And what's Spicer going to say, "Oh yeah, it's all legit!" First of all, he's not even one of the 10, and you can tell Trump wouldn't let him in on it. And second of all, if he did say that, it would just make tons of people bombard him with more questions about it, which he really knows nothing about. This is top level Military Intel at the highest level of Classified Clearance.

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

Why didn't you just give him the proof he wanted and end the argument instead of dragging it out?

I like my drama more au naturale. This factory farmed shit just isn't my jive

Because she rather harrass the mentally ill. She doesnt believe adolescents should have the right to their own body, making her an abuser.

ur autistic

I like how the pedo digs up a 20 day old thread to defend his kid fucking urges.

Buzzwords are truly an effective input

What is it about kids that you find so sexy?

Its theorized that men are attracted to post pubertal teens because of their high fertility. I dont know how else to describe that. Why?

How do you define kids? Is it definitive and based on objectivity or is it an arbitrary social construct?

Either way, underaged people in our society have demonstrated the ability to sexually consent.

You deleted your other reply about the fertility of young teens. Why?

I havent deleted any comments, I made 2.

Adults 25+ wanting to screw teens under 16 is beast material. The 17 - 24 year olds I’d say are adults capable of making their own decisions on sex.

Isn’t age of consent in France like 12?

I don’t believe France has an age of consent law. In the UK it’s 16

Sounds like you're projecting. You couldn't consent when you were 14? Oof embarassing.

Projecting what? The law? Society views adults fucking or wanting to fuck 12-14 year olds as beasts? That I know the difference between teenagers having sex and predators preying on kids?

I will state my views/opinions wherever the fuck I like until a court order prevents me from doing so.

Sit on that 🖕🏻and spin.

Projecting your own inability to consent to adults when you were a teen. I cant relate to this mental deficiency.

Now I’m really lmao. Sunday giggles are the best. You should tell me more about the “adults” that sexually abused me at 13-16.

This conversation is about consensual relationships between adults and teens, not abuse. Refrain from going off topic.

You should’ve taken your own advice then to keep the conversation on topic.

Apparently, virtually nobody wants to cast a direct argument. Which I find validating.

I can’t be arsed looking at your post history. What exactly is your point caller?

I like how you just arbitrarily defined what relationships are appropriate.

"If I find a relationship offensive, then persecuting people in those relationships is justified" u/GettingOnMyCocoNuts

Can a 50 year old consent to an 18 year old?

If so, was that same 18 year old unable to consent to a 25 year old when they were 17?

Right, in order to get to the belly of the beast, I need more info! Tell me about the 50 yr old financial/physical attributes and any medical problems. Also some background on the 18 year old upbringing.

Then we can deal with no:25

.. none of that is relevant to the answer, as there are an endless amount of variables that could change the situation.

Assume neither are retarded or have any other sort of similar defects

What a fuckin cop-out! All information is relevant given the fact you’ve asked about an age group all legal in the UK and other parts of the world but morally corrupt.

Actually, you're misinterpreting the question and thats what's causing problems here.

Reread my question and replace 'consent' with 'potentially consensual'. This was clearly what I had implied. Once you have done so, your questions become irrelevant.

;

I never made a claim that the mentioned relationships are inherently consensual, so no answer to your questions is relevant in that it won't change the fact that they are potentially consensual. Since they are potentially consensual, my point stands regardless of the factors involving the individuals.

"Morally corrupt" you made a claim but forgot to cite proof. How can a consensual relationship be immoral, when immorality requires wrongdoing?

Moreover, morals are subjectively defined and result from socialization. They are based on emotions, feelings, rather than facts. I could go into detail as to why your claim here is particularly disregardable specifically in this context.

Does that word salad come with a decent dressing? Are you playing the 50 year old perv, the 25 year old entitled prick dressed up as Cupid or the 18 year old with a fucked up sense of what Love looks and feels like?

What a fucking cop out!

If you think that what I said was a word salad, you have reading comprehension issues. Like.. literally im speaking straight forward english..

...

Playing any of those roles does not change the fact that the relationship is not implicitly harmful. Again, for this reason your questions are irrelevant.

;

Whether or not I'm a 50 year old pervert with a 16 year old or a 25 year old with a 30 year old, none of these factors determine whether the relation is consensual or not.

The moral argument is literally

"I'm offended by this relationship therefore it should not exist"

How you subjectively feel does not justify dictating the behavior of others when they are not harming others. How you feel is irrelevant when the fact is that harm is not implicit.

It's actually about ethics in kiddies diddling

Forced sexual repression is oppression. You are using buzzwords in place of an arguement. Telling.

There is no evidence to suggest that consent between adults and teens is implicitly damaging or otherwise invalid.

I just turned 18 and I am glad I wasn't able to consent 2 years ago. I would have consented to any methhead std ridden 30 year old if I had the chance, I mean I still would but I would have done it 2 years ago too. If anything we should raise the age of consent.

Just because you were severely retarded when you were a certain age doesnt mean others can relate.

Your inability does not justify persecuting others for being capable

Most 15 year olds and younger are retarded. That's why we have laws protecting them. Do you think 14 year olds should be able to sign contracts too?

You're derailing.

Signing a legally binding contract is more complicated then consent.

Just because other teens are developmentally inferior does not justify persecuting higher functioning individuals.

Considering that "kid" "teen" "adult" "elder" etc are all subjectively defined, your statement is literally paradoxical.

Please refrain from logical failure.

It really depends in the kid, doesn't it my fellow liberalist?

Since there is nothing wrong with having consensual sex with teens who can consent, prosecution of people who do this isnt justified.

Moreover, its sexist since sexual attraction to teens is a gender norm of men, as it assumes the biology of men is flawed. The goal is to prosecute abusers, yet in actuality the law makes abusers synonymous with men.

Prioritizing women at the expense of disregarding men is sexist. Its straightforward logic.

> seriousposting this hard

So tell pedo, you are the big mad, aren't you?

In order to get mad over this, I would have to be losing an argument, as clearly that would trigger somebody with a mental disorder of this variation.

Since that hasn't happened, I dont know why youd assume I'm mad. People do not get mad about being successful lol

Is this a pasta? It should be

>Libertarian

>Kid fucker

Every time.