Jews rejected republicans more on midterms than muslims. Fucking muslims are more ourguys than jews! Can you believe that? All the cucking and ass kissing Trump has done for the long nose tribe and that's how they thank him lmao. Embarrassing.
Trumplistilskin isn't a politician. He doesn't know how to play the game so he believed that kowtowing to Israeli issues and other groups will get him what he wants.
All that happens is they get what they want, he gets laughed at by them and called a shill by people who actually believed he was competent.
Man in retrospect, our election was terrible but hilarious.
We rather have a know nothing as president over the senator who helped wreck NYC as president.
This is the most retarded take I've seen from you in ages.
Nah, they may be socially conservative but that's overpowered with their desire for gibs.
So why did they consistently vote republican before 9/11? Was the republican party big on welfare up until that point?
conservatism is for mayos
Are you actually retarded? Most muslim and non-white countries are extremely conservative, both economically and socially. Also why do you ignore the fact that most of the prominent leftist thinkers and leaders were european?
Most muslim and non-white countries are extremely conservative
This is why I'm looking forward to America becoming majority-minority, seeing how white liberals react when the browns become big enough to vote in their own turbo conservative parties is the stuff of wet dreams
No, I think a lot of mirotity groups are now being lead by you guys people who only saw the conservative hatred for them turning their groups towards liberalism for the future.
Most Muslim countries aren't right economically, atleast in terms of welfare. The rich gulf states literally give out free money to all their citizens so they can keep their monarchy, poorer ones like Egypt and Pakistan are dominated with government owned corporations, tariffs and your usual overbearing regulations.
The rich gulf states literally give out free money to all their citizens
I am well aware of that because i grew up in one of those states. That being said, most muslim countries are not rich gulf monarchies.
so they can keep their monarchies
Monarchies are also inherintly not left wing. Even the gulf states we were talking about are infested with capitalism in all its forms. Some like saudi arabia are even decreasing their social programs due to the oil issue.
poorer ones like Egypt and Pakistan are dominated with government owned corporations
This is a) over exagerated and b) does not make them very leftist
People assume “government owned” is the left wing alternative when actually it’s “worker owned” that were looking for. Another of those leftovers the Soviets left us with unfortunately.
Progress how? How could it ever be implemented? We already have progress, and Communists jerk off to insulting them calling them succdems in between murder fantasies.
Take them, they are fat and sloppy and not hairy enough for this twinkly twink.
Still didn’t answer the question. If this is becauseyou are some sort of army brat that occasionally got your fat pimply ass dragged into downtown Doha for a shitty Jasmine burger, spare me your incisive “knowledge” on the land of Allah.
They aren't economically right though which is my point. Having as big a welfare state as them is not economically right.
Pakistan and Egypt have military run corporations not paying rent, electricity bill or taxes to the point private businesses can't compete with them. If a foreign company still manages to outcompete them, they just ban imports of that product. Pretty big problem imo.
What about the huge tariffs and crazy amount of regulations? Are those economically right too?
Having as big a welfare state as them is not economically right
Yes, and most Muslim countries do not have big welfare states, we've been over this.
Pakistan and Egypt have military run corporations not paying rent, electricity bill or taxes
Scale is important here. Having government run corporation doesn't make you a left wing government.
What about the huge tariffs and crazy amount of regulations? Are those economically right too?
Again, those are within the scope of capitalism. Do you think the US government is actually economically leftist because it enforces regulations and has been trending more protectionist?
Yes, and most Muslim countries do not have big welfare states, we've been over this.
The reason they don't is because they're poor. Barely any poor country has a welfare state. You can only compare rich muslim countries with rich western countries when talking about welfare state.
Again, those are within the scope of capitalism. Do you think the US government is actually economically leftist because it enforces regulations and has been trending more protectionist?
Are all capitalist countries economically right then? Ofcourse it's within the scope of capitalism, the only thing within the scope of communism is your own head so you can shoot yourself and end the misery.
I am using regular people scale, not mentally ill people ones. More free trade = more right economically, more welfare= more left economically. Free trade with no welfare= far right economically, very restricted trade and lots of welfare (like Cuba) = far left economically. Most countries are in the middle.
The reason they don't is because they're poor. Barely any poor country has a welfare state. You can only compare rich muslim countries with rich western countries when talking about welfare state.
Ah no... you can be poor and have social services, there are leftist countries which are still poor. But even if we go by your logic, the rich gulf states are by no means leftist, both socially and economically.
Are all capitalist countries economically right then? Ofcourse it's within the scope of capitalism, the only thing within the scope of communism is your own head so you can shoot yourself and end the misery.
You responded to my question with another question without answering it. Again, is the US economically leftist according to you?
Also not all capitalist governments are right wing, my point is protectionism and regulations doesn't make a country left wing. Work on your reading ability.
I am using regular people scale, not mentally ill people's scales. More free trade = more right economically, more welfare= more left economically. Free trade with no welfare= far right economically, very restricted trade and lots of welfare (like Cuba) = far left economically. Most countries are in the middle.
I think you're misunderstanding the point of that "free money."
The royal families just hand out cash so the population doesn't revolt against them. They're some of the most socially conservative countries on earth, they're ultra conservative even.
The rich gulf states literally give out free money to all their citizens so they can keep their monarchy,
I mentioned that. It's free money for the citizens who don't do any work though. The government brings in foreigners to do all the work, takes most of the profit for the royal family and gives some of it to the citizens so they shut up and don't ask for a democracy.
Every country uses it's resources to try to gain wealth. You just stated their governments are handing them out free cash, and that is robbery. You wanna give most the money to Mo Goat Herder and let him make multi-national deals? You actually make more sense when you are just angry sperging against women.
They are throwing enough cash at the people to keep them happy. You can't do that when you are poor. Go back to r/cth and muse about how the world would be better if the janitors controlled the wealth.
They're literally using the entire natural wealth of the country for their own personal enrichment.
They're then throwing a trivial amount back at the plebes to placate them. Let me explain this in even a way your low IQ rightoid brain can understand.
Let's say you're the head of a tribe, your tribe holds dominion over a large swathe of land. You inherited the leadership role of this tribe, you weren't elected, you didn't do anything other than be born.
You then exploit this land for your own personal wealth, you take 98% of the revenue from the forests, the lakes, the ground. You then throw 2% back at the plebes. Is this robbery?
Yeah, we get it. Mayos promising people free shit in America and Europe is good to get support for leaders. Brown people doing the same in their countries equals robbery. I get your point.
This post brought to you by your local dairy farmer. Do you settle for 2% milk when there are trillions of cows?
The fact you think a western democracy using tax income from the population to maintain a social safety net is the same as a monarchy hoarding the wealth of an entire country for themselves says everything that needs to be said.
You just aren't smart enough to have this discussion.
You literally just tried to claim a western democracy using tax income to fund social safety nets, social safety nets voted on by the population, is on equal footing with a monarchy hoarding the natural resources of an entire country for personal enrichment.
The idea you think I'm the lolcow here, or that I'm the retard is just staggering. The simple fact you thought the argument you tried to use was a good one is just ironclad proof of a cognitive problem.
Yes because the right wing in those countries tends to be anti muslim specifically, much like the republican party post 9/11.
I can't find any results for Sweden, Netherlands etc, but it's a widely-known phenomenon that they vote left in Europe and vote right when still eligible to do so in their country of origin.
Yes... Meaning the majority of Muslims worldwide are right wing both economically and socially. Maybe next time you should actually read my comment
Yes because the right wing in those countries tends to be anti muslim specifically, much like the republican party post 9/11.
So the future of democracy is who can bend over the furthest for minorities? Surely very conducive to success.
Yes... Meaning the majority of Muslims worldwide are right wing both economically and socially. Maybe next time you should actually read my comment
Yet in practice they'll vote for whoever will appease them the most. Also they use welfare at a hugely disproportionate rate in the UK and Germany, so you're completely misguided if you think they'd vote to reduce it.
So the future of democracy is who can bend over the furthest for minorities? Surely very conducive to success.
If you have two parties and one of them explicitly hates you for your ethnic or religious beliefs than you'll probably vote for the other one, it isn't that hard to understand.
Democracy is very flawed thought so I'm not interested in defending it.
Yet in practice they'll vote for whoever will appease them the most. Also they use welfare at a hugely disproportionate rate in the UK and Germany, so you're completely misguided if you think they'd vote to reduce it.
No shit? My original comment was about the united states where the Muslim population is significantly richer than its European counterparts.
The Conservative party does not hate Muslims. You're making the mistake of extrapolating from the Republicans to draw conclusions about all other right-of-centre Western parties.
Like what exactly? They vote left all over the west, because that's who appeases them. It's no different in the USA. He's also categorically wrong about their economic outlook.
T_D apparently think she somehow caused the wave of immigration in Europe, as opposed to the foreign policy of Republicans, because they're literally insane.
she's still a cock sucking globalist cunt and is still pro immigration, this is just her admitting they did too much too soon. this is her signal to the others they need to slow it down to avoid backlash.
You're retarded. Stealing policy ideas from an extremist party and incorporating a milder version of them into a mainstream party's platform is solid way to take the steam out of radical parties.
It was actually less to stop the left and more to try and stem emigration of the upper-working and lower-middle classes (skilled artisans, small business owners, clerks) to the United States.
