I can only confidently guarantee that the prostitute you end up making tender love to (lol) will shower longer than she usually does after your 5 shameful minutes of disappointing her
The "covering for pedos" directly stems from experiences that he faced when he was younger. And as I don't really agree with his stance calling him an arrogant retard and wanting to see him "go under" for having a different view than yours is what is actually disgusting.
When did society turn certain opinions into the "right opinions" to have and start shunning people that thought differently without understanding why they think differently?
But no ones said anything besides the pedophile comment to explain to me why he's so bad. And the pedophile argument isn't a really good one. It seems to me people don't like some things he has said and then jump with joy at any sign of trouble for him. Which doesn't seem helpful for anyone.
That.. Doesn't mean anything though. He obviously knows more about the situation than we do. That is not a good reason at all. And certainly not a good reason for wanting him to "go down."
That still doesn't mean anything. If it did, this would've been a bigger problem than it ended up being. But instead, all that happened is that he received backlash and resigned from Breitbart. He even publicly stated that his phrasing was sloppy.
We live in America. We do not virtually crucify people without evidence. What happened to innocent until proven guilty? It seems that these days people are guilty until proven innocent. And even they aren't treated the same after being proven innocent. This is ridiculous!
I'm pretty sure saying you've witnessed pedophilia and then refusing to name names of the perpetrators is an objectively bad thing.
Sure, and I would agree. But do we know the whole story? Why won't he say exactly? Is there something that he knows that we don't? Obviously with the knowledge that we know it's easy to condemn him.
But with all that being said, there's plenty of people I don't like and think are morons but I would never wish any sort of harm upon them. I only wish they would understand why they're wrong, or why others think they're wrong. I don't understand this mentality that people have these days where if you have a differing opinion on anything people wish terrible things upon you.
He was pretty clear in what he said; he saw widespread pedophillia, and refuses to name the culprits.
Okay.... So again.. Why? Was something else going on behind the scenes?
If you shelter pedos you deserve to have your business go under. Keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out.
He was sheltering pedophiles too? Or are you talking about not saying who he saw was committing the pedophilia? Because sheltering and covering are two different things.
Yes, but there are different versions of it. For example, in this argument, we brought up that he has refused to name potential pedophiles that he was witnessed and you used "shelter" to describe him not publicly stating the pedophiles.
Does that just mean that he's not telling everyone who these potential pedophiles are or is he physically sheltering them. Using cover in this situation would definitely be taken a different way than using shelter.
But this is all silly, the real argument is what's important not word-play.
Lmao, stop being morally outraged. The guy made a living laughing and making fun of other people's misfortune. I wouldn't wish this on him, but it happened and all I will do is point and laugh.
Also he started a charity to put white males into college and pocketed the money. He's a grifter and the grift is over.
How has he made a living from laughing and making fun of others misfortune?
Why is it bad making a charity for putting white males in college? There's plenty of that for women and other minorities? In fact, they receive plenty of special attention.
When did society turn certain opinions into the "right opinions" to have and start shunning people that thought differently without understanding why they think differently?
67 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-12-02
I can only confidently guarantee that the prostitute you end up making tender love to (lol) will shower longer than she usually does after your 5 shameful minutes of disappointing her
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 2odastream 2018-12-02
It's always time to laugh at Milo Crobobolis.
1 SpotNL 2018-12-02
Yeah, but I forgot all about him for a while. Glad he's still doing his thing.
1 better_bot 2018-12-02
He's gonna be rooming with Baked Alaska by next year.
1 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2018-12-02
*Maced Alaska
1 better_bot 2018-12-02
ðŸ˜
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
It's so fucking fun seeing him nowadays; he still hasn't realized he's lost all respect from non-pedos.
1 ALoudMouthBaby 2018-12-02
Who?
