They don't believe in hiring quotas nor in government-financed recreational abortions, so of course they are fascists. This is just like in The Handmaid's Tale.
How is explaining von Mises' opinion on fascism = supporting fascism?
I'm too lazy to delve into the accusations against rightc0ast right now, maybe another time. But there's a lot of jilted socialists who want to see his head on a spike, so I'd take all of the accusations with a big load of salt.
it's full of liberals, so no thanks. also, unlike r/libertarian, this isnt a safe space where youll be sheltered from hurty left-wing opinions, deal with it
Are you lying right now or have you been brainwashed like so many others by only having seen half the quote and not hearing the context?
Mises is an anti-socialist in 1927 Vienna, fascism is on the the opposing the growing socialist influence in Europe, and this is before WWII, before the Nazis became evil incarnate. Sure looking back we all know the fascists were evil from the beginning, but this was not obvious in those days. Judging this quote therefore as if he knew the future is ridiculous.
The passage from Mises as selectively quoted:
It cannot be denied that Fascism and similar movements aimed at the establishment of dictatorships are full of the best intentions and that their intervention has for the moment saved European civilization. The merit that Fascism has thereby won for itself will live on eternally in history.
Mises’s actual conclusion:
But though its policy has brought salvation for the moment, it is not of the kind which could promise continued success. Fascism was an emergency makeshift. To view it as something more would be a fatal error.
Mises opposed fascism too. He only praises it for keeping Europe from going socialist in that period, not for anything else.
It should also be noted that Mises was a Jew and was hunted by the Nazis and barely escaped Europe at the last minute.
anyone who identifies as "anti-socialist" is a fascist, yes, because liberalism is not a functional political system and any liberal government eventually has to ally with either socialism or fascism to sustain itself. if you explicitly rule out allegiance with socialism that only leaves one option, and is a dead giveaway to what libidinal impulses are really guiding you.
It's all about the health benefits of the fetal stem cells. For an optimal rejuvenation effect, planned parenthood recommends semi-annual pregnancies terminated after about four months.
None of the principles of libertarianism state that you have unlimited free speech everywhere you go. E.g.: You can't put a sign in my yard and start screeching about free speech when I remove it.
Last I checked, the left; and Reddit, agreed that moderators effectively "own" their subreddits. So it's their community with their rules. Don't like it, go make your own community. With it's rules.
Last I checked, the left; and Reddit, agreed that moderators effectively "own" their subreddits.
So your response to "leftists" turning their subs into authoritarian shitholes (citation needed because plently of right wing subs do the same shit) is to do the exact same thing back? Way to destroy your principles to own the libs
Yeah you were citing property rights as a justification for /libertarian to go full authoritarian shithole. I igored that part because it is a complete non sequitur. A subreddit is not anybody's "property" as nobody owns it. Mods are janitors that keep out spammers and illegal content, they don't own the sub.
I just think it's hilarious that you guys are rolling over to a mod team filled with self admitted fascists to own the 5 libs that visit your sub. It's really the fate of all right libertarians to spread their cheeks for their fascist brethren.
They didn't though. The rules are pretty much the same as every other subreddit. Don't be an asshole, don't troll, stay on tropic. If that's too difficult to follow than it's good that they'll ban you lol.
If it's not an authoritarian shithole then why have they brought on openly fascist mods and gotten rid of the public mod logs? It's now forbidden to criticize the mod team and their definitions of (concern)trolling are so vague that they can be stretched to ban anyone who engages in wrongthink.
No it isn't. It's against the rules to just spat at insults against them. If all you do is screech and call them fascists with no substance, then yeah, you've broken the golden rule, get banned.
Lol I barely ever call people fascist because I still think that word has meaning. Take a look at where your new mods post the most and then tell me that they don't have strong authoritarian leanings. Enjoy your sub turning into an echo chamber. I hope it was worth it to keep the Chapotards out.
Lol I barely ever call people fascist because I still think that word has meaning. Take a look at where your new mods post the most and then tell me that they don't have strong authoritarian leanings.
Where they post is irrelevant. That's poisoning the well fallacy.
But what the fuck, let's take a look at their post history:
avengingturnip posts the most in EndlessWar, a subreddit all about the endless war that the US (and it's allies) seem to get into. As we all know, Fascists are peace loving people who hate war. 🙄
Next big subreddits for this guy are a bunch of Catholic subreddits (all Christians are Nazi's of course, THATS A FACT) /r/Libertarian (the fascist subreddit in question) and /r/DescentIntoTyranny (because fascists hate Tyranny).
Hayeku posts the most in /r/Libertarian (the fascist subreddit in question), /r/Economics (because only a fascist would use money...), and /r/politics. Ok that last one actually makes sense, he's DEFINITELY a fascist.
Z3F posts a bunch in /r/T_D (again, we all know the well is poisoned there so fascist #1!), a hell of a lot of NSFW subreddits (So he's a horny fascist, I wont judge), He ALSO posts a lot in /r/GifRecipes! (COMRADE STALIN ONLY EDITED STILL IMAGES! MOVING IMAGES ARE A FASCIST PLOT!)
