You're not even trying to be witty or anything, you're just circlejerking. How does it feel literally karma whoring, like, actually just being a human who cares enough to type multiple comments for no purpose except to draw a nearby majority's attention to the fact that you agree with them?
Here’s my verdict : how the heck did you not know??? If you’re that retarded you just deserve to be gassed without trial. I can spot a teenager by nothing but a mere glance, don’t even get me started on an actual conversation with one.
Women generally cannot give meaningful sexual consent to men, similar to how a student cannot give meaningful sexual consent to their teacher, a prisoner to a prison guard, or a child to an adult.
This is because of the power differentials that exist between men and women. Men are generally physically stronger than women, have more societal power, make more money (see: the wage gap), and have a multitude of differences in their mental facilities and capabilities.
The dominant way of thinking about rape is that there is "good sex" and "bad sex." Consensual sex is "good," while non-consensual sex is rape. However, the notion of "consent" actually reinforces rape culture. The "consent" model legitimates relations of domination, shields the real content of sexual relations from scrutiny, and silences, downplays, or misrepresents gender-oppressed people’s negative experiences with sex. The reality which the "consent" model ultimately obscures is that sexuality under patriarchy is an oppressive set of practices. These practices dominate heterosexual relations but also cannot be escaped by any other form of sexuality within patriarchal society.
As of now, the vast majority of women cannot give meaningful sexual consent to men. However, with technological and societal advances, this may or may not change in the future.
I've never really understood using the "past generations of oppression" when it comes to men and women. Do they not realize that men and women have the same amount of male and female ancestors?
It's because feminists tend to be historically illiterate and view history as "women were default victims of all evil."
In reality, gender roles were enforced by both men and women, and many men also suffered. If you really want to see feminists spaz out bring up the whole "white feather" thing:
In August 1914, at the start of the First World War, Admiral Charles Fitzgerald founded the Order of the White Feather with support from the prominent author Mrs Humphrey Ward. The organization aimed to shame men into enlisting in the British army by persuading women to present them with a white feather if they were not wearing a uniform.[3][4]
This was joined by prominent feminists and suffragettes of the time, such as Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughter Christabel. They, in addition to handing out the feathers, also lobbied to institute an involuntary universal draft, which included those who lacked votes due to being too young or not owning property.
Private Norman Demuth, who had been discharged from the British Army after being wounded in 1916, received numerous white feathers after returning from the Western Front, and decided that if the women that handed them out were going to be rude to him, he was going to be rude back.[9] One of the last feathers he received was presented to him whilst he was travelling on a bus, by a lady who was sat opposite him. She handed over the feather and said, "Here's a gift for a brave soldier." Demuth replied, "Thank you very much - I wanted one of those." He then used the feather to clean out his pipe, handed it back to her and remarked, "You know we didn't get these in the trenches." The other passengers subsequently became angry with the woman and started shouting at her, much to Demuth's amusement.[10]
The supporters of the campaign were not easily put off. A woman who confronted a young man in a London park demanded to know why he was not in the army. "Because I am a German", he replied. He received a white feather anyway.
well it really isn't the same. Paedophilia is attraction to prepubescent children. Hebephilia to pubescent ones (Tanner Stages 2 and 3), while ephebophilia is attraction to older teens usually ages 15 to 19.
That's from an old BOLA post, which was absolute gold. The best part was it was only tangentially related to the post, so people immediately started wondering why they felt the need to say it in the first place.
I read some other posts there, is it really this weird in america to date a 16 year old when you are 19? I know multiple people who have even greater disparancys 25 vs 16 and no one was weirded out. (central europe)
Americans are weird like that. Some would call you a pedo for dating a 17 yo when you're 19. Also from Central Europe and age differences aren't as much of a big deal here I think.As you said teen and mid 20s for instance isn't even super uncommon
Americans call you a pedo if you are 20 and the chick is 17, as if you liking fulling developed women who have this imaginary "legal" status at 18 makes you a creep
For the first it depends on if they started dating in high school or not, but in general people who have graduated high school and are dating high schoolers are losers because high schoolers are retarded and suck to be around.
