You didn't even read it, did you? You just disregarded it because it doesn't fit your world view. You are pathetic, scum of the earth. People present you with scientifically backed evidence showing how the world really is and you disregard it because it is brought to your attention by a group of people you find inferior to you.

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

Tough but fair in order to make America great

Galaxy brained congressman

I think he’s onto something. We all say we want mayoside, but this guy has rightly figured out that what America really needs is a good nuking. It’s the only way to bring back the sanity. So if the Chinese and Russians aren’t man enough to do it, it has to be America’s own government.

What's better: Wishing your country would get nuked to own the libs on the coast, or nuking yourself to own the cons?

I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities.

Nuking your own country to protect families and communities - that's a next level move right there. What a brilliant man.

Nuke American cities to get guns and own the cons epic style Every other country in the world shits on the U.S. [Chinese and Russian commies invade as a "peacekeeping force"(#gt)

200 IQ Congressman right here.

Nuke the cities? Won't even hit that many guns tbh

Lol at thinking there aren't guns in cities. People aren't getting murdered in cities from fist fights.

It's the countryside that stockpiles guns religiously

oh no the innocent hi points

Nukes would have ended the civil war in a day. CMV

Ltrly not an argument.

If the explosions didn't destroy the Confederacy, the hulked-out former slaves would have.

Django 2: The Reckoning

Sherman could have finished the job right

nobody wants to nuke their own country though weirdly enough

unless its nevada then lol who cares

The nuclear fallout may make the survivors into mutant super soldiers.

yeah but you're losing half of the country anyways

What did he mean by this?

It's uhhhh....sarcasm be says

I'm no expert but I don't think that's how sarcasm works.

Basically the argument that having an AR-15 is to help protect you from a tyrannical government is somewhat moot when the government can kill you from 30,000 feet.

In the history of the Russian revolution Trotsky said something about forcing soldiers to gain sympathy for the cause by the sheer magnitude of people they were forced to kill. So, in theory, to curve civilian casualties and bolster morale, an AR-15 would be useful. Let’s not negate the 2nd amendment and what the founding fathers foresaw in the risk of tyrannical government. But let’s also not forget that this is r/drama faggot and I obviously knew what this dumbasss meant. Never seriouspost to me again.

Let’s not negate the 2nd amendment and what the founding fathers foresaw with the risk of tyrannical government.

They did? I thought they said something about a "well regulated militia" (which I hear the correct interpretation of is "one that works well" not "one where you have to follow a lot of annoying rules"). Surely if men as wise as this had actually meant "The ability of discontented citizens to overthrow an unjust government by force of arms being essential to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" they'd have said so.

The Supreme Court disagrees with you. The Bill of Rights were all exclusively INDIVIDUAL rights.

I'm not sure that the 2nd Amendment says anything about what the founding fathers foresaw with the risk of tyrannical government, which is all I was commenting on. If they'd intended anything about the risk of tyrannical government and the right of the people to arm themselves against one, I kinda feel it would not have been beyond the wit of man to have, you know, said so. Still, I'd be the last to call myself an expert on this.

It is individual rights and always has been. There is absolutely no reason to jump to the conclusion that one on the list doesn't apply towards giving rights to individuals. The only reason to view it as such is to spout off some loophole in order to effectively ban the amendment.

lol. Scared someone's going to take your guns away? Don't worry, I'm not about to even if I could. Statistically the most likely person for you to shoot with them is yourself, and I can't possibly see that as a bad thing.

Proving stupid statements wrong doesn't make a person scared. Drama is filled with retards. The idea that they are people to be feared is comical.

Why are you standing there yelling at a mirror?

next time just don't respond

no u

shit you got me

It happens. Beer?

You can’t have a militia without people owning guns you mouth breather. Also it isn’t meant to overthrow the government, but to preserve your rights from an overreaching government. Not the same thing at all.

Stop serious posting on my r/drama subreddit

I only breathe through my mouth when I'm banging ur mom. Can't nose-breathe them on account of the godawful stench.

damn you roasted me so hard I don’t know how I’ll ever recover. But also ur gay for banging gussy you uncultured swine

no u

W

yikes, imagine being this bad at interpreting the 2nd

Assuming it'll even get to nukes before these people are declared domestic terrorist and their own buddies disown them for instigating political violence because it makes their side look bad, or even call them (((deep state))) plants.

No one calls the magabomber or baseball shooter revolutionary for standing against what they believe to be tyrannical governments, they'll be labelled nutjobs and Seth riched.

No one calls the magabomber or baseball shooter revolutionary for standing against what they believe to be tyrannical governments, they'll be labelled nutjobs

The baseball shooter is already a martyr to chapotards

thus proving my point

its dumb though because the government wants to control people not kill everyone

if they nuke an area then all they have to rule over is an irradiated hole

its why afghanistan and iraq were such a cunt for america, they cant just destroy them or theyll have nothing to rebuild and no puppets to do what they want

[removed]

I love how he talks about finding common ground right after talking about nuking America

Alameda County Jail needs to pick him up. That's a terrorist threat against millions of people simply using their 2nd Amendment rights.

Alameda County=Retards

This but unironically.

So our congressman are as stupid as the regular population. What else is new.

Eric "Slag every Gadsden Flag" Swalwell

Eric "If they hate, irradiate" Swalwell

Eric "Guns aren't toys, here's two Little Boys" Swalwell

Eric "Bill of Rights means you glow at night" Swalwell

Third one's best.

Eric "Guns aren't toys, here's two Little Boys" Swalwell

Eric "Guns aren't toys, here's two Little Boys" Swalwell

Wtf I love Democrats now

i mean hes not really but its fun to pretend so he looks like a crazy person

why are you of all people defending the left

The proper solution is to nuke America with no concern given to whether they give up their guns. Give depopulation a chance, people.

Anyone who says "my friend" is mentally challenged.