JobDestroyer posts a lot in /r/GoldandBlack (a ancap subreddit, ONLY FASCISTS WANT NO GOVERNMENT!), /r/FuckTheAlt which dislikes both the "alt-left" and "alt-right" (ONLY A TRUE FASCIST HAS THIS TYPE OF SELF HATE!), /r/QualitySocialism (only fascists dislike socialism, you are either with socialism or you're a fascist!).
nixfu is active in fascist subreddits like /r/Libertarian (the fascist subreddit in question), /r/conspiracy (anyone who questions the government is a fascist), /r/Conservative and /r/T_D (Again, anyone I disagree with is a fascist, even the moderates in T_D).
austrian_economics posts the most in /r/Anarcho_Capitalism (a ancap subreddit, ONLY FASCISTS WANT NO GOVERNMENT!), /r/privacy (Only fascists want privacy, the state should see all), /r/whowillbuildtheroads (only fascists meme).
So yeah, sorry but I DO NOT SEE WHAT YOU SEE. The places they post the most seem to match what I'd expect from /r/libertarian moderators.
I didn't know that people who are actively involved in a personality cult surrounding the president of the United States are the ideal libertarians. You have 2 of those, along with an obvious sock puppet account (hayeku). More to the point though is that adding 7 mods of dubious provenance in one fell swoop smacks of a blatant takeover by right Libertarians. Do you have a single left libertarian on that mod team? Nope! Time to ban all the wrongthink left libertarians to make the sub into another circlejerk echo chamber where none of your ideas are challenged.
There are lots of reasons to keep it private. They don't want to deal with the constant wet blankets whining about every little thing, they don't want people trying to bypass their bans, etc...
As for the real reason to keep it private, you'd have to ask them. I honestly don't care if it's private or public. It has no bearing on anything really.
Yeah, I've argued with subscribers there that didn't want me commenting because I'm a liberal, that based on the sidebar I have as much right to comment there as anyone else. If the mods decide to ban me, well it's their sub.
It's disappointing to me but I can sorta see their issue. CTH has made a coordinated effort to continually disrupt the sub with bad faith trolling.
Yeah, I've argued with subscribers there that didn't want me commenting because I'm a liberal, that based on the sidebar I have as much right to comment there as anyone else. If the mods decide to ban me, well it's their sub.
It's disappointing to me but I can sorta see their issue. CTH has made a coordinated effort to continually disrupt the sub with bad faith trolling.
You're getting punished for sullying my yard with your speech. Just like how people normally sully /r/libertarian. Now it's finally getting cleaned up.
Let's modify the argument a little: let's say that I say that the public is allowed to post signs in my yard under a set of rules, with one of the rules being that I'll take them down if they violate the rules.. I go out in my yard in the morning and there's signs that break my rules, so I take them down. You're the one who put it up and you come stand in my yard and screech about free speech.
let's say that I say that the public is allowed to post signs in my yard under a set of rules, with one of the rules being that I'll take them down if they violate the rules..
You won't.
I go out in my yard in the morning and there's signs that break my rules, so I fuck them publicly. You're the one who put it up and you come stand in my yard and screech about free speech.
I mean you're getting a lot of flak for this but the idea that you could have a community without a strong centralised government ruling it and people would chose to act in a manner that respected each other is ridiculous.
For a group so worried about brigadiers you guys sure are happy to come correct the record over here. But unlike r/libertarian we welcome you guys to come make a stink over here. The only rule you must follow is to post bussy so get your camera out friend.
I am not worried about brigades at all. I do not think anyone should be banned just because they belong to certain other subs. I believe this is the death of what made the sub great and I expect to be banned within the hour for stating just that (which is now against the rules). Fuck the mods.
I have been a long time user of the sub and don't really go to other political subs because they are all garbage. I have just been banned because I criticized these rules. Some of these mods are LITERAL fascists, there is no way these rules aren't used to censor people. (they already have been, the mods are banning people simply because they post to ChapoTrapHouse)
You're violating the rule against concern trolling. No real libertarian actually believes in liberty or free speech for those they disagree with, so stop speaking in bad faith as if they do.
Popper argues pretty strongly against this sort of heavy-handed authoritarianism. Everyone always focuses on the part where he argues a limit exists beyond which we don't need to tolerate intolerance, but ignores the part where he advocates keeping it in check through rational argument.
Here's the thing though, I have been a member of the community for a while and I am not one of the CTH trolls. I in fact do not like them one bit. But we prided ourselves on being an open sub that did not silence people for their political opinions, and the mods have ruined that in the span of a week.
Then you've taken pride in the wrong thing. /r/libertarian should be about libertarianism (hence the name). NOT about other ideologies. People complained about the low quality posts with all the memes that made it to the front page. Now it's usually just posts about socialism or how everything is fascist.
I'm glad they're cleaning up that shit whole. It started to mirror /r/politics WAAAY too much.
r/politics mods actively censor articles they don't like. It's ironic that you used that criticism because that is the road /r/Libertarian just started on.
I can never take a sub seriously when it starts to take aim at supposed "concern trolling". It's just a thinnly veiled way to shut down discussion with some they disagree with. I have honestly never heard anyone use it except some left-leaning subs. I hope these rules are a joke.
a sub with a topic like r/libertarian has to be kept on topic.
Does it? It operated perfectly fine for 10 years with basically no moderation. Ya there were trolls, but all they have are words, and that's the compromise you make for a free and open discussion.
r/libertarian should be a discussion about topics concerning things like government overreach, not a echo chamber. There are other sub reddits listed on the side-bar that are exclusively libertarians discussing those things. /r/Libertarian actually got to r/all many time with actual libertarian issuse, even if a decent amount of the comments weren't by libertarians, who cares? Now you get all libertarians and can circle jerk all together.
even if a decent amount of the comments weren't by libertarians, who cares?
