If you support free speech, you must support people pinging other users. It's completely legal speech. If you won't defend pinging as free speech because you or someone else finds it disgusting, then no speech that you or anyone else views as disgusting is safe.
if it is in fact on shaky legal ground it's reasonable to not want to be the case that establishes it as illegal.
It's not, The reddit admins are straight up lying to the ignorant (like yourself) to justify their prejudice. Pinging being protected speech has long since been estabilished, as it has undeniable artistic merit. The only time it's been included under any obscenity laws is when someone is being charged with possession of harassment, so the state can slap them with more charges. The courts have been very careful to not charge anyone for pinging, because they'd get their asses fucking annihilated by a higher court due to the firm precedence of pinging being completely legal speech. /r/Drama had nothing to worry about, this guy was just making shit up to fool people into thinking his censoring wasn't entirely personally motivated.
My son asked the man if he'd called his sister a 'whore' and a 'cunt.' The man admitted he had, and again become profane. My son threw a glass of red wine in the man's face
I did not assault this man, and neither did my son. That is a lie.
🤕🤕🤤🤤
no wonder this mong wore bowties for so long 👈👈👈 RETARD 😂😂
There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or "fighting" words those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. It has been well observed that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.
Now thank me for teaching you about this so you don't look like such a moron next time you give a hot take on this topic.
if u gonna seriouspost at least dont b a mong and show me where that lets u assault someone not just the police arresting or u just LARPing as a lawyercel? 🕵🕵
Also bow ties are unironically cool.
maybe to a manlet like urself bud but not this autist 👌😎👌
They're called "fighting words" because if someone, just as an off the top of my head random example, calls your daughter a "whore" and a "cunt," you're allowed to fight them because they provoked you with unprotected speech
maybe to a manlet like urself bud but not this autist
I hate your opinion, but god dammit I respect the way you said it.
fightin words allow police to arrest u. court ruled it doesnt violate free speech because dangerous situations it creates (sorta like "fire!" in a theater). not that ppl r just allowed to go assaulting whoever lmao 🤣🤣 who wud make a law ruling like that? thats the opposite of an orderly society (which the fightin words shit is supposedly tryin to protect)
do a quick google bud n quit LARPing as a (((lawyer))) 🤓🤓🤓
Fighting words are words intentionally directed toward another person which are so venomous and full of malice as to cause the hearer to suffer emotional distress or incite him/her to immediately retaliate physically. Fighting words are not an excuse or defense for a retaliatory assault and battery. However, if they are so threatening as to cause apprehension, they can form the basis for a lawsuit for assault, even though the words alone don't constitute an assault.
What about the "fighting words" argument? Aren't you allowed to defend yourself if someone verbally accosts, provokes or threatens you?
"That's perhaps the most common misconception about self-defense," says Schwartzbach.
Even though "fighting words" aren't protected as free speech, they're still not a legal justification for violence. Schwartzbach says that even if someone threatens you and says they're going to beat you up or kill you, the law doesn't give you the right to slug them.
"Now thank me for teaching you about this so you don't look like such a moron next time you give a hot take on this topic." 😘😘😘
I hate your opinion, but god dammit I respect the way you said it.
even if someone threatens you and says they're going to beat you up or kill you, the law doesn't give you the right to slug them.
This is just hilariously wrong. In most states if someone legitimately threatens to kill you or a family member, you can legally shoot them in the face on the spot. It's called the "imminent threat affirmative defense" iirc. E.g. "Yeah I shot that motherfucker right in his face, he lunged at me/my family member after shouting 'I'm literally going to kill you' so I feared for my/my family member's life"
Anyway there's not a single prosecutor in the nation who would bring charges against someone who threw a glass of wine (bitch move btw, goes without saying but I want to publicly cede you this ground to show I can have fun too) at someone who called their sister a "whore" and a "cunt"
Well maybe there's a handful that might in San Francisco or Seattle. But any reasonable prosecutor would laugh you out of their office
not LARPing 😤😤😤 thats 4 degenerate weebs and gaymers 👉👉 ☠☠☠
lmao i referred to the idea of limit of free speech for dangerous situations not tryin to cite case law like u bud (thats the LARP 🙄). miss me wit some article bout ppl being pro-censorship, rly think im bout that? 🤔🤔
This is just hilariously wrong.
i fucked up the quoting 😇😇 didnt want/need that line. but 4 the authors sake its not as retarded w/ the rest of it:
[...]
