We can submit quotes?

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, removeddit.com, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

I feel like the only answer to this is either kicking out the non-cis contenders or letting the cis athletes do any and all performance enhancing drugs they can handle

One league for everyone, women never win an event again outside of gymnastics.

Maybe on the floor or in rhythmic gymnastics like ribbon and hoops, but men absolutely beastmode every other type form of it.

On the one hand, men have more strength to lift themselves, on the other hand female gymnasts are light as fuck. But yeah, men will likely win anything involving strength so long as their weight isn't a hindrance.

A separate all-drugs olympics would be a sight to behold.

The real question will be whether they can break the 5-second 100m and collect their medal before their heart explodes.

The all drugs olympics is just the olympics.

The olympics doesn't have the "coked-up hurdles" though. Or the "midgets on meth football".

there's an infuriating amount of retardation in that thread

The one person was being deliberately stupid in order not to lose the argument.

I actually blame those who indulge mentally disabled people to keep poking at the few still connected brain cells and squeeze last drop of crazy remaining.

I actually blame those who indulge mentally disabled people

But they have good fundamentals!

they were not being deliberately stupid, they are that stupid

they were also claiming that those hoax gender studies articles might have a point, when that shit came out

I'm talking about the person who has no idea that men and women are different physiologically.

that queerbees person right?

yeah, god I wish we could still ping

I too was a little confused by how much the completely idiotic comments were being upvoted until I saw it was /r/AskFeminists

Could you back this claim up? There's no argument that when trans people compete they sometimes win, and that trans guys are guys and should be competing with guys, but could you back up this idea that trans women who have been on hormones for a significant period of time out perform cis women with evidence?

Yes, hello, can you prove that women on testosterone crush non druggy women?

(Smash cut to video of Fallon Fox caving a woman's skull in)

Hammer hand!

[removed]

This isn’t just an issue for Trans women, cis women with naturally high testosterone also have an advantage. If they allowed Men and Women to compete at the same time and men outperformed every time, feminists would blow a fuse and fight for separation.

I guess if you aren't fastest, you aren't the best. Or is that just what straight men tell themselves makes for great sex? lol

but, seriously, women are told from the moment they're born until they day they die that they are inferior to men. They are punished for exceeding men, erased for beating men, and regularly forgotten immediately after they proven themselves better than a man. Why shouldn't we expect the records to say "men are better"---men write the rules and the records.

The fastest person shouldn't win a race. Also, records are a conspiracy.

When participation trophy Winner discover the Olympics this is what happen

I don't think there was any sport participation involved.

Exactly. Male created sports place first place above all others because of the symbol "1" representing the male phallus. But is first place really any better than the other places? Why not consider fifth place the winner, represented by the Roman numeral "V" for VAGINA?

Actually rhe the fifth place position is now symbolic of the savage V-cut on my abs, because men are good at appropriation toom

I guess if you aren't fastest, you aren't the best.

Yes. That's the entire fucking point of competitive sports. You absolute brainlet.

Completely worth the ban, imo.

Ugh, she's a mod.

I genuinely thought that was a troll playing at "irrational feminist who can't make a coherent argument". Then she turned on the mod flair.

This isn't even my final FOOOOOOOOOOOOOORM!

Oh, you have no idea how cathartic that was.

have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron. fuck that blemq supporter.

This was a great post lol

http://archive.is/dNKzc