I care. The reaction to this change in moderation policy has made it clear that r/Libertarian has spread rampant misinformation on what libertarianism is. Libertarianism is not a knee-jerk opposition to authority figures. Libertarianism is a right wring political philosophy based on private property rights. The vision of libertarianism spread by the old /r/Libertarian isn't something I want to see popularized. An "echo chamber" is exactly what's needed to correct this misconception.
An "echo chamber" is exactly what's needed to correct this misconception.
Are you genuinely retarded?
Libertarianism needing an echo chamber is as laughable as anarchism needing secret mod discussion and harsh rules about what is socially acceptable.
You know that doesn't speak to your knowledge of libertarianism, right? The LP is great, but it does not offer a consistent vision of libertarianism. Libertarianism as defined by the likes of Gary Johnson and Bill Weld is exactly what I take issue with.
oh great a, concern trolling rule! the broadest rule that got most people banned from /r/t_d and will allow mods to ban people who aren't 'true libertarians', which means people who don't worship Trump unconditionally
I still see a lot of posts on the front page with 300+ replies so its hardly committed suicide unless you are one of those people who will go "well, give it time, the sub will surely die soon" only for there to still be 300+ reply threads 3 months later and then you will surely say "well, give it time, the sub will surely die soon"
the people with candidates who think a car license is equivilant to needing a license for your toasters are now complaining that their mods are retarded.
I went on record saying that r/Libertarian is the only living political subreddit that doesn't have its head out its own ass. It just took one little Chapo shitposter to ruin it.
Understand that libertarianism isn't just anarchy. People can set rules if they want to in a subreddit. If we don't want you brigading and upvoting non-libertarian left wing nonsense, so be it.
Then you have see stupid threads like this one of people complaining about how they've been banned and they "barely" have any posts in r/chapotraphouse. Then you check their profile and there's quite a few posts to r/chapotraphouse in the past few months. Dig a bit deeper and you find out that he's actually a mod for r/libertarianuncensored and the sub has a bunch of posts upvoted about AOC and socialist economic policies.
Sorry, you wore out your welcome. If I can't try having a discussion about libertarianism without someone talking about muh roads, open borders, and how socialism actually isn't that bad, then its not actually a sub for libertarian discussion. Its more of what r/politics should actually be.
If I can't try having a discussion about libertarianism without someone talking about muh roads, open borders, and how socialism actually isn't that bad, then its not actually a sub for libertarian discussion.
If there's no counterpoint or debate, then its just a bunch of dudes jerking each other off and bitching about taxes. What a fucking stupid sub.
It’s funny how people want to come to the libertarian sub for discussion, but if you go to subs pertaining to their favored political ideology, you get banned for dissent. If I want to discuss libertarianism with other libertarians, that’s our business and not yours. Take your “open subs for thee, but not for me” nonsense and go screw.
201 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-12-08
We can submit quotes?
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 JoJoWiCo 2018-12-08
libertarianism and being co-opted by fascists
name a more iconic duo
1 TypicalLibertarian 2018-12-08
When the left censor: Private organizations have the right to censor, free speech only protects you from the government!
When the left IS censored: OMG YOU ARE LITERALLY A FASCIST! WHY DO YOU LOVE HITLER SO MUCH??!
1 nomad1c 2018-12-08
elaborate
1 ImJustaBagofHammers 2018-12-08
https://www.reddit.com/r/FULLCOMMUNISM/search?q=Quarantine&restrict_sr=on&include_over_18=on
1 modern_rabbit 2018-12-08
How much whiskey am I gonna need for this click?
1 ExilesReturn 2018-12-08
Better go ahead and go to the store friend.
1 ElonMuskar 2018-12-08
none if you arent a fucking degenerate
1 modern_rabbit 2018-12-08
Soooo, People's Vodka then.
1 ElonMuskar 2018-12-08
actually and unironically less degenerate
1 VapeOnYourNape 2018-12-08
anythings better than Manly Sugar Booze
1 JoJoWiCo 2018-12-08
so thats a no
1 trilateral1 2018-12-08
They don't believe in hiring quotas nor in government-financed recreational abortions, so of course they are fascists. This is just like in The Handmaid's Tale.
1 Codefuser 2018-12-08
Nah, just the mods supporting fascism and being a white nationalist
1 JoJoWiCo 2018-12-08
You can't just use facts in an argument with chronically aggrieved reactionaries. That's not fair!
1 trilateral1 2018-12-08
How is explaining von Mises' opinion on fascism = supporting fascism?
I'm too lazy to delve into the accusations against rightc0ast right now, maybe another time. But there's a lot of jilted socialists who want to see his head on a spike, so I'd take all of the accusations with a big load of salt.
1 2Potemkin2Village 2018-12-08
Why do you people never own up to who you are. It's so tedious. At least tankies admit that they're garbage.
1 Anen-o-me 2018-12-08
There's literally no way to honestly call Mises a fascist.
1 2Potemkin2Village 2018-12-08
Except that one quote where he said police should extrajudicially beat and or murder homeless people.
Next you'll be telling me Julius Evola isn't a fascist either.
1 Anen-o-me 2018-12-08
I'm not aware of any such quote. Link?
1 tarantula13 2018-12-08
Homeless aren't even really people :/
1 [deleted] 2018-12-08
[removed]
1 westofthetracks 2018-12-08
yeah, you cant just call the guy who thought fascism "saved european civilization" a fascist, thats absurd
christ you people are tiresome
1 trilateral1 2018-12-08
why don't you stay in chapotraphouse where you can circlejerk in peace?