"It's one thing for it to be 'understandable' that someone threatens to kill you and you punch them in the face," says Schwartzbach. "But if there's no indication that the person was about to harm you in some way and you had time to go talk to the police, you're likely not going to have a legal defense."
Which brings up an important caveats when discussing the "legality" of anything. While criminal law regarding self-defense is pretty consistent across the United States, the enforcement and interpretation of the law varies state by state, precinct by precinct, and case by case.
Anyway there's not a single prosecutor in the nation who would bring charges against someone who threw a glass of wine
never said they wud, n they wont. most petty crimes arent worth prosecuting, still has nothing to do w/ "fighting words" law more "mitigating circumstances" type shit. unless u r talkin bout the redneck way o "dems fightin words boy😠😠😠". Low-T Tucker is still a mong for admiting assault n then saying he didnt 👌👌 faggot got cucked by an actual bussyboy n cudnt even square up 😂😂
This is just hilariously wrong. In most states if someone legitimately threatens to kill you or a family member, you can legally shoot them in the face on the spot. It's called the "imminent threat affirmative defense" iirc.
You definitely don’t recall correctly. That situation describes the Texas mattress shooting perfectly, and it didn’t matter that the victim shouted “I’m going to kill you” throwing a bat before he got shot, the people that shot him are still in prison. And that’s in fucking Texas. You’re legally allowed to attack people who insult you? You honestly think if someone calls you a dumb faggot you can hit them?
I can’t believe that between you and some emoji spewing retard you still manage to look more ignorant.
They're called "fighting words" because if someone, just as an off the top of my head random example, calls your daughter a "whore" and a "cunt," you're allowed to fight them
still doesnt mean the mong isnt completely wrong about wat the law on "fighting words" is. just came back online n unsuprisingly most of my fellow tards here dont either it seems 😅😅
'Get the fk out of here': Moment furious Tucker Carlson yells after his son threw wine over a gay Latino immigrant in a country club for 'calling the Fox News host's daughter a 'c*', as Michael Avenatti accuses the pundit of 'assault'
Hot take: only the daily mail, a tabloid, makes these kinds or headlines and the reason you feel all headlines look like this is because you get all your news through r/drama
I'm pro spectacle. If these people get harassed in public mayve magatards will harass Pelosi in public leading to a drama feedback that he rad center can devour
On a dramacoin level I agree with you. The protest was hilarious and I kind of hope it gets more out of hand. But as a real person, I feel bad for somebody whose teenage daughter gets harassed by some lispy Argentinian fruit because of their dad's job. I'm sure the millions of dollars make it more bearable, but that really tends to put a damper on family dynamics.
Idk man, when tucker goes straight savage on idiots he has in his show like the woman who wants to change everything with man in it, it’s quite entertaining
It's entertaining out of context, but after a couple of times he seems more like a bully waiting for a victim at the short bus stop than whatever champion of ideology his fans take him to be.
He follows a pretty predictable template of finding a somebody less articulate, intelligent, or level-headed than him who he disagrees with, baiting them with bad-faith questions until they contradict themselves or sperg out, and then vivisecting them, claiming a victory, and presenting the whole exercise as evidence that the opposing viewpoint is retarded. And sometimes it is retarded, but sometimes it's just a non-Tucker-approved stance.
So yes, while watching him fuck with the commie giraffe is funny, his schtick gets really old really fast.
I can't stand those either, but I had a roommate who watched Tucker Carlson almost daily and now I have a special distaste for him and his patented Tucker Face.
There really isn't. John Oliver beats up such imaginary straw men and makes his viewers think they're such intellectuals because they know what Yemen is.
This is the simple math I can see: Tucker is on the side of evil
I'm not saying that someone should do this, but if people are stopping the Tuckers from talking, it could make America great
You could even say the choice of NOT harassing Tucker and other evil people like him, makes someone completely responsible for their words and the evil they do
So I can see why it is happening. Makes moral sense for the good people like harassers, to stop evil people like Tucker or other Republicans
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing. Imagine all of the lives that this Tucker has destroyed in his support of Republicans, with a propaganda show
I can see why the good men and women are trying to silence his words with aggressive force, like those fighting against the Nazis would have
Tucker fights for truth, liberty and the American way. He speaks nothing but the unfettered honest truth and his journalistic ability to destroy propagandists is second to none. You are a puppet of the globalist elite whose only interest in cattle like you is as a source of division and control.
