website bans a conspiracy theorist, who, incidentally, censors content on his own website, for slander and libel: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Except only one of those cases had faggots pulling a stunt for lawsuit money. It doesn't really matter. Gay, straight, you're all wajib ul qatal for me. <3
If you’ve managed to step on the feet of 4 separate companies with the knowledge that they basically run or have a say in all of the top websites on the planet then you deserve to be banned off of it
theyre all friends and pretend activists that think they have a right to curate society, and they dont
theyre not good people just because their interests coincidentally align with yours right now, you shouldnt just throw all the safeguards against them out the window
Daily reminder that in the modern world most communication happens through social media. Denying people access to the big platforms that everyone uses is basically silencing them. It's hilarious you think giving silicone valley more power won't lead to disaster
Denying people access to the big platforms that everyone uses is basically silencing them
You can be kicked off someone’s property for screaming, you can be kicked off of government property for screaming, and you can be kicked off a public park for screaming. Do you know what you will also be charged with? public nuisance. If somebody owns it then you don’t get to do whatever you want with it and they aren’t forced to let you.
think giving silicone valley more power won’t lead to disaster
Not giving more power just defending the right they already have:
private businesses that arent a monopoly have the right to refuse service, whereas something like a utility company cant even if theyre privately owned
the dispute is whether a company like google or facebook counts as a monopoly considering it effectively works as one
They only function as a monopoly because people make them like that you ape. It’s not like food, health, or safety. They get to have a bias or censor people because it’s impossible to harm someone by banning them from twitter.
Removing you from a luxury that you don’t own isn’t harmful you spastic. Also, people remove other people from shit in real life all the time if they get sick of them, see public disturbance.
speaking in public isnt a luxury and speaking on the internet is the same as speaking in public
if you buy the land the town square resides on you dont suddenly get to control whats said there
google and facebook and twitter deliberately established themselves as a defacto default place to speak, with the expectation that theyd abide by social contracts and not faggot it up because of political leanings
then once they became popular enough they started fucking people
they really all need to be broken up and thats probably going to happen before trump gets out of office
Speaking on the internet is not the same as speaking in public in any way other than the speaking part.
You can still freely choose to say what you want in public or apply for an interview or talk with an organization.
Just because you’re not allowed a medium to broadcast your voice doesn’t mean your voice is being silenced it just means you’re only able to use your own voice with no external help.
Also lol at trump having any impact in how legislation gets done DDF assemble!
I like how you meme arrowed the first part and left out the bit about not being allowed a medium isn’t silencing you. Go outside and state your views go find a news outlet near you or go to rallies and try and get your voice heard. None of those places require social media.
Oh and cope harder about Daddy being a moron with no respect from his staff
“Hah duuude lol like why should I put in time and effort to increase my standing and give my words media attention and influence when I can screech MAGA and libtard tearz if a company is forced to host me?”
everyone important respects what he’s doing
I’ll bet
if you hate him u a lolcow that doesn’t know stuff basically
Did you have a stroke writing that? From the sentence structure to how unaware you have to be to say that on this subreddit?
Tbh, this is a pretty reasonable verdict. They didn't deny him service because he was gay, they denied to write a specific message on the cake they baked for him due to their beliefs (retarded as they are).
Same way a baker can refuse to make a cake with a writing "GAS THE FOIDS - WHITE SHARIA NOW on it.
Oh yeah, if this was some tranny baker telling a bunch of Christcucks to gtfo, MAGAcels would be seething and screeching about their frozen peaches & white genocide.
Libshits tried to make a false sexual assault accusation to interfere with the supreme court nomination so I’d get off that high horse if I were you, faggot.
Pretty sure you're a retard who doesn't know what he's talking about.
The case ruled today that the man was not discriminated on account of his views, whereas Jones clearly was. I do agree though that the fucking retards who couldn't choke on each others' dicks hard enough when Jones got banned are crying about this case.
This was in the United Kingdom. The case was about the words in the law of the United Kingdom. People in the UK don't have rights like we do in the US so all this moral stuff is totally irrelevant. It's not because gays are second class citizens like you think they should be in an ideal non-degenerate society, nor because everyone's rights are protected equally as in our crazy SJW vision. Literally there is no constitution in the UK so all of that is irrelevant.
One of the most terrifying and disappointing developments in today's society is that free speech went from something important and worth fighting for to something that is made fun of.
