Honestly, if you read a Reuters story and then skim articles covering the same story on HuffPost and Breitbart you'll have about as good an understanding both of the actual event and the assorted narratives as you're likely to get in the modern media environment.
It unironically enrages me how many retards there are who actually get all of their news from from /pol/ and anime-twitter. We need a final solution to the /pol/ack problem.
Reuters has a policy of taking a "value-neutral approach," which extends to not using the word "terrorist" in its stories, a practice which has attracted criticism following the September 11 attacks.[16]Reuters' editorial policy states: "We are committed to reporting the facts and in all situations avoid the use of emotive terms. The only exception is when we are quoting someone directly or in indirect speech."[17](The Associated Press, by contrast, does use the term "terrorist" in reference to non-governmental organizations who carry out attacks on civilian populations.[16])
Following the 11 September attacks, Reuters global head of news Stephen Jukes reiterated the policy in an internal memo and later explained to media columnist Howard Kurtz (who criticized the policy): "We all know that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, and that Reuters upholds the principle that we do not use the word terrorist...We're trying to treat everyone on a level playing field, however tragic it's been and however awful and cataclysmic for the American people and people around the world. We're there to tell the story. We're not there to evaluate the moral case."[16]
In addition to Reuters which has already been sufficiently jerked in this thread:
The Economist. Obviously they lean neolib as a whole (which is kind of centrist anyway) but they feature contributions from across the political spectrum occasionally, and their style guide is very clean and neutral.
Roll Call Capitol politics centric organization with good sourcing to members of congress on both sides of the aisle.
Government Executive Under appreciated media arm targeted at the government employee demographic, which means they're often reporting on very under covered stories about things happening within federal agencies. Really good for regulatory news.
35 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-10-17
They targeted gamers. Gamers.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 a_cute_grill 2018-10-17
1 imissyouseattle 2018-10-17
Reuters and Drudge
1 imissyouseattle 2018-10-17
Using Google to find the primary source.
1 Baconlightning 2018-10-17
r/drama
1 Matues49 2018-10-17
Reuters is pretty good
1 -absolutego- 2018-10-17
Honestly, if you read a Reuters story and then skim articles covering the same story on HuffPost and Breitbart you'll have about as good an understanding both of the actual event and the assorted narratives as you're likely to get in the modern media environment.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-10-17
/pol/ maymays
1 AlecOzzyHillPitas 2018-10-17
It unironically enrages me how many retards there are who actually get all of their news from from /pol/ and anime-twitter. We need a final solution to the /pol/ack problem.
1 Banned4Shitposting 2018-10-17
realclearpolitics.com
1 BIknkbtKitNwniS 2018-10-17
Reuters is just the best
1 13chaggit 2018-10-17
Not taking a side on 9/11? That's some pretty radical centrism.
1 tyuijvhvhcfcjf 2018-10-17
Inshallah
1 cavides 2018-10-17
Tim Pool's youtube channels. He is aggressively mild and reasonable.
1 Honk4Tits 2018-10-17
There's an Associated Press feed app, I usually get my news there
1 [deleted] 2018-10-17
[removed]
1 justcool393 2018-10-17
lol your post got spam filtered by reddit
1 Yiin 2018-10-17
tfw when you realize who holds the real power
1 Yiin 2018-10-17
Check out list
1 AlecOzzyHillPitas 2018-10-17
Hey idiot. First rule of The Place is don't talk about The Place. Let alone talking about in fucking r/drama.
In other words: Delete this nephew.
1 Yiin 2018-10-17
good idea
1 Heydammit 2018-10-17
Too late retard it got caught by removeddit now your secret club is going to get cucked hard by radical centrists.
1 Yiin 2018-10-17
He really should have just messaged me if he was that worried
1 Heydammit 2018-10-17
Seriously, know one would've been the wiser.
1 AlecOzzyHillPitas 2018-10-17
In addition to Reuters which has already been sufficiently jerked in this thread:
1 ugongitbuttraped 2018-10-17
Ever notice how Nate Silver’s constant “errors” always happen in only one direction?
1 LeninadeOfficial 2018-10-17
/r/FULLCOMMUNISM
1 ugongitbuttraped 2018-10-17
Nah. Too right wing.
1 Burnnoticelover 2018-10-17
A CTH regular I see.
1 Mircy 2018-10-17
Tankies more like famines that your parents blamed on America for fear of getting disappeared
1 Verlieren_ist_Unser 2018-10-17
Styxhexenhammer666
1 Sedjin 2018-10-17
Wikipedia. I create my own worldview from FACTS.
1 preserved_fish 2018-10-17
[citation needed]
1 preserved_fish 2018-10-17
I read the NYT and WSJ and split the difference. Also the Economist.
1 shaun_krant 2018-10-17
My only news source is r/drama threads and cdace comments