Yeah, idk why there's no much drama around this guy. He's tame af and pretty moderate for a conservative TV pundit.
I think certain pockets of the left has self-radicalized to the extent that they truly believe everything to the right of anarcho-communism is fascism.
Right? Like I qualify as "far left" on the American scale and Tucker Carlson is a complete piece of shit but I'm 100% on his side on this one. GOOD job being worse than Tucker fucking Carlson, ya psychos.
Get the f**k out of here': Moment furious Tucker Carlson yells after his son threw wine over a gay Latino immigrant in a country club for 'calling the Fox News
Sounds more like he was angry that a Mexican was allowed into the club.
Yo, Yankies, the Daily Mail is seen by many as the fucking gutter of the tabloids and only really bought by fuck wits who want to hate immigrants. Just go and read the comments, you can see the level of the average reader by how fucking retarded they sound. At least quote something like the Sun, you get a bonus by pissing off the scouses.
101 comments
1 BussyShillBot 2018-11-11
That entire subreddit is a cesspool. It's like a sewer that empties directly into a stagnant pond.
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 SnapshillBot 2018-11-11
If you support free speech, you must support people pinging other users. It's completely legal speech. If you won't defend pinging as free speech because you or someone else finds it disgusting, then no speech that you or anyone else views as disgusting is safe.
It's not, The reddit admins are straight up lying to the ignorant (like yourself) to justify their prejudice. Pinging being protected speech has long since been estabilished, as it has undeniable artistic merit. The only time it's been included under any obscenity laws is when someone is being charged with possession of harassment, so the state can slap them with more charges. The courts have been very careful to not charge anyone for pinging, because they'd get their asses fucking annihilated by a higher court due to the firm precedence of pinging being completely legal speech. /r/Drama had nothing to worry about, this guy was just making shit up to fool people into thinking his censoring wasn't entirely personally motivated.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 LemonScore_ 2018-11-11
(((/u/spez))) doesn't support free speech, his tribe hates the goyimz and their constitution.
1 HungerArtistatlunch 2018-11-11
Avenatti is the best thing Fox News could've ever hoped for. The man takes bait like no other.
1 Oh_hamburgers_ 2018-11-11
I really hope he runs in 2020
1 HungerArtistatlunch 2018-11-11
We would reach 2016 levels of drama.
1 mrv3 2018-11-11
Avenatti for Hillary VP pick.
1 LemonScore_ 2018-11-11
He is a white male, so the Dems had better run him!
1 uniqueguy263 2018-11-11
As a Democrat, pls no. God no
1 Dildokin 2018-11-11
Why not? It would be great for the dramacoin
1 dramasexual 2018-11-11
A GAY LATINO IMMIGRANT
as if that matters lmfao. playing that idpol like a drum.
1 OniTan 2018-11-11
Can't wait to see Tucker hauled away in handcuffs. #LockHimUp
1 dratamard2 2018-11-11
🤕🤕🤤🤤
no wonder this mong wore bowties for so long 👈👈👈 RETARD 😂😂
1 I_Dream_of_Outremer 2018-11-11
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaplinsky_v._New_Hampshire
Now thank me for teaching you about this so you don't look like such a moron next time you give a hot take on this topic.
Also bow ties are unironically cool.
1 dratamard2 2018-11-11
👆👆👆 lmao @ this faggot 😂😂😂
>entire article about 1st amendment protection
if u gonna seriouspost at least dont b a mong and show me where that lets u assault someone not just the police arresting or u just LARPing as a lawyercel? 🕵🕵
maybe to a manlet like urself bud but not this autist 👌😎👌
1 I_Dream_of_Outremer 2018-11-11
They're called "fighting words" because if someone, just as an off the top of my head random example, calls your daughter a "whore" and a "cunt," you're allowed to fight them because they provoked you with unprotected speech
I hate your opinion, but god dammit I respect the way you said it.