1 westofthetracks 2018-12-08
it's full of liberals, so no thanks. also, unlike r/libertarian, this isnt a safe space where youll be sheltered from hurty left-wing opinions, deal with it
1 Anen-o-me 2018-12-08
Are you lying right now or have you been brainwashed like so many others by only having seen half the quote and not hearing the context?
Mises is an anti-socialist in 1927 Vienna, fascism is on the the opposing the growing socialist influence in Europe, and this is before WWII, before the Nazis became evil incarnate. Sure looking back we all know the fascists were evil from the beginning, but this was not obvious in those days. Judging this quote therefore as if he knew the future is ridiculous.
The passage from Mises as selectively quoted:
It cannot be denied that Fascism and similar movements aimed at the establishment of dictatorships are full of the best intentions and that their intervention has for the moment saved European civilization. The merit that Fascism has thereby won for itself will live on eternally in history.
Mises’s actual conclusion:
But though its policy has brought salvation for the moment, it is not of the kind which could promise continued success. Fascism was an emergency makeshift. To view it as something more would be a fatal error.
Mises opposed fascism too. He only praises it for keeping Europe from going socialist in that period, not for anything else.
It should also be noted that Mises was a Jew and was hunted by the Nazis and barely escaped Europe at the last minute.
https://mises.org/wire/mises-fascism-again
1 LongPostBot 2018-12-08
This is one of the worst post I have EVER seen. Delete it.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 westofthetracks 2018-12-08
yes, a fascist, like i said. thank you for admitting you were wrong
1 Anen-o-me 2018-12-08
No, a classical liberal. Are you defining all anti-socialists as fascists? Because that would be ridiculous.
1 westofthetracks 2018-12-08
lmfao
anyone who identifies as "anti-socialist" is a fascist, yes, because liberalism is not a functional political system and any liberal government eventually has to ally with either socialism or fascism to sustain itself. if you explicitly rule out allegiance with socialism that only leaves one option, and is a dead giveaway to what libidinal impulses are really guiding you.
1 Anen-o-me 2018-12-08
You're a bit insane, and supposing there are only two directions possible is literally stupid.
Ancaps represent a third direction, and it's an extremely viable one since it functions in proven market processes and principles.
Unlike socialism.
1 westofthetracks 2018-12-08
hahahah
hahahahahahahahahahahahahah
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-12-08
When do tankies ever admit to being horrible?
1 2Potemkin2Village 2018-12-08
They admit to being tankies which amounts to being horrible.
Most facists dance around their beliefs and pretend they aren't fash. It's annoying.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-12-08
I misunderstood you then.
1 Anen-o-me 2018-12-08
Pointing out that Mises wasn't a fascist isn't "supporting fascism."
1 the_popcorn_pisser 2018-12-08
Literally one mod lmao.
1 Unkill_is_dill 2018-12-08
Is it not?
1 dramasexual 2018-12-08
ok but who DOESN'T believe in government funded recreational abortions?
taking your family to the abortion park in the summer is a time-honored american tradition
1 trilateral1 2018-12-08
It's all about the health benefits of the fetal stem cells. For an optimal rejuvenation effect, planned parenthood recommends semi-annual pregnancies terminated after about four months.
1 TruthPains 2018-12-08
You have to be a troll, no one is THIS fucking stupid. No way.
1 trilateral1 2018-12-08
you really think someone would do that? write senselessly provocative comments on /r/drama?
1 fingerpaintswithpoop 2018-12-08
this tbh.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-12-08
Yeah because those private organizations aren't forums ostensibly dedicated to the principles of libertarianism.
1 TypicalLibertarian 2018-12-08
None of the principles of libertarianism state that you have unlimited free speech everywhere you go. E.g.: You can't put a sign in my yard and start screeching about free speech when I remove it.
Last I checked, the left; and Reddit, agreed that moderators effectively "own" their subreddits. So it's their community with their rules. Don't like it, go make your own community. With it's rules.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-12-08
So your response to "leftists" turning their subs into authoritarian shitholes (citation needed because plently of right wing subs do the same shit) is to do the exact same thing back? Way to destroy your principles to own the libs
1 TypicalLibertarian 2018-12-08
That's... not even close to what I said.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-12-08
Yeah you were citing property rights as a justification for /libertarian to go full authoritarian shithole. I igored that part because it is a complete non sequitur. A subreddit is not anybody's "property" as nobody owns it. Mods are janitors that keep out spammers and illegal content, they don't own the sub.
I just think it's hilarious that you guys are rolling over to a mod team filled with self admitted fascists to own the 5 libs that visit your sub. It's really the fate of all right libertarians to spread their cheeks for their fascist brethren.
1 TypicalLibertarian 2018-12-08
They didn't though. The rules are pretty much the same as every other subreddit. Don't be an asshole, don't troll, stay on tropic. If that's too difficult to follow than it's good that they'll ban you lol.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-12-08
If it's not an authoritarian shithole then why have they brought on openly fascist mods and gotten rid of the public mod logs? It's now forbidden to criticize the mod team and their definitions of (concern)trolling are so vague that they can be stretched to ban anyone who engages in wrongthink.
1 TypicalLibertarian 2018-12-08
Oh please, everyone is a fascist to you people.
No it isn't. It's against the rules to just spat at insults against them. If all you do is screech and call them fascists with no substance, then yeah, you've broken the golden rule, get banned.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-12-08
Lol I barely ever call people fascist because I still think that word has meaning. Take a look at where your new mods post the most and then tell me that they don't have strong authoritarian leanings. Enjoy your sub turning into an echo chamber. I hope it was worth it to keep the Chapotards out.
