I ordered a shit dildo using Google+. When it first came out, you had to sign up with G+ in order to get the discount. It was supposed to smell and feel like a shit. Was pretty underhelming when it arrived, because it only looked like a shit. It didn't even feel like a shit when it went in my boipussy.
Needless to say, I don't use it anymore.
The one upside was that the shit dildo was password protected, so no one else could use it.
I did a research paper this summer on this subreddit and there was a published study that found that 74% of attacks on Reddit came from 1% of source subreddits. I assume that subs like r/Drama are the 1%.
So it's better to elect a corrupt literal retards who uses his position to stoke division and hatred to temporarily protect themselves, because they eventually will get caught? I can get behind this I guess, like turning a light on and seeing roaches scatter?
I'm going to serious post for a minute so fucking deal with it.
Sure.
For example, there is open air slave trading going on in Libya just outside of Tripoli. You can watch the videos of it on youtube. Hell, even CNN sent a reporter there to go to one of the auctions. The reason that this is going on is because of the actions taken by Obama as President, and Clinton (Hillary) as the head State Department. Regardless of whether or not these are unintended consequences of overthrowing Gadaffi, the responsibility lies at the feet of those who fucked up. No one's talking about it in these terms though.
Meanwhile, we have a retard in office who can't so much as fart without a legion of "reporters" offering guesses at what gross thing he ate that would cause him to do something as unpresidential and treasonous as farting.
Granted, he's almost definitely done something wrong. I think it's going to be great that we're setting the precedent that a sitting president can be punished for breaking the law and hopefully sent to jail, and I cannot wait until this blows up in the faces of the corrupt assholes who are so butthurt over losing to a retard that they aren't paying attention while they sign their own death warrants.
I dont think electing an actual retard is going to hurt or even hamper the systemic shit that leads to the sort of fuckery you reference. Any action taken by an American leader can be blamed for various atrocities, and we can only guess what could've resulted if they hadn't or taken another course of action - it's not really fair imho to pin it on an individual in these cases. It's always kinda guaranteed to lead to some sort of bullshit, I'd rather keep trying to be better and elect people who seem to understand the real world and consequences. That being said, I can sympathesize with wanting to show the nakedness of the emperor I guess
Personally I believe in holding people accountable, but if you don't then that's fine.
The fact of the matter is that Nixon's pardon has been used as a precedent when it comes to holding high ranking politicians accountable for their crimes and Trump is the best shot I've seen in my lifetime of overturning that precedent.
How can you possibly hold a president accountable for the geopoltical effects of their policies - even if that is the correct ethical position, the presidency would become an actual untenable position. The fact is they make or are accountable for decisions that lead to things that are unknowable at the time, and we might as well lock them all up before they take office (or make an agreement theyll go to prison after their term, which inevitably leads to negative shit because of the position they decide from).
I do believe in holding people accountable, but not for ripple effect of geopolitical policy (other than voting). Whereas obvious norm and law breaking I'm all for seeing justice served. I actually doubt well see it in trump's case, but at least hopefully well see some laws passed that prevent the obvious infractions from happening again, those which our constitution and laws were unprepared for because of "norms" which obviously dont mean shit
How can you possibly hold a president accountable for the geopoltical effects of their policies
Like this. I'm doing it right now.
I think you'd have a stronger point if they tried to fix the situation they created or if they even talked about it. The whole ignore it and walk away strategy doesn't really warm my heart to them.
Vote for, yes ofc I'm not retarded. But fuck, hell no, Daddy Trump is the only flabby alpha I'd ever allow in my swamps. I hope he replies to my twitter DMs soon or idk what I'll do
25 comments
1 BussyShillBot 2018-12-08
I ordered a shit dildo using Google+. When it first came out, you had to sign up with G+ in order to get the discount. It was supposed to smell and feel like a shit. Was pretty underhelming when it arrived, because it only looked like a shit. It didn't even feel like a shit when it went in my boipussy.
Needless to say, I don't use it anymore.
The one upside was that the shit dildo was password protected, so no one else could use it.
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 SnapshillBot 2018-12-08
I did a research paper this summer on this subreddit and there was a published study that found that 74% of attacks on Reddit came from 1% of source subreddits. I assume that subs like r/Drama are the 1%.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 soupvsjonez 2018-12-08
have you seen the alternative?
1 LadyVetinari 2018-12-08
What's the alternative?
1 soupvsjonez 2018-12-08
Competent corrupt people.