It's mostly made fun of when used by idiots who think it's a defense against criticism. Anyone who cries free speech without even bothering to know what it means deserves to be mocked ruthlessly.
I was gonna say it's also idiots that deny other people's free speech and freedom of association by crying "censorship" when someone kicks them to the curb, but you went ahead and made that point firsthand it seems.
Arguing that you should be able to freely say your beliefs is literally like arguing that people should be able to scribble pornography on television. You are psychotic and your beliefs are pornography and utterly irrational. One side of the political spectrum is standard human reason; the other side, something went wrong at some point and they've devolved below animals.
Yeah the freedom to deny service to minorities you find offensive in public places
That's like somewhere in the constitution right
If you want to deny services to minorities, try moving to a different country, like a fascist one where there's no freedom like you salivate about, and where people are just savages. That's the natural state of whites, that was the state you were in all through the middle ages until we of liberal civilization rescued you. Now you think you are the ones responsible for all of our advances? We need to leave you high and dry. You have gotten too cocky. White civilization is responsible for nothing. Liberal civilization, everything.
Are you legit retarded? I think that this law is fucking dumb, no service provider should be allowed to deny service to anyone unless it's a service they simply don't offer at all.
Yeah, assuming this is a troll case (as many of these are) where the plaintiff specifically made the request in order to get denied and then sue, then this is an illustration of how these sorts of cases can backfire. Plaintiffs that are basically trying to compel speech and expression, even from "bigots", are going to be pretty unsympathetic without real plausible deniability in their motivations, and this could end up setting precedents that are opposite of what they're aiming for.
The plaintiff was a 'gay activist'. However the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland supported him and I expect their motivation was clarity. Presumably the £500,000 legal fees is going to be paid by tax payers via the equality commission.
There's a reason why the Institute for Justice is so successful in getting landmark cases in its favor - it actually finds real people with sympathetic cases who are being harmed in unconscionable ways by whatever laws / regulations, rather than finding true believers to do shit simply to generate standing.
He already wants the wall by democrats are... walling him. Basically every time he tries several Republicans vote against it because theyre rino trash. Walls have been proven to work just ask Israel. 99% lower illegals after the wall went up. Ours would be even better made. The new nafta deal apparently saves us tens of billions over 10 years. Possibly 100b+. Mexico essentially already paid for the wall damn it.
I’m so confused. This exact same situation played out in the states and in the uk??? Very surprising in deed, but it further entrenches me in my beliefs that we all live in a computer program or something like that.
Also, the gay in the article says “it was never about a movement or a lawsuit, I just wanted to order a cake” (not exact words) but like okay why then didn’t you just go to the next bakery and order a cake if it was just about ordering a cake. Hint::::: it was never just about ordering a cake duh
Yeah why didn't those blacks just go to another restaurant. Why did anyone ever sue for civil rights ever? Confusing tbh. Why do we even have rights? The will of the fuhrer should be good enough.
My point is why are you bullshitting us with that quote. It’s annoying and disingenuous when people aren’t just like “you’re gonna treat me subhuman, I’m gonna sue your ass up and down”, instead of “Well I just really wanted a cake, not all this other support” I obviously think they should have just made the cake because being against gay marriage is extremely silly.
That is the thing. This case is in the UK supreme court. However, it doesn't have to end there because the European court of human rights gets to overrule as a higher court than the UK supreme court.
131 comments
1 BussyShillBot 2018-10-10
About like 30 to 45 minutes ago I beat the fuck outta my dick so goddamn hard that I can't even feel my left leg, my left leg has went totally numb and my dick has also went totally numb to the point where it feels fucking weird when I take a piss.
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 SnapshillBot 2018-10-10
The people involved here probably don't even respect bussy all that much.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 ImJustaBagofHammers 2018-10-10
Conservatives when a baker refuses to make a cake for a gag couple: Private businesses have a right to refuse service to whoever they want.
Conservatives when a private website bans a conspiracy theorist, who, incidentally, censors content on his own website, for slander and libel: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
1 quality_bratwurst 2018-10-10
Radical centrists: bake the conspiracy theorists a gay cake
1 imissyouseattle 2018-10-10
Lemme know when this hot take has cooled enough to eat, fam
1 uniqueguy263 2018-10-10
Bake the gays an infowars cake
1 jwil191 2018-10-10
Whatever happened to spitting in the food of customers you hated?
