I’m riddled with shame. White shame. This isn’t helpful to me or to anyone, especially people of color. I feel like there is no “me” outside of my white/upper middle class/cisgender identity. I feel like my literal existence hurts people, like I’m always taking up space that should belong to someone else.

Outlines:

1. This Post - Outline

^{I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues}

You only take space on a hard drive, bussy. Try cheer up lad.

There is absolutely nowhere on Reddit (except maybe The Great Awakening) where stupider, sadder, scareder, or crazier comments consistently get upboats and support than this place you linked. You might think, Hey look! A place where women aren't all sucking tranny peen! Weird! But then you find out that they are scared of tranny peen, and believe that in a couple years, women who don't assimilate and get a peen themselves will be locked up in suspended cages, let down from their gibbets only to be repeatedly viciously raped and denied STEM jobs.

That place is like /r/drama if everyone here felt scared for their lives, and could only find possibly recourse in demanding mayocide and bussy. Swap our memes for 'white-female ethnosexstate now' and 'kill all men before they kill all women' and you have a pretty fair idea of their topics.

And that's where it gets interesting: they're unironically probussycide, unironically antifemayocide. Truly, /r/drama has its antithesis.

And believe me: it is dangerous.

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

If this has any validity the person who wrote this journal could get in a lot of trouble. Jokes exist in the scientific community, but generally they aren't loud like that, and while I can understand someone being frustrated with trump especially in the scientific community, it's unlikely that Fox and their shithole "news" affiliates are going to let this go. However, if you're using this to suggest that other scientific data is forged under other political intent, you are not only wrong but you also do not understand peer review

problems in fringe social 'science' means a trump joke hidden in a graphic of an experimental hard science article is evidence all science is biased against trump in ways(?) that matter

Boy your sensibilities would be absolutely shocked at what gets said in the hard sciences about this administration (and the bush admin, and Reagan, Nixon, Paul Ryan, Jim Inhofe, etc...) in the lab, at conferences, at meetings, over email, at the bar. And none of it matters at all, because none of it has any affect on data.

The problems aren't with the hard sciences you retard.

What is even the point of the link this post was submitted with, if it's not a problem, then?

owning urself to own biased lefty-science!

Keep goin I'm almost there

Christ almighty, you think biology and climatology are “soft sciences”? How retarded can you get?

You know that term refers to social sciences, right? Shit where human behavior characterizes the bulk of the data.

Climate Science AKA Meteorology is a hard science. Soft sciences are social sciences. All natural sciences (including meteorology which is the science and history of weather) are hard sciences. You are sperging out pretty wildly over sciences man. Did Daddy not buy you that rocket set you wanted when you were a kid?

Seems like you ignored my point and don't understand peer review. But ok e🅱️ic maymay

Hahahah coolio guess you've owned another one. E🅱️ic bro e🅱️ic. Hahahah, you said the thing I said because you are an e🅱️ic trololololo hahahaha

E🅱️ic reflection 🅱️ro. Hahaha, you're not trying to bait me into a drawn out argument where I have to explain things taught in 3rd grade science so that you can then ignore everything I say or anything, you just want a civil debate where you're not going to be an absolute retard hahaha e🅱️ic 😎😎😎😂😎😎😂😎😂👅👅💦👅😤😣😏😣💦😤👅👻🇺🇲

Get milked 🐄 nerd 🧓

Oh for fuck's sake, go get a graduate degree and produce your own studies if you're so damn concerned about scientific validity.

presenting data out of context and with no discussion of limitations is not good science.

I do understand peer review.

Okay.

it's unlikely that Fox and their shithole "news" affiliates are going to let this go

this is way too boring to become a Fox talking point

Nothing is too mundane for fox

”Jokes exist in the scientific community”

Lol as if the entire “scientific” community isn’t a joke.

As if your opinion isn't a joke.

What's the scientific community ever done for me?!

i’m pretty sure thomas edison invented gamers

That was stupid of him.

Thomas Edison I would consider an actual scientist. Not part of the “science community” prattling on about 500 genders and IQ doesn’t real.

is this a specific subreddit you’re referring to

Someone got paid for this.

Oh my God--you tellin' me a scientist somewhere has an opinion and, gasp, snuck it in like a based monkey anti-dadaist? Surely this is the end of science.

Libtards now know that science is a bit h with this e🅱️ic facts and logic post. Base be to the unscientific community amen👏👏👏👏

This is what happens when you have the Trumpmeister on your mind 24/7.

Literal agendapost

AND ITS BEAUTIFUL

Daddy isn't just living rent free in their heads. He's kicked out everyone else.

Nobody would have ever seen this paper otherwise. Genius PR move.

brb changing all data points in my paper to be different trump face emojis

Nah.They're labcels not celebrities. The handful who care about this would have heard about it anyway.

This totally clears science. Thank you!

Bunch of stupid science bitches

What kind of retard thinks science isn’t politicized in the US? Opposition to science is like half the platform of the controlling party.

And the entire platform of the opposition party.

Their entire platform is science? Might be a little extreme

[Opposition to science is] the entire platform of the opposition party.

name one and i’ll rationalize it

Labeling GMOs. GMOs require substantially less resources to grow and will help combat climate change. The response is emotional and not rooted in science.

sex/gender issues Umm, no sweaty, sex junk is settled™ science.

The only thing with actual grounding is combatting climate change.

Also, people may not value the same metrics in studies about policy. So if Party 1 says a study on Policy X has Y result and thus we should adopt Policy X, Party 2 might ask “Why is Y result important/desirable?”

while i agree with the second point overall, there is an overwhelming trend of Party 2 skipping the study part

Cope over coprology.

It's over for Science-cels.

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 52%. (I'm a bot)

Study by professors at Penn State, University of Washington.

An image in a scientific journal features a drawing of President Donald Trump's face superimposed on monkey feces.

The study, titled "Methylation-based enrichment facilitates low-cost, noninvasive genomic scale sequencing of populations from feces" and published on Jan. 31 in Scientific Reports, details "An inexpensive capture method for enriching host DNA from noninvasive fecal samples." The study is authored by Kenneth Chiou and Christina Bergey, currently scholars at the University of Washington and Penn State, respectively.

Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Study^#1 University^#2 scientific^#3 President^#4 feces^#5

This is one of the worst post I have EVER seen. Delete it.

I am a bot. Contact for questions