1 dratamard2 2018-11-11
some1 didnt read their own article 😂😂😂
fightin words allow police to arrest u. court ruled it doesnt violate free speech because dangerous situations it creates (sorta like "fire!" in a theater). not that ppl r just allowed to go assaulting whoever lmao 🤣🤣 who wud make a law ruling like that? thats the opposite of an orderly society (which the fightin words shit is supposedly tryin to protect)
do a quick google bud n quit LARPing as a (((lawyer))) 🤓🤓🤓
"Now thank me for teaching you about this so you don't look like such a moron next time you give a hot take on this topic." 😘😘😘
aww ty bud 🤗🤗🤗
1 LongPostBot 2018-11-11
That degree finally paying off
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 dratamard2 2018-11-11
u/LightUmbra when u gonna fix ur bot buddy and make it ignore > quotes 😤😤😤
luv ya 😍😍
1 LightUmbra 2018-11-11
Never. Way to much work
1 SJCards 2018-11-11
B a s e d lazy bot owner.
1 I_Dream_of_Outremer 2018-11-11
Well look who's LARPing now, at least you seem to be having fun with it. https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/11/its-time-to-stop-using-the-fire-in-a-crowded-theater-quote/264449/
No comment.
This is just hilariously wrong. In most states if someone legitimately threatens to kill you or a family member, you can legally shoot them in the face on the spot. It's called the "imminent threat affirmative defense" iirc. E.g. "Yeah I shot that motherfucker right in his face, he lunged at me/my family member after shouting 'I'm literally going to kill you' so I feared for my/my family member's life"
Anyway there's not a single prosecutor in the nation who would bring charges against someone who threw a glass of wine (bitch move btw, goes without saying but I want to publicly cede you this ground to show I can have fun too) at someone who called their sister a "whore" and a "cunt"
Well maybe there's a handful that might in San Francisco or Seattle. But any reasonable prosecutor would laugh you out of their office
1 LongPostBot 2018-11-11
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/038/094/0a1.jpg
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 I_Dream_of_Outremer 2018-11-11
I deserved that. Proportionate and fair. Thanks bot
1 dratamard2 2018-11-11
not LARPing 😤😤😤 thats 4 degenerate weebs and gaymers 👉👉 ☠☠☠
lmao i referred to the idea of limit of free speech for dangerous situations not tryin to cite case law like u bud (thats the LARP 🙄). miss me wit some article bout ppl being pro-censorship, rly think im bout that? 🤔🤔
i fucked up the quoting 😇😇 didnt want/need that line. but 4 the authors sake its not as retarded w/ the rest of it:
never said they wud, n they wont. most petty crimes arent worth prosecuting, still has nothing to do w/ "fighting words" law more "mitigating circumstances" type shit. unless u r talkin bout the redneck way o "dems fightin words boy😠😠😠". Low-T Tucker is still a mong for admiting assault n then saying he didnt 👌👌 faggot got cucked by an actual bussyboy n cudnt even square up 😂😂
1 LongPostBot 2018-11-11
Good job bobby, here's a star
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 SlackBabo 2018-11-11
You definitely don’t recall correctly. That situation describes the Texas mattress shooting perfectly, and it didn’t matter that the victim shouted “I’m going to kill you” throwing a bat before he got shot, the people that shot him are still in prison. And that’s in fucking Texas. You’re legally allowed to attack people who insult you? You honestly think if someone calls you a dumb faggot you can hit them?
I can’t believe that between you and some emoji spewing retard you still manage to look more ignorant.
1 ComedicSans 2018-11-11
You're literally retarded 😂 😂 😂
1 I_Dream_of_Outremer 2018-11-11
No u
1 OniTan 2018-11-11
Your mom's a real cunt.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-11-11
Wine in the face is protected speech.
1 Dildokin 2018-11-11
Its misogynist to say it’s not
1 zergling_Lester 2018-11-11
Homophobic too. And transphobic of course.
1 dratamard2 2018-11-11
lmao gussy gunna gussy 🤷♂️🤷♂️
still doesnt mean the mong isnt completely wrong about wat the law on "fighting words" is. just came back online n unsuprisingly most of my fellow tards here dont either it seems 😅😅
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-11-11
Fighting words doctrine doesn't work as an affirmative defense anymore, nerd
1 none_to_remain 2018-11-11
Ladies and gentlemen, this is the headline.
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2018-11-11
This is why the First Amendment should be repealed.
1 lascanto 2018-11-11
The brits don’t have a first amendment you dingus
1 Boks1 2018-11-11
Then I guess we're all safe.
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2018-11-11
Exactly why it needs to be repealed. USA needs to catch up with the rest of the world.
1 FashyGoyy 2018-11-11
Commies get out
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2018-11-11
I'm not the unwanted migrant here, I belong inside these borders.
#buildthatwall
1 Snowayne2 2018-11-11
Why does every journalist in the anglosphere sound like a 14 year-old girl gossiping in a whatsapp group chat?