1 Wololol0w 2018-10-10
Except only one of those cases had faggots pulling a stunt for lawsuit money. It doesn't really matter. Gay, straight, you're all wajib ul qatal for me. <3
1 jallopsmith 2018-10-10
Just make ur own internet with 95% of the market cap shared between 4 companies bro
1 Dogcheese- 2018-10-10
If you’ve managed to step on the feet of 4 separate companies with the knowledge that they basically run or have a say in all of the top websites on the planet then you deserve to be banned off of it
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
lol
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
haha its all teh jews
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
theyre all friends and pretend activists that think they have a right to curate society, and they dont
theyre not good people just because their interests coincidentally align with yours right now, you shouldnt just throw all the safeguards against them out the window
1 shallowm 2018-10-10
Guess who decided that corporations are people?
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
thats not actually a real thing though its just an assertion that people rolled their eyes at
1 shallowm 2018-10-10
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v._Southern_Pacific_Railroad_Co.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-10-10
Yeah this thinking definitely has zero bad repercussions.
1 Thisisepicstein 2018-10-10
ALL HAIL THE MEGACORPORATIONS THEY DECIDE WHO IS RIGHT AND WHO IS WRONG
1 Dogcheese- 2018-10-10
“Dammit why did this hornet sting me? All I did was throw a rock at its nest so why is it fighting back?!?!”
Daily reminder that cutting you off from social media isn’t infringing on your human rights
1 Thisisepicstein 2018-10-10
Daily reminder that in the modern world most communication happens through social media. Denying people access to the big platforms that everyone uses is basically silencing them. It's hilarious you think giving silicone valley more power won't lead to disaster
1 Dogcheese- 2018-10-10
You can be kicked off someone’s property for screaming, you can be kicked off of government property for screaming, and you can be kicked off a public park for screaming. Do you know what you will also be charged with? public nuisance. If somebody owns it then you don’t get to do whatever you want with it and they aren’t forced to let you.
Not giving more power just defending the right they already have:
1 Thisisepicstein 2018-10-10
In a few years you won't be able to vote without having a social media account I'm sure you'll still be happy with what they have when that time comes
1 Dogcheese- 2018-10-10
I’m happy to see you ran out of an argument and have resorted to crack pipe conspiracy theory
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2018-10-10
This is retarded.
1 shallowm 2018-10-10
a
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
Literally your "beliefs" are pornography to any sane human being and should be treated equivalently.
1 TalsarWasHere 2018-10-10
The american rights new stance:
Free MarketsREGULATIONSSmall GovernmentBIG GOVERNMENTAll because the freedoms they were supposedly willing to die for were used in a way that hurt their fee fees.
1 shallowm 2018-10-10
a
1 FearOfBees 2018-10-10
Yes because a human free speech and religious rights are the same thing
1 Dogcheese- 2018-10-10
Yeah but then you’d just call YouTube “based and redpilled”
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
private businesses that arent a monopoly have the right to refuse service, whereas something like a utility company cant even if theyre privately owned
the dispute is whether a company like google or facebook counts as a monopoly considering it effectively works as one
1 Dogcheese- 2018-10-10
They only function as a monopoly because people make them like that you ape. It’s not like food, health, or safety. They get to have a bias or censor people because it’s impossible to harm someone by banning them from twitter.
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
lol the mental gymnastics
id argue that they dont and theyll be subject to antitrust laws if they dont clean up their acts
and a company effectively removing people that disagree with thems ability to speak online is harmful
just make your own internet owned by 4 media corporations bro
1 Dogcheese- 2018-10-10
Removing you from a luxury that you don’t own isn’t harmful you spastic. Also, people remove other people from shit in real life all the time if they get sick of them, see public disturbance.
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
speaking in public isnt a luxury and speaking on the internet is the same as speaking in public
if you buy the land the town square resides on you dont suddenly get to control whats said there
google and facebook and twitter deliberately established themselves as a defacto default place to speak, with the expectation that theyd abide by social contracts and not faggot it up because of political leanings
then once they became popular enough they started fucking people
they really all need to be broken up and thats probably going to happen before trump gets out of office
1 Dogcheese- 2018-10-10
Speaking on the internet is not the same as speaking in public in any way other than the speaking part.
You can still freely choose to say what you want in public or apply for an interview or talk with an organization.
Just because you’re not allowed a medium to broadcast your voice doesn’t mean your voice is being silenced it just means you’re only able to use your own voice with no external help.
Also lol at trump having any impact in how legislation gets done DDF assemble!
