They targeted gamers. Gamers.

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, removeddit.com, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

Not. Fucking. Enough.

It's over for rational-policy-cels

It’s over for logicels

IF YOU AREN'T LOADING UP ON DRAMACOIN, YOU FUCKED UP. THE UPCOMING MELTDOWN IS GOING TO BE BIGGER THAN 2016.

I'm not afraid to say I voted for Trump, and I'll do it again in 2020. Donald Trump is going to build the wall he promised us, he just hasn't awakened to his master builder powers yet. He's the special. It'll happen any day now - just you fucking wait, chapotards. #maga #Trump2020

Evidence based physics is just JEWISH PHYSICS REEEE

Add that to the list of Judenphysik topics.

• sloped armor

• nuclear bombs

And now

• evidence based physics

cool history fact: Hitler/Nazis didnt want to pursue an atomic bomb as a primary/high goal because it was "Judenphyics"

"Jüdische Physik"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Physik

Disposing of making observations and testing hypotheses to own the libs

72% Upvoted

We have reached maximum C O P E here, folks

I wish we had a technocratic Authority.

Sounds badass tbh

Well that would be great if there was integrity in the scientific and academic communities. Unfortunately they are just as corrupt as the rest of our diseased society.

How does he support this claim? With a link to the story about the group that hoaxed a batch of humanities journals and to a rant about how corrupt the NSF, Cornell University, and arXiv.org are because he got banned from posting to certain topics on arXiv. Oh, and that rant was posted on a site that has topics like Science of the Spirit and High Strangeness, which is a bunch of UFO sightings.

My favorite part of the rant?

In 2006, I submitted a short manuscript on the thermonuclear ignition of dark galaxies to Astrophysical Journal Letters. I signed the required copyright transfer form, and the manuscript went out for secret 'peer review', but it was rejected without any substantive scientific criticism. So I submitted two other brief, but important, manuscripts. The fact that I was never asked to sign the copyright transfer forms for those other two papers prior to review, as required, was clear indication that they were not going to be accorded the fair and impartial consideration that is supposed to be the usual policy of the American Astronomical Society, the journal's sponsor. Not surprisingly, those manuscripts were rejected without any scientifically valid justification. I complained to the officers of the American Astronomical Society, who never responded, even though the by-laws of the American Astronomical Society (AAS) clearly state: "As a professional society, the AAS must provide an environment that encourages the free expression and exchange of scientific ideas." *In rejecting those manuscripts, the American Astronomical Society hid from its members, from the scientific community, and from U.S. Government science-funding officials, fundamentally new insights about the Universe, including why galaxies have the characteristic appearances they are observed to have [5]. *

Posts like this is why I do Heroine.

I am a bot. Contact for questions

Heroine?

Oh boy I'd fucking love to read those manuscripts! Ive done peer reviews for journals before and they can be pretty dry but I bet these would be hilarious.

How the fuck do you get banned from arXiv.

Why would you trust experts when you can just go with your gut

This decade-old Stephen Colbert joke has finally become reality

it's a shame what he has become

tbf we have buzzworded the fuck outta that one

hes right though its the same way thoroughly unscientific people keep citing "science" as some sort of monolith

just like 'race realists' who say they follow the science and the scientific evidence leads them to their real life conclussions, but don't have a single clue wtf are they talking about, right?

the fuck are you talking about lol

i mean how like tranny enthusiasts always cite some vague "science" and if you disagree with them you must hate science or not believe in science or whatever

like science is a process of learning new things, not a set of right and wrong things lol

i mean how like tranny enthusiasts always cite some vague "science" and if you disagree with them you must hate science or not believe in science or whatever

lol i literally don't know anything or care about tranny science because it's so marginal and irrelevant issue in the first place, it's also a boring really subject if you take drama away from it

like science is a process of learning new things, not a set of right and wrong things lol

well there is a huge contingent of people who think that science should inform our values, including many race realists, if you take their world for it

i thought you were one of these people? how else did you earn that flair?

i mean science wise theres nothing wrong with challenging existing theories, thats literally what science is

theres nothing more unscientific than saying a fact is established forever and beyond question

I'll have you know Cap, that my dislike for certain elements of the tranny culture are my primary centrist trait.

Imagine being dug so deep into the echo chamber you're literally a conspiracy theorist now.

As a masochist I frequent that subreddit fairly regularly. I'm pretty sure most of the DDF there are moderate to highly skilled trolls.

Really describes the whole maga mentality tbh.

It makes a lot more sense when you think of it that way.

So you're wrong.

Big if true

You mean the MAGA Mindset?

I don't get it, do these retards think a wall will stop millions of people overstaying their visas?

yes

I mean actually admitting you're a Trump supporter and trying to actually provide reasons for it is just kind of embarrassing at this point.

About the only respectable answer is to be like fuck it he makes people mad.

Otherwise you're just down to stuff like he's starting a trade war with China and being advised by some guy Kushner found by looking at authors of books on Amazon.

[removed]

So we should defer to politicians to be the ultimate experts on all topics rather than people who specialize in and devote their careers to studying them?

That's the basic idea of representative democracy, yes. We elect people to make decisions on our behalf. What you seem to prefer is a technocracy.

this nigga wants a democratic technocracy roflmao

"Evidence? You want Evidence? GOD DAMN COMMUNIST ANTIFA FILTH! ONLY SOY BOYS WANT EVIDENCE!"