1 TypicalLibertarian 2018-12-08
Where they post is irrelevant. That's poisoning the well fallacy.
But what the fuck, let's take a look at their post history:
avengingturnip posts the most in EndlessWar, a subreddit all about the endless war that the US (and it's allies) seem to get into. As we all know, Fascists are peace loving people who hate war. 🙄 Next big subreddits for this guy are a bunch of Catholic subreddits (all Christians are Nazi's of course, THATS A FACT) /r/Libertarian (the fascist subreddit in question) and /r/DescentIntoTyranny (because fascists hate Tyranny).
Hayeku posts the most in /r/Libertarian (the fascist subreddit in question), /r/Economics (because only a fascist would use money...), and /r/politics. Ok that last one actually makes sense, he's DEFINITELY a fascist.
Z3F posts a bunch in /r/T_D (again, we all know the well is poisoned there so fascist #1!), a hell of a lot of NSFW subreddits (So he's a horny fascist, I wont judge), He ALSO posts a lot in /r/GifRecipes! (COMRADE STALIN ONLY EDITED STILL IMAGES! MOVING IMAGES ARE A FASCIST PLOT!)
JobDestroyer posts a lot in /r/GoldandBlack (a ancap subreddit, ONLY FASCISTS WANT NO GOVERNMENT!), /r/FuckTheAlt which dislikes both the "alt-left" and "alt-right" (ONLY A TRUE FASCIST HAS THIS TYPE OF SELF HATE!), /r/QualitySocialism (only fascists dislike socialism, you are either with socialism or you're a fascist!).
nixfu is active in fascist subreddits like /r/Libertarian (the fascist subreddit in question), /r/conspiracy (anyone who questions the government is a fascist), /r/Conservative and /r/T_D (Again, anyone I disagree with is a fascist, even the moderates in T_D).
FormerlyFlintlox posts the most in /r/Libertarian (the fascist subreddit in question), /r/Libertarianmeme (only fascists meme), and /r/Anarcho_Capitalism (a ancap subreddit, ONLY FASCISTS WANT NO GOVERNMENT!)
austrian_economics posts the most in /r/Anarcho_Capitalism (a ancap subreddit, ONLY FASCISTS WANT NO GOVERNMENT!), /r/privacy (Only fascists want privacy, the state should see all), /r/whowillbuildtheroads (only fascists meme).
So yeah, sorry but I DO NOT SEE WHAT YOU SEE. The places they post the most seem to match what I'd expect from /r/libertarian moderators.
1 LongPostBot 2018-12-08
Good job bobby, here's a star
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 TypicalLibertarian 2018-12-08
Oh thank you Mr. Bot.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-12-08
I didn't know that people who are actively involved in a personality cult surrounding the president of the United States are the ideal libertarians. You have 2 of those, along with an obvious sock puppet account (hayeku). More to the point though is that adding 7 mods of dubious provenance in one fell swoop smacks of a blatant takeover by right Libertarians. Do you have a single left libertarian on that mod team? Nope! Time to ban all the wrongthink left libertarians to make the sub into another circlejerk echo chamber where none of your ideas are challenged.
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-12-08
No, it is not.
Poisoning the well is a premptive ad-hominem attack on a person.
Saying that someone is wrong because they are a regular T_D or LSC user is fallacious.
Saying that someone has authoritarian tendencies because they are a regular T_D or LSC user is not fallacious.
1 westofthetracks 2018-12-08
lmao that you think ancaps arent fascists
1 TypicalLibertarian 2018-12-08
Oh hell no. Of course I know they're fascist. Along with everyone else.
Except those chosen by our glorious comrade Stalin!
1 westofthetracks 2018-12-08
stalin was almost a fashy as your average ancap. not quite, but almost
1 KittehDragoon 2018-12-08
Then why hide the mod logs?
You conveniently ignored that part.
1 TypicalLibertarian 2018-12-08
There are lots of reasons to keep it private. They don't want to deal with the constant wet blankets whining about every little thing, they don't want people trying to bypass their bans, etc...
As for the real reason to keep it private, you'd have to ask them. I honestly don't care if it's private or public. It has no bearing on anything really.
1 spliffthespaceman 2018-12-08
https://www.removeddit.com/r/Libertarian/comments/a4cfkd/new_rules_for_rlibertarian/ebdgmgh/
1 EcoSoco 2018-12-08
You're an idiot...have you ever looked up the history of Libertarianism or do you just gargle on whatever the Koch brothers send you?
1 regeya 2018-12-08
That's a tough one because although it sounds clear-cut, it's purely subjective.
1 Quietus42 2018-12-08
Yeah, I've argued with subscribers there that didn't want me commenting because I'm a liberal, that based on the sidebar I have as much right to comment there as anyone else. If the mods decide to ban me, well it's their sub.
It's disappointing to me but I can sorta see their issue. CTH has made a coordinated effort to continually disrupt the sub with bad faith trolling.
1 Quietus42 2018-12-08
Yeah, I've argued with subscribers there that didn't want me commenting because I'm a liberal, that based on the sidebar I have as much right to comment there as anyone else. If the mods decide to ban me, well it's their sub.
It's disappointing to me but I can sorta see their issue. CTH has made a coordinated effort to continually disrupt the sub with bad faith trolling.
1 error404brain 2018-12-08
Moderators own nothing not even the basement they moderate from.
1 modern_rabbit 2018-12-08
You're not being punished for your speech, you're being punished for trespass. Completely unrelated.