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
oh and coincidentally we own all the other mediums too and you cant use those! sorry! guess you dont have a voice
only really really stupid people dont see the problem with ceding control to corporations
hes done heaps since he became president lol what are you even talking about
if he hasnt achieved anything why is everyone crying so hard
1 Dogcheese- 2018-10-10
I like how you meme arrowed the first part and left out the bit about not being allowed a medium isn’t silencing you. Go outside and state your views go find a news outlet near you or go to rallies and try and get your voice heard. None of those places require social media.
Oh and cope harder about Daddy being a moron with no respect from his staff
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
if all the mediums align and work together then its exactly the same
lol dude
chaos in the trump admin
like anyone believes the dumb stories about "omg trump dumb and everyone hates him"
everyone important respects what hes doing, if you hate him u a lolcow that doesnt know stuff basically
1 Dogcheese- 2018-10-10
“Hah duuude lol like why should I put in time and effort to increase my standing and give my words media attention and influence when I can screech MAGA and libtard tearz if a company is forced to host me?”
I’ll bet
Did you have a stroke writing that? From the sentence structure to how unaware you have to be to say that on this subreddit?
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
lol dude what
"just change what you say to what google thinks is acceptable, duh!"
are you an npc
yeah of my dick
1 Dogcheese- 2018-10-10
MDEcels should just be given a nice valley so they can drown in a flood of monster energy and stale cum
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
i personally enjoy how the average drama poster is now basically gawker writer level
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
lol why are you pretending to be interested in justice instead of just silencing everyone that annoys you
thankfully giant overarching media conglomerates will always be on your side right
1 taytaybraps 2018-10-10
Also
1 BeerusandChampa4ever 2018-10-10
Straw man destroyed epic style
1 Matues49 2018-10-10
Tbh, this is a pretty reasonable verdict. They didn't deny him service because he was gay, they denied to write a specific message on the cake they baked for him due to their beliefs (retarded as they are).
Same way a baker can refuse to make a cake with a writing "GAS THE FOIDS - WHITE SHARIA NOW on it.
1 ImJustaBagofHammers 2018-10-10
I agree, but the hypocrisy people have on this issue is incredible.
1 Matues49 2018-10-10
Oh yeah, if this was some tranny baker telling a bunch of Christcucks to gtfo, MAGAcels would be seething and screeching about their frozen peaches & white genocide.
1 KingOfClownWorld 2018-10-10
That already happened and people complained but it didn't need the Supreme Court to get involved..
1 Matues49 2018-10-10
Dude, MAGAtards literally tried to plant a fake story on major newspapper just so they can cry about how they are being persecuted afterwards..
LGBTIQTBBQAA++ soyfiends have nothing on them.
1 GasTheBlues 2018-10-10
Libshits tried to make a false sexual assault accusation to interfere with the supreme court nomination so I’d get off that high horse if I were you, faggot.
1 Matues49 2018-10-10
It's time to ➡ 🏃 🏠
1 GasTheBlues 2018-10-10
Walk backwards into a house?
1 Etsuko1 2018-10-10
Jog backwards into a cliff
1 GasTheBlues 2018-10-10
Into a cliff? So like jog backwards into a wall?
1 Etsuko1 2018-10-10
Yes, jog backwards into a wall. Repeatadly and headfirst
1 GasTheBlues 2018-10-10
Jog backwards headfirst? Jesus fucking christ lmao.
1 Etsuko1 2018-10-10
Push you stomach out and push your head backwards. I know you can do it, stop making excuses
1 HailSanta2512 2018-10-10
as is tradition
1 Lindseyisagirlsname 2018-10-10
OUT
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
yd u rape me
1 the_popcorn_pisser 2018-10-10
This is some HARDCORE deflection. Nothing to do with what they were talking about lmao.
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
james o keefe is unironically more reliable journalism than the washington post
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
I'm a subscriber to the Washington Post
They're doing going words counteracting the legion of Putin bots that brainwashed you at some point in time
When someone who's intelligence has been totally removed is presented with reality, it seems laughable and insane
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
lol is this a parody account
1 lightfire409 2018-10-10
whoa guis we got a non-NPC here
1 Mikelan 2018-10-10
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-10-10
cope harder lmao
1 KingOfClownWorld 2018-10-10
🆗🌚
1 umar4812 2018-10-10
Ed is a fffffffffffffaggot
1 error404brain 2018-10-10
Pretty sure MAGAcel were screaming the same shit when "make the fucking frog gay" dude got punted.
