And what's Spicer going to say, "Oh yeah, it's all legit!" First of all, he's not even one of the 10, and you can tell Trump wouldn't let him in on it. And second of all, if he did say that, it would just make tons of people bombard him with more questions about it, which he really knows nothing about. This is top level Military Intel at the highest level of Classified Clearance.

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, removeddit.com, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

True fact: Everyone on Venezuela is a millionaire.

Not only that, by next week they'll all be billionaires!

Nothing wrong with this.

Wait... Money has no value?

Especially WoW players.

fucking tankies

Time to break out the anti-tankie guns again!

Right?

Eat.The.Rich

Why is there even a debate? If course it is.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Drama/comments/9nagab/rtruereddit_unironically_advocates_for_killing/e7l9dqr/

😡

Rich people are innately superior, tho.

Only a bootlicker would say that.

I am not a race traitor, poor scum.

They have money? You want money. Why not take money?

Now you are the millionaire with the money

Wait doyou actually think the goal of communism is to take other peoples money? Lol.

No, goal of communism is to obviously be a failure. Very successful this way

Goal of killing millionaires is to get millionaire money, take nice millionaire things from the houses they own

Ok whatevs

That was hard to read.

WE NEED A REVOLUTION TO MURDER ALL (((MILLIONAIRES))). DEATH TO THE JEWISH BOURGEOISIE!!!!!

[MADE BY STRASSER GANG]

WE NEED A REVOLUTION TO MURDER ALL (((MILLIONAIRES))). DEATH TO THE (((BOURGEOISIE)))!!!!!

[MADE BY STRASSER GANG]

nazbol gang rising up, both want to kill the (((wealthy white men))) in power

o7

Tankies: “wealth inequality is unethical”

Also tankies: “there is nothing wrong with killing the rich”

🤔🤔🤔

Where's the contradiction?

But why male models?

T. Poor person

That just having a lot of paper lying around is immoral but killing people who have this paper is fine.

Not a contradiction if you view the latter group as immoral...

You can view someone as immoral without wanting to kill them, psychopath.

So?

So you shouldn't view killing millions of people as morally justified, whether or not you think the things they do are immoral. That's not how we do things in sane land.

According to you, not them. You wouldve figured this out if you read the original comment instead of being a giant moralfag.

You still shouldn't be eager to press the nuke button on a bunch of baby killers. If you're as willing to kill as internet commies are you shouldn't have the power to.

Moralfag me harder daddy

According to every common belief of modern society, it's morally wrong to not bend over and let me wreck that bussyhole to gapeville and back.

Keep going im almost there

Killing only comes when they refuse to renounce their immorality.

I view you as immoral for visiting /r/Drama. Do you renounce your allegiance, dramanaut? Do it or I kill you.

Well done, saved.

Every murderous regime in the history of humanity has used that exact line of thinking to justify their actions.

Glad to see you are on the right track.

I didnt endorse it you retard, im saying its logically sound

It's not. It's only logically sound if you think killing people who are immoral by your definition is moral.

It's only logically sound if you think that it's morally a-okay to kill people who are immoral by your definition of immoral.

Yes that is literally what i was saying...

And if you think that you are literally a psycho and you would die in your ideal version of the world because someone else would view you as immoral. It's dumb.

And this is completely irrelevant to the original comment that started this discussion.

And this is completely irrelevant to the original comment that started this discussion.

His implied point is that their morals are obviously flimsy if they want to kill people who they view as morally wrong. A slow 2 year old could have figured that out 😂

His implied point is that their morals are obviously flimsy if they want to kill people who they view as morally wrong. A slow 2 year old could have figured that out 😂

Im aware. He also implied there was a logical contradiction, which there isnt.

Literally every genocidal maniac has seen themselves as morally justified because the people they're killing are morally wrong, either because of their existence or because of how they view the genocided group's actions. Why do you think genocidal commies are any different than the rest?

I don't. You sure you're replying to the right person? My view is that there is no contradiction in their beliefs.