That started because the Confederation tried a republican uprising and got crushed by the monarchists so the urban bourgeoisie left.
Bismark also found out if he went more democratic the country would swing further conservative because suprise suprise rural voters are super conservative and 19th century europe was pretty much entirely rural.
Bismark also found out if he went more democratic the country would swing further conservative because suprise suprise rural voters are super conservative and 19th century europe was pretty much entirely rural.
Reading about turn of the century Tsarist Russia it's maddening that with how badly that ruling class wanted to copy Bismarck that they never figured this out. Given the proper prodding Russia would've turned out a super-fascist state. Not great, but better than the Bolshevik alternative.
I bet the people close to him called him OVB. "Hey OVB, whats the only thing whiter than a french flag? The asses of them white german honeys." and then OVB said "Mein nigger."
Stealing policy ideas from an extremist party and incorporating a milder version of them into a mainstream party's platform is solid way to take the steam out of radical parties.
The situation I'm describing applies to states with a multi-party system and applies when the radical party is up-and-coming. The U.S.A is a two-party system for all intents and purposes and both parties are well established.
1980s GOP attitudes on welfare and unions were adopted pretty much wholesale by the Democratic Party.
Oh, is that why they went from being a party that traditionally represented blue collar workers to being a boutique party of outrage and social engineering that doesn't want to represent anyone other than academic weirdos and urban/suburban mayos?
The European left has been turning against immigration since the migrant crisis, because it massively erodes working class support for the center-left.
Are you saying super predator Hillary Clinton wasn't already racist? Are you saying Goldwater girl Hillary Clinton who had her goon float images of Obama in a turban wasn't already racist? Are you saying governeror's gal Hillary Clinton who utilized slave labor in her mansion wasn't already a racist?
Goddamn I would hate interacting with or talking about any minority people if I was a politician. When something as small as hot sauce gets remembered forever, I'd be hyperaware of trying not to look bad and probably look bad.
You just described almost every white person from Massachusetts. Super liberal and well meaning, but so many of them have never interacted with a minority in their lives that they don’t know how act around one aside from being awkward.
In an interview with the hip-hop morning show “The Breakfast Club” on urban radio station Power 105.1, an interviewer asked Clinton about items she always carried with her. Clinton’s answer was immediate. “Hot sauce,” she said.
"Da negroes love dem hottie totties," she continued. Bringing out the small bottle, she points to a small paragraph legible only to herself. "It says here that the chilis used in this were made from a reappropriated cotton field," she beamingly declares, smiling at the audience.
even crazier is how many people think it was a stunt to be more relatable. she has been reported as loving hot stuff for years. before she ever mentioned that. here's an article about her eating raw peppers from at least a year before the whole fiasco:
its not a stunt if its true, and by all information available, this is a long time thing. she was asked on a radio show what is something she always takes with her, and she replied hot sauce. there are stories online from aids who say she always had red pepper flakes with her, ate raw jalapenos every single day, etc. it wasnt a stunt. she likes hot food. i dont really see the problem? just because its unique?
Again, I'll say it as someone who loves spicy food and puts hot sauce on everything... why in the world is there a need to bring hot sauce in your bag considering it's everywhere? Unless you're trying to show off.
i assume because she is always traveling and doesnt eat like a "normal" person, in the sense that her meals are probably eaten on a lot of planes and maybe drives and stuff, or at events and shit. i dont know what her average day is like, so i couldnt tell you. i know people who take hot sauce places, though, she isnt the only one. and if tabasco happens to be her favorite, its certainly not everywhere. i typically only see it at breakfast places. you guys are trying really hard to question something that has been talked about for years, all to paint her negatively. its kinda pathetic, and like ive said, im not even much of a hillary fan at all, i just dont like false rumors.
how am i the one with the agenda? im not the one pushing a false narrative to support my agenda. im not some kind of big hillary fan, i just think its really lame when people spread false rumors. hell, i bashed her for it when i first heard about it because i thought she was pandering, then i saw lots of different articles about how its actually a real thing, so i dont think its fair that she is bashed for it.
um yeah... except there is a trail dating back at the very least, 6 years ago that says she takes tabasco with her everywhere... sounds like you're the one being racist?
I feel like you haven't watched the clip, she immediately gets called out "you know they will say you are pandering to blax" she responded "well, is it working?" in a haha im joking, but really is it? fashion.
Even if its true, only on a black radio station would she reply to the question "what do you always carry with you?" with "hot sauce", not her wedding ring, not a picture of her daughtervs family, but fuckin hot sauce granny says lmao
I get it, its a politicians job, shes just fucking terrible at it.
she responded "well, is it working?" in a haha im joking, but really is it? fashion.
that's just her humor, a similar outrage happened recently where someone confused a couple of black people and she said something to the effect of "yeah, they all look alike don't they?" she didn't mean they all look alike, though, it was a joke that she meant sarcastically, like basically rolling her eyes at the person while saying it.
i doubt she would only say that on a black radio station, because its something she is semi known for (carring tabasco, pepper flakes, and eating raw peppers every single day). also, how is it even pandering? i dont know a single black woman (or man) who carries hot sauce around. i know beyonce said it in a song, so maybe she heard it there and was like "whoa, me too!"
Well, she fooled me then, because when I went to her campaign website and read her stance on immigration there was like 10 points about helping immigrants and nothing else. I guess the "normal people" did the same trumptards always do about the daddy: don't listen to what they say, imagine what they mean instead.
Do you have an archive or mirror for that because I'm 99% sure that wasn't the case. I linked to it a lot to mock reddit lefties ("I agree with most of her platform, but lol yeah, I must be an alt right t_der because I'm laughing at you, cb2/politics/srd/tmor").
You don't have to agree with Hillary on anything, but to pretend she was a left reddit moron is just disingenuous. Remember in 2015 she flatly told BLM that while she agreed with some of their grievances, their approach and general demonizing of cops was stupid. A take that in 2018 on this website makes you a nazi.
So yeah, in general her platform was pretty centrist. "cuck" to right reddit and "nazi" to left reddit, and everyone else just thinks those two camps are retarded.
Immigration is almost never treated as a criminal issue. Life overstating your visa is not a crime. Technically jumping the border is, but you would have to actually have proof they jumped the border. 99% of the time it's treated as a civil issue, for the simple reason that civil violations have a much lower burden of proof. And deportation is consisted an acceptable civil remedy. If it were treated via criminal statutes they would have to go through an elaborate process of proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt in court if law. The entire system would grind to a hault because they couldn't handle the load.
Also asylum seekers who have a legitimate fear of returning have not broken the law even if their manner of entry would have otherwise been a violation. This is per congressional law, and treaty (refugee convention of 1951).
The problem wasn't just her, it was the Democratic party. As long as socialism and racism are the platform, people won't be interested. I would vote Democrat every time if clowns like Warren, Sanders, Harris, Booker, and that hot Puerto Rican babe weren't prominent party members.
Being anti-business and anti-mayo isn't a viable party platform in a mostly white nation built on business.
They especially don’t read campaign sites from 5 years ago. Normal people get their policy cues from when the candidates host SNL or when they eat things at state fairs
It was the two-tier legal system that put me off, one treatment for women and one for everyone else. I mean, she probably just wanted to codify what already exists but to actually see it written down as a campaign platform plank was mildly astonishing.
It was in her policy statements, although the last time I looked that bit had been reworked (it appears as though the pages were in a constant state of tweaking and adjustment across the entire campaign). I'll see if I can find an archive.is link to it.
Well, that's a pretty radical centrist position, I'm honestly surprised.
Imagine that, the radical idea that listening to voters and giving them what they want might help you win elections. I don't know how Hillary Clinton stumbled upon something so sensible but more power to her for being the blind squirrel that finds a nut.
This took me on an incredibly informative dive into wikipedia entries on European politics and I found out that the right wing populist party in Greece is called the Anexartitoi Ellines, or ANEL for short.
Four hundred million more people will suffer from water scarcity, and even in the northern latitudes heat waves will kill thousands each summer. It will be worse in the planet’s equatorial band. In India, where many cities now numbering in the many millions would become unliveably hot, there would be 32 times as many extreme heat waves, each lasting five times as long and exposing, in total, 93 times more people. This is two degrees — practically speaking, our absolute best-case climate scenario.
I mean, sure, it's fine unless you like drinking water, growing crops or catching fish. I'm just saying lots of people enjoy doing those things and they will probably move to your neighborhood.
They're on boats, you mong. Literally shoot them down. If we get to the point that nations have to closely monitor their food supplies, they're going to be able to assemble a force capable of monitoring their coasts.
yeah... that's totally going to happen given the way social trends are revealing themselves.
I mean over last few years we transitioned to the point where if you want to call illegal aliens, illegal aliens you better do it anonymously, be super rich or prepare to have your life ruined by a mob of people accusing you of racism.
but you are imagining the same generation that is raving about open borders and not dehumanizing illegals to not only condone but actually be the ones to do the shooting of refugees, rather than flying them into the country.
(speaking as a Canadian, whose overwhelmingly blue gov. just declared plans to import 1 million people into a country of 37mil, over next 3 years while south of us, Republicans seem to be rapidly losing ground)
Speaking as an Italian, this mild migration crisis was enough to make fascism popular again here. A skinhead shot 7 africans and people interviewed in tv were like "he was wrong, but I kinda see his point" and "it's the government's fault for allowing so many immigrants in". A local politician litarally said "we have to decide whether our race should keep on existing or should be erased", and won by a landslide.