1 Ace4929 2018-11-11
They basically are
1 OnicoBoy94 2018-11-11
Hot take: only the daily mail, a tabloid, makes these kinds or headlines and the reason you feel all headlines look like this is because you get all your news through r/drama
1 Snowayne2 2018-11-11
Of course an angry ameritard shows up to defens the shit they call news 🙄
1 OnicoBoy94 2018-11-11
The daily mail is british you mong. And eww yuck 🤢🤢🤢 I'm not american
1 Ace4929 2018-11-11
/r/titlegore
1 VidiotGamer 2018-11-11
Gotta hand it to the left in America these days, doing a great job of making me feel sympathetic to a smarmy douchebag like Tucker Carlson.
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2018-11-11
I, too, side with those who assault any person who says something I don't like. Free speech is a pox on America
I mean this all unironically
1 Mexagon 2018-11-11
Oh now you fags are ready to broaden the definition of assault.
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2018-11-11
🤯
1 thedeevolution 2018-11-11
Yeah, cause MAGAcels don’t scream assault every time a stiff breeze knocks their red hat of retardation in the mud.
1 TrailerParkBride 2018-11-11
Im with you. Tucker is a smug, intellectually dishonest cunt with a persecution complex, but I've been feeling genuinely bad for him this week.
1 wayback000 2018-11-11
Fuck you fag
1 TrailerParkBride 2018-11-11
Sick burn, retard
1 Automaticus 2018-11-11
I'm pro spectacle. If these people get harassed in public mayve magatards will harass Pelosi in public leading to a drama feedback that he rad center can devour
1 TrailerParkBride 2018-11-11
On a dramacoin level I agree with you. The protest was hilarious and I kind of hope it gets more out of hand. But as a real person, I feel bad for somebody whose teenage daughter gets harassed by some lispy Argentinian fruit because of their dad's job. I'm sure the millions of dollars make it more bearable, but that really tends to put a damper on family dynamics.
1 Harbinger147 2018-11-11
Idk man, when tucker goes straight savage on idiots he has in his show like the woman who wants to change everything with man in it, it’s quite entertaining
1 Strictlybutters 2018-11-11
It’s like making fun of actual retards tho, which is only fun if you’re being (somewhat) ironic and tucker isn’t.
1 TrailerParkBride 2018-11-11
It's entertaining out of context, but after a couple of times he seems more like a bully waiting for a victim at the short bus stop than whatever champion of ideology his fans take him to be.
He follows a pretty predictable template of finding a somebody less articulate, intelligent, or level-headed than him who he disagrees with, baiting them with bad-faith questions until they contradict themselves or sperg out, and then vivisecting them, claiming a victory, and presenting the whole exercise as evidence that the opposing viewpoint is retarded. And sometimes it is retarded, but sometimes it's just a non-Tucker-approved stance.
So yes, while watching him fuck with the commie giraffe is funny, his schtick gets really old really fast.
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2018-11-11
What's the difference between this shtick and the daily show/Colbert report/whatever Jim Jeffries show is interviewing and mocking retards?
1 Harbinger147 2018-11-11
Out of curiosity, have you been banned from any subs just because of your name? I feel like r/politics has a field day with you when you post in their
1 TrailerParkBride 2018-11-11
I can't stand those either, but I had a roommate who watched Tucker Carlson almost daily and now I have a special distaste for him and his patented Tucker Face.
1 rnjbond 2018-11-11
There really isn't. John Oliver beats up such imaginary straw men and makes his viewers think they're such intellectuals because they know what Yemen is.
1 nanonan 2018-11-11
Tuckers targets aren't bottom of the barrel morons all the time.
1 ConfuseTheJews 2018-11-11
This is the simple math I can see: Tucker is on the side of evil
I'm not saying that someone should do this, but if people are stopping the Tuckers from talking, it could make America great
You could even say the choice of NOT harassing Tucker and other evil people like him, makes someone completely responsible for their words and the evil they do
So I can see why it is happening. Makes moral sense for the good people like harassers, to stop evil people like Tucker or other Republicans
1 Anus_of_Aeneas 2018-11-11
Either you are a troll or retarded. If you notmaliz bad tactics, bad tactics will be used against you.