1 TypicalLibertarian 2018-12-08
You're getting punished for sullying my yard with your speech. Just like how people normally sully /r/libertarian. Now it's finally getting cleaned up.
1 modern_rabbit 2018-12-08
Maybe you should have kept your speech trimmed according to community guidelines.
1 regeya 2018-12-08
Let's modify the argument a little: let's say that I say that the public is allowed to post signs in my yard under a set of rules, with one of the rules being that I'll take them down if they violate the rules.. I go out in my yard in the morning and there's signs that break my rules, so I take them down. You're the one who put it up and you come stand in my yard and screech about free speech.
1 modern_rabbit 2018-12-08
No.
You won't.
I wouldn't.
1 regeya 2018-12-08
I'm starting to understand why /r/libertarian is banning people.
1 modern_rabbit 2018-12-08
No, I think that one snuck by you.
1 regeya 2018-12-08
Maybe you're confusing "libertarian" and "libertine", I don't know. They're both retarded.
1 modern_rabbit 2018-12-08
No, the rumor you fuck signs. I just add libertarian memes to shit for funsies
1 Hemingwavy 2018-12-08
I mean you're getting a lot of flak for this but the idea that you could have a community without a strong centralised government ruling it and people would chose to act in a manner that respected each other is ridiculous.
1 spartan6222 2018-12-08
no, but our sub was and that's what we loved about it.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-12-08
For a group so worried about brigadiers you guys sure are happy to come correct the record over here. But unlike r/libertarian we welcome you guys to come make a stink over here. The only rule you must follow is to post bussy so get your camera out friend.
1 spartan6222 2018-12-08
I am not worried about brigades at all. I do not think anyone should be banned just because they belong to certain other subs. I believe this is the death of what made the sub great and I expect to be banned within the hour for stating just that (which is now against the rules). Fuck the mods.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-12-08
Rip little buddy
1 spartan6222 2018-12-08
yep, banned. Not even half an hour.
1 error404brain 2018-12-08
Welcome in your new home, r/drama. You are retarded, so you are welcome.
1 SJCards 2018-12-08
We have the best extra chromosomes, don't we folks?
1 BeanerShnitzel 2018-12-08
Thank you SJCards! Very cool!!
1 Quietus42 2018-12-08
It could be. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how the mods implement these new rules.
1 spartan6222 2018-12-08
I have been a long time user of the sub and don't really go to other political subs because they are all garbage. I have just been banned because I criticized these rules. Some of these mods are LITERAL fascists, there is no way these rules aren't used to censor people. (they already have been, the mods are banning people simply because they post to ChapoTrapHouse)
1 Quietus42 2018-12-08
Yeah, I just looked over some of the mods posting histories.
RIP r/libertarian.
1 TotesMessenger 2018-12-08
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 cruelandusual 2018-12-08
You're violating the rule against concern trolling. No real libertarian actually believes in liberty or free speech for those they disagree with, so stop speaking in bad faith as if they do.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2018-12-08
Alternatively... Libertarians are bridal authoritarians with a ever thin veneer of ideals of freedoms.
1 trilateral1 2018-12-08
No. Look up Karl Popper and the Paradox of Tolerance.
:3
1 Mikeavelli 2018-12-08
Popper argues pretty strongly against this sort of heavy-handed authoritarianism. Everyone always focuses on the part where he argues a limit exists beyond which we don't need to tolerate intolerance, but ignores the part where he advocates keeping it in check through rational argument.
1 trilateral1 2018-12-08
That's the joke.
1 spartan6222 2018-12-08
Here's the thing though, I have been a member of the community for a while and I am not one of the CTH trolls. I in fact do not like them one bit. But we prided ourselves on being an open sub that did not silence people for their political opinions, and the mods have ruined that in the span of a week.
1 TypicalLibertarian 2018-12-08
Then you've taken pride in the wrong thing. /r/libertarian should be about libertarianism (hence the name). NOT about other ideologies. People complained about the low quality posts with all the memes that made it to the front page. Now it's usually just posts about socialism or how everything is fascist.
I'm glad they're cleaning up that shit whole. It started to mirror /r/politics WAAAY too much.
1 spartan6222 2018-12-08
r/politics mods actively censor articles they don't like. It's ironic that you used that criticism because that is the road /r/Libertarian just started on.
1 Quietus42 2018-12-08
So did the mod team change? I've heard that it did but I don't know for sure.
1 [deleted] 2018-12-08
[removed]
1 maybeyesmaybenot 2018-12-08
yeah they recently added a bunch of alt-right mods.
1 Quietus42 2018-12-08
Yeah, I just checked some of their posting histories.
1 Kiru-kokujin25 2018-12-08
did it make you yikes?
1 Quietus42 2018-12-08
More like disappointed. I liked r/libertarian.
1 Kiru-kokujin25 2018-12-08
i dont believe you
1 Quietus42 2018-12-08
k
1 GreasyPeter 2018-12-08
I can never take a sub seriously when it starts to take aim at supposed "concern trolling". It's just a thinnly veiled way to shut down discussion with some they disagree with. I have honestly never heard anyone use it except some left-leaning subs. I hope these rules are a joke.
1 Quietus42 2018-12-08
Well concern trolling is a thing, but I agree that using it for the basis of a ban is open to rampant abuse.
1 Bluest_waters 2018-12-08
lol
of course
1 Anen-o-me 2018-12-08
Try r/capitalismVsocialism of you want oppositional discussion and no moderation, a sub with a topic like r/libertarian has to be kept on topic.