Sjw virtue signaling is a luxury, a product of a people wealthy enough to prefer competition for status over competition for resources (and indeed the racists tend to be poor fucks). But take away that wealth, and see how people become vicious assholes again. When it's kill or be killed, people kill.
Again, you can try, but there are 7 or 8 billion of them and 1 to 2 billion of you. And they are (or will be) desperate in a way that soft coddled 1st worlders can barely understand.
Since teleportation is not a thing, travel takes time and resources (which they lack). They can't all come, and certainly not all at once.
Desperate people don't come up with daring plans for taking over other continents, they come up with simple plans for taking their neighbor's shit. When war for resources breaks out, it's going to be between third worlders, not between the first and the third world.
Desperation doesn't protect against missiles. I mean, Europenas were always a numerical minority, and yet colonized the whole fucking world.
I guess we'll see. Given how poorly developed countries have been able handle a few million Syrian/other refugees, I think the idea that you'll be able to stop hundreds of millions of people fleeing the disasters that you caused is laughable.
It was never a matter of being able to handle them, there just wasn't the political will to do so. We chose to let them in because to do otherwise would have been "racist", "inhumane" and "against international law". But those are all self imposed limits, and they're already starting to appear kinda dumb.
And they are (or will be) desperate in a way that soft coddled 1st worlders can barely understand.
"Soft coddled 1st worlders" literally enslaved the entire planet two centuries ago. Those soft, decadent Westerners also mounted the largest amphibious invasion in human history to facilitate the raping of the country that was stupid enough to make the same assumption you did. Those weak, wealthy Americans invented the fission bomb and dropped two of them on the other country that was also stupid enough to buy into this delusion.
Poor third worlders are coming in on boats and feet. The authoritarian government that would have rose to power because of the species ending crisis event will have enough bullets to deal with them.
Speaking as an American, our Canadian friend underestimates our white trash at his peril. We kill ourselves with fentanyl and shoot up our own schools for sport. Look at how we fight our wars: mostly poor (aka. no fucks given about status) mayo southerners and midwesterners in the combat arms plus advanced technology equals absurd k:d ratios.
So in this situation in your head, climate change is a species ending phenomenon yet governments are still the way they are? You're assuming we're going to be keeping a democracy in this situation. Fascist authoritarians are literally going to be at the top of the governments and democracy will have to stand in by the wayside until the extinction-level crisis is over, and that's a good thing. We need quick, effective measures to both secure resources and distribute them, and a little political assassination, migrant genocide and extreme nepotism is a very small price to pay to get a better chance at sirviving a LITERAL EXTINCTION LEVEL CRISIS EVENT.
I think you are severally underestimating the level of commitment to 'inclusiveness' that has taken root in the west when it comes to immigration - here in Canada we just have two voices heard on in the media on this. One says to let them all in because it's humane, the other is arguing that we need them because Canadians don't breed enough and we will economically collapse if we don't grow population via immigration.
Yes, the west will toughen up on immigrants as climate change gets worse - you have a point there.
But my bet is that it won't be until it's way too late for any effective way to stop the in-flow - once a significant population has been imported, getting tougher on the borders will mean de-facto civil war. So first it will be 'we can't use lethal force because it's evil' and than it will be 'we can't use lethal force because it's evil AND a quarter of the country would see it as genocide aimed at them specifically, and the country would collapse in civil war'
And also, it's not like during all this there won't be a shit ton of other problems related to climate, straining things.
You can walk from India to Europe if you get really desperate....you don’t need a boat. People have been doing it for thousands of years. Same with Africa. It’s how we colonised the whole planet. If shit gets real there is always legs
this is exactly why we need to implement effective border protection now, rather than wait until it's too late.
In hindsight Merkel's refusal to control the German borders in 2015, as well as the EU leadership's longstanding refusal to protect the EU's borders, might have caused the wake up call we need to prepare for the fifty times larger migration pressure in 2030.
calling other people boomers when you're regurgitating a modified version of the population bomb bullshit that literal boomers were pushing in the 1960s
Literally posts a picture of the shoreline/swamps in Louisiana and an article from vox with a prominent picture of the world half normal/half on fire/molten
Nothing is more despicable than someone who reverses themselves on long standing beliefs. Like it or not, i'll respect you more if you stay linear even if I don't agree with you. Her opinions are just whatever is most popular by whatever metrics they use that day.,aka gay marriage aka illegal migration.
Because it's one of the three emotional settings you retards have and appears to be the default setting. I mean, most of you are mildly seething all the time due to being butthurt that no one buys your revisionist version of history and remembers just how terribly your chosen sociopolitical system has performed, reject it, and laugh at you for being the modern useful idiots who say, "it can work this time."
Clinton was one of three heavyweights of the centre-left interviewed by the Guardian to better understand why their brand of politics appears to be failing. All three have seen their countries upended by political events that to some degree can be explained by the success of rightwing populism.
The other two interviewees, Tony Blair
Is anyone as universally despised by the modern left as Tony Blair?
No, then Shareblue and some other astroturf organizations took over the sub. Not even regular Reddit users are as retarded as the shills in /r/politics.
The last two presidential administrations should have taught you that we now live in an age where the election is never over. Trump and Obama spent more time fundraising and holding rallies than any presidents before them.
I've already practiced for the all the obvious traps they'll use to root me out. The correct answer to "Should Bernie have won?" is, of course, "Bernie quien?"
Clinton said rightwing populists in the west met “a psychological as much as political yearning to be told what to do, and where to go, and how to live and have their press basically stifled and so be given one version of reality.
Funny, this is pretty much exactly what's been said about the regressive left for years now.
In an interview with the Guardian, the former Democratic presidential candidate praised the generosity shown by the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, but suggested immigration was inflaming voters and contributed to the election of Donald Trump and Britain’s vote to leave the EU.
Does she indirectly blame Europe now that she lost against the Cheeto?
343 comments
1 BussyShillBot 2018-11-22
Lolis are for headpats and feed them healthy food, not for lewd.
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-11-22
Shut up you little weeb shit
1 wewladin 2018-11-22
😴😴😴
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
http://www.shadbase.com/hilloli-clitton/
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
http://www.shadbase.com/comic_folder/2016-09-15-hilloli-clitton.jpg
1 RyuunDragon 2018-11-22
I want you to meet a painful end someday in the future for letting me know this exists.
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
https://www.spankbang.com/2kk1a/video/trap+or+no+trap
1 MPHJ-7 2018-11-22
I, unfortnately, don't need to clik the link to know where it leads to.
1 SnapshillBot 2018-11-22
Promoting anarchofascism for 9 years and counting.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Baconlightning 2018-11-22
“WTF I love Muslim Immigration now”
-the_donald
1 cmakk1012 2018-11-22
Never forget that Muslims voted Repub until 9/11
They were Repubs once, they will be Repubs again!
-Q
1 AfricanBabyRefugee 2018-11-22
Jews rejected republicans more on midterms than muslims. Fucking muslims are more ourguys than jews! Can you believe that? All the cucking and ass kissing Trump has done for the long nose tribe and that's how they thank him lmao. Embarrassing.
1 Baconlightning 2018-11-22
Trump is asskissing the Saudi’s too though
1 zenicaone 2018-11-22
Saudis are "secret" Jews anyway.
1 1999-2017 2018-11-22
😂 moat Muslim's hate Saudi Arabia and the royals
1 LogicalSignal9 2018-11-22
The godless majority yeah. The orthodox Jew minority is possibly one of Trumps biggest fan bases ever though.
1 Krombopulos-Snake 2018-11-22
Trumplistilskin isn't a politician. He doesn't know how to play the game so he believed that kowtowing to Israeli issues and other groups will get him what he wants. All that happens is they get what they want, he gets laughed at by them and called a shill by people who actually believed he was competent.
Man in retrospect, our election was terrible but hilarious. We rather have a know nothing as president over the senator who helped wreck NYC as president.
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
Republicans are so retarded they make one of the most conservatice demographics vote left. Jfl at republicels
1 Baconlightning 2018-11-22
Same with hispanics
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
Exactly. They're so fucking bad at recruiting from demographics that arent old white boomers.
1 boyoyoyoyong 2018-11-22
Nah, they may be socially conservative but that's overpowered with their desire for gibs.
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
This is the most retarded take I've seen from you in ages.
So why did they consistently vote republican before 9/11? Was the republican party big on welfare up until that point?
Are you actually retarded? Most muslim and non-white countries are extremely conservative, both economically and socially. Also why do you ignore the fact that most of the prominent leftist thinkers and leaders were european?
1 Jas0nJewnova 2018-11-22
This is why I'm looking forward to America becoming majority-minority, seeing how white liberals react when the browns become big enough to vote in their own turbo conservative parties is the stuff of wet dreams
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
Jfl
1 badukbingepurge 2018-11-22
Is this the new super LOL?
Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.
1 hitlerallyliteral 2018-11-22
An acronym in an acronym, nice
1 Singulaire 2018-11-22
We should make dbl (dude bussy lmao) the new omegalul.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-22
The second they no longer care about being a minority they are guaranteed to revert to their natural state.
1 gumble212 2018-11-22
this but unironically
1 Trunks1173 2018-11-22
No, I think a lot of mirotity groups are now being lead by you guys people who only saw the conservative hatred for them turning their groups towards liberalism for the future.