Both sides are just two faces of the same retarded coin.
1 Lostvegasnightmare 2018-10-10
Pretty sure you're a retard who doesn't know what he's talking about.
The case ruled today that the man was not discriminated on account of his views, whereas Jones clearly was. I do agree though that the fucking retards who couldn't choke on each others' dicks hard enough when Jones got banned are crying about this case.
1 error404brain 2018-10-10
You need to go back. out! Out ! Out !
1 Lostvegasnightmare 2018-10-10
Do you all just revert to mindless chanting when you're shown up as the morons you are, or just most of you?
1 Agenda_Poster 2018-10-10
Hey pal, go eat some brainforce and get back to us after you've teased daddy jones' cummies out
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
This was in the United Kingdom. The case was about the words in the law of the United Kingdom. People in the UK don't have rights like we do in the US so all this moral stuff is totally irrelevant. It's not because gays are second class citizens like you think they should be in an ideal non-degenerate society, nor because everyone's rights are protected equally as in our crazy SJW vision. Literally there is no constitution in the UK so all of that is irrelevant.
1 Destirigon 2018-10-10
One of the most terrifying and disappointing developments in today's society is that free speech went from something important and worth fighting for to something that is made fun of.
1 TalsarWasHere 2018-10-10
It's mostly made fun of when used by idiots who think it's a defense against criticism. Anyone who cries free speech without even bothering to know what it means deserves to be mocked ruthlessly.
1 Destirigon 2018-10-10
True, free speech does not mean what you say can't be criticized. But most of the time nowadays it isn't, it's censored instead.
1 dogwheiner 2018-10-10
I was gonna say it's also idiots that deny other people's free speech and freedom of association by crying "censorship" when someone kicks them to the curb, but you went ahead and made that point firsthand it seems.
1 Destirigon 2018-10-10
Banning someone from a webiste is not free speech, it's the opposite.
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
Arguing that you should be able to freely say your beliefs is literally like arguing that people should be able to scribble pornography on television. You are psychotic and your beliefs are pornography and utterly irrational. One side of the political spectrum is standard human reason; the other side, something went wrong at some point and they've devolved below animals.
1 Destirigon 2018-10-10
Which they should.
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
Yeah the freedom to deny service to minorities you find offensive in public places
That's like somewhere in the constitution right
If you want to deny services to minorities, try moving to a different country, like a fascist one where there's no freedom like you salivate about, and where people are just savages. That's the natural state of whites, that was the state you were in all through the middle ages until we of liberal civilization rescued you. Now you think you are the ones responsible for all of our advances? We need to leave you high and dry. You have gotten too cocky. White civilization is responsible for nothing. Liberal civilization, everything.
1 Destirigon 2018-10-10
Are you legit retarded? I think that this law is fucking dumb, no service provider should be allowed to deny service to anyone unless it's a service they simply don't offer at all.
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
yuck nobody wants a tranny to make their food
1 LightUmbra 2018-10-10
You're just lucky your mom makes it for you.
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
Holy fuck man you agree aren't you scared for your karma?!?!?!?!?!?
1 a_cute_grill 2018-10-10
the church wins again baby! can't stop. won't stop.
1 RyuunDragon 2018-10-10
Yeah they sure won when abortion became legal in ireland
1 Jas0nJewnova 2018-10-10
Try and refuse me bitch, see what happens
1 mtg_liebestod 2018-10-10
Yeah, assuming this is a troll case (as many of these are) where the plaintiff specifically made the request in order to get denied and then sue, then this is an illustration of how these sorts of cases can backfire. Plaintiffs that are basically trying to compel speech and expression, even from "bigots", are going to be pretty unsympathetic without real plausible deniability in their motivations, and this could end up setting precedents that are opposite of what they're aiming for.
1 AgentPao 2018-10-10
The plaintiff was a 'gay activist'. However the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland supported him and I expect their motivation was clarity. Presumably the £500,000 legal fees is going to be paid by tax payers via the equality commission.
1 mtg_liebestod 2018-10-10
There's a reason why the Institute for Justice is so successful in getting landmark cases in its favor - it actually finds real people with sympathetic cases who are being harmed in unconscionable ways by whatever laws / regulations, rather than finding true believers to do shit simply to generate standing.
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
You hate either because like all rightists you hate freedom
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
Why are you trying to compel Facebook and Twitter into reiterating your pornographic and disgusting beliefs?