It's one thing if they started dating while they were junior/senior. But I knew some college guys that started dating high school girls back home after we had already started college. It was the epitome of pathetic.
Whoever is making these posts, you are a god. Please continue trolling /r/bestoflegaladvice, preferably with a false rape accusation post next time between a man and a woman vs a lesbian couple.
54 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-10-23
You're not even trying to be witty or anything, you're just circlejerking. How does it feel literally karma whoring, like, actually just being a human who cares enough to type multiple comments for no purpose except to draw a nearby majority's attention to the fact that you agree with them?
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 demotecontrol 2018-10-23
It’s the only way I can convince myself to stay alive, Snappy.😭😭😭
1 motherjoad 2018-10-23
Here’s my verdict : how the heck did you not know??? If you’re that retarded you just deserve to be gassed without trial. I can spot a teenager by nothing but a mere glance, don’t even get me started on an actual conversation with one.
1 HungerArtistatlunch 2018-10-23
Imagine using the 100'S OF YEARS OF OPPRESSION as an excuse to fuck kids.
1 ReddneckwithaD 2018-10-23
Dont you see? All those hundreds of women suffered just so that we could have /SS/
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-10-23
Nothing undoes the patriarchy better than raping children.
1 HailSanta2512 2018-10-23
If anyone deserves it, it's kids. They haven't done anything to not deserve it yet.
1 error404brain 2018-10-23
This, but unironically.
1 the_popcorn_pisser 2018-10-23
This is my favorite parts of the whole thing tbh.
1 shallowm 2018-10-23
Women generally cannot give meaningful sexual consent to men, similar to how a student cannot give meaningful sexual consent to their teacher, a prisoner to a prison guard, or a child to an adult.
This is because of the power differentials that exist between men and women. Men are generally physically stronger than women, have more societal power, make more money (see: the wage gap), and have a multitude of differences in their mental facilities and capabilities.
The dominant way of thinking about rape is that there is "good sex" and "bad sex." Consensual sex is "good," while non-consensual sex is rape. However, the notion of "consent" actually reinforces rape culture. The "consent" model legitimates relations of domination, shields the real content of sexual relations from scrutiny, and silences, downplays, or misrepresents gender-oppressed people’s negative experiences with sex. The reality which the "consent" model ultimately obscures is that sexuality under patriarchy is an oppressive set of practices. These practices dominate heterosexual relations but also cannot be escaped by any other form of sexuality within patriarchal society.
As of now, the vast majority of women cannot give meaningful sexual consent to men. However, with technological and societal advances, this may or may not change in the future.
1 HungerArtistatlunch 2018-10-23
Is this copypasta?
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2018-10-23
What do you think?
1 Voltairium 2018-10-23
Sauce me up fam
1 shallowm 2018-10-23
source (related /r/drama thread)
1 Voltairium 2018-10-23
Thanks boi
1 chadocide 2018-10-23
lmao those replies
1 DannyLee90 2018-10-23
Fucking lol.
1 JustLions 2018-10-23
I've never really understood using the "past generations of oppression" when it comes to men and women. Do they not realize that men and women have the same amount of male and female ancestors?
1 IVIaskerade 2018-10-23
Yeah but those male ancestors all oppressed the feeeeemales so it's ok to fuck kids Q.E.D.
1 IDFSHILL 2018-10-23
It's because feminists tend to be historically illiterate and view history as "women were default victims of all evil."
In reality, gender roles were enforced by both men and women, and many men also suffered. If you really want to see feminists spaz out bring up the whole "white feather" thing:
1 LongPostBot 2018-10-23
All those words won't bring daddy back.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 herromynameispingg 2018-10-23
He's getting a pack of smokes and coming back! He said he would!