1 Skyright 2018-11-22
Most Muslim countries aren't right economically, atleast in terms of welfare. The rich gulf states literally give out free money to all their citizens so they can keep their monarchy, poorer ones like Egypt and Pakistan are dominated with government owned corporations, tariffs and your usual overbearing regulations.
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
I am well aware of that because i grew up in one of those states. That being said, most muslim countries are not rich gulf monarchies.
Monarchies are also inherintly not left wing. Even the gulf states we were talking about are infested with capitalism in all its forms. Some like saudi arabia are even decreasing their social programs due to the oil issue.
This is a) over exagerated and b) does not make them very leftist
1 Scred62 2018-11-22
People assume “government owned” is the left wing alternative when actually it’s “worker owned” that were looking for. Another of those leftovers the Soviets left us with unfortunately.
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
It also comes from the american idea that socialism = government doing things.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-22
It comes from every socialist country doing that exact thing over and over.
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
If self identified communist countries are communist then i guess you also consider North Korea to be democratic.
1 Skyright 2018-11-22
Is Cuba Socialist? Government owns most stuff there :/
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-22
Lol, the political theory that is so fantastic it can literally never exist in real world.
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
You're right, progress is actually bad for humanity.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-22
Progress how? How could it ever be implemented? We already have progress, and Communists jerk off to insulting them calling them succdems in between murder fantasies.
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
Capitalism kills and oppresses many people also. Tbh transotioning from feudalism was a mistake
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-22
Lmao, I wish you were Iranian so you could have been properly transitioned.
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
That's very rude!!!
1 WiggityWatchinNews 2018-11-22
Less people are living in poverty today than at any other time in history
1 JoeFalchetto 2018-11-22
And from Marx saying that the state could be a proxy for workers and a way to organize their ownership.
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
When marx said that did you take it to mean a capitalist state? Because lol
1 Time_to_Drink 2018-11-22
You “grew up” in one of those states?
Don’t be coy, which kind of inbred goat fucker are you?
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
Yes you retard, as in "I was a resident and not a citizen who was given those benefits" if yoymu prefer me to spell it out.
The type taking all your wimminz
1 Time_to_Drink 2018-11-22
Take them, they are fat and sloppy and not hairy enough for this twinkly twink.
Still didn’t answer the question. If this is becauseyou are some sort of army brat that occasionally got your fat pimply ass dragged into downtown Doha for a shitty Jasmine burger, spare me your incisive “knowledge” on the land of Allah.
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
I'll leave you guessing 😘😘
1 Skyright 2018-11-22
They aren't economically right though which is my point. Having as big a welfare state as them is not economically right.
Pakistan and Egypt have military run corporations not paying rent, electricity bill or taxes to the point private businesses can't compete with them. If a foreign company still manages to outcompete them, they just ban imports of that product. Pretty big problem imo.
What about the huge tariffs and crazy amount of regulations? Are those economically right too?
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
Yes, and most Muslim countries do not have big welfare states, we've been over this.
Scale is important here. Having government run corporation doesn't make you a left wing government.
Again, those are within the scope of capitalism. Do you think the US government is actually economically leftist because it enforces regulations and has been trending more protectionist?
1 Skyright 2018-11-22
The reason they don't is because they're poor. Barely any poor country has a welfare state. You can only compare rich muslim countries with rich western countries when talking about welfare state.
Are all capitalist countries economically right then? Ofcourse it's within the scope of capitalism, the only thing within the scope of communism is your own head so you can shoot yourself and end the misery.
I am using regular people scale, not mentally ill people ones. More free trade = more right economically, more welfare= more left economically. Free trade with no welfare= far right economically, very restricted trade and lots of welfare (like Cuba) = far left economically. Most countries are in the middle.
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
Ah no... you can be poor and have social services, there are leftist countries which are still poor. But even if we go by your logic, the rich gulf states are by no means leftist, both socially and economically.
You responded to my question with another question without answering it. Again, is the US economically leftist according to you?
Also not all capitalist governments are right wing, my point is protectionism and regulations doesn't make a country left wing. Work on your reading ability.
What are you even on about lol
1 LongPostBot 2018-11-22
All those words won't bring daddy back.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
It's over
1 nanonan 2018-11-22
Capitalism is just as left wing as it is right you moron.
1 MPHJ-7 2018-11-22
So, in other words, they aren't left-wing at all?
1 Hemingwavy 2018-11-22
Imagine thinking incestuous mergers of corporations and government wasn't peak right wing.
1 IDFSHILL 2018-11-22
I think you're misunderstanding the point of that "free money."
The royal families just hand out cash so the population doesn't revolt against them. They're some of the most socially conservative countries on earth, they're ultra conservative even.
1 Skyright 2018-11-22
I mentioned that. It's free money for the citizens who don't do any work though. The government brings in foreigners to do all the work, takes most of the profit for the royal family and gives some of it to the citizens so they shut up and don't ask for a democracy.
1 muck4doo 2018-11-22
Make up your fucking mind. Are they handing them out free cash, or robbing them? I'm surprised your lazy eye doesn't look even more retarded.
1 IDFSHILL 2018-11-22
You know you can do both, correct? Using the natural resources of the country to become wealthy while handing out scraps to the plebes.
1 muck4doo 2018-11-22
Every country uses it's resources to try to gain wealth. You just stated their governments are handing them out free cash, and that is robbery. You wanna give most the money to Mo Goat Herder and let him make multi-national deals? You actually make more sense when you are just angry sperging against women.
1 IDFSHILL 2018-11-22
How can you not comprehend this? A monarchy throwing crumbs at plebes to keep them calm doesn't mean they aren't robbing the country blind.
Do you have any idea how much cash the royal family has?
1 muck4doo 2018-11-22
They are throwing enough cash at the people to keep them happy. You can't do that when you are poor. Go back to r/cth and muse about how the world would be better if the janitors controlled the wealth.
1 IDFSHILL 2018-11-22
This is some wild shit, it's not often you catch people unironically defending a monarchy and pretending what they do is acceptable.
1 muck4doo 2018-11-22
This is some wild shit. A retard claiming giving people free money is robbing them.
1 IDFSHILL 2018-11-22
They're literally using the entire natural wealth of the country for their own personal enrichment.
They're then throwing a trivial amount back at the plebes to placate them. Let me explain this in even a way your low IQ rightoid brain can understand.
Let's say you're the head of a tribe, your tribe holds dominion over a large swathe of land. You inherited the leadership role of this tribe, you weren't elected, you didn't do anything other than be born.
You then exploit this land for your own personal wealth, you take 98% of the revenue from the forests, the lakes, the ground. You then throw 2% back at the plebes. Is this robbery?
1 muck4doo 2018-11-22
2% sounds like something you pulled out your ass.
1 IDFSHILL 2018-11-22
Lmao, you have no fucking clue how much money the Saudi royal family owns.
We're talking over a trillion fucking dollars.
1 muck4doo 2018-11-22
2% sounds like something that was pulled out of your ass.
1 IDFSHILL 2018-11-22
2% might be hyperbolic, but don't pretend they aren't hoarding the vast majority of this wealth.
1 IDFSHILL 2018-11-22
The saudi welfare system seems to be about 5 billion dollars yearly.
They have over a trillion dollars in wealth.
1 muck4doo 2018-11-22
We get it. You have no source for 2% other than your ass and feels. Maybe you'd be happy if the money went to the Al-Shaykh family instead.
1 IDFSHILL 2018-11-22
This is just absurd, you actually might be one of the least intelligent people I've ever seen on /r/drama.
What is with this trend of rightoids not understanding numbers and defending literal monarchies?
1 muck4doo 2018-11-22
LOL! You go girl with your fake numbers based on feels. No wonder women don't like you.
1 IDFSHILL 2018-11-22
Looks like your code is finally reaching the point where it starts bringing up women as if that has any relation to this argument.
You need more RAM?
1 muck4doo 2018-11-22
LOL! Bots! Amiright!?! That proves giving people money must be robbing them? Chapotards are funny.
1 IDFSHILL 2018-11-22
The fact you think I have any relation to chapo is just more evidence of the fact you have severe cognitive problems.
1 muck4doo 2018-11-22
Yeah, we get it. Mayos promising people free shit in America and Europe is good to get support for leaders. Brown people doing the same in their countries equals robbery. I get your point.
This post brought to you by your local dairy farmer. Do you settle for 2% milk when there are trillions of cows?
1 IDFSHILL 2018-11-22
The fact you think a western democracy using tax income from the population to maintain a social safety net is the same as a monarchy hoarding the wealth of an entire country for themselves says everything that needs to be said.
You just aren't smart enough to have this discussion.
1 muck4doo 2018-11-22
You aren't smart enough to realize you are lolcow due to your sophomoric stupidity, but you keep on fighting the good fight.
1 IDFSHILL 2018-11-22
You literally just tried to claim a western democracy using tax income to fund social safety nets, social safety nets voted on by the population, is on equal footing with a monarchy hoarding the natural resources of an entire country for personal enrichment.
The idea you think I'm the lolcow here, or that I'm the retard is just staggering. The simple fact you thought the argument you tried to use was a good one is just ironclad proof of a cognitive problem.