1 ConfuseTheJews 2018-11-11
With that attitude, Hitler and the Nazis would have just conquered Europe, like Tucker and the fascists are conquering America
Only a true fascist or a coward would oppose bashing the fash
1 nanonan 2018-11-11
Tucker Carlson and fascist in the same breath. You're a fucking retard.
1 ConfuseTheJews 2018-11-11
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing. Imagine all of the lives that this Tucker has destroyed in his support of Republicans, with a propaganda show
I can see why the good men and women are trying to silence his words with aggressive force, like those fighting against the Nazis would have
1 nanonan 2018-11-11
Tucker fights for truth, liberty and the American way. He speaks nothing but the unfettered honest truth and his journalistic ability to destroy propagandists is second to none. You are a puppet of the globalist elite whose only interest in cattle like you is as a source of division and control.
1 ConfuseTheJews 2018-11-11
Puppet is such harsh word. Employee of the month is preferable please
1 nanonan 2018-11-11
Is it still a persecution complex when they surround your house and tell you to git outta town?
1 nomad1c 2018-11-11
he's like the least controversial conservative pundit out there. targeting him is beyond dumb
1 Anarcho_Autism 2018-11-11
Yeah, idk why there's no much drama around this guy. He's tame af and pretty moderate for a conservative TV pundit.
I think certain pockets of the left has self-radicalized to the extent that they truly believe everything to the right of anarcho-communism is fascism.
1 nanonan 2018-11-11
If they were merely isolated little pockets they wouldn't turn up literally everywhere including this very thread.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2018-11-11
That's just because youre also huge pussy
1 dramasexual 2018-11-11
Right? Like I qualify as "far left" on the American scale and Tucker Carlson is a complete piece of shit but I'm 100% on his side on this one. GOOD job being worse than Tucker fucking Carlson, ya psychos.
1 Feanorfanclub 2018-11-11
Splashing wine is assault now what a fucking world. Using this metric are women assaulting creepy dudes at bars when they toss their drink at them?
1 ComedicSans 2018-11-11
It always has been.
1 VidiotGamer 2018-11-11
Only civil, not criminal. You'd also have to prove damages, so maybe he could sue Tucker's son for a dry cleaning bill.
1 dramasexual 2018-11-11
that's not... no. That's not how that works at all.
1 VidiotGamer 2018-11-11
Yeah, it is.
Touching someone against their will = assault.
Touching someone against their will that violates criminal law = criminal assault.
Splashing wine on someone isn't criminal assault in most states. but like I mentioned, you may still be liable for dry cleaning bills.
1 Feanorfanclub 2018-11-11
He will survive these grueling tribulations, somehow
1 nanonan 2018-11-11
Just like calling people a cunt is fighting words.
1 ComedicSans 2018-11-11
Lmfao, "fighting words" isn't a legal excuse to allow you to fight someone, it's a justified limitation on the First Amendment.
1 telandrias 2018-11-11
Assaulting misogynists isnt a crime either
1 KBSuks 2018-11-11
Sounds more like he was angry that a Mexican was allowed into the club.
1 Penguinproof1 2018-11-11
That seems a bit stronger
1 meatpuppet79 2018-11-11
That delightful bean scented fellow definitely changed Carlson's mind regarding Mexicans for the better!
1 SkipperPauline 2018-11-11
Yo, Yankies, the Daily Mail is seen by many as the fucking gutter of the tabloids and only really bought by fuck wits who want to hate immigrants. Just go and read the comments, you can see the level of the average reader by how fucking retarded they sound. At least quote something like the Sun, you get a bonus by pissing off the scouses.
1 Vercingetorixxx 2018-11-11
Educated people like me only read approved, reliable news sources like BBC.
https://www.bbc.com/pidgin/tori-41171196
1 Anus_of_Aeneas 2018-11-11
Holy shit
1 Sea_Safe 2018-11-11
oogabooga we IZ kangz
1 dz0id 2018-11-11
I don’t care how many articles about tucker Carlson you post to try to gain sympathy for him, he’s still a bitch ass faggot who I wish only the worst
1 ugongitbuttraped 2018-11-11
poor baby
you seem sad
😕
1 dz0id 2018-11-11
I’m posting in drama, obviously I’m a sad loser. This doesn’t change the fact that Tucker Carlson sucks ass
1 mukumukum12 2018-11-11
They should get Mueller on this now that he's got a bunch of free time.
1 Kat_B0T 2018-11-11
CPL has it out for the DDF, big league!
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2018-11-11
ORANGE FANS MAD!!!!