1 bunker_man 2018-10-23
Can muslims use this excuse if the kid is white? Asking for a friend.
1 BrawndoTTM 2018-10-23
In Sweden they can
1 YameteOtosanItai 2018-10-23
okay
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-10-23
Oof.
1 YameteOtosanItai 2018-10-23
well they aren't
1 HungerArtistatlunch 2018-10-23
How do you walk with all those bullet holes in your feet?
1 YameteOtosanItai 2018-10-23
literally wat?
1 Chukril 2018-10-23
plz mods, let us ping the paedos!
1 NAGOLACOLA 2018-10-23
Good conversation starter. Go on.
1 HailSanta2512 2018-10-23
Thanks. The correct term is hebephile...
1 YameteOtosanItai 2018-10-23
15 is usually too old for hebephiles. They prefer 14 and younger in most cases. Granted they'd also be attracted to underdeveloped older girls
1 Skallerak 2018-10-23
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TB9fwJDweaU
1 YameteOtosanItai 2018-10-23
well it really isn't the same. Paedophilia is attraction to prepubescent children. Hebephilia to pubescent ones (Tanner Stages 2 and 3), while ephebophilia is attraction to older teens usually ages 15 to 19.
1 Bigbewmistaken 2018-10-23
Both want to fuck children tho
1 YameteOtosanItai 2018-10-23
well teenagers really
1 bunker_man 2018-10-23
Tbh with an opening like that I expected the thread to be about libertarianism.
1 IVIaskerade 2018-10-23
That's from an old BOLA post, which was absolute gold. The best part was it was only tangentially related to the post, so people immediately started wondering why they felt the need to say it in the first place.
1 Michelanvalo 2018-10-23
And the BOLA/LA post was a troll job from /r/opieandanthony based off Anthony's brother being on the People's Court
1 Mikeavelli 2018-10-23
The weirdest part is how much this is upvoted. BoLA usually downvotes pointing out their hypocrisy like a swarm of angry hornets.
1 bG9sIG5pY2UgdHJ5Cg 2018-10-23
Mods haven't blattered it out of existence either
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-10-23
Lol LA and BOLA always fall for the clear gender swap bait posts
1 Voltairium 2018-10-23
The relationship subs always take the bait too
1 CharlesSchwabSucks2 2018-10-23
Well fucking done whoever did this. Please keep at it and post the results
1 barnabasss 2018-10-23
I read some other posts there, is it really this weird in america to date a 16 year old when you are 19? I know multiple people who have even greater disparancys 25 vs 16 and no one was weirded out. (central europe)
1 YameteOtosanItai 2018-10-23
Americans are weird like that. Some would call you a pedo for dating a 17 yo when you're 19. Also from Central Europe and age differences aren't as much of a big deal here I think.As you said teen and mid 20s for instance isn't even super uncommon
1 leparsdon 2018-10-23
Americans call you a pedo if you are 20 and the chick is 17, as if you liking fulling developed women who have this imaginary "legal" status at 18 makes you a creep
1 Vegan_dogfucker 2018-10-23
For the first it depends on if they started dating in high school or not, but in general people who have graduated high school and are dating high schoolers are losers because high schoolers are retarded and suck to be around.
1 rnjbond 2018-10-23
The college kid attending high school prom is just sad.
1 Vegan_dogfucker 2018-10-23
It's one thing if they started dating while they were junior/senior. But I knew some college guys that started dating high school girls back home after we had already started college. It was the epitome of pathetic.
1 QinEmperor 2018-10-23
Whoever is making these posts, you are a god. Please continue trolling /r/bestoflegaladvice, preferably with a false rape accusation post next time between a man and a woman vs a lesbian couple.
1 YameteOtosanItai 2018-10-23
In what world does fucking a 15 yo make you a paedophile?
1 ArtisanalCollabo 2018-10-23
I got -20 yesterday in BoLA for asking why not having children makes one a member of a “community.” I still don’t understand why