1 seenten 2018-11-22
Enough; you're both lolcows
1 _Suprememe_ 2018-11-22
Imagine unironically white knighting for a medieval Islamic monarchy. I hope muck4doo is at least getting paid for these posts.
1 Vilizo 2018-11-22
It's funny how aggressive you're being despite the fact that you're categorically and demonstrably wrong.
If you actually did some research rather than just pontificating about how Muslims would vote if things were different, you'd know that (Muslims are the single most reliable voting block for the left-wing Labour party in the UK)[http://www.brin.ac.uk/2017/religious-affiliation-and-party-choice-at-the-2017-general-election/], and that (in Germany they most often support the centre-left SDP)[https://www.dw.com/en/how-will-turkish-germans-vote-in-the-countrys-upcoming-election/a-40229374]. I can't find any results for Sweden, Netherlands etc, but it's a widely-known phenomenon that they vote left in Europe and vote right when still eligible to do so in their country of origin.
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
I referred to literal historical facts, you ignoring them doesn't make them wrong.
Yes because the right wing in those countries tends to be anti muslim specifically, much like the republican party post 9/11.
Yes... Meaning the majority of Muslims worldwide are right wing both economically and socially. Maybe next time you should actually read my comment
1 Vilizo 2018-11-22
So the future of democracy is who can bend over the furthest for minorities? Surely very conducive to success.
Yet in practice they'll vote for whoever will appease them the most. Also they use welfare at a hugely disproportionate rate in the UK and Germany, so you're completely misguided if you think they'd vote to reduce it.
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-22
If you have two parties and one of them explicitly hates you for your ethnic or religious beliefs than you'll probably vote for the other one, it isn't that hard to understand.
Democracy is very flawed thought so I'm not interested in defending it.
No shit? My original comment was about the united states where the Muslim population is significantly richer than its European counterparts.
1 blackbluegrey 2018-11-22
The Conservative party does not hate Muslims. You're making the mistake of extrapolating from the Republicans to draw conclusions about all other right-of-centre Western parties.
1 Somenakedguy 2018-11-22
Is it a good workout moving goalposts like that?
1 Vilizo 2018-11-22
Like what exactly? They vote left all over the west, because that's who appeases them. It's no different in the USA. He's also categorically wrong about their economic outlook.
1 Somenakedguy 2018-11-22
What does any of this nonsense have to do with how Muslims voted in the US pre-9/11?
1 morbidru 2018-11-22
muslims vote for
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_Social_Democratic_Party
in Sweden.
1 dootwthesickness_II 2018-11-22
Mayos are the greediest gibbers of them all, mate.
1 Think_Once 2018-11-22
If anyone really wants to see the trends:
Exit Polls: How Voting Blocs Have Shifted From the ’80s to Now
1 911roofer 2018-11-22
Then the Republicans caught on to their wicked schemes and plots.
1 BeanerShnitzel 2018-11-22
Some one post this to the_donald, I want to see how they spin it.
1 SpiceAndEvNice 2018-11-22
Haven’t visited the sub yet but I’m 99% the headline will be “Hillary bends the knee!!!!!” Or some other dumb shit like that.
1 chromehope 2018-11-22
T_D apparently think she somehow caused the wave of immigration in Europe, as opposed to the foreign policy of Republicans, because they're literally insane.
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2018-11-22
Importing wahabi muslims to own the libs epic syle!
1 drtoszi 2018-11-22
Rent Free
1 cantbebothered67836 2018-11-22
More like "See, even Beelzebub thinks thems darkies is bad news!"
1 cheeseburgerhandy 2018-11-22
she's still a cock sucking globalist cunt and is still pro immigration, this is just her admitting they did too much too soon. this is her signal to the others they need to slow it down to avoid backlash.
1 Bentoki 2018-11-22
Am I retarded or is this message entirely contradictory?
1 Arcueido 2018-11-22
You're retarded. Stealing policy ideas from an extremist party and incorporating a milder version of them into a mainstream party's platform is solid way to take the steam out of radical parties.
1 SpacemanSkiff 2018-11-22
Yup. Otto von Bismarck did this. He instituted the world's first welfare system in Prussia in order to own the libs (and it worked too).
1 cimarafa 2018-11-22
It was actually less to stop the left and more to try and stem emigration of the upper-working and lower-middle classes (skilled artisans, small business owners, clerks) to the United States.
1 ProGenji 2018-11-22
That started because the Confederation tried a republican uprising and got crushed by the monarchists so the urban bourgeoisie left.
Bismark also found out if he went more democratic the country would swing further conservative because suprise suprise rural voters are super conservative and 19th century europe was pretty much entirely rural.
1 solowng 2018-11-22
Reading about turn of the century Tsarist Russia it's maddening that with how badly that ruling class wanted to copy Bismarck that they never figured this out. Given the proper prodding Russia would've turned out a super-fascist state. Not great, but better than the Bolshevik alternative.
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
excuse me sweaty but the one true path is communism
the one true path to trannysexuality
1 ThePathToOne 2018-11-22
I bet the people close to him called him OVB. "Hey OVB, whats the only thing whiter than a french flag? The asses of them white german honeys." and then OVB said "Mein nigger."
1 oss_spy 2018-11-22
I don't want to upvote you but it looks like I need to.
1 loli_esports 2018-11-22
Bismark-v
1 HasuTeras 2018-11-22
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-11-22
Otherwise known as: a compromise.
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
That sure is centrism but I don't compromise on the radical part.
1 Time_to_Drink 2018-11-22
Fascist
1 Vladith 2018-11-22
Doesn't always work that way. 1980s GOP attitudes on welfare and unions were adopted pretty much wholesale by the Democratic Party.
1 Arcueido 2018-11-22
The situation I'm describing applies to states with a multi-party system and applies when the radical party is up-and-coming. The U.S.A is a two-party system for all intents and purposes and both parties are well established.
1 jubbergun 2018-11-22
Oh, is that why they went from being a party that traditionally represented blue collar workers to being a boutique party of outrage and social engineering that doesn't want to represent anyone other than academic weirdos and urban/suburban mayos?
1 JurijFedorov 2018-11-22
Both.
1 cimarafa 2018-11-22
The European left has been turning against immigration since the migrant crisis, because it massively erodes working class support for the center-left.
1 BIknkbtKitNwniS 2018-11-22
"Hillary Clinton was always a racist anyway," Chapo probably
1 mydramaaccount 2018-11-22
Are you saying super predator Hillary Clinton wasn't already racist? Are you saying Goldwater girl Hillary Clinton who had her goon float images of Obama in a turban wasn't already racist? Are you saying governeror's gal Hillary Clinton who utilized slave labor in her mansion wasn't already a racist?
1 EyeseeFN 2018-11-22
You forgot busting out hot sauce for a black family.
1 Gay-Cumshot 2018-11-22
Aight negroes, I'm down wit y'all at this here cookout
1 BeastTrinity 2018-11-22
Goddamn I would hate interacting with or talking about any minority people if I was a politician. When something as small as hot sauce gets remembered forever, I'd be hyperaware of trying not to look bad and probably look bad.
1 MySecretPostOffice 2018-11-22
Good thing that you won't be a politician.
1 [deleted] 2018-11-22
[removed]
1 5sharm5 2018-11-22
You just described almost every white person from Massachusetts. Super liberal and well meaning, but so many of them have never interacted with a minority in their lives that they don’t know how act around one aside from being awkward.
1 gumble212 2018-11-22
tbh this is pretty embarassing
1 KirklandSignatureDad 2018-11-22
how is this embarrassing when its actually true? she was asked a question and she gave an interesting and true answer.
1 gumble212 2018-11-22
she can still win
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
"Da negroes love dem hottie totties," she continued. Bringing out the small bottle, she points to a small paragraph legible only to herself. "It says here that the chilis used in this were made from a reappropriated cotton field," she beamingly declares, smiling at the audience.
1 rnjbond 2018-11-22
That was such a dumb stunt to try to be relatable.
I love spicy food and put hot sauce on everything. And yet I don't carry hot sauce in my backpack because you can get hot sauce anywhere.
1 KirklandSignatureDad 2018-11-22
even crazier is how many people think it was a stunt to be more relatable. she has been reported as loving hot stuff for years. before she ever mentioned that. here's an article about her eating raw peppers from at least a year before the whole fiasco:
https://theweek.com/speedreads/595516/hillary-clinton-pops-raw-jalapenos-campaign-trail-like-potato-chips-former-aide-says
1 rnjbond 2018-11-22
Carrying hot sauce in your purse and bragging about it on a radio show is a stunt. Liking hot sauce is not.
1 KirklandSignatureDad 2018-11-22
its not a stunt if its true, and by all information available, this is a long time thing. she was asked on a radio show what is something she always takes with her, and she replied hot sauce. there are stories online from aids who say she always had red pepper flakes with her, ate raw jalapenos every single day, etc. it wasnt a stunt. she likes hot food. i dont really see the problem? just because its unique?
1 rnjbond 2018-11-22
Again, I'll say it as someone who loves spicy food and puts hot sauce on everything... why in the world is there a need to bring hot sauce in your bag considering it's everywhere? Unless you're trying to show off.