1 spartan6222 2018-12-08
Does it? It operated perfectly fine for 10 years with basically no moderation. Ya there were trolls, but all they have are words, and that's the compromise you make for a free and open discussion.
1 trilateral1 2018-12-08
for about 9 years (until a year ago)
1 spartan6222 2018-12-08
It still was fine then. Open discussion was my favorite part and many others as well.
1 timsboss 2018-12-08
Disagree. /r/Libertarian should be about promoting libertarianism. r/Libertarian hasn't done that.
1 spartan6222 2018-12-08
r/libertarian should be a discussion about topics concerning things like government overreach, not a echo chamber. There are other sub reddits listed on the side-bar that are exclusively libertarians discussing those things. /r/Libertarian actually got to r/all many time with actual libertarian issuse, even if a decent amount of the comments weren't by libertarians, who cares? Now you get all libertarians and can circle jerk all together.
1 timsboss 2018-12-08
I care. The reaction to this change in moderation policy has made it clear that r/Libertarian has spread rampant misinformation on what libertarianism is. Libertarianism is not a knee-jerk opposition to authority figures. Libertarianism is a right wring political philosophy based on private property rights. The vision of libertarianism spread by the old /r/Libertarian isn't something I want to see popularized. An "echo chamber" is exactly what's needed to correct this misconception.
1 old_grumpy_grandpa 2018-12-08
Are you genuinely retarded? Libertarianism needing an echo chamber is as laughable as anarchism needing secret mod discussion and harsh rules about what is socially acceptable.
1 4digi 2018-12-08
Dude, honestly you're just a fucking idiot. Literally everything you said is wrong.
1 timsboss 2018-12-08
You don't know what libertarianism is. You can't learn political philosophy from memes.
1 4digi 2018-12-08
I've been a member of the party since 2002. How about yourself?
1 timsboss 2018-12-08
You know that doesn't speak to your knowledge of libertarianism, right? The LP is great, but it does not offer a consistent vision of libertarianism. Libertarianism as defined by the likes of Gary Johnson and Bill Weld is exactly what I take issue with.
1 4digi 2018-12-08
Thank you for the essay that has nothing to do with the question I asked you.
1 old_grumpy_grandpa 2018-12-08
Implying you aren't both cowardly, censoring cunt
1 barbadosslim 2018-12-08
well tbf it is nazis censoring the left
1 TypicalLibertarian 2018-12-08
Or you know, just normal ppl sick of their shit.
1 barbadosslim 2018-12-08
nazis and their ilk usually are pretty normal
1 TypicalLibertarian 2018-12-08
Oh, so it's more of this nonsense then
1 barbadosslim 2018-12-08
are you actually retarded or something?
1 Unkill_is_dill 2018-12-08
Username checks out
1 atleastafool 2018-12-08
Except you know how left libertarianism is a thing, right?
1 TypicalLibertarian 2018-12-08
Except you know, how left libertarianism isn't a thing but just communist propaganda, right?
1 TheHeroReditDeserves 2018-12-08
libertarianism and sexually engaging young children.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-12-08
This but as it is
1 trilateral1 2018-12-08
/r/libertarian now joins the ranks of fascist subreddits like /r/politics, /r/askwomen, /r/latestagecapitalism, /r/me_irl,...
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-12-08
When you become what you hate to own the libs 😂😂😂
1 trilateral1 2018-12-08
yeah. admins forced their hands by introducing the voting system.
that system only works if a large majority of participation in a sub comes from people who want the sub continue existing.
1 Murgie 2018-12-08
The voting system predates the subreddit entirely.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-12-08
imagine being such a plebbitor
1 trilateral1 2018-12-08
plebbitors are defenseless in the face of admin super powers.
1 error404brain 2018-12-08
Which is why this is a thing now that the admins have put away the voting system, that was put in place after the mods telling yes to it by the way.
1 trilateral1 2018-12-08
allegedly
1 error404brain 2018-12-08
Yes, I am sure it was only allegedly and not a pure naked alt right power grab. Sure.
1 atleastafool 2018-12-08
Didn't they remove it?
1 Unkill_is_dill 2018-12-08
Libertarianism and pedophilia
1 nanonan 2018-12-08
Abusive moderators and claims of concern trolling.
1 Inceltiers 2018-12-08
Begone vile tranny
1 BlacJeesus 2018-12-08
Pinochet and Helicopters.
1 diggity_md 2018-12-08
ohana means family
1 shaneoffline 2018-12-08
So it turns out 'coerced' is the least phonetic word in the english language
1 Tytos_Lannister 2018-12-08
oh great a, concern trolling rule! the broadest rule that got most people banned from /r/t_d and will allow mods to ban people who aren't 'true libertarians', which means people who don't worship Trump unconditionally
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-12-08
/r/conspiracy loves that rule too!
1 SJCards 2018-12-08
'tis the nobelest of rules.
1 ThePathToOne 2018-12-08
I still see a lot of posts on the front page with 300+ replies so its hardly committed suicide unless you are one of those people who will go "well, give it time, the sub will surely die soon" only for there to still be 300+ reply threads 3 months later and then you will surely say "well, give it time, the sub will surely die soon"
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-12-08
ltrly 5 hours ago dummy
1 Phantom_Engineer 2018-12-08
It's dead in spirit, like how r/drama died when pinging was banned.
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2018-12-08
😏Feeling smug😏
1 Tytos_Lannister 2018-12-08
i feel disgusted instead
1 JurijFedorov 2018-12-08
I said that! Actually it's true in this case. Not a single mod is more libertarian than me and I'm not even libertarian.