1 LightUmbra 2018-12-02
You really are a little baby
1 shaneoffline 2018-12-02
Poor Milo
1 LeBronJamesFuckMe 2018-12-02
Fag
1 POST_BUSSY 2018-12-02
Lmao, Milo's response
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2018-12-02
Every time 😆
1 POST_BUSSY 2018-12-02
🤣
1 SamWhite 2018-12-02
Fuck me, I still fall for that.
1 [deleted] 2018-12-02
[removed]
1 xu85 2018-12-02
we srd now 😂
1 ComedicSans 2018-12-02
We interrupt your scheduled broadcasting for a special announcement from Milo's sponsor, /r/watchpeopldie
1 slaytina44 2018-12-02
He truly believed he was unstoppable
1 JackRipener 2018-12-02
Someone tldr please I have autism
1 SpotNL 2018-12-02
Tl;dr milo broke as hell
1 wisty 2018-12-02
So if I'm reading this right, he owes Bokhari over $76k, but he's considered low priority.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-12-02
Maybe that guy doesn't collect his debts as aggressively as others. The law firms and credit card company will absolutely fuck his shit up.
1 Inceltiers 2018-12-02
Disappointed he didn’t turn into a commie before he offs himself
1 Gazkhuul 2018-12-02
I don't get it. He's bad with money and owes a lot? He's certainly not the first. Am I missing something?
1 FrankPapageorgio 2018-12-02
It's nice seeing assholes like this be fucking broke, and to know that they are not making bank off of all their racist bullshit that they spew.
1 Gazkhuul 2018-12-02
Racist bullshit?
What has he exactly said or done that is racist that wasn't taken out of context?
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
He has done nothing racist, but he has admitted to seeing pedophilia other than his own abuse and refused to name names.
1 memoryplays 2018-12-02
yeah it's kind of a stretch to call him a racist. he even said he preferred to date black men
1 Inceltiers 2018-12-02
Lmao buthurt chapstick
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
He's nto a racist, but he does cover for pedos, which is much worse.
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
He's an arrogant retard who admitted to covering for pedos, so lot sof people want to see him die.
1 Gazkhuul 2018-12-02
The "covering for pedos" directly stems from experiences that he faced when he was younger. And as I don't really agree with his stance calling him an arrogant retard and wanting to see him "go under" for having a different view than yours is what is actually disgusting.
When did society turn certain opinions into the "right opinions" to have and start shunning people that thought differently without understanding why they think differently?
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
Sorry, I accidentally deleted the comment. Here's the text reproduced form memory.
1 Gazkhuul 2018-12-02
"He's an arrogant retard who admitted to covering for pedos, so lots of people want to see him die."
Was the original comment.
You then changed "die" to "go under."
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
I wrote it and realized it could be read the wrong way; I meant die as in go broke, business fail, etc etc.
1 Gazkhuul 2018-12-02
Well, that's a mighty big difference in words then. Sounds like you're just covering a comment you knew you were wrong in stating.
But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say it was sincere.
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
Bhaijan, do you think I actually want him to die?
1 Gazkhuul 2018-12-02
Not necessarily, but I don't think you want him to change his ways. I think you want him to pay for things you think he should pay for.
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
I do want him to change his ways; I'm just saying, it's understandable why I and others like this news.
1 Gazkhuul 2018-12-02
But no ones said anything besides the pedophile comment to explain to me why he's so bad. And the pedophile argument isn't a really good one. It seems to me people don't like some things he has said and then jump with joy at any sign of trouble for him. Which doesn't seem helpful for anyone.
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
He mentioned on a podcast that he had witnessed pedophilia.
He has so far not named the pedophiles.
This is a pretty compelling reason.
1 Gazkhuul 2018-12-02
That.. Doesn't mean anything though. He obviously knows more about the situation than we do. That is not a good reason at all. And certainly not a good reason for wanting him to "go down."
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
He literally said he'd seen pedophilia, but has refused to name the perpetrators. Ergo, he is protecting the perpetrators.