1 KirklandSignatureDad 2018-11-22
i assume because she is always traveling and doesnt eat like a "normal" person, in the sense that her meals are probably eaten on a lot of planes and maybe drives and stuff, or at events and shit. i dont know what her average day is like, so i couldnt tell you. i know people who take hot sauce places, though, she isnt the only one. and if tabasco happens to be her favorite, its certainly not everywhere. i typically only see it at breakfast places. you guys are trying really hard to question something that has been talked about for years, all to paint her negatively. its kinda pathetic, and like ive said, im not even much of a hillary fan at all, i just dont like false rumors.
1 Trudy_Wiegel 2018-11-22
Ok agenda andy calm it down a notch
1 KirklandSignatureDad 2018-11-22
how am i the one with the agenda? im not the one pushing a false narrative to support my agenda. im not some kind of big hillary fan, i just think its really lame when people spread false rumors. hell, i bashed her for it when i first heard about it because i thought she was pandering, then i saw lots of different articles about how its actually a real thing, so i dont think its fair that she is bashed for it.
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
I'm bashing her for having hot sauce in her purse. That's weird and unrelatable and makes me less likely to vot for her if I was a burger.
1 Trudy_Wiegel 2018-11-22
Yeah sure she totally wasnt pandering to the room full of blax and their listeners dude
1 KirklandSignatureDad 2018-11-22
um yeah... except there is a trail dating back at the very least, 6 years ago that says she takes tabasco with her everywhere... sounds like you're the one being racist?
1 Trudy_Wiegel 2018-11-22
I feel like you haven't watched the clip, she immediately gets called out "you know they will say you are pandering to blax" she responded "well, is it working?" in a haha im joking, but really is it? fashion.
Even if its true, only on a black radio station would she reply to the question "what do you always carry with you?" with "hot sauce", not her wedding ring, not a picture of her daughtervs family, but fuckin hot sauce granny says lmao
I get it, its a politicians job, shes just fucking terrible at it.
1 KirklandSignatureDad 2018-11-22
that's just her humor, a similar outrage happened recently where someone confused a couple of black people and she said something to the effect of "yeah, they all look alike don't they?" she didn't mean they all look alike, though, it was a joke that she meant sarcastically, like basically rolling her eyes at the person while saying it.
i doubt she would only say that on a black radio station, because its something she is semi known for (carring tabasco, pepper flakes, and eating raw peppers every single day). also, how is it even pandering? i dont know a single black woman (or man) who carries hot sauce around. i know beyonce said it in a song, so maybe she heard it there and was like "whoa, me too!"
1 Trudy_Wiegel 2018-11-22
Ok agenda andy calm it down a notch
1 KirklandSignatureDad 2018-11-22
only people here with an agenda are you guys, who push your own agenda in the face of the facts
1 Quietus42 2018-11-22
But Mommy's always had hot sauce in her purse 🤨
1 KirklandSignatureDad 2018-11-22
shhh we have an agenda here, quit it with the truth, that shit aint welcome here!!!
1 cmakk1012 2018-11-22
This but unironically
1 BeanerShnitzel 2018-11-22
You forgot the pedophile ring and Seth Rich, if you’re gonna sperg you gotta commit fully!!
1 oddomata 2018-11-22
Don’t forget Bill’s hand in personally lethally injecting Ricky Ray Rector.
1 dootwthesickness_II 2018-11-22
So?
1 oddomata 2018-11-22
Bill was allegedly erect.
1 dootwthesickness_II 2018-11-22
Croissants.
1 Cholestorol-kun 2018-11-22
oh my god they're here
1 lightpath7 2018-11-22
She wouldn't say something as racist as "they all look alike" though.
​
1 Ghdust2 2018-11-22
Chapo has never liked Hillary. They think she’s too conservative.
1 mrv3 2018-11-22
Chapo thinks Bernie is too conservative.
1 error404brain 2018-11-22
>Chapo
>Liking anything right of stalin
lmao.
1 Wegwerfkontobelegt 2018-11-22
Stalin didn't even murder all the kulaks, he was clearly a wishy-washy centrist neoliberal.
1 drizzle_dorf 2018-11-22
Wait, you think Chapo likes Clinton??
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2018-11-22
Imagine being so retarded you think a bunch of tankies would support a neolib
1 the_popcorn_pisser 2018-11-22
That’s exactly what they are saying, and have said for years tbqh.
I’m more interested in the neolibs and politics subs to this.
1 DaddyDidNothingWrong 2018-11-22
She was, though.
"Superpredators" lulz
1 URGENTCAFE 2018-11-22
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChapoTrapHouse/comments/9zet2u/have_we_made_this_joke_yet/?st=JOT86I8J&sh=3ddd6715
1 Unkill_is_dill 2018-11-22
Chapo has always hated Hillary more than t_D though.
1 Eugene_V_Chomsky 2018-11-22
Chapo always hated Hillary.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2018-11-22
I unironically love Mommy Clinton
1 ___Moufasa___ 2018-11-22
Ew
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2018-11-22
😡
1 retarded4bustin 2018-11-22
/r/drama is unironically Hildawg territory.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-11-22
Well, that's a pretty radical centrist position, I'm honestly surprised.
1 rhyme-ocerus 2018-11-22
Surprised? She's always been pretty centrist. That's why normal people voted for her
1 zergling_Lester 2018-11-22
Well, she fooled me then, because when I went to her campaign website and read her stance on immigration there was like 10 points about helping immigrants and nothing else. I guess the "normal people" did the same trumptards always do about the daddy: don't listen to what they say, imagine what they mean instead.
1 rhyme-ocerus 2018-11-22
Do you have an archive or mirror for that because I'm 99% sure that wasn't the case. I linked to it a lot to mock reddit lefties ("I agree with most of her platform, but lol yeah, I must be an alt right t_der because I'm laughing at you, cb2/politics/srd/tmor").
You don't have to agree with Hillary on anything, but to pretend she was a left reddit moron is just disingenuous. Remember in 2015 she flatly told BLM that while she agreed with some of their grievances, their approach and general demonizing of cops was stupid. A take that in 2018 on this website makes you a nazi.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-11-22
https://web.archive.org/web/20160731082037/https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/immigration-reform/
Well, all right, there are two sentences that pay lip service to right-wing concerns.
1 rhyme-ocerus 2018-11-22
So yeah, in general her platform was pretty centrist. "cuck" to right reddit and "nazi" to left reddit, and everyone else just thinks those two camps are retarded.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-11-22
It's not "pretty centrist", it's literally two non-bolded sentences. Also I added an edit.
1 rhyme-ocerus 2018-11-22
I'm talking about the overall platform; I'm not poor so I don't really care about immigration.
1 allendrio 2018-11-22
oof
1 ironicshitpostr 2018-11-22
He's not wrong tho
1 zergling_Lester 2018-11-22
Do you expect me to vote for someone just because lefties say they are a fascist? Noo, I'm a clever boy, you won't trick me like that!
1 OriginalRazzmatazz 2018-11-22
povertycels BTFO
1 Watermark03 2018-11-22
Immigration is almost never treated as a criminal issue. Life overstating your visa is not a crime. Technically jumping the border is, but you would have to actually have proof they jumped the border. 99% of the time it's treated as a civil issue, for the simple reason that civil violations have a much lower burden of proof. And deportation is consisted an acceptable civil remedy. If it were treated via criminal statutes they would have to go through an elaborate process of proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt in court if law. The entire system would grind to a hault because they couldn't handle the load.
Also asylum seekers who have a legitimate fear of returning have not broken the law even if their manner of entry would have otherwise been a violation. This is per congressional law, and treaty (refugee convention of 1951).
1 zergling_Lester 2018-11-22
Are you on a meth binge right now?
1 HeftyHovercraft 2018-11-22
The problem wasn't just her, it was the Democratic party. As long as socialism and racism are the platform, people won't be interested. I would vote Democrat every time if clowns like Warren, Sanders, Harris, Booker, and that hot Puerto Rican babe weren't prominent party members.
Being anti-business and anti-mayo isn't a viable party platform in a mostly white nation built on business.
1 froibo 2018-11-22
It's not okay to be white.
1 Redactor0 2018-11-22
Everything there was about what she was gonna do for non-citizens. You know, people who can't vote in the damn election. Not a brilliant move.
1 next_acc 2018-11-22
Remember the shitstorm after this? Clinton admitted she's for 'open borders' in paid, private speech
1 nomad1c 2018-11-22
to be fair she was probably pandering to the browns
1 next_acc 2018-11-22
to be fair she is never not pandering
1 Time_to_Drink 2018-11-22
Normal people don’t read campaign websites you fucking freak
1 zergling_Lester 2018-11-22
You people are dogs, I shall proceed under the usual assumption that Mommy's website is representative of the shit she told normies otherwise.
1 Time_to_Drink 2018-11-22
They especially don’t read campaign sites from 5 years ago. Normal people get their policy cues from when the candidates host SNL or when they eat things at state fairs
1 SRSLovesGawker 2018-11-22
It was the two-tier legal system that put me off, one treatment for women and one for everyone else. I mean, she probably just wanted to codify what already exists but to actually see it written down as a campaign platform plank was mildly astonishing.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-11-22
Links?
1 SRSLovesGawker 2018-11-22
It was in her policy statements, although the last time I looked that bit had been reworked (it appears as though the pages were in a constant state of tweaking and adjustment across the entire campaign). I'll see if I can find an archive.is link to it.
1 AttainedAndDestroyed 2018-11-22
/pol/ said it so it must be true.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-22
Maybe she should have ran with that instead?
