PEDO DRAMA!! "Your sexual value is reduced by your history. That doesn't mean you're worthless, just that you may have to consider dating a guy you might otherwise consider below you, one who is a little fat or a little less attractive than you'd like." šŸ˜¤šŸ˜¤šŸ˜¤

1  2018-12-28 by -12x-

128 comments

My god I just checked your post history. There is no shaming you. This is literally your life. Just imagine how much you could accomplish if you werenā€™t addicted to Reddit. Youā€™re making a difference, though!

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, removeddit.com, archive.is

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

OP also thinks kiddie porn should be legal šŸ˜³šŸ¤® - and posts it on a gaymer sub.

Also, posts lolli polls.

This is why we need pinging again.

šŸ‘†šŸ‘†šŸ‘†

i mean, unknowing CP posession should be legal because if u have a nasty DA and judge you can be a sex offender for life if someone sends u CP without your knowledge. But yea, ping time pls

Sneakily putting CP into the DA's pocket, the perfect prank.

Letā€™s bring back public lynching again šŸ‘šŸ»

Pinging?

šŸ˜­šŸ˜­šŸ˜­

We can ping him! He's in this thread

Thereā€™s only one thing worse than pedos. That is weeaboo pedos.

What about furry weeaboo pedos?

All furries are weebs and all weebs are pedos

This but Unironically

So weebs in general then?

Sorry retard, but it's the truth. Eugenics is a good idea, and you're a prime candidate for culling.

Y I K E S

lmao saying that there's a legitimate argument to be made about CP possession =/= saying it should be legal. Damn you people are stupid.

Also I'm not seeing what's wrong with posting a poll to satisfy my own curiosity.

There's nothing wrong with it at all! You should do this kind of thing more often. Also if you could start regularly posting those kind of polls on this subreddit that would be great too.

Just wait until we start #CPGate you normie agecuck SJWs

I'm not some autistic narcissist who needs anybody to care about or take notice of my username or personal identity here.

Yeah, he says that but....

A society

We live in it

Damn, that guy's a scumbag

Huh. And we can't ping.

Bullshit.

Excuse me for making a fetishy post on a fetish subreddit you baby.

I have a fetish of feeding people like you to pigs, but I would never suggest anyone do such a thing to you in real life.

Wow me too. That's sexy. Show me those big hogs you got and maybe we can get this party started.

This is why we need pedocide

You first :^)

Except I'm not a pedo, sweaty

you baby.

I bet you'd love that you suck fuck!!!

I bet you'd love that you suck fuck!!!

One exclamation point is enough grandma.

I watch anime

I watch anime.

All you had to do is say "I'm a pedo too." man. You're among friends here. There's no need to obscure your language.

Anyway... Looking forward toward you being murdered in prison mate. All the best.

I had no idea I was in prison.

[removed]

Thatā€™s really juicy drama! Thank you!

Momma is here for u bb šŸ¤—šŸ¤—šŸ¤—

Why do some people in that thread feel the need to go full niceguys with their "actually I don't need sex if my partner doesn't want it, sex is just a luxury not a necessity".

Giving up a healthy and essential part of relationship to own some unhinged autist online šŸ˜Ž

hi, Iā€™m on of those guys that said something to that effect. fuck you btw lol.

imo, itā€™s mainly to point out that the sexual history/desire for sex is not the deciding factor (for me personally) on whether or not I would date someone, which is what OP is asking about. whether someone is a virgin or a raging slut doesnā€™t matter to me [as long as they donā€™t have any STDā€™s]. it just doesnā€™t and tbh it shouldnā€™t. and the dude that this post is referring to is desperately desperately trying to make this outdated, sexist, archaic system of purity come back when we should just leave it in the goddamn dark ages.

The 2 points involved here have nothing to do with each other. What the fuck.

what 2 points?

Past sexual history and current desire for sex aren't really comparable points.

The partners' current desire for sex is huge in making a relationship work(for the vast majority of people) while the former is whatever. Sexual compatibility is definitely a deal maker/breaker when it comes to dating.

Oh, yeah I meant to address those as two separate but loosely connected points. The past sexual history is relevant bc itā€™s what the dumbass commenter in the linked thread keeps suggesting diminishes OPā€™s ā€œsexual worthā€.

The sexual desire aspect is more of a personal thing to point out to the dumbass commenter that most of the shit related to sex is completely superfluous to someone wanting to date OP, especially when you consider the fact that plenty of people are having fulfilling, lasting relationships right now that arenā€™t dependent on sexual desire or interaction. Iā€™m sure itā€™s a deal breaker for a lot (Iā€™d even say most) people, but it just isnā€™t for me. And the dumbass commenter kept insisting that everyone is lying to OP and that we are all, in fact, very much thinking with our genitalia 24/7.