1 Gazkhuul 2018-12-02
That still doesn't mean anything. If it did, this would've been a bigger problem than it ended up being. But instead, all that happened is that he received backlash and resigned from Breitbart. He even publicly stated that his phrasing was sloppy.
We live in America. We do not virtually crucify people without evidence. What happened to innocent until proven guilty? It seems that these days people are guilty until proven innocent. And even they aren't treated the same after being proven innocent. This is ridiculous!
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
He literally admitted this, word for word. You are intentionally ignoring all evidence to protect your hero.
He literally said he has witnessed pedoophillia, and has not named the eprpetrators.
1 recriminology 2018-12-02
please never stop, this is fucking amazing
1 Gazkhuul 2018-12-02
Sure, and I would agree. But do we know the whole story? Why won't he say exactly? Is there something that he knows that we don't? Obviously with the knowledge that we know it's easy to condemn him.
But with all that being said, there's plenty of people I don't like and think are morons but I would never wish any sort of harm upon them. I only wish they would understand why they're wrong, or why others think they're wrong. I don't understand this mentality that people have these days where if you have a differing opinion on anything people wish terrible things upon you.
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
He was pretty clear in what he said; he saw widespread pedophillia, and refuses to name the culprits.
If you shelter pedos you deserve to have your business go under. Keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out.
1 Gazkhuul 2018-12-02
Okay.... So again.. Why? Was something else going on behind the scenes?
He was sheltering pedophiles too? Or are you talking about not saying who he saw was committing the pedophilia? Because sheltering and covering are two different things.
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
Yes, that is sheltering pedos.You can find evidence of such usage here. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/shelter
1 Gazkhuul 2018-12-02
"Shelter," can be taken multiple ways. Covering for would be a better word that won't be misinterpreted
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
Anybody with an IQ above room temperature knows that sheltering means protecting in context, and that this is a very common usage.
Covering can mean physically covering them, should I sue a different word?
1 Gazkhuul 2018-12-02
Yes, but there are different versions of it. For example, in this argument, we brought up that he has refused to name potential pedophiles that he was witnessed and you used "shelter" to describe him not publicly stating the pedophiles.
Does that just mean that he's not telling everyone who these potential pedophiles are or is he physically sheltering them. Using cover in this situation would definitely be taken a different way than using shelter.
But this is all silly, the real argument is what's important not word-play.
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-02
Acknowledging you're beign a retarded doesn't absolve you of retardation.
Literally everybody not bornwith an extra Y would understand the first
1 SpotNL 2018-12-02
Lmao, stop being morally outraged. The guy made a living laughing and making fun of other people's misfortune. I wouldn't wish this on him, but it happened and all I will do is point and laugh.
Also he started a charity to put white males into college and pocketed the money. He's a grifter and the grift is over.
1 Gazkhuul 2018-12-02
How has he made a living from laughing and making fun of others misfortune?
Why is it bad making a charity for putting white males in college? There's plenty of that for women and other minorities? In fact, they receive plenty of special attention.
1 SpotNL 2018-12-02
Read before your sperg, pls. Did you miss the part where he pocketed the money? Was over 100k too.
Also LOL
1 HeftyHovercraft 2018-12-02
Bro did you not read the part where he didn't put any white males in college and actually pocketed the money?
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2018-12-02
PEDO DEFENSE FORCE ASSEMBLE@@
1 PeskyPapaya 2018-12-02
Literally forever man
1 wisty 2018-12-02
Or it's mostly bullshit he made up to sound edgy.
1 GARBAGE_MACHINE 2018-12-02
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/458811893449117696/PgPopg33.jpeg
1 trump_pushes_mongo 2018-12-02
Who?
1 memoryplays 2018-12-02
lol and the dude plugs his stupid t shirts
1 youcanteatbullets 2018-12-02
But then the SJWs win!
1 Wjjm75 2018-12-02
Globalist pig