1 mtg_liebestod 2018-10-10
Wut
1 ______________pewpew 2018-10-10
Totally equivalent 🙄
1 damaged_unicycles 2018-10-10
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
All conservatives should be banned from all social media, there's no reason that you have a right to compel speech out of them.
1 ______________pewpew 2018-10-10
Believing in killing people is totally comparable to marriage rights omg you guys truly are retarded
1 damaged_unicycles 2018-10-10
Sharia will take you away too, Inshallah
1 bigberthaboy 2018-10-10
What really matters is that the highest court in the us could put their efforts towards this pressing matter.
1 captainpriapism 2018-10-10
people have been saying that for a while
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
Jesus Christ I can't wait for mayocide
You're retarded and have no clue what you're talking about, like all whites you are incapable of being educated.
1 headasplodes_bot 2018-10-10
Hi! A "person" from this sub has a message for you.
The message is as follows:
"dude mayocide lmao" -headasplodes
This person found your comment funny and wanted to let you know. Have a nice day! 😊
I am a bot
Do you like the "dude [x] lmao" thing that headasplodes (the user, not the bot) is doing? Vote here!
Do you like this bot (me)? Vote here!
Tell me your thoughts and confessions here!
1 taytaybraps 2018-10-10
user reports:
lol you might have struck an MDEtard nerve or two
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
lol nice
1 Alicesnakebae 2018-10-10
Can you expect any less from Mayo Christcucks they still think being gay is wrong
1 Destirigon 2018-10-10
This is a sad verdict because, by extension, it allows the right of sites like Reddit and Twitter to censor content.
1 pepperouchau 2018-10-10
1 FearOfBees 2018-10-10
Trump wants to regulate monopoly like websites so they cant. Not sure when hes getting on that.
1 Destirigon 2018-10-10
Trump wants to do many things and does significantly less. Let's talk when the wall is standing...
1 FearOfBees 2018-10-10
He already wants the wall by democrats are... walling him. Basically every time he tries several Republicans vote against it because theyre rino trash. Walls have been proven to work just ask Israel. 99% lower illegals after the wall went up. Ours would be even better made. The new nafta deal apparently saves us tens of billions over 10 years. Possibly 100b+. Mexico essentially already paid for the wall damn it.
1 Mikelan 2018-10-10
Is this a parody account
1 OnionBits 2018-10-10
In other news:
LGBTQ BAKERY FORCED TO MAKE NAZI CAKE
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
In other news:
Hopefully white civilization doesn't exist in a century
1 taytaybraps 2018-10-10
user reports:
I for one enjoy your dedication to furthering the mayocide.
1 cmakk1012 2018-10-10
Ian Paisley is relevant? lmao Northern Ireland
1 motherjoad 2018-10-10
I’m so confused. This exact same situation played out in the states and in the uk??? Very surprising in deed, but it further entrenches me in my beliefs that we all live in a computer program or something like that.
Also, the gay in the article says “it was never about a movement or a lawsuit, I just wanted to order a cake” (not exact words) but like okay why then didn’t you just go to the next bakery and order a cake if it was just about ordering a cake. Hint::::: it was never just about ordering a cake duh
1 Watermark03 2018-10-10
Yeah why didn't those blacks just go to another restaurant. Why did anyone ever sue for civil rights ever? Confusing tbh. Why do we even have rights? The will of the fuhrer should be good enough.
1 motherjoad 2018-10-10
My point is why are you bullshitting us with that quote. It’s annoying and disingenuous when people aren’t just like “you’re gonna treat me subhuman, I’m gonna sue your ass up and down”, instead of “Well I just really wanted a cake, not all this other support” I obviously think they should have just made the cake because being against gay marriage is extremely silly.
1 Think_Once 2018-10-10
No one cares about news out of Bongistan.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-10-10
The britbongs aren't even being original with their gay cake lawsuits
1 EternallyMiffed 2018-10-10
Legalize gay weed lmao
1 ReasonableCup 2018-10-10
LEGALIZE GAY BUSSY
1 ConfuseTheJews 2018-10-10
britain still exists? thought they'd already gone over to being an american state or european colony
1 AgentPao 2018-10-10
That is the thing. This case is in the UK supreme court. However, it doesn't have to end there because the European court of human rights gets to overrule as a higher court than the UK supreme court.
1 DukeOfSquirrels 2018-10-10
tbh Id get up in that cake-baking bussy so hard, pipe some vanilla creme pat up in his choux pastry if ya know what i meannn