1 rhyme-ocerus 2018-11-22
Her platform was what she ran on. If you thought she was a trollx poster, that's on you
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-22
She advertised herself like that. She was literally platforming child rapist slay queens like Lena Dunham at the DNC Convention.
1 AttainedAndDestroyed 2018-11-22
You know about those funny boomers who fall for obvious fake news on Facebook like Pizzagate or Q? You are literally one of them.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-22
The internet said so? I didn't watch the internet, I watched her campaign.
1 ObsessedAussie 2018-11-22
Yup i think that's a good call by her as much as i dislike her she sometimes has some valid points
1 exploding-cake 2018-11-22
She will fuck it all up somehow.
I can’t state how much I love this woman.
1 jubbergun 2018-11-22
Imagine that, the radical idea that listening to voters and giving them what they want might help you win elections. I don't know how Hillary Clinton stumbled upon something so sensible but more power to her for being the blind squirrel that finds a nut.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-11-22
Couldn't say it better myself tbh
1 Zozbot 2018-11-22
zoz
1 Zozbot 2018-11-22
zle
1 Zozbot 2018-11-22
zozzle
1 zergling_Lester 2018-11-22
OH MY GOD IT HAPPENED TO ME AT LAST OH MY GOD
1 cheers_grills 2018-11-22
fag
1 nomad1c 2018-11-22
voters will like what i tell them to like. especially when i call them deplorable
1 froibo 2018-11-22
Wow, a left leaning centrists sounds centrist.
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2018-11-22
Lmaooooo
1 SeattleFingers 2018-11-22
"I always carry a packet of hummus in my purse"
1 ConfuseTheJews 2018-11-22
Wait until she starts bringing out the "Hillary Frogs"
1 PM_ME_YA_TATTAS 2018-11-22
with all the daddy stuff going on all the time, I'm happy that drama mommy is returning to the spotlight
2020 should end in Trump and Hillary falling in love and ruling together as America's First king and queen
1 LadyChiyo 2018-11-22
I'm getting tingles all over just thinking about it ❤
1 JayBaumanManhole 2018-11-22
It's over for Bill-cels
1 ironicshitpostr 2018-11-22
Wow
The ultimate power couple
1 DinosSuck 2018-11-22
This took me on an incredibly informative dive into wikipedia entries on European politics and I found out that the right wing populist party in Greece is called the Anexartitoi Ellines, or ANEL for short.
HAHAHAHAHA ANEL! HAHAHAHA
1 ObsessedAussie 2018-11-22
Bussy lmao!
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
ANELE Anti-Muslim! ANELE ANELE PogChamp
1 rhyme-ocerus 2018-11-22
/r/politics: "Hillary is alt right"
1 HeftyHovercraft 2018-11-22
/r/The_Donald: "Hillary is all right"
1 CaptainDouchington 2018-11-22
/r/politics - immigrants only vote republican!
1 trump_pushes_mongo 2018-11-22
This but unironically now.
1 whiskerbiscuit17 2018-11-22
Nah just silence
1 Ridicatlthrowaway 2018-11-22
“She lost, she no longer exist!”
1 XhotwheelsloverX 2018-11-22
https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/9zedo5/hillary_clinton_europe_must_curb_immigration_to/
It got buried fast
1 rhyme-ocerus 2018-11-22
lol they seriously think that everyone who doesn't agree with their weird idiotic populist shit is conservative
1 Dingus_Kahn 2018-11-22
Why did they just downvote the story and upvote comments? Hmmm smart people
1 Mexagon 2018-11-22
As if the mods there wouldn't be deleting 100 of posts about it.
1 MeagerMistake23 2018-11-22
Hahaha, good fucking luck. Everything south of 23°N is likely to be nigh-uninhabitable in ~30 years.
Northern hemisphere better get your spare bedrooms ready for a billion+ uninvited houseguests.
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
Imagine allowing hordes of impoverished migrants in instead of letting them drown in their submerged archipelagos lol
1 MeagerMistake23 2018-11-22
Nah mate, there's no "letting" involved. You're outnumbered 6:1.
Your best chance was to stop climate change in the 1990s, but we all know how that went.
1 snowkarl 2018-11-22
Are you making some sort of joke I'm not getting here?
All of Africa, Asia and South America uninhabitable within 3 decades?
I know today's youth is pretty climate alarmist but Jesus what a fantasy lol.
1 MeagerMistake23 2018-11-22
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/10/un-says-climate-genocide-coming-but-its-worse-than-that.html
Are you a boomer?
1 snowkarl 2018-11-22
Do you think that's uninhabitable?
2.5 billion people on earth already suffer from water scarcity you mongoloid. Heat waves killed 5000 people in Europe in 2005.
Sure it's not a good scenario but calm down.
1 MeagerMistake23 2018-11-22
I mean, sure, it's fine unless you like drinking water, growing crops or catching fish. I'm just saying lots of people enjoy doing those things and they will probably move to your neighborhood.
Enjoy.
1 snowkarl 2018-11-22
Do you think 1 billion people can cross with fishing boats from Libya to Italy?
Or do you think 90% of them will die in these extreme heat waves you describe, on the way through literally the hottest place on earth?
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
They're on boats, you mong. Literally shoot them down. If we get to the point that nations have to closely monitor their food supplies, they're going to be able to assemble a force capable of monitoring their coasts.
1 MayNotBeAPervert 2018-11-22
yeah... that's totally going to happen given the way social trends are revealing themselves.
I mean over last few years we transitioned to the point where if you want to call illegal aliens, illegal aliens you better do it anonymously, be super rich or prepare to have your life ruined by a mob of people accusing you of racism.
but you are imagining the same generation that is raving about open borders and not dehumanizing illegals to not only condone but actually be the ones to do the shooting of refugees, rather than flying them into the country.
(speaking as a Canadian, whose overwhelmingly blue gov. just declared plans to import 1 million people into a country of 37mil, over next 3 years while south of us, Republicans seem to be rapidly losing ground)
1 imstartingtogetangry 2018-11-22
Speaking as an Italian, this mild migration crisis was enough to make fascism popular again here. A skinhead shot 7 africans and people interviewed in tv were like "he was wrong, but I kinda see his point" and "it's the government's fault for allowing so many immigrants in". A local politician litarally said "we have to decide whether our race should keep on existing or should be erased", and won by a landslide.
Sjw virtue signaling is a luxury, a product of a people wealthy enough to prefer competition for status over competition for resources (and indeed the racists tend to be poor fucks). But take away that wealth, and see how people become vicious assholes again. When it's kill or be killed, people kill.
1 MeagerMistake23 2018-11-22
Again, you can try, but there are 7 or 8 billion of them and 1 to 2 billion of you. And they are (or will be) desperate in a way that soft coddled 1st worlders can barely understand.
1 imstartingtogetangry 2018-11-22
1 MeagerMistake23 2018-11-22
I guess we'll see. Given how poorly developed countries have been able handle a few million Syrian/other refugees, I think the idea that you'll be able to stop hundreds of millions of people fleeing the disasters that you caused is laughable.
1 18aidanme 2018-11-22
The only reasons syrians are in Europe is because the greedy governments want them for cheap labor you mong.
1 imstartingtogetangry 2018-11-22
It was never a matter of being able to handle them, there just wasn't the political will to do so. We chose to let them in because to do otherwise would have been "racist", "inhumane" and "against international law". But those are all self imposed limits, and they're already starting to appear kinda dumb.
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2018-11-22
"Soft coddled 1st worlders" literally enslaved the entire planet two centuries ago. Those soft, decadent Westerners also mounted the largest amphibious invasion in human history to facilitate the raping of the country that was stupid enough to make the same assumption you did. Those weak, wealthy Americans invented the fission bomb and dropped two of them on the other country that was also stupid enough to buy into this delusion.
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
They. Are. On. Boats. And. On. Foot.
Poor third worlders are coming in on boats and feet. The authoritarian government that would have rose to power because of the species ending crisis event will have enough bullets to deal with them.
1 solowng 2018-11-22
Speaking as an American, our Canadian friend underestimates our white trash at his peril. We kill ourselves with fentanyl and shoot up our own schools for sport. Look at how we fight our wars: mostly poor (aka. no fucks given about status) mayo southerners and midwesterners in the combat arms plus advanced technology equals absurd k:d ratios.
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
So in this situation in your head, climate change is a species ending phenomenon yet governments are still the way they are? You're assuming we're going to be keeping a democracy in this situation. Fascist authoritarians are literally going to be at the top of the governments and democracy will have to stand in by the wayside until the extinction-level crisis is over, and that's a good thing. We need quick, effective measures to both secure resources and distribute them, and a little political assassination, migrant genocide and extreme nepotism is a very small price to pay to get a better chance at sirviving a LITERAL EXTINCTION LEVEL CRISIS EVENT.
1 MayNotBeAPervert 2018-11-22
I think you are severally underestimating the level of commitment to 'inclusiveness' that has taken root in the west when it comes to immigration - here in Canada we just have two voices heard on in the media on this. One says to let them all in because it's humane, the other is arguing that we need them because Canadians don't breed enough and we will economically collapse if we don't grow population via immigration.
Yes, the west will toughen up on immigrants as climate change gets worse - you have a point there.