1 LadyVetinari 2018-12-08
So you're saying an incompetent corrupt tard is preferable against a competent corrupt politician?
1 soupvsjonez 2018-12-08
Yes. No question. Competent corrupt people get away with their corruption.
1 LadyVetinari 2018-12-08
So it's better to elect a corrupt literal retards who uses his position to stoke division and hatred to temporarily protect themselves, because they eventually will get caught? I can get behind this I guess, like turning a light on and seeing roaches scatter?
1 soupvsjonez 2018-12-08
I'm going to serious post for a minute so fucking deal with it.
Sure.
For example, there is open air slave trading going on in Libya just outside of Tripoli. You can watch the videos of it on youtube. Hell, even CNN sent a reporter there to go to one of the auctions. The reason that this is going on is because of the actions taken by Obama as President, and Clinton (Hillary) as the head State Department. Regardless of whether or not these are unintended consequences of overthrowing Gadaffi, the responsibility lies at the feet of those who fucked up. No one's talking about it in these terms though.
Meanwhile, we have a retard in office who can't so much as fart without a legion of "reporters" offering guesses at what gross thing he ate that would cause him to do something as unpresidential and treasonous as farting.
Granted, he's almost definitely done something wrong. I think it's going to be great that we're setting the precedent that a sitting president can be punished for breaking the law and hopefully sent to jail, and I cannot wait until this blows up in the faces of the corrupt assholes who are so butthurt over losing to a retard that they aren't paying attention while they sign their own death warrants.
1 LadyVetinari 2018-12-08
I dont think electing an actual retard is going to hurt or even hamper the systemic shit that leads to the sort of fuckery you reference. Any action taken by an American leader can be blamed for various atrocities, and we can only guess what could've resulted if they hadn't or taken another course of action - it's not really fair imho to pin it on an individual in these cases. It's always kinda guaranteed to lead to some sort of bullshit, I'd rather keep trying to be better and elect people who seem to understand the real world and consequences. That being said, I can sympathesize with wanting to show the nakedness of the emperor I guess
1 soupvsjonez 2018-12-08
Personally I believe in holding people accountable, but if you don't then that's fine.
The fact of the matter is that Nixon's pardon has been used as a precedent when it comes to holding high ranking politicians accountable for their crimes and Trump is the best shot I've seen in my lifetime of overturning that precedent.
1 LadyVetinari 2018-12-08
How can you possibly hold a president accountable for the geopoltical effects of their policies - even if that is the correct ethical position, the presidency would become an actual untenable position. The fact is they make or are accountable for decisions that lead to things that are unknowable at the time, and we might as well lock them all up before they take office (or make an agreement theyll go to prison after their term, which inevitably leads to negative shit because of the position they decide from).
I do believe in holding people accountable, but not for ripple effect of geopolitical policy (other than voting). Whereas obvious norm and law breaking I'm all for seeing justice served. I actually doubt well see it in trump's case, but at least hopefully well see some laws passed that prevent the obvious infractions from happening again, those which our constitution and laws were unprepared for because of "norms" which obviously dont mean shit
1 soupvsjonez 2018-12-08
Like this. I'm doing it right now.
I think you'd have a stronger point if they tried to fix the situation they created or if they even talked about it. The whole ignore it and walk away strategy doesn't really warm my heart to them.
1 dudeWares 2018-12-08
Man who married his middle school teacher, dykes, manlets, Pooh, jungle Hitler, commie spics, Trudeau
1 LadyVetinari 2018-12-08
Are you trying to list better alternatives? Because you are
1 dudeWares 2018-12-08
You'd really vote for a manlet over Trump?
1 LadyVetinari 2018-12-08
Vote for, yes ofc I'm not retarded. But fuck, hell no, Daddy Trump is the only flabby alpha I'd ever allow in my swamps. I hope he replies to my twitter DMs soon or idk what I'll do
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-12-08
The choice is obvious
1 dudeWares 2018-12-08
Yikes Ed...
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-12-08
That choice being
1 JayBaumanManhole 2018-12-08
It's over for 6'2-cels
1 MexicanEmboar 2018-12-08
Imagine actually thinking AOC is bad
1 dudeWares 2018-12-08
I was referring to world leaders you retard, AOC is bad and not even old enough to be president
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-12-08
to own the libs, obviously
1 Cho-Dai 2018-12-08
I love how "Umadbro?" is now a mainstream political ideology.