It's not denying science, it's questioning whether the model has been applied correctly. Which based on it getting literally fuck all correct so far, is highly fucking likely.
If there was any concern that everyone would die we wouldn't be making deals where China increase their emissions by 40%,
There is a lot of fucking concern from scientists, but idiots and oil producers have been spreading misinformation for years about the risks. The climate is fragile, once we "break it" it will snowball (no pun intended) out of control and cause a collapse of human civilization. It might already be too late.
Here is some evidence that climate science has UNDERESTIMATED THE IMPACTS, if anything climate scientists have been wayyy to conservative in their reports and models.
I don't get how people fall for Peterson's shtick. All he does is claim he is going to get shutdown and lose his job as a professor...and he never does.
He makes gobs and gobs of money, for rambling on and on and never actually saying anything of substance.
At this point it would probably be more profitable for him to quit his job, claim he was fired, and make everything on Patron fulltime. At least he wouldn't be a stain on UT anymore.
I'm sure it will be pretty bad like 300 years from now, but imagine the state of the world by that point and ask yourself if you really care about the future of the global chinese islamic caliphate.
19 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-11-12
If you find yourself comparing politics to sex you should neck yourself, because you're clearly doing both wrong.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 mydramaaccount 2018-11-12
Oh no guys we might be in danger of making the planet's air a little too fresh!!!
Foreskin Eaterson fuccbois are so god damn dumb.
1 BriefSquirt 2018-11-12
Preach brother
1 JilaX 2018-11-12
More like "In danger of permanently damaging The West's economy to the point where China engulfs the world".
1 cryptonewsguy 2018-11-12
lmao
Yeah because there's no other way to have a good economy other than to deny science.
Guess what fucker? There will be no economy if everyone is fucking dead.
1 JilaX 2018-11-12
It's not denying science, it's questioning whether the model has been applied correctly. Which based on it getting literally fuck all correct so far, is highly fucking likely.
1 cryptonewsguy 2018-11-12
Climate models have been systemically under estimating economic damages for decades. They have been underestimating! Not OVER! http://www.digitaljournal.com/tech-and-science/science/economic-damages-from-climate-change-have-been-underestimated/article/529607
There is a lot of fucking concern from scientists, but idiots and oil producers have been spreading misinformation for years about the risks. The climate is fragile, once we "break it" it will snowball (no pun intended) out of control and cause a collapse of human civilization. It might already be too late.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExxonMobil_climate_change_controversy
1 JilaX 2018-11-12
LOL, economic damages by 2100 might have been underestimated.
Are you fucking dense, or are you just that desperate to not admit it when you're talking out of your ass?
Climate models have absolutely been wrong. They've wildly overshot, and we're nowhere near the trajectory laid out ten years ago.
Blame the oil industry for the deal Obama and the rest of the G8 made, makes perfect sense.
1 cryptonewsguy 2018-11-12
Provide evidence that mainstream climate science has over shoot. You are full of shit and just parroting climate denialist propaganda.
Obama probably didn't do enough to fight climate change, same with almost all presidents. This isn't a left v right issue. This is fucking science.
Here is some evidence you should look at before blindly believing hearsay and climate change denialists:
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/climate-change-evidence-causes/basics-of-climate-change/
https://www.mfe.govt.nz/climate-change/why-climate-change-matters/evidence-climate-change
Here is some evidence that climate science has UNDERESTIMATED THE IMPACTS, if anything climate scientists have been wayyy to conservative in their reports and models.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/environment/climate-change-effects-to-be-far-worse-than-previously-thought-1.3655328
https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/climate-change-even-worse-we-thought-ipcc-report
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/10/un-says-climate-genocide-coming-but-its-worse-than-that.html
I agree, that climate science models are not nearly as accurate as they say, but the errors lead to over optimism not over pessimism.
1 LongPostBot 2018-11-12
That degree finally paying off
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 BannedByFordShills 2018-11-12
lol look at this liebrual soyboy cuck NPC with his "facts" and "evidence"
1 BriefSquirt 2018-11-12
Yet another reason we should rise above this fascist gasbag and his quietescent possê of inculpable cumstain 'followers'.
Global warming in our time.
1 JustStopDude 2018-11-12
I don't get how people fall for Peterson's shtick. All he does is claim he is going to get shutdown and lose his job as a professor...and he never does.
He makes gobs and gobs of money, for rambling on and on and never actually saying anything of substance.
1 aX10mAt1CaL1Y 2018-11-12
At this point it would probably be more profitable for him to quit his job, claim he was fired, and make everything on Patron fulltime. At least he wouldn't be a stain on UT anymore.
1 KBSuks 2018-11-12
I feel like I’m in the minority of people who don’t think global warming is that bad but hope that it will be.
1 Moist_Daddies 2018-11-12
OK hitler!
1 KBSuks 2018-11-12
You’re too kind
1 OnePercentOfMonster 2018-11-12
I'm sure it will be pretty bad like 300 years from now, but imagine the state of the world by that point and ask yourself if you really care about the future of the global chinese islamic caliphate.
1 carnivoreinyeg 2018-11-12
Triggered into oblivion. Well done OP