1 spliffthespaceman 2018-12-08
We even have a few pedophiles.
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2018-12-08
Gamers are like interns, they're just here to scrub toilets, get coffee, and get us a tax break.
1 jsideris 2018-12-08
Context for what's happened over the past 2 weeks.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-12-08
I guess the free market decided Chapotards were smarter than Libertarians. It could have gone either way so congrats on getting BTFO by retards.
1 jsideris 2018-12-08
That's retarded. If I murder you and steal your stuff, that doesn't mean the free market decided I'm smarter because you didn't murder me first.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2018-12-08
That is literally what it means you fucking retard
1 jsideris 2018-12-08
Nah don't be stupid. The sub won in the end though. New rules will keep all those filthy commies out.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2018-12-08
It'll keep out anyone who doesnt worship the federal government and an authoritarian white ethnostate. How libertarian.
1 Trollygag 2018-12-08
Well, except it doesn't. "Free market" doesn't preclude property or natural rights. Free market is not anarchy.
1 YourLocalMonarchist 2018-12-08
the people with candidates who think a car license is equivilant to needing a license for your toasters are now complaining that their mods are retarded.
1 ironicshitpostr 2018-12-08
tbh when aren't mods retarded tho
they do it for free
1 goderator200 2018-12-08
god, i wish it could get rid of mods.
1 illz569 2018-12-08
You have to be a mod to do that
1 Futhermucker 2018-12-08
the only rules that subreddit needed was a strict ban on boomer memes
1 error404brain 2018-12-08
Once again radical centrism show it's radical superiority by having radical free speech, something that was too radical for libertarian.
Going to congratulate commies for succeeding at destroying r/libertarian tho.
1 modern_rabbit 2018-12-08
When I've plowed enough bussy to become a mod, I will subpoena you for this.
1 error404brain 2018-12-08
>plowing and not getting plowed to become a mod.
Buddy you have visibly not understood how our mod system work.
1 modern_rabbit 2018-12-08
Alas...
1 Arbys_Official 2018-12-08
Then why can't I tell you to kill yourself
1 error404brain 2018-12-08
It's radical not extremist. :dab:
1 MilerMilty 2018-12-08
r/libertarian goes full pinoboo
1 seenten 2018-12-08
When the top comment is TotesMessenger spam
1 Gtyyler 2018-12-08
I went on record saying that r/Libertarian is the only living political subreddit that doesn't have its head out its own ass. It just took one little Chapo shitposter to ruin it.
1 modern_rabbit 2018-12-08
Yeah, and a whole bunch of "chapo-leaning but totally libertarians".
1 StickmanPirate 2018-12-08
Left-libertarianism has been a thing longer than the pedo type of libertarianism
1 modern_rabbit 2018-12-08
That's impossible because I'm the only true libertarian.
1 Fibberkick 2018-12-08
A politic sub going down the drain
News flash! The Reddit user is unable to get a girl friend
1 JurijFedorov 2018-12-08
They also ban you for trolling in other subs. Don't forget that next time you consider making a joke in here.
1 SwiftOnSobriety 2018-12-08
If the admins point a gun at your head and tell you to walk across a tight rope, is it really "suicide" when you fall?
1 westofthetracks 2018-12-08
this is your brain on amerilard politics
1 Kellere31 2018-12-08
Utopia®™ only works until someone **disagrs**, then it's time to get out the Mc©®™Nukes®©™
(((This comment was removed due to a claim from McMegaCooperation)))
1 mohkohnsepicgun 2018-12-08
The irony that libertarianism can't be made to run a subreddit and yet we're expected to believe it can be made to run a state.
1 noxpallida 2018-12-08
We need radical centricism to protect us from online libertarian vanguardism
1 TheDovahofSkyrim 2018-12-08
Did you actually read that article? It was nearly prophetic
1 BrianPillmansGun 2018-12-08
Understand that libertarianism isn't just anarchy. People can set rules if they want to in a subreddit. If we don't want you brigading and upvoting non-libertarian left wing nonsense, so be it.
Then you have see stupid threads like this one of people complaining about how they've been banned and they "barely" have any posts in r/chapotraphouse. Then you check their profile and there's quite a few posts to r/chapotraphouse in the past few months. Dig a bit deeper and you find out that he's actually a mod for r/libertarianuncensored and the sub has a bunch of posts upvoted about AOC and socialist economic policies.
Sorry, you wore out your welcome. If I can't try having a discussion about libertarianism without someone talking about muh roads, open borders, and how socialism actually isn't that bad, then its not actually a sub for libertarian discussion. Its more of what r/politics should actually be.
1 tron_funkin_blow 2018-12-08
If there's no counterpoint or debate, then its just a bunch of dudes jerking each other off and bitching about taxes. What a fucking stupid sub.
1 abzuma 2018-12-08
Well, Libertarians are dumb as shit, what do you expect?
1 BrianPillmansGun 2018-12-08
It’s funny how people want to come to the libertarian sub for discussion, but if you go to subs pertaining to their favored political ideology, you get banned for dissent. If I want to discuss libertarianism with other libertarians, that’s our business and not yours. Take your “open subs for thee, but not for me” nonsense and go screw.
1 otherwiseyep 2018-12-08
Libertarian: everything is literal slavery except actual slavery, which wasn't really so bad for the blacks, tbqh...
1 WeebonizedAutism 2018-12-08
Removed, what was the rule?
1 me_gusta_poon 2018-12-08
And your point is what exactly?
1 GreasyPeter 2018-12-08
Serious posts be here captain.