This is all being explained in a strange, superfluous way.

Iā€™m trying really hard to explain it, but it feels like the more I explain it, the more I have to explain myself lmao. Just gonna tell you what I just told the other commenter: I can agree that these points are extra and probably overkills the guyā€™s point about ā€œsexual valueā€ in a way that isnā€™t all too clear, but hopefully you get it. And if you donā€™t, ah well who cares.

yes, because he's retarded. most people care about wanting to fuck their partner, and ngl i wouldnt be surprised if theexarion came out of this shit in a few years and got way back into sex lol

Again, my point is that there are people like me that donā€™t put such a heavy emphasis on sex. If thatā€™s not you, thatā€™s totally fine. I never claimed that my personal preferences were the norm or should be the norm.

yes because you're retarded.

Ofcourse someone's sexual history shouldn't make them less attractive to you, that's a complete bullshit and the dude shits on his own theory by mentioning porn, and by rambling about some political correctness when he's the one being politically correct (atleast historically, like purity you mentioned).

I just don't see how not having sex fits into this, OP wasn't even talking about sex just dating. The history should not stop you having sex and OP does not mention not wanting to have it, so those comments come from nowhere and serve no purpose as far as I'm concerned.

The notion is that the whole sex factor - history, desire, virginity, all of it - is superfluous to whether or not someone would wanna date OP. However, the commenter was hinged to this idea of ā€œsexual valueā€ where it really had no place. I can agree itā€™s extra and maybe overkills the guyā€™s point in a way that isnā€™t all too clear, but hopefully you get it. And if you donā€™t, ah well who cares.

But it is though. Iā€™m almost completely asexual due to my abused (non sexual kind but still affected my sexuality anyway) childhood and most ran off in a millisecond when they found out about all of that. They are not ā€œbad menā€ per se. They are nowhere near like that pedo creep you were replying to. They were all decent men who just think sex is an important part of a romantic relationship and I completely understand it. The baggage is real.

Iā€™m one of the lucky few who found someone who didnā€™t care and they love me anyway. However, there are many others like that poor OP who cannot find someone that would not only judge them but also help carry that baggage. It IS asking for a lot. That pedo creep is not wrong in saying that itā€™s easy to say that youā€™re willing to online but the reality is much harsher.

You are an exception. Not the rule.

Definitely not denying that the reality of dating her is much harsher, I donā€™t think Iā€™ve ever denied that. And if I have or if I came off that way, then thatā€™s my bad. I can respect peopleā€™s decision to give a quick ā€œnoā€ given OPā€™s past and the baggage that comes with it. My issue with OP was him trying to hinge her to her ā€œsexual valueā€ which ticked me off like crazy lol.

Looking at the bigger picture though, Iā€™m very full of myself and need to look outside of my own personal bubble in the same way the pedo commenter does. Youā€™re right in saying that Iā€™m the exception. But thankfully for OP, that means that there is definitely, at the very least, a chance for her.

I see where you are coming from too. I just wanted to make it clear that not everyone, who would say no immediately to OP, is a monster or misogynistic or whatever.

Yeah, the use of ā€œsexual valueā€ is very off putting and unfortunately, there are still a lot of people who think that way. Disgustingly, he was right in saying that in reality, OP is experiencing difficulties in meeting someone who is willing to look past that. Thereā€™s always a chance, of course but OPā€™s dating pool is really small.

Was it the sexual abuse that made you into a seriousposting faggot?

Iā€™m flattered but not interested.

Yeah, the use of ā€œsexual valueā€ is very off putting and unfortunately

Sexual value is a useful concept. If you're sexually frustrated and no one thinks you're sexually worthy, it doesn't matter if they think you're a good person or not.

The pedo creep is wrong though because he places the issue on sexual attractiveness of OP to other people which shouldn't really play a role.

Now sure, there might be other issues related to the abuse that could harm the relationship, but they come after you start dating, not before you even consider dating like OP suggests.

Realistically speaking, someone who has been sexually abused in the past might have their own way of dealing with sexual activities or they might be like everyone else. You donā€™t know for sure until you get to the point of physical intimacy but I think most would rather not cross that bridge at all while there are so many other ā€œnormalā€ options unless they found OP very special and are really attracted to her.

Yeah that I agree with. Certain individuals like the linked kiddydiddler will flat out consider victims unattractive, sizeable part will not have an issue with attraction but will automatically assume relationship is going to be problematic, and then you have people who genuinely like the person and are willing to try to work out some issues - some will fail, some will succeed.