There was no contradiction in Hitler's beliefs, because he believed Jews to be less than human. His views were still retarded, because it's wrong and inaccurate to classify a group of people as subhuman. There doesn't need to be a contradiction for the views to be retarded. The original comment didn't imply there was a contradiction, it pointed out their obvious lack of moral reasoning. You responded "what's the contradiction," as if there needs to be one for the view to not be retarded.

Ok sweaty

I'm glad we finally settled this whole communism thing. Now everyone can stop arguing

You were put down, in the future please refrain from discussing subjects you have no education in.

The only thing put down here is my feelings from you insulting me, faggot.

OUT OUT OUT

Where exactly do you think I'm from you low IQ outposter

Retardistan?

Ok well you got me there 😓

I like how you're pretending to only care about logic here while arguing in favor of wealthicide lower down in the thread.

Different comment chain, no?

Yes, just seems like you're misrepresenting where you're coming from.

Do you actually like it?

It's only logically sound if you think that it's morally a-okay to kill people who are immoral by your definition of immoral.

Yea, Churchill was a brutal maniac for killing all those germans.

That's war. Do you think war is the same as genocide?

Not entierly dissimmilar, are they?

Completely dissimilar. Do you view someone getting knocked out in a agreed-upon fight between two people as the same thing as someone getting sucker punched? Hint: one makes the person who did the knocking-out less of a cunt.

Where the fuck did you get the notion that wars are agreed-upon, or merely consisting of two combatants?

Do you know what the phrase "declaration of war" means?

Dumbass, the two people are a metaphor.

Both a codelet and a brainlet. Pathetic.

Yes, obviously, so why the fuck do you equate war with some agreed upon fight between two parties. When german Battleships entered Norwegian oceans, they came with no decleration of anything at all.

decleration

Nice spelling 😂😂😂😂😂😂

If you are pointing out typos you are obviously out of arguments.

arguements

LMAO

!Made you look 😉!<

Ok, fuck, you actually bamboozeled me something right proper just there.

a

Hence why the death penalty is dumb!

And it's not like you're losing "punishing power" without it. I'd rather Hitler have been locked up for the rest of his life than be dead. Only one is a punishment you have to actually experience.

The argument isn't sufficiently developed to be considered logically sound. The truth value of the premises "rich people are immoral" and "immoral people should be killed" aren't demonstrated at all (and haven't been imo). But I would agree that it is valid.

Every murderous regime in history has been run by rich people.

I think it's fine, but then again I'm not a commie, just an amoral psychopath.

So what? Their logic holds, if you agree with them. If the wealthy are evil parasites responsible for poverty, exploitation, colonialism, imperialism, create laws to protect and benefit themselves, then killing them seems like the logical conclusion. If peaceful protest and writing articles/essays does nothing, political violence does get shit done.

Notice when Black Americans started to arm themselves, the right wing suddenly loved the idea of gun control. Having Jeff Bezos, politicians and other billionaires frightened might terrify them into improving standard of living for the majority of people.

Amazon raising it's wage to $15 for most employees (drivers apparently aren't "employees"), was mostly due to massive pressure by unions and Bernie pushing the "Stop Bezos Act".

So what? Their logic holds, if you agree with them.

Any retard's logic holds if you agree with everything they say.

If the wealthy are evil parasites responsible for poverty, exploitation, colonialism, imperialism, create laws to protect and benefit themselves, then killing them seems like the logical conclusion

No it doesn't.

Class war is worse than all of those combined. War is shit. And there'll just be new wealthy people.

Notice when Black Americans started to arm themselves,

The civil war?

Jeff Bezos, politicians and other billionaires frightened might terrify them into

• doing what I want them to do

• doing what they are able to do to maintain their safety and wealth

One of those makes sense, one of them makes you retarded

Expecting an unironic centrist to know anything

The fact that rich people and corporations can enact capital flight doesn't justify their actions. Unless you think corporations polluting the environment, lobbying for wars and sabotaging public healthcare and regulations is "good".

The civil war?

No, the Black Panthers.

The fact that rich people and corporations can enact capital flight doesn't

No, but it does make the idea that you can threaten their safety to achieve your goals pretty fucking retarded

No, the Black Panthers.