But my bet is that it won't be until it's way too late for any effective way to stop the in-flow - once a significant population has been imported, getting tougher on the borders will mean de-facto civil war. So first it will be 'we can't use lethal force because it's evil' and than it will be 'we can't use lethal force because it's evil AND a quarter of the country would see it as genocide aimed at them specifically, and the country would collapse in civil war'
And also, it's not like during all this there won't be a shit ton of other problems related to climate, straining things.
1 Time_to_Drink 2018-11-22
You can walk from India to Europe if you get really desperate....you don’t need a boat. People have been doing it for thousands of years. Same with Africa. It’s how we colonised the whole planet. If shit gets real there is always legs
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-22
Tell me more about Europe colonizing the world by walking.
1 Time_to_Drink 2018-11-22
Um, how do you think humans left Africa in the first place? A380'S?
1 trilateral1 2018-11-22
this is exactly why we need to implement effective border protection now, rather than wait until it's too late.
In hindsight Merkel's refusal to control the German borders in 2015, as well as the EU leadership's longstanding refusal to protect the EU's borders, might have caused the wake up call we need to prepare for the fifty times larger migration pressure in 2030.
Kinda like an attenuated vaccine.
1 Redactor0 2018-11-22
🙄🙄🙄
1 MeagerMistake23 2018-11-22
> pretending to not understand how to read charts
1 jubbergun 2018-11-22
Most of it is uninhabitable now, but that has less to do with climate and more to do with who is running the place.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-11-22
Yikes, someone watched too many disaster movies...
1 MeagerMistake23 2018-11-22
Maybe pull your head out of your ass and pay attention to what's already happening.
It's going to get much, much worse. (2 years old already)
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-11-22
Your comments even read like a stupid movie trailer jesus...
1 MeagerMistake23 2018-11-22
In case you haven't noticed, California looks like a disaster movie right now.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-11-22
1 MeagerMistake23 2018-11-22
Go read the damn UN report yourself, then. Shit's already getting bad and going to get worse.
1 Oh_hamburgers_ 2018-11-22
Lol come on let's be serious here, if it came down to war the West could annihilate the globe solo.
1 IamSwedishSuckMyNuts 2018-11-22
Imagine writing this and not thinking of America.
Never mind, that's actually a good argument against.
1 Jas0nJewnova 2018-11-22
I'm putting my name down for border machine gunner
1 ObsessedAussie 2018-11-22
Border rocket launcherer signing in
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
me on the nukes, can i bring my dogs to work
1 tcpip4lyfe 2018-11-22
Sounds like your guys' problem. I'll be dead.
1 Time_to_Drink 2018-11-22
Die faster
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-22
Listen here motherfucker. You will learn the hard way since the easy way isn't good enough.
1 calciu 2018-11-22
Do you know where you are? Are you retarded?
1 imstartingtogetangry 2018-11-22
You realize people can be killed, don't you?
1 -Shank- 2018-11-22
420D Parcheesi
1 MG87 2018-11-22
"WTF I LOVE HILLARY NOW?"- the_Dumbass
1 lightpath7 2018-11-22
Nothing is more despicable than someone who reverses themselves on long standing beliefs. Like it or not, i'll respect you more if you stay linear even if I don't agree with you. Her opinions are just whatever is most popular by whatever metrics they use that day.,aka gay marriage aka illegal migration.
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
What if her long standing beliefs were actually bending whichever way all along
1 shallowm 2018-11-22
Former ISIS fighter: islam gay
You: REEE WHY DID YOU STOP BEHEADING AND RAPING PEOPLE???
1 anonymous93 2018-11-22
Baste and zogwilled
1 Chicup 2018-11-22
She is just posing for 2020. Her opinions are just whatever is most popular by whatever metrics they use.
1 RochelleH 2018-11-22
Plus she wouldn't dare to say it about the U.S. She's saying it from the safe distance of commenting on another region/country's politics.
1 seoulsun 2018-11-22
wtf I love Hillary Rodham Clinton now?
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-11-22
Yo pizza, riddle me this shit man?
1 oddomata 2018-11-22
“I support every policy mommy ever has or will proposed.” - /u/IDFSHILL, 2016
1 Sniffposter30 2018-11-22
chapo is totally not mad
1 ParagonRenegade 2018-11-22
Why would we be mad at our previous judgements being entirely validated lol
1 jubbergun 2018-11-22
Because it's one of the three emotional settings you retards have and appears to be the default setting. I mean, most of you are mildly seething all the time due to being butthurt that no one buys your revisionist version of history and remembers just how terribly your chosen sociopolitical system has performed, reject it, and laugh at you for being the modern useful idiots who say, "it can work this time."
1 ParagonRenegade 2018-11-22
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ss2hULhXf04
1 jubbergun 2018-11-22
Ah, you're right. Those were some awfully big words for someone of your diminished intellectual capacity. I'll edit my comment.
1 ParagonRenegade 2018-11-22
Sorry, I only speak to sailors.
1 jubbergun 2018-11-22
Jokes on you, I was in the Navy for eight years.
1 ParagonRenegade 2018-11-22
That would explain the room temperature IQ and terrible opinions.
1 jubbergun 2018-11-22
I said I was in the Navy, not that I was a Chapofag.
1 ParagonRenegade 2018-11-22
"no u r" is weak as fuck
Much like your political alignment
1 jubbergun 2018-11-22
Still stronger than your average Chapofag. When people say "don't skip leg day" you motherfuckers think someone's frying chicken.
1 gumble212 2018-11-22
you have to go back...
1 ParagonRenegade 2018-11-22
true it's so much better there
1 CrosbyStillzandSwag 2018-11-22
What is compromise even?
1 Sasukefan99 2018-11-22
I can't see how this could possibly go wrong
1 Oh_hamburgers_ 2018-11-22
Hilldawg 2020
1 Raven0520 2018-11-22
Is anyone as universally despised by the modern left as Tony Blair?
1 POST_BUSSY 2018-11-22
Jeremy Corbyn
1 Artheniix 2018-11-22
Hillary herself?
1 King_Drumpf 2018-11-22
r/politics users on suicide watch.
1 IamSwedishSuckMyNuts 2018-11-22
Bruh, politics HATED Hillbro up untill Trump won. Then they suddenly had buyers remorse.
1 jubbergun 2018-11-22
No, then Shareblue and some other astroturf organizations took over the sub. Not even regular Reddit users are as retarded as the shills in /r/politics.
1 IamSwedishSuckMyNuts 2018-11-22
​
>>Shill for election candidate. Election is over.
​
Good brain mister very genious
1 jubbergun 2018-11-22
The last two presidential administrations should have taught you that we now live in an age where the election is never over. Trump and Obama spent more time fundraising and holding rallies than any presidents before them.
1 IamSwedishSuckMyNuts 2018-11-22
​
Exactly how caucasian are you?
1 jubbergun 2018-11-22
Not very. When the revolution comes and they kill all the Mayos I'll be able to pass as some kind of beaner so long as my Spanish is good.
1 IamSwedishSuckMyNuts 2018-11-22
You do realise their questioning technique is asking if Bernie should've won, and upon hearing your autistic schreeeching just open fire?
1 jubbergun 2018-11-22
I've already practiced for the all the obvious traps they'll use to root me out. The correct answer to "Should Bernie have won?" is, of course, "Bernie quien?"
1 WouldBernieHaveWon 2018-11-22
"I condemn any and all forms of violence. But…" -- Bernie Sanders
1 xu85 2018-11-22
https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/controversial/?sort=controversial&t=day
1 skidmarklicker 2018-11-22
THE ALGORITHM SAYS: PUBLIC NO LONGER SUPPORTS MASS MIGRATION INTO EUROPE
ADJUSTING POSITION
1 ObsessedAussie 2018-11-22
FIRMWARE UPDATED
1 Phantom_Engineer 2018-11-22
Did the public ever support it? At best they tolerated it.
1 nomad1c 2018-11-22
check out the UKpol thread. there's plenty of people who masturbate over immigration
1 Trannypostingaccount 2018-11-22
That's like asking /r/politics if cuckoldry was the default way to experience sexual encounters.
1 gilmore606 2018-11-22
in a representative democracy isn't that what we would want? politicians who change their views to represent those of their constituents?
1 seenten 2018-11-22
In a serious sense of course, but there's more drama when they don't
1 dramasexual 2018-11-22
This is a surprisingly reasonable and sane take by mommy right up until she pivots into "these rightoids just HATE FREEDOM because they're WEAK."
1 SRSLovesGawker 2018-11-22
Funny, this is pretty much exactly what's been said about the regressive left for years now.
1 PeskyPapaya 2018-11-22
Because rightoids project better than imax realD 3D
1 SRSLovesGawker 2018-11-22
That'd be useful information, if it was only the rightoids saying it.
1 mcslibbin 2018-11-22
if it *were
1 SRSLovesGawker 2018-11-22
I'm giving you an upvote, but only because I want to reinforce your bad behaviour. <3
1 madvillainer 2018-11-22
it's over for r/politicscels
1 lucajones88 2018-11-22
Only thing she’s ever said that I agree with tbh
1 Watermark03 2018-11-22
What a cuck
1 Kat_B0T 2018-11-22
Such ignorance from mommy! Unchecked immigration/mass importation of people that don’t share western values is quite literally our greatest strength.
1 questionasky 2018-11-22
This sub rules
1 Cauchemar89 2018-11-22
Does she indirectly blame Europe now that she lost against the Cheeto?