Lololol

sex is not the deciding factor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessary_and_sufficient_conditions

A choice is not totally characterized by a single necessity. But please, stay a while. Youā€™re a unique kind of retarded, and we like that.

Couldā€™ve gone the civil route but you wanted to be a condescending prick about it. Looks good on you!

And sorry, I guess I shouldā€™ve elaborated in unnecessary detail for anyone who happened to have only three brain cells to their name. Sex is not the penultimate deciding factor for some people. Better? No? Fuck you.

penultimate

adjective
last but one in a series of things; second last. "the penultimate chapter of the book"

šŸ¤” šŸ¤” šŸ¤”

Yeesh, is that really how I came across?? Iā€™m sorry if thatā€™s the case. Given the negative response so far, this is the most un-self-aware Iā€™ve been in a while lol.

three brain cells to their name.

You have brain cells to your name?

Why would you use penultimate there? You're basically saying "Sex is not the *second most important" deciding factor..." which is kinda weird for what you're trying to say. Just "ultimate" is what you want.

Fixed!

It's because he's retarded.

um yikes sweaty

I'll get the can

desperately desperately trying to make this outdated, sexist, archaic system of purity come back when we should just leave it in the goddamn dark ages.

You seem rather fervent with that policing of peoples' preferences and wants in their partner's there.

I just donā€™t think that calling someone unpure or less pure than others for something they were forced into is okay. I feel like people too often view sex as something that taints a person when it really isnā€™t, and that viewpoint is part of the reason why people like the commenter consider OP to have less ā€œsexual valueā€ by some objective measure.

whether someone is a virgin or a raging slut doesnā€™t matter to me [as long as they donā€™t have any STDā€™s].

Having AIDS is not something a person can just decide to change about themselves, it's more of an immutable trait like skin color or sexual orientation.

the fact that u want to JUSTIFY sex being part of a man and a woman bein together is just sad holy shit ... its so obvious jfc

What you never have to justify though, is your women having sex with other men šŸ˜Ž

drama mods especially

It's over for sexually active-cells.

Happy cock day.

I think those guys are being serious. They don't have sex at all, so even having someone willing to call them their boyfriend is a step up.

No difference between horrific, serial raping and blowing all the dudes at the frat house! What the fuuuuuck

Man. The actual post is sad as shit but the drama it spawned is like a rare flower. Very conflicted here.

that's one of the posts where I really hope it's fake because otherwise it's just too fucked up. Luckily it almost certainly is ...

If you're single, and sexually active in a moderately populated area more or less your body count is gonna be up there unless you're one of those people that feel the need to habitually be in a long term relationship. OP is either still a teen or doesn't date. In your twenties what's important is that you dont have kids and/or diseases. By your 30's the kids part is less important. If you date normally, sooner or later everyone has a bunch of notches on their belt, and being a virgin or unexperienced is a turn off and a red flag

i think posting here is a bigger red flag tbh

šŸš©šŸš©šŸš©

The girl was sexually abused, but just lets dudes use her for sex? Hmmm

That's a very common outcome of abuse.

Disturbing

Happened to me. I was sexually abused as a teenager and thus developed pretty unhealthy ideas around sex, feeling like the only value I had was in my body and if a guy came onto me, I genuinely struggled to say no because of the way my abuser had conditioned me. Thankfully I managed to realise how unhealthy it was by time I hit 20 and worked on it.

Sorry that happened to you :/

Thank you. I'm very lucky in that I have a strong support system of friends, and my fiancƩ is amazing about it too. The guy who abused me hasn't won yet.

Seems to me he already lost. Good on you. ā¤ļø

Thank you so much ā¤ļø

The guy who abused me hasn't won yet.

That's only true if his goal was to break you.

I feel like this is a tumblr fanfic that somehow found it's way onto reddit.

I hope so, it's sad all around.

Unironic seriousposting

The real reason not to get involved with someone like that is being tricked out as a kid will absolutely fuck them up for life. Imagine having to play therapist constantly

that was my first thought too. If it's real I wouldn't say it makes her less worth as a person or anything but she probably has mental issues from it which you wouldn't want in a partner. Obviously not her fault either but it's understandable.

They come with some baggage of issues. It's unfortunate but its hard to have a healthy relationship. That being said, no harm in trying if it works out

Yeah, I can fully admit that I just wouldn't fucking know how to handle something like that and wouldn't get involved.

[removed]

Jesus christ, I saw that thread earlier before he posted and just hoped it was fake because of how depressing it was. I failed to appreciate how it could get even worse.