So way, way, way after black people took up arms

If you think Bezos raising wages was anything but a corporate powerplay to price his competitors out of the market you are a beta wave brainlet.

The message of Bezos raising wages for (most) of his employees, is "You don't need a union". It's not just a corporate power play against his competitors.

So what? Their logic holds, if you agree with them. If the wealthy are evil parasites responsible for poverty, exploitation, colonialism, imperialism, create laws to protect and benefit themselves, then killing them seems like the logical conclusion. If peaceful protest and writing articles/essays does nothing, political violence does get shit done.

That's a pretty gigantic 'if'.

Overusing Centrist memes.

"Well, actually".

Centrists are in no position to talk about economics. You lack even the minimal amount of self awareness for most humans, resorting to the "lel economics 101" meme. Wealthy people will always do anything to further their interests. The fact you think the wealthy and powerful aren't responsible for wars, poverty, weakening labour laws, environmental laws tells me you are at MDE levels of stupidity.

If your proposal is neoliberalism, it's shit, and you deserve to be laughed at.

Well gosh you've obviously got me figured out so well I guess there's nothing more I need to say.

Unironical commie-nazies.

my favorite arguments are neolibs vs tankies

Neoliberals are (barely) more coherent lolbertarians that can read a graph.

this

I always get a kick out of the idea that Bezos has a Wells Fargo account with 100 billion in it and not just that the founder of one of the biggest companies on earth holds stock in his own company.

socialists who say this believe that they are the only ones who know anything about the economy

Umm i thought he kept it all in gold coins in his house

Pretty sure he keeps it stored in old timey pirate treasure chests buried across the continental United states

I think he has a giant vault like Scrooge McDuck

As Marxists, we are...

Retarded

Gotta love all this praise for the USSR. Back when i watched them turn down the Berlin Wall, the East Germans were quickly putting it back together so they can keep their healthcare and literacy.

These guys are the BANE of every history photo sub.

Commies really are immune to many of the rules on this site

In Communist Reddit, shit poster bans you.

I just think it's funny that we are supposed to be worried about a few inbred nazis running around in the US, when literal communists are allowed to spout their bullshit all over the 0lace without anyone raising much of a peep.

Thank God the "communists" are really just a bunch of soyboys larping, and not people actually capable of doing anything.

1 in 5 humanities professors are outright Marxists.

And unlike with nazis, their moderates never denounce them.

Luckily humanities professors aren’t people

Come on sweaty, killing millions of Ukrainians is one thing, but killing millions of God's chosen? Now that's too far!

I am very serious

Don't worry, we're not kidding about the helicopter rides, either.

ps.reddit.com

This is an american subreddit

oh cool

Every single time they say they want to kill rich people there is some user who asks them if they are joking. And every single time this user will try to tell them killing people for having a lot of money is immoral.

It is acceptable to murder millionaires and homeless people and that’s it.

kill the commies

Killing (a person), ok it's unethical. Now is it a necessary evil? Two different questions the first of which shouldn't ever have to be asked.

Killing a millionaire is a necessary evil to get my Xbox.

Well fuck...now there's a real moral quandary.

Seems pretty clear to me. 🤷‍♂️

Commies hate wealth, that's why they love communism

Cry about it, richers

Cry into your piles of money while internet dorks post angrily about you.

a) not really a suprise but soviet_27 and literal_t34 are tankies, which is clear by going through their postinf history a little.

b) you know, it's funny when a imbecile living out of his moms cash calls an owner of a small cafe in for example Armenia a bourgie.

The state is allowed to steal in capitalist societies

Time for your regular reminder that all anarchists are libertarians who’ve figured out that they’ll never get rich.

I said it once and I will say it again, tankies are worse than Jews.

Serious Post:Weren't the most successful development stories like fash-lite capitalistic dictatorships? like S. Korea under this guy, Chile under this guy, Taiwan under these Fash, even in other region's of the world like Spain under this guy and Portugal under this guy. Hell even in Iran this guy

The fastest growing economy in history was Meiji Japan, so basically fash-lite = economic growth.

Why stop at millionaires? Let’s kill the billionaires too.

CMV: if you have a job murdering Communists is just self defense