Boys at school just use me, they donā€™t wanna date me because of my past, people call me a whore

Doesnt sound like they are wrong

You are a sad human being

This is drama stfu lol go back to all if you are going to be a little bitch

Itā€™s over for white knight-cels

No u

Look, we all have that brief "oh fucking YIKES" reaction to shit like this, but if you actually reply all triggered to an /r/drama post, the terrorists win, plain and simple.

Aww thanks

Smh people getting bootyblasted by a statement of fact.

>calling him a niceguy

This is RP 101 and the exact opposite of being a 'nice guy'.

Hookup culture is fucking aids btw and opposing it is the literal opposite of objectifying women.

she says theyā€™re just immature little boys and real men wouldnā€™t act like this.

r/gatekeeping

Yeah tbh my concern with her being told that is basically, oh, dont mess around with guys your age, older guys ("real men") are better.

Like, bitch, you know those are the sick fucks who were paying for her!

But read the replies holy shit lmaooo

You're fucking idiotic. I'm gonna be addressing your edit this time around.

I'm a heterosexual male. I literally do not give a fuck about a person's sexual history unless it involves the inclusion of STD's. You are seriously so narrow-minded to think otherwise and to suggest that no other guy in the world can possibly be attracted to someone with OP's history of sex - which, btw, was non-consentual, so the fact that you're holding it against her and allowing it to define her sexually is depraved and fucked up of you. You are a stain on the good name of society. People like you hold society back, you fuckhead.

Now to address your "hurr durr people are saying a fat neckbeard is just as sexually valuable as a hot guy" bullshit point. First of all, no one's saying that. Secondly, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so if someone thinks a fat neckbeard is hotter than an actor with a six-pack then that is their fucking preference and people are allowed to have different preferences than you. THEY'RE NOT LYING ABOUT THEIR PREFERENCE TO SUPPORT SOME WEIRD POLITICALLY CORRECT AGENDA. YES, THERE ARE REALLY PEOPLE ATTRACTED TO FAT NECKBEARDS AND THAT'S FINE. YOUR PERSONAL PREFERENCES ARE NOT THE NORM, CLEARLY, GIVEN THE SLURRY OF DOWNVOTES YOU'VE ASCERTAINED WITH YOUR DIPSHIT FUCKING COMMENT. Thirdly, even if everyone in the fucking world saw the hot actor as fuckable and the fat neckbeard as unfuckable, that does not equate for even a fucking microsecond to someone's attractiveness or capabilities or """value""" for future sexual/intimate experiences based on their PAST, NON-CONSENTUAL EXPERIENCES. YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON IN EVERY REGARD IMAGINABLE.

Mommy is soooo proud of you, sweaty. Let's put this sperg out up on the fridge with all your other failures.

I am a bot. Contact for questions

No wait! Youve got it all wrong! DD:

I like how everyone in that thread is acting like pedoboy is a complete anomaly and every other man on earth doesn't care about OP's past when OP herself clearly said that most men she meets have the same opinion

What do you expect from a bunch of Sims fucking each other and crying at night cause their happiness bar is low

C O P E

Lol seems like many people are burying the lead, and making it a body count issue, and everybody saying they would date her.

Not everybody would want to deal with the psychological scars that being forced into sex work results in.

Yeah, that sounds like the reality of it.

Lol all these serious posters in r/drama

Is sexual value really a myth? I mean all of my friends would roast the hell out of any dude bringing home a sex worker for anything more than a blurry night. The jokes would write themselves.

You are essentially paying for a sex worker 24/7 but with none of the benefits and more expensive. Lol imagine being in a relationship with a cum rag and bragging about.

Ok my srs post time

Idk stuff like this makes me appreciate my wife and our relationship. These morons actually believe the garbage flings they are having even compare to the emotional and physical intimacy of our lives. Most of the posts in relationships defending these shitty people/relationships dont even have a good way to gauge a "good relationship."

Idk maybe I've been spoiled by my wife and every other relationship I see seems like a hot joke that I wouldn't tolerate. Maybe I got too lucky and it warped my view.

Same here, I really think they are suppressing that little voice that whispers "I fucking suck for dating garbage" and it explodes into a furious fire of virtue signalling and justification

I'm going to be honest but you are right.

It's always

dont ask omg DO NOT ASK you dont want to know just let her past be past

But never

be honest and open immediately about your past its nbd

Guys are "comfortable" until they are reminded consciously avout it.

Sucks dating absolute garbage but to most on drama that's a mild upgrade

Where's the lie?

So Jason Momoa doesn't have more sexual value than this guy in your view? Or is the concept of sexual value only "medieval" when it's used against your gender?

I don't understand Reddit's obsession with this guy. Urgh, too much beefcake. Give me David Hogg any day of the week. Twinks > hunks